The size of the GIS Mapping Tools market was valued at USD XXX million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of XX % during the forecast period.

Discover the booming GIS mapping tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals a $15B market in 2025 projected to reach $39B by 2033, driven by cloud adoption, AI integration, and surging demand across sectors. Explore key trends, leading companies (Esri, ArcGIS, QGIS, etc.), and regional growth forecasts.

The booming GIS Mapping Tools market is projected to reach $45 billion by 2033, driven by cloud adoption and AI. Explore market trends, key players (Esri, Autodesk, Hexagon), and regional growth in this comprehensive analysis.

The Digital Geomorphic-GIS Map of Gulf Islands National Seashore (5-meter accuracy and 1-foot resolution 2006-2007 mapping), Mississippi and Florida is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (guis_geomorphology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (guis_geomorphology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (guis_geomorphology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (guis_geomorphology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the guis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (guis_geomorphology_metadata.txt or guis_geomorphology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:26,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 13.2 meters or 43.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

Discover the booming GIS Mapping Tools market! Explore key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies in this $15 billion industry projected to reach $28 billion by 2033. Learn about cloud-based solutions, regional market shares, and the future of geographic information systems.

The Global GIS Mapping Tools Market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach a substantial market size of $10 billion by 2025, with an anticipated Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 12.5% through 2033. This robust growth trajectory is fueled by the increasing demand for advanced spatial analysis and visualization capabilities across a multitude of sectors. Key drivers include the escalating need for accurate geological exploration to identify and manage natural resources, the critical role of GIS in planning and executing complex water conservancy projects for sustainable water management, and the indispensable application of GIS in urban planning for efficient city development and infrastructure management. Furthermore, the burgeoning adoption of cloud-based and web-based GIS solutions is democratizing access to powerful mapping tools, enabling broader use by organizations of all sizes. The market is also benefiting from advancements in data processing, artificial intelligence integration, and the growing availability of open-source GIS platforms. Despite the optimistic outlook, certain restraints could temper the market's full potential. High initial investment costs for sophisticated GIS software and hardware, coupled with a shortage of skilled GIS professionals in certain regions, may pose challenges. However, the overwhelming benefits of enhanced decision-making, improved operational efficiency, and the ability to gain deep insights from spatial data are compelling organizations to overcome these hurdles. The competitive landscape is dynamic, featuring established players like Esri and Autodesk alongside innovative providers such as Mapbox and CARTO, all vying for market share by offering specialized features, user-friendly interfaces, and integrated solutions. The continuous evolution of GIS technology, driven by the integration of remote sensing data, big data analytics, and real-time information, will continue to shape the market's future. Here's a comprehensive report description on GIS Mapping Tools, incorporating your specified requirements:

This in-depth report provides a panoramic view of the global GIS Mapping Tools market, meticulously analyzing its landscape from the Historical Period (2019-2024) through to the Forecast Period (2025-2033), with 2025 serving as both the Base Year and the Estimated Year. The study period encompasses 2019-2033, offering a robust historical context and forward-looking projections. The market is valued in the millions of US dollars, with detailed segment-specific valuations and growth trajectories. The report is structured to deliver actionable intelligence to stakeholders, covering market concentration, key trends, regional dominance, product insights, and critical industry dynamics. It delves into the intricate interplay of companies such as Esri, Hexagon, Autodesk, CARTO, and Mapbox, alongside emerging players like Geoway and Shenzhen Edraw Software, across diverse applications including Geological Exploration, Water Conservancy Projects, and Urban Planning. The analysis also differentiates between Cloud Based and Web Based GIS solutions, providing a granular understanding of market segmentation.

Market Research Intellect's GIS Mapping Software Market Report highlights a valuation of USD 3.2 billion in 2024 and anticipates growth to USD 6.5 billion by 2033, with a CAGR of 8.5% from 2026-2033.Explore insights on demand dynamics, innovation pipelines, and competitive landscapes.

This mapping tool provides a representation of the general watershed boundaries for stream systems declared fully appropriated by the State Water Board. The boundaries were created by Division of Water Rights staff by delineating FASS critical reaches and consolidating HUC 12 sub-watersheds to form FASS Watershed boundaries. As such, the boundaries are in most cases conservative with respect to the associated stream system. However, users should check neighboring FASS Watersheds to ensure the stream system of interest is not restricted by other FASS listings. For more information regarding the Declaration of Fully Appropriated Stream Systems, visit the Division of Water Rights’ Fully Appropriated Streams webpage. How to Use the Interactive Mapping Tool: If it is your first time viewing the map, you will need to click the “OK” box on the splash screen and agree to the disclaimer before continuing. Navigate to your point of interest by either using the search bar or by zooming in on the map. You may enter a stream name, street address, or watershed ID in the search bar. Click on the map to identify the location of interest and one or more pop-up boxes may appear with information about the fully appropriated stream systems within the general watershed boundaries of the identified location. The information provided in the pop-up box may include: (a) stream name, (b) tributary, (c) season declared fully appropriated, (d) Board Decisions/Water Right Orders, and/or (e) court references/adjudications. You may toggle the FAS Streams reference layer on and off to find representative critical reaches associated with the FASS Watershed layer. Please note that this layer is for general reference purposes only and ultimately the critical reach listed in Appendix A of Water Rights Order 98-08 and Appendix A together with any associated footnotes controls. Note: A separate FAS Watershed boundary layer was created for the Bay-Delta Watershed. The Bay-Delta Watershed layer should be toggled on to check if the area of interest is fully appropriated under State Water Board Decision 1594.

The size of the GIS Mapping Software market was valued at USD XXX million in 2024 and is projected to reach USD XXX million by 2033, with an expected CAGR of XX % during the forecast period.

Discover the booming GIS Mapping Tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals key trends, growth drivers, and leading companies shaping the future of spatial data. Explore market size, CAGR, regional insights, and application segments (Geological Exploration, Urban Planning, etc.). Learn how cloud-based solutions are revolutionizing GIS.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of San Miguel Island, California is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (smis_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (smis_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (smis_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (chis_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (chis_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (smis_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the chis_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (smis_geology_metadata.txt or smis_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

1) Use the search tool to find where you go to school or work2) Measure the distance you travel to school or work

The “DTPW Permit GIS Mapping Tool Web Map” serves as the foundational map for the DTPW Permit GIS Mapping Application—a public application for submitting, editing, and reviewing transportation permits within Miami-Dade County.Key Functions:

Provides editors with an intuitive map-based interface for adding and updating permit records. Incorporates Arcade expressions in the Editor forms to automatically populate address and intersection fields. Serves as the primary workspace for editing permit data before it's integrated into other DTPW workflows.Editable Feature Layers (For Permit Data Collection and Updates):

Add a Point Arcade Function: Automatically populates the address field by finding the nearest parcel from the Property Boundary layer within 60 meters.

Add a Segment Arcade Function: Populates start and end address fields by retrieving nearby intersection names from the GeoIntersection layer within a 25-meter buffer.

Add a Polygon Arcade Function: Populates address fields by identifying the nearest intersections for each of the polygon’s four corner vertices, using the GeoIntersection layer.

Reference Data Layers (For Spatial Validation and Data Extraction):

Property Boundary

Parcel boundaries containing address information. Used to support the automated address population for point permits.

GeoIntersection

A dataset of intersection points and names. Used to populate intersection-related fields in both segment and polygon permits.

Discover the booming interactive map creation tools market! This in-depth analysis reveals a $2.5 billion market in 2025, projected to reach $8 billion by 2033, driven by cloud-based solutions and growing data visualization needs. Learn about key players, market segmentation, and regional trends shaping this exciting sector.

Discover the booming GIS mapping tools market! Explore market size, growth trends (8% CAGR), key players (Esri, QGIS, ArcGIS), and regional insights. Learn how cloud-based GIS and AI are transforming industries like urban planning and geological exploration. Get the latest data and forecasts for 2025-2033.

eXtension Foundation, the University of New Hampshire, and Virginia Tech have developed a mapping and data exploration tool to assist Cooperative Extension staff and administrators in making strategic planning and programming decisions. The tool, called the National Extension Web-mapping Tool (or NEWT), is the key in efforts to make spatial data available within cooperative extension system. NEWT requires no GIS experience to use. NEWT provides access for CES staff and administrators to relevant spatial data at a variety of scales (national, state, county) in useful formats (maps, tables, graphs), all without the need for any experience or technical skills in Geographic Information System (GIS) software. By providing consistent access to relevant spatial data throughout the country in a format useful to CES staff and administrators, NEWT represents a significant advancement for the use of spatial technology in CES. Users of the site will be able to discover the data layers which are of most interest to them by making simple, guided choices about topics related to their work. Once the relevant data layers have been chosen, a mapping interface will allow the exploration of spatial relationships and the creation and export of maps. Extension areas to filter searches include 4-H Youth & Family, Agriculture, Business, Community, Food & Health, and Natural Resources. Users will also be able to explore data by viewing data tables and graphs. This Beta release is open for public use and feedback. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Website Pointer to NEWT National Extension Web-mapping Tool Beta. File Name: Web Page, url: https://www.mapasyst.org/newt/ The site leads the user through the process of selecting the data in which they would be most interested, then provides a variety of ways for the user to explore the data (maps, graphs, tables).

Equipment GIS Mapping for Facilities Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Equipment GIS Mapping for Facilities market size reached USD 3.1 billion in 2024, reflecting robust expansion driven by digital transformation across facility management sectors. The market is experiencing a healthy growth trajectory, with a projected CAGR of 10.7% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is forecasted to attain a value of USD 7.7 billion. This significant growth is attributed to the rising need for real-time spatial intelligence, enhanced asset management, and the integration of advanced geospatial technologies within various facility types. As organizations increasingly prioritize operational efficiency and data-driven decision-making, the adoption of GIS mapping solutions for facilities is expected to accelerate across diverse end-user verticals.

The primary growth factor fueling the Equipment GIS Mapping for Facilities market is the intensifying demand for integrated asset management and space optimization across both public and private sectors. Facility managers are under mounting pressure to maximize resource utilization, reduce operational costs, and ensure regulatory compliance. GIS mapping platforms provide a comprehensive, visualized inventory of assets, infrastructure, and spatial layouts, enabling data-driven planning and real-time monitoring. The ability to overlay facility data with geographic information empowers stakeholders to proactively manage maintenance schedules, rapidly locate equipment, and streamline emergency response. As a result, industries such as healthcare, education, government, and commercial real estate are increasingly investing in GIS mapping solutions to elevate their facility management practices.

Another significant driver is the rapid technological advancements in GIS software and hardware, coupled with the proliferation of cloud-based deployment models. Modern GIS solutions now offer robust integration capabilities with IoT devices, building management systems, and enterprise resource planning platforms. This seamless interoperability allows for the aggregation and analysis of vast datasets, supporting predictive analytics and automation. The shift towards cloud deployment is particularly notable, as it reduces upfront infrastructure costs, enhances scalability, and facilitates remote access to facility data. These innovations are making GIS mapping tools more accessible and cost-effective for organizations of all sizes, further propelling market growth.

Furthermore, the growing emphasis on sustainability, security, and emergency preparedness is amplifying the adoption of GIS mapping for facilities. Organizations are leveraging GIS to monitor energy consumption, optimize space usage, and implement green building initiatives. In addition, GIS mapping supports comprehensive security and emergency planning by providing real-time visualization of facility layouts, evacuation routes, and critical infrastructure. This holistic approach to facility management not only enhances occupant safety but also aligns with broader ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) goals. The convergence of these trends is expected to sustain the upward momentum of the Equipment GIS Mapping for Facilities market over the forecast period.

Regionally, North America dominates the Equipment GIS Mapping for Facilities market, accounting for the largest revenue share in 2024, followed closely by Europe and Asia Pacific. The market in North America is characterized by early technology adoption, a mature facility management ecosystem, and significant investments in smart building initiatives. Europe is witnessing steady growth, driven by stringent regulatory requirements and a strong focus on sustainability. Meanwhile, Asia Pacific is emerging as a high-growth region, fueled by rapid urbanization, infrastructure development, and increasing awareness of GIS benefits. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also showing promising potential, albeit at a more nascent stage, as governments and enterprises gradually recognize the value of spatial intelligence in facility management.

The Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Sagamore Hill National Historic Site and Vicinity, New York is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (sahi_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (sahi_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (sahi_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) A GIS readme file (sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (sahi_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the sahi_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (sahi_geology_metadata.txt or sahi_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:62,500 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 31.8 meters or 104.2 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).

LANDISVIEW is a tool, developed at the Knowledge Engineering Laboratory at Texas A&M University, to visualize and animate 8-bit/16-bit ERDAS GIS format (e.g., LANDIS and LANDIS-II output maps). It can also convert 8-bit/16-bit ERDAS GIS format into ASCII and batch files. LANDISVIEW provides two major functions: 1) File Viewer: Files can be viewed sequentially and an output can be generated as a movie file or as an image file. 2) File converter: It will convert the loaded files for compatibility with 3rd party software, such as Fragstats, a widely used spatial analysis tool. Some available features of LANDISVIEW include: 1) Display cell coordinates and values. 2) Apply user-defined color palette to visualize files. 3) Save maps as pictures and animations as video files (*.avi). 4) Convert ERDAS files into ASCII grids for compatibility with Fragstats. (Source: http://kelab.tamu.edu/)

This is a link to the QGIS website where you can download open-source GIS software for viewing, analyzing and manipulating geodata like our downloadable shapefiles.