You can check the fields description in the documentation: current Full database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/full/?bash; Historical Full database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/history/full/?bash.
Full Google Database is a combination of the Advanced Google SERP Database and Google Keyword Database.
Google SERP Database offers millions of SERPs collected in 67 regions with most of Google’s advanced SERP features, including featured snippets, knowledge graphs, people also ask sections, top stories, and more.
Google Keyword Database encompasses billions of search terms enriched with related Google Ads data: search volume trends, CPC, competition, and more.
This database is available in JSON format only.
You don’t have to download fresh data dumps in JSON – we can deliver data straight to your storage or database. We send terrabytes of data to dozens of customers every month using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, Eleasticsearch, and Google Big Query. Let us know if you’d like to get your data to any other storage or database.
You can check the fields description in the documentation: current Keyword database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/keywords/?bash; Historical Keyword database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/history/keywords/?bash. You don’t have to download fresh data dumps in JSON or CSV – we can deliver data straight to your storage or database. We send terrabytes of data to dozens of customers every month using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, Eleasticsearch, and Google Big Query. Let us know if you’d like to get your data to any other storage or database.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google searches of sensitive terms
OpenWeb Ninja's Google Images Data (Google SERP Data) API provides real-time image search capabilities for images sourced from all public sources on the web.
The API enables you to search and access more than 100 billion images from across the web including advanced filtering capabilities as supported by Google Advanced Image Search. The API provides Google Images Data (Google SERP Data) including details such as image URL, title, size information, thumbnail, source information, and more data points. The API supports advanced filtering and options such as file type, image color, usage rights, creation time, and more. In addition, any Advanced Google Search operators can be used with the API.
OpenWeb Ninja's Google Images Data & Google SERP Data API common use cases:
Creative Media Production: Enhance digital content with a vast array of real-time images, ensuring engaging and brand-aligned visuals for blogs, social media, and advertising.
AI Model Enhancement: Train and refine AI models with diverse, annotated images, improving object recognition and image classification accuracy.
Trend Analysis: Identify emerging market trends and consumer preferences through real-time visual data, enabling proactive business decisions.
Innovative Product Design: Inspire product innovation by exploring current design trends and competitor products, ensuring market-relevant offerings.
Advanced Search Optimization: Improve search engines and applications with enriched image datasets, providing users with accurate, relevant, and visually appealing search results.
OpenWeb Ninja's Annotated Imagery Data & Google SERP Data Stats & Capabilities:
100B+ Images: Access an extensive database of over 100 billion images.
Images Data from all Public Sources (Google SERP Data): Benefit from a comprehensive aggregation of image data from various public websites, ensuring a wide range of sources and perspectives.
Extensive Search and Filtering Capabilities: Utilize advanced search operators and filters to refine image searches by file type, color, usage rights, creation time, and more, making it easy to find exactly what you need.
Rich Data Points: Each image comes with more than 10 data points, including URL, title (annotation), size information, thumbnail, and source information, providing a detailed context for each image.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Georgia Google Search Trends: Government Measures: Government Subsidy data was reported at 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Georgia Google Search Trends: Government Measures: Government Subsidy data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 38.000 Score in 02 Jul 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 May 2025. Georgia Google Search Trends: Government Measures: Government Subsidy data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Georgia – Table GE.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Business Listings Database is the source of point-of-interest data and can provide you with all the information you need to analyze how specific places are used, what kinds of audiences they attract, and how their visitor profile changes over time.
The full fields description may be found on this page: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/business_listings/?bash
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Algeria Google Search Trends: Online Movie: YouTube data was reported at 80.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 79.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Algeria Google Search Trends: Online Movie: YouTube data is updated daily, averaging 71.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 07 Feb 2025 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 22 Jun 2023. Algeria Google Search Trends: Online Movie: YouTube data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Algeria – Table DZ.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
United States agricultural researchers have many options for making their data available online. This dataset aggregates the primary sources of ag-related data and determines where researchers are likely to deposit their agricultural data. These data serve as both a current landscape analysis and also as a baseline for future studies of ag research data. Purpose As sources of agricultural data become more numerous and disparate, and collaboration and open data become more expected if not required, this research provides a landscape inventory of online sources of open agricultural data. An inventory of current agricultural data sharing options will help assess how the Ag Data Commons, a platform for USDA-funded data cataloging and publication, can best support data-intensive and multi-disciplinary research. It will also help agricultural librarians assist their researchers in data management and publication. The goals of this study were to establish where agricultural researchers in the United States-- land grant and USDA researchers, primarily ARS, NRCS, USFS and other agencies -- currently publish their data, including general research data repositories, domain-specific databases, and the top journals compare how much data is in institutional vs. domain-specific vs. federal platforms determine which repositories are recommended by top journals that require or recommend the publication of supporting data ascertain where researchers not affiliated with funding or initiatives possessing a designated open data repository can publish data Approach The National Agricultural Library team focused on Agricultural Research Service (ARS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), and United States Forest Service (USFS) style research data, rather than ag economics, statistics, and social sciences data. To find domain-specific, general, institutional, and federal agency repositories and databases that are open to US research submissions and have some amount of ag data, resources including re3data, libguides, and ARS lists were analysed. Primarily environmental or public health databases were not included, but places where ag grantees would publish data were considered. Search methods We first compiled a list of known domain specific USDA / ARS datasets / databases that are represented in the Ag Data Commons, including ARS Image Gallery, ARS Nutrition Databases (sub-components), SoyBase, PeanutBase, National Fungus Collection, i5K Workspace @ NAL, and GRIN. We then searched using search engines such as Bing and Google for non-USDA / federal ag databases, using Boolean variations of “agricultural data” /“ag data” / “scientific data” + NOT + USDA (to filter out the federal / USDA results). Most of these results were domain specific, though some contained a mix of data subjects. We then used search engines such as Bing and Google to find top agricultural university repositories using variations of “agriculture”, “ag data” and “university” to find schools with agriculture programs. Using that list of universities, we searched each university web site to see if their institution had a repository for their unique, independent research data if not apparent in the initial web browser search. We found both ag specific university repositories and general university repositories that housed a portion of agricultural data. Ag specific university repositories are included in the list of domain-specific repositories. Results included Columbia University – International Research Institute for Climate and Society, UC Davis – Cover Crops Database, etc. If a general university repository existed, we determined whether that repository could filter to include only data results after our chosen ag search terms were applied. General university databases that contain ag data included Colorado State University Digital Collections, University of Michigan ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research), and University of Minnesota DRUM (Digital Repository of the University of Minnesota). We then split out NCBI (National Center for Biotechnology Information) repositories. Next we searched the internet for open general data repositories using a variety of search engines, and repositories containing a mix of data, journals, books, and other types of records were tested to determine whether that repository could filter for data results after search terms were applied. General subject data repositories include Figshare, Open Science Framework, PANGEA, Protein Data Bank, and Zenodo. Finally, we compared scholarly journal suggestions for data repositories against our list to fill in any missing repositories that might contain agricultural data. Extensive lists of journals were compiled, in which USDA published in 2012 and 2016, combining search results in ARIS, Scopus, and the Forest Service's TreeSearch, plus the USDA web sites Economic Research Service (ERS), National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Natural Resources and Conservation Service (NRCS), Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Rural Development (RD), and Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS). The top 50 journals' author instructions were consulted to see if they (a) ask or require submitters to provide supplemental data, or (b) require submitters to submit data to open repositories. Data are provided for Journals based on a 2012 and 2016 study of where USDA employees publish their research studies, ranked by number of articles, including 2015/2016 Impact Factor, Author guidelines, Supplemental Data?, Supplemental Data reviewed?, Open Data (Supplemental or in Repository) Required? and Recommended data repositories, as provided in the online author guidelines for each the top 50 journals. Evaluation We ran a series of searches on all resulting general subject databases with the designated search terms. From the results, we noted the total number of datasets in the repository, type of resource searched (datasets, data, images, components, etc.), percentage of the total database that each term comprised, any dataset with a search term that comprised at least 1% and 5% of the total collection, and any search term that returned greater than 100 and greater than 500 results. We compared domain-specific databases and repositories based on parent organization, type of institution, and whether data submissions were dependent on conditions such as funding or affiliation of some kind. Results A summary of the major findings from our data review: Over half of the top 50 ag-related journals from our profile require or encourage open data for their published authors. There are few general repositories that are both large AND contain a significant portion of ag data in their collection. GBIF (Global Biodiversity Information Facility), ICPSR, and ORNL DAAC were among those that had over 500 datasets returned with at least one ag search term and had that result comprise at least 5% of the total collection. Not even one quarter of the domain-specific repositories and datasets reviewed allow open submission by any researcher regardless of funding or affiliation. See included README file for descriptions of each individual data file in this dataset. Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Journals. File Name: Journals.csvResource Title: Journals - Recommended repositories. File Name: Repos_from_journals.csvResource Title: TDWG presentation. File Name: TDWG_Presentation.pptxResource Title: Domain Specific ag data sources. File Name: domain_specific_ag_databases.csvResource Title: Data Dictionary for Ag Data Repository Inventory. File Name: Ag_Data_Repo_DD.csvResource Title: General repositories containing ag data. File Name: general_repos_1.csvResource Title: README and file inventory. File Name: README_InventoryPublicDBandREepAgData.txt
You can check the fields description in the documentation: regular SERP: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/serp_regular/?bash; Advanced SERP: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/serp_advanced/?bash; Historical SERP: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/history/serp_advanced/?bash You don’t have to download fresh data dumps in JSON or CSV – we can deliver data straight to your storage or database. We send terrabytes of data to dozens of customers every month using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, Eleasticsearch, and Google Big Query. Let us know if you’d like to get your data to any other storage or database.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data was reported at 8.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 8.000 Score for 13 May 2025. China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 70.000 Score in 22 Jan 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 02 May 2025. China Google Search Trends: Online Shopping: Tmall data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s China – Table CN.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Patents Research Data contains the output of much of the data analysis work used in Google Patents (patents.google.com), including machine translations of titles and abstracts from Google Translate, embedding vectors, extracted top terms, similar documents, and forward references.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Typical characteristics of academic citation databases and search engines.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Jobs Searching: LinkedIn data was reported at 81.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 85.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Jobs Searching: LinkedIn data is updated daily, averaging 70.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 168.000 Score in 12 Mar 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 27 Feb 2023. Google Search Trends: Jobs Searching: LinkedIn data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s France – Table FR.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Are you looking to identify B2B leads to promote your business, product, or service? Outscraper Google Maps Scraper might just be the tool you've been searching for. This powerful software enables you to extract business data directly from Google's extensive database, which spans millions of businesses across countless industries worldwide.
Outscraper Google Maps Scraper is a tool built with advanced technology that lets you scrape a myriad of valuable information about businesses from Google's database. This information includes but is not limited to, business names, addresses, contact information, website URLs, reviews, ratings, and operational hours.
Whether you are a small business trying to make a mark or a large enterprise exploring new territories, the data obtained from the Outscraper Google Maps Scraper can be a treasure trove. This tool provides a cost-effective, efficient, and accurate method to generate leads and gather market insights.
By using Outscraper, you'll gain a significant competitive edge as it allows you to analyze your market and find potential B2B leads with precision. You can use this data to understand your competitors' landscape, discover new markets, or enhance your customer database. The tool offers the flexibility to extract data based on specific parameters like business category or geographic location, helping you to target the most relevant leads for your business.
In a world that's growing increasingly data-driven, utilizing a tool like Outscraper Google Maps Scraper could be instrumental to your business' success. If you're looking to get ahead in your market and find B2B leads in a more efficient and precise manner, Outscraper is worth considering. It streamlines the data collection process, allowing you to focus on what truly matters – using the data to grow your business.
https://outscraper.com/google-maps-scraper/
As a result of the Google Maps scraping, your data file will contain the following details:
Query Name Site Type Subtypes Category Phone Full Address Borough Street City Postal Code State Us State Country Country Code Latitude Longitude Time Zone Plus Code Rating Reviews Reviews Link Reviews Per Scores Photos Count Photo Street View Working Hours Working Hours Old Format Popular Times Business Status About Range Posts Verified Owner ID Owner Title Owner Link Reservation Links Booking Appointment Link Menu Link Order Links Location Link Place ID Google ID Reviews ID
If you want to enrich your datasets with social media accounts and many more details you could combine Google Maps Scraper with Domain Contact Scraper.
Domain Contact Scraper can scrape these details:
Email Facebook Github Instagram Linkedin Phone Twitter Youtube
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Online Games: Call of Duty data was reported at 0.000 Score in 15 May 2025. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.000 Score for 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Games: Call of Duty data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 15 May 2025, with 1262 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 83.000 Score in 28 Jun 2022 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 15 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Games: Call of Duty data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Costa Rica – Table CR.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Economic Measures: Mortgage Loan data was reported at 10.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 12.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Economic Measures: Mortgage Loan data is updated daily, averaging 10.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 47.000 Score in 21 Apr 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 Feb 2023. Google Search Trends: Economic Measures: Mortgage Loan data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Spain – Table ES.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Computer & Electronics: Apple data was reported at 30.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 33.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Computer & Electronics: Apple data is updated daily, averaging 33.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 09 Sep 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 22 Jun 2023. Google Search Trends: Computer & Electronics: Apple data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Bulgaria – Table BG.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Netflix data was reported at 39.000 Score in 14 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 42.000 Score for 13 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Netflix data is updated daily, averaging 53.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 14 May 2025, with 1261 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 16 Nov 2024 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 Feb 2023. Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Netflix data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s France – Table FR.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Online Classroom: Zoom data was reported at 1.000 Score in 24 Nov 2024. This stayed constant from the previous number of 1.000 Score for 23 Nov 2024. Google Search Trends: Online Classroom: Zoom data is updated daily, averaging 0.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 24 Nov 2024, with 1090 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.000 Score in 21 Apr 2023 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 10 Nov 2024. Google Search Trends: Online Classroom: Zoom data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Bulgaria – Table BG.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Pornhub data was reported at 81.000 Score in 15 May 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 84.000 Score for 14 May 2025. Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Pornhub data is updated daily, averaging 70.000 Score from Dec 2021 (Median) to 15 May 2025, with 1262 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 Score in 01 Jan 2025 and a record low of 0.000 Score in 14 Feb 2023. Google Search Trends: Online Movie: Pornhub data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Google Trends. The data is categorized under Global Database’s France – Table FR.Google.GT: Google Search Trends: by Categories.
You can check the fields description in the documentation: current Full database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/full/?bash; Historical Full database: https://docs.dataforseo.com/v3/databases/google/history/full/?bash.
Full Google Database is a combination of the Advanced Google SERP Database and Google Keyword Database.
Google SERP Database offers millions of SERPs collected in 67 regions with most of Google’s advanced SERP features, including featured snippets, knowledge graphs, people also ask sections, top stories, and more.
Google Keyword Database encompasses billions of search terms enriched with related Google Ads data: search volume trends, CPC, competition, and more.
This database is available in JSON format only.
You don’t have to download fresh data dumps in JSON – we can deliver data straight to your storage or database. We send terrabytes of data to dozens of customers every month using Amazon S3, Google Cloud Storage, Microsoft Azure Blob, Eleasticsearch, and Google Big Query. Let us know if you’d like to get your data to any other storage or database.