15 datasets found
  1. San Francisco Airbnb (Sep2024)

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jan 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Carlos Egana (2025). San Francisco Airbnb (Sep2024) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/carlosegaa/san-francisco-airbnb-sep2024
    Explore at:
    zip(8452046 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2025
    Authors
    Carlos Egana
    Area covered
    San Francisco
    Description

    Context San Francisco, known for its iconic Golden Gate Bridge, steep hills, and vibrant neighborhoods, has become a hotspot for travelers seeking unique stays and authentic local experiences. This dataset provides a detailed snapshot of Airbnb activity in San Francisco, California, offering insights into short-term rental trends, pricing dynamics, and guest reviews.

    Content The dataset consists of three key files that capture different aspects of Airbnb activity in San Francisco:

    Listings Data (listings.csv.gz): Comprehensive details about Airbnb listings, including descriptions, host information, and average review scores. Calendar Data (calendar.csv.gz): Daily availability and pricing for each listing, ideal for analyzing seasonal trends and price fluctuations. Reviews Data (reviews.csv.gz): Detailed guest reviews, including unique reviewer IDs, comments, and timestamps, offering insights into guest experiences and sentiments. Inspiration This dataset offers numerous opportunities for analysis and exploration:

    Neighborhood Vibes: Can you identify the unique character of San Francisco’s neighborhoods based on listing descriptions? Seasonality Trends: When is the best time to visit San Francisco, and how do rental prices change throughout the year? Market Dynamics: Is there evidence of growth in Airbnb activity, such as an increase in new listings or guest reviews? Uncover hidden patterns in San Francisco’s Airbnb market and dive into the data to learn more about this iconic city! 🌉

  2. n

    Source Data for Crowdsourcing Bridge Dynamic Monitoring with Smartphone...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • dataone.org
    • +2more
    zip
    Updated Nov 2, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Thomas Matarazzo; Daniel Kondor; Sebastiano Milardo; Soheil Eshkevari; Paolo Santi; Shamim Pakzad; Markus Buehler; Carlo Ratti (2022). Source Data for Crowdsourcing Bridge Dynamic Monitoring with Smartphone Vehicle Trips [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.zs7h44jcw
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 2, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    Lehigh University
    Complexity Science Hub Vienna
    United States Military Academy
    Authors
    Thomas Matarazzo; Daniel Kondor; Sebastiano Milardo; Soheil Eshkevari; Paolo Santi; Shamim Pakzad; Markus Buehler; Carlo Ratti
    License

    https://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.htmlhttps://spdx.org/licenses/CC0-1.0.html

    Description

    This data accompanies the study "Crowdsourcing Bridge Dynamic Monitoring with Smartphone Vehicle Trips" published in (Nature) Communications Engineering. This paper focuses on using large and inexpsensive datasets for obtaining information on the dynamics of bridges. In this study, data is collected by smartphones in moving vehicles as the cross over a bridge, in three distinct applications. Smartphone data was collected in controlled field experiments and uncontrolled Uber rides on a long-span suspension bridge in the USA (The Golden Gate Bridge) and an analytical method was developed to accurately recover modal properties. The method was also successfully applied to partially-controlled crowdsourced data collected on a short-span highway bridge in Italy. The results suggest that larve and inexpensive datasets collected by smartphones could play a role in monitoring the health of existing transportation infrastructure. The data provided includes the source data for the figures in the publication as well as the "controlled data" referenced in the study. Methods All data were recorded by an iPhone 5 and iPhone 6 using the Sensor Play App. Two-hundred and four datasets (102 per phone) were collected during vehicle trips over the Golden Gate Bridge in morning and afternoon rush-hour periods over five days (June 18 - 22, 2017). The positions and orientations of the phones were fixed during data collection. The operator manually hit "record" on each phones at the approach of the bridge and hit "stop" at the end of the bridge -- the data is not syncrhonized. Two sedan-style vehicles were used and five target speeds were defined: 32, 40, 48, 56, and 64 km/hr (note the speed limit on the bridge is 72 km/hr). Datasets 1-50 were collected by a Nissan sedan, and datasets 51-102 were collected by a Ford sedan. Each dataset is provided as a CSV file with twenty-four channels of raw data including timestamps, the default output for the Sensor Play App:

    Accelerometer: X, Y, Z Gyroscope: X, Y, Z Attitude: Roll, Pitch, Yaw Location: Longitude, Latitude, Speed, TrueHeading, Altitude Motion Activity: Type & Confidence Barometer: Pressure, Relative Altitude Magnetometer: µT X, Y, Z, calibrated x,y,z,

    The referenced study "Crowdsourcing Bridge Dynamic Monitoring with Smartphone Vehicle Trips" only analyzed vertical acceleration (acceleration in the Z-direction) and GPS lat-long channels, which were sampled at 100 Hz and 1 Hz, respectively. Further details of the data and analysis are available in the Methods section of "Crowdsourcing Bridge Dynamic Monitoring with Smartphone Vehicle Trips". Source data is provided for figures 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 in the Main Text of "Crowdsourcing Bridge Dynamic Monitoring with Smartphone Vehicle Trips" and figures S1, S2, and S3 of the Supplementary Material

  3. Vegetation - San Mateo County [ds3021]

    • data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Aug 15, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2025). Vegetation - San Mateo County [ds3021] [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/vegetation-san-mateo-county-ds30211
    Explore at:
    arcgis geoservices rest api, zip, html, kml, csv, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 15, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    San Mateo County
    Description

    In 2018, the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy (Parks Conservancy) (https://parksconservancy.org), non-profit support partner to the National Park Service (NPS) Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA), initiated a fine scale vegetation mapping project in Marin County. The GGNRA includes lands in San Francisco and San Mateo counties, and NPS expressed interest in pursuing fine scale vegetation mapping for those lands as well. The Parks Conservancy facilitated multiple meetings with potential project stakeholders and was able to build a consortium of funders to map all of San Mateo County (and NPS lands in San Francisco). The consortium included the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (MROSD), Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST), San Mateo City/County Association of Governments, and various County of San Mateo departments including Parks, Agricultural Weights and Measures, Public Works/Flood Control District, Office of Sustainability, and Planning and Building. Over a 3-year period, the project, collectively referred to as the “San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map”, has produced numerous environmental GIS products including 1-foot contours, orthophotography, and other land cover maps. A 106-class fine-scale vegetation map was completed in April 2022 that details vegetation communities and agricultural land cover types, including forests, grasslands, riparian vegetation, wetlands, and croplands. The environmental data products from the San Mateo Fine Scale Veg Map are foundational and can be used by organizations and government departments for a wide range of purposes, including planning, conservation, and to track changes over time to San Mateo County’s habitats and natural resources.

    Development of the San Mateo fine-scale vegetation map was managed by the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy and staffed by personnel from Tukman Geospatial (https://tukmangeospatial.com/), Aerial Information Systems (AIS; http://www.aisgis.com/), and Kass Green and Associates. The fine-scale vegetation map effort included field surveys by a team of trained botanists including Neal Kramer, Brett Hall, Lucy Ferneyhough, Brittany Burnett, Patrick Furtado, and Rosie Frederick. Data from these surveys, combined with older surveys from previous efforts, were analyzed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Vegetation Program (https://www.cnps.org/vegetation), with support from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP; https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP) and ecologists with NatureServe (https://www.natureserve.org/) to develop a San Mateo County-specific vegetation classification. For more information on the field sampling and vegetation classification work San Mateo County Fine Scale Vegetation Map Final Report refer to the final report (https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=212663) issued by CNPS and corresponding floristic descriptions (https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=212666 and https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=212667).

    Existing lidar data, collected in 2017 by San Mateo County was used to support the project. The lidar point cloud, and many of its derivatives, were used extensively during the process of developing the fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. The lidar data was used in conjunction with optical data. Optical data used throughout the project included 6-inch resolution airborne 4-band imagery collected in the summer of 2018, as well as various dates of National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery. Key data sets used in the lifeform and the enhanced lifeform mapping process include high resolution aerial imagery from 2018, the lidar-derived Canopy Height Model (CHM), and several other lidar-derived raster and vector datasets. In addition, a number of forest structure lidar derivatives are used in the machine learning portion of the enhanced lifeform workflow.

    In 2020, an enhanced lifeform map was produced which serves as the foundation for the much more floristically detailed fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. The lifeform map was developed using expert systems rulesets in Trimble Ecognition®, followed by manual editing.

    In 2020, Tukman Geospatial staff and partners conducted countywide reconnaissance field work to support fine-scale mapping. Field-collected data were used to train automated machine learning algorithms, which produced a fully automated countywide fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. Throughout 2021, AIS manually edited the fine-scale maps, and Tukman Geospatial and AIS went to the field for validation trips to inform and improve the manual editing process. In early January of 2022, draft maps were distributed and reviewed by San Mateo County’s community of land managers and by the funders of the project. Input from these groups was used to further refine the map. The countywide fine-scale vegetation map and related data products were made public in April 2022. In total, 106 vegetation classes were mapped. During the classification development phase, minimum mapping units (MMUs) were established for the vegetation mapping project. An MMU is the smallest area to be mapped on the ground. For this project, the mapping team chose to map different features at different MMUs. The MMU is 1/4 acre for agricultural, woody riparian, and wetland herbaceous classes; 1/2 acre for woody upland, upland herbaceous, and bare land classes; 1/5 acre for developed feature types; and 400 square feet for water.

    Accuracy assessment plot data were collected in 2021 and 2022. Accuracy assessment results were compiled and analyzed in the April of 2022. Overall accuracy of the lifeform map is 98 percent. Overall accuracy of the fine-scale vegetation map is 83.5 percent, with an overall ‘fuzzy’ accuracy of 90.8 percent.

  4. Shoreline Mapping Program of San Francisco Bay, Golden Gate to Point...

    • fisheries.noaa.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 1, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Geodetic Survey (2021). Shoreline Mapping Program of San Francisco Bay, Golden Gate to Point Chauncey, CA, CA1212D-CM-N [Dataset]. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/65642
    Explore at:
    pdf - adobe portable document formatAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. National Geodetic Survey
    Time period covered
    Apr 28, 2013 - Sep 5, 2013
    Area covered
    Description

    These data provide an accurate high-resolution shoreline compiled from imagery of San Francisco Bay, Golden Gate to Point Chauncey, CA . This vector shoreline data is based on an office interpretation of imagery that may be suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. This metadata describes information for both the line and point shapefiles. The NGS attribution scheme 'Coast...

  5. d

    Commodifying infrastructure spatial dynamics with crowdsourced smartphone...

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Liam Cronin; Soheil Sadeghi; Thomas Matarazzo; Sebastiano Milardo; Iman Dabbaghchian; Paolo Santi; Umberto Fugiglando; Shamim Pakzad (2025). Commodifying infrastructure spatial dynamics with crowdsourced smartphone data [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.15dv41p49
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Liam Cronin; Soheil Sadeghi; Thomas Matarazzo; Sebastiano Milardo; Iman Dabbaghchian; Paolo Santi; Umberto Fugiglando; Shamim Pakzad
    Description

    Structural information deficits about our aging bridges have led to several avoidable catastrophes in recent years. Data-driven methods for bridge vibration monitoring enable frequent, accurate structural assessments; however, the high costs of large-scale deployments of these systems make important condition information a luxury for bridge owners. Smartphone-based monitoring is inexpensive yet has produced structural information, i.e., modal frequencies, in crowdsensing applications. However, current methods cannot extract spatial vibration characteristics, which are needed for damage identification. Here we present the most extensive real-world study on bridge monitoring with crowdsourced smartphone-vehicle trips and simulate damage detection capabilities. Our method analyzes over 500 trips across four bridges with main spans ranging from 30 to 1300 meters in length, representing about one-quarter of US bridges, and extracts absolute value mode shapes, a damage-sensitive feature. We d..., This data set was collected from various sources: the research team, ANAS employees, and Uber drivers. The method for data collection and data processing for each dataset can be found in the related works. , , # Commodifying infrastructure spatial dynamics with crowdsourced smartphone data

    https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.15dv41p49

    The dataset consists of acceleration and position measurements taken using smartphones as vehicles drove across various bridges. Current projects using this data revolve around mobile sensing and system identification. The accelerations were measured using the smartphone's onboard triaxial accelerometer. However, the position measurements are a process version of the GPS measurements. The position measurements are 1D distance from a bridge pier, measured in meters, rather than the raw 2D GPS measurements from the phone. Within this repository, there are multiple case studies, and between cases, the method of data collection varied. The methods for data collection can be found in the related work. A Jupyter Notebook accompanies the datasets to reproduce the Golden Gate Bridge absolute mode shape results in the related work....

  6. San Francisco Weather Data

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Mar 11, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Noahx1 (2023). San Francisco Weather Data [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/noahx1/san-francisco-weather-data/data
    Explore at:
    zip(108358 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 11, 2023
    Authors
    Noahx1
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Area covered
    San Francisco
    Description

    About San Francisco San Francisco is a vibrant and dynamic city located on the west coast of the United States, in the state of California. Known for its hilly terrain, diverse neighborhoods, and iconic landmarks such as the Golden Gate Bridge and Alcatraz Island, San Francisco is a hub of culture, creativity, and innovation. The city is renowned for its world-class restaurants, thriving arts scene, and historic architecture, and is home to many tech companies and startups. With its mild climate, stunning views, and rich history, San Francisco is a must-visit destination for travelers from around the world.

    About Dataset This dataset contains daily weather observations for San Francisco, USA from January 1, 1993 to January 1, 2023. The data is collected from Meteostat. The dataset contains 10 columns with 10958 rows.

  7. Shoreline Data Rescue Project of Bay Area of CA, Golden Gate Entrance, CA,...

    • fisheries.noaa.gov
    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jan 1, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    National Geodetic Survey (2020). Shoreline Data Rescue Project of Bay Area of CA, Golden Gate Entrance, CA, CA37C10 [Dataset]. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/inport/item/62030
    Explore at:
    pdf - adobe portable document formatAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 1, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. National Geodetic Survey
    Time period covered
    May 1, 1877
    Area covered
    Description

    These data were automated to provide an accurate high-resolution historical shoreline of Bay Area of CA, Golden Gate Entrance, CA suitable as a geographic information system (GIS) data layer. These data are derived from shoreline maps that were produced by the NOAA National Ocean Service including its predecessor agencies which were based on an office interpretation of imagery and/or field s...

  8. a

    Active Streets (CNNs, from DataSF, pulled nightly)

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Sep 30, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City and County of San Francisco (2025). Active Streets (CNNs, from DataSF, pulled nightly) [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/sfgov::active-streets-cnns-from-datasf-pulled-nightly?uiVersion=content-views
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 30, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City and County of San Francisco
    License

    ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    A. SUMMARY A list of street centerlines, including both active and retired streets. These centerlines are identified by their Centerline Network Number ("CNN").B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED This data is extracted from the Department of Public Works Basemap. Supervisor District and Analysis Neighborhood are added during the loading process. These boundaries utilize the centroid (middle) of the line to determine the district or neighborhood.C. UPDATE PROCESS This dataset refreshes daily, though the data may not change every day.D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET Note 1: The Class Code field is used for symbolization:1 = Freeway2 = Major street/Highway3 = Arterial street4 = Collector Street5 = Residential Street6 = Freeway Ramp0 = Other (private streets, paper street, etc.)E. RELATED DATASETS Understanding street-level dataData pushed to ArcGIS Online on November 10, 2025 at 3:25 AM by SFGIS.Data from: https://data.sfgov.org/d/3psu-pn9hDescription of dataset columns:

     cnn
     Centerline Network Number - unique identifier for dataset
    
    
     lf_fadd
     From address number on left side of street, the lowest number in the address range
    
    
     lf_toadd
     To address number on left side of street, the highest number in the address range
    
    
     rt_fadd
     From address number on right side of street, the lowest number in the address range
    
    
     rt_toadd
     To address number on right side of street, the highest number in the address range
    
    
     street
     Street name without street type
    
    
     st_type
     Street Type (AVE, ST, BLVD, et al.)
    
    
     f_st
     The street name of the segment intersects at its beginning.
    
    
     t_st
     The street name of the segment intersects at its end.
    
    
     f_node_cnn
     Centerline Network Number for the node/intersection that the street segment begins from.
    
    
     t_node_cnn
     Centerline Network Number for the node/intersection that the street segment ends on.
    
    
     accepted
     Accepted by City and County of San Francisco for maintenance.
    
    
     active
     Active street segment, i.e., not retired.
    
    
     classcode
     Classification code for street segment. Used for symbolization: 1 = Freeway 2 = Major street/Highway 3 = Arterial street 4 = Collector Street 5 = Residential Street 6 = Freeway Ramp 0 = Other (private streets, paper street, etc.)
    
    
     date_added
     Date added to dataset by Public Works.
    
    
     date_altered
     Date altered to dataset by Public Works.
    
    
     date_dropped
     Date dropped to dataset by Public Works.
    
    
     gds_chg_id_add
     The internal change transaction id when the segment was added.
    
    
     gds_chg_id_altered
     The internal change transaction id when the segment was altered.
    
    
     gds_chg_id_dropped
     The internal change transaction id when the segment was dropped/retired.
    
    
     jurisdiction
     Agency with jurisdiction over the segment, if any.
    
    
     layer
     Derived from the source AutoCAD drawing, this field indicates the category of segment. Definitions for each of the values: Freeways such as 80, 280 and 101. Paper, the centerline segment is present on Assessor and/or Public Works map, but is not an actual street in reality. Paper_fwys, the centerline segment is present on Assessor and/or Public Works map, but is not an actual street in reality, and is under or near a freeway. Paper_water, the centerline segment is present on Assessor and/or Public Works map, but is not an actual street in reality, and is under water in the Bay. PARKS, street segement maintained by Recreation and Park Department, e.g., in Golden Gate Park. Parks_NPS_FtMaso, street segement maintained by the National Park Service within Fort Mason. Parks_NPS_Presid, street segement maintained by the National Park Service within the Presidio. Private, street segment is not maintained by the City and is not on an Assessor or Public Works map. Private_parking, street segment is not maintained by the City and is not on an Assessor or Public Works map, and is a parking lot. PSEUDO, street segment created for use in addressing. Streets, standard street centerline segement. Streets_HuntersP, standard street centerline segement within the Hunters Point Shipyard area. Streets_Pedestri, standard street centerline segement, but pedestrian access only. Streets_TI, standard street centerline segement within Treasure Island. Streets_YBI, standard street centerline segement within Yerba Buena Island. UPROW, Unpaved Right of Way street centerline segment.
    
    
     nhood
     SFRealtor-defined neighborhood that the segment is primarily intersects
    
    
     oneway
     Indicates if street segment is a one way street: possible values are F (the segment is one way beginning at the "from" street) , T (the segment is one way beginning at the "to" street), or B (traffic is legal in "both" directions)
    
    
     street_gc
     Street name without street type, with the numbered streets with leading zeroes dropped to facilitate geocoding
    
    
     streetname
     Full street name and street type
    
    
     streetname_gc
     Full street name and street type, with the numbered streets with leading zeroes dropped to facilitate geocoding
    
    
     zip_code
     ZIP Code that street segment falls in.
    
    
     analysis_neighborhood
     current analysis neighborhood
    
    
     supervisor_district
     current supervisor district
    
    
     line
     Geometry
    
    
     data_as_of
     Timestamp the data was updated in the source system
    
    
     data_loaded_at
     Timestamp the data was loaded to the open data portal
    

    Note: If no description was provided by DataSF, the cell is left blank. See the source data for more information.

  9. d

    Golden Gate climatic data 2010

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jan 6, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Weather Bureau (2015). Golden Gate climatic data 2010 [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/peggym.1108.55
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    SANParks Data Repository
    Authors
    Weather Bureau
    Time period covered
    Sep 2, 2010
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    T, CU, HU, RH, Rn, Tn, Tx, WS, DOY, Day, and 6 more
    Description

    Climatic data from Golden Gate from 2010. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/peggym.1108.55 for complete metadata about this dataset.

  10. Vegetation - Marin County [ds2960]

    • data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +6more
    Updated Jul 24, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2025). Vegetation - Marin County [ds2960] [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/vegetation-marin-county-ds29601
    Explore at:
    zip, html, arcgis geoservices rest api, kml, csv, geojsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Marin County
    Description

    The Tamalpais Lands Collaborative (One Tam; https://www.onetam.org/), the network of organizations that manage lands on Mount Tamalpais in Marin County, initiated the countywide mapping project with their interest in creating a seamless, comprehensive map depicting vegetation communities across the landscape. With support from their non-profit partner the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy (https://www.parksconservancy.org/) One Tam was able to build a consortium to fund and implement the countywide fine scale vegetation map.

    Development of the Marin fine-scale vegetation map was managed by the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy and staffed by personnel from Tukman Geospatial (https://tukmangeospatial.com/) Aerial Information Systems (AIS; http://www.aisgis.com/), and Kass Green and Associates. The fine-scale vegetation map effort included field surveys by a team of trained botanists. Data from these surveys, combined with older surveys from previous efforts, were analyzed by the California Native Plant Society (CNPS) Vegetation Program (https://www.cnps.org/vegetation) with support from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP; https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/VegCAMP) to develop a Marin County-specific vegetation classification.

    High density lidar data was obtained countywide in the early winter of 2019 to support the project. The lidar point cloud, and many of its derivatives, were used extensively during the process of developing the fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. The lidar data was used in conjunction with optical data. Optical data used throughout the project included 6-inch resolution airborne 4-band imagery collected in the summer of 2018, as well as 6-inch imagery from 2014 and various dates of National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) imagery.

    In 2019, a 26-class lifeform map was produced which serves as the foundation for the much more floristically detailed fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. The lifeform map was developed using expert systems rulesets in Trimble Ecognition®, followed by manual editing.

    In 2019, Tukman Geospatial staff and partners conducted countywide reconnaissance fieldwork to support fine-scale mapping. Field-collected data were used to train automated machine learning algorithms, which produced a fully automated countywide fine-scale vegetation and habitat map. Throughout 2020, AIS manually edited the fine-scale maps, and Tukman Geospatial and AIS went to the field for validation trips to inform and improve the manual editing process. In the spring of 2021, draft maps were distributed and reviewed by Marin County's community of land managers and by the funders of the project. Input from these groups was used to further refine the map. The countywide fine-scale vegetation map and related data products were made public in June 2021. In total, 107 vegetation classes were mapped with a minimum mapping size of one fifth to one acre, varying by class.

    Accuracy assessment plot data were collected in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Accuracy assessment results were compiled and analyzed in the summer of 2021. Overall accuracy of the lifeformmap is 95%. Overall accuracy of the fine-scale vegetation map is 77%, with an overall 'fuzzy' accuracy of 81%.

    The Marin County fine-scale vegetation map was designed for a broad audience for use at many floristic and spatial scales. At its most floristically resolute scale, the fine-scale vegetation map depicts the landscape at the National Vegetation Classification alliance level - which characterizes stands of vegetation generally by the dominant species present. This product is useful to managers interested in specific information about vegetation composition. For those interested in general land use and land cover, the lifeform map may be more appropriate. Tomake the information contained in the map accessible to the most users, the vegetation map is published as a suite of GIS deliverables available in a number of formats. Map products are being made available wherever possible by the project stakeholders, including the regional data portal Pacific Veg Map (http://pacificvegmap.org/data-downloads).

  11. Vegetation - Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties [ds3116]

    • data.ca.gov
    • data.cnra.ca.gov
    • +5more
    Updated Jun 27, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2025). Vegetation - Santa Clara and Santa Cruz Counties [ds3116] [Dataset]. https://data.ca.gov/dataset/vegetation-santa-clara-and-santa-cruz-counties-ds31161
    Explore at:
    xlsx, kml, csv, txt, zip, arcgis geoservices rest api, gpkg, gdb, geojson, htmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 27, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    California Department of Fish and Wildlifehttps://wildlife.ca.gov/
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Santa Clara
    Description

    Under contract to the Santa Cruz Mountains Stewardship Network with support from the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy, and staffed by personnel from Tukman Geospatial, Aerial Information Systems (AIS), and Kass Green and Associates, Tukman Geospatial and Aerial Information Systems created a fine-scale vegetation map of portions of Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties. CDFW’s Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program (VegCAMP) provided in-kind service to allocate and score the AA.

    The mapping study area, consists of approximately 1,133,106.8 acres, of Santa Clara and Santa Cruz counties. Work was performed on the project between 2020 and 2023. The Santa Cruz and Santa Clara fine-scale vegetation map was designed for a broad audience for use at many floristic and spatial scales and is useful to managers interested in specific information about vegetation composition and forest health.

    CNPS under separate contract and in collaboration with CDFW VegCAMP developed the floristic vegetation classification used for the project. The floristic classification follows protocols compliant with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) and National Vegetation Classification Standards (NVCS).

    The vegetation map was produced with countywide vegetation survey data and combined with surveys from CNPS. Trimble® Ecognition® followed by manual image interpretation that was used to map lifeforms. Fine-scale segmentation was conducted using Trimble Ecognition® and relies on summer 2020 4-band NAIP, the 2020 lidar-derived canopy height model, and a suite of spectral indices derived from the NAIP. They utilized a type of algorithmic data modeling known as machine learning to automate the classification of fine-scale segments into one of Santa Cruz and Santa Clara Counties 121 fine-scale map classes. The minimum mapping unit (MMU) is set by feature type. For agricultural classes, the MMU is 1/4 acre, for woody upland classes is 1/2 acre, woody riparian is 1/4 acre, upland herbaceous is 1/2 acre, wetland herbaceous is 1/4 acre. Bare land is 1/2 acre, impervious features is 1000 square feet, while developed is 1/5 acre and water is 400 square feet.

    Field reconnaissance and accuracy assessment enhanced map quality. There was a total of 121 mapping classes. The overall Fuzzy Accuracy Assessment rating for the final vegetation map, map at the Alliance and Group levels, is 92 percent. More information can be found in the project report, which is bundled with the vegetation map published for BIOS here: https://filelib.wildlife.ca.gov/Public/BDB/GIS/BIOS/Public_Datasets/3100_3199/ds3116.zip.

  12. d

    Golden Gate HIghland National Park monthly temperature and rainfall

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jun 11, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SANParks (2013). Golden Gate HIghland National Park monthly temperature and rainfall [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/peggym.1205.7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 11, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    SANParks Data Repository
    Authors
    SANParks
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Apl, Aug, Dec, Feb, Jan, Jul, Jun, Mar, May, Nov, and 3 more
    Description

    No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/peggym.1205.7 for complete metadata about this dataset.

  13. WATER TEMPERATURE and other data from GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, SEALIFT ARCTIC and...

    • dataone.org
    Updated May 7, 2018
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NOAA NCEI Environmental Data Archive (2018). WATER TEMPERATURE and other data from GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE, SEALIFT ARCTIC and other platforms in the Mediterranean Sea - Western Basin, NE Atlantic and other waters from 1980-03-22 to 1988-06-29 (NODC Accession 8800109) [Dataset]. https://dataone.org/datasets/%7BB2ED68F2-0DAD-4A6D-8B4C-22E014BC8AA1%7D
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administrationhttp://www.noaa.gov/
    National Centers for Environmental Informationhttps://www.ncei.noaa.gov/
    Time period covered
    Mar 22, 1980 - Jun 29, 1988
    Area covered
    Arctic,
    Description

    No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/%7BB2ED68F2-0DAD-4A6D-8B4C-22E014BC8AA1%7D for complete metadata about this dataset.

  14. d

    Geology and geomorphology--Offshore of San Francisco Map Area, California

    • dataone.org
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +3more
    Updated May 4, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    H.G. Greene; S.Y. Johnson; M.W. Manson; S.R. Hartwell; C.A. Endris; T.R. Bruns (2017). Geology and geomorphology--Offshore of San Francisco Map Area, California [Dataset]. https://dataone.org/datasets/b45a8e51-b0fc-4d6d-a945-b19caa72618d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 4, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Authors
    H.G. Greene; S.Y. Johnson; M.W. Manson; S.R. Hartwell; C.A. Endris; T.R. Bruns
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2006 - Jan 1, 2010
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    Shape, RuleID, MapUnit, OBJECTID, Shape_Area, Shape_Length, MapUnitAbbrev
    Description

    This part of DS 781 presents data for the geologic and geomorphic map of the Offshore of San Francisco map area, California. The polygon shapefile is included in "Geology_OffshoreSanFrancisco.zip," which is accessible from http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/OffshoreSanFrancisco/data_catalog_OffshoreSanFrancisco.html.

    The Offshore of San Francisco map area includes the Golden Gate inlet which connects the Pacific Ocean and San Francisco Bay. San Francisco Bay, the largest estuary on the U.S. west coast, is located at the mouth of the Sacramento and San Joaquin rivers and drains over 40 percent of the state of California. The large surface area of the bay and diurnal tidal range of 1.78 m creates an enormous tidal prism (about 2 billion cu m) and strong tidal currents, commonly exceeding 2.5 m/s (Barnard and others, 2006a, 2006b, 2007). Acceleration of these currents through the constricted inlet has led to scouring of a bedrock channel that has a maximum depth of 113 m. Large fields of sand waves (Barnard and others, 2007) (unit Qmsw) have formed both west and east of this channel as flow expands and tidal currents decelerate. Active tidally influenced map units inside San Francisco Bay also include sand-dominated deposits (unit Qbs) and more coarse-grained sand, gravel, and pebble deposits (unit Qbsc). Sand wave fields resulting from tidal flow are also present in the nearshore along the Pacific Coast, both north and south of the Golden Gate inlet. The sand wave fields appear to be variably mobilized by both ebb and flood tides, but the presence of a large (~150 sq km) ebb-tidal delta at the mouth of the bay west of the inlet indicates net sediment transport has been to the west. The ebb-tidal delta west of the Golden Gate inlet is mapped as two units. The inner part of the delta (unit Qmst) comprises a semi-circular, inward-sloping (i.e., toward the Golden Gate inlet), sandy seafloor at water depths of about 12 to 24 m. This inner delta has a notably smooth surface, indicating sediment transport and deposition under different flow regimes (defined by tidal current strength and depth) than those in which the sand waves formed and are maintained.

    Further deceleration of tidal currents beyond the inner delta has led to development of a large, shoaling (about 8 to 12 m water depth), horse-shoe shaped, delta-mouth bar (unit Qmsb). This feature (the "San Francisco Bar") surrounds the inner delta, and its central crest is cut by a dredged shipping channel that separates the nothern and southern parts of the bar, the "North Bar" and "South Bar," respectively. The San Francisco Bar is shaped by both tidal currents and waves, which regularly exceed 6 m in height on the continental shelf during major winter storms (Barnard and others, 2007). This mix of tidal and wave influence results in a variably hummocky, mottled, and rilled seafloor, and this surface texture is used as a primary criteria for mapping the unit and defining its boundaries. Outside the San Francisco Bar to the limits of the map area, the notably flat shelf (less than 0.2 degrees) and the nearshore are wave-dominated and characterized by sandy marine sediment (unit Qms). Local zones of wave-winnowed (?) coarser sediment (unit Qmsc) indicated by high backscatter occur along the coast offshore Ocean Beach. Unit Qmsc is also mapped inside and at the mouth of the Golden Gate inlet where it presumably results from winnowing by strong tidal currents. Coarser sediment also occurs as winnowed lags in rippled scour depressions (unit Qmss), recognized on the basis of high-resolution bathymetry and backscatter. These depressions are typically a few tens of centimeters deep and are bounded by mobile sand sheets (for example, Cacchione and others, 1984). This unit occurs primarily in the nearshore south of the Golden Gate inlet offshore of Ocean Beach (water depth less than 13 m) and north of the inlet offshore Muir Beach (water depth less than 17 m).

    Artificial seafloor (unit af) has several distinct map occurrences: (1) sites of active sand mining inside San Francisco Bay; (2) the dredged shipping channel at the central crest of the San Francisco Bar; (3) the sewage outfall pipe, associated rip rap, and surrounding scour channel offshore Ocean Beach; and (4) the location of a former waste disposal site about 2.5 km offshore Point Lobos.

    Although the map shows the areas in which several active sedimentary units (Qmsw, Qmst, Qmsb, Qms, Qmsc, Qmss, Qbsm, Qbsc) presently occur, it is important to note that map units and contacts are dynamic and ephemeral, likely to change during large storms, and on seasonal to decadal scales based on changing external forces such as weather, climate, sea level, and sediment supply. Dallas and Barnard (2011) have noted, for example, that the ebb-tidal delta has dramatically shrunk since 1873 when the first bathymetric s... Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/b45a8e51-b0fc-4d6d-a945-b19caa72618d for complete metadata about this dataset.

  15. Golden Gate Highland National Parks Census Data.

    • search.dataone.org
    Updated Jan 6, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SANParks (2015). Golden Gate Highland National Parks Census Data. [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/peggym.113.9
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 6, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    South African National Parkshttp://www.sanparks.org/
    Authors
    SANParks
    Time period covered
    Aug 14, 1998 - Feb 13, 2004
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    ID, Area, Date, Male, Time, Female, Species, Unknown, Accuracy, Altitude, and 21 more
    Description

    No description is available. Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/peggym.113.9 for complete metadata about this dataset.

  16. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Carlos Egana (2025). San Francisco Airbnb (Sep2024) [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/carlosegaa/san-francisco-airbnb-sep2024
Organization logo

San Francisco Airbnb (Sep2024)

Dataset for SQL and EDA

Explore at:
zip(8452046 bytes)Available download formats
Dataset updated
Jan 24, 2025
Authors
Carlos Egana
Area covered
San Francisco
Description

Context San Francisco, known for its iconic Golden Gate Bridge, steep hills, and vibrant neighborhoods, has become a hotspot for travelers seeking unique stays and authentic local experiences. This dataset provides a detailed snapshot of Airbnb activity in San Francisco, California, offering insights into short-term rental trends, pricing dynamics, and guest reviews.

Content The dataset consists of three key files that capture different aspects of Airbnb activity in San Francisco:

Listings Data (listings.csv.gz): Comprehensive details about Airbnb listings, including descriptions, host information, and average review scores. Calendar Data (calendar.csv.gz): Daily availability and pricing for each listing, ideal for analyzing seasonal trends and price fluctuations. Reviews Data (reviews.csv.gz): Detailed guest reviews, including unique reviewer IDs, comments, and timestamps, offering insights into guest experiences and sentiments. Inspiration This dataset offers numerous opportunities for analysis and exploration:

Neighborhood Vibes: Can you identify the unique character of San Francisco’s neighborhoods based on listing descriptions? Seasonality Trends: When is the best time to visit San Francisco, and how do rental prices change throughout the year? Market Dynamics: Is there evidence of growth in Airbnb activity, such as an increase in new listings or guest reviews? Uncover hidden patterns in San Francisco’s Airbnb market and dive into the data to learn more about this iconic city! 🌉

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu