A listing of web services published from the authoritative East Baton Rouge Parish Geographic Information System (EBRGIS) data repository. Services are offered in Esri REST, and the Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) Web Mapping Service (WMS) or Web Feature Service (WFS) formats.

The Geographic Information System (GIS) Services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption across various sectors. While the provided data lacks specific market size figures, based on industry reports and observed trends in related technology sectors, we can estimate a 2025 market size of approximately $15 billion USD. This reflects the significant investments being made in spatial data infrastructure and the growing demand for location-based analytics. Assuming a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 8%, the market is projected to reach roughly $25 billion by 2033. Key drivers include the rising need for precise mapping and location intelligence in environmental management, urban planning, and resource optimization. Furthermore, advancements in cloud-based GIS platforms, the increasing availability of big data, and the development of sophisticated geospatial analytics tools are fueling market expansion. The market is segmented by service type (Analyze, Visualize, Manage, Others) and application (primarily Environmental Agencies, but also extending to various sectors such as utilities, transportation, and healthcare). North America currently holds a significant market share due to early adoption and advanced technological infrastructure. However, regions like Asia-Pacific are demonstrating rapid growth, driven by increasing urbanization and infrastructure development. While the lack of readily available detailed market figures presents a challenge for complete precision in projection, the overall trend points to a considerable expansion of the GIS services sector over the forecast period. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large multinational corporations like Infosys and Intellias and smaller, specialized firms like EnviroScience and R&K Solutions, reflecting the diverse needs of the market. These companies compete based on their technological capabilities, industry expertise, and geographical reach. The ongoing integration of GIS with other technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), will further shape the market landscape, creating opportunities for innovation and differentiation. Challenges include the high initial investment costs associated with implementing GIS solutions and the need for skilled professionals to effectively utilize these technologies. However, the long-term benefits of improved decision-making and operational efficiency are driving wider adoption despite these hurdles. The future growth of the GIS services market hinges on the continued development of innovative technologies and the increasing awareness of the value that location-based insights provide across various industries.

The booming GIS Services market, projected to reach $27.8 billion by 2033 with an 8% CAGR, is transforming industries. Learn about key trends, applications (environmental, utilities, infrastructure), and leading companies shaping this dynamic sector. Explore regional market shares and growth forecasts for North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific.

Discover the booming Geographic Information System (GIS) Services market! Explore its $15 Billion (2025 est.) size, 8% CAGR, key drivers, trends, and leading companies. Learn about regional market share and future growth projections in this in-depth analysis.

GIS Service request count data for MD iMAP GIS Services at https://geodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services

All of the ERS mapping applications, such as the Food Environment Atlas and the Food Access Research Atlas, use map services developed and hosted by ERS as the source for their map content. These map services are open and freely available for use outside of the ERS map applications. Developers can include ERS maps in applications through the use of the map service REST API, and desktop GIS users can use the maps by connecting to the map server directly.

Explore the booming Global Geographic Information System (GIS) Services market, projected to reach USD 60,243 million by 2033 with a 15.5% CAGR. Discover key drivers, applications, and regional growth trends in spatial analytics and mapping.

Environmental Sensitivity Index (ESI) data characterize the marine and coastal environments and wildlife based on sensitivity to spilled oil. Coastal species that are listed as threatened, endangered, or as a species of concern, by either federal or state governments, are a primary focus. A subset of the ESI data, the ESI Threatened and Endangered Species (T&E) databases focus strictly on these species. Species are mapped individually. In addition to showing spatial extent, each species polygon, point, or line has attributes describing abundance, seasonality, threatened/endangered status, and life history. Both the state and federal status is provided, along with the year the ESI data were published. This is important, as the status of a species can vary over time. As always, the ESI data are a snapshot in time. The biology layers focus on threatened/endangered status, areas of high concentration, and areas where sensitive life stages may occur. Supporting data tables provide species-/location-specific abundance, seasonality, status, life history, and source information. Human-use resources mapped include managed areas (parks, refuges, critical habitats, etc.) and resources that may be impacted by oiling and/or cleanup, such as beaches, archaeological sites, marinas, etc. ESIs are available for the majority of the US coastline, as well as the US territories. ESI data are available as PDF maps, as well as in a variety of GIS formats. For more information, go to http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi . To download complete ESI data sets, go to http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/esi_download .

The booming GIS Solutions market, projected to reach $15 billion in 2025 with a strong CAGR, is transforming industries with its location intelligence. Learn about key trends, drivers, restraints, and leading companies shaping this dynamic sector. Explore market segmentation by software, services, applications, and regions.

The Geographic Information System (GIS) Solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by increasing adoption across diverse sectors. The market, estimated at $15 billion in 2025, is projected to expand significantly over the forecast period (2025-2033), fueled by a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of approximately 8%. This growth is attributed to several key factors. Firstly, the rising need for precise spatial data analysis and visualization across industries like agriculture (precision farming), oil & gas (resource exploration and management), and construction (infrastructure planning and development) is driving demand. Secondly, advancements in GIS software and services, including cloud-based solutions and AI-powered analytics, are enhancing efficiency and accessibility. Thirdly, government initiatives promoting smart cities and infrastructure development are further boosting market expansion. The market is segmented by application (Agriculture, Oil & Gas, AEC, Transportation, Mining, Government, Healthcare, Others) and type (Software, Services), with software solutions currently holding a larger market share due to increasing digitization and data-driven decision-making. North America and Europe are currently the leading regional markets, benefiting from established infrastructure and high technology adoption rates, but Asia-Pacific is poised for significant growth driven by rapid urbanization and infrastructure development. Despite the promising growth trajectory, certain challenges remain. High initial investment costs for GIS software and implementation can be a barrier to entry for smaller businesses. Furthermore, the need for skilled professionals to effectively utilize and manage GIS data poses a considerable constraint. However, the ongoing development of user-friendly interfaces and accessible training programs is mitigating this issue. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players like ESRI, Hexagon, and Pitney Bowes, alongside emerging technology providers. These companies are actively investing in R&D and strategic partnerships to maintain their competitive edge and capitalize on the market's expansion. The long-term outlook for the GIS solutions market remains positive, with continuous innovation and expanding applications across various sectors paving the way for sustained growth throughout the forecast period.

The GIS Analytics market is booming, projected to reach $2979.7 million by 2025, with a 5.6% CAGR. Discover key drivers, trends, and restraints shaping this dynamic industry, including cloud adoption, location intelligence, and AI integration. Leading companies and regional market analysis are included.

Gallery of additional weather GIS services accessible through the NWS GeoHub. This gallery is best viewed in tandem with the NWS GeoHub:https://geospatial-nws-noaa.opendata.arcgis.com/

Utility GIS Data Quality Services Market Outlook

According to our latest research, the global Utility GIS Data Quality Services market size reached USD 1.29 billion in 2024, with a robust growth trajectory marked by a CAGR of 10.7% from 2025 to 2033. By the end of the forecast period, the market is projected to attain a value of USD 3.13 billion by 2033. This growth is primarily driven by the increasing need for accurate spatial data, the expansion of smart grid initiatives, and the rising complexity of utility network infrastructures worldwide.

The primary growth factor propelling the Utility GIS Data Quality Services market is the surging adoption of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for utility asset management and network optimization. Utilities are increasingly relying on GIS platforms to ensure seamless operations, improved decision-making, and regulatory compliance. However, the effectiveness of these platforms is directly linked to the quality and integrity of the underlying data. With the proliferation of IoT devices and the integration of real-time data sources, the risk of data inconsistencies and inaccuracies has risen, making robust data quality services indispensable. Utilities are investing heavily in data cleansing, validation, and enrichment to mitigate operational risks, reduce outages, and enhance customer satisfaction. This trend is expected to continue, as utilities recognize the strategic importance of data-driven operations in an increasingly digital landscape.

Another significant driver is the global movement towards smart grids and digital transformation across the utility sector. As utilities modernize their infrastructure, they are deploying advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and integrating distributed energy resources (DERs), which generate vast volumes of spatial and non-spatial data. Ensuring the accuracy, consistency, and completeness of this data is crucial for optimizing grid performance, minimizing losses, and enabling predictive maintenance. The need for real-time analytics and advanced network management further amplifies the demand for high-quality GIS data. Additionally, regulatory mandates for accurate reporting and asset traceability are compelling utilities to prioritize data quality initiatives. These factors collectively create a fertile environment for the growth of Utility GIS Data Quality Services, as utilities strive to achieve operational excellence and regulatory compliance.

Technological advancements and the rise of cloud-based GIS solutions are also fueling market expansion. Cloud deployment offers utilities the flexibility to scale data quality services, access advanced analytics, and collaborate across geographies. This has democratized access to sophisticated GIS data quality tools, particularly for mid-sized and smaller utilities that previously faced budgetary constraints. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in data quality solutions is enabling automated data cleansing, anomaly detection, and predictive analytics. These innovations are not only reducing manual intervention but also enhancing the accuracy and reliability of utility GIS data. As utilities continue to embrace digital transformation, the demand for cutting-edge data quality services is expected to surge, driving sustained market growth throughout the forecast period.

Utility GIS plays a pivotal role in supporting the digital transformation of the utility sector. By leveraging Geographic Information Systems, utilities can achieve a comprehensive understanding of their network infrastructures, enabling more efficient asset management and network optimization. The integration of Utility GIS with advanced data quality services ensures that utilities can maintain high standards of data accuracy and integrity, which are essential for effective decision-making and regulatory compliance. As utilities continue to modernize their operations and embrace digital technologies, the role of Utility GIS in facilitating seamless data integration and real-time analytics becomes increasingly critical. This not only enhances operational efficiency but also supports the strategic goals of sustainability and resilience in utility management.

Regionally, North America leads the Utility GIS Data Quality Services market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed closely by

Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations Ash Can dataset.

The Professional Map Services market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $1003.7 million in 2025. While the exact CAGR isn't provided, considering the rapid technological advancements in GIS, AI-powered mapping, and the increasing reliance on location-based services across various sectors, a conservative estimate of the CAGR for the forecast period (2025-2033) would be between 8% and 12%. This growth is fueled by several key drivers. The burgeoning adoption of smart city initiatives necessitates detailed and accurate mapping solutions. Furthermore, the increasing demand for precise navigation systems in the transportation and logistics industries, coupled with the rising popularity of location-based marketing and advertising, significantly contribute to market expansion. The integration of advanced technologies like AI and machine learning into mapping solutions is further enhancing accuracy, efficiency, and functionality, driving market growth. The market is segmented by service type (consulting and advisory, deployment and integration, support and maintenance) and application (utilities, construction, transportation, government, automotive, others), reflecting the diverse needs of various industries. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of established players like Esri, Google, TomTom, and Mapbox, alongside emerging innovative companies. Geographic expansion, particularly in developing economies with rapidly urbanizing populations, presents a significant opportunity for growth. However, challenges such as data security concerns and the high cost of advanced mapping technologies could act as potential restraints. The market's future growth hinges on continuous technological advancements and the expansion of data accessibility. The increasing adoption of cloud-based mapping solutions is streamlining data management and improving collaboration. Furthermore, the growing integration of map data into various applications, such as autonomous vehicles and augmented reality experiences, is creating new market avenues. Regulatory changes and data privacy regulations will play a crucial role in shaping the market landscape in the coming years. The diverse application segments ensure market resilience, as growth in one sector can offset potential slowdowns in another. The ongoing expansion into new geographical territories, particularly in Asia-Pacific and other developing regions, presents substantial growth opportunities for market participants.

Seattle Parks and Recreation ARCGIS park feature map layer web services are hosted on Seattle Public Utilities' ARCGIS server. This web services URL provides a live read only data connection to the Seattle Parks and Recreations Gardens dataset.

The construction of this data model was adapted from the Telvent Miner & Miner ArcFM MultiSpeak data model to provide interface functionality with Milsoft Utility Solutions WindMil engineering analysis program. Database adaptations, GPS data collection, and all subsequent GIS processes were performed by Southern Geospatial Services for the Town of Apex Electric Utilities Division in accordance to the agreement set forth in the document "Town of Apex Electric Utilities GIS/GPS Project Proposal" dated March 10, 2008. Southern Geospatial Services disclaims all warranties with respect to data contained herein. Questions regarding data quality and accuracy should be directed to persons knowledgeable with the forementioned agreement.The data in this GIS with creation dates between March of 2008 and April of 2024 were generated by Southern Geospatial Services, PLLC (SGS). The original inventory was performed under the above detailed agreement with the Town of Apex (TOA). Following the original inventory, SGS performed maintenance projects to incorporate infrastructure expansion and modification into the GIS via annual service agreements with TOA. These maintenances continued through April of 2024.At the request of TOA, TOA initiated in house maintenance of the GIS following delivery of the final SGS maintenance project in April of 2024. GIS data created or modified after April of 2024 are not the product of SGS.With respect to SGS generated GIS data that are point features:GPS data collected after January 1, 2013 were surveyed using mapping grade or survey grade GPS equipment with real time differential correction undertaken via the NC Geodetic Surveys Real Time Network (VRS). GPS data collected prior to January 1, 2013 were surveyed using mapping grade GPS equipment without the use of VRS, with differential correction performed via post processing.With respect to SGS generated GIS data that are line features:Line data in the GIS for overhead conductors were digitized as straight lines between surveyed poles. Line data in the GIS for underground conductors were digitized between surveyed at grade electric utility equipment. The configurations and positions of the underground conductors are based on TOA provided plans. The underground conductors are diagrammatic and cannot be relied upon for the determination of the actual physical locations of underground conductors in the field.The Service Locations feature class was created by Southern Geospatial Services (SGS) from a shapefile of customer service locations generated by dataVoice International (DV) as part of their agreement with the Town of Apex (TOA) regarding the development and implemention of an Outage Management System (OMS).Point features in this feature class represent service locations (consumers of TOA electric services) by uniquely identifying the features with the same unique identifier as generated for a given service location in the TOA Customer Information System (CIS). This is also the mechanism by which the features are tied to the OMS. Features are physically located in the GIS based on CIS address in comparison to address information found in Wake County GIS property data (parcel data). Features are tied to the GIS electric connectivity model by identifying the parent feature (Upline Element) as the transformer that feeds a given service location.SGS was provided a shapefile of 17992 features from DV. Error potentially exists in this DV generated data for the service location features in terms of their assigned physical location, phase, and parent element.Regarding the physical location of the features, SGS had no part in physically locating the 17992 features as provided by DV and cannot ascertain the accuracy of the locations of the features without undertaking an analysis designed to verify or correct for error if it exists. SGS constructed the feature class and loaded the shapefile objects into the feature class and thus the features exist in the DV derived location. SGS understands that DV situated the features based on the address as found in the CIS. No features were verified as to the accuracy of their physical location when the data were originally loaded. It is the assumption of SGS that the locations of the vast majority of the service location features as provided by DV are in fact correct.SGS understands that as a general rule that DV situated residential features (individually or grouped) in the center of a parcel. SGS understands that for areas where multiple features may exist in a given parcel (such as commercial properties and mobile home parks) that DV situated features as either grouped in the center of the parcel or situated over buildings, structures, or other features identifiable in air photos. It appears that some features are also grouped in roads or other non addressed locations, likely near areas where they should physically be located, but that these features were not located in a final manner and are either grouped or strung out in a row in the general area of where DV may have expected they should exist.Regarding the parent and phase of the features, the potential for error is due to the "first order approximation" protocol employed by DV for assigning the attributes. With the features located as detailed above, SGS understands that DV identified the transformer closest to the service location (straight line distance) as its parent. Phase was assigned to the service location feature based on the phase of the parent transformer. SGS expects that this protocol correctly assigned parent (and phase) to a significant portion of the features, however this protocol will also obviously incorretly assign parent in many instances.To accurately identify parent for all 17992 service locations would require a significant GIS and field based project. SGS is willing to undertake a project of this magnitude at the discretion of TOA. In the meantime, SGS is maintaining (editing and adding to) this feature class as part of the ongoing GIS maintenance agreement that is in place between TOA and SGS. In lieu of a project designed to quality assess and correct for the data provided by DV, SGS will verify the locations of the features at the request of TOA via comparison of the unique identifier for a service location to the CIS address and Wake County parcel data address as issues arise with the OMS if SGS is directed to focus on select areas for verification by TOA. Additionally, as SGS adds features to this feature class, if error related to the phase and parent of an adjacent feature is uncovered during a maintenance, it will be corrected for as part of that maintenance.With respect to the additon of features moving forward, TOA will provide SGS with an export of CIS records for each SGS maintenance, SGS will tie new accounts to a physical location based on address, SGS will create a feature for the CIS account record in this feature class at the center of a parcel for a residential address or at the center of a parcel or over the correct (or approximately correct) location as determined via air photos or via TOA plans for commercial or other relevant areas, SGS will identify the parent of the service location as the actual transformer that feeds the service location, and SGS will identify the phase of the service address as the phase of it's parent.Service locations with an ObjectID of 1 through 17992 were originally physically located and attributed by DV.Service locations with an ObjectID of 17993 or higher were originally physically located and attributed by SGS.DV originated data are provided the Creation User attribute of DV, however if SGS has edited or verified any aspect of the feature, this attribute will be changed to SGS and a comment related to the edits will be provided in the SGS Edits Comments data field. SGS originated features will be provided the Creation User attribute of SGS. Reference the SGS Edits Comments attribute field Metadata for further information.

Senior Service Network Service Locations. The dataset contains locations and attributes of select Office of Aging listed services, created as part of the DC Geographic Information System (DC GIS) for the D.C. Office of the Chief Technology Officer (OCTO) and participating D.C. government agencies. The DC Department of Aging and Community Living (DACL) website and Senior Service Directory identified aging service locations and DC GIS staff geo-processed the data. Services include adult day care, adult education, advocacy, case management, group housing, job training, group meals, health care support, legal assistance, recreation, transportation, and wellness.

Financial overview and grant giving statistics of Community Gis Services Inc.

Discover the booming GIS software market! Explore its $15 billion valuation, 12% CAGR growth, key drivers, trends, and leading players like Esri & Google. This in-depth analysis reveals regional market share and future projections through 2033.