Facebook
TwitterThe Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve and Vicinity, Alaska and British Columbia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (glba_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (glba_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (glba_surficial_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (glba_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (glba_surficial_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (glba_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the glba_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: National Park Service. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (glba_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or glba_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).
Facebook
TwitterBackgroundGeophysical programs study the physical characteristics and properties of subsurface formations relating to oil and gas deposits, derived artificially by explosives or other means to map subsurface structure. Final plan spatial data is included for applications received between 1996 and 2004. Final plans identify the locations cleared at the conclusion of all operations.Data PropertiesAttributes / Column NameField AliasData TypeData PrecisionCommentsOBJECTIDObject IDSHAPEGeometryFILE_NUMFile NumberText10File number assigned to each application for tracking purposes within the Oil and Gas Commission. E.g., 9632012GEO_NUMGeophysical Program NumberText10Date the application is received and recorded into the database.APPL_RECDApplication Received DateDateThe number provided by the Regulator and assigned to the geophysical program. The name is included on the application permit and all operations and final plan documentation. E.g., 2001-105PROJ_NAMEGeophysical Program NameText50Program name provided by the operator. The name is included on the application permit and all operations and final plan documentation. E.g., Cheves Creek 3DPROG_TYPEGeophysical Program TypeText2Indicates if the geophysical was a 2D or 3D program.CLEARINGClearing TypeText5Indicates if the clearing was newly cut or already existed (NEW or EXIST).METHODOperation TypeText5Operation type indicates if a line is minimal impact, low impact or conventional (MIN, LOW, CONV).LINE_NAMEGeophysical Line NameText16Name of an individual line within the geophysical program provided by the operator. E.g., S-224LINE_TYPEGeophysical Line TypeText6Indicates whether geophysical lines are source, receiver or a combination of both (SOURCE, REC or COMBO).CUT_TYPEGeophysical Cut TypeText5Indicates whether a line already exists or is newly cut and the clearing method used. E.g., NCC (New Cat Cut)WIDTHGeophysical Line Width (m)DoubleWidth of the seismic line in meters.CLIENT_NAMClient NameText40Organization name of the oil and gas operator.LAND_TYPELand TypeText1Indicates whether the oil and gas application is on Private or Crown land (P or C).COMP_DATECompletion DateDateThe date construction for the entire program has been completed.CAPT_METHDCapture MethodText40Data capture method. E.g., scanningSRC_FILESource FileText10Format of the source data file. E.g., ANSIIRenewal Triggers and Service LevelsNeverDownstream ApplicationsWeb ApplicationMap ServiceREST SERVICEhttps://geoweb-ags.bc-er.ca/arcgis/rest/services/REFERENCE/GEO_FINAL_PLAN_1996_2004_LN/MapServer/0BC DATA CATALOGUEhttps://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/ogc-geophysical-final-plans-1996-2004)Contact Information:For further information please contactBC Energy Regulator servicedesk@bc-er.caAttention Geospatial Services Manager
Facebook
TwitterThe data release for the geologic and structure maps of the Kalispell 1 x 2 degrees quadrangle, Montana, and Alberta and British Columbia, is a Geologic Map Schema (GeMS)-compliant version that updates the GIS files for the geologic map published in U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-2267 (Harrison and others, 2000). The updated digital data present the attribute tables and geospatial features (lines and polygons) in the format that meets GeMS requirements. This data release presents the geologic map as shown on the plates and captured in geospatial data for the published map. Minor errors, such as mistakes in line decoration or differences between the digital data and the map image, are corrected in this version. The database represents the geology for the 16,436 square kilometer, geologically complex Kalispell 1 x 2 degrees Quadrangle, at a publication scale of 1:250,000. The map covers primarily Flathead and Lincoln Counties, but also includes minor parts of Glacier, Lake, and Sanders Counties. These GIS data supersede those in the interpretive report: Harrison, J.E., Cressman, E.R., Whipple, J.W., Kayser, H.Z., Derkey, P.D., and EROS Data Center, 2000, Geologic and structure maps of the Kalispell 1:250,000 quadrangle, Montana, and Alberta and British Columbia: a digital database: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-2267, version 1.0, 23 p., scale 1:250,000, https://pubs.usgs.gov/imap/i2267/.
Facebook
TwitterThis georectified digital map portrays Oregon, Washington, Idaho and British Columbia. Map date: 1863. The original paper map was scanned, georeferenced, and rectified to broaden access and to facilitate use in GIS software.Georeferenced source data: https://insideidaho.org/data/ago/uofi/library/historic-maps-spec/bancroftsMapOfORWAID.tif.zipNon-georeferenced source data: https://digital.lib.uidaho.edu/digital/collection/spec_hm/id/6/rec/1Original printed map is in Special Collections and Archives, University of Idaho Library, Moscow, ID 83844-2350; http://www.lib.uidaho.edu/special-collections/.
Facebook
TwitterWhat is NAIP? The National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) acquires aerial imagery during the agricultural growing seasons in the contiguous U.S. A primary goal of the NAIP program is to make digital ortho photography available to governmental agencies and the public within a year of acquisition. NAIP is administered by the USDA's Farm Production and Conservation Business Center Geospatial Enterprise Operations Branch (GEO). This "leaf-on" imagery is used as a base layer for GIS programs in FSA's County Service Centers, and is used to maintain the Common Land Unit (CLU) boundaries. How can I Access NAIP?On the web FPAC-BC-GEO public image services can be accessed through the REST endpoint here. Compressed County Mosaics (CCMs) are available to the general public through the USDA Geospatial Data Gateway. All years of available imagery may be downloaded as 1/2, 1, or 2 meter CCMs depending on the original spatial resolution. CCMs with a file size larger than 8 GB are not able to be downloaded from the Gateway. Full resolution 4 band quarter quads (DOQQs) are available for purchase from FPAC GEO. Contact the GEO Customer Service Section for information on pricing for DOQQs and how to obtain CCMs larger than 8 GB. A NAIP image service is also available on ArcGIS Online through an organizational subscription. How can NAIP be used? NAIP is used by many non-FSA public and private sector customers for a wide variety of projects. A detailed study is available in the Qualitative and Quantitative Synopsis on NAIP Usage from 2004 -2008: Click here for a list of NAIP Information and Distribution Nodes. When is NAIP acquired? NAIP projects are contracted each year based upon available funding and the FSA imagery acquisition cycle. Beginning in 2003, NAIP was acquired on a 5-year cycle. 2008 was a transition year, a three-year cycle began in 2009, NAIP was on a two-year cycle until 2016, currently NAIP is on a 3 year refresh cycle. Click here >> for an interactive PDF status map of NAIP acquisitions from 2002 - 2018. The 2022 acquisition status dashboard is available here. What are NAIP Specifications? NAIP imagery is currently acquired at 60cm ground sample distance (GSD) with a horizontal accuracy that matches within four meters of photo-identifiable ground control points. The default spectral resolution beginning in 2010 is four bands: Red, Green, Blue and Near Infrared. Contractually, every attempt will be made to comply with the specification of no more than 10% cloud cover per quarter quad tile, weather conditions permitting. All imagery is inspected for horizontal accuracy and tonal quality. Make Comments/Observations about current NAIP imagery.If you use NAIP imagery and have comments or find a problem with the imagery please use the NAIP Imagery Feedback Map to let us know what you find or how you are using NAIP imagery. Click here to access the map.
Facebook
TwitterPoints feature class representing all parkland in Baltimore County, including County-owned and County-leased land classified as parks, school recreation centers, green/open spaces, and other recreation sites. Contains attributes describing amenities located at each site.
Facebook
TwitterThe BC Land Based Investment (LBI) fish passage program is focused on remediating stream crossings that impede freshwater fish migration. The most common barrier to fish is improperly designed and installed closed bottom structures such as culverts. Remediation of these structures often involves replacing these barriers with properly designed embedded structures or open bottom structures such as bridges. The four phase delivery of the fish passage program involves fish passage assessments, habitat confirmation, design and construction to remediate the stream crossing.
Facebook
TwitterThe information in the abstract is translated from the archaeological report: The investigation at Landstorp (property Nyckelby 3:9) was made on the grounds that the area of the ancient monument RAÄ 246 needs to be considered for the planned rebuilding and new construction of National Road 32/50 between Motala and Mjölby. Directly adjacent to RAÄ 246, previous excavations found remains from the Neolithic to late historical times. In the previous investigations two grooves and a row of post holes were found, and interpreted as hut floors and two-aisled houses from the Neolithic. No more clear structures could be found among the other features. The results of the now completed field evaluation are very similar. Several pole-and stakes holes as well as pits, probably settlement related, were found. The most obvious remnants were two horseshoe-shaped grooves, one which was 14C-dated to 2460-2190 BC (2 sigma). Another dating pointed to the Neolithic (3700-3250 BC, 2 sigma). Similar sites with Neolithic grooves are known from the inland of Östergötland, but the number is few at present.
Purpose:
The information in the purpose is translated from the archeological report: On behalf of the Vägverket Southeast Region, following a decision by the County Administrative Board in Östergötland (reg. 4312415-09), Arkeologikonsult conducted a field evaluation survey at Landstorp in Västra Stenby parish prior to the construction of National Road 50 Motala-Mjölby.
The ZIP file consist of GIS files and an Access database with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.
Facebook
TwitterThe information in the abstract is translated from the archaeological report: The Swedish National Heritage Board's contract archaeology division, UV Öst, has performed a preliminary investigation during autumn 2005 and a subsequent final excavation during summer 2006 in Kimstad, within the property Ask 5:1, Norrköping municipality. The municipality was planning to build a new train station that would affect the prehistoric settlement site RAÄ 258. The excavations covered the remains of a neolithic house and a few other features. Two samples of charcoal have been dated to the Late Mesolithic, c. 4300 BC. A third sample was dated to the Early Neolithic, c. 3700 BC. About 3 kg of early neolithic pottery was collected. A polished axe of diabase supports this dating, which seems to bee the earliest phase of the settlement. The house was supported by one row of posts and included remains of hearths, pits and a larger storage pit.
Purpose:
The information in the purpose is translated from the archaeological report: The aim of the preliminary investigation was to delimit the archaeological site and to try to determine its character and dating. The aim of the final excavation was to determine the function and dating of the site and thus get a more definite understanding of the period of time the site has been used as well as its function. The aim was also to place the site in a larger perspective, comparing it to other settlement sites from the same era.
The ZIP file consist of GIS files and an Access database with information about the excavations, findings and other metadata about the archaeological survey.
Facebook
TwitterAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Complete stream network for the Salish Sea Bioregion. Stream, river, ditch, and canal line features were merged and harmonized using data from the BC Freshwater Atlas and the USGS National Hydrography Dataset. Lines were manually edited for obviously incorrect overlaps or gaps along the international border. The merged dataset was clipped to the Salish Sea Bioregion boundary as defined in the Salish Sea Atlas. Attributes were simplified and harmonized. All processing and analysis was completed using the NAD 83 UTM Zone 10N projection and coordinate system.Analysis and cartography by Aquila Flower. Washington stream lines from the USGS National Hydrography Dataset hosted by the Washington Department of Ecology (https://ecology.wa.gov/Research-Data/Data-resources/Geographic-Information-Systems-GIS/Data). British Columbia stream lines from the BC Freshwater Atlas hosted by the BC Data Catlogue (https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/data/geographic-data-services/topographic-data/freshwater).
Facebook
TwitterPurpose: Topographic mapping, resource inventory mapping, regional land use mapping.Notes: Index contours (indefinite-depression and combination) and intermediate contour (indefinite-depression and combination), areas of exclusion and Indefinite contours and cliffs. The TRIM program produces digital maps, which is a collection of coverages to conform with the BC Geographic System layout. TRIM mapping consists of 7,027 mapsheets covering the province of British Columbia at a scale of 1:20, 000.WMS GetCapabilities URL: DataBC also offers access to this data in OGC WMS format. WMS is useful when the map author does not require custom popups, styling, or analytic capabilities for the layer. ArcGIS Online authors may want to use WMS, instead of this ArcGIS Server layer, in the following scenarios: Where they want to use existing Data Custodian approved styling, and/or They only need simple identify and map rendering functionality.Copy the: WMS GetCapabilities URL to add this web item to an ArcGIS Online Map or Scene Viewer. In some cases, multiple Styles are listed in the GetCapabilities and can be added as WMS Custom parameters. For more information on how to use a WMS layer see - ESRI's OGC ArcGIS Online HelpBC Data Catalogue Metadata URL: https://catalogue.data.gov.bc.ca/dataset/8edde26d-aea0-47e9-bab1-e7c6226181ae
Facebook
TwitterThis map displays where National Pollutant Release Inventory sites are and in relation to Air Quality health Index monitoring stations that are buffered by a 2Km radius in British Columbia.
Facebook
TwitterThis hosted feature layer is provided by the USDA FPAC-BC-GEO and shows image acquisition dates for 2021 National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery for Minnesota. This date index is state based and contains a polygon for each exposure used in the creation of the imagery. Click on a polygon to find out more information about any area on the image. Attribute information includes the following: IDATE - Image acquisition date SDATE - Polygon start date/time - local 24 hour clock. The start/end time will be for the collection of the individual polygon (will be the same for frame based systems)EDATE - Polygon end date/time - local 24 hour clock. The start/end time will be for the collection of the individual polygon (will be the same for frame based systems)BCON - Color type - possible values are NC (natural color), CIR (color infrared), and M4B (4-band)CAM_TYPE - Camera type (Digital or film)CAM_MAN - Camera ManufacturerCAM_MOD - Camera modelHARD_FIRM - Camera HW and FW version which provides top level information specific to the camera systemSENSNUM - Sensor or lens serial numberAC_TYPE - Aircraft type - ICAO designation (i.e. C441 for a Cessna 441 Conquest II), airborne platforms only blank attribute for space-based systemsACTAILNUM - Aircraft tail number - airborne platforms only a blank attribute for space-based systemsSHAPE_AREA - Polygon area (square meters)RED_RNGE - Red electromagnetic spectrum - spectrum range in nano meters (604-664)GREEN_RNGE - Green electromagnetic spectrum - spectrum range in nano meters (533-587)BLUE_RNGE - Blue electromagnetic spectrum - spectrum range in nano meters (420-492)NIR_RNGE - Near infrared electromagnetic spectrum - spectrum range in nano meters (683-920)
Facebook
TwitterThis project was conducted by students of Vancouver Island University's Advanced Diploma in GIS Applications Online program (ADGISA), under the guidance of Robert Hudson (since deceased) of the Coast Forest Region Research Section (Province of BC).Note: it is unknown how the analysis was conducted and how complete the project was. Some watersheds and the data collected may be incorrect and subject to change.Original web mapping application:https://www.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=cbcac09d75bc4574baa0d277ea9d8896This is a view layer created from a map service hosted by VIU.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Facebook
TwitterThe Digital Surficial Geologic-GIS Map of Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve and Vicinity, Alaska and British Columbia is composed of GIS data layers and GIS tables, and is available in the following GRI-supported GIS data formats: 1.) a 10.1 file geodatabase (glba_surficial_geology.gdb), a 2.) Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) geopackage, and 3.) 2.2 KMZ/KML file for use in Google Earth, however, this format version of the map is limited in data layers presented and in access to GRI ancillary table information. The file geodatabase format is supported with a 1.) ArcGIS Pro map file (.mapx) file (glba_surficial_geology.mapx) and individual Pro layer (.lyrx) files (for each GIS data layer), as well as with a 2.) 10.1 ArcMap (.mxd) map document (glba_surficial_geology.mxd) and individual 10.1 layer (.lyr) files (for each GIS data layer). The OGC geopackage is supported with a QGIS project (.qgz) file. Upon request, the GIS data is also available in ESRI 10.1 shapefile format. Contact Stephanie O'Meara (see contact information below) to acquire the GIS data in these GIS data formats. In addition to the GIS data and supporting GIS files, three additional files comprise a GRI digital geologic-GIS dataset or map: 1.) this file (glba_geology_gis_readme.pdf), 2.) the GRI ancillary map information document (.pdf) file (glba_surficial_geology.pdf) which contains geologic unit descriptions, as well as other ancillary map information and graphics from the source map(s) used by the GRI in the production of the GRI digital geologic-GIS data for the park, and 3.) a user-friendly FAQ PDF version of the metadata (glba_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Please read the glba_geology_gis_readme.pdf for information pertaining to the proper extraction of the GIS data and other map files. Google Earth software is available for free at: https://www.google.com/earth/versions/. QGIS software is available for free at: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/. Users are encouraged to only use the Google Earth data for basic visualization, and to use the GIS data for any type of data analysis or investigation. The data were completed as a component of the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) program, a National Park Service (NPS) Inventory and Monitoring (I&M) Division funded program that is administered by the NPS Geologic Resources Division (GRD). For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: For a complete listing of GRI products visit the GRI publications webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/geologic-resources-inventory-products.htm. For more information about the Geologic Resources Inventory Program visit the GRI webpage: https://www.nps.gov/subjects/geology/gri,htm. At the bottom of that webpage is a "Contact Us" link if you need additional information. You may also directly contact the program coordinator, Jason Kenworthy (jason_kenworthy@nps.gov). Source geologic maps and data used to complete this GRI digital dataset were provided by the following: National Park Service. Detailed information concerning the sources used and their contribution the GRI product are listed in the Source Citation section(s) of this metadata record (glba_surficial_geology_metadata.txt or glba_surficial_geology_metadata_faq.pdf). Users of this data are cautioned about the locational accuracy of features within this dataset. Based on the source map scale of 1:100,000 and United States National Map Accuracy Standards features are within (horizontally) 50.8 meters or 166.7 feet of their actual location as presented by this dataset. Users of this data should thus not assume the location of features is exactly where they are portrayed in Google Earth, ArcGIS, QGIS or other software used to display this dataset. All GIS and ancillary tables were produced as per the NPS GRI Geology-GIS Geodatabase Data Model v. 2.3. (available at: https://www.nps.gov/articles/gri-geodatabase-model.htm).