The United States had the largest area of genetically modified crops worldwide in 2023, at **** million hectares, followed by Brazil with a little over **** million hectares. Genetically Modified Crop Market In terms of acreage, the most commonly genetically modified crops are soybeans, corn, cotton, and canola as of 2019. In that year, **** percent of all the cotton grown worldwide was genetically modified. The same was true for **** percent of all soybean plants. Because genetic modifications are proprietary, the market for genetically modified seeds and pesticides is heavily concentrated between a few major companies. Monsanto, the biggest player in the genetically modified crop market based on revenue. Consumer Views on Genetically Modified Food Genetically modified foods are very common in the United States. Genetically modified organisms are a controversial topic in the United States, with ** percent of U.S. consumers believing that genetically modified food is less healthy than non-genetically modified food. The overwhelming majority of U.S. consumers believe that products containing GMOs should be labeled as such.

As of 2024, UK consumers between the ages of ** and ** were most concerned about genetically modified food, with ** percent stating they were either highly or somewhat concerned. Only ** percent of consumers between the ages of ** and ** were concerned.

Snapshot img

Genetically Modified (GMO) Food Market Size 2025-2029

The genetically modified (gmo) food market size is forecast to increase by USD 50.5 billion, at a CAGR of 7.2% between 2024 and 2029.

The market is characterized by robust growth, driven primarily by the high demand for increased crop production and advancements in gene-editing technologies. These innovations enable farmers to produce higher yields, improve crop resilience, and enhance nutritional content. However, the market faces significant challenges, including the increasing preference for organic food products. Consumers are increasingly demanding transparency and natural food options, leading companies to invest in organic and non-GMO offerings to cater to this trend. Navigating this dynamic market requires strategic planning and a deep understanding of consumer preferences.
Companies seeking to capitalize on opportunities in the GMO Food Market must balance innovation with consumer demand for natural, organic alternatives. Effective marketing strategies, transparency, and collaboration with stakeholders are essential to meet the evolving needs of consumers and maintain a competitive edge.

What will be the Size of the Genetically Modified (GMO) Food Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019-2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free Sample

The genetically modified (GM) food market continues to evolve, with dynamic market activities shaping its various sectors. International trade remains a significant aspect, as countries navigate complex regulatory frameworks and consumer perception. Quality control is a critical focus, with biotech companies and seed companies implementing rigorous testing and certification processes. In the realm of consumer products, data analytics plays a pivotal role in understanding consumer preferences and optimizing retail channels. Organic farming and sustainable agriculture are gaining traction, as consumers demand transparency and eco-friendly practices. Genome sequencing and agricultural research are advancing, leading to yield enhancement and climate change mitigation.

Biopharmaceutical applications of GM food are on the rise, with potential for carbon sequestration and gene flow. Policy development and regulatory approval are ongoing processes, as governments balance consumer safety, environmental impact, and ethical concerns. Food technology, including food preservation and safety standards, is a crucial aspect of the industry. Farming practices and farm management are evolving, with precision agriculture and pest management strategies becoming more prevalent. Transgenic crops, such as those resistant to agricultural herbicides and insects, are increasingly common. Intellectual property and scientific research are key drivers, as biotech companies invest in new technologies and applications. Consumer education and public awareness are essential, as the industry navigates issues such as food waste reduction, water quality, and labeling regulations.

Sensor networks and herbicide use are areas of ongoing research, with potential for significant advancements in food distribution and food processing. Nutritional content and health effects are constant areas of focus, as consumers seek out healthy and sustainable food options.

How is this Genetically Modified (GMO) Food Industry segmented?

The genetically modified (gmo) food industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD billion' for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019-2023 for the following segments.

Type

  Vegetables
  Crops
  Fruits
  Animal products


Product Type

  Herbicide tolerance (HT)
  Insect resistance (IR)
  Stacked traits (ST)


Crop Type

  Soybean
  Maize
  Cotton
  Canola
  Others


Application

  Food
  Feed
  Pharmaceutical
  Industrial
  Biofuel


Modification Technique

  Gene Editing
  Genetic Engineering
  Molecular Breeding


Geography

  North America

    US
    Canada


  Europe

    France
    Germany


  Middle East and Africa

    South Africa
    UAE


  APAC

    Australia
    China
    India
    Japan


  South America

    Argentina
    Brazil


  Rest of World (ROW)

. By Type Insights

The vegetables segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.

Genetically modified food production continues to evolve, with innovations in gene editing, agricultural research, and food technology driving growth in various sectors. In the supply chain, GMOs enable faster growth and higher yields in vegetables, meeting increasing food demand. These modifications also offer resistance to pests and diseases, reducing the reliance on chemical pesticides and minimizing crop losses. Nigeria's approval of insect

In 2020, ** percent of the soybean crops in the United States were genetically modified to be herbicide tolerant. Genetically modified crops have taken agriculture in the U.S. by storm. By comparison, only ** percent of soybean crops were genetically modified in 1997. Other crops grown in the United States which are mostly genetically modified are cotton and corn. Types of genetic modifications for Crops Herbicide tolerance is one of the most common forms of genetic modification. As the name suggests, these plants are modified so that herbicides meant for weeds will not harm the plant itself, allowing for higher yields and healthier crops. Most of the cotton and corn in the United States is modified to have stacked traits. This refers to the practice of combining several different genes into a single plant. Agricultural production in the United States Gross farming income in the United States has seen an increase since 2000, increasing from about *** billion U.S. dollars to *** billion dollars in 2018. As genetically modified crops became more prevalent during that time period, the total production of soybeans in the United States also grew, amounting to approximately **** billion bushels in 2018. Corn is another important crop in the United States with a variety of different uses, from human consumption to animal feed to ethanol production. Between 2000 and 2018, the area of corn for grain harvested in the U.S. increased by nearly ** million acres.

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner. The UK government-sponsored public debate on the commercialisation of genetically modified (GM) crops that took place place during 2002-2003 was a unique experiment in the governance of technological innovation and risk. The Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (AEBC), itself a novel institutional innovation, signalled the need for such a debate in 2002. Accordingly, the public debate was steered by an independent subcommittee of AEBC, which was named 'GM Nation? The Public Debate'. In November 2002, the 'Understanding Risk' team at the University of East Anglia were appointed as independent evaluators of this important exercise experiment in participatory democracy concerning the possible commercialisation of GM crops in the UK. The evaluation of the debate has mainly been focused upon those directly involved in the debate, including the observation of the debate planning process, observation of both public and closed meetings and issuing questionnaires to the participants of these meetings, interviewing representatives of engaged stakeholder organisations, and monitoring and analysing media coverage of the debate. This study examines the context in which the event-based core of the debate process takes place, and in particular of lay views on that debate. The team recognised the desirability of conducting a more general survey of impacts upon public attitudes towards the end of the debate process. The key objectives of this survey were to: Examine possible shifts in lay sensibilities, awareness and knowledge of risk issues in relation to GM food/crops (comparing data collected in the new survey in July/August 2003 at the end of the debate with that which was obtained in 2002 from the UEA-MORI Risk Survey, 2002 - held at UKDA under SN: 4707). Extend the question set to investigate lay perceptions and understanding of the GM debate process itself. Contribute to the overall evaluation of the debate, and through this to the public policy conclusions to be drawn by AEBC and government.

A team of experts and scholars is formed to review genetically modified food ingredients on a case-by-case basis. This dataset allows for the inquiry of approved genetically modified food ingredients.

A team of experts and scholars is responsible for the strict review of genetically modified food ingredients. This dataset allows for the search of approved genetically modified food ingredients (English version).

The global genetically modified food market is expected to expand consistently, reaching USD 123.4 billion into 2025 to hit USD 250.9 billion by 2035 at a CAGR of 7.4%.

Semi-Annual Update

Country-wise Insights

Competitive Outlook

The GMO Labeled Food Market report segments the industry into By Type (Processed Food, Meat & Poultry, Dairy, Beverage, Other Types), By Distribution Channel (Supermarket/Hypermarket, Convenience Stores, Specialist Stores, Online Retail Stores, Other Distribution Channels), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, South America, Middle East & Africa). Get five years of historical data and five-year market forecasts.

Global Genetically Modified Crops market size is expected to reach $32.35 billion by 2029 at 6.9%, segmented as by trait, herbicide tolerance (ht), insect resistance (ir), stacked traits (st), other traits

Crop yield improvements need to accelerate to avoid future food insecurity. Outside Europe, genetically modified (GM) crops for herbicide- and insect-resistance have been transformative in agriculture; other traits have also come to market. However, GM of yield potential and stress resilience has yet to impact on food security. Genes have been identified for yield such as grain number, size, leaf growth, resource allocation, and signaling for drought tolerance, but there is only one commercialized drought-tolerant GM variety. For GM and genome editing to impact on yield and resilience there is a need to understand yield-determining processes in a cell and developmental context combined with evaluation in the grower environment. We highlight a sugar signaling mechanism as a paradigm for this approach.

The UK government-sponsored public debate on the commercialisation of genetically modified (GM) crops that took place place during 2002-2003 was a unique experiment in the governance of technological innovation and risk. The Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (AEBC), itself a novel institutional innovation, signalled the need for such a debate in 2002. Accordingly, the public debate was steered by an independent subcommittee of AEBC, which was named 'GM Nation? The Public Debate'.

In November 2002, the 'Understanding Risk' team at the University of East Anglia were appointed as independent evaluators of this important exercise experiment in participatory democracy concerning the possible commercialisation of GM crops in the UK. The evaluation of the debate has mainly been focused upon those directly involved in the debate, including the observation of the debate planning process, observation of both public and closed meetings and issuing questionnaires to the participants of these meetings, interviewing representatives of engaged stakeholder organisations, and monitoring and analysing media coverage of the debate.

This study examines the context in which the event-based core of the debate process takes place, and in particular of lay views on that debate. The team recognised the desirability of conducting a more general survey of impacts upon public attitudes towards the end of the debate process. The key objectives of this survey were to: