The United States contributed roughly 17 percent of global warming from 1851 to 2023. By contrast, India contributed five percent of warming during this period, despite the country having a far larger population than the United States. In total, G20 countries have contributed approximately three-quarters of global warming to date, while the least developed countries are responsible for just six percent.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This work combines global warming data from various publications and datasets, creating a new dataset covering a very long period - from the year 1 to 2100.
The dataset created in this work separates the actual records for the 1-2024 period from the forecast for the 2020-2100 period.
The work includes separate sets for land+ocean (GW), land only (GWL), and ocean only (GWO).
The online dataset is available on the site nowagreen.com.
According to an April 2024 survey on climate change conducted in the United States, some ** percent of the respondents claimed they believed that global warming was happening. A much smaller share, ** percent, believed global warming was not happening.
This dataset contains modeled temperature, ozone, and PM2.5 data for the United States over the 21st century, using two global climate model scenarios and two emissions datasets.
No further editions of this report will be published as it has been replaced by the Agri-climate report 2021.
This annual publication brings together existing statistics on English agriculture in order to help inform the understanding of agriculture and greenhouse gas emissions. The publication summarises available statistics that relate directly and indirectly to emissions and includes statistics on farmer attitudes to climate change mitigation and uptake of mitigation measures. It also incorporates statistics emerging from developing research and provides some international comparisons. It is updated when sufficient new information is available.
Next update: see the statistics release calendar
For further information please contact:
Agri.EnvironmentStatistics@defra.gov.uk
https://www.twitter.com/@defrastats" class="govuk-link">Twitter: @DefraStats
According to an April 2024 survey on climate change conducted in the United States, some ** percent of respondents thought that global warming is affecting the weather a lot. Only eight percent of respondents claimed that global warming was affecting the weather just a little.
Compilation of Earth Surface temperatures historical. Source: https://www.kaggle.com/berkeleyearth/climate-change-earth-surface-temperature-data
Data compiled by the Berkeley Earth project, which is affiliated with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study combines 1.6 billion temperature reports from 16 pre-existing archives. It is nicely packaged and allows for slicing into interesting subsets (for example by country). They publish the source data and the code for the transformations they applied. They also use methods that allow weather observations from shorter time series to be included, meaning fewer observations need to be thrown away.
In this dataset, we have include several files:
Global Land and Ocean-and-Land Temperatures (GlobalTemperatures.csv):
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
**Other files include: **
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
%3C!-- --%3E
The raw data comes from the Berkeley Earth data page.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
A complete description of the dataset is given by Jones et al. (2023). Key information is provided below.
Background
A dataset describing the global warming response to national emissions CO2, CH4 and N2O from fossil and land use sources during 1851-2021.
National CO2 emissions data are collated from the Global Carbon Project (Andrew and Peters, 2024; Friedlingstein et al., 2024).
National CH4 and N2O emissions data are collated from PRIMAP-hist (HISTTP) (Gütschow et al., 2024).
We construct a time series of cumulative CO2-equivalent emissions for each country, gas, and emissions source (fossil or land use). Emissions of CH4 and N2O emissions are related to cumulative CO2-equivalent emissions using the Global Warming Potential (GWP*) approach, with best-estimates of the coefficients taken from the IPCC AR6 (Forster et al., 2021).
Warming in response to cumulative CO2-equivalent emissions is estimated using the transient climate response to cumulative carbon emissions (TCRE) approach, with best-estimate value of TCRE taken from the IPCC AR6 (Forster et al., 2021, Canadell et al., 2021). 'Warming' is specifically the change in global mean surface temperature (GMST).
The data files provide emissions, cumulative emissions and the GMST response by country, gas (CO2, CH4, N2O or 3-GHG total) and source (fossil emissions, land use emissions or the total).
Data records: overview
The data records include three comma separated values (.csv) files as described below.
All files are in ‘long’ format with one value provided in the Data column for each combination of the categorical variables Year, Country Name, Country ISO3 code, Gas, and Component columns.
Component specifies fossil emissions, LULUCF emissions or total emissions of the gas.
Gas specifies CO2, CH4, N2O or the three-gas total (labelled 3-GHG).
Country ISO3 codes are specifically the unique ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 codes of each country.
Data records: specifics
Data are provided relative to 2 reference years (denoted ref_year below): 1850 and 1991. 1850 is a mutual first year of data spanning all input datasets. 1991 is relevant because the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change was operationalised in 1992.
EMISSIONS_ANNUAL_{ref_year-20}-2023.csv: Data includes annual emissions of CO2 (Pg CO2 year-1), CH4 (Tg CH4 year-1) and N2O (Tg N2O year-1) during the period ref_year-20 to 2023. The Data column provides values for every combination of the categorical variables. Data are provided from ref_year-20 because these data are required to calculate GWP* for CH4.
EMISSIONS_CUMULATIVE_CO2e100_{ref_year+1}-2023.csv: Data includes the cumulative CO2 equivalent emissions in units Pg CO2-e100 during the period ref_year+1 to 2023 (i.e. since the reference year). The Data column provides values for every combination of the categorical variables.
GMST_response_{ref_year+1}-2023.csv: Data includes the change in global mean surface temperature (GMST) due to emissions of the three gases in units °C during the period ref_year+1 to 2023 (i.e. since the reference year). The Data column provides values for every combination of the categorical variables.
Accompanying Code
Code is available at: https://github.com/jonesmattw/National_Warming_Contributions .
The code requires Input.zip to run (see README at the GitHub link).
Further info: Country Groupings
We also provide estimates of the contributions of various country groupings as defined by the UNFCCC:
And other country groupings:
See COUNTRY_GROUPINGS.xlsx for the lists of countries in each group.
This folder, titled "Data," contains the MATLAB code, final products, tables, and figures used in Parker, L.E., Zhang, N., Abatzoglou, J.T. et al. A variety-specific analysis of climate change effects on California winegrapes. Int J Biometeorol 68, 1559–1571 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-024-02684-8 Data Collection: Climatological data (daily maximum and minimum temperatures, precipitation, and reference evapotranspiration) were obtained from the gridMET dataset for the contemporary period (1991-2020) and from 20 global climate models (GCMs) for the mid-21st century (2040-2069) under RCP 4.5.Phenology Modeling: Variety-specific phenology models were developed using published climatic thresholds to assess chill accumulation, budburst, flowering, veraison, and maturity stages for the six winegrape varieties.Agroclimatic Metrics: Fourteen viticulturally important agroclimatic metrics were calculated, including Growing Degree Days (GDD), Cold Hardiness, Chilling Degree Days (CDD), Frost Damage Days (FDD), and others.Analysis Tools: MATLAB was used for data processing, analysis, and visualization. The MATLAB code provided in this dataset includes scripts for analyzing climate data, running phenology models, and generating visualizations.MATLAB Code: Scripts and functions used for data analysis and modeling.Processed Data: Results from phenology and agroclimatic analyses, including the projected changes in phenological stages and climate metrics for the selected varieties and AVAs.Tables: Detailed results of phenological changes and climate metrics, presented in a clear and structured format.Figures: Visual representations of the data and results, including charts and maps illustrating the impacts of climate change on winegrape development stages and agroclimatic conditions. Research Description: This study investigates the impacts of climate change on the phenology and agroclimatic metrics of six winegrape varieties (Cabernet Sauvignon, Chardonnay, Pinot Noir, Zinfandel, Pinot Gris, Sauvignon Blanc) across multiple California American Viticultural Areas (AVAs). Using climatological data and phenology models, the research quantifies changes in key development stages and viticulturally important climate metrics for the mid-21st century.
Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
License information was derived automatically
Data description
The FAOSTAT Temperature Change domain disseminates statistics of mean surface temperature change by country, with annual updates. The current dissemination covers the period 1961–2023. Statistics are available for monthly, seasonal and annual mean temperature anomalies, i.e., temperature change with respect to a baseline climatology, corresponding to the period 1951–1980. The standard deviation of the temperature change of the baseline methodology is also available. Data are based on the publicly available GISTEMP data, the Global Surface Temperature Change data distributed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Institute for Space Studies (NASA-GISS).
Statistical concepts and definitions
Statistical standards: Data in the Temperature Change domain are not an explicit SEEA variable. Nonetheless, country and regional calculations employ a definition of “Land area” consistent with SEEA Land Use definitions, specifically SEEA CF Table 5.11 “Land Use Classification” and SEEA AFF Table 4.8, “Physical asset account for land use.” The Temperature Change domain of the FAOSTAT Agri-Environmental Indicators section is compliant with the Framework for the Development of Environmental Statistics (FDES 2013), contributing to FDES Component 1: Environmental Conditions and Quality, Sub-component 1.1: Physical Conditions, Topic 1.1.1: Atmosphere, climate and weather, Core set/ Tier 1 statistics a.1.
Statistical unit: Countries and Territories.
Statistical population: Countries and Territories.
Reference area: Area of all the Countries and Territories of the world. In 2019: 190 countries and 37 other territorial entities.
Code - reference area: FAOSTAT, M49, ISO2 and ISO3 (http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#definitions). FAO Global Administrative Unit Layer (GAUL National level – reference year 2014. FAO Geospatial data repository GeoNetwork. Permanent address: http://www.fao.org:80/geonetwork?uuid=f7e7adb0-88fd-11da-a88f-000d939bc5d8.
Code - Number of countries/areas covered: In 2019: 190 countries and 37 other territorial entities.
Time coverage: 1961-2023
Periodicity: Monthly, Seasonal, Yearly
Base period: 1951-1980
Unit of Measure: Celsius degrees °C
Reference period: Months, Seasons, Meteorological year
Documentation on methodology: Details on the methodology can be accessed at the Related Documents section of the Temperature Change (ET) domain in the Agri-Environmental Indicators section of FAOSTAT.
Quality documentation: For more information on the methods, coverage, accuracy and limitations of the Temperature Change dataset please refer to the NASA GISTEMP website: https://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/
Source: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/ET/metadata
Climate change is one of the important issues that face the world in this technological era. The best proof of this situation is the historical temperature change. You can investigate if any hope there is for stopping global warming :)
Can you find any correlation between temperature change and any other variable? (Using ISO3 codes for merging any other countries' data sets possible.)
Prediction of temperature change: there is also an overall world temperature change in the country list as 'World'.
This dataset includes processed climate change datasets related to climatology, hydrology, and water operations. The climatological data provided are change factors for precipitation and reference evapotranspiration gridded over the entire State. The hydrological data provided are projected stream inflows for major streams in the Central Valley, and streamflow change factors for areas outside of the Central Valley and smaller ungaged watersheds within the Central Valley. The water operations data provided are Central Valley reservoir outflows, diversions, and State Water Project (SWP) and Central Valley Project (CVP) water deliveries and select streamflow data. Most of the Central Valley inflows and all of the water operations data were simulated using the CalSim II model and produced for all projections.
These data were originally developed for the California Water Commission’s Water Storage Investment Program (WSIP). The WSIP data used as the basis for these climate change resources along with the technical reference document are located here: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/climate-change-projections-wsip-2030-2070. Additional processing steps were performed to improve user experience, ease of use for GSP development, and for Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA) implementation. Furthermore, the data, tools, and guidance may be useful for purposes other than sustainable groundwater management under SGMA.
Data are provided for projected climate conditions centered around 2030 and 2070. The climate projections are provided for these two future climate periods, and include one scenario for 2030 and three scenarios for 2070: a 2030 central tendency, a 2070 central tendency, and two 2070 extreme scenarios (i.e., one drier with extreme warming and one wetter with moderate warming). The climate scenario development process represents a climate period analysis where historical interannual variability from January 1915 through December 2011 is preserved while the magnitude of events may be increased or decreased based on projected changes in precipitation and air temperature from general circulation models.
DWR has collaborated with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to improve the quality of the 2070 extreme scenarios. The 2070 extreme scenario update utilizes an improved climate period analysis method known as "quantile delta mapping" to better capture the GCM-projected change in temperature and precipitation. A technical note on the background and results of this process is provided here: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/extreme-climate-change-scenarios-for-water-supply-planning/resource/f2e1c61a-4946-4863-825f-e6d516b433ed.
Note: the original version of the 2070 extreme scenarios can be accessed in the archive posted here: https://data.cnra.ca.gov/dataset/sgma-climate-change-resources/resource/51b6ee27-4f78-4226-8429-86c3a85046f4
As part of this national strategy, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) had launched a 5-year (FY2007 - 2011) initiative called the Innovative Program of Climate Change Projection for the 21st Century (KAKUSHIN Program), using the Earth Simulator (ES) to address emerging research challenges, such as those derived from the outcomes of the MEXT's Kyosei Project (FY2002 - 2006), that had made substantial contributions to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The KAKUSHIN Program was expected to further contribute to the Fifth Assessment Report (AR5).
The research items include the advancement and forecasting of global warming models, the quantification and reduction of model uncertainty, and the evaluation of the impacts of natural disasters based on forecast information. Much of the data submitted to CMIP5 from Japan were generated under this KAKUSHIN program using the global climate models and the Earth system models developed in Japan. This dataset is the result of using the Global Climate Model MIROC4h.
All CMIP5 data are collected, managed, and published by the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF), and DIAS serves as an ESGF node. All public datasets, including this dataset, are available from ESGF. For information on how to use these datasets, including this dataset, see "CMIP5 Data - Getting Started" (URL is available in the online information below). Please note that an ESGF account is required to download the CMIP5 data.
Because the terms of use for CMIP5 data are different from CMIP6 in many respects, please check the following Terms of Use carefully: https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/mips/cmip5/terms-of-use.html Currently, all CMIP5 data, including this dataset, is classified as "unrestricted" within it.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
This repository contains data used in figures in Samset et al. 2024, Communications Earth & Environmenthttps://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-024-01637-8https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-024-01637-8Obs_GMST_GreensFunctionFiltered.zip:Global mean surface temperature data series for four observational reconstructions.Key fields:- tas_aa: Global mean surface temperature anomaly, relative to 1850-1899 or 1880-1899, depending on the coverage.- tas_fbr_aa: As tas_aa, but with SST pattern filering applied, as documented in the publicationSimilarly formatted CMIP6 data are available in a separate archive:Underlying data for "Steady global surface warming from 1973 to 2022 but increased warming rate after 1990" (10.1038/s43247-023-01061-4)
(1) This is the dataset simulated by high resolution atmospheric model of which horizontal resolution is 60km-mesh over the globe (GCM), and 20km over Japan and surroundings (RCM), respetively. The climate of the latter half of the 20th century is simulated for 6000 years (3000 years for the Japan area), and the climates 1.5 K (*2), 2 K (*1) and 4 K warmer than the pre-industrial climate are simulated for 1566, 3240 and 5400 years, respectivley, to see the effect of global warming. (2) Huge number of ensembles enable not only with statistics but also with high accuracy to estimate the future change of extreme events such as typoons and localized torrential downpours. In addtion, this dataset provides the highly reliable information on the impact of natural disasters due to climate change on future societies. (3) This dataset provides the climate projections which adaptations against global warming are based on in various fields, for example, disaster prevention, urban planning, environmetal protection, and so on. It would realize the global warming adaptations consistent not only among issues but also among regions. (4) Total size of this dataset is 3 PB (3 x the 15th power of 10 bytes).
(*1) Datasets of the climates 2K warmer than the pre-industorial climate is available on 10th August, 2018. (*2) Datasets of the climates 1.5K warmer than the pre-industorial climate is available on 8th February, 2022.
This data-set was collected to replicate the findings of Schuldt et al. (2011). It contains data from the UK, USA, and Australia collected between 2nd of January 2018 and the 29th of April 2019. It measures individuals political party, and belief in environmental phenomena.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Annual averages of global surface temperature changes for land only based on Berkeley Earth monthly dataset above the 1951-1980 baseline. The dataset is from 1750 in °C, 3 decimal places.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
If you use the dataset, cite the paper: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117541
The most comprehensive dataset to date regarding climate change and human opinions via Twitter. It has the heftiest temporal coverage, spanning over 13 years, includes over 15 million tweets spatially distributed across the world, and provides the geolocation of most tweets. Seven dimensions of information are tied to each tweet, namely geolocation, user gender, climate change stance and sentiment, aggressiveness, deviations from historic temperature, and topic modeling, while accompanied by environmental disaster events information. These dimensions were produced by testing and evaluating a plethora of state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms and methods, both supervised and unsupervised, including BERT, RNN, LSTM, CNN, SVM, Naive Bayes, VADER, Textblob, Flair, and LDA.
The following columns are in the dataset:
➡ created_at: The timestamp of the tweet. ➡ id: The unique id of the tweet. ➡ lng: The longitude the tweet was written. ➡ lat: The latitude the tweet was written. ➡ topic: Categorization of the tweet in one of ten topics namely, seriousness of gas emissions, importance of human intervention, global stance, significance of pollution awareness events, weather extremes, impact of resource overconsumption, Donald Trump versus science, ideological positions on global warming, politics, and undefined. ➡ sentiment: A score on a continuous scale. This scale ranges from -1 to 1 with values closer to 1 being translated to positive sentiment, values closer to -1 representing a negative sentiment while values close to 0 depicting no sentiment or being neutral. ➡ stance: That is if the tweet supports the belief of man-made climate change (believer), if the tweet does not believe in man-made climate change (denier), and if the tweet neither supports nor refuses the belief of man-made climate change (neutral). ➡ gender: Whether the user that made the tweet is male, female, or undefined. ➡ temperature_avg: The temperature deviation in Celsius and relative to the January 1951-December 1980 average at the time and place the tweet was written. ➡ aggressiveness: That is if the tweet contains aggressive language or not.
Since Twitter forbids making public the text of the tweets, in order to retrieve it you need to do a process called hydrating. Tools such as Twarc or Hydrator can be used to hydrate tweets.
The majority of U.S. adults believe that non-government scientists and educators are the most trustworthy sources for information about climate change, with **** percent of respondents in 2022. By comparison, nearly ** percent of respondents said they considered environmental groups trustworthy, and some ** percent said they considered college professors/educators trustworthy.
By Andy Kriebel [source]
This dataset contains global temperature anomalies. The data represents deviations from the corresponding means.The data was collected by the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies and provides a snapshot of our changing climate
- To study the effect of global warming on different parts of the world.
- To study the effect of global warming on different seasons.
- To study the effect of global warming on different years
License
License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.
File: Global Temperature Anomalies.csv | Column name | Description | |:---------------|:-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Hemisphere | The hemisphere the data is from. (String) | | Year | The year the data is from. (Integer) | | Jan | The temperature anomaly in January. (Float) | | Feb | The temperature anomaly in February. (Float) | | Mar | The temperature anomaly in March. (Float) | | Apr | The temperature anomaly in April. (Float) | | May | The temperature anomaly in May. (Float) | | Jun | The temperature anomaly in June. (Float) | | Jul | The temperature anomaly in July. (Float) | | Aug | The temperature anomaly in August. (Float) | | Sep | The temperature anomaly in September. (Float) | | Oct | The temperature anomaly in October. (Float) | | Nov | The temperature anomaly in November. (Float) | | Dec | The temperature anomaly in December. (Float) | | J-D | The temperature anomaly for the months of January, February and March. (Float) | | D-N | The temperature anomaly for the months of April, May and June. (Float) | | DJF | The temperature anomaly for the months of December, January and February. (Float) | | MAM | The temperature anomaly for the months of March, April and May. (Float) | | JJA | The temperature anomaly for the months of June, July and August. (Float) | | SON | The temperature anomaly for the months of September, October and November. (Float) |
If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Andy Kriebel.
U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is the largest global dataset to date of soil respiration, moisture, and temperature measurements, totaling >3800 observations representing 27 temperature manipulation studies, spanning nine biomes and nearly two decades of warming experiments. Data for this study were obtained from a combination of unpublished data and published literature values. We find that although warming increases soil respiration rates, there is limited evidence for a shifting respiration response with experimental warming. We also note a universal decline in the temperature sensitivity of respiration at soil temperatures >25°C. This dataset includes 3817 observations, from control (n=1812), first (i.e., lowest or sole) level warming (n=1812), second (higher) level warming (n=179, four studies), and third-level warming (n=14, one study). Experiment locations ranged from 33.5 to 68.4 degrees N latitude and the duration of warming at experiments ranged from <1 to 22 years (average 5.1 y ...
The United States contributed roughly 17 percent of global warming from 1851 to 2023. By contrast, India contributed five percent of warming during this period, despite the country having a far larger population than the United States. In total, G20 countries have contributed approximately three-quarters of global warming to date, while the least developed countries are responsible for just six percent.