This chart looks at the U.S. states with the largest number of workers per 100k immigrants, specifically looking at the 10 states with the highest percentage of workers per 100k immigrants.

United States CCI: Present Situation: sa: Employment: Jobs Hard to Get data was reported at 16.600 % in Apr 2025. This records an increase from the previous number of 16.100 % for Mar 2025. United States CCI: Present Situation: sa: Employment: Jobs Hard to Get data is updated monthly, averaging 25.400 % from Feb 1967 (Median) to Apr 2025, with 637 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 61.600 % in Dec 1982 and a record low of 9.600 % in Mar 2022. United States CCI: Present Situation: sa: Employment: Jobs Hard to Get data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by The Conference Board. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.H049: Consumer Confidence Index. [COVID-19-IMPACT]

In 2024, about 62.7 percent of the Asian community was employed. The highest employment rate was found among Mexican-Americans, at 64.1 percent, and the lowest employment rate was found among Puerto Ricans, at 55.2 percent. In total, around 60 percent of all working-age Americans were employed at this time.

United States Exports: Machining Centers for Machine Working Hard Materials data was reported at 0.958 USD mn in Jan 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 1.324 USD mn for Dec 2024. United States Exports: Machining Centers for Machine Working Hard Materials data is updated monthly, averaging 0.528 USD mn from Jan 2017 (Median) to Jan 2025, with 97 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 3.461 USD mn in Dec 2019 and a record low of 0.059 USD mn in Feb 2017. United States Exports: Machining Centers for Machine Working Hard Materials data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.JA026: Exports: by Commodity: 6 Digit HS Code: HS 72 to 84.

In the first quarter of 2024, almost two-thirds percent of the total wealth in the United States was owned by the top 10 percent of earners. In comparison, the lowest 50 percent of earners only owned 2.5 percent of the total wealth. Income inequality in the U.S. Despite the idea that the United States is a country where hard work and pulling yourself up by your bootstraps will inevitably lead to success, this is often not the case. In 2023, 7.4 percent of U.S. households had an annual income under 15,000 U.S. dollars. With such a small percentage of people in the United States owning such a vast majority of the country’s wealth, the gap between the rich and poor in America remains stark. The top one percent The United States follows closely behind China as the country with the most billionaires in the world. Elon Musk alone held around 219 billion U.S. dollars in 2022. Over the past 50 years, the CEO-to-worker compensation ratio has exploded, causing the gap between rich and poor to grow, with some economists theorizing that this gap is the largest it has been since right before the Great Depression.

The Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) project was designed to fill the gap in knowledge about employment retention and advancement strategies that might be effective. The goal of ERA was to identify and rigorously test a diverse set of innovative models designed to promote employment stability and wage or earnings progression among current or former welfare recipients or other low-income groups. As part of ERA, over a dozen different program models have been evaluated over the past 10 years using random assignment research designs. These models embodied states' and localities' choices of program goals, target populations, and program features, and the programs were largely paid for through existing funding streams. The programs were thus "real-world" interventions initiated by practitioners and not programs set up and funded solely for research purposes. The diversity of the models presents an opportunity to explore the effectiveness of a variety of strategies implemented for different populations in order to identify what might work. This collection includes seven datasets, four classified as Core/Final Report Sites and three from Harder to Employ Sites. Almost all of the ERA programs targeted current or former recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), the cash welfare program that mainly serves single mothers and their children. The programs differed, however, in terms of when services were first provided and to whom. The Harder to Employ Sites files focus on the three ERA models that served harder to employ populations; (1) Tier 2 program in Minnesota: unemployed welfare-to-work participants who were in welfare-to-work services for a year or longer and hadn't been employed in the previous three months were given welfare-to-work services aimed at addressing barriers to employment which took into account their employment limitations. The Tier 2 program focused on assessing barriers to employment and addressing those barriers through referrals to appropriate services and close monitoring and follow-up. (2) New York City PRIDE: welfare recipients who were deemed "employable with limitations" were required to take part in welfare-to-work activities -- which emphasized unpaid work experience, education, and job placement assistance -- however, the program took into account their employment limitations when placing them in activities. The PRIDE program began with an in-depth assessment of participants' work and education history and their medical conditions. (3) New York City Substance Abuse Case Management (SACM): public assistance applicants and recipients who screened positive for signs of substance abuse were given a mandatory appointment to assess the level of substance abuse treatment needed. Depending on the outcome of the assessment, clients were referred to treatment, employment services, or a combination of both. Noncompliance at any stage resulted in sanctions and loss of public assistance benefits. Information was collected on respondents' employment status, job training, pay rate and benefits, occupation sector, health care, childcare, transportation, and a variety of job related topics. Demographic variables included household income, housing arrangements, number of people living in household, and respondent health status.

This survey gauged public opinion regarding Japan. Respondents were asked to identify the strongest economic power in the world from a list that included both Japan and the United States and to indicate their approval or disapproval of the way George Bush handled relations with Japan. They were also asked whether their impressions of Japan were favorable, how they would describe relations between the United States and Japan, and whether relations were getting better. The survey also solicited opinions on whether Japan was a reliable ally of the United States, whether Japan had gained respect as a result of the war in the Persian Gulf, and whether Japan had provided enough financial assistance for the Persian Gulf War. Concerning trade, respondents were asked whether Japan practiced fair trade with the United States and vice versa, how important rice as a trade issue was between Japan and the United States, and whether United States farmers should be able to export as much rice to Japan as they could sell there. Respondents were also asked if Japanese investment in the United States was a good thing for the United States, whether restrictions should be placed on Japanese investments in the United States, and whether Japan's current economic strength posed a threat to the United States. In addition, the survey posed questions pertaining to whether life was better in Japan or in the United States, whether Japanese or American workers worked harder, whether Japan or the United States was more to blame for the war between the two countries 50 years ago, whether the respondent looked unfavorably on Japan for having attacked Pearl Harbor, and if anti-Japanese feelings seemed to be on the rise in the United States. The survey also asked respondents to indicate their level of trust in various institutions of American society, including banks, the military, public schools, the courts, and the federal government, and to rate items such as the quality of available health care. Respondents were also asked to comment on whether they were satisfied with their current residence. Background information on respondents includes political alignment, education, age, race, employment status, income, and sex.

Statistics illustrates the net export value of Machine-tools; sawing machines, for working wood, cork, bone, hard rubber, hard plastics or similar hard materials in the United States from 2007 to 2024 by trade partner.

this chart shows the top 10 countries where it is most difficult to immigrant from, to the US. Taking into consideration visa refusal rate, passport power, green cards per 100k people, and searches per 100k people to come to a final score.

This Gallup poll aims to collect the opinions of Canadians on issues of importance to the country and to the government. This survey focuses on mostly political topics, such as elections and voting, and the influence of the United States over Canada. Respondents were also asked questions so that they could be grouped according to geographic, demographic, and social variables. Topics of interest include: American investment in Canada, the American lifestyle; Canada's dependence on the United States, the federal election; financial dependence on the United States; government policy; how hard people work; religious services; Sunday school; union membership; and voting behaviour. Basic demographics variables are also included.

United States Imports: Machining Centers for Machine Working Hard Materials data was reported at 4.126 USD mn in Jan 2025. This records a decrease from the previous number of 5.302 USD mn for Dec 2024. United States Imports: Machining Centers for Machine Working Hard Materials data is updated monthly, averaging 3.410 USD mn from Jan 2017 (Median) to Jan 2025, with 97 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 9.479 USD mn in Jan 2024 and a record low of 0.159 USD mn in Apr 2017. United States Imports: Machining Centers for Machine Working Hard Materials data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by U.S. Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.JA135: Imports: by Commodity: 6 Digit HS Code: HS 79 to 84.

The New York Times is releasing a series of data files with cumulative counts of coronavirus cases in the United States, at the state and county level, over time. We are compiling this time series data from state and local governments and health departments in an attempt to provide a complete record of the ongoing outbreak.

Since late January, The Times has tracked cases of coronavirus in real time as they were identified after testing. Because of the widespread shortage of testing, however, the data is necessarily limited in the picture it presents of the outbreak.

We have used this data to power our maps and reporting tracking the outbreak, and it is now being made available to the public in response to requests from researchers, scientists and government officials who would like access to the data to better understand the outbreak.

The data begins with the first reported coronavirus case in Washington State on Jan. 21, 2020. We will publish regular updates to the data in this repository.

Statistics illustrates the export volume of Machine-tools; which can carry out different types of machining operations without tool change between such operations, for working wood, cork, bone, hard rubber, hard plastics or similar in Northern America from 2007 to 2024 by trade partner.

Bolivia Imports from United States of Hard rubber in all forms: articles of hard rubber was US$14.91 Thousand during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. Bolivia Imports from United States of Hard rubber in all forms: articles of hard rubber - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on July of 2025.

Statistics illustrates market overview of machine-tools; which can carry out different types of machining operations without tool change between such operations, for working wood, cork, bone, hard rubber, hard plastics or similar in the United States from 2007 to 2024.

Statistics illustrates the import value of Machine-tools; which can carry out different types of machining operations without tool change between such operations, for working wood, cork, bone, hard rubber, hard plastics or similar in Northern America from 2007 to 2024 by trade partner.

Statistics illustrates consumption, production, prices, and trade of Machine-tools; n.e.s. in heading no. 8465, for working wood, cork, bone, hard rubber, hard plastics or similar hard materials in United States Virgin Islands from 2007 to 2024.

Statistics illustrates the import volume of Machine-tools; which can carry out different types of machining operations without tool change between such operations, for working wood, cork, bone, hard rubber, hard plastics or similar in Curacao from 2007 to 2024 by trade partner.

Historical Dataset of Alaska State School For Deaf And Hard Of Hearing is provided by PublicSchoolReview and contain statistics on metrics:Total Students Trends Over Years (2009-2023),Total Classroom Teachers Trends Over Years (2012-2023),Distribution of Students By Grade Trends,Student-Teacher Ratio Comparison Over Years (2012-2023),American Indian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Asian Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2008-2023),Hispanic Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Black Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),White Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2018),Two or More Races Student Percentage Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Diversity Score Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Free Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Reduced-Price Lunch Eligibility Comparison Over Years (2009-2023),Reading and Language Arts Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2010-2022),Math Proficiency Comparison Over Years (2010-2022),Overall School Rank Trends Over Years (2011-2022)

United States Imports from Norway of Hard rubber in all forms: articles of hard rubber was US$3 Thousand during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from Norway of Hard rubber in all forms: articles of hard rubber - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on July of 2025.