This map shows schools, school districts, and population density throughout the US. Click on the map to learn more about the school districts and schools within an area. A few things you can learn within this map:How many public/private schools fall within the district?What type of population density lives within this district? Socioeconomic factors about the Census Tracts which fall within the district:School enrollment of under 19 by grade Children living below the poverty level Children with no internet at home Children without a working parentRace/ethnicity breakdown of the population within the districtFor more information about the data sources:Socioeconomic factors:The American Community Survey (ACS) helps us understand the population in the US. This app uses the 5-year estimates, and the data is updated annually when the U.S. Census Bureau releases the newest estimates. For detailed metadata, visit the links in the bullet points above. Current School Districts layer:The National Center for Education Statistics’ (NCES) Education Demographic and Geographic Estimate (EDGE) program develops annually updated school district boundary composite files that include public elementary, secondary, and unified school district boundaries clipped to the U.S. shoreline. School districts are single-purpose administrative units designed by state and local officials to organize and provide public education for local residents. District boundaries are collected for NCES by the U.S. Census Bureau to support educational research and program administration, and the boundaries are essential for constructing district-level estimates of the number of children in poverty.The Census Bureau’s School District Boundary Review program (SDRP) (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sdrp.html) obtains the boundaries, names, and grade ranges from state officials, and integrates these updates into Census TIGER. Census TIGER boundaries include legal maritime buffers for coastal areas by default, but the NCES composite file removes these buffers to facilitate broader use and cleaner cartographic representation. The NCES EDGE program collaborates with the U.S. Census Bureau’s Education Demographic, Geographic, and Economic Statistics (EDGE) Branch to develop the composite school district files. The inputs for this data layer were developed from Census TIGER/Line and represent the most current boundaries available. For more information about NCES school district boundary data, see https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/DistrictBoundaries.Private Schools layer:This Private Schools feature dataset is composed of private elementary and secondary education facilities in the United States as defined by the Private School Survey (PSS, https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pss/), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov), US Department of Education for the 2017-2018 school year. This includes all prekindergarten through 12th grade schools as tracked by the PSS. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by NGA. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the Place Keyword section of the metadata. This release includes the addition of 2675 new records, modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 19836 records, the removal of 254 records no longer applicable. Additionally, 10,870 records were removed that previously had a STATUS value of 2 (Unknown; not represented in the most recent PSS data) and duplicate records identified by ORNL.Public Schools layer:This Public Schools feature dataset is composed of all Public elementary and secondary education facilities in the United States as defined by the Common Core of Data (CCD, https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ ), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov ), US Department of Education for the 2017-2018 school year. This includes all Kindergarten through 12th grade schools as tracked by the Common Core of Data. Included in this dataset are military schools in US territories and referenced in the city field with an APO or FPO address. DOD schools represented in the NCES data that are outside of the United States or US territories have been omitted. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by NGA. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the Place Keyword section of the metadata. This release includes the addition of 3065 new records, modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 99,287 records, and removal of 2996 records not present in the NCES CCD data.WorldPop Populated Foorprint layer:This layer represents an estimate of the footprint of human settlement in 2020. It is intended as a fast-drawing cartographic layer to augment base maps and to focus a map reader's attention on the location of human population. This layer is not intended for analysis.This layer was derived from the 2020 slice of the WorldPop Population Density 2000-2020 100m and 1km layers. WorldPop modeled this population footprint based on imagery datasets and population data from national statistical organizations and the United Nations. Zooming in to very large scales will often show discrepancies between reality and this or any model. Like all data sources imagery and population counts are subject to many types of error, thus this gridded footprint contains errors of omission and commission. The imagery base maps available in ArcGIS Online were not used in WorldPop's model. Imagery only informs the model of characteristics that indicate a potential for settlement, and cannot intrinsically indicate whether any or how many people live in a building.

The National Center for Education Statistics’ (NCES) Education Demographic and Geographic Estimate (EDGE) program develops bi-annually updated point locations (latitude and longitude) for private schools included in the NCES Private School Survey (PSS). The PSS is conducted to provide a biennial count of the total number of private schools, teachers, and students. The PSS school location and associated geographic area assignments are derived from reported information about the physical location of private schools. The school geocode file includes supplemental geographic information for the universe of schools reported in the 2019-2020 PSS school collection, and they can be integrated with the survey files through use of institutional identifiers included in both sources. For more information about NCES school point data, see: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/SchoolLocations and https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/LocaleBoundaries.All information contained in this file is in the public domain. Data users are advised to review NCES program documentation and feature class metadata to understand the limitations and appropriate use of these data.

The 2021-2022 School Learning Modalities dataset provides weekly estimates of school learning modality (including in-person, remote, or hybrid learning) for U.S. K-12 public and independent charter school districts for the 2021-2022 school year and the Fall 2022 semester, from August 2021 – December 2022. These data were modeled using multiple sources of input data (see below) to infer the most likely learning modality of a school district for a given week. These data should be considered district-level estimates and may not always reflect true learning modality, particularly for districts in which data are unavailable. If a district reports multiple modality types within the same week, the modality offered for the majority of those days is reflected in the weekly estimate. All school district metadata are sourced from the National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) for 2020-2021. School learning modality types are defined as follows: In-Person: All schools within the district offer face-to-face instruction 5 days per week to all students at all available grade levels. Remote: Schools within the district do not offer face-to-face instruction; all learning is conducted online/remotely to all students at all available grade levels. Hybrid: Schools within the district offer a combination of in-person and remote learning; face-to-face instruction is offered less than 5 days per week, or only to a subset of students. Data Information School learning modality data provided here are model estimates using combined input data and are not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. This learning modality dataset was generated by combining data from four different sources: Burbio [1], MCH Strategic Data [2], the AEI/Return to Learn Tracker [3], and state dashboards [4-20]. These data were combined using a Hidden Markov model which infers the sequence of learning modalities (In-Person, Hybrid, or Remote) for each district that is most likely to produce the modalities reported by these sources. This model was trained using data from the 2020-2021 school year. Metadata describing the location, number of schools and number of students in each district comes from NCES [21]. You can read more about the model in the CDC MMWR: COVID-19–Related School Closures and Learning Modality Changes — United States, August 1–September 17, 2021. The metrics listed for each school learning modality reflect totals by district and the number of enrolled students per district for which data are available. School districts represented here exclude private schools and include the following NCES subtypes: Public school district that is NOT a component of a supervisory union Public school district that is a component of a supervisory union Independent charter district “BI” in the state column refers to school districts funded by the Bureau of Indian Education. Technical Notes Data from August 1, 2021 to June 24, 2022 correspond to the 2021-2022 school year. During this time frame, data from the AEI/Return to Learn Tracker and most state dashboards were not available. Inferred modalities with a probability below 0.6 were deemed inconclusive and were omitted. During the Fall 2022 semester, modalities for districts with a school closure reported by Burbio were updated to either “Remote”, if the closure spanned the entire week, or “Hybrid”, if the closure spanned 1-4 days of the week. Data from August

Context

Ohio COVID 19 Data by School District.

Content

From the website: *"This data reflects new and cumulative COVID-19 cases reported to schools by parents/guardians and staff. Schools are required to report cases to their assigned Local Health Department who then report to the Ohio Department of Health. A report of COVID-19 should not be interpreted as an indicator that a school district or school isn’t following proper procedures—school cases can be a reflection of the overall situation in the broader community. Families and staff should always feel free to ask questions of the school district or school.

For more details on schools and the education sector, please see Sector Specific Operating Requirements: https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/responsible-restart-ohio/sector-specific-operating-requirements/sector-specific-operating-requirements

School reporting templates, a list of school districts and their corresponding local health departments, and more can be found on the Education and Sector Specific Guidance page under “Schools”: https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid-19/responsible-restart-ohio/sector-specific-operating-requirements/sector-specific-operating-requirements

For more details, please see: https://coronavirus.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/covid19/dashboards/Schools-and-Children/schools"*

Acknowledgements

The start of Ohio

Inspiration

Visualize on a map (after joining with school district by location), look for trends, etc

This web map provides and in-depth look at school districts within the United States. Clicking on a school district in the map will reveal different statistics about each district in the pop-up. The statistics presented in this map are approximations based on summarizing American Community Survey(ACS) data using tract centroids. They may differ from published statistics by school districts found on data.census.gov. A few things you will learn from this map:How many public and private schools fall within a district?Socioeconomic factors about the Census Tracts which fall within the district:School enrollment for grades Kindergarten through 12thDisconnected children in the districtChildren living below the poverty level Children with no internet at home Children without a working parentRace/ethnicity breakdown of population under the age of 19 in the districtFor more information about the data sources:This map uses these hosted feature layers containing the most recent American Community Survey data. These layers are part of the ArcGIS Living Atlas, and are updated every year when the American Community Survey releases estimates, so values in the map always reflect the newest data available.Current School Districts Layer:The National Center for Education Statistics’ (NCES) Education Demographic and Geographic Estimate (EDGE) program develops annually updated school district boundary composite files that include public elementary, secondary, and unified school district boundaries clipped to the U.S. shoreline. School districts are single-purpose administrative units designed by state and local officials to organize and provide public education for local residents. District boundaries are collected for NCES by the U.S. Census Bureau to support educational research and program administration, and the boundaries are essential for constructing district-level estimates of the number of children in poverty.The Census Bureau’s School District Boundary Review program (SDRP) (https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sdrp.html) obtains the boundaries, names, and grade ranges from state officials, and integrates these updates into Census TIGER. Census TIGER boundaries include legal maritime buffers for coastal areas by default, but the NCES composite file removes these buffers to facilitate broader use and cleaner cartographic representation. The NCES EDGE program collaborates with the U.S. Census Bureau’s Education Demographic, Geographic, and Economic Statistics (EDGE) Branch to develop the composite school district files. The inputs for this data layer were developed from Census TIGER/Line and represent the most current boundaries available. For more information about NCES school district boundary data, see https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/DistrictBoundaries.Public Schools Layer:This Public Schools feature dataset is composed of all Public elementary and secondary education facilities in the United States as defined by the Common Core of Data (CCD, https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/ ), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov ), US Department of Education for the 2017-2018 school year. This includes all Kindergarten through 12th grade schools as tracked by the Common Core of Data. Included in this dataset are military schools in US territories and referenced in the city field with an APO or FPO address. DOD schools represented in the NCES data that are outside of the United States or US territories have been omitted. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by NGA. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the Place Keyword section of the metadata. This release includes the addition of 3065 new records, modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 99,287 records, and removal of 2996 records not present in the NCES CCD data.Private Schools Layer:This Private Schools feature dataset is composed of private elementary and secondary education facilities in the United States as defined by the Private School Survey (PSS, https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pss/), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov), US Department of Education for the 2017-2018 school year. This includes all prekindergarten through 12th grade schools as tracked by the PSS. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by NGA. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the Place Keyword section of the metadata. This release includes the addition of 2675 new records, modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 19836 records, the removal of 254 records no longer applicable. Additionally, 10,870 records were removed that previously had a STATUS value of 2 (Unknown; not represented in the most recent PSS data) and duplicate records identified by ORNL.Web Map originally owned by Summers Cleary

This dataset contains immunization status of kindergarten students in California in schools. Explanation of the different immunizations is in the attached data dictionary. The California Health and Safety Code Section 120325-75 requires students to provide proof of immunization for school and child care entry. Additionally, California Health and Safety Code Section 120375 and California Code of Regulation Section 6075 require all schools and child care facilities to assess and report annually the immunization status of their enrollees.

The annual kindergarten assessment is conducted each fall to monitor compliance with the California School Immunization law. Results from this assessment are used to measure immunization coverage among students entering kindergarten. Not all schools reported. This data set presents results from the kindergarten assessment and immunization coverage in kindergarten schools by county. To review individual school coverage and exemption rates in a separate lookup format, go to the School Lookup page at the Immunization Branch's Shots for School website: http://www.shotsforschool.org/lookup/

To see the PDF reports by year go to:https://www.shotsforschool.org/k-12/reporting-data/

See the attached file 'Notes on Methods' for data suppression in the '2016-17 ' data and after.

For earlier years of data: https://www.shotsforschool.org/k-12/reporting-data/

The Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education collects a variety of data from schools and districts in the state. Much of the information collected is published in the School and District Profiles. A "profile" is a snapshot of the data for a specific school or district. Users can also find school and district directories.

In addition to individual profiles and directories, users can also view and download statewide data reports. The Massachusetts Education-to-Career Research and Data Hub publishes many of the statewide reports as datasets here in the public data portal. If you wish to download multiple years of data at once, multiple student groups, or other cuts of data that are more difficult to download via School and District Profiles, please search for it here in the E2C Hub.

The 2020-2021 School Learning Modalities dataset provides weekly estimates of school learning modality (including in-person, remote, or hybrid learning) for U.S. K-12 public and independent charter school districts for the 2020-2021 school year, from August 2020 – June 2021.

These data were modeled using multiple sources of input data (see below) to infer the most likely learning modality of a school district for a given week. These data should be considered district-level estimates and may not always reflect true learning modality, particularly for districts in which data are unavailable. If a district reports multiple modality types within the same week, the modality offered for the majority of those days is reflected in the weekly estimate. All school district metadata are sourced from the https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/files.asp#Fiscal:2,LevelId:5,SchoolYearId:35,Page:1">National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) for 2020-2021.

School learning modality types are defined as follows:

• In-Person: All schools within the district offer face-to-face instruction 5 days per week to all students at all available grade levels.
• Remote: Schools within the district do not offer face-to-face instruction; all learning is conducted online/remotely to all students at all available grade levels.
• Hybrid: Schools within the district offer a combination of in-person and remote learning; face-to-face instruction is offered less than 5 days per week, or only to a subset of students.

Data Information

• School learning modality data provided here are model estimates using combined input data and are not guaranteed to be 100% accurate. This learning modality dataset was generated by combining data from four different sources: Burbio [1], MCH Strategic Data [2], the AEI/Return to Learn Tracker [3], and state dashboards [4-20]. These data were combined using a Hidden Markov model which infers the sequence of learning modalities (In-Person, Hybrid, or Remote) for each district that is most likely to produce the modalities reported by these sources. This model was trained using data from the 2020-2021 school year. Metadata describing the location, number of schools and number of students in each district comes from NCES [21].
• You can read more about the model in the CDC MMWR: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7039e2.htm" target="_blank">COVID-19–Related School Closures and Learning Modality Changes — United States, August 1–September 17, 2021.
• The metrics listed for each school learning modality reflect totals by district and the number of enrolled students per district for which data are available. School districts represented here exclude private schools and include the following NCES subtypes:
  • Public school district that is NOT a component of a supervisory union
  • Public school district that is a component of a supervisory union
  • Independent charter district
• “BI” in the state column refers to school districts funded by the Bureau of Indian Education.

Technical Notes

• Data from September 1, 2020 to June 25, 2021 correspond to the 2020-2021 school year. During this timeframe, all four sources of data were available. Inferred modalities with a probability below 0.75 were deemed inconclusive and were omitted.
• Data for the month of July may show “In Person” status although most school districts are effectively closed during this time for summer break. Users may wish to exclude July data from use for this reason where applicable.

Sources

1. K-12 School Opening Tracker. Burbio 2021; https

The National Center for Education Statistics’ (NCES) Education Demographic and Geographic Estimate (EDGE) program develops bi-annually updated point locations (latitude and longitude) for private schools included in the NCES Private School Survey (PSS). The PSS is conducted to generate biennial data on the total number of private schools, teachers, and students, and to build an accurate and complete list of private schools to serve as a sampling frame for NCES surveys. The PSS school location and associated geographic area assignments are derived from reported information about the physical location of private schools. The school geocode file includes supplemental geographic information for the universe of schools reported in the 2017-2018 PSS school sample, and they can be integrated with the survey files through use of institutional identifiers included in both sources. For more information about NCES school point data, see: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/SchoolLocations and https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/LocaleBoundaries.All information contained in this file is in the public domain. Data users are advised to review NCES program documentation and feature class metadata to understand the limitations and appropriate use of these data.

This dataset shows the attendance rates for all NSW government schools in Semester One by alphabetical order.

Data Notes:

• 2021 data is not comparable to previous years due to the continued effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, changes to calculation rules to align with ACARA’s national standards (version 3) and changes to the way attendance data is transferred into the department’s centralised data warehouse. Please refer to 2021 Semester 1 student attendance factsheet for more information.

• 2020 data is not provided because students were encouraged to learn from home for several weeks in Semester 1. Please refer to the factsheet on The effects of COVID-19 on attendance during Semester 1 2020 for more information.

• In 2018 NSW government schools implemented the national standards for student attendance data reporting. This resulted in a fall in attendance rates for most schools due to the inclusion of part day absences and accounting for student mobility in the calculation. Data from 2018 onwards is not comparable with earlier years.

• Schools for Specific Purposes (SSPs) are only included from 2021. Prior to this SSP attendance data was not collected centrally.

• The attendance rate is defined as the number of actual full-time equivalent student days attended by full-time students in Years 1–10 as a percentage of the total number of possible student-days attended in Semester 1. Figures are aligned with the National Report on Schooling and the My School website.

• Data is suppressed "sp" for schools where student numbers are below the reporting threshold.

• Data is not available "na" for senior secondary schools or other schools where no students were enrolled in Years 1-10.

• Blank cells indicate no students were enrolled at the school that census year or the school was out of scope for attendance reporting.

Data Source:

• Education Statistics & Measurement, Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation

The National Center for Education Statistics’ (NCES) Education Demographic and Geographic Estimate (EDGE) program develops bi-annually updated point locations (latitude and longitude) for private schools included in the NCES Private School Survey (PSS). The PSS is conducted to generate biennial data on the total number of private schools, teachers, and students, and to build an accurate and complete list of private schools to serve as a sampling frame for NCES surveys. The PSS school location and associated geographic area assignments are derived from reported information about the physical location of private schools. The school geocode file includes supplemental geographic information for the universe of schools reported in the 2015-2016 PSS school sample, and they can be integrated with the survey files through use of institutional identifiers included in both sources. For more information about NCES school point data, see: https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/SchoolLocations and https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/Geographic/LocaleBoundaries.All information contained in this file is in the public domain. Data users are advised to review NCES program documentation and feature class metadata to understand the limitations and appropriate use of these data.

About this Dataset

This Private Schools feature dataset is composed of private elementary and secondary education facilities in the United States as defined by the Private School Survey (PSS, https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/pss/), National Center for Education Statistics (NCES, https://nces.ed.gov), US Department of Education for the 2015-2016 school year. This includes all prekindergarten through 12th grade schools as tracked by the PSS. This feature class contains all MEDS/MEDS+ as approved by NGA. Complete field and attribute information is available in the ”Entities and Attributes” metadata section. Geographical coverage is depicted in the thumbnail above and detailed in the Place Keyword section of the metadata. This release includes the addition of 3301 new records, modifications to the spatial location and/or attribution of 19127 records, and the retention of 8636 records from the previous PSS datasets that may or may not be closed (see STATUS field). The ADDRESS2 and DISTRICT_ID fields, previously populated with NOT AVAILABLE, have been removed. This feature class does not have a relationship class.

Category

Education

Keywords

private schools,school,Education

Row Count

31064

Price

$299.00

Abstract

This impact evaluation was conducted by IDinsight for STIR Education in Delhi and Uttar Pradesh in India, and was funded by a World Bank Strategic Impact Evaluation Fund grant. The study seeks to evaluate the impact of STIR's purely motivational, pedagogically neutral, teacher-focused model on student learning levels. STIR works with teachers in low-cost and government schools in order to improve student learning by empowering teachers to act as change-makers and to innovate to overcome challenges in the classroom. IDinsight conducted two three-armed randomized control trials. The study looks at outcomes from 180 Affordable Private Schools (APS) in Delhi and 270 government schools in the Raebareli and Varanasi districts of Uttar Pradesh. The study began in early 2015, and lasted two academic years. In addition to measuring STIR's impact in two different contexts, the study simultaneously tests two iterations of STIR's model in these two contexts.

Geographic coverage

One district in Delhi - East Delhi, and two districts in Uttar Pradesh - Raebareli and Varanasi

Analysis unit

For student learning, the basic unit of analysis is students. For classroom practices, the basic unit of analysis is teachers. For teacher motivation, the basic unit of analysis is teachers.

Universe

• 180 Affordable Private Schools in Delhi, 540 teachers amongst these schools and 5,400 students
• 270 Government Schools in Uttar Pradesh, 810 teachers amongst these schools and 8,100 students

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

Baseline Respondent Identification and Sampling Strategy:

Delhi:

Teacher Motivation: STIR initially did a search process of several hundred Affordable Private Schools (APS) in east Delhi. From these schools, STIR passed school names onto IDinsight where the teachers might be interested in working with IDinsight. IDinsight attempted to sample all schools for the Teacher Motivation survey. In total, IDinsight interviewed 1,259 teachers for the Teacher Motivation survey.

Classroom Observation: From these 1,259 teachers, STIR did an additional round of screening to determine which teachers were the most interested and returned a list of 810 teachers to IDinsight. This list formed the basis of the classroom observation. However, due to attrition and refusals at the school level we were unable to meet our target of teachers and ended up surveying only 342 teachers.

Student Testing: For sampling students in the classroom, IDinsight sampled 10 students per classroom in classes (of all teachers covered for the classroom observation) with more than 10 students using the attendance register for the day the enumerator came to the class. In classes with fewer than 10 students, all children were sampled.

Uttar Pradesh:

Teacher Motivation: In Uttar Pradesh, IDinsight obtained a list of all clusters in Raebareli and Varanasi districts that STIR was working in. From this list, IDinsight selected all clusters with more than 16 schools. This was done to ensure that there would be enough schools in the cluster to assign some to the control group while also maintaining enough treatment schools for STIR to form a network. For the Teacher Motivation survey, IDinsight surveyed all teachers in the school, yielding 1,145 teachers.

Classroom Observation: For the classroom observation, IDinsight sampled roughly 2/3 of the teachers who completed the Teacher Motivation questionnaire, to get a final list of roughly 810 teachers. Teachers were added to this list due to teachers dropping out and the final number was 838 teachers.

Student Testing: For sampling students in the classroom, IDinsight sampled 10 students per classroom in classes with more than 10 students using the attendance register for the day the enumerator came to the class. In classes with fewer than 10 students, all children were sampled.

Midline Respondent Identification and Sampling Strategy:

For midline, which took place at the beginning of the second academic year, we followed up with teachers and students surveyed at baseline. Teachers were added only in the case where the number of teachers still teaching in the school from our baseline lists fell below a certain number. In Delhi, teachers were added if less than two teachers from our list in a given school were available and in Uttar Pradesh, new teachers were added only if all teachers from our baseline lists in a given school dropped out.

The sampling strategy had two clear advantages: 1) It helped us target teachers and students that have been exposed to STIR for as long as possible since the timeline for the overall evaluation is relatively short. 2) The evaluations are already quite complex and this helped have a clear interpretation and narrative surrounding the results.

Delhi:

Teacher Motivation: From the list of 1,259 teachers surveyed at teacher motivation baseline, 453 teachers dropped out of schools during the academic year and hence were not available for surveying during midline. A further 65 teachers refused to participate and 84 teachers were not available during the data collection period. Given this, the total number of teachers surveyed at teacher motivation midline was 657. These teachers formed the sample for analyses.

Classroom Observation: For classroom observations, we attempted to collect data for all 811 teachers on the Delhi original list. For those schools where the number of teachers available from our 811 list fell below two, 148 new teachers were added based on a random selection from those teachers employed at that school as of 1 July 2015. A total of 459 teachers were surveyed as part of the classroom observation midline.

Student Testing: For testing of student learning levels, all students surveyed at baseline formed the potential sample at midline. Among the 3,367 students from baseline, 1,956 students were tracked and surveyed at midline. 1,127 students had dropped out from the schools. 40 students were absent throughout the course of the data collection, and were not found in schools during any of the five revisits. The remaining 244 students were in schools where we could not survey.

Uttar Pradesh:

Teacher Motivation: From the 1,145 teachers surveyed at baseline, 288 teachers dropped out of schools during the course of the academic year and were hence not available for data collection. An additional 61 refused to participate in the data collection and 41 were not available through the course of the data collection. The final number of teachers surveyed at midline were 755. This was the sample for analysis.

Classroom Observation: From the list of 838 teachers surveyed at baseline, we successfully observed the classrooms of 734 of these teachers at midline. Another 13 teachers were added in schools where all teachers from our 838 had dropped out. 12 of these 13 were in Raebareli and 1 was in Varanasi. In total, 747 teachers were surveyed. 82 teachers dropped out of the schools in our sample. 13 teachers refused to participate in the data collection and 14 teachers were absent throughout the survey period and were not available on either of our visits.

Student Testing: Of the 7,386 students tested at baseline, a total of 4,560 students were also tested at midline. 615 students were absent all days of visits to the schools. 149 students were in the four schools that refused data collection. 2,062 dropped out of the schools in our sample.

Endline Respondent Identification and Sampling Strategy:

For endline, which took place after the end of the second academic year, we followed up with teachers and students surveyed at midline. In Delhi, one teacher was added per school to the classroom observation sample where possible. Additional teachers were added to the teacher motivation sample by offering the survey to all the teachers in our sample schools. The sampling strategy had two clear advantages:

1) It helped us target teachers and students that have been exposed to STIR for as long as possible since the timeline for the overall evaluation is relatively short. 2) The evaluations are already quite complex and this helped have a clear interpretation and narrative surrounding the results.

Delhi:

Teacher Motivation: From the list of 657 teachers surveyed at teacher motivation midline, 101 teachers dropped out of schools during the academic year and hence were not available for surveying during endline. A further 25 teachers refused to participate and 50 teachers were not available during the data collection period. Given this, the total number of teachers surveyed at teacher motivation midline was 481. These teachers formed the sample for analyses.

Classroom Observation: For classroom observations, we attempted to collect data for all 459 teachers on the Delhi midline list as well as 102 teachers we surveyed at baseline and couldn't at midline but were hopeful of covering in the last survey. A new teacher was added to each school's sample where possible. A total of 376 teachers were surveyed as part of the classroom observation endline.

Student Testing: For testing of student learning levels, all students surveyed at midline formed the potential sample at endline. Among the 1,956 students from baseline, 1,843 students were tracked and surveyed at midline. 49 students had dropped out from the schools. 45 students were absent throughout the course of the data collection, and were not found in schools during any of the five revisits.

Uttar Pradesh:

Teacher Motivation: From the 967 teachers surveyed at midline, 105 teachers were transfered and 17 retired during the course of the academic year and were hence not available for data collection. An additional 36 refused to participate in the data collection and 26 were not available through

Data includes: board and school information, grade 3 and 6 EQAO student achievements for reading, writing and mathematics, and grade 9 mathematics EQAO and OSSLT. Data excludes private schools, Education and Community Partnership Programs (ECPP), summer, night and continuing education schools.

How Are We Protecting Privacy?

Results for OnSIS and Statistics Canada variables are suppressed based on school population size to better protect student privacy. In order to achieve this additional level of protection, the Ministry has used a methodology that randomly rounds a percentage either up or down depending on school enrolment. In order to protect privacy, the ministry does not publicly report on data when there are fewer than 10 individuals represented.

* Percentages depicted as 0 may not always be 0 values as in certain situations the values have been randomly rounded down or there are no reported results at a school for the respective indicator. * Percentages depicted as 100 are not always 100, in certain situations the values have been randomly rounded up.

The information in the School Information Finder is the most current available to the Ministry of Education at this time, as reported by schools, school boards, EQAO and Statistics Canada. The information is updated as frequently as possible.

This information is also available on the Ministry of Education's School Information Finder website by individual school.

Descriptions for some of the data types can be found in our glossary.

School/school board and school authority contact information are updated and maintained by school boards and may not be the most current version. For the most recent information please visit: https://data.ontario.ca/dataset/ontario-public-school-contact-information.

These geocoded locations are based on the Allegheny County extract of Educational Names & Addresses (EdNA) via Pennsylvania Department of Education website as of April 19, 2018. Several addresses were not able to be geocoded (ex. If PO Box addresses were provided, they were not geocoded.)If viewing this description on the Western Pennsylvania Regional Data Center’s open data portal (http://www.wprdc.org), this dataset is harvested on a weekly basis from Allegheny County’s GIS data portal (http://openac.alcogis.opendata.arcgis.com/). The full metadata record for this dataset can also be found on Allegheny County’s GIS portal. You can access the metadata record and other resources on the GIS portal by clicking on the “Explore” button (and choosing the “Go to resource” option) to the right of the “ArcGIS Open Dataset” text below. Category: Education Organization: Allegheny County Department: Department of Human Services Temporal Coverage: as of April 19, 2018 Data Notes: Coordinate System: GCS_North_American_1983 Development Notes: none Other: none Related Document(s): Data Dictionary - none Frequency - Data Change: April, 19, 2018 data Frequency - Publishing: one-time Data Steward Name: See http://www.edna.ed.state.pa.us/Screens/Extracts/wfExtractEntitiesAdmin.aspx for more information. Data Steward Email: RA-DDQDataCollection@pa.gov (Data Collection Team)

The School Workforce Annual Census (SWAC) is an electronic collection of individual level data on the school workforce in local authority maintained settings in Wales. The first collection was introduced in 2019 and collects information at Nov, yearly.

Key Table Information.Table Title.States Ranked According to Relation of Public Elementary-Secondary School System Finance Amounts to $1,000 Personal Income: U.S. and State: 2012 - 2023.Table ID.GOVSTIMESERIES.GS00SS09.Survey/Program.Public Sector.Year.2024.Dataset.PUB Public Sector Annual Surveys and Census of Governments.Source.U.S. Census Bureau, Public Sector.Release Date.2025-05-01.Release Schedule.The Annual Survey of School System Finances occurs every year. Data are typically released in early May. There are approximately two years between the reference period and data release..Dataset Universe.Census of Governments - Organization (CG):The universe of this file is all federal, state, and local government units in the United States. In addition to the federal government and the 50 state governments, the Census Bureau recognizes five basic types of local governments. The government types are: County, Municipal, Township, Special District, and School District. Of these five types, three are categorized as General Purpose governments: County, municipal, and township governments are readily recognized and generally present no serious problem of classification. However, legislative provisions for school district and special district governments are diverse. These two types are categorized as Special Purpose governments. Numerous single-function and multiple-function districts, authorities, commissions, boards, and other entities, which have varying degrees of autonomy, exist in the United States. The basic pattern of these entities varies widely from state to state. Moreover, various classes of local governments within a particular state also differ in their characteristics. Refer to the Individual State Descriptions report for an overview of all government entities authorized by state.The Public Use File provides a listing of all independent government units, and dependent school districts active as of fiscal year ending June 30, 2024. The Annual Surveys of Public Employment & Payroll (EP) and State and Local Government Finances (LF):The target population consists of all 50 state governments, the District of Columbia, and a sample of local governmental units (counties, cities, townships, special districts, school districts). In years ending in '2' and '7' the entire universe is canvassed. In intervening years, a sample of the target population is surveyed. Additional details on sampling are available in the survey methodology descriptions for those years.The Annual Survey of Public Pensions (PP):The target population consists of state- and locally-administered defined benefit funds and systems of all 50 state governments, the District of Columbia, and a sample of local governmental units (counties, cities, townships, special districts, school districts). In years ending in '2' and '7' the entire universe is canvassed. In intervening years, a sample of the target population is surveyed. Additional details on sampling are available in the survey methodology descriptions for those years.The Annual Surveys of State Government Finance (SG) and State Government Tax Collections (TC):The target population consists of all 50 state governments. No local governments are included. For the purpose of Census Bureau statistics, the term "state government" refers not only to the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of a given state, but it also includes agencies, institutions, commissions, and public authorities that operate separately or somewhat autonomously from the central state government but where the state government maintains administrative or fiscal control over their activities as defined by the Census Bureau. Additional details are available in the survey methodology description.The Annual Survey of School System Finances (SS):The Annual Survey of School System Finances targets all public school systems providing elementary and/or secondary education in all 50 states and the District of Columbia..Methodology.Data Items and Other Identifying Records.Total revenue per $1000 personal incomeTotal revenue from federal sources per $1000 personal incomeTotal revenue from state sources per $1000 personal incomeTotal revenue from local sources per $1000 personal incomeTotal current spending per $1000 personal incomeCurrent spending per $1000 personal income - Instruction - TotalCurrent spending per $1000 personal income - Instruction - Salaries and wagesCurrent spending per $1000 personal income - Instruction - Employee benefitsCurrent spending per $1000 personal income - Support services - General administrationCurrent spending per $1000 personal income - Support services - School administrationDefinitions can be found by clicking on the column header in the table or by accessing the Glossary.For detailed information, see Government Finance and Employment Classification Manual..Unit(s) of Observation.The basic reporting unit is the governmental unit, defined as an organized entity which in addition to ha...

Data presented here is an extract of data published by the Scottish Government regarding historical school rolls graduated to individual school level.