Energy consumption of artificial intelligence (AI) models in training is considerable, with both GPT-3, the original release of the current iteration of OpenAI's popular ChatGPT, and Gopher consuming well over a thousand-megawatt hours of energy simply for training. As this is only for the training model it is likely that the energy consumption for the entire usage and lifetime of GPT-3 and other large language models (LLMs) is significantly higher. The largest consumer of energy, GPT-3, consumed roughly the equivalent of 200 Germans in 2022. While not a staggering amount, it is a considerable use of energy.
Energy savings through AI
While it is undoubtedly true that training LLMs takes a considerable amount of energy, the energy savings are also likely to be substantial. Any AI model that improves processes by minute numbers might save hours on shipment, liters of fuel, or dozens of computations. Each one of these uses energy as well and the sum of energy saved through a LLM might vastly outperform its energy cost. A good example is mobile phone operators, of which a third expect that AI might reduce power consumption by ten to fifteen percent. Considering that much of the world uses mobile phones this would be a considerable energy saver.
Emissions are considerable
The amount of CO2 emissions from training LLMs is also considerable, with GPT-3 producing nearly 500 tonnes of CO2. This again could be radically changed based on the types of energy production creating the emissions. Most data center operators for instance would prefer to have nuclear energy play a key role, a significantly low-emission energy producer.
GPT-3 is the most energy intensive AI program trained in 2024, with over 1200 megawatt hours consumed to train the model. Produced in 2020 the model ended up being far more energy intensive than models produced in 2023, most of which were under 400 MWh.
MATH is a new dataset of 12,500 challenging competition mathematics problems. Each problem in MATH has a full step-by-step solution which can be used to teach models to generate answer derivations and explanations.
MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
License information was derived automatically
This dataset is a combination of Stanford's Alpaca (https://github.com/tatsu-lab/stanford_alpaca) and FiQA (https://sites.google.com/view/fiqa/) with another 1.3k pairs custom generated using GPT3.5 Script for tuning through Kaggle's (https://www.kaggle.com) free resources using PEFT/LoRa: https://www.kaggle.com/code/gbhacker23/wealth-alpaca-lora GitHub repo with performance analyses, training and data generation scripts, and inference notebooks: https://github.com/gaurangbharti1/wealth-alpaca… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/gbharti/finance-alpaca.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Dataset Card for Alpaca-Cleaned
Repository: https://github.com/gururise/AlpacaDataCleaned
Dataset Description
This is a cleaned version of the original Alpaca Dataset released by Stanford. The following issues have been identified in the original release and fixed in this dataset:
Hallucinations: Many instructions in the original dataset had instructions referencing data on the internet, which just caused GPT3 to hallucinate an answer.
"instruction":"Summarize the… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/yahma/alpaca-cleaned.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
Energy consumption of artificial intelligence (AI) models in training is considerable, with both GPT-3, the original release of the current iteration of OpenAI's popular ChatGPT, and Gopher consuming well over a thousand-megawatt hours of energy simply for training. As this is only for the training model it is likely that the energy consumption for the entire usage and lifetime of GPT-3 and other large language models (LLMs) is significantly higher. The largest consumer of energy, GPT-3, consumed roughly the equivalent of 200 Germans in 2022. While not a staggering amount, it is a considerable use of energy.
Energy savings through AI
While it is undoubtedly true that training LLMs takes a considerable amount of energy, the energy savings are also likely to be substantial. Any AI model that improves processes by minute numbers might save hours on shipment, liters of fuel, or dozens of computations. Each one of these uses energy as well and the sum of energy saved through a LLM might vastly outperform its energy cost. A good example is mobile phone operators, of which a third expect that AI might reduce power consumption by ten to fifteen percent. Considering that much of the world uses mobile phones this would be a considerable energy saver.
Emissions are considerable
The amount of CO2 emissions from training LLMs is also considerable, with GPT-3 producing nearly 500 tonnes of CO2. This again could be radically changed based on the types of energy production creating the emissions. Most data center operators for instance would prefer to have nuclear energy play a key role, a significantly low-emission energy producer.