Facebook
TwitterThis data set represents Voter Precinct boundaries for Jackson County. These data are maintained by Jackson County GIS in coordination with Elections as annexations and redistricting occur. This dataset went through a major revision in 2017 where most of the precincts were renumbered. To view precinct boundaries from before 2017. Please see this dataset.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Building footprints are polygon features which represent structures in Jackson County. The layer is maintained by several different organizations in Jackson County including the City of Medford and the City of Ashland. These organizations building footprint data along with footprint information from several Jackson County departments is incorporated into this layer representing the best information about building footprints in the County.
Facebook
Twitter1910 map by Jackson County Abstract Co showing ownership in Jackson County.
Facebook
TwitterThis map shows the Housing and Urban Development Areas in Jackson County and was Map 12 in the Jackson County Community Fire Plan. The page size is 11 inches by 17 inches.
Facebook
TwitterCity limits and city annexations for incorporated cities within Jackson County. These data are created annually by using the assessor's tax code polygons. Any error in the city limits should be brought to the attention of the Jackson County Assessor's office for correction of the tax code polygons which are used for the creation of these data. In some cases, a city may have applied for and had an annexation approved which is not reflected in these data. Once the city pays the county to finalize the annexation, the changes should be reflected.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Rogue Community College Zones In Jackson County
Facebook
TwitterA public, non-editable, layer used in public facing web-maps and app.This data is a copy of the Genasys Evacuation Zones. Jackson County Oregon Evacuation Zones developed from Zonehaven Zones and Emergency Managers within the County. This data was approved by Emergency Management and went live in May 2024.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
On November 23, 2011 the Jackson County Board of Commissioners adopted the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional Plan ("Regional Plan") as an amendment to its comprehensive plan which establishes Urban Reserve Areas (URA) for Central Point, Eagle Point, Medford, Phoenix, and Talent. This amendment establishes URAs to accommodate planned residential, commercial and industrial growth to accommodate a doubling of the current population. In reaching this decision, Jackson County updated its population forecast in the acknowledged comprehensive plan, analyzed buildable land in the Bear Creek Valley, and revised comprehensive plan policies about future urban development.
Facebook
TwitterThis data is based on County Assessor's Tax-Codes and is updated regularly.This data is created by using the Assessor's tax-code polygons, which are update by approve annexation, ordinances, and resolutions on a regular basis. Any perceived error in the school districts should be brought to the attention of the Jackson County Assessor's office. All boundary changes are subject to Department of Revenue boundary change ORS #308.225 (ORS 308.225 – Boundary changes). In some cases, a property may have an annexation approved which is not yet reflected in these data. Historic and current Annexations may be seen in the Annexations feature service.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Bike lanes, paths, 3-foot shoulders, and other bike routes in Jackson County. County GIS does not actively search out changes or additions to bike routes, but rather relies on input from trusted partners.
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset is a compilation of county parcel data from Minnesota counties that have opted-in for their parcel data to be included in this dataset.
It includes the following 59 counties that have opted-in as of the publication date of this dataset: Aitkin County, Anoka County, Becker County, Benton County, Big Stone County, Carlton County, Carver County, Cass County, Chippewa County, Chisago County, Clay County, Clearwater County, Cook County, Crow Wing County, Dakota County, Douglas County, Fillmore County, Grant County, Hennepin County, Houston County, Isanti County, Itasca County, Jackson County, Koochiching County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake County, Lake of the Woods County, Lyon County, Marshall County, McLeod County, Mille Lacs County, Morrison County, Mower County, Murray County, Norman County, Olmsted County, Otter Tail County, Pennington County, Pipestone County, Polk County, Pope County, Ramsey County, Red Lake County, Renville County, Rice County, Scott County, Sherburne County, St. Louis County, Stearns County, Steele County, Stevens County, Traverse County, Wabasha County, Waseca County, Washington County, Wilkin County, Winona County, Wright County, and Yellow Medicine County.
If you represent a county not included in this dataset and would like to opt-in, please contact Heather Albrecht (Heather.Albrecht@hennepin.us), co-chair of the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council (GAC)’s Parcels and Land Records Committee's Open Data Subcommittee. County parcel data does not need to be in the GAC parcel data standard to be included. MnGeo will map the county fields to the GAC standard.
County parcel data records have been assembled into a single dataset with a common coordinate system (UTM Zone 15) and common attribute schema. The county parcel data attributes have been mapped to the GAC parcel data standard for Minnesota: https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/committee/standards/parcel_attrib/parcel_attrib.html
This compiled parcel dataset was created using Python code developed by Minnesota state agency GIS professionals, and represents a best effort to map individual county source file attributes into the common attribute schema of the GAC parcel data standard. The attributes from counties are mapped to the most appropriate destination column. In some cases, the county source files included attributes that were not mapped to the GAC standard. Additionally, some county attribute fields were parsed and mapped to multiple GAC standard fields, such as a single line address. Each quarter, MnGeo provides a text file to counties that shows how county fields are mapped to the GAC standard. Additionally, this text file shows the fields that are not mapped to the standard and those that are parsed. If a county shares changes to how their data should be mapped, MnGeo updates the compilation. If you represent a county and would like to update how MnGeo is mapping your county attribute fields to this compiled dataset, please contact us.
This dataset is a snapshot of parcel data, and the source date of the county data may vary. Users should consult County websites to see the most up-to-date and complete parcel data.
There have been recent changes in date/time fields, and their processing, introduced by our software vendor. In some cases, this has resulted in date fields being empty. We are aware of the issue and are working to correct it for future parcel data releases.
The State of Minnesota makes no representation or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the use or reuse of data provided herewith, regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. THE DATA IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH NO GUARANTEE OR REPRESENTATION ABOUT THE ACCURACY, CURRENCY, SUITABILITY, PERFORMANCE, MECHANTABILITY, RELIABILITY OR FITINESS OF THIS DATA FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This dataset is NOT suitable for accurate boundary determination. Contact a licensed land surveyor if you have questions about boundary determinations.
DOWNLOAD NOTES: This dataset is only provided in Esri File Geodatabase and OGC GeoPackage formats. A shapefile is not available because the size of the dataset exceeds the limit for that format. The distribution version of the fgdb is compressed to help reduce the data footprint. QGIS users should consider using the Geopackage format for better results.
Facebook
TwitterThis Zoning feature class is an element of the Oregon GIS Framework statewide, Zoning spatial data. This version is authorized for public use. Attributes include zoning districts that have been generalized to state classes. As of June 30, 2023, this feature class contains zoning data from 229 local jurisdictions. DLCD plans to continue adding to and updating this statewide zoning dataset as they receive zoning information from the local jurisdictions. Jurisdictions included in the latest version of the statewide zoning geodatabase: Cities: Adams, Adrian, Albany, Amity, Antelope, Ashland, Astoria, Athena, Aurora, Banks, Barlow, Bay City, Beaverton, Bend, Boardman, Bonanza, Brookings, Brownsville, Burns, Butte Falls, Canby, Cannon Beach, Carlton, Cascade Locks, Cave Junction, Central Point, Chiloquin, Coburg, Columbia City, Coos Bay, Cornelius, Corvallis, Cottage Grove, Creswell, Culver, Dayton, Detroit, Donald, Drain, Dufur, Dundee, Dunes City, Durham, Eagle Point, Echo, Enterprise, Estacada, Eugene, Fairview, Falls City, Florence, Forest Grove, Fossil, Garibaldi, Gaston, Gates, Gearhart, Gervais, Gladstone, Gold Beach, Gold Hill, Grants Pass, Grass Valley, Gresham, Halsey, Happy Valley, Harrisburg, Helix, Hermiston, Hillsboro, Hines, Hood River, Hubbard, Idanha, Independence, Jacksonville, Jefferson, Johnson City, Jordan Valley, Junction City, Keizer, King City, Klamath Falls, La Grande, La Pine, Lafayette, Lake Oswego, Lebanon, Lincoln City, Lowell, Lyons, Madras, Malin, Manzanita, Maupin, Maywood Park, McMinnville, Medford, Merrill, Metolius, Mill City, Millersburg, Milton-Freewater, Milwaukie, Mitchell, Molalla, Monmouth, Moro, Mosier, Mount Angel, Myrtle Creek, Myrtle Point, Nehalem, Newberg, Newport, North Bend, North Plains, Nyssa, Oakridge, Ontario, Oregon City, Pendleton, Philomath, Phoenix, Pilot Rock, Port Orford, Portland, Prescott, Prineville, Rainier, Redmond, Reedsport, Rivergrove, Rockaway Beach, Rogue River, Roseburg, Rufus, Saint Helens, Salem, Sandy, Scappoose, Scio, Scotts Mills, Seaside, Shady Cove, Shaniko, Sheridan, Sherwood, Silverton, Sisters, Sodaville, Spray, Springfield, Stanfield, Stayton, Sublimity, Sutherlin, Sweet Home, Talent, Tangent, The Dalles, Tigard, Tillamook, Toledo, Troutdale, Tualatin, Turner, Ukiah, Umatilla, Vale, Veneta, Vernonia, Warrenton, Wasco, Waterloo, West Linn, Westfir, Weston, Wheeler, Willamina, Wilsonville, Winston, Wood Village, Woodburn, Yamhill. Counties: Baker County, Benton County, Clackamas County, Clatsop County, Columbia County, Coos County, Crook County, Curry County, Deschutes County, Douglas County, Harney County, Hood River County, Jackson County, Jefferson County, Josephine County, Klamath County, Lane County, Lincoln County, Linn County, Malheur County, Marion County, Multnomah County, Polk County, Sherman County, Tillamook County, Umatilla County, Union County, Wasco County, Washington County, Wheeler County, Yamhill County. R emaining jurisdictions either chose not to share data to incorporate into the public, statewide dataset or did not respond to DLCD’s request for data. These jurisdictions’ attributes are designated “not shared” in the orZDesc field and “NS” in the orZCode field.
Facebook
TwitterThis geographic feature data is a product of the 76th Oregon Legislative Session Redistricting process. These are the approved House districts. Every 10 years the Legislature is tasked with reassigning census units to new districts to balance the population. There are two House districts nested in one Senate district. Each Senate district is numbered by sequential House districts (Senate 1 consists of House 1 & 2).These boundaries are subject court challenge until August 1, 2011. Verify district accuracy by checking with the Oregon Secretary of State's Office or Oregon Department of Administrative Services- Geospatial Enterprise Office before conducting any legally binding analysis.
Facebook
TwitterMap showing public lands in Jackson County. The map document is 34 inches by 44 inches.
Facebook
TwitterBuilding footprints are polygon features which represent the 'envelope' of structures in Jackson County. The layer is maintained by several different organizations in Jackson County. Footprints are drawn from most current available aerial imagery. In rural areas, imagery may lack clarity and be dated.
Facebook
TwitterEach property in Jackson County must be classified according to its taxable status and property type. Oregon Administrative Rule 150-308.215 contains the basic property class codes that the Assessor’s Office must use to classify property. Correct classification ensures that property receives the correct annual adjustment or exemption from taxation. In Oregon, the basic property classes are:0. Miscellaneous 1. Residential 2. Commercial 3. Industrial 4. Tract 5. Farm 6. Forest7. Multi-family 8. Recreation9. Exempt
Facebook
TwitterThis dataset represents the livestock districts located in Jackson County, Oregon. A livestock district is an area where livestock (cattle, horses, donkeys, mules, sheep, and goats) are not permitted to run free but, rather, an owner is required to keep the livestock on their property. Though all incorporates cities are livestock districts, this does not necessarily mean livestock is not permitted in these areas. Local zoning regulations governed whether or not livestock may be permitted on certain lands. If livestock is found to be running at large in a livestock district, the livestock owner may be prosecuted for violation of Oregon law.
Facebook
TwitterThe DSL SWI Soils dataset represents two selected subsets of the USDA NRCS gNATSGO dataset for Oregon. The “SWI Predominantly Hydric Soil Map Units” layer represents soil map units that are comprised of greater than 50 percent hydric soil components. The Agate-Winlo Soil Map Units layer is associated with vernal pools in Jackson County. These two subsets indicate areas where unmapped wetlands may be present for the purpose of planning, scoping projects, and coordination with DSL.The gridded National Soil Survey Geographic Database (gNATSGO) is a USDA-NRCS-SPSD composite database that provides complete coverage of the best available soils information for all areas of the United States and Island Territories. It was created by combining data from the Soil Survey Geographic Database (SSURGO), State Soil Geographic Database (STATSGO2), and Raster Soil Survey Databases (RSS) into a single seamless ESRI file geodatabase.Consult the gNATSGO home page for more information: https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/gridded-national-soil-survey-geographic-database-gnatsgo and the web soil survey: http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.NRCS description of SSURGO Database:The SSURGO database contains information about soil as collected by the National Cooperative Soil Survey over the course of a century. The information can be displayed in tables or as maps and is available for most areas in the United States and the Territories, Commonwealths, and Island Nations served by the USDA-NRCS. The information was gathered by walking over the land and observing the soil. Many soil samples were analyzed in laboratories. The maps outline areas called map units. The map units describe soils and other components that have unique properties, interpretations, and productivity. The information was collected at scales ranging from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. More details were gathered at a scale of 1:12,000 than at a scale of 1:63,360. The mapping is intended for natural resource planning and management by landowners, townships, and counties. Some knowledge of soils data and map scale is necessary to avoid misunderstandings.The maps are linked in the database to information about the component soils and their properties for each map unit. Each map unit may contain one to three major components and some minor components. The map units are typically named for the major components. Examples of information available from the database include available water capacity, soil reaction, electrical conductivity, and frequency of flooding; yields for cropland, woodland, rangeland, and pastureland; and limitations affecting recreational development, building site development, and other engineering uses.SSURGO datasets consist of map data, tabular data, and information about how the maps and tables were created. The extent of a SSURGO dataset is a soil survey area, which may consist of a single county, multiple counties, or parts of multiple counties. SSURGO map data can be viewed in the Web Soil Survey or downloaded in ESRI® Shapefile format. The coordinate systems are Geographic. Attribute data can be downloaded in text format that can be imported into a Microsoft® Access® database.https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/soil-survey-geographic-database-ssurgoNRCS description of STATSGO2 Database:The Digital General Soil Map of the United States or STATSGO2 is a broad-based inventory of soils and non-soil areas that occur in a repeatable pattern on the landscape and that can be cartographically shown at the scale mapped of 1:250,000 in the continental U.S., Hawaii, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands and 1:1,000,000 in Alaska. The level of mapping is designed for broad planning and management uses covering state, regional, and multi-state areas. The U.S. General Soil Map is comprised of general soil association units and is maintained and distributed as a spatial and tabular dataset.The U.S. General Soil Map was developed by the National Cooperative Soil Survey and supersedes the State Soil Geographic (STATSGO) dataset. The dataset was created by generalizing more detailed soil survey maps. Where more detailed soil survey maps were not available, data on geology, topography, vegetation, and climate were assembled and related to Land Remote Sensing Satellite (LANDSAT) images. Soils of similar areas were studied, and the probable classification and extent of the soils were determined.Map unit composition was determined by transecting or sampling areas on the more detailed maps and then statistically expanding the data to characterize the whole map unit.The dataset consists of georeferenced, vector and tabular data. The map data were collected in 1- by 2-degree topographic quadrangle units and merged into a seamless national dataset. The dataset is distributed in state, territorial, and national extents. The spatial units are linked to attributes in the tabular data, which give the proportionate extent of the component soils and their properties.The tabular data contains estimates of physical and chemical soil properties, soil interpretations, and static and dynamic metadata. Most of the tabular data exists in the database as a range of values for soil properties. The values depict the range for the geographic extent of the map unit. For most properties, the data include high, low, and representative values.Spatial data are available in ESRI® shapefile format. Spatial reference is decimal degrees, World Geodetic System 1984 (WGS84). Tabular data are available as ASCII text files (.txt). Fields are pipe delimited, and text is double-quote delimited. A Microsoft® Access® template database is available for use with the tabular data.https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/resources/data-and-reports/description-of-statsgo2-databaseCitation: Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online at. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/
Facebook
TwitterThis map shows fire fuels treatment projects in Jackson County and is Map 13 in the Community Fire Plan. The Page size is 11 inches by 17 inches.
Facebook
TwitterThis data is replacing - Driveways x - OverviewDriveway centerlines and access routes to structures and site addresses to supplement the County's existing road centerlines database. Driveways and primary access routes were digitized for all building outlines in the current County GIS except those directly adjacent to and directly accessed from the nearest road centerline. Structures were considered to be "directly adjacent" to a road if they were within approximately 75 to 100 feet of the GIS road centerline. Features were digitized from aerial photography. Review and maintenance is performed with most current aerial imagery. No field verification or other research was conducted to verify location of driveways in obscured areas or that driveways shown are drivable or free of obstacles. The surface type for features are best guess from aerial imagery or local knowledge, however, such data may not be entered and maintained and may be removed. Parking vector data represents only a generalized route intended to show primary access from County road centerlines.
Facebook
TwitterThis data set represents Voter Precinct boundaries for Jackson County. These data are maintained by Jackson County GIS in coordination with Elections as annexations and redistricting occur. This dataset went through a major revision in 2017 where most of the precincts were renumbered. To view precinct boundaries from before 2017. Please see this dataset.