This project serves as a focal point of capability and expertise for integrating remote sensing, satellite telemetry and GIS. Working collaboratively with other principal investigators, this project applies satellite and software technologies to study spatial and temporal interactions between wildlife populations and their environment. There are three primary objectives: 1) develop optimal structures for wildlife distribution databases with emphasis on satellite tracking data; 2) develop environmental thematic databases with emphasis on Arctic regions; and 3) develop GIS algorithms for integrated data analyses. Commensurate with accelerating advances in remote sensing, satellite telemetry, and geographic information system (GIS) technology, the primary objective of this task is to evaluate and apply these state-of-the-art tools for developing or improving the methodologies used in wildlife and ecosystem research. The need for cost-effective techniques to systematically acquire environmental data for remote or inaccessible areas, and locational data for highly mobile or migratory species, crosses bureau, program and issue boundaries. This is especially true in arctic regions, where numerous fish and wildlife populations often range internationally, across extensive landscapes of tundra, boreal forest, polar sea-ice, and aquatic ecosystems. Remote sensing technologies provide alternatives to traditional sampling methods, which are typically too expensive to implement across large spatial scales or severely compromised by hazardous weather conditions and extended winter darkness. Publications: Douglas, D.C., 2010, Arctic sea ice decline: Projected changes in timing and extent of sea ice in the Bering and Chukchi Seas: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2010-1176, 32 p. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, and N. G. Platonov (2005), Spatial and temporal variations in the age structure of Arctic sea ice, Geophys. Res. Lett.,32, L18504, doi:10.1029/2005GL023976 Belchanksy, G. I., D. C. Douglas, I. N. Mordvintsev, and N. G. Platonov (2004), Estimating the time of melt onset and freeze onset over Arctic sea-ice area using active and passive microwave data. Remote Sens. Environ., 92 , 21-39. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, and N. G. Platonov (2004), Duration of the Arctic sea ice melt season: Regional and interannual variability, 1979-2001, J. Climate, 17 , 67-80. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, I. V. Alpatsky, and N. G. Platonov (2004) , Spatial and temporal multiyear sea ice distributions in the Arctic : A neural network analysis of SSM/I data, 1988-2001, J. Geophys. Res. , 109 (C12), doi:10.1029/2004JC002388. Stone, R. S., D. C. Douglas, G. I. Belchansky, S. D. Drobot, and J. Harris (2005), Cause and effect of variations in western Arctic snow and sea ice cover. 8.3, Proc. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 8 th Conf. on Polar Oceanogr. and Meteorol. , San Diego , CA , 9-13 January. Belchansky, G. I., D. C. Douglas, V. A. Eremeev, and N. G. Platonov (2005), Variations in the Arctic's multiyear sea ice cover: A neural network analysis of SMMR-SSM/I data, 1979-2004. Geophys. Res. Lett. Vol. 32, No. 9, L09605, doi:10.1029/2005GL022395. Stone, R. S., D. C. Douglas, G. I. Belchansky, and S. D. Drobot (2005), Polar climate: Arctic sea ice, Pages 39-41 in D. H. Levinson (ed.), State of the Climate in 2004, Bull. Amer. Meterol. Soc., Vol. 86, No. 6, 86 pp. Stone, R. S., D. C. Douglas, G. I. Belchansky, and S. D. Drobot (2005), Correlated declines in western Arctic snow and sea ice cover. Arctic Res. United States, 19:18-25.

Note: This LCMS CONUS Cause of Change image service has been deprecated. It has been replaced by the LCMS CONUS Annual Change image service, which provides updated and consolidated change data.Please refer to the new service here: https://usfs.maps.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=085626ec50324e5e9ad6323c050ac84dThis product is part of the Landscape Change Monitoring System (LCMS) data suite. It shows LCMS change attribution classes for each year. See additional information about change in the Entity_and_Attribute_Information or Fields section below.LCMS is a remote sensing-based system for mapping and monitoring landscape change across the United States. Its objective is to develop a consistent approach using the latest technology and advancements in change detection to produce a "best available" map of landscape change. Because no algorithm performs best in all situations, LCMS uses an ensemble of models as predictors, which improves map accuracy across a range of ecosystems and change processes (Healey et al., 2018). The resulting suite of LCMS change, land cover, and land use maps offer a holistic depiction of landscape change across the United States over the past four decades.Predictor layers for the LCMS model include outputs from the LandTrendr and CCDC change detection algorithms and terrain information. These components are all accessed and processed using Google Earth Engine (Gorelick et al., 2017). To produce annual composites, the cFmask (Zhu and Woodcock, 2012), cloudScore, and TDOM (Chastain et al., 2019) cloud and cloud shadow masking methods are applied to Landsat Tier 1 and Sentinel 2a and 2b Level-1C top of atmosphere reflectance data. The annual medoid is then computed to summarize each year into a single composite. The composite time series is temporally segmented using LandTrendr (Kennedy et al., 2010; Kennedy et al., 2018; Cohen et al., 2018). All cloud and cloud shadow free values are also temporally segmented using the CCDC algorithm (Zhu and Woodcock, 2014). LandTrendr, CCDC and terrain predictors can be used as independent predictor variables in a Random Forest (Breiman, 2001) model. LandTrendr predictor variables include fitted values, pair-wise differences, segment duration, change magnitude, and slope. CCDC predictor variables include CCDC sine and cosine coefficients (first 3 harmonics), fitted values, and pairwise differences from the Julian Day of each pixel used in the annual composites and LandTrendr. Terrain predictor variables include elevation, slope, sine of aspect, cosine of aspect, and topographic position indices (Weiss, 2001) from the USGS 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) (U.S. Geological Survey, 2019). Reference data are collected using TimeSync, a web-based tool that helps analysts visualize and interpret the Landsat data record from 1984-present (Cohen et al., 2010).Outputs fall into three categories: change, land cover, and land use. Change relates specifically to vegetation cover and includes slow loss (not included for PRUSVI), fast loss (which also includes hydrologic changes such as inundation or desiccation), and gain. These values are predicted for each year of the time series and serve as the foundational products for LCMS. References: Breiman, L. (2001). Random Forests. In Machine Learning (Vol. 45, pp. 5-32). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010933404324Chastain, R., Housman, I., Goldstein, J., Finco, M., and Tenneson, K. (2019). Empirical cross sensor comparison of Sentinel-2A and 2B MSI, Landsat-8 OLI, and Landsat-7 ETM top of atmosphere spectral characteristics over the conterminous United States. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 221, pp. 274-285). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.012Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., and Kennedy, R. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 2. TimeSync - Tools for calibration and validation. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2911-2924). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.010Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Healey, S. P., Kennedy, R. E., and Gorelick, N. (2018). A LandTrendr multispectral ensemble for forest disturbance detection. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 205, pp. 131-140). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.11.015Foga, S., Scaramuzza, P.L., Guo, S., Zhu, Z., Dilley, R.D., Beckmann, T., Schmidt, G.L., Dwyer, J.L., Hughes, M.J., Laue, B. (2017). Cloud detection algorithm comparison and validation for operational Landsat data products. Remote Sensing of Environment, 194, 379-390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.026Gorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., and Moore, R. (2017). Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 202, pp. 18-27). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031Healey, S. P., Cohen, W. B., Yang, Z., Kenneth Brewer, C., Brooks, E. B., Gorelick, N., Hernandez, A. J., Huang, C., Joseph Hughes, M., Kennedy, R. E., Loveland, T. R., Moisen, G. G., Schroeder, T. A., Stehman, S. V., Vogelmann, J. E., Woodcock, C. E., Yang, L., and Zhu, Z. (2018). Mapping forest change using stacked generalization: An ensemble approach. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 204, pp. 717-728). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.09.029Kennedy, R. E., Yang, Z., and Cohen, W. B. (2010). Detecting trends in forest disturbance and recovery using yearly Landsat time series: 1. LandTrendr - Temporal segmentation algorithms. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 114, Issue 12, pp. 2897-2910). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.008Kennedy, R., Yang, Z., Gorelick, N., Braaten, J., Cavalcante, L., Cohen, W., and Healey, S. (2018). Implementation of the LandTrendr Algorithm on Google Earth Engine. In Remote Sensing (Vol. 10, Issue 5, p. 691). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10050691Olofsson, P., Foody, G. M., Herold, M., Stehman, S. V., Woodcock, C. E., and Wulder, M. A. (2014). Good practices for estimating area and assessing accuracy of land change. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 148, pp. 42-57). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.02.015Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M. and Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. In Journal of Machine Learning Research (Vol. 12, pp. 2825-2830).Pengra, B. W., Stehman, S. V., Horton, J. A., Dockter, D. J., Schroeder, T. A., Yang, Z., Cohen, W. B., Healey, S. P., and Loveland, T. R. (2020). Quality control and assessment of interpreter consistency of annual land cover reference data in an operational national monitoring program. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 238, p. 111261). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111261U.S. Geological Survey. (2019). USGS 3D Elevation Program Digital Elevation Model, accessed August 2022 at https://developers.google.com/earth-engine/datasets/catalog/USGS_3DEP_10mWeiss, A.D. (2001). Topographic position and landforms analysis Poster Presentation, ESRI Users Conference, San Diego, CAZhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2012). Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 118, pp. 83-94). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028Zhu, Z., and Woodcock, C. E. (2014). Continuous change detection and classification of land cover using all available Landsat data. In Remote Sensing of Environment (Vol. 144, pp. 152-171). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.011This record was taken from the USDA Enterprise Data Inventory that feeds into the https://data.gov catalog. Data for this record includes the following resources: ISO-19139 metadata ArcGIS Hub Dataset ArcGIS GeoService For complete information, please visit https://data.gov.

The Computer Vision in Geospatial Imagery market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing demand for accurate and efficient geospatial data analysis across various sectors. Advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning, and high-resolution imaging technologies are fueling this expansion. The market's ability to extract valuable insights from aerial and satellite imagery is transforming industries such as agriculture, urban planning, environmental monitoring, and defense. Applications range from precision agriculture using drone imagery for crop health monitoring to autonomous vehicle navigation and infrastructure inspection using high-resolution satellite data. The integration of computer vision with cloud computing platforms facilitates large-scale data processing and analysis, further accelerating market growth. We estimate the 2025 market size to be approximately $2.5 billion, exhibiting a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% from 2025 to 2033. This growth is expected to continue, driven by increasing adoption of advanced analytics and the need for real-time geospatial intelligence. Several factors contribute to this positive outlook. The decreasing cost of high-resolution sensors and cloud computing resources is making computer vision solutions more accessible. Furthermore, the growing availability of large datasets for training sophisticated AI models is enhancing the accuracy and performance of computer vision algorithms in analyzing geospatial data. However, challenges remain, including data privacy concerns, the need for robust data security measures, and the complexity of integrating diverse data sources. Nevertheless, the overall market trend remains strongly upward, with significant opportunities for technology providers and users alike. The key players listed—Alteryx, Google, Keyence, and others—are actively shaping this landscape through innovative product development and strategic partnerships.

The booming remote sensing software market is projected to reach $5 billion by 2025, growing at a CAGR of 8% until 2033. Driven by advancements in sensor technology and cloud computing, this market caters to various sectors, including environmental monitoring, urban planning, and defense. Learn about key market trends and leading players.

Discover the booming Satellite Remote Sensing Software market! This in-depth analysis reveals market size, CAGR, key drivers, trends, and restraints, including regional breakdowns and leading companies. Explore the opportunities in agriculture, water management, and more. Learn about the growing impact of AI and open-source solutions.

The Remote Sensing Interpretation Software market is booming, with a projected CAGR exceeding 10% through 2033. Driven by advancements in technology and increasing demand across agriculture, petroleum, and other sectors, this market offers lucrative opportunities. Explore key trends, regional insights, and leading companies shaping this dynamic industry.

This data set contains high-resolution QuickBird imagery and geospatial data for the entire Barrow QuickBird image area (156.15° W - 157.07° W, 71.15° N - 71.41° N) and Barrow B4 Quadrangle (156.29° W - 156.89° W, 71.25° N - 71.40° N), for use in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and remote sensing software. The original QuickBird data sets were acquired by DigitalGlobe from 1 to 2 August 2002, and consist of orthorectified satellite imagery. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC)-compliant metadata for all value-added data sets are provided in text, HTML, and XML formats.

Accessory layers include: 1:250,000- and 1:63,360-scale USGS Digital Raster Graphic (DRG) mosaic images (GeoTIFF format); 1:250,000- and 1:63,360-scale USGS quadrangle index maps (ESRI Shapefile format); an index map for the 62 QuickBird tiles (ESRI Shapefile format); and a simple polygon layer of the extent of the Barrow QuickBird image area and the Barrow B4 quadrangle area (ESRI Shapefile format).

Unmodified QuickBird data comprise 62 data tiles in Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 4 in GeoTIFF format. Standard release files describing the QuickBird data are included, along with the DigitalGlobe license agreement and product handbooks.

The baseline geospatial data support education, outreach, and multi-disciplinary research of environmental change in Barrow, which is an area of focused scientific interest. Data are provided on four DVDs. This product is available only to investigators funded specifically from the National Science Foundation (NSF), Office of Polar Programs (OPP), Arctic Sciences Section. An NSF OPP award number must be provided when ordering this data. Contact NSIDC User Services at nsidc@nsidc.org to order the data, and include an NSF OPP award number in the email.

Land cover maps are a critical component to make informed policy, development, planning, and resource management decisions. However, technical, capacity, and institutional challenges inhibit the creation of consistent and relevant land cover maps for use in developing regions. Many developing regions lack coordinated capacity, infrastructure, and technologies to produce a robust land cover monitoring system that meets land management needs. Local capacity may be replaced by external consultants or methods which lack long-term sustainability. In this study, we characterize and respond to the key land cover mapping gaps and challenges encountered in the Lower Mekong (LMR) and Hindu Kush-Himalaya (HKH) region through a needs assessment exercise and a collaborative system design. Needs were assessed using multiple approaches, including focus groups, user engagement workshops, and online surveys. Efforts to understand existing limitations and stakeholder needs resulted in a co-developed and modular land cover monitoring system which utilizes state-of-the-art cloud computing and machine learning which leverages freely available Earth observations. This approach meets the needs of diverse actors and is a model for transnational cooperation.

The global satellite remote sensing image market is booming, projected to reach $1740 million in 2025 and grow at a 13.9% CAGR through 2033. Discover key trends, drivers, and regional breakdowns in this comprehensive market analysis, including insights into high-resolution imagery, key players, and future growth potential.

Discover the booming remote sensing services market! This comprehensive analysis reveals a CAGR of 12.7% through 2033, driven by advancements in technology and increasing demand across various sectors. Learn about key players, market segmentation, and regional growth trends.

The satellite remote sensing market is booming, projected to reach $4911.2 million by 2025, with a 17.9% CAGR. Discover key drivers, trends, and leading companies shaping this dynamic sector, including Airbus, Boeing, and Planet Labs. Explore market size projections and regional breakdowns for informed strategic planning.

Discover the booming Satellite Remote Sensing Software market! Explore key trends, growth drivers, and regional market shares in our comprehensive analysis. Learn about leading companies and the future of this technology in agriculture, forestry, and beyond. Get the insights you need to make informed decisions.

This data support the paper "A systematic review on the integration of remote sensing and GIS to forest and grassland ecosystem health attributes, indicators, and measures " by Irini Soubry, Thuy Doan, Thuan Chu and Xulin Guo 2021 in the journal of "Remote Sensing" by MDPI. It includes the "Search_Effort.csv" list with the keywords and number of studies selected for further examination, the "Potential_Studies.csv" with the post-filtering of suitability and notes related to each study, the "Metadata.csv" with the information collected for each metadata variable per study, and the "ExtractedData.csv" with the information collected for each extracted dta variable per study. More information about the data collection and procedures can be found in the respective manuscript.

Discover the Remote Sensing Object Segmentation Dataset Perfect for GIS, AI driven environmental studies, and satellite image analysis.

This data was collected from Scopus database. Data is the part of a research article 'A bibliographic trend investigation of GIS research: the global landscape'. The data is useful for GIS and remote sensing domain researchers and practitioners.

The global geospatial data market is poised for significant expansion, projected to reach $3,788 million and grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.1% during the forecast period of 2025-2033. This robust growth is propelled by an increasing demand for location-based intelligence across diverse industries. Key drivers include the proliferation of IoT devices generating vast amounts of location data, advancements in satellite imagery and remote sensing technologies, and the growing adoption of AI and machine learning for analyzing complex geospatial datasets. The enterprise sector is emerging as a dominant application segment, leveraging geospatial data for enhanced decision-making in areas such as logistics, urban planning, real estate, and natural resource management. Furthermore, government agencies are increasingly utilizing this data for public safety, infrastructure development, and environmental monitoring. The market is characterized by a bifurcated segmentation between vector data, representing discrete geographic features, and raster data, depicting continuous phenomena like elevation or temperature. Both segments are experiencing healthy growth, driven by specialized applications and analytical needs. Emerging trends include the rise of real-time geospatial data streams, the increasing importance of high-resolution imagery, and the integration of AI-powered analytics to extract deeper insights. However, challenges such as data privacy concerns, high infrastructure costs for data acquisition and processing, and the need for skilled professionals to interpret and utilize the data effectively may pose some restraints. Despite these hurdles, the overwhelming benefits of actionable location intelligence are expected to drive sustained market expansion, with North America and Europe currently leading in adoption, followed closely by the rapidly growing Asia Pacific region. This in-depth report delves into the dynamic and rapidly evolving Geospatial Data Provider market, offering a comprehensive analysis from the historical period of 2019-2024 through to a robust forecast extending to 2033. With the Base Year and Estimated Year set at 2025, the report provides an up-to-the-minute snapshot and a forward-looking perspective on this critical industry. The market size, valued in the millions, is meticulously dissected across various segments, companies, and industry developments.

Supporting information for: REMAP: An online remote sensing application for land cover classification and monitoringcsv and json files for implementing land cover classifications using the remap, the remote ecosystem assessment and monitoring pipeline (https://remap-app.org/)Nearmap aerial photograph courtesy of Nearmap Pty Ltd.For further information see:Murray, N.J., Keith, D.A., Simpson, D., Wilshire, J.H., Lucas, R.M. (accepted) REMAP: A cloud-based remote sensing application for generalized ecosystem classifications. Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

The Geospatial Services market is booming, projected to reach $150 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 12% through 2033. Discover key market trends, drivers, and leading companies shaping this dynamic sector. Learn more about applications in agriculture, research, and more!

This product set contains reduced-resolution Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (IFSAR) imagery and geospatial data for the Barrow Peninsula (155.39 - 157.48 deg W, 70.86 - 71.47 deg N), for use in Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and remote sensing software. The primary IFSAR data sets were acquired by Intermap Technologies from 27 to 29 July 2002, and consist of an Orthorectified Radar Imagery (ORRI), a Digital Surface Model (DSM), and a Digital Terrain Model (DTM). Derived data layers include aspect, shaded relief, and slope-angle grids (floating-point binary format), as well as a vector layer of contour lines (ESRI Shapefile format). Also available are accessory layers compiled from other sources: 1:250,000- and 1:63,360-scale USGS Digital Raster Graphic (DRG) mosaic images (GeoTIFF format); 1:250,000- and 1:63,360-scale USGS quadrangle index maps (ESRI Shapefile format); and a simple polygon layer of the extent of the Barrow Peninsula (ESRI Shapefile format). The DSM and DTM data sets (20 m resolution) are provided in floating-point binary format with header and projection files. The ORRI mosaic (5 m resolution) is available in GeoTIFF format. FGDC-compliant metadata for all data sets are provided in text, HTML, and XML formats, along with the Intermap License Agreement and product handbook. The baseline geospatial data support education, outreach, and multi-disciplinary research of environmental change in Barrow, which is an area of focused scientific interest. Data are available via FTP and CD-ROM.