This report was released in September 2010. However, recent demographic data is available on the datastore - you may find other datasets on the Datastore useful such as: GLA Population Projections, National Insurance Number Registrations of Overseas Nationals, Births by Birthplace of Mother, Births and Fertility Rates, Office for National Statistics (ONS) Population Estimates

FOCUSONLONDON2010:POPULATIONANDMIGRATION

London is the United Kingdom’s only city region. Its population of 7.75 million is 12.5 per cent of the UK population living on just 0.6 per cent of the land area. London’s average population density is over 4,900 persons per square kilometre, this is ten times that of the second most densely populated region.

Between 2001 and 2009 London’s population grew by over 430 thousand, more than any other region, accounting for over 16 per cent of the UK increase.

This report discusses in detail the population of London including Population Age Structure, Fertility and Mortality, Internal Migration, International Migration, Population Turnover and Churn, and Demographic Projections.

Population and Migration report is the first release of the Focus on London 2010-12 series. Reports on themes such as Income, Poverty, Labour Market, Skills, Health, and Housing are also available.

PRESENTATION:

To access an interactive presentation about population changes in London click the link to see it on Prezi.com

FACTS:

• Top five boroughs for babies born per 10,000 population in 2008-09:
• 1. Newham – 244.4
• 2. Barking and Dagenham – 209.3
• 3. Hackney – 205.7
• 4. Waltham Forest – 202.7
• 5. Greenwich – 196.2
• ...
• 32. Havering – 116.8
• 33. City of London – 47.0
• In 2009, Barnet overtook Croydon as the most populous London borough. Prior to this Croydon had been the largest since 1966
• Population per hectare of land used for Domestic building and gardens is highest in Tower Hamlets
• In 2008-09, natural change (births minus deaths) led to 78,000 more Londoners compared with only 8,000 due to migration. read more about this or click play on the chart below to reveal how regional components of populations change have altered over time.

Historical Dataset of Hackney Pri is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2003-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (1999-2023),Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2020),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2014-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2003-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2003-2023)

In 2023, Croydon had the largest population among London's 32 boroughs at 397,741, while Kensington and Chelsea had the smallest population, at 147,460.

The London Borough Profiles help paint a general picture of an area by presenting a range of headline indicator data in both spreadsheet and map form to help show statistics covering demographic, economic, social and environmental datasets for each borough, alongside relevant comparator areas. The London Borough Atlas does the same but provides further detailed breakdowns and time-series data for each borough. The full datasets and more information for each of the indicators are usually available on the London Datastore. A link to each of the datasets is contained in the spreadsheet and map. London Borough Profiles On opening the Microsoft Excel version, a simple drop down box allows you to choose which borough profile you are interested in. Selecting this will display data for that borough, plus either Inner or Outer London, London and a national comparator (usually England where data is available). To see the full set of data for all 33 local authorities in London plus the comparator areas in Excel, click the 'Data' worksheet. A chart and a map are also available to help visualise the data for all boroughs (macros must be enabled for the Excel map to function). The data is set out across 11 themes covering most of the key indicators relating to demographic, economic, social and environmental data. Sources are provided in the spreadsheet. Notes about the indicator are provided in comment boxes attached to the indicator names. For a geographical and bar chart representation of the profile data, choose the InstantAtlas version. Choose indicators from the left hand side. Click on the comparators to make them appear on the chart and map. Sources, links to data, and notes are all contained in the box in the bottom right hand corner. These profiles include data relating to: Population, Households (census), Demographics, Migrant population, Ethnicity, Language, Employment, NEET, DWP Benefits (client group), Housing Benefit, Qualifications, Earnings, Volunteering, Jobs density, Business Survival, Crime, Fires, House prices, New homes, Tenure, Greenspace, Recycling, Carbon Emissions, Cars, Public Transport Accessibility (PTAL), Indices of Multiple Deprivation, GCSE results, Children looked after, Children in out-of-work families, Life Expectancy, Teenage conceptions, Happiness levels, Political control, and Election turnout. London Borough Atlas To access even more data at local authority level, use the London Borough Atlas. It contains data about the same topics as the profiles but provides further detailed breakdowns and time-series data for each borough. There is also an InstantAtlas version available. The London boroughs are: City of London, Barking and Dagenham, Barnet, Bexley, Brent, Bromley, Camden, Croydon, Ealing, Enfield, Greenwich, Hackney, Hammersmith and Fulham, Haringey, Harrow, Havering, Hillingdon, Hounslow, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Kingston upon Thames, Lambeth, Lewisham, Merton, Newham, Redbridge, Richmond upon Thames, Southwark, Sutton, Tower Hamlets, Waltham Forest, Wandsworth, Westminster. You may also find our small area profiles useful - Ward, LSOA, and MSOA.

The spreadsheet shows numbers and percentages of people in work aged 16-74 who travel to work by bicycle for all wards in London, from 2001 and 2011 Census. Included percentage point change, and rankings.

https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/londondatastore-upload/cycling-map-wards-2011.png" alt=""/>

Top 10 Wards in 2011:

Rank, Ward name, Borough name, % travel by bicycle, 2011

1 Queensbridge, Hackney, 19.1

2 Clissold, Hackney, 18.9

3, Stoke Newington Central, Hackney, 18.8

4 Dalston, Hackney, 18.3,

5, Hackney Downs, Hackney, 17.7

6, Hackney Central, Hackney, 16.9

7, Leabridge, Hackney, 15.9

8, Victoria, Hackney, 15.8

9, Chatham, Hackney, 14.8

10, Wick, Hackney, 14.6

TFL have produced a report titled 'How has cycling grown in London and how will it grow in future?'

Live births by local authority of usual residence of mother, General Fertility Rates and Total Fertility Rates. The general fertility rate (GFR) is the number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15-44. Rates are based on the most up-to-date population estimates. The General Fertility Rate (GFR) is the number of live births per 1,000 women aged 15-44. The Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is the average number of live children that a group of women would bear if they experienced the age-specific fertility rates of the calendar year in question throughout their childbearing lifespan. The TFR has been calculated using the number of live births and the mid-year population estimates (sub-nationally) and the projections (nationally) for women by single year of age. This generally produces a better match of births to those at risk of having births. However, local authority level population estimates are only considered reliable in five-year age bands. Thus, especially in small local authorities, it should be noted that rates computed using single year of age data may produce spurious results. City of London has been grouped with Hackney after 2004. Read more on the ONS website ONS have also produces birth statistics for mid-year for small areas.

The ward profiles and ward atlas provide a range of demographic and related data for each ward in Greater London. They are designed to provide an overview of the population in these small areas by presenting a range of data on the population, diversity, households, life expectancy, housing, crime, benefits, land use, deprivation, and employment. Indicators included here are population by age and sex, land area, projections, population density, household composition, religion, ethnicity, birth rates (general fertility rate), death rates (standardised mortality ratio), life expectancy, average house prices, properties sold, housing by council tax band, tenure, property size (bedrooms), dwelling build period and type, mortgage and landlord home repossession, employment and economic activity, Incapacity Benefit, Housing Benefit, Household income, Income Support and JobSeekers Allowance claimant rates, dependent children receiving child-tax credits by lone parents and out-of-work families, child poverty, National Insurance Number registration rates for overseas nationals (NINo), GCSE results, A-level / Level 3 results (average point scores), pupil absence, child obesity, crime rates (by type of crime), fires, ambulance call outs, road casualties, happiness and well-being, land use, public transport accessibility (PTALs), access to public greenspace, access to nature, air emissions / quality, car use, bicycle travel, Indices of Deprivation, and election turnout. The Ward Profiles present key summary measures for the most recent year, using both Excel and InstantAtlas mapping software. This is a useful tool for displaying a large amount of data for numerous geographies, in one place. The Ward Atlas presents a more detailed version of the data including trend data and generally includes the raw numbers as opposed to percentages or rates. The Instant Atlas reports use HTML5 technology, which can be used in modern browsers, including on Apple machines, but will not function on older browsers. WARD PROFILES Compare the ward measure against the Borough, London and National average. WARD ATLAS Access the raw data for all London wards. WARD ATLAS FOR 2014 BOUNDARIES In May 2014, ward boundaries changed in Hackney, Kensington and Chelsea, and Tower Hamlets. This version of the ward atlas gives data for these new wards, as well as retaining data on the unchanged wards in the rest of London for comparison purposes. Data for boroughs has also been included. Very few datasets have been published for the new ward boundaries, so the majority of data contained in this atlas have been modelled using a method of proportion of households from the old boundaries that are located in the new boundaries. Therefore, the data contained in this atlas are indicative only. Instant Atlas for 2014 Ward Atlas Tips: - Select a new indicator from the Data box on the left. Select the theme, then indicator and then year to show the data. - To view data just for one borough*, use the filter tool. - Some legend settings can be altered by clicking on the cog icon next to the Wards tick box within the map legend. - The wards can be ranked in order by clicking at the top of the indicator column of the data table. Note: Additional indicator information and sources are included within the spreadsheet and Instant Atlas report. OTHER SMALL AREA PROFILES Other profiles available include Borough, LSOA and MSOA atlases. Data from these profiles were used to create the Well-being scores tool. *The London boroughs are: City of London, Barking and Dagenham, Barnet, Bexley, Brent, Bromley, Camden, Croydon, Ealing, Enfield, Greenwich, Hackney, Hammersmith and Fulham, Haringey, Harrow, Havering, Hillingdon, Hounslow, Islington, Kensington and Chelsea, Kingston upon Thames, Lambeth, Lewisham, Merton, Newham, Redbridge, Richmond upon Thames, Southwark, Sutton, Tower Hamlets, Waltham Forest, Wandsworth, Westminster. These profiles were created using the most up to date information available at the time of collection (September 2015).

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner. The purpose of this study was to investigate the degree of support and potential support for the National Front among 16-20 year olds living in the Westminster politiical constituencies of Hackney South and Shoreditch in 1978. Main Topics: Attitudinal/behavioural questions: length of residence in area, perceived advantages/disadvantages, whether respondent feels area has improved or worsened over past five years or will improve or worsen in future years, reasons for feeling this way, attitude to people living in the area in general and towards specific groups (e.g. police officers, immigrants, people of other ethnic groups, social workers, teachers, etc.), degree of political interest and activity, knowledge of local/national politics, party affiliation, parents' party affiliation, turnout intention for local election, past and future protest participation, attitude to use of violence to support a cause; attitude to government's use of force in particular circumstances (e.g. using troops to break strikes, banning all public protest demonstrations), attitude to law and order, racial discrimination and prejudice, political efficacy, government and politicians, personal efficacy.Demographic variables: employment status, occupation, school leaving age, qualifications, father's occupation, sex, marital status.Users should be aware that the questionnaire and data labels may contain terms that were in use in 1978, but may now be considered offensive to certain groups of people. Simple random sample Face-to-face interview

National Statistics release of the main DWP-administered benefits via Stat-Xplore or supplementary tables where appropriate.

Housing Benefit

An interruption in the supply of data from Hackney Borough Council has affected Housing Benefit (HB) statistics from December 2020. Data problems are unlikely to be fixed until late into 2021 and until then HB statistics that cover Hackney will be derived from earlier data. This means estimates for London and Hackney on Stat-Xplore will deteriorate in their quality and accuracy. To find out what we are doing to maintain our HB statistics, please refer to our background information note for the DWP benefits statistics. Please also note caveats and warnings on Stat-Xplore where they appear.

State Pension

During 2019, a new DWP computer system called “Get Your State Pension” (GYSP) came online to handle new State Pension claims. Initially, the GYSP system handled claims received online through the GOV.UK site, where people have been sent invitations to claim in this new way.

The number of State Pension recipients being handled by the new system has been gradually building up, and at November 2020 there were approximately 47,100 cases in payment on the new system. This represents 0.4% of the total number of State Pension recipients.

We are not yet able to include GYSP data in our published statistics for State Pension. Figures will therefore carry an undercount. We are developing new statistical datasets that will enable us include them in the near future. Once we have quality assured the new data we will announce further plans for their inclusion.

Further information about this release can be found on the DWP benefits statistics collection page and in the “Welfare and Benefits” community on StatsUserNet.

We now have a dedicated email address for these statistics. If you have any comments or questions, get in touch at: benefits.statistics@dwp.gov.uk.

Also published

Also published as part of this release as data tables are statistics on:

• Maternity Allowance
• Industrial Injuries Disablement Benefit

More information

A statistical summary document is published every 6 months in February and August each year. It contains a high level summary of the latest National Statistics on DWP benefits.

Find further information about the statistics, including details on changes and revisions, in the background and methodology documents.

The percentage of respondents to the Adult Social Care Survey (service users) who responded to the question "Thinking about how much contact you've had with people you like, which of the following statements best describes your social situation?" with the answer "I have as much social contact as I want with people I like".

This measure applies to those people in receipt, at the point that data are extracted, of long-term support services funded or managed by social services following a full assessment of need.

Rationale There is clear link between loneliness and poor mental and physical health. A key element of the Government's vision for social care is to tackle loneliness and social isolation, supporting people to remain connected to their communities and to develop and maintain connections to their friends and family. This measure will draw on self-reported levels of social contact as an indicator of social isolation for both users of social care and carers.

Definition of numerator The number of respondents to the Adult Social Care Survey (service users) who responded to the question "Thinking about how much contact you've had with people you like, which of the following statements best describes your social situation?" with the answer "I have as much social contact as I want with people I like".

Definition of denominator The number of people responding to the question "Thinking about how much contact you've had with people that you like" in the Adult Social Care Survey (service users).

Caveats

Note: Isles of Scilly and City of London are exempt from the survey as the number of service users within their area who met the survey eligibility criteria are generally too small to guarantee statistically robust results. However, City of London has submitted data in some years, including in the 2021 to 2022 dataset, when it had sufficient numbers for statistically robust reporting.

Lewisham Council did not submit data for 2021 to 2022 due to a change in staffing and lack of awareness of the ASCS. Hackney Council was unable to submit ASCS data for 2021 to 2022 due to a serious cyber attack. No data was available for Hackney for 2022 to 2023. To maintain comparability with previous years, NHS Digital used 2019 to 2020 data from Hackney in the England and regional aggregated totals. Further details are available in the Adult Social Care Activity and Finance data quality report.

Covid-19 has impacted adult social care data collections, processing, and quality assurance since March 2020. The 2020 to 2021 Adult Social Care survey was voluntary, and only 18 councils participated. Therefore, this indicator was not updated for that year in the Profile.

Kent and Wokingham councils did not conduct a survey in 2019 to 2020. Trafford Council's 2019 to 2020 data was incomplete and only reflects service users with learning disabilities. As the responses are not from a fully representative subset, caution is advised when reviewing this data. Several other councils also had sample sizes under 100 for this question in 2019 to 2020, and these are flagged with a 'value note' in the tool.

Further data quality details are provided in the annual survey reports: Personal Social Services Adult Social Care Survey.

Data are unavailable for the Isles of Scilly for all years and for the City of London in 2019 to 2020, 2017 to 2018, 2015 to 2016, 2013 to 2014, 2012 to 2013, and 2010 to 2011. Slough Council did not conduct the survey in 2012 to 2013, and Richmond Council did not conduct it in 2010 to 2011. The age 65+ version of this indicator is only displayed from 2014 to 2015 onwards.

Percentages are rounded to one decimal place and numbers to the nearest five. Different base values (sample sizes) for each group mean some figures may be more uncertain than others. Group characteristics, such as age, may also affect figures. For example, the age profile of the White ethnic group may differ from others, impacting outcome values in ethnicity breakdowns.

There were several changes to national adult social care data collections in the 2014 to 2015 reporting year. The main change was replacing the Referrals, Assessments and Packages of Care (RAP) return with the Short and Long Term services (SALT) collection, altering the survey's target population. Key changes include:

Exclusion of users whose only services are equipment, professional support, or short-term residential care.
Inclusion of ‘Full cost clients’ who pay fully for services but are assessed and supported by the local authority.

These changes may affect comparability with data from previous years and between local authorities, though they may also improve consistency across councils.

Participants’ demographics and clinical characteristics.

This collection consists of transcripts of paired interviews of 127 speakers aged 4–40, 5 age groups; working-class Londoners from Hackney, Haringey and Islington of different ethnicities, c. 1.6 million words. Multi-ethnic and multilingual cities throughout northern Europe are spawning new varieties of their national languages. ‘Multicultural London English’ (MLE) is a case in point. Baptised ‘Jafaican’ by the media, this new variety of English combines pronunciations from the immigrants’ languages with features we can trace to Cockney, as well as to general developments in the South of England. Young people of all ethnicities tend to say ‘fehs’ and ‘coht’ for face and coat, instead of the traditional ‘fice’ and ‘cowt’. Like young speakers everywhere, Londoners say ‘I WAS LIKE “that’s stupid”. But they also use ‘THIS IS ME: “let’s go home”’, rarely found elsewhere. We wanted to establish how MLE arose. We recorded not only teenagers but also children as young as 4 and adults. Unexpectedly, MLE was quite well established among the youngest children, suggesting they acquired it from peers and older children, not their parents, who were mostly not first-language English speakers. Young adults used it, but less consistently than teenagers. Older adults did not, probably because they grew up before it had become established. We investigated whether MLE was similar across ethnicities and districts: perceptually, listeners could not distinguish ethnicity with any certainty, while more MLE-sounding voices were likely to be thought to be from London. We conclude that this multi-ethnic variety emerges because children select from a ‘pool’ of linguistic features they hear around them, giving rise to a new, possibly permanent, way of speaking. We argue this is a distinct form of language change. London has long been considered by linguists as a motor of change in the English language in Britain. The investigators’ ESRC-funded studies from the early 90s to 2007 show that, while there is widespread ‘levelling’ in the south-east, leading to greater uniformity in accent and grammar, there are new, largely minority ethnic-based changes emerging in inner-city London. The present project investigates whether and how young children acquire these new features, how they are maintained or accentuated in adolescence, and whether they are maintained in adulthood. If they are, this will have consequences for the development of spoken English in Britain. The research asks: Are there different ‘ethnic’ Englishes in London, or is the new variety, dubbed ‘Multicultural London English’ (MLE), relatively uniform across ethnicities, including ‘Anglos’? Do Londoners change their speech across the lifespan? What features enter into MLE, and which don’t? Do Londoners detect any ethnic affiliation for the features? Are there rhythmic differences in the speech of Londoners? The project will record, mainly in pairs, at least 112 people from the northern inner city, ages ranging from 4 to 40 and the ethnic balance reflecting the local population. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses will be performed. Face-to-face interviews with young people resident in Hackney, Islington and Haringey, London, ages 4 to 45, quota sample. Most interviews were done in pairs. Two interviewers were involved:one (female, white British Londoner, 40s) did the vast majority. The other (male, Asian British Birmingham, 30) did the rest (mostly the young children). The files are in folders arranged by age group.

Crime Rates of offences per thousand population, by broad crime grouping, by financial year for wards. Offences: These are confirmed reports of crimes being committed. All data relates to "notifiable offences" - which are designated categories of crimes that all police forces in England and Wales are required to report to the Home Office. Ward data should not be aggregated to give a borough or London total. This is because a small percentage (less than 5%) of crimes in this dataset have not been geocoded to a ward. Therefore total numbers and rates are indicative only, and are not an exact measure at ward level. The rate is calculated using ward GLA 2012-based (SHLAA) population projections, and population data calculated and constrained to 2012 Borough (SHLAA) projections. The London figure only includes the Met Police area, not the City of London. The London total includes all offences in the Met Police Area including those that could not be geocoded. Therefore the London total will not equal the sum of the wards. Some ward boundaries changed in 2014. From 2013/14 the data shown is for the new boundaries. This only affects Hackney, Kensington and Chelsea, and Tower Hamlets. From 2013/14, the numbers and rates for 2013 ward boundaries in Hackney, K&C and Tower Hamlets, have all been modelled based on the proportion of population living in each area at the 2011 Census. Action Fraud have taken over the recording of fraud offences on behalf of individual police forces. This process began in April 2011 and was rolled out to all police forces by March 2013. Due to this change caution should be applied when comparing data over this transitional period and with earlier years. Data by detailed crime group and month are available from the MPS website .

Demographic and clinical characteristics of PD and age-matched Non-PD participants.

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of subjects.

L-ispreadsheet turi n-numri u l-perċentwali ta’ persuni li jaħdmu fl-età ta’ 16–74 sena li jivvjaġġaw lejn ix-xogħol bir-roti għas-swali kollha f’Londra, mill-2001 u l-2011. Inklużi l-bidla punt perċentwali, u l-klassifikazzjonijiet.

Top 10 Wards fl-2011:

Rank, Isem Ward, isem Borough, % vjaġġ bir-rota, 2011

1 Queensbridge, Hackney, 19.1

2 Clissold, Hackney, 18.9

3, Stoke Newington Ċentrali, Hackney, 18.8

4 Dalston, Hackney, 18.3,

5, Hackney Downs, Hackney, 17.7

6, Hackney Ċentrali, Hackney, 16.9

7, Leabridge, Hackney, 15.9

8, Victoria, Hackney, 15.8

9, Chatham, Hackney, 14.8

10, Wick, Hackney, 14.6

TfL ipproduċew rapport intitolat “Kif kiber iċ-ċikliżmu f’Londra u kif se jikber fil-futur?”

Arvutustabelis on näidatud nende 16–74-aastaste töötavate inimeste arv ja protsent, kes reisivad jalgrattaga tööle kõikidesse palatitesse Londonis, alates 2001. ja 2011. aasta rahvaloendusest. Sisaldab protsentuaalset muutust ja pingeridasid.

Top 10 Wards aastal 2011:

Auaste, Ward nimi, Borough nimi, % jalgrattaga reisimine, 2011

1 Queensbridge, Hackney, 19.1

2 Clissold, Hackney, 18.9

3, Stoke Newington Central, Hackney, 18.8

4 Dalston, Hackney, 18.3,

5, Hackney Downs, Hackney, 17.7

6, Hackney Central, Hackney, 16.9

7, Leabridge, Hackney, 15.9

8, Victoria, Hackney, 15.8

9, Chatham, Hackney, 14.8

10, Wick, Hackney, 14.6

TfL on koostanud aruande pealkirjaga „Kuidas on jalgrattasõit Londonis kasvanud ja kuidas see tulevikus kasvab?“