The number of employees at Goldman Sachs worldwide increased overall from 2009 to 2023, despite fluctuations. There were over 45,000 employees at Goldman Sachs globally in 2023, a notable decrease compared to the previous year.

Goldman Sachs reported 46.5K in Employees for its fiscal year ending in December of 2024. Data for Goldman Sachs | GS - Employees Total Number including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last October in 2025.

The number of employees at Goldman Sachs worldwide showed an overall increasing trend from 2009 to 2024, despite some fluctuations during this period. As of 2024, the global workforce at Goldman Sachs exceeded 46,000 employees, representing a modest increase from the previous year. The bank's employee count reached its highest point in 2022, with approximately 48,500 staff members worldwide.

In fiscal year 2024, the total number of employees at Goldman Sachs Group was 46,500. The employee count increasedby 1,200 from 45,300 (in 2023) to 46,500 (in 2024). It represents a 2.65% year-over-year growth in employee count.

In 2022, the share of female employees at Goldman Sachs in the United States was **** percent, while the share of male employees was **** percent. In 2021, the share of female employees in the total U.S. workforce was slightly lower, at **** percent.

In 2023, approximately ** percent of Goldman Sachs' total U.S. workforce identified as white. The second-largest ethnic group was Asian at ** percent, followed by Hispanic at ***** percent and Black/African American at **** percent. The share of white employees declined compared to previous years, while the representation of Asian and Hispanic employees saw a slight increase. Meanwhile, the share of Black/African American employees experienced a slight decrease.

Goldman Sachs Group's CEO salary and other executives compensation in 2021 was as follows: David Solomon Chairman and CEO at Goldman Sachs Group, received a total compensation of $39.55 M in 2021, John Waldron President and COO at Goldman Sachs Group, received a total compensation of $35.51 M in 2021, Stephen Scherr CFO (Retired) * at Goldman Sachs Group, received a total compensation of $20.37 M in 2021, Philip Berlinski Global Treasurer at Goldman Sachs Group, received a total compensation of $16.97 M in 2021, Kathryn Ruemmler CLO and General Counsel at Goldman Sachs Group, received a total compensation of $12.70 M in 2021.

In 2024, JPMorgan was the world's leading bank in terms of investment banking revenue, generating around 8.1 billion U.S. dollars. In 2024, JPMorgan was also the largest bank in the United States by total assets, followed by Bank of America and City Group. Global investment banking is dominated by U.S. banks The top five investment banks globally were all American multinational firms. In 2024, the two leading investment banks by revenue were JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs. While JPMorgan outpaced Goldman Sachs, both banks reported revenues exceeding six billion U.S. dollars. BofA Securities and Morgan Stanley ranked third and fourth, with revenues of approximately 5.4 billion and 5.2 billion U.S. dollars, respectively. Together, these four banks held nearly a third of the global investment banking market share in terms of revenue in 2024. Investment banking fees Unsurprisingly, JPMorgan was also the leading bank in terms of investment banking fees. These fees represent the returns banks earn for offering investment services, such as facilitating mergers and acquisitions. In 2024, the largest value of investment banking fees came from services provided to the financial sector.

Goldman Sachs Des Employés Nombre total - Les valeurs actuelles, des données historiques, des prévisions, des statistiques, des tableaux et le calendrier économique - Oct 2025.Data for Goldman Sachs | Des Employés | Nombre total including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last October in 2025.

Goldman Sachs Empleados Numero total - Los valores actuales, los datos históricos, las previsiones, estadísticas, gráficas y calendario económico - Oct 2025.Data for Goldman Sachs | Empleados | Numero total including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last October in 2025.

Goldman Sachs Funcionários Número total - Valores atuais, dados históricos, previsões, estatísticas, gráficos e calendário econômico - Sep 2025.Data for Goldman Sachs | Funcionários | Número total including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last September in 2025.

The share of female employees among executive and senior level officials and managers varied on average between ** and ** percent among the largest U.S. banks in 2023. This is a relatively big difference compared to the share of female employees in the total workforce, where the share of women exceeded ** percent at most banks. At **** percent, Wells Fargo had the highest share of female executives and seniors, followed by the Citigroup (***** percent) and Bank of America (** percent). The share of female employees at these levels was the lowest at TD Bank (**** percent) and Goldman Sachs (**** percent).Board diversity at leading banks A board of directors is the governing body of a company that makes key decisions on issues such as dividends, mergers, and the recruitment of senior managers. In case of a public company, the directors are elected by the shareholders. In 2023, diversity on the board of directors at the leading U.S. banks was slightly higher than at the executive and senior levels, although only Citigroup had more female directors than male ones. What is the world's leading company for gender equality? Gender equality has been in the spotlight for many years, and companies around the world attempt to address issues related to gender equality in various ways. The most common ways are to increase gender balance in the total workforce and on the board of directors, decrease gender pay gaps, and to introduce efficient policies on parental leave and sexual harassment. Based on these and other criteria, the world's leading public company for gender equality in 2022 was an Australian real estate company, called Mirvac.

In 2023, the share of female employees in the total workforce of most leading U.S. banks exceeded 50 percent. Among the observed banks, Truist and PNC Financial Services had the highest share of female employees in terms of the total workforce, at 62.7 and 59 percent, respectively. The lowest share of female employees was seen at Capital One and Goldman Sachs, where the share of women was less than 50 percent.Gender diversity: total workforce vs. senior management The relatively high share of female employees in the total workforce of leading U.S. banks may show gender diversity in a good light, but the devil is in the details. The share of female executives and senior level officials and managers in the largest U.S. banks was significantly lower in 2023. The relatively low share of female executives and senior managers in banks is not unique. In numerous other industries, the share of women employed on executive and senior levels tends to be lower than the share of women in the total workforce. Global gender gap index There has been a gradually increasing focus on gender equality in recent years. The global gender gap index was first introduced by the World Economic Forum in 2006 to measure the gender-based gaps among four key dimensions (economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment), and to track the progress of closing these gaps. Based on the four dimensions, the index scores each country between 0 and 1. In 2023, Europe held seven spots in the top ten, while the United States ranked 43rd.

Companies in the Investment Banking industry provide financial advisory services, offering their insight on IPOs, M&As and equity and debt security underwriting activity. Competition has been fierce in recent years, with a flood of boutique firms entering the industry as bankers look for healthier rewards than those offered by the more regulated larger investment banks. Growing M&A and IPO activity before 2022-23 ramped up demand for investment banking services, although this momentum lost speed in 2022-23 as access to cheap capital ended. Revenue is expected to contract at a compound annual rate of 8.1% over the five years through 2025-26 to £8 billion, including an expected drop of 0.5% in 2025-26. Profit is also expected to edge downwards in 2025, though it remains high. Capital market activity surged at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, lifting demand for investment banking services as governments and large international businesses across the world raised capital to fund fiscal stimuli and maintain cash flow levels. The boom in debt and equity markets showed no sign of slowing the next year, with IPO and M&A activity reaching record levels in 2021-22, driving demand for investment bankers’ services. However, in the two years through 2023-24, M&A activity plummeted thanks to rising interest rates, mounting geopolitical tensions and a gloomy economic outlook, which put companies off from seeking takeovers. In 2024-25, M&A activity fared better than IPOs, welcoming improvements in consumer confidence amid interest rate cuts, aiding revenue growth. However, IPOs continued on their downward trajectory as geopolitical uncertainty and high interest rates resulted in many companies delaying listings. Over 2025-26, M&A activity is forecast to continue to climb, but IPO activity may stall as Trump's tariff announcements erode investor sentiment, weighing on revenue growth. Revenue is anticipated to grow at a compound annual rate of 4.5% over the five years through 2030-31 to £10 billion. Deal activity is set to build as lower interest rates make leveraged transactions more attractive. Competition will remain fierce, driving technological innovation as investment banks try to improve decision-making processes and scale operations through the use of AI. Still, strong competition from overseas exchanges, like the S&P 500 in the US, will dent UK IPO activity in the coming years as companies move away from UK listings and the lacklustre valuations they offer, weighing on revenue growth.

The share of female employees among executive and senior level officials and managers varied on average between 26 and 42 percent among the largest U.S. banks in 2023. This is a relatively big difference compared to the share of female employees in the total workforce, where the share of women exceeded 50 percent at most banks. At 41.9 percent, Wells Fargo had the highest share of female executives and seniors, followed by the Citigroup (41.74 percent) and Bank of America (39 percent). The share of female employees at these levels was the lowest at TD Bank (27.1 percent) and Goldman Sachs (25.9 percent).Board diversity at leading banks A board of directors is the governing body of a company that makes key decisions on issues such as dividends, mergers, and the recruitment of senior managers. In case of a public company, the directors are elected by the shareholders. In 2023, diversity on the board of directors at the leading U.S. banks was slightly higher than at the executive and senior levels, although only Citigroup had more female directors than male ones. What is the world's leading company for gender equality? Gender equality has been in the spotlight for many years, and companies around the world attempt to address issues related to gender equality in various ways. The most common ways are to increase gender balance in the total workforce and on the board of directors, decrease gender pay gaps, and to introduce efficient policies on parental leave and sexual harassment. Based on these and other criteria, the world's leading public company for gender equality in 2022 was an Australian real estate company, called Mirvac.

In 2023, the share of female employees in the total workforce of most leading U.S. banks exceeded ** percent. Among the observed banks, Truist and PNC Financial Services had the highest share of female employees in terms of the total workforce, at **** and ** percent, respectively. The lowest share of female employees was seen at Capital One and Goldman Sachs, where the share of women was less than ** percent.Gender diversity: total workforce vs. senior management The relatively high share of female employees in the total workforce of leading U.S. banks may show gender diversity in a good light, but the devil is in the details. The share of female executives and senior level officials and managers in the largest U.S. banks was significantly lower in 2023. The relatively low share of female executives and senior managers in banks is not unique. In numerous other industries, the share of women employed on executive and senior levels tends to be lower than the share of women in the total workforce. Global gender gap index There has been a gradually increasing focus on gender equality in recent years. The global gender gap index was first introduced by the World Economic Forum in 2006 to measure the gender-based gaps among four key dimensions (economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, health and survival, and political empowerment), and to track the progress of closing these gaps. Based on the four dimensions, the index scores each country between * and *. In 2023, Europe held ***** spots in the top ten, while the United States ranked ****.

Goldman Sachs Karyawan Jumlah Total - Nilai saat ini, data historis, perkiraan, statistik, grafik dan kalender ekonomi - Sep 2025.Data for Goldman Sachs | Karyawan | Jumlah Total including historical, tables and charts were last updated by Trading Economics this last September in 2025.

This data collection consists of transcripts from 12 focus group discussions on themes related to social equality in Russia. The focus group discussions were conducted by the Institute of Applied Politics in Moscow, directed by Dr Kryshtanovskaya; using a discussion guide written by the Investigators. They were held in 12 cities chosen to represent different regions of the country, with an emphasis on provincial cities: Ufa, Kaliningrad, Ekaterinburg, Tiumen, Saratov, Ulyanovsk, Volgograd, Ivanovo, Irkutsk, Obolensk, Vladivostok and Protvino. The respondents included a mix of ages, genders, blue and white collar workers. The focus groups in Protvino and Ulyanovsk were held only for respondents age 18-29. The focus group discussions dealt with household and national economic change, perceptions of social fairness, and welfare values. Specifically, respondents were asked about the state of the national and local economies, their household economy, how they define rich and poor people and how they position themselves in relation to these categories. They were asked about whether they perceived differences in wealth between individuals, regions and between urban and rural areas as fair, and whether such differences are increasing or decreasing. Finally they were asked about whether the rich should take more responsibility for the welfare of the poor, about their own personal responsibility and that of the state and businesses, as well as about progressive income taxes and the degree to which the state should control the economy. The discussion guide is provided in Russian and English. Basic information about the respondents, including gender, age, and occupation are provided at the top of each focus group transcript. Each participant is identified by their given name only. The transcripts are provided in Russian. The Russian text was transcribed by the Institute of Applied Politics from audio files. A parallel set of focus groups was conducted in China and are available as the collection Social equality forum China: Focus group transcripts (see Related Resources). Taken together, Russia and China account for 41 per cent of the total territory of the BRICs and 63 per cent of their GDP/PPP. On Goldman Sachs projections China will be the world’s largest economy by 2050, and Russia its sixth largest. The project will seek to examine the following propositions: (1) that these two BRIC countries are becoming increasingly unequal; (2) that within them, political power and economic advantage are increasingly closely associated; (3) that their political systems have increasingly been employed to ensure that no effective challenge can be mounted to that combination of government position and economic advantage; (4) that set against a broader comparative perspective, an increasingly unequal society in which government is effectively immune from conventional challenge is likely to become increasingly regressive, or unstable, or both. Evidence will be drawn from official statistics, interviews with policy specialists and government officials, two dozen focus groups, and an analysis of the composition of the management boards of the largest companies in both countries. A final part of the analysis will employ crossnational evidence to test a series of hypotheses relating to the association between inequality and political instability on a more broadly comparative basis. Focus group discussions held in 12 Russian cities with 6 participants each drawn from a range of ages, both genders and different professions. Two focus groups were held for respondents age 18-29 only.

In 2023, 43.51 percent of the workforce in India were employed in agriculture, while the other half was almost evenly distributed among the two other sectors, industry and services. While the share of Indians working in agriculture is declining, it is still the main sector of employment. A BRIC powerhouseTogether with Brazil, Russia, and China, India makes up the four so-called BRIC countries. They are the four fastest-growing emerging countries dubbed BRIC, an acronym, by Jim O’Neill at Goldman Sachs. Being major economies themselves already, these four countries are said to be at a similar economic developmental stage -- on the verge of becoming industrialized countries -- and maybe even dominating the global economy. Together, they are already larger than the rest of the world when it comes to GDP and simple population figures. Among these four, India is ranked second across almost all key indicators, right behind China. Services on the riseWhile most of the Indian workforce is still employed in the agricultural sector, it is the services sector that generates most of the country’s GDP. In fact, when looking at GDP distribution across economic sectors, agriculture lags behind with a mere 15 percent contribution. Some of the leading services industries are telecommunications, software, textiles, and chemicals, and production only seems to increase – currently, the GDP in India is growing, as is employment.