Prices in US dollars per barrel of WCS oil and in Canadian dollars per gigajoule of natural gas.

In 2022/23, the government of the United Kingdom spent approximately 20 billion British pounds on the energy price guarantee policy, the most out of any other support policy announced to combat the Cost of Living crisis.

Cost of primary energy consumed 2023

Primary energy cost 2019

Primary energy cost 2020

Cost of primary energy consumed 2022

The cost of primary energy consumed in 2021

Form for duties drawback and taxes collected by insurance or guarantee for items covered by Energy Regulation No. sixty and its amendments

This dataset was collected by Jeyhun Mikayilov - a research fellow at KAPSARC.

Mexico Consumer Price Index (CPI): Non Core: Energy & Prices approved by Government: Energy data was reported at 161.457 16Dec2010-31Dec2010=100 in Jul 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 159.385 16Dec2010-31Dec2010=100 for Jun 2018. Mexico Consumer Price Index (CPI): Non Core: Energy & Prices approved by Government: Energy data is updated monthly, averaging 48.550 16Dec2010-31Dec2010=100 from Jan 1982 (Median) to Jul 2018, with 439 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 165.757 16Dec2010-31Dec2010=100 in Mar 2018 and a record low of 0.066 16Dec2010-31Dec2010=100 in Jun 1982. Mexico Consumer Price Index (CPI): Non Core: Energy & Prices approved by Government: Energy data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by National Institute of Statistics and Geography. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Mexico – Table MX.I015: Consumer Price Index: Non-Core: Second Half December 2010=100.

Central Govt Expenditure: Economic Services: Energy & Fuel data was reported at 3,473,530.422 ARS mn in 2023. This records an increase from the previous number of 1,988,616.337 ARS mn for 2022. Central Govt Expenditure: Economic Services: Energy & Fuel data is updated yearly, averaging 2,141.554 ARS mn from Dec 1980 (Median) to 2023, with 44 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3,473,530.422 ARS mn in 2023 and a record low of 0.000 ARS mn in 1980. Central Govt Expenditure: Economic Services: Energy & Fuel data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Ministry of Treasury. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Argentina – Table AR.F014: Government Expenditure: Central: Current Price.

About the Project The KAPSARC Energy Model of China (KEM China) project began in 2014 to study energy and environmental issues in China. KEM China has been developed to understand China’s energy economy and fuel mix, how they are impacted by government intervention, as well as their interaction with global markets. It is a modular integrated mixed-complementarity problem model that optimizes supply decisions, minimizing fuel and technology costs, while taking into account the effect of government regulation on prices and the environment.Key PointsWhen energy sectors transition from government-controlled to market-driven systems, the legacy regulatory instruments can create unintended market distortions and lead to higher costs. In China, the most notable regulatory throwback is ceilings on electricity prices that generators can charge utilities, which are specified by plant type and region. We built a mixed complementarity model calibrated to 2012 data to examine the impact of these price caps on the electricity and coal sectors. Our study highlights the following major findings: Capped on-grid tariffs incentivize market concentration and vertical integration so that generators can cross-subsidize power plants, ensure an uninterrupted supply of fuel and reduce the impact of volatility in fuel prices. Tight price caps can cause the system to deviate from the least-cost capacity and fuel mix. In 2012, this resulted in an additional annual cost of at least 45 billion RMB, or 4 percent of China’s total power system cost. The government also had to subsidize some of the losses, which indicates that this regulatory design is not responsive to market realities. Price constraints can impact the outcomes of other policy initiatives causing them to veer from intended goals. In the case of China, according to our modeling, greater installed wind capacity does not have a significant impact on the amount of coal consumed. Also, abolishing restrictive tariff caps on coal-fired generation does not increase coal use because the utilization rate of peak-shaving coal plants drops. We also estimate, using the model, subsidies required for a range of wind capacity additions to China’s power generation mix and find that the feed-in tariff could have been less generous.

Russia Avg Producer Price: OKPD2: Electricity: Distributed to Consumers: Government data was reported at 4,886.340 RUB/MWh in Jan 2019. This records a decrease from the previous number of 5,007.490 RUB/MWh for Dec 2018. Russia Avg Producer Price: OKPD2: Electricity: Distributed to Consumers: Government data is updated monthly, averaging 4,851.100 RUB/MWh from Jan 2017 (Median) to Jan 2019, with 25 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 5,118.740 RUB/MWh in Oct 2017 and a record low of 4,445.720 RUB/MWh in Feb 2017. Russia Avg Producer Price: OKPD2: Electricity: Distributed to Consumers: Government data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal State Statistics Service. The data is categorized under Russia Premium Database’s Prices – Table RU.PB024: Average Producer Price: Electricity and Thermal Energy.

Multi-stage stratified random sample of persons 15 years old and older.