10 datasets found
  1. M

    Equity Considerations for Place-Based Advocacy and Decisions in the Twin...

    • gisdata.mn.gov
    ags_mapserver, fgdb +4
    Updated Nov 22, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Metropolitan Council (2024). Equity Considerations for Place-Based Advocacy and Decisions in the Twin Cities Region [Dataset]. https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metc-society-equity-considerations
    Explore at:
    xlsx, html, shp, ags_mapserver, fgdb, gpkgAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 22, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Metropolitan Council
    Area covered
    Twin Cities
    Description

    This dataset provides equity-relevant characteristics for each census tract in the Twin Cities region. Formerly known as the Areas of Concentrated Poverty dataset, it has been greatly expanded to provide a more nuanced portrait of neighborhoods, with data on: demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (including multiple income levels); racial/ethnic/cultural groups; historical data on discriminatory practices; facets of housing markets; land use, environment/climate, amenities, and employment/commuting patterns. Our intention is to call attention to broader patterns of economic segregation and their root causes, and to show that census tracts are much more multifaceted than a narrow focus on poverty rates would imply.

    For more background on this file, please see our website ( https://metrocouncil.org/research/place-basedequity ) -- in particular, the User Guide.

  2. Community Life Survey 2020/21

    • gov.uk
    • s3.amazonaws.com
    Updated Jul 1, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (2022). Community Life Survey 2020/21 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-life-survey-202021
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 1, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
    Description

    Background

    Released: 29 July 2021

    Geographic Coverage: England

    This release provides estimates on a number of measures covering social cohesion, community engagement and social action over the period of April 2020 to March 2021. The survey ran over the course of a year, recording respondents’ answers consistently over the year during different periods of lockdown measures. It is therefore likely that COVID-19 pandemic impacted respondent’s behaviours and responses, although we can not state that any change is caused purely because of this.

    The Community Life Survey is a nationally representative annual survey of adults (16+) in England that aims to track the latest trends and developments across areas that are key to encouraging social action and empowering communities.

    The survey moved from a face-to-face mode to an online (with paper mode for those who are not digitally engaged) in 2016/17. The results included in the release are based on online/paper completes only, covering the eight years from 2013/14, when this method was first tested, to 2020/21.

    Differences between groups are only reported on in this publication where they are statistically significant i.e. where we can be confident that the differences seen in our sampled respondents reflect the population.

    Responsible statistician: Aleister Skinner

    Statistical enquiries: evidence@dcms.gov.uk, @DCMSInsight

    Headline Estimates

    Estimates from the 2020/21 Community Life Survey show that among adults (16+) in England:

    • Most adults (95%) agreed that if they needed help there are people who would be there for them.

    • 66% of respondents met up in person with friends or family at least once a week, a significant decrease from 2019/20 (74%).

    • The proportion of adults reporting they felt lonely often/always remained similar to 2019/20 at 6%.

    • Measures for life satisfaction, happiness and self-worth have decreased from 2019/20.

    • 79% of respondents agree that they were satisfied with their local area as a place to live, an increase from 2019/20 (76%).

    • 65% of respondents agreed that people in their neighbourhood pull together to improve their neighbourhood; this was higher than in 2019/20 (59%).

    • 41% of respondents have taken part in civic participation, 19% in civic consultation, and 7% in civic activism.

    • 27% of respondents agreed that they could personally influence decisions in their local areas.

    • There was a decrease in the proportion of people giving to charitable causes. 63% of respondents reported having given to charitable causes in the last 4 weeks (at the time of responding to the survey). This was lower than in 2019/20 where 75% of respondents reported doing so and the lowest since the Community Life Survey began in 2013/14.

    • There was a decrease in the proportion of people formally volunteering. 17% of respondents reported formally volunteering at least once a month, the lowest recorded participation rate since data collection in the Community Life Survey.

    • There was an increase in the proportion of people informally volunteering. 33% of respondents had volunteered informally at least once a month, the highest percentage on record in the Community Life Survey.

    Chapters

    1. Identity and Social Network

    2. Wellbeing and Loneliness

    3. Neighbourhood and Community

    4. Civic Engagement and Social Action

    5. Volunteering and Charitable Giving

    6. Annexes

    Notes

    • There are likely to be interactions between different demographics reported in this publication. For example, ethnic groups have different age and regional profiles. This report considers each demographic characteristic individually, so differences cited here cannot necessarily be attributed directly to the characteristic being described.
    • The

  3. Community Life Survey 2019/20

    • gov.uk
    Updated Jul 14, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (2020). Community Life Survey 2019/20 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/community-life-survey-201920
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
    Description

    Background

    The Community Life Survey is a household self-completion survey of adults aged 16+ in England. The survey is a key evidence source on social cohesion, community engagement and social action.

    This report summarises the results from the 2019/20 survey, which ran from April 2019 to March 2020. In 2016/17, the survey discontinued face-to-face collection and moved fully to a ‘push to web’ approach.

    The majority of the fieldwork took place prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Further information on the impact the pandemic may have had on our estimates is available in Annex B.

    This nationally representative survey provides statistics on behaviours and attitudes to inform policy and action in these areas. The survey provides data of value to a range of users, including government departments, public bodies, those working in the voluntary and charity sectors and the public.

    Responsible statistician: Alistair Rice

    Statistical enquiries: evidence@dcms.gov.uk, @DCMSInsight

    Media enquiries: 020 7211 2210

    Date: 14th July 2020

    Headline Estimates

    Estimates from the 2019-20 Community Life Survey show that among adults (16+) in England:

    • 23% took part in formal volunteering at least once a month.
    • 37% took part in formal volunteering at least once in the last year.

    • 75% have to charitable causes in the last 4 weeks.
    • Of which, £24 was the average donation given.

    • 27% felt able to influence decision affecting their local area.
    • 53% wanted to be more involved in local decision making.

    • 76% were satisfied with their local area as a place to live.
    • 82% agreed their area was a place where people from different backgrounds get on well together.

    • 63% felt they belonged to their immediate neighbourhood.
    • 84% felt they belonged to Britain.

    • 74% met up in person with family or friends once a week or more.
    • 6% said they felt lonely often or always.

    Chapters

    1. Identity and Social Networks

    2. Wellbeing and Loneliness

    3. Neighbourhood and Community

    4. Civic Engagement and Social Action

    5. Volunteering and Charitable Giving

    6. Annexes

    Notes

    • There are likely to be interactions between different demographics reported in this publication. For example, ethnic groups have different age and regional profiles. This report considers each demographic characteristic individually, so differences cited here cannot necessarily be attributed directly to the characteristic being described.
    • The 2014/15 and 2015/16 survey had a smaller overall sample size than other years reported in this report so figures for these years may be less reliable.
    • Small sample sizes for some demographic characteristics (such as some ethnic minority groups) presented in this report mean we are less able to detect significant differences between groups.
    • All results summarised in this report are from the ‘push to web’ methodology. Respondents can choose to complete the survey online or use a paper questionnaire. Not all questions are included in the paper version of the questionnaire.
    • 95% confidence intervals have been used throughout the report. For further explanation and for definitions of terms please refer to Annex A
    • Differences between groups are only reported on in this publication where they are statistically significant i.e. where we can be confident that the differences seen in our sampled respondents reflect the population. Further information on this approach is provided in "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/community-life-survey-201920-annexes/annex-a-terms-and-definitions">

  4. p

    Population and Housing Census 2011 - Cook Island

    • microdata.pacificdata.org
    Updated Jul 14, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cook Islands Statistics Office (2016). Population and Housing Census 2011 - Cook Island [Dataset]. https://microdata.pacificdata.org/index.php/catalog/7
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Cook Islands Statistics Office
    Time period covered
    2011
    Area covered
    Cook Islands
    Description

    Abstract

    The Census provides a unique source of detailed demographic, social and economic data relating to the entire population at a single point in time. The most fundamental questions it will answer concern the size and distribution of the entire population, the extent to which men and women participate in the economy, and the nature of housing and household facilities.

    Our country is constantly changing and information collected will allow policy planners to measure the developments of our society and to make decisions about future needs of our communities. Emphasis for the CPD is on renewable energy. Government has set itself policy goals that by 2015, 50 percent of Cook Islands electricity demand will be provided by renewable energy and 100 percent in 2020. Culture has also been identified as a priority of Government.

    The topic content of the 2011 Census has been driven principally by the demands and requirements of users of census statistics, the evaluation of the 2006 Census, and the priorities of the Government as stated in its manifesto, and the advice and guidance of organisations with experience of similar operations. These have been determined by extensive consultations with various Ministries of government and non government organizations (NGO).

    The topics proposed for the census are those most needed by the major users of census information and questions have been devised to produce reliable and accurate data. In each case, no other comparable and accessible source of the information is available in combination with other items in the census.

    In assessing which topics should be included in the census, Statistics Office has had to consider a number of factors. The criteria for evaluating the strength of users' requirements for information were that:

    · there should be a clearly demonstrated and significant need · the information collected was of major national importance · users' requirements could not adequately be met by information from other sources · there should be a requirement for multivariate analysis (that is the ability to cross-analyze one variable against other), and · there should be consideration of the ability for comparison with the 2006 Census wherever possible

    Geographic coverage

    National coverage.

    Analysis unit

    -Household -Individual.

    Universe

    A Dwelling Questionnaire must be completed for every occupied dwelling as at midnight on Census Night. A Personal Questionnaire must be completed for each and every man, woman and child alive at midnight on Census Night within the geographical boundaries of the Cook Islands, excluding those persons on foreign vessels, yachts and aircraft flying through or stopping temporarily (transit).

    Kind of data

    Census/enumeration data [cen]

    Mode of data collection

    Face-to-face [f2f]

    Research instrument

    The questionnaire which was published in English, can be found as External Resources.

    The questionnaire of the early Cook Islands censuses was limited; they consisted oh head counts only. With the passage of time, the topics covered by the questionnaires expanded. Gradually, questions on sex, age, marital status, religion, education, employment, etc have been included. Questions on unpaid work and income earned were included for the first time in the 1996 Census. In the 2011 Census, questions on renewable energy and culture was included.

    The questionnaire of the 2011 Census of Cook Islands is divided into 2 main forms: -Dwelling form: which covers topics like: Household characteristics, water supply, energy, toilet, tradition, communication & technology, waste management, involvment in agriculture, fishing, farming, equipment, transport. -Personal form: which covers topics like: Individual characteristics, disability, literacy and language, information & technology, education, economic activity, income, narcotics, cultural activities and fertility.

    SELECTION OF TOPICS AND QUESTIONS: The topic content of the 2011 Census has been driven principally by the demands and requirements of users of census statistics, the evaluation of the 2006 Census, and the priority of government as stated in this Governments Manifesto, and the advice and guidance of organizations with experience of similar operations. These have been determined by extensive consultation with various Ministries of government and NGO's. Emphasis for this Census was on Renewable Energy and Cultural Statistics. Government had set itself a policy goal that 50 percent of its electricity demands to be provided by renewable energy in 2015 and 100 percent in 2020.

    The 2011 Census questionnaire is designed to be machine readable that is questionnaires will be scanned.

  5. d

    Nebulocracy Theory: The Pinnacle of Political Science and the World's Most...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Oct 29, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Daniel Kasper (Theoretical Physicist)Hyperintelligence Researchers, The Omega Team (2025). Nebulocracy Theory: The Pinnacle of Political Science and the World's Most Perfect, Feasible, and Optimally Designed Government System [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/LTKBSH
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 29, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Daniel Kasper (Theoretical Physicist)Hyperintelligence Researchers, The Omega Team
    Description

    The "Nebulocracy: Semi-Direct Democratic Government System Architecture" introduces a visionary and intricate framework for a new form of governance known as Nebulocracy. This system is designed to seamlessly integrate advanced technology, robust ethical frameworks, and extensive citizen participation, aiming to create a more responsive, adaptable, and principled form of democracy. The research delves into the complex and multi-layered structure of Nebulocracy, which is intended to address the intricacies of modern governance while adhering to core ethical principles. At the heart of Nebulocracy lie five core principles that guide its entire structure and operation. The first principle is Ethical Objectivism, which posits that there are universal ethical truths that can be discovered and applied to governance. This principle serves as the foundation of the system's moral framework, ensuring that decisions are grounded in objective ethical standards. The second principle, Value Integration, recognizes the importance of incorporating the diverse subjective values of citizens into the governance process. This ensures that the system remains responsive to the evolving needs and beliefs of the population, balancing universal ethical principles with individual and cultural perspectives. The third principle, Adaptive Governance, acknowledges the rapidly changing nature of the world and designs the system to evolve and adapt to new challenges, technological advancements, and societal needs. This adaptability ensures that Nebulocracy remains relevant and effective over time. The fourth principle, Citizen Participation, emphasizes the importance of direct and continuous citizen involvement in the governance process. Unlike traditional representative democracies, where citizen involvement is often limited to periodic voting, Nebulocracy provides multiple channels for citizens to engage in decision-making processes, contribute their ideas, and shape the direction of governance. The fifth principle, Specialized Governance, recognizes that effective governance in a complex world requires specialized knowledge and expertise. Therefore, Nebulocracy divides governance into distinct branches, each focused on specific domains, to ensure that decisions are made with a deep understanding of relevant issues. The Axiological Framework is a crucial component of Nebulocracy, serving as the supreme governing body that ensures all governmental actions align with ethical principles and societal values. This framework consists of several interrelated elements, including the Moral Graph, Value Cards, the Ethical Values Integration System (EVIS), and the Axiological Oversight Council (AOC). The Moral Graph is a dynamic, multidimensional representation of the ethical landscape of society, visually mapping out how different values interact, their relative importance, and their application in various contexts. This graph is continuously updated based on new ethical insights, empirical data, and citizen input, ensuring that it remains current and representative. Value Cards are detailed articulations of specific values, principles, or ethical considerations that citizens, experts, and AI systems can propose. These cards are then evaluated and potentially integrated into the Moral Graph, allowing for a granular and nuanced understanding of ethical concepts. The Ethical Values Integration System (EVIS) is an advanced AI system that manages the Moral Graph and Value Cards, using sophisticated algorithms to process ethical data, update the Moral Graph, and provide real-time ethical analysis for decision-making processes across all branches of government. The Axiological Oversight Council (AOC) is an independent body of ethicists, philosophers, scientists, and cultural representatives that oversees the operation of EVIS and the overall ethical integrity of the government. This council reviews and validates new Value Cards, audits the Moral Graph for consistency and accuracy, and provides guidance on complex ethical issues. Additionally, the Peoples, Wants, Desires, Interests Sovereign Council (PWDISC) focuses on understanding and representing the diverse needs, aspirations, and interests of the citizenry, serving as a bridge between the ethical framework and the lived experiences of people. The Sovereign People's Health and Safety Council is dedicated to ensuring the physical and mental well-being of citizens, integrating health and safety considerations into all aspects of governance. The People's Enquiry Inquisition Branch On Needs Wants Desires Interests Agency serves as a direct channel for citizens to express their needs, wants, desires, and interests, conducting regular surveys, holding public forums, and using AI-assisted analysis to understand and articulate the will of the people. The General Government Advisors Agency Council brings together advisors from various fields to provide comprehensive guidance to all branches of...

  6. s

    Population of England and Wales

    • ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk
    csv
    Updated May 21, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Race Disparity Unit (2024). Population of England and Wales [Dataset]. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/national-and-regional-populations/population-of-england-and-wales/latest/
    Explore at:
    csv(17 KB)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 21, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Race Disparity Unit
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Wales, England
    Description

    According to the 2021 Census, 81.7% of the population of England and Wales was white, 9.3% Asian, 4.0% black, 2.9% mixed and 2.1% from other ethnic groups.

  7. g

    Cultural changes in the Netherlands 1983 - CV'83

    • datasearch.gesis.org
    • ssh.datastations.nl
    Updated Jan 23, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Becker, J.W. (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, SCP * Den Haag (primary investigator)) DAI=info:eu-repo/dai/nl/068409176 (2020). Cultural changes in the Netherlands 1983 - CV'83 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17026/dans-xn9-nwph
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 23, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    DANS (Data Archiving and Networked Services)
    Authors
    Becker, J.W. (Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, SCP * Den Haag (primary investigator)) DAI=info:eu-repo/dai/nl/068409176
    Area covered
    Netherlands
    Description

    Trend study of changes in general opinions and attitudes of ( parts of ) the Dutch population.

    Media exposure to news and politics / job satisfaction / prosperity / government duties on education, housing, pollution, defence expenditures, art-subsidies / feeling lonely, having fears / worrying about politics, money, health, future, unemployment, family / measures in case of firms suffering losses / income satisfaction / sufficiency of social security / social rights / church and society / religious beliefs / opinions on moral issues, war, energy, environmental and nuclear problems / ( dis- )approval of actions against government / ( in- )tolerance / influential persons and organizations in decisions of national importance / who should actually have influence / opinions on marriage and family affairs / freedom of religious doings / participation in socio-political group activities / preparedness to reduction of working hours / allocation of scarce housing according to type of person / crime and punishment / preference of economization measures in policy sectors / role of personal and social qualities in case of dismissal or promotion / opinions on modes of cohabitation, military affairs / sex-role differences / problems with household work. Background variables: basic characteristics/ residence/ household characteristics/ occupation/employment/ income/capital assets/ education/ politics/ religion/ readership, mass media, and 'cultural' exposure/ organizational membership.

    The data- and documentation files of this dataset can be downloaded via the option Data Files.

  8. u

    Family lives and the environment: Negotiating meanings and practices in...

    • datacatalogue.ukdataservice.ac.uk
    Updated Jul 14, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Boddy, J, University of Sussex; Phoenix, A, UCL Institute of Education; Walker, C, UCL Institute of Education (2017). Family lives and the environment: Negotiating meanings and practices in India and the UK, 2011-2015 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-852492
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 14, 2017
    Authors
    Boddy, J, University of Sussex; Phoenix, A, UCL Institute of Education; Walker, C, UCL Institute of Education
    Area covered
    India, United Kingdom
    Description

    The Family Lives and the Environment project was funded as part of the National Centre for Research Methods NOVELLA Node (www.novella.ac.uk) (PI: Ann Phoenix) and included a linked PhD studentship (Catherine Walker). The overall aim of the study was to improve understanding of the diversity and negotiated complexity of families’ lives in relationship with their environments, with regard to the meanings of ‘environment’ in everyday family lives and family practices. After a first stage of secondary analysis of eight family case studies drawn from the qualitative subsample of the Young Lives study in Andhra Pradesh/Telangana (www.younglives.org.uk), the second stage of the research involved new data collection with 24 families with diverse economic, social, cultural and demographic profiles in India (Andhra Pradesh/Telangana) and in the UK (southern England). The research involved a volunteer sample of families, recruited through school Years 7 and 8 (children aged 11-14), selecting schools in urban and rural locations and on the basis of school characteristics (including state/government and fee-paying schools in both countries).

    We visited each family three times over a period of approximately two weeks (although timing varied depending on families’ availability):

    Visit 1 involved a family group interview with all household members who wished to participate, and incorporated a cognitive mapping exercise to explore meanings of environment in families’ lives. Families were given disposable cameras (one each for the main caregiver and the focal young person, and a third camera for the rest of the family) and took photos over seven days to show what was important in their everyday lives and environments.

    Visit 2 involved individual interviews with the caregiver and young person, and a walking or driving interview in their local area involving the caregiver, young person, and anyone else in the family who wanted to come.

    Visit 3 involved photo elicitation interviews. The main caregiver and young person were interviewed individually, and each selected five of their pictures to discuss with the rest of the family, while other family members separately chose three photos from the third camera. Afterwards, the family group were interviewed together, discussing the photos selected and choosing three which they agreed best conveyed what was important in their everyday lives.

    Interviews were transcribed and, where necessary, translated into English. Overall, eighteen sets of family transcripts have been archived. These transcripts are of research activities carried out with families in urban India (6), rural India (3), rural UK (4) and urban UK (5). The ‘overview of research activities’ document provides a list of research activities carried out with each family. To protect confidentiality, visual materials (maps, photographs) and audio recordings have not been archived. Where data have not been archived (e.g., some school group activities, and family transcripts for cases not listed here) this is because of risk of identifiability.

    The Family Lives and the Environment project (PI: Janet Boddy) was funded as part of the National Centre for Research Methods NOVELLA Node (www.novella.ac.uk) (PI: Ann Phoenix) and included a linked PhD studentship (Catherine Walker). The overall aim of the study was to improve understanding of the diversity and negotiated complexity of families’ lives in relationship with their environments, with regard to the meanings of ‘environment’ in everyday family lives and family practices. After a first stage of secondary analysis of eight family case studies drawn from the qualitative subsample of the Young Lives study in Andhra Pradesh/Telangana (www.younglives.org.uk), the second stage of the research involved new data collection with 24 families with diverse economic, social, cultural and demographic profiles in India (Andhra Pradesh/Telangana) and in the UK (southern England). The research involved a volunteer sample of families, recruited through school Years 7 and 8 (children aged 11-14), selecting schools in urban and rural locations and on the basis of school characteristics (including state/government and fee-paying schools in both countries).

    The NOVELLA NCRM research node as a whole was concerned with the everyday habitual practices of families. These are frequently taken for granted. Since people’s understanding of what they do (their everyday practices) is not necessarily what they actually do, it might seem that what they say is of little interest to policymakers and practitioners. Yet, 'disconnections' between people's understanding and action tells us about their identities, values and possible future actions. Family practices are of particular interest since orientation to the social world and what people do are negotiated within families.

  9. D

    Data from: A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • eprints.soton.ac.uk
    • +4more
    Updated Dec 3, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Snaddon, Jake L.; Jones, Lizzie; Ingwall-King, Lisa; Ball, Jennifer; Holland, Robert A.; Sykes, Tim; Taylor, Gail; Peh, Kelvin S. -H. (2019). A place-based participatory mapping approach for assessing cultural ecosystem services in urban green space [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.427c0pr
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2019
    Authors
    Snaddon, Jake L.; Jones, Lizzie; Ingwall-King, Lisa; Ball, Jennifer; Holland, Robert A.; Sykes, Tim; Taylor, Gail; Peh, Kelvin S. -H.
    Description
    1. Cultural Ecosystem Services (CES) encompass a range of social, cultural and health benefits to local communities, for example recreation, spirituality, a sense of place and local identity. However, these complex and place-specific CES are often overlooked in rapid land management decisions and assessed using broad, top–down approaches. 2. We use the Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-based Assessment (TESSA) to examine a novel approach to rapid assessment of local CES provision using inductive, participatory methods. We combined free-listing and participatory geographic information systems (GIS) techniques to quantify and map perceptions of current CES provision of an urban green space. The results were then statistically compared with those of a proposed alternative scenario with the aim to inform future decision-making. 3. By identifying changes in the spatial hotspots of CES in our study area, we revealed a spatially-specific shift toward positive sentiment regarding several CES under the alternative state with variance across demographic and stakeholder groups. Response aggregations in areas of proposed development reveal previously unknown stakeholder preferences to local decision-makers and highlight potential trade-offs for conservation management. Free-listed responses revealed deeper insight into personal opinion and context. 4. This work serves as a useful case study on how the perceptions and opinions of local people regarding local CES could be accounted for in the future planning of an urban greenspace and how thorough analysis of CES provision is important to fully-inform local-scale conservation and planning for the mutual benefit of local communities and nature.
  10. Socio-demographic characteristics of herd owners N = 204.

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Geoffrey Otieno Muga; Washington Onyango-Ouma; Rosemary Sang; Hippolyte Affognon (2023). Socio-demographic characteristics of herd owners N = 204. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009166.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 12, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Geoffrey Otieno Muga; Washington Onyango-Ouma; Rosemary Sang; Hippolyte Affognon
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Socio-demographic characteristics of herd owners N = 204.

  11. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Metropolitan Council (2024). Equity Considerations for Place-Based Advocacy and Decisions in the Twin Cities Region [Dataset]. https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metc-society-equity-considerations

Equity Considerations for Place-Based Advocacy and Decisions in the Twin Cities Region

Explore at:
xlsx, html, shp, ags_mapserver, fgdb, gpkgAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Nov 22, 2024
Dataset provided by
Metropolitan Council
Area covered
Twin Cities
Description

This dataset provides equity-relevant characteristics for each census tract in the Twin Cities region. Formerly known as the Areas of Concentrated Poverty dataset, it has been greatly expanded to provide a more nuanced portrait of neighborhoods, with data on: demographic and socioeconomic characteristics (including multiple income levels); racial/ethnic/cultural groups; historical data on discriminatory practices; facets of housing markets; land use, environment/climate, amenities, and employment/commuting patterns. Our intention is to call attention to broader patterns of economic segregation and their root causes, and to show that census tracts are much more multifaceted than a narrow focus on poverty rates would imply.

For more background on this file, please see our website ( https://metrocouncil.org/research/place-basedequity ) -- in particular, the User Guide.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu