100+ datasets found
  1. Open central government websites - February 2012

    • gov.uk
    Updated Jul 9, 2013
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cabinet Office (2013). Open central government websites - February 2012 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-central-government-websites-february-2012
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 9, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Cabinet Office
    Description

    Background

    Information was reported as correct by central government departments at 29 February 2012.

    In its Structural Reform plan, the Cabinet Office committed to begin quarterly publication of the number of open websites starting in financial year 2011.

    Definition of a website

    The definition used of a website is a user-centric one. Something is counted as a separate website if it is active and either has a separate domain name or, when as a subdomain, the user cannot move freely between the subsite and parent site and there is no family likeness in the design. In other words, if the user experiences it as a separate site in their normal uses of browsing, search and interaction, it is counted as one.

    Definition of a closed website

    A website is considered closed when it ceases to be actively funded, run and managed by central government, either by packaging information and putting it in the right place for the intended audience on another website or digital channel, or by a third party taking and managing it and bearing the cost. Where appropriate, domains stay operational in order to redirect users to the http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/" class="govuk-link">UK Government Website Archive.

    Definition of the exemption process

    The GOV.UK exemption process began with a web rationalisation of the government’s Internet estate to reduce the number of obsolete websites and to establish the scale of the websites that the government owns.

    Exclusions from the central government list

    Not included in the number or list are websites of public corporations as listed on the Office for National Statistics website, partnerships more than half-funded by private sector, charities and national museums. Specialist closed audience functions, such as the BIS Research Councils, BIS Sector Skills Councils and Industrial Training Boards, and the Defra Levy Boards and their websites, are not included in this data. The Ministry of Defence conducted their own rationalisation of MOD and the armed forces sites as an integral part of the Website Review; military sites belonging to a particular service are excluded from this dataset. Finally, those public bodies set up by Parliament and reporting directly to the Speaker’s Committee and only reporting through a ministerial government department for the purposes of enaction of legislation are also excluded (for example, the Electoral Commission and IPSA).

    Inclusion under department name

    Websites are listed under the department name for which the minister in HMG has responsibility, either directly through their departmental activities, or indirectly through being the minister reporting to Parliament for independent bodies set up by statute.

    List of open websites

    For re-usability, these are provided as Excel and CSV files.

  2. d

    NYC.gov Web Analytics

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • +3more
    Updated Sep 30, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.cityofnewyork.us (2022). NYC.gov Web Analytics [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/nyc-gov-web-analytics
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 30, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    data.cityofnewyork.us
    Area covered
    New York
    Description

    Web traffic statistics for the top 2000 most visited pages on nyc.gov by month.

  3. O

    Lobbyist Clients

    • data.oaklandca.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Jun 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Oakland (2025). Lobbyist Clients [Dataset]. https://data.oaklandca.gov/City-Government/Lobbyist-Clients/ss9a-d595
    Explore at:
    application/rdfxml, json, application/rssxml, xml, csv, tsvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 8, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    City of Oakland
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset includes the client information disclosed by lobbyists in Quarterly Lobbyist Activity Reports submitted to the City of Oakland. The dataset only includes data from reports submitted electronically. The data is current as of the last modified date on this dataset. To see complete reports visit the Public Lobbyist Dashboard and Data Portal at: https://apps.oaklandca.gov/pec/Lobbyist_Dashboard.aspx

  4. Open central government websites – January 2014

    • gov.uk
    Updated Jan 31, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cabinet Office (2014). Open central government websites – January 2014 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-central-government-websites-january-2014
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 31, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Cabinet Office
    Description

    Number and list of central government open websites – 455 as at 31 December 2013.

    The Cabinet Office committed to begin quarterly publication of the number of open websites starting in the financial year 2011.

    Definition of a website

    The definition used is a user-centric one. Something is counted as a separate website if it is active and either has a separate domain name or, when as a subdomain, the user cannot move freely between the subsite and parent site and there is no family likeness in the design. In other words, if the user experiences it as a separate site in their normal uses of browsing, search and interaction, it is counted as one.

    Definition of a closed website

    A website is considered closed when it ceases to be actively funded, run and managed by central government, either by packaging information and putting it in the right place for the intended audience on another website or digital channel, or by a third party taking and managing it and bearing the cost. Where appropriate, domains stay operational in order to redirect users to the http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/" class="govuk-link">UK Government Website Archive.

    Definition of the exemption process

    The GOV.UK exemption process began with a web rationalisation of the government’s internet estate to reduce the number of obsolete websites and to establish the scale of the websites that the government owns.

    Exclusions from the central government list

    Not included in the number or list are:

    • websites of public corporations as listed on the http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm%3A77-329008" class="govuk-link">Office for National Statistics website partnerships more than half-funded by private sector
    • charities and national museums
    • specialist closed audience functions, such as the BIS Research Councils, BIS Sector Skills Councils and Industrial Training Boards, and the Defra Levy Boards and their websites

    Finally, those public bodies set up by Parliament and reporting directly to the Speaker’s Committee are also excluded (for example, the Electoral Commission and IPSA).

    As agreed in the quarterly report of February 2013, the following sites have been included in the list:

    • ‘.independent’ sites
    • National parks

    Inclusion under department name

    Websites are listed under the department name for which the government minister has responsibility, either directly through their departmental activities, or indirectly through being the minister reporting to Parliament for independent bodies set up by statute.

    January 2014 report

    Government website domains have been procured from as early as the 1990s and at this time, there was no requirement upon government departments to retain a formal record of ownership. With staff changes and new departments formed, it became apparent that departments did not have a complete view of all sites in their estate.

    Government Digital Service (GDS) has worked closely with these departments to identify legacy websites which we were not originally aware of, by going through the complete list of gov.uk domains managed by Cabinet Office, under the second level domain (SLD), gov.uk. A full list of gov.uk domains can be viewed here. As well as websites on the gov.uk SLD, we had found that there are a number of legacy websites owned by departments under a .org.uk or co.uk SLD. Because we do not own these SLDs, information on whether a department has ownership was not so easily accessible, but a strong working relationship with department leads has since helped to identify the majority of these sites.

    Previously, the Ministry of Defence conducted their own rationalisation of MOD and the armed forces sites. At the beginning of this report, we agreed to include these sites to ensure a consistent approach.

    Since the last report of Oct 2013, 19 websites have closed and 18 have migrated to the governments website, GOV.UK. As government websites migrate to GOV.UK, the responsibility for reporting a department’s content will become an overall GOV.UK reporting

  5. Datasets obtained from the Brazilian Federal Government's Open Data Portal -...

    • figshare.com
    zip
    Updated Sep 20, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gyslla de Vasconcelos; Flavia Bernardini; Jose Viterbo (2024). Datasets obtained from the Brazilian Federal Government's Open Data Portal - dados.gov for application in process mining tools [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25514884.v5
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Gyslla de Vasconcelos; Flavia Bernardini; Jose Viterbo
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This is a study to assess the application of process mining techniques on data from the Brazilian public services, made available on open data portals, aiming to identify bottlenecks and improvement opportunities in government processes. The datasets were obtained from the Brazilian Federal Government's Open Data Portal: dados.govCategorization:(1) event log(2) there is a complete date(3) list of data or information table(4) documents(5) no file founded(6) link to another portalLink of brasilian portal: https://dados.gov.br/homeList of content made available:open-data-sample.zip: all the files obtained from the representative sample of the studyopen-data-sample.xls: table categorizing the datasets obtained and classifying them as relevant for testing in the process mining toolsdataset137.csv: dataset with undergraduate degree records tested in the Disco, Celonis and ProM toolsdataset258.csv: dataset with software registration requests tested in the Disco, Celonis and ProM toolsdataset356.csv: dataset with public tender inspector registrations tested in the Disco, Celonis and ProM tools

  6. O

    Access to public assets on data.ct.gov by month

    • data.ct.gov
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Jun 23, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Access to public assets on data.ct.gov by month [Dataset]. https://data.ct.gov/Government/Access-to-public-assets-on-data-ct-gov-by-month/rudp-a8ae
    Explore at:
    csv, application/rdfxml, xml, tsv, application/rssxml, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 23, 2025
    License

    U.S. Government Workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Connecticut
    Description

    This dataset provides information about access to public assets on the CT Open Data Portal by day. Types of access include:

    -Grid view -Primer page view -Download -API read -Story page view -Visualization page view

    It includes assets that meet the following criteria:

    -Published on the data.ct.gov domain -Public -Official (ie published by a registered user) -Not a derived view

  7. Government Portal - Mobile Services

    • data.gov.tw
    json
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ministry of Digital Affairs, Government Portal - Mobile Services [Dataset]. https://data.gov.tw/en/datasets/22110
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Ministry of Digital Affairshttps://moda.gov.tw/
    License

    https://data.gov.tw/licensehttps://data.gov.tw/license

    Description

    Provide the latest information and links to the installation programs for central, local, and state-owned mobile devices.

  8. Data.gov CKAN API

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    • +3more
    Updated Nov 10, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data.gov (2020). Data.gov CKAN API [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-gov-ckan-api
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 10, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Data.govhttps://data.gov/
    Description

    The data.gov catalog is powered by CKAN, a powerful open source data platform that includes a robust API. Please be aware that data.gov and the data.gov CKAN API only contain metadata about datasets. This metadata includes URLs and descriptions of datasets, but it does not include the actual data within each dataset.

  9. W

    A-Z list of government sites

    • cloud.csiss.gmu.edu
    • data.gov.au
    • +1more
    csv
    Updated Dec 13, 2019
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Australia (2019). A-Z list of government sites [Dataset]. https://cloud.csiss.gmu.edu/uddi/dataset/a-z-list-of-government-sites
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 13, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    Australia
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains a machine readable version of the A-Z list of government sites from Australia.gov.au. The list contains websites from across all Australian jurisdictions.

    The dataset is updated on a monthly basis.

  10. g

    Statistics of the Transparency and Open Government web portal | gimi9.com

    • gimi9.com
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics of the Transparency and Open Government web portal | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/eu_b050ce30347d1031d79052b4c5e4c14f7388fdfa/
    Explore at:
    License

    Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The files contain the statistical information of the Transparency and Government web portal open since March 7, 2016. The information is updated quarterly. Specifically, the data per month and totals of the following parameters are offered:

  11. User-centered Usability Analysis of 41 Open Government Data Portals

    • zenodo.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    bin
    Updated May 28, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anastasija Nikiforova; Anastasija Nikiforova (2021). User-centered Usability Analysis of 41 Open Government Data Portals [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4022573
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 28, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Anastasija Nikiforova; Anastasija Nikiforova
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The data were collected during the user-centered analysis of usability of 41 open government data portals including EU27, applying a common methodology to them, considering aspects such as specification of open data set, feedback and requests, further broken down into 14 sub-criteria. Each aspect was assessed using a three-level Likert scale (fulfilled - 3, partially fulfilled - 2, and unfulfilled – 1), that belongs to the acceptability tasks. This dataset summarises a total of 1640 protocols obtained during the analysis of the selected portals carried out by 40 participants, who were selected on a voluntary basis. This is complemented with 4 summaries of these protocols, which include calculated average scores by category, aspect and country. These data allow comparative analysis of the national open data portals, help to find the key challenges that can negatively impact users’ experience, and identifies portals that can be considered as an example for the less successful open data portals.

  12. t

    Receipts and Outlays of the U.S. Government by Month

    • fiscaldata.treasury.gov
    Updated Jul 13, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2020). Receipts and Outlays of the U.S. Government by Month [Dataset]. https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/monthly-treasury-statement/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 13, 2020
    Description

    This table shows the receipts and outlays of the United States Government by month for the current fiscal year, up to and including the current accounting month. The table also shows the total receipts and outlays for the current fiscal year-to-date and the comparable prior fiscal year-to-date. This table includes total and subtotal rows that should be excluded when aggregating data. Some rows represent elements of the dataset's hierarchy, but are not assigned values. The classification_id for each of these elements can be used as the parent_id for underlying data elements to calculate their implied values. Subtotal rows are available to access this same information.

  13. w

    Websites using Government Site Builder

    • webtechsurvey.com
    csv
    Updated Jan 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    WebTechSurvey (2024). Websites using Government Site Builder [Dataset]. https://webtechsurvey.com/technology/government-site-builder
    Explore at:
    csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 10, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    WebTechSurvey
    License

    https://webtechsurvey.com/termshttps://webtechsurvey.com/terms

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    A complete list of live websites using the Government Site Builder technology, compiled through global website indexing conducted by WebTechSurvey.

  14. Open central government websites – April 2014

    • gov.uk
    Updated May 6, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Cabinet Office (2014). Open central government websites – April 2014 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-central-government-websites-april-2014
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 6, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
    Authors
    Cabinet Office
    Description

    There are 435 central government open websites as at 31 March 2014.

    The Cabinet Office committed to begin quarterly publication of the number of open websites starting in the financial year 2011.

    Definition of a website

    The definition used is a user-centric one. Something is counted as a separate website if it is active and either has a separate domain name or, when as a subdomain, the user cannot move freely between the subsite and parent site and there is no family likeness in the design. In other words, if the user experiences it as a separate site in their normal uses of browsing, search and interaction, it is counted as one.

    Definition of a closed website

    A website is considered closed when it ceases to be actively funded, run and managed by central government, either by packaging information and putting it in the right place for the intended audience on another website or digital channel, or by a third party taking and managing it and bearing the cost. Where appropriate, domains stay operational in order to redirect users to the http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/" class="govuk-link">UK Government Website Archive.

    Definition of the exemption process

    The GOV.UK exemption process began with a web rationalisation of the government’s internet estate to reduce the number of obsolete websites and to establish the scale of the websites that the government owns.

    Exclusions from the central government list

    Not included in the number or list are:

    • websites of public corporations as listed on the http://www.statistics.gov.uk/hub/index.html" class="govuk-link">Office for National Statistics website, partnerships more than half-funded by private sector
    • charities and national museums
    • specialist closed audience functions, such as the BIS Research Councils, BIS Sector Skills Councils and Industrial Training Boards, and the Defra Levy Boards and their websites

    Finally, those public bodies set up by Parliament and reporting directly to the Speaker’s Committee and only reporting through a ministerial government department for the purposes of enaction of legislation are also excluded (for example, the Electoral Commission and IPSA).

    As agreed in the quarterly report of February 2013, the following sites have been included in the list:

    • ‘.independent’ sites
    • National parks

    Inclusion under department name

    Websites are listed under the department name for which the government minister has responsibility, either directly through their departmental activities, or indirectly through being the minister reporting to Parliament for independent bodies set up by statute.

    April 2014 report

    Government website domains have been procured from as early as the 1990’s and at this time, there was no requirement upon government departments to retain a formal record of ownership. With staff changes and new departments formed, it became apparent that departments did not have a complete view of all sites in their estate.

    Government Digital Service (GDS) has worked closely with these departments to identify legacy websites which we were not originally aware of, by going through the complete list of gov.uk domains managed by Cabinet Office, under the second level domain (SLD), gov.uk. A full list of gov.uk domains can be viewed here. As well as websites on the gov.uk SLD, we had found that there are a number of legacy websites owned by departments under a .org.uk or co.uk SLD. Because we do not own these SLD’s, information on whether a department has ownership was not so easily accessible, but a strong working relationship with department leads has since helped to identify the majority of these sites.

    Previously, the Ministry of Defence conducted their own rationalisation of MOD and the armed forces sites. At the beginning of this report, we agreed to include these sites to ensure a consistent approach.

    Since the last report of January 2014, 12 websites have closed and 20 websites (including organisation pages held

  15. Z

    Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: analysis of 51 OGD portals

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    Updated Aug 4, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anastasija Nikiforova (2021). Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: analysis of 51 OGD portals [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_5142244
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Anastasija Nikiforova
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset contains data collected during a study "Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: are your open data smart enough" (Sensors. 2021; 21(15):5204) conducted by Anastasija Nikiforova (University of Latvia). It being made public both to act as supplementary data for "Smarter open government data for Society 5.0: are your open data smart enough" paper and in order for other researchers to use these data in their own work.

    The data in this dataset were collected in the result of the inspection of 60 countries and their OGD portals (total of 51 OGD portal in May 2021) to find out whether they meet the trends of Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 obtained by conducting an analysis of relevant OGD portals.

    Each portal has been studied starting with a search for a data set of interest, i.e. “real-time”, “sensor” and “covid-19”, follwing by asking a list of additional questions. These questions were formulated on the basis of combination of (1) crucial open (government) data-related aspects, including open data principles, success factors, recent studies on the topic, PSI Directive etc., (2) trends and features of Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0, (3) elements of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Model (UTAUT).

    The method used belongs to typical / daily tasks of open data portals sometimes called “usability test” – keywords related to a research question are used to filter data sets, i.e. “real-time”, “real time” and “real time”, “sensor”, covid”, “covid-19”, “corona”, “coronavirus”, “virus”. In most cases, “real-time”, “sensor” and “covid” keywords were sufficient. The examination of the respective aspects for less user-friendly portals was adapted to particular case based on the portal or data set specifics, by checking: 1. are the open data related to the topic under question ({sensor; real-time; Covid-19}) published, i.e. available? 2. are these data available in a machine-readable format? 3. are these data current, i.e. regularly updated? Where the criteria on the currency depends on the nature of data, i.e. Covid-19 data on the number of cases per day is expected to be updated daily, which won’t be sufficient for real-time data as the title supposes etc. 4. is API ensured for these data? having most importance for real-time and sensor data; 5. have they been published in a timely manner? which was verified mainly for Covid-19 related data. The timeliness is assessed by comparing the dates of the first case identified in a given country and the first release of open data on this topic. 6. what is the total number of available data sets? 7. does the open government data portal provides use-cases / showcases?
    8. does the open government portal provide an opportunity to gain insight into the popularity of the data, i.e. does the portal provide statistics of this nature, such as the number of views, downloads, reuses, rating etc.? 9. is there an opportunity to provide a feedback, comment, suggestion or complaint? 10. (9a) is the artifact, i.e. feedback, comment, suggestion or complaint, visible to other users?

    Format of the file .xls, .ods, .csv (for the first spreadsheet only)

    Licenses or restrictions CC-BY

    For more info, see README.txt

  16. d

    Updates for Data.wa.gov Publishers

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Mar 14, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.wa.gov (2025). Updates for Data.wa.gov Publishers [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/updates-for-data-wa-gov-publishers
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 14, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.wa.gov
    Description

    This page provides status reports about additions or changes to the data.wa.gov open government data portal.

  17. Annual Survey of Governments, 1990: Employment Statistics

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii
    Updated Oct 31, 1992
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States. Bureau of the Census (1992). Annual Survey of Governments, 1990: Employment Statistics [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09794.v1
    Explore at:
    asciiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Oct 31, 1992
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    United States. Bureau of the Census
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9794/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/9794/terms

    Time period covered
    Oct 1990
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Federal, state, and local government employment data are provided in this file. Full- and part-time employment, full-time equivalency, and payroll statistics are included. Data are supplied by type of government (federal, state, county, city, township, special district, and school district) and by function. Governmental functions include education (elementary, secondary, and higher education), police and fire protection, financial administration, judicial and legal functions, highways, solid waste management and sewage, libraries, air and water transportation and terminals, state liquor stores, social insurance administration, housing and community development, utilities, public welfare, parks and recreation, health care, transit, and natural resources.

  18. Open Data Portal Catalogue

    • open.canada.ca
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    csv, json, jsonl, png +2
    Updated Jun 14, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (2025). Open Data Portal Catalogue [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/c4c5c7f1-bfa6-4ff6-b4a0-c164cb2060f7
    Explore at:
    csv, sqlite, json, png, jsonl, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 14, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Treasury Board of Canada Secretariathttp://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/
    Treasury Board of Canadahttps://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/corporate/about-treasury-board.html
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The open data portal catalogue is a downloadable dataset containing some key metadata for the general datasets available on the Government of Canada's Open Data portal. Resource 1 is generated using the ckanapi tool (external link) Resources 2 - 8 are generated using the Flatterer (external link) utility. ###Description of resources: 1. Dataset is a JSON Lines (external link) file where the metadata of each Dataset/Open Information Record is one line of JSON. The file is compressed with GZip. The file is heavily nested and recommended for users familiar with working with nested JSON. 2. Catalogue is a XLSX workbook where the nested metadata of each Dataset/Open Information Record is flattened into worksheets for each type of metadata. 3. datasets metadata contains metadata at the dataset level. This is also referred to as the package in some CKAN documentation. This is the main table/worksheet in the SQLite database and XLSX output. 4. Resources Metadata contains the metadata for the resources contained within each dataset. 5. resource views metadata contains the metadata for the views applied to each resource, if a resource has a view configured. 6. datastore fields metadata contains the DataStore information for CSV datasets that have been loaded into the DataStore. This information is displayed in the Data Dictionary for DataStore enabled CSVs. 7. Data Package Fields contains a description of the fields available in each of the tables within the Catalogue, as well as the count of the number of records each table contains. 8. data package entity relation diagram Displays the title and format for column, in each table in the Data Package in the form of a ERD Diagram. The Data Package resource offers a text based version. 9. SQLite Database is a .db database, similar in structure to Catalogue. This can be queried with database or analytical software tools for doing analysis.

  19. List of government APIs

    • data.europa.eu
    excel xlsx, ods
    Updated Jan 21, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Joint Research Centre (2020). List of government APIs [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/45ca8d82-ac31-4360-b3a1-ba43b0b07377
    Explore at:
    excel xlsx, odsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 21, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Joint Research Centrehttps://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/index_en
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This list contains the government API cases collected, cleaned and analysed in the APIs4DGov study "Web API landscape: relevant general purpose ICT standards, technical specifications and terms".

    The list does not represent a complete list of all government cases in Europe, as it is built to support the goals of the study and is limited to the analysis and data gathered from the following sources:

    • The EU open data portal

    • The European data portal

    • The INSPIRE catalogue

    • JoinUp: The API cases collected from the European Commission JoinUp platform

    • Literature-document review: the API cases gathered from the research activities of the study performed till the end of 2019

    • ProgrammableWeb: the ProgrammableWeb API directory

    • Smart 2015/0041: the database of 395 cases created by the study ‘The project Towards faster implementation and uptake of open government’ (SMART 2015/0041).

    • Workshops/meetings/interviews: a list of API cases collected in the workshops, surveys and interviews organised within the APIs4DGov

    Each API case is classified accordingly to the following rationale:

    • Unique id: a unique key of each case, obtained by concatenating the following fields: (Country Code) + (Governmental level) + (Name Id) + (Type of API)

    • API Country or type of provider: the country in which the API case has been published

    • API provider: the specific provider that published and maintain the API case

    • Name Id: an acronym of the name of the API case (it can be not unique)

    • Short description

    • Type of API: (i) API registry, a set, catalogue, registry or directory of APIs; (ii) API platform: a platform that supports the use of APIs; (iii) API tool: a tool used to manage APIs; (iv) API standard: a set of standards related to government APIs; (v) Data catalogue, an API published to access metadata of datasets, normally published by a data catalogue; (vi) Specific API, a unique (can have many endpoints) API built for a specific purpose

    • Number of APIs: normally only one, in the case of API registry, the number of APIs published by the registry at the 31/12/2019

    • Theme: list of domains related to the API case (controlled vocabulary)

    • Governmental level: the geographical scope of the API (city, regional, national or international)

    • Country code: the country two letters internal code

    • Source: the source (among the ones listed in the previous) from where the API case has been gathered

  20. Leading e-government services South Korea 2024, by website

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 20, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Leading e-government services South Korea 2024, by website [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1251530/south-korea-most-used-e-government-services-by-website/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 20, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Aug 16, 2024 - Sep 30, 2024
    Area covered
    South Korea
    Description

    According to a survey conducted in South Korea in 2024, around 90 percent of respondents had visited the government website gov.kr, which offers a wide range of e-government services. Other frequently accessed sites included hometax.go.kr, which provides comprehensive tax administration services, and nhis.or.kr, the website for the National Health Insurance Service.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Cabinet Office (2013). Open central government websites - February 2012 [Dataset]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-central-government-websites-february-2012
Organization logo

Open central government websites - February 2012

Explore at:
Dataset updated
Jul 9, 2013
Dataset provided by
GOV.UKhttp://gov.uk/
Authors
Cabinet Office
Description

Background

Information was reported as correct by central government departments at 29 February 2012.

In its Structural Reform plan, the Cabinet Office committed to begin quarterly publication of the number of open websites starting in financial year 2011.

Definition of a website

The definition used of a website is a user-centric one. Something is counted as a separate website if it is active and either has a separate domain name or, when as a subdomain, the user cannot move freely between the subsite and parent site and there is no family likeness in the design. In other words, if the user experiences it as a separate site in their normal uses of browsing, search and interaction, it is counted as one.

Definition of a closed website

A website is considered closed when it ceases to be actively funded, run and managed by central government, either by packaging information and putting it in the right place for the intended audience on another website or digital channel, or by a third party taking and managing it and bearing the cost. Where appropriate, domains stay operational in order to redirect users to the http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/webarchive/" class="govuk-link">UK Government Website Archive.

Definition of the exemption process

The GOV.UK exemption process began with a web rationalisation of the government’s Internet estate to reduce the number of obsolete websites and to establish the scale of the websites that the government owns.

Exclusions from the central government list

Not included in the number or list are websites of public corporations as listed on the Office for National Statistics website, partnerships more than half-funded by private sector, charities and national museums. Specialist closed audience functions, such as the BIS Research Councils, BIS Sector Skills Councils and Industrial Training Boards, and the Defra Levy Boards and their websites, are not included in this data. The Ministry of Defence conducted their own rationalisation of MOD and the armed forces sites as an integral part of the Website Review; military sites belonging to a particular service are excluded from this dataset. Finally, those public bodies set up by Parliament and reporting directly to the Speaker’s Committee and only reporting through a ministerial government department for the purposes of enaction of legislation are also excluded (for example, the Electoral Commission and IPSA).

Inclusion under department name

Websites are listed under the department name for which the minister in HMG has responsibility, either directly through their departmental activities, or indirectly through being the minister reporting to Parliament for independent bodies set up by statute.

List of open websites

For re-usability, these are provided as Excel and CSV files.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu