The statistic depicts the causes of poor data quality for enterprises in North America, according to a survey of North American IT executives conducted by 451 Research in 2015. As of 2015, 47 percent of respondents indicated that poor data quality at their company was attributable to data migration or conversion projects.

Learn more about Market Research Intellect's Data Quality Management Software Market Report, valued at USD 3.5 billion in 2024, and set to grow to USD 8.1 billion by 2033 with a CAGR of 12.8% (2026-2033).

Research Ship Roger Revelle Underway Meteorological Data (delayed ~10 days for quality control) are from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) program. IMPORTANT: ALWAYS USE THE QUALITY FLAG DATA! Each data variable's metadata includes a qcindex attribute which indicates a character number in the flag data. ALWAYS check the flag data for each row of data to see which data is good (flag='Z') and which data isn't. For example, to extract just data where time (qcindex=1), latitude (qcindex=2), longitude (qcindex=3), and airTemperature (qcindex=12) are 'good' data, include this constraint in your ERDDAP query: flag=~"ZZZ........Z." in your query. '=~' indicates this is a regular expression constraint. The 'Z's are literal characters. In this dataset, 'Z' indicates 'good' data. The '.'s say to match any character. The '' says to match the previous character 0 or more times. (Don't include backslashes in your query.) See the tutorial for regular expressions at https://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaRegularExpressions/article.html

The data quality tools market mainly consists of systems and programs under which the quality and reliability of data on various sources and structures can be achieved. They offer functionalities such as data subsetting, data cleaning, data de-duplication, and data validation, which are useful in assessing and rectifying the quality of data in organizations. Key business activity areas include data integration, migration, and governance, with decision-making, analytics, and compliance being viewed as major use cases. prominent sectors include finance, health, and social care, retail and wholesale, manufacturing, and construction. Market issues include the attempt to apply machine learning or artificial intelligence for better data quality, the attempt to apply cloud solutions for scalability and availability, and the need to be concerned with data privacy and regulations. Its employ has been subject to more focus given its criticality in business these days in addition to the increasing market need for enhancing data quality. Key drivers for this market are: Increased Digitization and High Adoption of Automation to Propel Market Growth. Potential restraints include: Privacy and Security Issues to Hamper Market Growth. Notable trends are: Growing Implementation of Touch-based and Voice-based Infotainment Systems to Increase Adoption of Intelligent Cars.

The statistic shows the problems caused by poor quality data for enterprises in North America, according to a survey of North American IT executives conducted by 451 Research in 2015. As of 2015, 44 percent of respondents indicated that having poor quality data can result in extra costs for the business.

The Data Quality Tools Market size is expected to reach a valuation of USD 9.77 billion in 2033 growing at a CAGR of 16.20%. The Data Quality Tools market research report classifies market by share, trend, demand, forecast and based on segmentation.

The Data Quality Software and Solutions market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing volume and complexity of data generated by businesses across all sectors. The market's expansion is fueled by a rising demand for accurate, consistent, and reliable data for informed decision-making, improved operational efficiency, and regulatory compliance. Key drivers include the surge in big data adoption, the growing need for data integration and governance, and the increasing prevalence of cloud-based solutions offering scalable and cost-effective data quality management capabilities. Furthermore, the rising adoption of advanced analytics and artificial intelligence (AI) is enhancing data quality capabilities, leading to more sophisticated solutions that can automate data cleansing, validation, and profiling processes. We estimate the 2025 market size to be around $12 billion, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10% over the forecast period (2025-2033). This growth trajectory is being influenced by the rapid digital transformation across industries, necessitating higher data quality standards. Segmentation reveals a strong preference for cloud-based solutions due to their flexibility and scalability, with large enterprises driving a significant portion of the market demand. However, market growth faces some restraints. High implementation costs associated with data quality software and solutions, particularly for large-scale deployments, can be a barrier to entry for some businesses, especially SMEs. Also, the complexity of integrating these solutions with existing IT infrastructure can present challenges. The lack of skilled professionals proficient in data quality management is another factor impacting market growth. Despite these challenges, the market is expected to maintain a healthy growth trajectory, driven by increasing awareness of the value of high-quality data, coupled with the availability of innovative and user-friendly solutions. The competitive landscape is characterized by established players such as Informatica, IBM, and SAP, along with emerging players offering specialized solutions, resulting in a diverse range of options for businesses. Regional analysis indicates that North America and Europe currently hold significant market shares, but the Asia-Pacific region is projected to witness substantial growth in the coming years due to rapid digitalization and increasing data volumes.

Research Ship Robert Gordon Sproul Underway Meteorological Data (delayed ~10 days for quality control) are from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) program. IMPORTANT: ALWAYS USE THE QUALITY FLAG DATA! Each data variable's metadata includes a qcindex attribute which indicates a character number in the flag data. ALWAYS check the flag data for each row of data to see which data is good (flag='Z') and which data isn't. For example, to extract just data where time (qcindex=1), latitude (qcindex=2), longitude (qcindex=3), and airTemperature (qcindex=12) are 'good' data, include this constraint in your ERDDAP query: flag=~"ZZZ........Z." in your query. '=~' indicates this is a regular expression constraint. The 'Z's are literal characters. In this dataset, 'Z' indicates 'good' data. The '.'s say to match any character. The '' says to match the previous character 0 or more times. (Don't include backslashes in your query.) See the tutorial for regular expressions at https://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaRegularExpressions/article.html

This is a hands-on workshop on the management of qualitative social science data, with a focus on data sharing and transparency. While the workshop addresses data management throughout the lifecycle – from data management plan to data sharing – its focus is on the particular challenges in sharing qualitative data and in making qualitative research transparent. One set of challenges concerns the ethical and legal concerns in sharing qualitative data. We will consider obtaining permissions for sharing qualitative data from human participants, strategies for (and limits of) de-identifying qualitative data, and options for restricting access to sensitive qualitative data. We will also briefly look at copyright and licensing and how they can inhibit the public sharing of qualitative data.

A second set of challenges concerns the lack of standardized guidelines for making qualitative research processes transparent. Following on some of the themes touched on in the talk, we will jointly explore some cutting edge approaches for making qualitative research transparent and discuss their potentials as well as shortcomings for different forms of research.

The statistic depicts the means of managing data quality among enterprises in North America, according to a survey of North American IT executives conducted by 451 Research in 2015. As of 2015, 53 percent of respondents indicated that their company uses a data quality management (DQM) cloud service to manage their data quality.

Market Analysis: Data Quality Management Software The global data quality management software market is projected to reach $X million by 2033, expanding at a CAGR of XX% over the forecast period. Key drivers for this growth include the increasing demand for high-quality data in various industries, the need for compliance with data privacy regulations, and the adoption of cloud-based data quality solutions. Cloud-based offerings provide cost-effectiveness, scalability, and easy access to data quality tools. Large enterprises and small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs) are significant end-users, driving market expansion. Market Segmentation and Key Players: The market is segmented by application into SMEs and large enterprises, and by type into on-premises and cloud-based solutions. Major players in the industry include IBM, Informatica, Oracle, SAP, and SAS. Other prominent vendors like Precisely, Talend, and Experian also hold a significant market share. Strategic partnerships, acquisitions, and continuous product innovation are common industry trends that enhance data quality capabilities and drive market growth. Regional analysis indicates that North America and Europe are the key markets, with the Asia Pacific region emerging as a potential growth area due to increasing awareness and data privacy initiatives.

Research Ship Knorr Underway Meteorological Data (delayed ~10 days for quality control) are from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) program. IMPORTANT: ALWAYS USE THE QUALITY FLAG DATA! Each data variable's metadata includes a qcindex attribute which indicates a character number in the flag data. ALWAYS check the flag data for each row of data to see which data is good (flag='Z') and which data isn't. For example, to extract just data where time (qcindex=1), latitude (qcindex=2), longitude (qcindex=3), and airTemperature (qcindex=12) are 'good' data, include this constraint in your ERDDAP query: flag=~"ZZZ........Z." in your query. '=~' indicates this is a regular expression constraint. The 'Z's are literal characters. In this dataset, 'Z' indicates 'good' data. The '.'s say to match any character. The '' says to match the previous character 0 or more times. (Don't include backslashes in your query.) See the tutorial for regular expressions at https://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaRegularExpressions/article.html

Empirical academic journal articles that used data from at least one wave of the European Values Survey and was published at least in pre-print form between 1984 and 2013.

Political scientists routinely face the challenge of assessing the quality (validity and reliability) of measures in order to use them in substantive research. While stand-alone assessment tools exist, researchers rarely combine them comprehensively. Further, while a large literature informs data producers, data consumers lack guidance on how to assess existing measures for use in substantive research. We delineate a three-component practical approach to data quality assessment that integrates complementary multi-method tools to assess: 1) content validity; 2) the validity and reliability of the data generation process; and 3) convergent validity. We apply our quality assessment approach to the corruption measures from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) project, both illustrating our rubric and unearthing several quality advantages and disadvantages of the V-Dem measures, compared to other existing measures of corruption.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Data Quality Software market size will be USD XX million in 2025. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of XX% from 2025 to 2031.

North America held the major market share for more than XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Europe accounted for a market share of over XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Asia Pacific held a market share of around XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Latin America had a market share of more than XX% of the global revenue with a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. Middle East and Africa had a market share of around XX% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD XX million in 2025 and will grow at a CAGR of XX% from 2025 to 2031. KEY DRIVERS of

Data Quality Software

The Emergence of Big Data and IoT drives the Market

The rise of big data analytics and Internet of Things (IoT) applications has significantly increased the volume and complexity of data that businesses need to manage. As more connected devices generate real-time data, the amount of information businesses handle grows exponentially. This surge in data requires organizations to ensure its accuracy, consistency, and relevance to prevent decision-making errors. For instance, in industries like healthcare, where real-time data from medical devices and patient monitoring systems is used for diagnostics and treatment decisions, inaccurate data can lead to critical errors. To address these challenges, organizations are increasingly investing in data quality software to manage large volumes of data from various sources. Companies like GE Healthcare use data quality software to ensure the integrity of data from connected medical devices, allowing for more accurate patient care and operational efficiency. The demand for these tools continues to rise as businesses realize the importance of maintaining clean, consistent, and reliable data for effective big data analytics and IoT applications. With the growing adoption of digital transformation strategies and the integration of advanced technologies, organizations are generating vast amounts of structured and unstructured data across various sectors. For instance, in the retail sector, companies are collecting data from customer interactions, online transactions, and social media channels. If not properly managed, this data can lead to inaccuracies, inconsistencies, and unreliable insights that can adversely affect decision-making. The proliferation of data highlights the need for robust data quality solutions to profile, cleanse, and validate data, ensuring its integrity and usability. Companies like Walmart and Amazon rely heavily on data quality software to manage vast datasets for personalized marketing, inventory management, and customer satisfaction. Without proper data management, these businesses risk making decisions based on faulty data, potentially leading to lost revenue or customer dissatisfaction. The increasing volumes of data and the need to ensure high-quality, reliable data across organizations are significant drivers behind the rising demand for data quality software, as it enables companies to stay competitive and make informed decisions.

Key Restraints to

Data Quality Software

Lack of Skilled Personnel and High Implementation Costs Hinders the market growth

The effective use of data quality software requires expertise in areas like data profiling, cleansing, standardization, and validation, as well as a deep understanding of the specific business needs and regulatory requirements. Unfortunately, many organizations struggle to find personnel with the right skill set, which limits their ability to implement and maximize the potential of these tools. For instance, in industries like finance or healthcare, where data quality is crucial for compliance and decision-making, the lack of skilled personnel can lead to inefficiencies in managing data and missed opportunities for improvement. In turn, organizations may fail to extract the full value from their data quality investments, resulting in poor data outcomes and suboptimal decision-ma...

Research Ship T. G. Thompson Underway Meteorological Data (delayed ~10 days for quality control) are from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) program.

IMPORTANT: ALWAYS USE THE QUALITY FLAG DATA! Each data variable's metadata includes a qcindex attribute which indicates a character number in the flag data. ALWAYS check the flag data for each row of data to see which data is good (flag='Z') and which data isn't. For example, to extract just data where time (qcindex=1), latitude (qcindex=2), longitude (qcindex=3), and airTemperature (qcindex=12) are 'good' data, include this constraint in your ERDDAP query: flag=~"ZZZ........Z.*" in your query. '=~' indicates this is a regular expression constraint. The 'Z's are literal characters. In this dataset, 'Z' indicates 'good' data. The '.'s say to match any character. The '*' says to match the previous character 0 or more times. (Don't include backslashes in your query.) See the tutorial for regular expressions at https://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaRegularExpressions/article.html

Research Ship Oceanus Underway Meteorological Data (delayed ~10 days for quality control) are from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) program.

IMPORTANT: ALWAYS USE THE QUALITY FLAG DATA! Each data variable's metadata includes a qcindex attribute which indicates a character number in the flag data. ALWAYS check the flag data for each row of data to see which data is good (flag='Z') and which data isn't. For example, to extract just data where time (qcindex=1), latitude (qcindex=2), longitude (qcindex=3), and airTemperature (qcindex=12) are 'good' data, include this constraint in your ERDDAP query: flag=~"ZZZ........Z.*" in your query. '=~' indicates this is a regular expression constraint. The 'Z's are literal characters. In this dataset, 'Z' indicates 'good' data. The '.'s say to match any character. The '*' says to match the previous character 0 or more times. (Don't include backslashes in your query.) See the tutorial for regular expressions at http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaRegularExpressions/article.html

Research Ship Tangaroa Underway Meteorological Data (delayed ~10 days for quality control) are from the Shipboard Automated Meteorological and Oceanographic System (SAMOS) program.

IMPORTANT: ALWAYS USE THE QUALITY FLAG DATA! Each data variable's metadata includes a qcindex attribute which indicates a character number in the flag data. ALWAYS check the flag data for each row of data to see which data is good (flag='Z') and which data isn't. For example, to extract just data where time (qcindex=1), latitude (qcindex=2), longitude (qcindex=3), and airTemperature (qcindex=12) are 'good' data, include this constraint in your ERDDAP query: flag=~"ZZZ........Z.*" in your query. '=~' indicates this is a regular expression constraint. The 'Z's are literal characters. In this dataset, 'Z' indicates 'good' data. The '.'s say to match any character. The '*' says to match the previous character 0 or more times. (Don't include backslashes in your query.) See the tutorial for regular expressions at http://www.vogella.com/tutorials/JavaRegularExpressions/article.html

This dataset is the result of an online survey the authors conducted in the German agricultural science community in 2020. The survey inquires not only about the status quo, but also explicitly about the wishes and needs of users, representing the agricultural scientific research domain, of the in-progress NFDI (national research data infrastructure). Questions cover information about produced and (re-)used data, data quality aspects, information about the use of standards, publication practices and legal aspects of agricultural research data, the current situation in research data management in regards to awareness, consulting and curricula as well as needs of the agricultural community in respect to future developments. In total, the questionnaire contained 52 questions and was conducted using the Community Edition of the Open Source Survey Tool LimeSurvey (Version 3.19.3; LimeSurvey GmbH). The questions were accessible in English and German. The first set of questions (Questions 1-4) addressed the respondent’s professional background (i.e. career status, affiliation and subject area, but no personal data) and the user group. The user groups included data users, data providers as well as infrastructure service and information service providers. Subsequent questions were partly user group specific. All questions, the corresponding question types and addressed user groups can be found in the questionnaire files (Survey-Questions-2020-DE.pdf German Version; Survey-Questions-2020-EN.pdf English Version). The survey was accessible online between June 26th and July 21st 2020, could be completed anonymously and took about 20 minutes. The survey was promoted in an undirected manner via mail lists of agricultural institutes and agricultural-specific professional societies in Germany, via social media (e.g. Twitter) and announced during the first community workshop of NFDI4Agri on July 15th 2020 and other scientific events. After closing the survey, we exported the data from the LimeSurvey tool and initially screened it. We considered all questionnaires that contained at least one answered question in addition to the respondent’s professional background information (Questions 1-4). In total, we received 196 questionnaires of which 160 were completed in full (although not always every answer option was used, empty cells are filled with “N/A”). The main data set contains all standardized answers from the respondents. For anonymization, respondents’ individual answers, for instance, free text answers, comments and details in the category "other” were removed from the main data set. The main data set only lists whether such information was provided (“Yes”) or not (“No” or “N/A”). In an additional file respondents’ individual answers of the questions 4-52 are listed alphabetically, so that it is not possible to trace the data back. In the rare cases where only one person has provided such individual information in an answer, it is traceable but does not contain any sensitive data. The main data set containing answers of the 196 questionnaires received can be found in the file Survey-2020-Main-DataSet-Answers.xlsx. The subsidary data set containing the respondents’ individual answers (most answers are in German and are not translated) of the questions 4-52, for instance, free text answers, comments and details in the category "other” (alphabetically listed) can be found in Survey-2020-Subsidary-DataSet-Free_Text_Answers.xlsx.