This data represents the graphic portrayal of land parcels and their spatial relationships throughout York County, South Carolina. Land parcel boundaries are also the basis for and define coincident boundaries for other layers, such as zoning, subdivisions, public safety response (ORI -Police, Fire, EMS) and Jurisdiction.Boundaries are established from a variety of sources including cadastral plats, subdivision plats, deeds, land contracts, right-of-way plats, and others. Each feature represents a parcel of land that is inventoried by a unique identifier, referred to as a “Tax Map Id” number. This dataset also includes multi-unit structures which have separate tax accounts for each unit, such as condominium units, represented as stacked polygon features. The parent parcel number [ParentTaxID] for the land parcel is distinguished from the child parcel [TaxMapID] for the condo unit. This data does not include mobile home data. Attributes include data stored within the Esri Fabric data model combined with those from the CAMA data. Examples of relevant attributes include:the [TaxMapID], [ParcelID] and [AprAccNum] can be used to uniquely identify each parcel. the [MailAddr1], [MailAddr2], [MailApt], [MailCity], [MailState], [MailZip] can be used as the full tax billing address for the owner.The [Owner1], [Owner2], [Owner3] describe the owner.the [YearBuilt] offers the oldest year a building was built on the property, reference this web map for info on potential lead pipes on premises;the area of the parcel in acres [GISSizeAC] as calculated from the parcel geometry and also the [deededAcres] from recorded documents, and ;the date that the parcel boundary was last edited [DATE_MODIFIED].How were parcels compiled? This layer was initially developed as an ink-on-mylar property maps maintained by the County from the early 1970's through around 2001.In the 1990s, the county procured services to convert parcels from source documents, however the product delivered in 2000 used a methodology which lost fidelity of source documents. Since then, county staff adhered to this same methodology in their daily work. Between 2001 and 2015 staff used an Esri topology to maintain parcel data in ArcMap. In 2015 the county migrated to Parcel Fabric (ArcMap) and then in 2021 to Pro (2.6/10.8.1 Enterprise) Parcel Fabric. In May of 2021 the county began outsourcing maintenance of parcel edits. This has worked well and was initiated in part to ensure a higher standard of editing practice was adhered to, but also to fulfil a shortage of skilled staff in the job market. County parcel mapping staff remain responsible for simple transactions (merge, split), compilation of materials to create vendor edit request task, and QC or review of vendor work. In Q4 2021, County Staff performed a needs assessment to review alignment issues between parcels and other layers and the internal business requirements for data alignment to parcels. They determined boundary layers must remain coincident with parcels, which are used in decision making by citizens and across many areas of government. Also, it was determined that our parcels had many errors from 20 years of edits in a non-Fabric data model and the previous editing practices. The county will be remapping parcels using ARP grant funding in the 2023-2024 timeframe. Upon delivery in 2024, data maintenance practices will ensure ongoing alignment with parcels.Year BuiltTo obtain the year built for structures on a property, use the 'Buildings' table available through our open data portal.Once you have downloaded the 'Buildings' table and this parcels layer, consider processing the building records in some way to join or perform a relate as there could be many buildings on one parcel, using the following fields:Parcel.AprAccNum = BuildingTable.PropertyID(Note: 98,227 parcels have 1 building, 647 parcels have 2 buildings, 272 have 3 or more)Data SchemaReview the Parcel schema document (PDF) to gain a better understand of the data fields. Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
An address point represents a geographic location that has been assigned an address by the local address authority (i.e., county or municipality) but does not necessarily receive mail from the US Postal Service (USPS). Address points may include several pieces of information about the structure or location that’s being mapped, such as:[WHOLE_ADDRESS] the full address (i.e., the USPS mailing address, if the address is for a physical location [rather than a PO box]);the type of unit [UNIT_TYPE] and unit [UNIT];the city or zip community [POST_COMM] and ZIP code POST_CODE;the vacancy status (occupied, vacant, meter) [OccupiedUseStatus]; andthe date that the address point was created [DATE_CREATED] and last edited [DATE_MODIFIED].These data were originally created for Public Safety e911 response in 2001 through field survey by county staff and is mapping grade. Today it is used throughout the County and by the public to conduct business and assist in decision making. This feature service is updated daily from its source ArcGIS Enterprise feature class. Source data within an Enterprise Geodatabase is accessed by County and City of Rock Hill staff through ArcGIS Server and Portal. When edited, business rules are enforced by BCS theAddresser software. York County has an Address Manual used by staff and stakeholders to ensure quality and standards are adhered to during maintenance and use.These data are shared through open data and available for download. York County addresses are included in the National Address Database (USDOT NAD). The NAD is consumed by Google as highlighted in their Maps Content Partners 2022 November Newsletter. York County is one of 13 counties added in 2022. Access the NAD through the ArcGIS Online Living Atlas.As of October 2022, the schema of these data are compatible with NG911. Previous schema remains as of January 2023 with intent to remove fields tentatively planned for 2024. Review the schema field mapping document (PDF) to gain a better understanding of field mapping used to transition these data to NG911 standards.
Road segments within this layer represent centerlines of public and private (not gated) roadways. Road segments define left (_L) and right (_R) side attributes and address ranges along the segment. Additional attribute information may include:The full street name ST_DIR_NAM;the city or zip community [POSTCOMM_L]; The ZIP code POSTCODE_L; The jurisdiction (Incorporated Municipality) the segment is within [INCMUNI_L];The functional classification [F_CLASS] used; (ex: Interstate, Major Collector, Minor Arterial, Local)The route number [RT_NUM] containing a county road or highway number;The road maintenance provider or construction status [ST_OWNER];Fields used in routing [MPH, ONEWAY, _ELEV, _IM] and; the date that the road segment was created [DATE_CREATED] and last edited [DATE_MODIFIED].This information is was originally compiled from orthophotography in 2001 for use in Public Safety e911 response. Today it is used throughout the County and by the public to conduct business and assist in decision making.County and City staff update records daily or as needed (such as through subdivision plan review and approval using georeferenced CAD files provided by land developers). The road centerlines support address geocoding, analysis, routing and mapping.The centerline represents the geographic location on the roadway between both shoulders (physical center), which often, but not always coincides with the center painted line dividing bi-directional travel lanes. Roadway centerline data plays an important role in transportation management and planning, while also being the basis for all other roadway-related data products.This feature service is updated daily from its source ArcGIS Enterprise feature class. Source data within an Enterprise Geodatabase is accessed by County and City of Rock Hill staff through ArcGIS Server and Portal. When edited, business rules are enforced by BCS theAddresser software. York County has an Address Manual used by staff and stakeholders to ensure quality and standards are adhered to during maintenance and use.For additional information about county maintained roadways, review the County Road Inventory data or search for data through One Map. County staff maintain the relationship between streets and the County Road Inventory through the RT_NUM field. The street ownership [ST_OWNER] designation serves as a source to determine the maintenance provider by municipal public works agencies who actively manage the road assets. SCDOT roadways can be confirmed by reviewing data within their lookup application or their source data within our One Map application.Railroads are contained within the streets feature class to enable cross street lookup (geodcoding), a requirement for e911 dispatchers.Street segments outside the county are present for cartographic and Public Safety dispatch of nearest vehicle (routing) purposes. These can be filtered out and removedAddressing data (streets and addresses) are used to update the US Census Bureau Tiger data in support of the decennial census. As of October 2022, the schema of these data are compatible with NG911. Previous schema remains as of January 2023 with intent to remove fields tentatively planned for 2024. Review the schema field mapping document (PDF) to gain a better understanding of field mapping used to transition these data to NG911 standards. Continuing NG911 compliance projects include splitting the centerline as they cross the city limit. To assist York County, South Carolina in the maintenance of the data, please provide any information concerning discovered errors, omissions, or other discrepancies found in the data. Data Owner: County IT/GIS, Addressing Staff and City of Rock Hill.Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
These data are part of an ongoing project to map all trails within York County. Data collection is managed by Office of Emergency Management and updated sporadically. Begun Q4 2021.Access the file geodatabase source data in the SC State Plane coordinate system
To view this map and search for a road in context of an application, visit One Map, click on search roads or click here to access directly.Note: This AGOL View item has 11 fields hidden.(Replaces HFV)Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
The 2010 districts will continue to be effective until the next Council takes office in January 2023.The 2020 districts are effective as of February 7, 2022 for use in preparing for the 2022 elections.++++ ACTIONS ● FEBRUARY 7, 2022AMENDED AND GAVE THIRD READING OF AN ORDINANCE TO REDISTRICT AND REDEFINE THE VOTING DISTRICTS WITHIN YORK COUNTY THROUGH REAPPORTIONMENT, AS TO POPULATION, OF THE SEVEN SINGLE-MEMBER ELECTORAL DISTRICTS WITHIN THE COUNTY FOR THE ELECTION OF MEMBERS OF YORK COUNTY COUNCIL PURSUANT TO THE UNITED STATES CENSUS OF 2020 AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 4-9-90 OF THE SOUTH CAROLINA CODE OF LAWS, 1976, AS AMENDED; TO AMEND SECTION 11.04 OF THE YORK COUNTY CODE TO CODIFY THE BLOCK INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE NEW DISTRICTING; AND TO ADOPT THE CONFORMING REDISTRICTING MAP; AND TO PROVIDE FOR OTHER MATTERS RELATING TO THE REDISTRICTING AND REAPPORTIONMENT OF COUNTY COUNCIL DISTRICTS IN YORK COUNTY.+++++Council Minutes and ActionFeb 7, 2022 Meeting Detail and Action Item 6686Feb 7 Meeting Minutes include reference to the Clover Amendment.(8:42pm) Motion to approve third reading of the Redistricting Ordinance with the amendment beforeCouncil bringing the 5 census blocks to the north of the Calabash Branch back into District 2 andcorrespondingly adjusting and adopting the revised map and census block information to reflect theboundary change, with all other aspects of the Redistricting plan and block information approved atsecond reading remaining the same.
Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
Meeting minutes from January 9, 2023 where these boundaries were approved can be found here.Town staff has been working with the South Carolina Revenue and Fiscal Affairs office (SCRFA) to study and plan for the redistricting of the Town Council’s wards based upon the results of the 2020 Decennial Census. SCRFA first developed a Redistricting Benchmark Report, which staff presented to Council on March 14, 2022. The report outlines the current demographics of the existing Council ward geographies and discusses the path forward to developing a new ward map. After receiving input, staff reached back out to SCRFA to begin the process of developing a draft map for public review. The draft map is attached. The map was developed utilizing the following traditional redistricting principles:Wards will be drawn contiguously, so that all parts of the district or ward are connected to each other. Wards will be drawn to minimize the division of voting precincts. Wards will be geographically compact to the extent practicable, such that nearby areas of population are not bypassed for a more distant population. Wards will be drawn to comply with other applicable court decisions and federal and state laws. Wards will be drawn, when feasible, with respect to existing districts and communities of interests, which will require input from Council and the citizens.Wards will be drawn to give careful consideration to minority districts for compliance with Section 2 criteria of the Voting Rights Act Wards will be drawn to a deviation range of 5%The adoption process follows the normal ordinance adoption process, which requires two readings and one public hearing. The public hearing is tentatively set for Council’s first meeting in January.
Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
Hydrants are part of the water systems maintained by various entities in York County. They are primarily serviced by the fire agency within the jurisdiction the hydrant is found in. The hydrants are provided to 911 dispatchers for use during an emergency, to relay nearest and best available to vehicles while on route to call. Apps and web maps:Hydrant Search, report for each hydrant, report by districtWeb map for Hydrant SearchFire hydrants within the County jurisdiction are inspected and maintained by York County Fire staff. Access to maintain hydrants in cities by City staff has been granted in previous years (using map service functionality, users are restricted from editing hydrants they did not create). At end of year, for ISO to use during their review, a report by district is obtained. This report is available for each district through the hydrants app. Having inspection reports yearly results in max points. Typically, once all hydrants in a district have been inspected in a year, the report is printed and stored for ISO to reference. County Fire staff also capture a shapefile of the hydrants yearly, from the open data site.630 INSPECTION AND FIRE FLOW TESTING OF HYDRANTS:A. Inspection (HI):Inspection of hydrants should be in accordance with AWWA manual M17, Installation, Field Testing, and Maintenance of Fire Hydrants. The frequency of inspection is the average time interval between the 3 most recent inspections.Assign points for frequency of inspection (FI) according to the following:Frequency of Inspection (FI) Points1 year 302 years 203 years 104 years 55 years or more No creditAccess the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate systemUpdate History:3/6/24 - first draft
This item view references FloodZone layer and displays 100 and 500 year flood boundary categories.The S_Fld_Haz_Ar table contains information about the flood hazards within the study area. A spatial file with locational information also corresponds with this data table. These zones are used by the federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to designate the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and for insurance rating purposes. These data are the flood hazard areas that are or will be depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). A spatial file with locational information also corresponds with this data table. Source DFIRM: S_FLD_HAZ_ARThis layer was download from the FEMA Flood Map Service Center (latest study effective date of 5/16/2017)To download, use the following; State: SC, County: York County, Community: [select any]Direct Link to download source (working as of 10/10/2022)Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
** THIS IS NOT THE MOST CURRENT FLOOD HAZARD MAP **This data has been replaced by the Flood Hazard Zone Areas (DFIRM 2017) [or more recent]This layer contains information about the flood hazards within the study area, specifically the floodway, defined by an attribute filter. These zones are used by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to designate the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) and for insurance rating purposes. These data are the regulatory flood hazard areas that are or will be depicted on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The spatial elements representing flood zones are polygons. There is one polygon for each contiguous flood zone designated. Source DFIRM FC: S_FLD_HAZ_ARThis layer was download from the FEMA Flood Map Service Center (study effective date of 2008)Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
This data represents the graphic portrayal of land parcels and their spatial relationships throughout York County, South Carolina. Land parcel boundaries are also the basis for and define coincident boundaries for other layers, such as zoning, subdivisions, public safety response (ORI -Police, Fire, EMS) and Jurisdiction.Boundaries are established from a variety of sources including cadastral plats, subdivision plats, deeds, land contracts, right-of-way plats, and others. Each feature represents a parcel of land that is inventoried by a unique identifier, referred to as a “Tax Map Id” number. This dataset also includes multi-unit structures which have separate tax accounts for each unit, such as condominium units, represented as stacked polygon features. The parent parcel number [ParentTaxID] for the land parcel is distinguished from the child parcel [TaxMapID] for the condo unit. This data does not include mobile home data. Attributes include data stored within the Esri Fabric data model combined with those from the CAMA data. Examples of relevant attributes include:the [TaxMapID], [ParcelID] and [AprAccNum] can be used to uniquely identify each parcel. the [MailAddr1], [MailAddr2], [MailApt], [MailCity], [MailState], [MailZip] can be used as the full tax billing address for the owner.The [Owner1], [Owner2], [Owner3] describe the owner.the [YearBuilt] offers the oldest year a building was built on the property, reference this web map for info on potential lead pipes on premises;the area of the parcel in acres [GISSizeAC] as calculated from the parcel geometry and also the [deededAcres] from recorded documents, and ;the date that the parcel boundary was last edited [DATE_MODIFIED].How were parcels compiled? This layer was initially developed as an ink-on-mylar property maps maintained by the County from the early 1970's through around 2001.In the 1990s, the county procured services to convert parcels from source documents, however the product delivered in 2000 used a methodology which lost fidelity of source documents. Since then, county staff adhered to this same methodology in their daily work. Between 2001 and 2015 staff used an Esri topology to maintain parcel data in ArcMap. In 2015 the county migrated to Parcel Fabric (ArcMap) and then in 2021 to Pro (2.6/10.8.1 Enterprise) Parcel Fabric. In May of 2021 the county began outsourcing maintenance of parcel edits. This has worked well and was initiated in part to ensure a higher standard of editing practice was adhered to, but also to fulfil a shortage of skilled staff in the job market. County parcel mapping staff remain responsible for simple transactions (merge, split), compilation of materials to create vendor edit request task, and QC or review of vendor work. In Q4 2021, County Staff performed a needs assessment to review alignment issues between parcels and other layers and the internal business requirements for data alignment to parcels. They determined boundary layers must remain coincident with parcels, which are used in decision making by citizens and across many areas of government. Also, it was determined that our parcels had many errors from 20 years of edits in a non-Fabric data model and the previous editing practices. The county will be remapping parcels using ARP grant funding in the 2023-2024 timeframe. Upon delivery in 2024, data maintenance practices will ensure ongoing alignment with parcels.Year BuiltTo obtain the year built for structures on a property, use the 'Buildings' table available through our open data portal.Once you have downloaded the 'Buildings' table and this parcels layer, consider processing the building records in some way to join or perform a relate as there could be many buildings on one parcel, using the following fields:Parcel.AprAccNum = BuildingTable.PropertyID(Note: 98,227 parcels have 1 building, 647 parcels have 2 buildings, 272 have 3 or more)Data SchemaReview the Parcel schema document (PDF) to gain a better understand of the data fields. Access the file geodatabase source data in SC State Plane coordinate system