Title 23 of the Grant County Code is comprised of Chapters 23.04 – Zoning Districts, 23.08 – Performance and Use-specific Standards, and 23.12 – Development Standards, and official zoning maps, and shall be known as the zoning code of Grant County, Washington.The zoning code is intended to carry out the goals and policies of the Grant County Comprehensive Plan, and to benefit the public as a whole and not any specific person or class of persons. The zoning code classifies, designates, and regulates the development of land for agriculture, mineral resource extraction, residential, commercial, industrial, recreation, tourism and public land uses for the unincorporated area of Grant County.Last update1/17/2020 – Comprehensive plan amendments of 2019:Parcel 201542000 converted from Urban Commercial 2 to Urban Residential 1Parcel 201358008 converted from Rural Residential 1 to AgriculturalParcel 160788000 converted from Rural Residential 1 to Urban Residential 2Parcel 151107000 converted from Rural Residential 1 to AgriculturalParcel 170983000 converted from Rural Remote to Urban Heavy IndustrialParcel 313169000 converted from Rural Urban Reserve to Urban Commercial 2Parcel 211912000 converted from Agricultural to Rural Residential 15/17/2019 – the boundary between AG and RC was corrected to follow the north parcel line of 201370001. The parcel boundary of 201370001 had changed in 2007 but the zoning wasn’t adjusted at that time.3/25/2019 – small areas within the Desert Aire open space area were corrected because they were inadvertently missed during the 7/2/2018 update.1/17/2019 - a small portion of Desert Aire zoning was changed from RVOC to RVC.8/1/2018 – minor designation errors were corrected.7/2/2018 – a new Comprehensive Plan was adopted.

Index of the 10 km page extents of the Atlas of Grant County, WA. Click on the page of interest; in the popup, click on the more details hyperlink. The hyperlink is for the static .pdf atlas page, which shows road centerlines, address ranges, aerial photo background, points of interest, culverts, bridges, etc. The atlas is organized using the US National Grid reference system, at 10km squares.Index for Township Range Atlas of Grant County, WA. Shows road centerlines, address ranges, aerial photo background, points of interest, culverts, bridges, etc.

The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The All Roads Shapefile includes all features within the MTDB Super Class "Road/Path Features" distinguished where the MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) for the feature in MTDB tha begin with "S". This includes all primary, secondary, local neighborhood, and rural roads, city streets, vehicular trails (4wd), ramps, service drives, alleys, parking lot roads, private roads for service vehicles (logging, oil fields, ranches, etc.), bike paths or trails, bridle/horse paths, walkways/pedestrian trails, and stairways.

This map provides the location of the original land grants within present day Loudoun County from the early 1700s to early 1800s. To view a list of sortable attributes of the information, please click on the Table button in the upper right corner of the map. For additional details, please visit here.

These are the original grantings of land within the Northern Neck Proprietary by Thomas, the 6th Lord of Fairfax and/or his agents until the mid 1780s during the settlement of Virginia. The map shows the approximate location of the original land grant as well as information on the grantee, the acreage of the grant (as calculated using the GIS), the year, and additional comments. The map is intended for historical reference only, as insufficient and incomplete original boundary surveys have resulted in potential inaccurate boundaries.

The original research for all of the land grants mapped in this application was completed by historian Wynne Saffer. They were originally mapped on USGS Quadrangles at a scale of 1:24000, then scanned to a digital file and the boundaries digitized by the Loudoun County Office of Mapping and Geographic Information staff.

The orginial land grant research is located at Thomas Balch Library. The land grants can be viewed on microfilm using the Record Number as a reference. This map is also located on the Office of Mapping and Geographic Information online map gallery, which can be found here.

For more information about Loudoun County's GIS, please contact Office of Mapping and Geographic Information.

Road centerlines digitized and maintained by Grant County GIS office.ROADNAMEThe name of the road, without road type or road direction. In capital letters.ROADTYPEThe type of road. Drive, Street, Avenue, Court, Ramp, Road, Driveway, etc.ROADPOSTDIRThe direction of the road. NW, NE, SW, SE.See Grant County Code Title 10 - ROADS, HIGHWAYS AND BRIDGES >> Chapter 10.16 - DESIGNATION AND CLASSIFICATION OF COUNTY ROADS >>10.16.010, which in part states: Roads running easterly and westerly, located northerly or southerly of base line, which is the township line between Townships 18 and 19 North, to be numbered beginning with road number one being the road on Section line one mile northerly of, or southerly of, base line, as the case may be; thence one number per section line road numbered consecutively.Roads running northerly or southerly, located easterly of or westerly of meridian line, which is the range line between Ranges 26 and 27 E.W.M., to be designated by letter, the road located on section line one mile easterly of or westerly of said meridian line, as the case may be, being designated by the letter "A"; thence one letter per each section line road lettered consecutively.Intermediate roads running in a cardinal direction within sections shall be designated by the next lower number or letter, followed by the distance in tenths of a mile; for example, a road five and one-half miles north of base line in northwest quadrant would be Road 5.5 N.W.The above described plan divides the county into four quadrants; southwest, northwest, southeast, and northeast. Roads will, in addition to the above described number or letter, carry the appropriate suffix, SW, NW, SE or NE.Diagonal roads or winding roads shall be designated by name, as authorized by the board of county commissioners.ALTROADNAMEA local name or alternative name for the road.FEDROUTEThe Interstate or US Route numberSTROUTEThe State Route numberCTYROUTEA Yes entry indicates it is a County-maintained road. County maintenance responsibility changes often. The data is only as good as the last update from the Public Works Department.FULLNAMEThe full name of the road, including the Road Name, Road Type, and Post Direction. In title case capitalization.ROUTETYPEThe type of transportation route. Interstate, US, State, County, City, Rural, Access, DrivewayCityNameThe Grant County city the road is associated with.

This dataset is a compilation of county parcel data from Minnesota counties that have opted-in for their parcel data to be included in this dataset.

It includes the following 59 counties that have opted-in as of the publication date of this dataset: Aitkin County, Anoka County, Becker County, Benton County, Big Stone County, Carlton County, Carver County, Cass County, Chippewa County, Chisago County, Clay County, Clearwater County, Cook County, Crow Wing County, Dakota County, Douglas County, Fillmore County, Grant County, Hennepin County, Houston County, Isanti County, Itasca County, Jackson County, Koochiching County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake County, Lake of the Woods County, Lyon County, Marshall County, McLeod County, Mille Lacs County, Morrison County, Mower County, Murray County, Norman County, Olmsted County, Otter Tail County, Pennington County, Pipestone County, Polk County, Pope County, Ramsey County, Red Lake County, Renville County, Rice County, Scott County, Sherburne County, St. Louis County, Stearns County, Steele County, Stevens County, Traverse County, Wabasha County, Waseca County, Washington County, Wilkin County, Winona County, Wright County, and Yellow Medicine County.

If you represent a county not included in this dataset and would like to opt-in, please contact Heather Albrecht (Heather.Albrecht@hennepin.us), co-chair of the Minnesota Geospatial Advisory Council (GAC)’s Parcels and Land Records Committee's Open Data Subcommittee. County parcel data does not need to be in the GAC parcel data standard to be included. MnGeo will map the county fields to the GAC standard.

County parcel data records have been assembled into a single dataset with a common coordinate system (UTM Zone 15) and common attribute schema. The county parcel data attributes have been mapped to the GAC parcel data standard for Minnesota: https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/committee/standards/parcel_attrib/parcel_attrib.html

This compiled parcel dataset was created using Python code developed by Minnesota state agency GIS professionals, and represents a best effort to map individual county source file attributes into the common attribute schema of the GAC parcel data standard. The attributes from counties are mapped to the most appropriate destination column. In some cases, the county source files included attributes that were not mapped to the GAC standard. Additionally, some county attribute fields were parsed and mapped to multiple GAC standard fields, such as a single line address. Each quarter, MnGeo provides a text file to counties that shows how county fields are mapped to the GAC standard. Additionally, this text file shows the fields that are not mapped to the standard and those that are parsed. If a county shares changes to how their data should be mapped, MnGeo updates the compilation. If you represent a county and would like to update how MnGeo is mapping your county attribute fields to this compiled dataset, please contact us.

This dataset is a snapshot of parcel data, and the source date of the county data may vary. Users should consult County websites to see the most up-to-date and complete parcel data.

There have been recent changes in date/time fields, and their processing, introduced by our software vendor. In some cases, this has resulted in date fields being empty. We are aware of the issue and are working to correct it for future parcel data releases.

The State of Minnesota makes no representation or warranties, express or implied, with respect to the use or reuse of data provided herewith, regardless of its format or the means of its transmission. THE DATA IS PROVIDED “AS IS” WITH NO GUARANTEE OR REPRESENTATION ABOUT THE ACCURACY, CURRENCY, SUITABILITY, PERFORMANCE, MECHANTABILITY, RELIABILITY OR FITINESS OF THIS DATA FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. This dataset is NOT suitable for accurate boundary determination. Contact a licensed land surveyor if you have questions about boundary determinations.

DOWNLOAD NOTES: This dataset is only provided in Esri File Geodatabase and OGC GeoPackage formats. A shapefile is not available because the size of the dataset exceeds the limit for that format. The distribution version of the fgdb is compressed to help reduce the data footprint. QGIS users should consider using the Geopackage format for better results.

Data from Washington State Department of Ecology. Downloaded from web page http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/data/data.htm on 3/28/2016.This GIS layer contains bathymetric contours of selected freshwater lakes in Grant County, Washington during the mid-seventies. The bathymetric contours were digitized from maps contained in a series of seven documents: Reconnaissance Data on Lakes in Washington, Water-Supply Bulletin 43, Volume 1 through 7 by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology.

The TIGER/Line Files are shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) that are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line File is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Linear Water Features includes single-line drainage water features and artificial path features that run through double-line drainage features such as rivers and streams, and serve as a linear representation of these features. The artificial path features may correspond to those in the USGS National Hydrographic Dataset (NHD). However, in many cases the features do not match NHD equivalent feature and will not carry the NHD metadata codes. These features have a MAF/TIGER Feature Classification Code (MTFCC) beginning with an "H" to indicate the super class of Hydrographic Features.

This layer originated from ZCTAs and has been modified in places by Grant County GIS staff based on input from local US Postal Service staff and landowners.ZIP Code Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs™) are a statistical geographic entity produced by the U.S. Census Bureau for tabulating summary statistics from the 2010 Census, first developed for Census 2000. This entity was developed to overcome the difficulties in precisely defining the land area covered by each ZIP Code™, which is necessary in order to accurately tabulate census data for that area.ZCTAs are generalized area representations of U.S. Postal Service (USPS) ZIP Code service areas. They represent the most frequently occurring five-digit ZIP Code found in a given area. Simply put, each ZCTA is built by aggregating 2010 Census blocks, whose addresses use a given ZIP Code. Each resulting ZCTA is then assigned the most frequently occurring ZIP Code as its ZCTA code. For more information, please refer to the ZCTA Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ).

This imagery service is for viewing only, no downloading of the raster images available.

sde_gis.GISUSER.CONSOLIDATED_PRECINCTS_2007_11_GRANT_sqlvw

Parcels - this layer shows the outer boundary of the land parcel. Be aware that the polygons representing land parcels are based on survey data, but do not always exactly represent the survey data. This data is only a representation of the location and size of land parcels. You are invited to submit corrections to the Data Steward. Polygons are edited continuously as land is subdivided and segregated. Updates are usually posted bi-monthly.OwnerListing - this table lists the owner names associated with each parcel. There can be multiple owners per parcel, and ownership changes over time.

This dataset is a compilation of road centerline data from Minnesota suppliers that have opted-in for their road centerline data to be included in this dataset.

It includes the following 45 suppliers that have opted-in to share their data openly as of the publication date of this dataset: Metropolitan Emergency Services Board (10 counties), Aitkin County, Becker County, Benton County, Cass County, Chippewa County, Clay County, Cook County, Crow Wing County, Douglas County, Fillmore County, Grant County, Houston County, Itasca County, Koochiching County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake County, Le Sueur County, Lyon County, Marshall County, McLeod County, Morrison County, Mower County, Murray County, Otter Tail County, Pipestone County, Polk County, Pope County, Renville County, Rock County, Saint Louis County, Stearns County, Stevens County, Waseca County, Winona County, Wright County, and Yellow Medicine County.

The two sources of road centerline data are the Minnesota Next Generation 9-1-1 (NG9-1-1) Program, in collaboration with local data suppliers, and the MetroGIS Road Centerlines (Geospatial Advisory Council Schema) which is on the Minnesota Geospatial Commons:

The Minnesota NG9-1-1 Program enterprise database provides the data outside of the Metro Region which is provide by the suppliers. The data have been aggregated into a single dataset which implements the MN NG9-1-1 GIS Data Model (https://ng911gis-minnesota.hub.arcgis.com/documents/79beb1f9bde84e84a0fa9b74950f7589/about ).

Only data which have meet the requirements for supporting NG9-1-1 are in the statewide aggregate GIS data. MnGeo extracts the available data, applies domain translations, and transforms it to UTM Zone 15 to comply with the GAC road centerline attribute schema: https://www.mngeo.state.mn.us/committee/standards/roadcenterline/index.html.

The MetroGIS Road Centerlines data was created by a joint collaborative project involving the technical and managerial GIS staff from the the Metropolitan Counties (Anoka, Carver, Chisago, Dakota, Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott, Sherburne, and Washington), the Metropolitan Emergency Services Board, MetroGIS and the Metropolitan Council. The data are pulled from the Minnesota Geospatial Commons: https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metrogis-trans-road-centerlines-gac

‘Supplier’ is a term used throughout this document. A supplier will typically be a county, but it could also be a public safety answering point (PSAP), region, or tribal nation. The supplier is the agency which provides the individual datasets for the aggregated dataset. The trans_road_centerlines_open_metadata feature layer will contain the geometry/shape of the supplier boundaries, supplier name, supplier type, and feature count.

Aggregation Process:
1. Extract NG9-1-1 data from the Department of Public Safety (DPS) Enterprise database.
2. Download the latest MetroGIS data from the Geospatial Commons.
3. Extract, Translate, and Load (ETL) the DPS data to the GAC schema.
4. Combine NG9-1-1 data with MetroGIS data.
5. Filter the data for the Opt-In Open data counties

Miscellaneous improvements by parcel number.

Cemetery districts are established to establish and operate cemeteries. Cemetery district is a variable in the computation of property tax.

This application can be used to help determine if an applicant's project meets the low/moderate income threshold for eligibility to be funded under the Lake County Illinois Community Development Block Grant program.

Data from Washington State Department of Ecology. Downloaded from web page http://www.ecy.wa.gov/services/gis/data/data.htm on 3/28/2016.This GIS layer contains bathymetric contours of selected freshwater lakes in Grant County, Washington during the mid-seventies. The bathymetric contours were digitized from maps contained in a series of seven documents: Reconnaissance Data on Lakes in Washington, Water-Supply Bulletin 43, Volume 1 through 7 by the United States Geological Survey in cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology.

This layer is filtered to show qualifying sales by the year the sale occurred. A qualifying sale is defined as original sale price greater than $0, and the state qualification code includes the values of 00-Qualifying Sale, 01-Family Sale, 02-Transfer within Corporation, 03-Administrator of Estate, 07-Tax Exempt Property, 15-Forced Sale, 21-Plottage, 24-Current Use (84.34), 25-Change of Use, 26-Current Year Segregation.

A Shoreline Master Program is a combination of planning and regulatory documents. SMP documents carry out the policies of the Shoreline Management Act (RCW 90.58) on local shorelines. Local governments are required to prepare SMPs based on the state laws and rules. It is prepared to implement the SMA to prevent "harm caused by uncoordinated and piecemeal development of the State's shoreline." Local SMPs are tailored to local geographic and environmental conditions, and existing and future planned development patterns within the shoreline. The SMP update process balances and integrates objectives and interests of local citizens. Key principles of the SMP include striking a balance among environmental protection, public access and water-oriented uses, and achieving "No Net Loss" of ecological functions. The SMP was approved by Washington State Department of Ecology on 9/8/2014. The SMP became effective in Grant County on 9/22/2014. The Grant County Final Shoreline Master Program is available at the Planning Department's web site

This is not a complete representation of the road system of Grant County. It is an export from a linear reference system feature class used for the business needs of the Public Works Department. The feature class named Road Centerlines contains the same geometry and some of the same attributes. The value of this feature class is that it provides more detailed tabular information for County-Maintained roads.ROADNAMEName of the roadROADLOGidentifier for the Public Works Road LogBMPBeginning MilepostEMPEnding MilepostLENGTHThe segment length between the BMP and EMPFROM_Text description of the origin point of the road segmentTOText description of the terminal point of the road segmentLANESNumber of lanes to the roadWIDTHRoad lane width in feetSURFACESurface type of the roadACP = Hot Mixed AsphaltBST = Bituminous Surface TreatmentGRD = GravelGRV = GradedHMA = Hot Mixed AsphaltPCC = Portland Concrete CementUNI = UnimprovedSTRUCTURESubsurface composition of the roadACP = Hot Mixed AsphaltBST = Bituminous Surface TreatmentGRD = GravelGRV = GradedHMA = Hot Mixed AsphaltPCC = Portland Concrete CementUNI = UnimprovedMAINTThe code value for the Public Works Maintenance District1; 11; 12; 13; 14; 15; 16 = District 121; 22; 23 = District 231; 32; 33; 34; 35= District 3SPEEDThe speed limit of the roadUIDA unique identifier for each road segment. It is a combination of ROADLOG, BMP, and EMP