4 datasets found
  1. Participant preference and favorability rating* for self-collected saliva...

    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kevin O’Laughlin; Catherine C. Espinosa; Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat; Mitsuki Koh; George M. Khalil; Adam Hoffman; Paulina A. Rebolledo; Marcos C. Schechter; Rebekah J. Stewart; Juliana da Silva; Caitlin Biedron; Bettina Bankamp; Jennifer Folster; Amy S. Gargis; Michael D. Bowen; Ashley Paulick; Yun F. Wang; Jacqueline E. Tate; Hannah L. Kirking (2023). Participant preference and favorability rating* for self-collected saliva and anterior nasal swabs by location, reported demographics, symptoms and underlying medical history, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, August–October 2020. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264085.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Kevin O’Laughlin; Catherine C. Espinosa; Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat; Mitsuki Koh; George M. Khalil; Adam Hoffman; Paulina A. Rebolledo; Marcos C. Schechter; Rebekah J. Stewart; Juliana da Silva; Caitlin Biedron; Bettina Bankamp; Jennifer Folster; Amy S. Gargis; Michael D. Bowen; Ashley Paulick; Yun F. Wang; Jacqueline E. Tate; Hannah L. Kirking
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Description

    Participant preference and favorability rating* for self-collected saliva and anterior nasal swabs by location, reported demographics, symptoms and underlying medical history, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, August–October 2020.

  2. Comparison of wound and patient demographics by outcome (healed versus...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Jason S. Radowsky; Romon Neely; Jonathan A. Forsberg; Felipe A. Lisboa; Christopher J. Dente; Eric A. Elster; Nicole J. Crane (2023). Comparison of wound and patient demographics by outcome (healed versus dehisced) for both institutions. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204453.t002
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Jason S. Radowsky; Romon Neely; Jonathan A. Forsberg; Felipe A. Lisboa; Christopher J. Dente; Eric A. Elster; Nicole J. Crane
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Comparison of wound and patient demographics by outcome (healed versus dehisced) for both institutions.

  3. Patient demographics and summary of microbiological data of the specimens,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Miwako Kobayashi; Susan M. Ray; John Hanfelt; Yun F. Wang (2023). Patient demographics and summary of microbiological data of the specimens, per unique visit. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107552.t004
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Miwako Kobayashi; Susan M. Ray; John Hanfelt; Yun F. Wang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    • Subtotal for those with known HIV status.** p value between HIV positive and HIV negative.18 out of 412 also culture positive for MAC; 3 from HIV positive group, and 5 from HIV negative group.23 also positive for M. gordonae, 6 with M. kansasii, and 1 with Nocardia. All from HIV positive group.36 also positive for MAC. All from HIV positive group.43 also positive for MAC.51 also positive for MAC.Patient demographics and summary of microbiological data of the specimens, per unique visit.
  4. Patient demographics and summary of microbiological data of the specimens,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Miwako Kobayashi; Susan M. Ray; John Hanfelt; Yun F. Wang (2023). Patient demographics and summary of microbiological data of the specimens, per specimen. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107552.t003
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 5, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Miwako Kobayashi; Susan M. Ray; John Hanfelt; Yun F. Wang
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description
    • Subtotal for those with known HIV status.** p value between HIV positive and HIV negative.117 out of 639 specimen was also culture positive for MAC; 7 in HIV positive group and 9 in HIV negative group.24 were also culture positive for M. gordonae, 10 with M. kansasii, 2 with Nocardia. All were found among HIV positive group.310 were also culture positive for MAC. All were from HIV positive group.44 were also culture positive for MAC>All were from HIV positive group.52 were also culture positive for MAC. All were from HIV positive group.Patient demographics and summary of microbiological data of the specimens, per specimen.
  5. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Kevin O’Laughlin; Catherine C. Espinosa; Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat; Mitsuki Koh; George M. Khalil; Adam Hoffman; Paulina A. Rebolledo; Marcos C. Schechter; Rebekah J. Stewart; Juliana da Silva; Caitlin Biedron; Bettina Bankamp; Jennifer Folster; Amy S. Gargis; Michael D. Bowen; Ashley Paulick; Yun F. Wang; Jacqueline E. Tate; Hannah L. Kirking (2023). Participant preference and favorability rating* for self-collected saliva and anterior nasal swabs by location, reported demographics, symptoms and underlying medical history, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, August–October 2020. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264085.t002
Organization logo

Participant preference and favorability rating* for self-collected saliva and anterior nasal swabs by location, reported demographics, symptoms and underlying medical history, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, August–October 2020.

Related Article
Explore at:
xlsAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Jun 6, 2023
Dataset provided by
PLOShttp://plos.org/
Authors
Kevin O’Laughlin; Catherine C. Espinosa; Sarah E. Smith-Jeffcoat; Mitsuki Koh; George M. Khalil; Adam Hoffman; Paulina A. Rebolledo; Marcos C. Schechter; Rebekah J. Stewart; Juliana da Silva; Caitlin Biedron; Bettina Bankamp; Jennifer Folster; Amy S. Gargis; Michael D. Bowen; Ashley Paulick; Yun F. Wang; Jacqueline E. Tate; Hannah L. Kirking
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Atlanta, Georgia
Description

Participant preference and favorability rating* for self-collected saliva and anterior nasal swabs by location, reported demographics, symptoms and underlying medical history, Grady Memorial Hospital, Atlanta, GA, August–October 2020.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu