Facebook
TwitterThe Digital Bedrock Geologic-GIS Map of Minuteman National Historical Site and Vicinity, Massachusetts is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (mima_bedrock_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (mima_bedrock_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (mima_geology.gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (mima_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (mima_bedrock_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the mima_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Boston College and U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (mima_bedrock_geology_metadata.txt or mima_bedrock_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 25.4 meters or 83.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
UniGR cross-border study programme: Erasmus Mundus Master in Language and Communication Technologies (MA) Source: UniGR Link to interactive map: https://map.gis-gr.eu/theme/main?version=3&zoom=8&X=708580&Y=6429642&lang=fr&rotation=0&layers=2240&opacities=1&bgLayer=basemap_2015_global Link to Geocatalog: https://geocatalogue.gis-gr.eu/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/5a4afa26-fa3b-4557-88d5-be6353bd321c This dataset is published in the view service (WMS) available at: https://ws.geoportail.lu/wss/service/GR_Crossborder_programmes_humanities_arts_2023_WMS/guest with layer name(s): -UniGR_Erasmus_Mundus_Master_MA
Facebook
TwitterK.C. Shoreline Management Master Program. Related to SAO wetlands and FEMA floodpln (has boolean attributes floodpln and wetlands).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
UniGR cross-border study programme: Trinational Master in Literary, Cultural and Linguistic History of the German-Speaking World (MA) Source: UniGR Link to interactive map: https://map.gis-gr.eu/theme/main?version=3&zoom=8&X=708580&Y=6429642&lang=fr&rotation=0&layers=2239&opacities=1&bgLayer=basemap_2015_global Link to Geocatalog: https://geocatalogue.gis-gr.eu/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/0dda1840-f3d3-4aac-88dc-d7cd978d6b55 This dataset is published in the view service (WMS) available at: https://ws.geoportail.lu/wss/service/GR_Crossborder_programmes_humanities_arts_2023_WMS/guest with layer name(s): -UniGR_Trinational_Master_MA
Facebook
TwitterThe Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Knife River Indian Villages National Historic Site and Vicinity, North Dakota is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (knri_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro 3.X map file (.mapx) file (knri_geology.mapx) and individual Pro 3.X layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (knri_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (knri_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (knri_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the knri_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: University of North Dakota, Department of Anthropology and Archeology. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (knri_geology_metadata.txt or knri_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 12.2 meters or 40 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).
Facebook
TwitterAbstract: This dataset 'approximately' represents the location of the SMP 200 foot shoreline environments of the Puyallup River and Clarks Creek within the City of Puyallup and its urban growth area.Purpose: This feature class is to be used to 'approximately' locate the 200 foot shoreline environment from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) of the Puyallup River and Clarks Creek. The shoreline environments were created using the Clarks Creek centerline shapefile and Puyallup River polygon shapefile. Because this map was created using the afore mentioned sources (as apposed to the OHWM as required by the SMP), the shoreline evnironments shown here will extend further upland than depicted. As such these shoreline environments should be used as a reference only. Reports and field work conducted by qualified professional biologists are required to determine the true location of the OHWM/200 foot shoreline environment for any property along these waterways. NOTE: The puy_river.shp is a polygon shapefile which extends close to the shoreline but does not mark the OHWM of the river. The clarks_creek_cntr_ln.shp is a line feature class that does not come close to the shoreline of Clarks Creek. The shoreline, not the OHWM, can be anywhere from 20-30 feet on either side of the center line. For these reasons it is imperative to have a biologist establish the OHWM for Clarks Creek and the Puyallup River. Only then can the 200 foot shoreline environment be determined.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
UniGR cross-border study programme: AMASE - Erasmus Mundus Master in Advanced Material Science and Engineering (M.Sc.) Source: UniGR Link to interactive map: https://map.gis-gr.eu/theme/main?version=3&zoom=8&X=708580&Y=6429642&lang=fr&rotation=0&layers=2249&opacities=1&bgLayer=basemap_2015_global Link to Geocatalog: https://geocatalogue.gis-gr.eu/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/7542c173-d6fb-4ffd-82d3-923a3bdf6552 This dataset is published in the view service (WMS) available at: https://ws.geoportail.lu/wss/service/GR_Cross_border_programmes_engineering_manufacturing_constructing_2023_WMS/guest with layer name(s): -UniGR_AMASE_MSc
Facebook
TwitterThe Narcotic Treatment Program Master List contains a list of all state-licensed and certified narcotic treatment programs. The Master List contains vital information for each program listed and additional details, such as the program’s address and contact information, total capacity, hours of operation and program director and medical director.
Facebook
TwitterThe Digital Geologic-GIS Map of Yellowstone National Park and Vicinity, Wyoming, Montana, and Idaho is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) an ESRI file geodatabase (yell_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro 3.X map file (.mapx) file (yell_geology.mapx) and individual Pro 3.X layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) a readme file (yell_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (yell_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (yell_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Also included is a zip containing a Montana State University Master's thesis and supporting documents and data. The thesis focuses on addressing map boundary inconsistencies and remapping portions of the park. Data and documents supporting the thesis are 1.) a geodatabase containing field data points, 2.) a collection of documents describing field sites, 3.) spreadsheets containing geochemical analysis results, and 4.) photographs taken during field work. Please read the yell_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri.htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: U.S. Geological Survey, Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology and Montana State University. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (yell_geology_metadata.txt or yell_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:125,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 63.5 meters or 208.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS Pro, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).
Facebook
TwitterAttribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
UniGR cross-border study programme: Master en sciences et gestion de l'environnement / Master en développement durable Source: UniGR Link to interactive map: https://map.gis-gr.eu/theme/main?version=3&zoom=8&X=708580&Y=6429642&lang=fr&rotation=0&layers=2256&opacities=1&bgLayer=basemap_2015_global Link to Geocatalog: https://geocatalogue.gis-gr.eu/geonetwork/srv/eng/catalog.search#/metadata/064548fb-1ab0-4736-abd5-10d992dfea16 This dataset is published in the view service (WMS) available at: https://ws.geoportail.lu/wss/service/GR_Cross_border_programmes_science_mathematics_computing_2023_WMS/guest with layer name(s): -UniGR_Master_gestion_environnement_dev_durable
Facebook
Twitter
According to our latest research, the global conservation biology field courses market size in 2024 stands at USD 1.42 billion, reflecting the expanding emphasis on environmental education and field-based learning worldwide. The market is experiencing a robust growth trajectory, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.3% projected from 2025 to 2033. By the end of 2033, the market is expected to reach USD 2.68 billion. This notable growth is primarily driven by increasing demand for experiential learning, the critical need for biodiversity conservation, and the integration of technology in field education.
One of the primary growth factors for the conservation biology field courses market is the rising global awareness about biodiversity loss and climate change. As environmental challenges become more complex and urgent, educational institutions, NGOs, and governmental agencies are prioritizing hands-on learning experiences that equip participants with practical conservation skills. This shift toward field-based education is further supported by international frameworks such as the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which emphasize the importance of education in achieving environmental sustainability. Consequently, both undergraduate and graduate programs are increasingly incorporating field courses into their curricula, resulting in heightened enrollment rates and expanding market opportunities.
Another significant driver is the evolution of pedagogical approaches in conservation science. There is a growing recognition that classroom-based theoretical instruction alone is insufficient to address real-world conservation challenges. Field courses provide immersive experiences that foster critical thinking, problem-solving, and collaboration among participants. This educational transformation is not limited to universities; professional development programs and short-term workshops are also gaining traction among early-career scientists, conservation practitioners, and policy makers. The adoption of hybrid and online delivery modes has further democratized access, enabling participants from remote or underserved regions to engage in high-quality field-based learning.
Technological advancements also play a pivotal role in shaping the conservation biology field courses market. The integration of digital tools such as GIS mapping, remote sensing, and mobile data collection platforms has revolutionized fieldwork, making it more efficient and data-driven. These innovations enhance the learning experience, allowing students and professionals to analyze complex ecological data in real time and contribute meaningfully to ongoing conservation projects. Moreover, partnerships between academic institutions, research organizations, and technology providers are fostering the development of cutting-edge curricula that address current and emerging conservation issues, further fueling market growth.
From a regional perspective, North America and Europe currently dominate the conservation biology field courses market, accounting for over 60% of the global market share in 2024. These regions benefit from well-established educational infrastructures, strong funding support, and a mature ecosystem of conservation organizations. However, the Asia Pacific region is emerging as a significant growth engine, driven by rapid biodiversity loss, increasing governmental investment in environmental education, and the expansion of international collaborations. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also witnessing rising interest, particularly in areas with high conservation value and pressing ecological challenges. This regional diversity presents unique opportunities for market players to tailor their offerings to local needs and contexts.
The course type segment in the conservation biology field courses market is broadly categorized into undergraduate, graduate, professional development, and short-te
Facebook
TwitterThese data, which comprise part of the Smithsonian Institution Master Sediment data file, were abstracted by the staff of the Smithsonian Institution from materials submitted for archival by various groups and individuals. Most of the data in this set were collected by the National Ocean Service (NOS, formerly the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey) for the purpose of charting the coastal waters and navigable waterways of the United States. Prior to 1985, the NOS data were released as part of the National Ocean Surveys Hydrographic Database. After 1985, sediment samples collected by NOS during surveys were transferred to the Smithsonian for archival and textural analysis. All of the data in this set were collected post 1985 and have been processed by the Smithsonian. These data were supplied by the National Geophysical Data Center (NGDC), but this data set contains fields that are only a subset of those fields available in the full Smithsonian data set. For example, the data have been clipped to eliminate those stations that were not from the Gulf of Maine, Georges Bank, or the shelf and slope off southeastern New England. Last update of this file was July, 2001.
Facebook
TwitterFor more information about this layer please see the GIS Data Catalog.SMP Environment Designations
Facebook
TwitterThis map shows locations that provide ADN (associate degree nursing), AE-MSN (alternate entry master of science in nursing), Diploma, BSN (bachelor of science in nursing), DE-MSN (direct entry master of science in nursing), and LVN (licensed vocation nursing) certifications. The data includes information on pass rates from 2020 through 2024.This map was created with data from Texas Center for Nursing Workforce Studies and last updated in May 2025.
Facebook
TwitterThis web map contains datasets representing the National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) of Washington State, labels for NHD features, and the Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) basins for Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC) levels 4, 8, and 12. The NHD dataset has been adopted as the Washington State hydrography standard. The NHD is a national framework for assigning reach addresses to water-related entities, such as industrial discharges, drinking water supplies, fish habitat areas, wild and scenic rivers. Reach addresses establish the locations of these entities relative to one another within the NHD surface water drainage network, much like addresses on streets. Once linked to the NHD by their reach addresses, the upstream/downstream relationships of these water-related entities--and any associated information about them--can be analyzed using software tools ranging from spreadsheets to geographic information systems (GIS). GIS can also be used to combine NHD-based network analysis with other data layers, such as soils, land use and population, to help understand and display their respective effects upon one another. Furthermore, because the NHD provides a nationally consistent framework for addressing and analysis, water-related information linked to reach addresses by one organization (national, state, local) can be shared with other organizations and easily integrated into many different types of applications to the benefit of all.This high-resolution NHD, generally developed at 1:24,000/1:4,800 scale. Local resolution NHD is being developed where partners and data exist. The NHD contains reach codes for networked features, flow direction, names, and centerline representations for areal water bodies. The NHD also incorporates the National Spatial Data Infrastructure framework criteria established by the Federal Geographic Data Committee.This map contains a BETA version of WaterType attached to the Skagit River Basin NHDflowlines. This Beta version of the Watertype is the result of a pilot project and will be refined over the next six months. The field is for users of NHD who want access to Water Type and who are not under Forest Practices rules. The WaterType uses Shorelines Master Program type S streams and Fish Presence Data from both WA Dept Natural Resources and WA Dept Fish and Wildlife.
Facebook
TwitterPublic-facing Multipurpose Map Experience Builder App. Parcel data does not include landowner information. Includes all our core layers for zoning, critical areas, FEMA, shoreline master program and other features.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterThe Digital Bedrock Geologic-GIS Map of Minuteman National Historical Site and Vicinity, Massachusetts is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (mima_bedrock_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (mima_bedrock_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (mima_geology.gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (mima_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (mima_bedrock_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the mima_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: http://www.google.com/earth/index.html. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: Boston College and U.S. Geological Survey. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (mima_bedrock_geology_metadata.txt or mima_bedrock_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:24,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 25.4 meters or 83.3 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).