Google Earth Engine combines a multi-petabyte catalog of satellite imagery and geospatial datasets with planetary-scale analysis capabilities. Scientists, researchers, and developers use Earth Engine to detect changes, map trends, and quantify differences on the Earth's surface. Earth Engine is now available for commercial use, and remains free for academic and research use.

This example is about how to use Google Earth Engine API on Jupyter Notebooks. We show the example of how to get Landsat Net Primary Production (NPP) CONUS DataSet from Google Earth Engine Data Catalog.

This resource contain the training materials from a workshop held at the 2nd Annual Developers Conference at the University of Utah. It delves into the integration of ground-based observations with remote sensing datasets. The workshop facilitated hands-on experience in employing cloud-based technologies such as Google Earth Engine, Compute Engine, and Cloud Storage for data dissemination. Participants learned to create automated systems for data upload, processing, and dissemination, featuring the Stevens River Ice Monitoring System. This approach enhances collaboration and efficiency in environmental studies by streamlining data handling workflows.

Here's a collection of resources related to the TEAM application (https://jamesmcoll.users.earthengine.app/view/team) Raw Code: https://code.earthengine.google.com/f55a05fbf6e2468e01744d87ca178461

We sampled Google Earth aerial images to get a representative and globally distributed dataset of treeline locations. Google Earth images are available to everyone, but may not be automatically downloaded and processed according to Google's license terms. Since we only wanted to detect tree individuals, we evaluated the aerial images manually by hand.

Â

Doing so, we scaled Google Earth’s GUI interface to a buffer size of approximately 6000 m from a perspective of 100 m (+/- 20 m) above Earth’s surface. Within this buffer zone, we took coordinates and elevation of the highest realized treeline locations. In some remote areas of Russia and Canada, individual trees were not identifiable due to insufficient image resolution. If this was the case, no treeline was sampled, unless we detected another visible treeline within the 6,000 m buffer and took this next highest treeline. We did not apply an automated image processing approach. We calculated mass elevation effect as the distance to t..., The file global-treeline-data.csv contains the whole data set. Please find further information about the data set in the README.md. Please download both files and load the .csv file into your stats software, e.g. R., The global-treeline-data.csv file can be opened with several software options, e.g. R, LibreOffice or any simple editor.

Maps of cropland conversion classes, year of conversion, and pre- and post-conversion land cover associated with Lark et al. (2020). This repository also includes maps of 'local' and 'national' yield differentials for corn, soybeans, and wheat that are associated with the same publication. Code used to generate these data can be found here.

• Lark, T.J., S.A. Spawn, M.F. Bougie, H.K. Gibbs. Cropland expansion in the United States produces marginal yields with disproportionate costs to wildlife. Nature Communications (In review)

Cropland conversion maps are included in a zipped ESRI Geodatabase titled "US_land_conversion_2008-16.gdb". Each feature layer encompasses all of the conterminous United States at a 30m spatial resolution. Feature layers include:

• mtr = "Multi-temporal results"; Classifies land as being one of five broad land use change classes during the 2008-16 study period:
  1. "stable non-cropland" -- areas of consistent non-cropland throughout the duration of the study period.
  2. "stable cropland" -- areas of consistent cropland throughout the duration of the study period.
  3. "cropland expansion" -- areas converted to crop production between 2008 and 2016.
  4. "cropland abandonment" -- areas converted away from crop production between 2008 and 2016.
  5. "intermittent cropland/confusion" -- areas that were cropped for at least two years but show no clear trend towards or away from cropland. These could include areas under a crop-pasture rotation, fallow rotations, or simply areas with repeated classifier confusion.
• ytc = "year to cropland"; Indicates the year in which pixels with an mtr classification of "3" (i.e. "cropland expansion") were converted from non-cropland to cropland. e.g., a value of 2009 represents land that was converted between the 2008 growing season and the 2009 growing season.
• yfc = "year from cropland"; Indicates the year in which pixels with an mtr classification of "4" (i.e. "cropland abandonment") were converted from cropland to non-cropland. e.g., a value of 2009 represents land that was still cropped in 2008 and no longer cropped during the 2009 growing season.
• bfc = "before first crop"; Indicates the last land cover class before a non-crop pixel was converted to cropland. Pixel values correspond to the classification schema of the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) as described in the lookup table here.
• fc = "first crop"; Indicates the class of the first crop planted after a non-crop pixel was converted to cropland. Pixel values correspond to the classification schema of the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) as described in the lookup table here.
• bfnc = "before first non-crop"; Indicates the last cropland class of a pixel before it was abandoned to non-crop land cover. Pixel values correspond to the classification schema of the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) as described in the lookup table here.
• fnc = "first non-crop"; Indicates the first non-crop class of a pixel after it was abandoned to non-crop land cover. Pixel values correspond to the classification schema of the USDA Cropland Data Layer (CDL) as described in the lookup table here.

Yield differential maps are included in the "yieldDifferentials.zip" folder as GeoTIFF rasters with a ~10km spatial resolution. Raster values represent relative (%) differences between the representative yields of new croplands (mtr = 3) and those of stable croplands (mtr = 1) planted to that crop within either (i) the larger 10km x 10km gridcell in which those fields are situated ("local" differentials) or (ii) the entire nation ("national" differentials).

• corn_relDiff_local.tif = local yield differential (%) of corn grain.
• corn_relDiff_national.tif = national yield differential (%) of corn grain.
• soy_relDiff_local.tif = local yield differential (%) of soybeans.
• soy_relDiff_national.tif = national yield differential (%) of soybeans.
• wheat_relDiff_local.tif = local yield differential (%) of wheat.
• wheat_relDiff_national.tif = national yield differential (%) of wheat.

Recently, the satellite images have been used in remote sensing allowing observations with high temporal and spatial distribution. The use of water indices has proved to be an effective methodology in the monitoring of surface water resources. However, precise or automatic methodologies using satellite imagery to determine reservoir volumes are lacking. To fulfil that gap, this methodology proposes 3 stages: use Google Earth Engine (GEE) to select images; automatically calculate flooded surface areas applying water indices; determine the volume stored in reservoirs over those years based on the relation between the flooded area and the stored volume. The method was applied in four reservoirs and contemplate Landsat 4 and 5 ETM and Landsat 8 OLI. For the calculation of the flooded area the NDWI Indexes (McFeeters, 1996; Gao, 1996), and the MNDWI index (Xu, 2006) were applied and tested. The estimation of stored volume of water was made based on the area indices and a cross-check between real stored volume and calculated volume was made. Finally, an analysis on the selection of the best fit water indices was made. The results of every case studies herein displayed showed a quantifiable proficiency and reliability for quite a varied natural conditions. As a conclusion, this methodology could be seen as a tool for water resources management in developing countries, and not only, to measure automatically trends of stored volumes and its relation with the precipitation, and could eventually be extended to other types of surface water bodies, as lakes and coastal lagoons.

My final project in my Spring 2023 Remote Sensing class. This project is an exploration into land classification using google earth engine via python and hydroshare's jupyter notebook. This project identifies a region in the South Metro Denver, CO, pulls in NLCD and landsat8 images from multiple years to identify changes to land cover classification over time.

Are you looking to identify B2B leads to promote your business, product, or service? Outscraper Google Maps Scraper might just be the tool you've been searching for. This powerful software enables you to extract business data directly from Google's extensive database, which spans millions of businesses across countless industries worldwide.

Outscraper Google Maps Scraper is a tool built with advanced technology that lets you scrape a myriad of valuable information about businesses from Google's database. This information includes but is not limited to, business names, addresses, contact information, website URLs, reviews, ratings, and operational hours.

Whether you are a small business trying to make a mark or a large enterprise exploring new territories, the data obtained from the Outscraper Google Maps Scraper can be a treasure trove. This tool provides a cost-effective, efficient, and accurate method to generate leads and gather market insights.

By using Outscraper, you'll gain a significant competitive edge as it allows you to analyze your market and find potential B2B leads with precision. You can use this data to understand your competitors' landscape, discover new markets, or enhance your customer database. The tool offers the flexibility to extract data based on specific parameters like business category or geographic location, helping you to target the most relevant leads for your business.

In a world that's growing increasingly data-driven, utilizing a tool like Outscraper Google Maps Scraper could be instrumental to your business' success. If you're looking to get ahead in your market and find B2B leads in a more efficient and precise manner, Outscraper is worth considering. It streamlines the data collection process, allowing you to focus on what truly matters – using the data to grow your business.

https://outscraper.com/google-maps-scraper/

As a result of the Google Maps scraping, your data file will contain the following details:

Query Name Site Type Subtypes Category Phone Full Address Borough Street City Postal Code State Us State Country Country Code Latitude Longitude Time Zone Plus Code Rating Reviews Reviews Link Reviews Per Scores Photos Count Photo Street View Working Hours Working Hours Old Format Popular Times Business Status About Range Posts Verified Owner ID Owner Title Owner Link Reservation Links Booking Appointment Link Menu Link Order Links Location Link Place ID Google ID Reviews ID

If you want to enrich your datasets with social media accounts and many more details you could combine Google Maps Scraper with Domain Contact Scraper.

Domain Contact Scraper can scrape these details:

Email Facebook Github Instagram Linkedin Phone Twitter Youtube

This is a resource that compiles the term projects done by the students of the CEE 5003 course Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces, Spring 2024. Presentation recordings are here https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOP6OF1n-WBGsQv4m0O3uNgL64yrF6cOZ

Fast flood extent monitoring with SAR change detection using Google Earth Engine This dataset develops a tool for near real-time flood monitoring through a novel combining of multi-temporal and multi-source remote sensing data. We use a SAR change detection and thresholding method, and apply sensitivity analytics and thresholding calibration, using SAR-based and optical-based indices in a format that is streamlined, reproducible, and geographically agile. We leverage the massive repository of satellite imagery and planetary-scale geospatial analysis tools of GEE to devise a flood inundation extent model that is both scalable and replicable. The flood extents from the 2021 Hurricane Ida and the 2017 Hurricane Harvey were selected to test the approach. The methodology provides a fast, automatable, and geographically reliable tool for assisting decision-makers and emergency planners using near real-time multi-temporal satellite SAR data sets. GEE code was developed by Ebrahim Hamidi and reviewed by Brad G. Peter; Figures were created by Brad G. Peter. This tool accompanies a publication Hamidi et al., 2023: E. Hamidi, B. G. Peter, D. F. Muñoz, H. Moftakhari and H. Moradkhani, "Fast Flood Extent Monitoring with SAR Change Detection Using Google Earth Engine," in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3240097. GEE input datasets: Methodology flowchart: Sensitivity Analysis: GEE code (muti-source and multi-temporal flood monitoring): https://code.earthengine.google.com/7f4942ab0c73503e88287ad7e9187150 The threshold sensitivity analysis is automated in the below GEE code: https://code.earthengine.google.com/a3fbfe338c69232a75cbcd0eb6bc0c8e The above scripts can be run independently. The threshold automation code identifies the optimal threshold values for use in the flood monitoring procedure. GEE code for Hurricane Harvey, east of Houston Java script: // Study Area Boundaries var bounds = /* color: #d63000 */ee.Geometry.Polygon( [[[-94.5214452285728, 30.165244882083663], [-94.5214452285728, 29.56024879238989], [-93.36650748443218, 29.56024879238989], [-93.36650748443218, 30.165244882083663]]], null, false); // [before_start,before_end,after_start,after_end,k_ndfi,k_ri,k_diff,mndwi_threshold] var params = ['2017-06-01','2017-06-15','2017-08-01','2017-09-10',1.0,0.25,0.8,0.4] // SAR Input Data var before_start = params[0] var before_end = params[1] var after_start = params[2] var after_end = params[3] var polarization = "VH" var pass_direction = "ASCENDING" // k Coeficient Values for NDFI, RI and DII SAR Indices (Flooded Pixel Thresholding; Equation 4) var k_ndfi = params[4] var k_ri = params[5] var k_diff = params[6] // MNDWI flooded pixels Threshold Criteria var mndwi_threshold = params[7] // Datasets ----------------------------------- var dem = ee.Image("USGS/3DEP/10m").select('elevation') var slope = ee.Terrain.slope(dem) var swater = ee.Image('JRC/GSW1_0/GlobalSurfaceWater').select('seasonality') var collection = ee.ImageCollection('COPERNICUS/S1_GRD') .filter(ee.Filter.eq('instrumentMode', 'IW')) .filter(ee.Filter.listContains('transmitterReceiverPolarisation', polarization)) .filter(ee.Filter.eq('orbitProperties_pass', pass_direction)) .filter(ee.Filter.eq('resolution_meters', 10)) .filterBounds(bounds) .select(polarization) var before = collection.filterDate(before_start, before_end) var after = collection.filterDate(after_start, after_end) print("before", before) print("after", after) // Generating Reference and Flood Multi-temporal SAR Data ------------------------ // Mean Before and Min After ------------------------ var mean_before = before.mean().clip(bounds) var min_after = after.min().clip(bounds) var max_after = after.max().clip(bounds) var mean_after = after.mean().clip(bounds) Map.addLayer(mean_before, {min: -29.264204107025904, max: -8.938093778644141, palette: []}, "mean_before",0) Map.addLayer(min_after, {min: -29.29334290990966, max: -11.928313976797138, palette: []}, "min_after",1) // Flood identification ------------------------ // NDFI ------------------------ var ndfi = mean_before.abs().subtract(min_after.abs()) .divide(mean_before.abs().add(min_after.abs())) var ndfi_filtered = ndfi.focal_mean({radius: 50, kernelType: 'circle', units: 'meters'}) // NDFI Normalization ----------------------- var ndfi_min = ndfi_filtered.reduceRegion({ reducer: ee.Reducer.min(), geometry: bounds, scale: 10, maxPixels: 1e13 }) var ndfi_max = ndfi_filtered.reduceRegion({ reducer: ee.Reducer.max(), geometry: bounds, scale: 10, maxPixels: 1e13 }) var ndfi_rang = ee.Number(ndfi_max.get('VH')).subtract(ee.Number(ndfi_min.get('VH'))) var ndfi_subtctMin = ndfi_filtered.subtract(ee.Number(ndfi_min.get('VH'))) var ndfi_norm = ndfi_subtctMin.divide(ndfi_rang) Map.addLayer(ndfi_norm, {min: 0.3862747346632676, max: ... Visit https://dataone.org/datasets/sha256%3A5a49b694a219afd20f5b3b730302b6d76b7acb1cc888f47d63648df8acd4d97e for complete metadata about this dataset.

The aridity index also known as the dryness index is the ratio of potential evapotranspiration to precipitation. The aridity index indicates water deficiency. The aridity index is used to classify locations as humid or dry. The evaporation ratio (evaporation index) on the other hand indicates the availability of water in watersheds. The evaporation index is inversely proportional to water availability. For long periods renewable water resources availability is residual precipitation after evaporation loss is deducted. These two ratios provide very useful information about water availability. Understating the powerful potential of the aridity index and evaporation ratio, this app is developed on the Google Earth Engine using NLDAS-2 and MODIS products to map temporal variability of the Aridity Index and Evaporation ratio over CONUS. The app can be found at https://cartoscience.users.earthengine.app/view/aridity-index.

Google is not only popular in its home country, but is also the dominant internet search provider in many major online markets, frequently generating between ** and ** percent of desktop search traffic. The search engine giant has a market share of over ** percent in India and accounted for the majority of the global search engine market, way ahead of other competitors such as Yahoo, Bing, Yandex, and Baidu. Google’s online dominance All roads lead to Rome, or if you are browsing the internet, all roads lead to Google. It is hard to imagine an online experience without the online behemoth, as the company offers a wide range of online products and services that all seamlessly integrate with each other. Google search and advertising are the core products of the company, accounting for the vast majority of the company revenues. When adding this up with the Chrome browser, Gmail, Google Maps, YouTube, Google’s ownership of the Android mobile operating system, and various other consumer and enterprise services, Google is basically a one-stop shop for online needs. Google anti-trust rulings However, Google’s dominance of the search market is not always welcome and is keenly watched by authorities and industry watchdogs – since 2017, the EU commission has fined Google over ***** billion euros in antitrust fines for abusing its monopoly in online advertising. In March 2019, European Commission found that Google violated antitrust regulations by imposing contractual restrictions on third-party websites in order to make them less competitive and fined the company *** billion euros.

A Google Earth Engine App developed to delineate water bodies around the globe from 1984 until present and to provide 16 day estimates of surface area of water bodies as well as shapefiles to the user. The app uses a novel framework to filters only those images that cloud is on top of the water body and allows users to choose from a list of spectral water indices to map water bodies. The app also allows users to select the choice of threshold (i.e., a fixed zero threshold or dynamic threshold to separate water form non-water background).

Comprehensive dataset comparing the return on investment (ROI) of Google Maps optimization and traditional search engine optimization (SEO) for businesses in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The dataset includes detailed performance metrics, implementation costs, revenue attribution, and strategic analysis to help local companies determine the optimal marketing investment strategy.

Historical data of traffic measurement points. Each month the data of the previous month are incorporated. In this same portal you can find other related data sets such as: Traffic. Real-time traffic data . With real-time information (updated every 5 minutes) Traffic. Location of traffic measurement points. Map of traffic intensity plots, with the same information in KML format, and with the possibility of viewing it in Google Maps or Google Earth. And other traffic-related data sets. You can search for them by putting the word 'Traffic' in the search engine (top right). In the section 'Associated documentation', there is an explanatory document with the structure of the files and recommendations on the use of the data.

This JavaScript code has been developed to retrieve NDSI_Snow_Cover from MODIS version 6 for SNOTEL sites using the Google Earth Engine platform. To successfully run the code, you should have a Google Earth Engine account. An input file, called NWM_grid_Western_US_polygons_SNOTEL_ID.zip, is required to run the code. This input file includes 1 km grid cells of the NWM containing SNOTEL sites. You need to upload this input file to the Assets tap in the Google Earth Engine code editor. You also need to import the MOD10A1.006 Terra Snow Cover Daily Global 500m collection to the Google Earth Engine code editor. You may do this by searching for the product name in the search bar of the code editor.

The JavaScript works for s specified time range. We found that the best period is a month, which is the maximum allowable time range to do the computation for all SNOTEL sites on Google Earth Engine. The script consists of two main loops. The first loop retrieves data for the first day of a month up to day 28 through five periods. The second loop retrieves data from day 28 to the beginning of the next month. The results will be shown as graphs on the right-hand side of the Google Earth Engine code editor under the Console tap. To save results as CSV files, open each time-series by clicking on the button located at each graph's top right corner. From the new web page, you can click on the Download CSV button on top.

Here is the link to the script path: https://code.earthengine.google.com/?scriptPath=users%2Figarousi%2Fppr2-modis%3AMODIS-monthly

Then, run the Jupyter Notebook (merge_downloaded_csv_files.ipynb) to merge the downloaded CSV files that are stored for example in a folder called output/from_GEE into one single CSV file which is merged.csv. The Jupyter Notebook then applies some preprocessing steps and the final output is NDSI_FSCA_MODIS_C6.csv.

Open and synergistic global land cover present a global land cover dataset which is available every 5 year from 1990 to 2020. The overall accuracies of land cover maps were around 75% and the accuracy for change detection was over 70%. This product also showed good similarity with the FAO and existing land cover maps. Multiple datasets were used in this study, including the FROM-GLC global land cover map in 2017, which was the most up to date and accurate land cover map among the three FROM-GLC maps in 2010, 2015 and 2017. Landsat surface reflectance dataset, The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM), ESA-CCI and three recent single-type land cover datasets. Open and synergistic land cover maps were provided for the entire world from 1990 to 2020 every 5 years. The global land cover map contains values of 1 to 10, representing cropland, forest, grassland, shrubland, wetland, water, tundra, impervious surface, bareland and ice&snow, respectively. The dataset extends from 90° N to 60° S latitude and from 180° W to 180° E longitude. The dataset can be visualized and analysed directly through Google Earth Engine (GEE) cloud computing platform and it could also be exported to local equipment through GEE.

In 2021, approximately ************** of consumers in Germany, France, the United States, and the United Kingdom (UK) stated they used Google when looking for local business information, making it the most commonly used and by far the most dominant search engine for this purpose. There were, however, many other search engine platforms frequently used by consumers including Apple Maps, Yahoo, Tripadvisor, as well as other content-specific websites and apps.

This data package includes two shapefiles and their associated attribute tables. The two files, GFB_producers_2021-02-18.zip and GFB_retailers_2021-02-18.zip, contain all internet-discoverable (at the time of data collection, July-August 2020; with minor edits/additions circa June 2022) grass-fed beef producers and retailers in the Southwest and Southern Plains of the U.S. (Arizona, California, Colorado, Kansas, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah), compiled through an internet search. The data were initially collected in August of 2020 using publicly available information from Google search engine and Google map searches with the intention of informing members of the Sustainable Southwest Beef Project (USDA NIFA grant #2019-69012-29853) team about existing grass-fed beef producers and retailers in the study area.