As of October 2018, more than **** thousand Japanese residents lived in the Gold Coast. The number steadily increased throughout the surveyed period. The statistic, which is based on the information gathered by Japanese diplomatic missions abroad, does not include descendants of Japanese emigrants (nikkeijin) who do not hold Japanese citizenship. People with multiple citizenship are counted.

The polygon represent the historical sphere of influence for Gold Coast Transit District. Gold Coast Transit provides fixed-route bus and paratransit services in the cities of Ojai, Oxnard, Port Hueneme and Ventura, and in the unincorporated County areas between the cities. The service area is approximately 91 square miles with a population of 385,000.Resolution LAFCo 15-09S - Determination of Sphere of Influence Gold Coast Transit District.This resolution was adopted on July 15, 2015.

The Queensland Community Periodic Survey is a cross-sectional survey of gay and homosexually active men recruited at a range of gay community sites around Queensland, including Brisbane, Cairns, the Gold Coast, Rockhampton and Townsville. Data were collected on types of sexual relationships and number of partners, anal and oral intercourse, unprotected anal intercourse, testing for HIV and other STIs, HIV serostatus, recreational drug use, and demographic characteristics such as sexual identity and age.Sample Population: 1,614 gay and homosexually-active men from Brisbane, Cairns, the Gold Coast, Rockhampton and Townsville. Method of Data Collection: Self-completion. Kind of Data: Survey.Sampling Procedures: Men were recruited from 22 data collection siteswhich included social venues (e.g. bars and gyms), gay sex-on-premises venues, sexual health clinics and gay events.Time Dimensions: Repeated cross-sectional study. Conducted between May and September 2011.
http://csrh.arts.unsw.edu.au/research/publications/gcps/

Census employment and income data for persons working in creative industries and creative occupations.

This dataset consists of 14 individual datasets that underpin the interactive dashboards on the project's Data Tables webpage.

Project background:

Australian cultural and creative activity: A population and hotspot analysis is an Australian Research Council Linkage project (LP160101724) being undertaken by QUT and the University of Newcastle, in partnership with Arts Queensland, Create NSW, Creative Victoria, Arts South Australia and the Western Australian Department of Local Government, Sport and Cultural Industries.

This comprehensive project aims to grasp the contemporary dynamics of cultural and creative activity in Australia. It brings together population-level and comparative quantitative and qualitative analyses of local cultural and creative activity. The project will paint a complete national picture, while also exploring the factors that are producing local and regional creative hotspots.

Creative hotspots for study were selected in consultation with state research partners:

Queensland – Cairns, Sunshine Coast + Noosa, Gold Coast, Central West Queensland
New South Wales – Coffs Harbour, Marrickville, Wollongong, Albury
Victoria – Geelong + Surf Coast, Ballarat, Bendigo, Wodonga
Western Australia – Geraldton, Fremantle, Busselton, Albany + Denmark
South Australia – to be confirmed shortly

Statistical summaries drawn from a diverse range of data sources including the Australian Census, the Australian Business Register, IP Australia registration data, infrastructure availability lists and creative grants and rights payments as well as our fieldwork, inform hotspot reports.

Births that occurred by hospital name. Birth events of 5 or more per hospital location are displayed

The European Directive 2002/49/EC on the assessment and management of environmental noise sets out a common approach for all Member States of the European Union to avoid, prevent or reduce as a matter of priority the harmful effects of exposure to noise in the environment. It has been transposed into French law by ordinance, ratified by the Law of 26 October 2005 and is now included in the Environmental Code. This approach is based on noise exposure mapping, population information and implementation of the Environmental Noise Prevention Plan (PPBE) at the local level. Articles L572-1 to L572-11 and R572-1 to R572-11 of the Environmental Code define the competent authorities to adopt noise maps and environmental noise prevention plans. As regards the major road and rail infrastructure of the national network, the noise maps and the PPBEs are adopted by the Prefect, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the circular of 7 June 2007 concerning the drawing up of noise maps and plans for the prevention of environmental noise and by the instruction of 23 July 2008.

In the light of the circular of 7 June 2007 on the preparation of noise maps and environmental noise prevention plans, noise maps are to be drawn up for large infrastructure and in large agglomerations. The following are concerned: — roadways used by more than 8200 vehicles/d — railways with more than 82 train crossings/d — agglomerations with a population of more than 100 000 inhabitants

Map of areas affected by noise or type B map: map representing the sectors affected by noise, defined in prefectural sound classification orders (Article 5 of Decree No 95-21 of 9 January 1995). The classification of land transport infrastructures (ITT)of Côte d’Or was revised and validated on 25 September 2012 by Prefectural Order No 398.

Summary counts (and per 100,000 population estimate) of each simulation.

The region of coastal South East Queensland (SEQ) represents a large concentration of population, business activity and infrastructure important to the economy of Queensland and Australia. The region is also subject to severe storms that can generate damaging winds, particularly as a result of thunderstorm and tropical cyclone activity. Older residential homes have historically been the most damaged in such storms, contributing disproportionately to community risk, and recent storm damage in Western Australia has indicated that there are issues with modern SEQ homes also. This risk posed by severe wind is not well understood, nor are the optimal strategies for managing and potentially reducing this risk. Previous work has provided insights into the potential impacts of rare storm events in the SEQ region and the vulnerability of residential homes that contribute to them. The Severe Wind Hazard Assessment for Queensland (SWHAQ) project (Arthur, et al., 2021) provided valuable insights on the potential impacts of rare tropical cyclones making landfall in the region. The SWHA-Q project included two storms impacting the Gold Coast that highlighted that credible cyclone events in South East Queensland generating no more than design level wind gusts can have challenging consequences.

Five tropical cyclone scenario events were selected by the project partners and modelled to provide a demonstration of the residential housing damage outcomes that could result from plausible storms that could impact South East Queensland. Four storms generated category 3 winds (gusts over 165 km/h) on landfall and were essentially design level events for ordinary residential structures. The fifth (Scenario 3) generated category 4 winds (gusts over 225 km/h) at landfall but was still quite a credible storm for the region. The events highlighted, as did the previous SWHA-Q work, that rare cyclone events of this kind affect all parts of the study region and produce very significant consequences. One design level event (Scenario 2) was found to inflict moderate or greater damage to 39% of the homes in the region, representing a major need for temporary accommodation. One of the events was used as the evidence-based scenario that underpinned Exercise Averruncus – A SEQ Tropical Cyclone Impact held in Brisbane on 15 June 2022 that explored critical issues around preparation for, response to, and initial recovery from the event. It is noted that the scale of impacts from any scenario is contingent on the characteristics of the TC itself (size, intensity, landfall location) and on the landscape in which buildings are located. However, while each scenario is unique, the suite of scenario impacts provide a useful resource for EM planning by local government, emergency services and other agencies with a role in disaster recovery.

The European Directive 2002/49/EC on the assessment and management of environmental noise sets out a common approach for all Member States of the European Union to avoid, prevent or reduce as a matter of priority the harmful effects of exposure to noise in the environment. It has been transposed into French law by ordinance, ratified by the Law of 26 October 2005 and is now included in the Environmental Code. This approach is based on noise exposure mapping, population information and implementation of the Environmental Noise Prevention Plan (PPBE) at the local level. Articles L572-1 to L572-11 and R572-1 to R572-11 of the Environmental Code define the competent authorities to adopt noise maps and environmental noise prevention plans. As regards the major road and rail infrastructure of the national network, the noise maps and the PPBEs are adopted by the Prefect, in accordance with the conditions laid down in the circular of 7 June 2007 concerning the drawing up of noise maps and plans for the prevention of environmental noise and by the instruction of 23 July 2008.

In the light of the circular of 7 June 2007 on the preparation of noise maps and environmental noise prevention plans, noise maps are to be drawn up for large infrastructure and in large agglomerations. The following are concerned: — roadways used by more than 8200 vehicles/d — railways with more than 82 train crossings/d — agglomerations with a population of more than 100 000 inhabitants

Map of areas affected by noise or type B map: map representing the sectors affected by noise, defined in prefectural sound classification orders (Article 5 of Decree No 95-21 of 9 January 1995). The classification of land transport infrastructures (ITT)of Côte d’Or was revised and validated on 25 September 2012 by Prefectural Order No 398.