Snapshot img

Geographic Information System Analytics Market Size 2024-2028

The geographic information system analytics market size is forecast to increase by USD 12 billion at a CAGR of 12.41% between 2023 and 2028.

The GIS Analytics Market analysis is experiencing significant growth, driven by the increasing need for efficient land management and emerging methods in data collection and generation. The defense industry's reliance on geospatial technology for situational awareness and real-time location monitoring is a major factor fueling market expansion. Additionally, the oil and gas industry's adoption of GIS for resource exploration and management is a key trend. Building Information Modeling (BIM) and smart city initiatives are also contributing to market growth, as they require multiple layered maps for effective planning and implementation. The Internet of Things (IoT) and Software as a Service (SaaS) are transforming GIS analytics by enabling real-time data processing and analysis.
Augmented reality is another emerging trend, as it enhances the user experience and provides valuable insights through visual overlays. Overall, heavy investments are required for setting up GIS stations and accessing data sources, making this a promising market for technology innovators and investors alike.

What will be the Size of the GIS Analytics Market during the forecast period?

Request Free Sample

The geographic information system analytics market encompasses various industries, including government sectors, agriculture, and infrastructure development. Smart city projects, building information modeling, and infrastructure development are key areas driving market growth. Spatial data plays a crucial role in sectors such as transportation, mining, and oil and gas. Cloud technology is transforming GIS analytics by enabling real-time data access and analysis. Startups are disrupting traditional GIS markets with innovative location-based services and smart city planning solutions. Infrastructure development in sectors like construction and green buildings relies on modern GIS solutions for efficient planning and management. Smart utilities and telematics navigation are also leveraging GIS analytics for improved operational efficiency.
GIS technology is essential for zoning and land use management, enabling data-driven decision-making. Smart public works and urban planning projects utilize mapping and geospatial technology for effective implementation. Surveying is another sector that benefits from advanced GIS solutions. Overall, the GIS analytics market is evolving, with a focus on providing actionable insights to businesses and organizations.

How is this Geographic Information System Analytics Industry segmented?

The geographic information system analytics industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

End-user

  Retail and Real Estate
  Government
  Utilities
  Telecom
  Manufacturing and Automotive
  Agriculture
  Construction
  Mining
  Transportation
  Healthcare
  Defense and Intelligence
  Energy
  Education and Research
  BFSI


Components

  Software
  Services


Deployment Modes

  On-Premises
  Cloud-Based


Applications

  Urban and Regional Planning
  Disaster Management
  Environmental Monitoring Asset Management
  Surveying and Mapping
  Location-Based Services
  Geospatial Business Intelligence
  Natural Resource Management


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany
    UK


  APAC

    China
    India
    South Korea


  Middle East and Africa

    UAE


  South America

    Brazil


  Rest of World

By End-user Insights

The retail and real estate segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

The GIS analytics market analysis is witnessing significant growth due to the increasing demand for advanced technologies in various industries. In the retail sector, for instance, retailers are utilizing GIS analytics to gain a competitive edge by analyzing customer demographics and buying patterns through real-time location monitoring and multiple layered maps. The retail industry's success relies heavily on these insights for effective marketing strategies. Moreover, the defense industries are integrating GIS analytics into their operations for infrastructure development, permitting, and public safety. Building Information Modeling (BIM) and 4D GIS software are increasingly being adopted for construction project workflows, while urban planning and designing require geospatial data for smart city planning and site selection.

The oil and gas industry is leveraging satellite imaging and IoT devices for land acquisition and mining operations. In the public sector, gover

Literature review dataset

This table lists the surveyed papers concerning the application of spatial analysis, GIS (Geographic Information Systems) as well as general geographic approaches and geostatistics, to the assessment of CoViD-19 dynamics. The period of survey is from January 1^st, 2020 to December 15^th, 2020. The first column lists the reference. The second lists the date of publication (preferably, the date of online publication). The third column lists the Country or the Countries and/or the subnational entities investigated. The fourth column lists the epidemiological data utilized in each paper. The fifth column lists other types of data utilized for the analysis. The sixth column lists the more traditionally statistically-based methods, if utilized. The seventh column lists the geo-statistical, GIS or geographic methods, if utilized. The eight column sums up the findings of each paper. The papers are also classified within seven thematic categories. The full references are available at the end of the table in alphabetical order.

This table was the basis for the realization of a comprehensive geographic literature review. It aims to be a useful tool to ease the "due-diligence" activity of all the researchers interested in the spatial analysis of the pandemic.

The reference to cite the related paper is the following:

Pranzo, A.M.R., Dai Prà, E. & Besana, A. Epidemiological geography at work: An exploratory review about the overall findings of spatial analysis applied to the study of CoViD-19 propagation along the first pandemic year. GeoJournal (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10601-y

To read the manuscript please follow this link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10601-y

Have you ever wanted to create your own maps, or integrate and visualize spatial datasets to examine changes in trends between locations and over time? Follow along with these training tutorials on QGIS, an open source geographic information system (GIS) and learn key concepts, procedures and skills for performing common GIS tasks – such as creating maps, as well as joining, overlaying and visualizing spatial datasets. These tutorials are geared towards new GIS users. We’ll start with foundational concepts, and build towards more advanced topics throughout – demonstrating how with a few relatively easy steps you can get quite a lot out of GIS. You can then extend these skills to datasets of thematic relevance to you in addressing tasks faced in your day-to-day work.

Census geographic areas are used by the Census Bureau to collect, tabulate, and aggregate decennial census data, and are also used in more frequent demographics reports like the annual American Community Survey (ACS). Three levels of areal geography are available from MassGIS (with layer name in parentheses): Blocks, Block Groups, and TractsSee the datalayer metadata for full details.Map service also available.

Introduction

Geographical scale, in terms of spatial extent, provide a basis for other branches of science. This dataset contains newly proposed geographical and geological GIS boundaries for the Pan-Tibetan Highlands (new proposed name for the High Mountain Asia), based on geological and geomorphological features. This region comprises the Tibetan Plateau and three adjacent mountain regions: the Himalaya, Hengduan Mountains and Mountains of Central Asia, and boundaries are also given for each subregion individually. The dataset will benefit quantitative spatial analysis by providing a well-defined geographical scale for other branches of research, aiding cross-disciplinary comparisons and synthesis, as well as reproducibility of research results.

The dataset comprises three subsets, and we provide three data formats (.shp, .geojson and .kmz) for each of them. Shapefile format (.shp) was generated in ArcGIS Pro, and the other two were converted from shapefile, the conversion steps refer to 'Data processing' section below. The following is a description of the three subsets:

(1) The GIS boundaries we newly defined of the Pan-Tibetan Highlands and its four constituent sub-regions, i.e. the Tibetan Plateau, Himalaya, Hengduan Mountains and the Mountains of Central Asia. All files are placed in the "Pan-Tibetan Highlands (Liu et al._2022)" folder.

(2) We also provide GIS boundaries that were applied by other studies (cited in Fig. 3 of our work) in the folder "Tibetan Plateau and adjacent mountains (Others’ definitions)". If these data is used, please cite the relevent paper accrodingly. In addition, it is worthy to note that the GIS boundaries of Hengduan Mountains (Li et al. 1987a) and Mountains of Central Asia (Foggin et al. 2021) were newly generated in our study using Georeferencing toolbox in ArcGIS Pro.

(3) Geological assemblages and characters of the Pan-Tibetan Highlands, including Cratons and micro-continental blocks (Fig. S1), plus sutures, faults and thrusts (Fig. 4), are placed in the "Pan-Tibetan Highlands (geological files)" folder.

Note: High Mountain Asia: The name ‘High Mountain Asia’ is the only direct synonym of Pan-Tibetan Highlands, but this term is both grammatically awkward and somewhat misleading, and hence the term ‘Pan-Tibetan Highlands’ is here proposed to replace it. Third Pole: The first use of the term ‘Third Pole’ was in reference to the Himalaya by Kurz & Montandon (1933), but the usage was subsequently broadened to the Tibetan Plateau or the whole of the Pan-Tibetan Highlands. The mainstream scientific literature refer the ‘Third Pole’ to the region encompassing the Tibetan Plateau, Himalaya, Hengduan Mountains, Karakoram, Hindu Kush and Pamir. This definition was surpported by geological strcture (Main Pamir Thrust) in the western part, and generally overlaps with the ‘Tibetan Plateau’ sensu lato defined by some previous studies, but is more specific.

More discussion and reference about names please refer to the paper. The figures (Figs. 3, 4, S1) mentioned above were attached in the end of this document.

Data processing

We provide three data formats. Conversion of shapefile data to kmz format was done in ArcGIS Pro. We used the Layer to KML tool in Conversion Toolbox to convert the shapefile to kmz format. Conversion of shapefile data to geojson format was done in R. We read the data using the shapefile function of the raster package, and wrote it as a geojson file using the geojson_write function in the geojsonio package.

Version

Version 2022.1.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB31010000), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41971071), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, CAS (ZDBS-LY-7001). We are grateful to our coauthors insightful discussion and comments. We also want to thank professors Jed Kaplan, Yin An, Dai Erfu, Zhang Guoqing, Peter Cawood, Tobias Bolch and Marc Foggin for suggestions and providing GIS files.

Citation

Liu, J., Milne, R. I., Zhu, G. F., Spicer, R. A., Wambulwa, M. C., Wu, Z. Y., Li, D. Z. (2022). Name and scale matters: Clarifying the geography of Tibetan Plateau and adjacent mountain regions. Global and Planetary Change, In revision

Jie Liu & Guangfu Zhu. (2022). Geographical and geological GIS boundaries of the Tibetan Plateau and adjacent mountain regions (Version 2022.1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6432940

Contacts

Dr. Jie LIU: E-mail: liujie@mail.kib.ac.cn;

Mr. Guangfu ZHU: zhuguangfu@mail.kib.ac.cn

Institution: Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences

Address: 132# Lanhei Road, Heilongtan, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China

Copyright

This dataset is available under the Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0).

This layer shows residence one year ago for those 1 year and older. This is shown by tract, county, and state boundaries. This service is updated annually to contain the most currently released American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year data, and contains estimates and margins of error. There are also additional calculated attributes related to this topic, which can be mapped or used within analysis. This layer is symbolized to show the percent of people one year and over who lived in a different state one year ago. To see the full list of attributes available in this service, go to the "Data" tab, and choose "Fields" at the top right. Current Vintage: 2019-2023ACS Table(s): B07204 (Not all lines of this ACS table are available in this feature layer.)Data downloaded from: Census Bureau's API for American Community Survey Date of API call: December 12, 2024National Figures: data.census.govThe United States Census Bureau's American Community Survey (ACS):About the SurveyGeography & ACSTechnical DocumentationNews & UpdatesThis ready-to-use layer can be used within ArcGIS Pro, ArcGIS Online, its configurable apps, dashboards, Story Maps, custom apps, and mobile apps. Data can also be exported for offline workflows. For more information about ACS layers, visit the FAQ. Please cite the Census and ACS when using this data.Data Note from the Census:Data are based on a sample and are subject to sampling variability. The degree of uncertainty for an estimate arising from sampling variability is represented through the use of a margin of error. The value shown here is the 90 percent margin of error. The margin of error can be interpreted as providing a 90 percent probability that the interval defined by the estimate minus the margin of error and the estimate plus the margin of error (the lower and upper confidence bounds) contains the true value. In addition to sampling variability, the ACS estimates are subject to nonsampling error (for a discussion of nonsampling variability, see Accuracy of the Data). The effect of nonsampling error is not represented in these tables.Data Processing Notes:This layer is updated automatically when the most current vintage of ACS data is released each year, usually in December. The layer always contains the latest available ACS 5-year estimates. It is updated annually within days of the Census Bureau's release schedule. Click here to learn more about ACS data releases.Boundaries come from the US Census TIGER geodatabases, specifically, the National Sub-State Geography Database (named tlgdb_(year)_a_us_substategeo.gdb). Boundaries are updated at the same time as the data updates (annually), and the boundary vintage appropriately matches the data vintage as specified by the Census. These are Census boundaries with water and/or coastlines erased for cartographic and mapping purposes. For census tracts, the water cutouts are derived from a subset of the 2020 Areal Hydrography boundaries offered by TIGER. Water bodies and rivers which are 50 million square meters or larger (mid to large sized water bodies) are erased from the tract level boundaries, as well as additional important features. For state and county boundaries, the water and coastlines are derived from the coastlines of the 2023 500k TIGER Cartographic Boundary Shapefiles. These are erased to more accurately portray the coastlines and Great Lakes. The original AWATER and ALAND fields are still available as attributes within the data table (units are square meters).The States layer contains 52 records - all US states, Washington D.C., and Puerto RicoCensus tracts with no population that occur in areas of water, such as oceans, are removed from this data service (Census Tracts beginning with 99).Percentages and derived counts, and associated margins of error, are calculated values (that can be identified by the "_calc_" stub in the field name), and abide by the specifications defined by the American Community Survey.Field alias names were created based on the Table Shells file available from the American Community Survey Summary File Documentation page.Negative values (e.g., -4444...) have been set to null, with the exception of -5555... which has been set to zero. These negative values exist in the raw API data to indicate the following situations:The margin of error column indicates that either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute a standard error and thus the margin of error. A statistical test is not appropriate.Either no sample observations or too few sample observations were available to compute an estimate, or a ratio of medians cannot be calculated because one or both of the median estimates falls in the lowest interval or upper interval of an open-ended distribution.The median falls in the lowest interval of an open-ended distribution, or in the upper interval of an open-ended distribution. A statistical test is not appropriate.The estimate is controlled. A statistical test for sampling variability is not appropriate.The data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

A six degree grid in latitude and longitude covering the entire world

This dataset contains shapefile boundaries for CA State, counties and places from the US Census Bureau's 2023 MAF/TIGER database. Current geography in the 2023 TIGER/Line Shapefiles generally reflects the boundaries of governmental units in effect as of January 1, 2023.

A fifteen degree grid in latitude and longitude covering the entire world

In taking an integrated ethnopedological approach, this study aims to investigate the meaning of the distribution of the toponyms used in traditional and recent cartography of Sardinia (southern Italy). It is particularly, but not only, focused on those related to soil resources. Sardinia is particularly interesting in this respect, as its unique history, geography, and linguistic position makes it one of the Italian and Mediterranean regions with the greatest number of toponyms. This research investigated the toponyms belonging to an important sub-region of Sardinia, called Ogliastra (central-eastern Sardinia). The research was conducted through the following integrated approach: i) toponymy research and collection from different sources; ii) database creation and translation of toponyms from the Sardinian language (SL); iii) categorization of toponyms; and iv) graphical, statistical, and cartographic data processing. Distribution and diversity of toponyms were assessed using the compiled database, coupled with a geographical information system (GIS). Of around 7700 toponyms collected, 79% had already been reported in SL, while just 21% were in Italian. Of the toponyms in SL, 77% are of known meaning and 54% of these toponyms were characterized by a meaning directly and/or indirectly connected to specific environmental features. On the whole, morphology would appear to be the primary environmental factor able to explain the complex, articulated presence, distribution, and typology of the investigated toponyms. A least squares regression analysis of pedodiversity vs. topodiversity shows a very closed distribution, with an impressive high correlation index (R2 = 0.824). The principal factor analysis (PFA) shows that such a connection may be morphologically based, thereby confirming that pedodiversity and topodiversity are strongly linked each other. Overall, the research shows that an integrated ethnopedological approach, combining indigenous and scientific knowledge may be of great interest in order to mitigate the impressive phenomena of the indigenous knowledge lost.

These files correspond to the geometries of regions as defined in the DARIUS Database. Use for GIS.

TIGER/Line Shapefiles contain current geographic extent and boundaries of both legal and statistical entities (which have no governmental standing) for the United States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Island areas. Feature shapefiles represent the point, line, and polygon features in the MTDB (e.g., roads and rivers). Relationship files contain additional attribute information users can join to the shapefiles. Both the feature shapefiles and relationship files reflect updates made in the database. To see how the geographic entities, relate to one another, please see our geographic hierarchy diagrams here:https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/guidance/hierarchy.html

This file contains the 65 cities and towns in Massachusetts for which MBTA bus or rapid transit service is provided. This data is based off of the 2010 census. The legislative intent for some boundaries could not be mapped. Boundaries where that is true are identified in the attribute information. Name Description Data Type Example town_name Full name for the MA town or city identification. String Boston town_id MassGIS Town-ID Code (alphabetical, 1-351) Numeric 34 sum_acres Area covered by the town or city in acres. Double 31304.22 sum_square Area covered by the town or city in square miles. Double 48.91 Use constraints: This data set, like all other cartographic products may contain inherent aberrations in geography or thematical errors. The boundaries included in this data set were developed using accepted GIS methodology. Cartographic products can never truly represent real-world conditions due to several factors. These factors can include, but are not limited to: human error upon digitizing, computational tolerance of the computer, or the distortion of map symbology. Because of these factors MassGIS cannot be held legally responsible for personal or property damages resulting from any type of use of the data set. These boundaries are suitable for map display and planning purposes. They cannot be used as a substitute for the work of a professional land surveyor.MassDOT/MBTA shall not be held liable for any errors in this data. This includes errors of omission, commission, errors concerning the content of the data, and relative and positional accuracy of the data. This data cannot be construed to be a legal document. Primary sources from which this data was compiled must be consulted for verification of information contained in this data.

The Zip folder from the website where the shape files were downloaded from below, contains a range of key GIS boundary files for ESRI and Map Info covering Greater London.

The folder includes:

• Output Area (OA) 2011,

• Lower Super Output Area (LSOA) 2004 and 2011,

• Middle Super Output Area (MSOA) 2004 and 2011,

• London Wards (two files: City of London merged into single area and split into separate wards). There are separate download file for 2014 & 2018 boundaries.

• London Boroughs

Note: The OA to MSOA boundaries have been generalizad to reduce file size/loading time.

On maps created using these boundaries the copyright must be stated. This is: "Contains National Statistics data © Crown copyright and database right [2015]" and "Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right [2015]"

Downloaded from: https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/statistical-gis-boundary-files-london

License: UK Open Government License

ArcGIS Map Packages and GIS Data for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019)

**When using the GIS data included in these map packages, please cite all of the following:

Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, 2019. PLoSONE 14(8):e0220457. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220457

Gillreath-Brown, Andrew, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton. ArcGIS Map Packages for: A Geospatial Method for Estimating Soil Moisture Variability in Prehistoric Agricultural Landscapes, Gillreath-Brown et al., 2019. Version 1. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2572018

OVERVIEW OF CONTENTS

This repository contains map packages for Gillreath-Brown, Nagaoka, and Wolverton (2019), as well as the raw digital elevation model (DEM) and soils data, of which the analyses was based on. The map packages contain all GIS data associated with the analyses described and presented in the publication. The map packages were created in ArcGIS 10.2.2; however, the packages will work in recent versions of ArcGIS. (Note: I was able to open the packages in ArcGIS 10.6.1, when tested on February 17, 2019). The primary files contained in this repository are:

Raw DEM and Soils data

Digital Elevation Model Data (Map services and data available from U.S. Geological Survey, National Geospatial Program, and can be downloaded from the National Elevation Dataset)

DEM_Individual_Tiles: Individual DEM tiles prior to being merged (1/3 arc second) from USGS National Elevation Dataset.

DEMs_Merged: DEMs were combined into one layer. Individual watersheds (i.e., Goodman, Coffey, and Crow Canyon) were clipped from this combined DEM.

Soils Data (Map services and data available from Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey, U.S. Department of Agriculture)

Animas-Dolores_Area_Soils: Small portion of the soil mapunits cover the northeastern corner of the Coffey Watershed (CW).

Cortez_Area_Soils: Soils for Montezuma County, encompasses all of Goodman (GW) and Crow Canyon (CCW) watersheds, and a large portion of the Coffey watershed (CW).

ArcGIS Map Packages

Goodman_Watershed_Full_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the full Goodman Watershed (GW).

Goodman_Watershed_Mesa-Only_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the mesa-only Goodman Watershed.

Crow_Canyon_Watershed_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the Crow Canyon Watershed (CCW).

Coffey_Watershed_SMPM_Analysis: Map Package contains the necessary files to rerun the SMPM analysis on the Coffey Watershed (CW).

For additional information on contents of the map packages, please see see "Map Packages Descriptions" or open a map package in ArcGIS and go to "properties" or "map document properties."

LICENSES

Code: MIT year: 2019 Copyright holders: Andrew Gillreath-Brown, Lisa Nagaoka, and Steve Wolverton

CONTACT

Andrew Gillreath-Brown, PhD Candidate, RPA Department of Anthropology, Washington State University andrew.brown1234@gmail.com – Email andrewgillreathbrown.wordpress.com – Web

The Land Cover dataset demarcates 14 land cover types by area; such as Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Forest, Agriculture, etc.

If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below.

Category: Geography

Organization: Allegheny County

Department: Geographic Information Systems Group; Department of Administrative Services

Temporal Coverage: 1994

Data Notes:

Coordinate System: Pennsylvania State Plane South Zone 3702; U.S. Survey Foot

Development Notes: The dataset was created by Chester Environmental through combined image processing and GIS analysis of Landsat TM imagery of October 2, 1992, existing aerial photography, hardcopy and digital mapping sources and Census Bureau demographic data. The original dataset was created in 1993, then updated by Chester in 1994.

Other: none

Related Document(s): Data Dictionary (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1VfUflfki42mpLSkr1R-up_OXGD3mHnv8tqeXf6XS9O0/edit?usp=sharing)

Frequency - Data Change: As needed

Frequency - Publishing: As needed

Data Steward Name: Eli Thomas

Data Steward Email: gishelp@alleghenycounty.us

Census geographic areas are used by the Census Bureau to collect, tabulate, and aggregate decennial census data, and are also used in more frequent demographics reports like the annual American Community Survey (ACS). Three levels of areal geography are available from MassGIS (with layer name in parentheses): Blocks, Block Groups, and Tracts.See the datalayer metadata for full details.Feature service also available.

Geotweet Archive v2.0 The Harvard Center for Geographic Analysis (CGA) maintains the Geotweet Archive, a global record of tweets spanning time, geography, and language. The primary purpose of the Archive is to make a comprehensive collection of geo-located tweets available to the academic research community. The Archive extends from 2010 to the present and is updated daily. The number of tweets in the collection totals approximately 10 billion, and it is stored on Harvard University’s High Performance Computing (HPC) cluster. The Harvard HPC supports many applications for working with big spatio-temporal datasets, including two geospatial tools recently deployed by the CGA: OmniSci Immerse, and PostGIS. The Geotweet Archive consists of tweets which carry two types of geospatial signature: 1) GPS-based longitude/latitude generated by the originating device 2) Place-name-centroid-based longitude/latitude from the bounding box provided by Twitter, based on the user-define place designation (typically a town name). Any tweet which carries one or both of these signatures is included in the Archive. Approximately 1-2% of all tweets contain such geographic coordinates, (this percentage needs verification and may vary over time). The current version of the Archive is Version 2.0. The original Version 1.0 archive began in 2012 as part of a project with Ben Lewis of CGA and then Harvard graduate student Todd Mostak, to develop a GPU-powered spatial database called GEOPS. GEOPS formed the basis for technology startup MapD Technologies, which is now OmniSci. OmniSci Immerse software now runs on Harvard’s High Performance Computing (HPC) environment to support interactive exploration and analytics with the Geotweet Archive and any other large datasets. Version 2.0 of the archive represents the results of a merge between the CGA archive, and an archive developed by the Department of Geoinformatics at the University of Salzburg in Austria, as well as several other archives. Clemens Havas and Bernd Resch at University of Salzburg, and Devika Kakkar of Harvard CGA collaborated to deploy Version 2.0. ======================================================== Schema of Geotweet Archive v2.0 Field name_TYPE_Description message_id----BIGINT----Tweet ID tweet_date----TIMESTAMP----Date and time of tweet from Twitter (utc) tweet_text----TEXT ENCODING----Text content of tweet tags----TEXT ENCODING DICT----Tweet hashtags tweet_lang----TEXT ENCODING DICT----Language that the tweet is in source ----TEXT ENCODING DICT----Operating system or application type used to create the tweet place*----TEXT ENCODING NONE----The geographic place as defined by the user, usually a town name. A bounding box determined by Twitter based on this field, from which centroids (see longitude and latitude fields) and the spatial_error field are derived, and used when not overridden by a GPS coordinate. See Twitter tweet object for place. retweets ----SMALLINT----Number of retweets as of last time it was checked tweet_favorites----SMALLINT----Now known as ‘likes’ photo_url----TEXT ENCODING DICT----URL of any image referenced quoted_status_id ----BIGINT----ID number for quote status user_id ----BIGINT----User ID number user_name----TEXT ENCODING NONE----User name user_location*----TEXT ENCODING NONE----User defined location, usually a city or town. See Twitter user object. followers ----SMALLINT----Followers as of the last time checked friends ----SMALLINT----Number of users followed by this user user_favorites----INT----Number of topics the user is interested in status----INT----Code for what user is doing as of last time it was checked user_lang----TEXT ENCODING DICT----User defined language latitude----FLOAT----Latitude from GPS or bounding box based on Place field longitude----FLOAT----Longitude from GPS or bounding box based on Place field data_source*----TEXT ENCODING DICT----The source crawler or dataset for the tweet gps----TEXT ENCODING DICT----Flag for whether lon/lat is from GPS or town name bounding box (SRID – 4326). When both are present, the GPS coordinate takes priority. spatialerror----FLOAT----Estimate in meters horizontal error for lon/lat coordinate. 10m for GPS coordinates, error for bounding boxes calculated as radius of circle with area of bounding box. ===================================================== *data_source_Code U. Salzburg REST API crawler----1 Harvard CGA streaming crawler----2 U. Salzburg streaming API crawler----3 Ryan Qi Wang and Harvard Medical School datasets----4 U. Heidelberg dataset----5 Archive.org dataset----6 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Before April of 2015 the default for GPS coordinate capture was turned on for Twitter users. After this date users have had to opt-in to share their precise location. This is one reason for the large decrease in volume of geotweets after this date. A number of automated...

This 1m Digital Terrain Model (DTM) is derived from bare-ground Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) point cloud data from September 2005 for the Green Lakes Valley, near Boulder Colorado. This dataset is better suited for derived layers such as slope angle, aspect, and contours. The DTM was created from LiDAR point cloud tiles subsampled to 1-meter postings, acquired by the National Center for Airborne Laser Mapping (NCALM) project. This data was collected in collaboration between the University of Colorado, Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research (INSTAAR) and NCALM, which is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). The DTM has the functionality of a map layer for use in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) or remote sensing software. Total area imaged is 35 km^2. The LiDAR point cloud data was acquired with an Optech 1233 Airborne Laser Terrain Mapper (ALTM) and mounted in a twin engine Piper Chieftain (N931SA) with Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) at a flying height of 600 m. Data from two GPS (Global Positioning System) ground stations were used for aircraft trajectory determination. The continuous DTM surface was created by mosaicing and then kriging 1 km2 LiDAR point cloud LAS-formated tiles using Golden Software's Surfer 8 Kriging algorithm. Horizontal accuracy and vertical accuracy is unknown. The layer is available in GEOTIF format approx. 265 MB of data. It has a UTM zone 13 projection, with a NAD83 horizonal datum and a NAVD88 vertical datum computed using NGS GEOID03 model, with FGDC-compliant metadata. A shaded relief model was also generated. A similar layer, the Digital Surface Model (DSM), is a first-stop elevation layer. A processing report and readme file are included with this data release. The DTM is available through an unrestricted public license. The LiDAR DEMs will be of interest to land managers, scientists, and others for study of topography, ecosystems, and environmental change. NOTE: This EML metadata file does not contain important geospatial data processing information. Before using any NWT LTER geospatial data read the arcgis metadata XML file in either ISO or FGDC compliant format, using ArcGIS software (ArcCatalog > description), or by viewing the .xml file provided with the geospatial dataset.

This data is a mosaic of CTX DEM and ORI’s covering the ExoMars rover landing site in Oxia Planum. This data is a basemap for Oxia Planum and will act as a georeferencing base layer for future High resolution datasets of the rover landing site.ContentsThis data set contains 4 directories:03_a Sets of elevation contours at 100 m and 25 m spacing made from the DEM and smoothed for use in map publications.03_b Mosaic of orthorectified CTX images that accompany the DEM. These data are provided in an equirectangular projection centered at 335.45°E 03_c Hillshade model of the CTX DEM mosaic. These data are provided to help assess the variability and quality of the DEM. These data are provided in an equirectangular projection centered at 335.45°E03_d CTX DEM mosaic. These data are provided in an equirectangular projection centered at 335.45°EGuide to individual files03_a_CTX_DEM_contoursNaming convention: CTX_OXIA_DEM = data from which the contours where created, _cont = contour data, _m = vertical separation of the contours (25 or 100.)File name (example) Description CTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.cpg CTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.dbf CTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.prj Projection information CTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.sbx CTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.shp <- Shape file data Open this data in GiS with the other supporting files in the same directoryCTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.shp.xml Geoprocessing history CTX_OXIA_DEM_cont_100m.shx 03_b_CTX_ORINaming convention: CTX = Instrument, OXIA = Location, ORI = Orthorectified image, 6m = pixel sizeFile name Description CTX_OXIA_ORI_6m.tfw World file <- Open this data in GiS with the other supporting files in the same directoryCTX_OXIA_ORI_6m.tif Image data CTX_OXIA_ORI_6m.tif.aux.xml Auxiliary symbology statistics CTX_OXIA_ORI_6m.tif.ovr Image overviews CTX_OXIA_ORI_6m.tif.xml Geoprocessing history These data are provided with the following projection: Equirectangular_Mars_Oxia_Planum, Projections = Equidistant_Cylindrical, Datum = D_Mars_2000 Spheroid, Central meridian = 335.4503_c_CTX_DEM_hsNaming convention: CTX = Instrument, OXIA = Location, DEM = Digital Elevation Model, 20m = Pixel Size, _hs = hill shade model (sun potion 315°, azimuth 45°)File name Description CTX_OXIA_DEM_20m_hs.tfw World file <- Open this data in GiS with the other supporting files in the same directoryCTX_OXIA_DEM_20m_hs.tif Image data CTX_OXIA_DEM_20m_hs.tif.aux.xml Auxiliary symbology statistics CTX_OXIA_DEM_20m_hs.ovr Image overviews CTX_OXIA_ DEM_20m_hs.tif.xml Geoprocessing history 03_d_CTX_DEMNaming convention: CTX = Instrument, OXIA = Location, DEM = Digital Elevation Model, 20m = Pixel SizeFile name Description CTX_OXIA_DEM_20m.tfw World file <- Open this data in GiS with the other supporting files in the same directoryCTX_OXIA_DEM_20m.tif Image data CTX_OXIA_DEM_20m.tif.aux.xml Auxiliary symbology statistics CTX_OXIA_DEM_20m.ovr Image overviews These data are provided with the following projection: Equirectangular_Mars_Oxia_Planum, Projections = Equidistant_Cylindrical, Datum = D_Mars_2000 Spheroid, Central meridian = 335.45Digital elevation models Digital elevation models (DEMs) were produced from CTX stereo images using the USGS Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS) software and the BAE photogrammetric package SOCET SET according to the method of Kirk et al. (2008). We selected 6 CTX image pairs to maximise coverage of the canyon. Tie points were automatically populated in SOCET SET between each image pair. In a departure from previous methods, we ran bundle adjustments on adjacent stereo pairs, removing erroneous tie points until the remaining points had an RMS pixel matching error of ≤ 0.6 pixels. This approach resulted in improved coregistration between stereo pairs, and minimal topographic artefacts across stereo pair boundaries. Each resultant DEM was tied vertically to Mars Orbital Laser Altimeter (MOLA; Zuber et al., 1992) topography and exported with a horizontal post spacing of 20 m/pixel. We then exported orthorectified images from SOCET SET at a resolution of 6 m/pixel. The orthorectified images (ORI) and DEMs were then post-processed in ISIS, mosaicked in the software ENvironment for Visualising Images (ENVI), provided by Harris Geospatial, before manual georeferencing in ArcGIS. Finally, the georeferenced image mosaic was blended in Adobe Photoshop to remove seamlines using the Avenza Geographic Imager extension, which retains geospatial information in the blended product.The output from SocetSet® are 18 – 20 m/pix DEM resolving topography of ~50 – 60 m features and 12 orthorectified CTX images at 6 m/pix. The Expected Vertical Precision (EVP) in each CTX DEM can be estimated based on viewing geometry and pixel scale (Randolph L. Kirk et al., 2003, 2008) e.g. EVP = Δp IFOV / (parallax/height). Where: Δp is the RMS stereo matching error in pixel units, assumed to be 0.2 pixels (Cook et al., 1996) and confirmed with matching software for several other planetary image data sets (Howington-Kraus et al., 2002; R. L. Kirk et al., 1999). The pixel matching error is influenced by signal-to-noise ratio, scene contrast and differences in illumination between the images. Pattern noise can also be introduced by the automatic terrain extraction algorithm, especially in areas of low correlation. These can be identified as patches of ‘triangles’ in the hillshade model (e.g., smooth, low contrast slopes and along shadows). IFOV is the instantaneous field of view of the image (pixel size in metres). If the paired images have different IFOV the RMS values is used e.g. IFOV = √(pixel scale image 1 + pixel scale image 2). The parallax/height ratio, calculated from the three-dimensional intersection geometry, reduces to tan(e) for an image with emission angle ‘e’ paired with a nadir image, e.g., parallax/height = tan(e) where e = |emission angle 1 − emission angle 2|.GeoreferencingMars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC; Gwinner et al., 2016) MC11- mosaic (Kersten et al., 2018) has been used as the base control mosaic (tile HMC_11W24_co5ps.tif http://hrscteam.dlr.de/HMC30/).. This data is controlled to the Mars Orbital Laser Altimeter (MOLA; Smith et al., 2001) data the most accurate elevation data for Mars.Registration of the CTX DEM mosaic to the HRSC mosaic used manual tie points between the CTX ORI and HRSC mosaic and applying these tie points to the DEM mosaic. Manual tie points were used because automatic methods gave unsatisfactory results. The CTX mosaic data was rectified using the spline transformation. which optimizes for local accuracy but not global accuracy (Esri, 2020). This method provided good results for images with a range of viewing angles and accounts well for local adjustments needed for abrupt elevation changes.Topographic contoursTopographic contours were created at 25 m intervals from a CTX DEM down sampled to 100 m/pix, and contours shorter than 1500 m were removed and the lines smoothed using the PAEK algorithm at a tolerance of 200 m (USGS & MRCTR GIS Lab, 2018).