A 2024 survey found that over half of U.S. individuals indicated the cost of accessing treatment was the biggest problem facing the national healthcare system. This is much higher than the global average of 32 percent and is in line with the high cost of health care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries. Bureaucracy along with a lack of staff were also considered to be pressing issues. This statistic reveals the share of individuals who said select problems were the biggest facing the health care system in the United States in 2024.

Population Health (BRFSS: HRQOL)

Examining Trends, Disparities and Determinants of Health in the US Population

By Health [source]

About this dataset

The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) offers an expansive collection of data on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) from 1993 to 2010. Over this time period, the Health-Related Quality of Life dataset consists of a comprehensive survey reflecting the health and well-being of non-institutionalized US adults aged 18 years or older. The data collected can help track and identify unmet population health needs, recognize trends, identify disparities in healthcare, determine determinants of public health, inform decision making and policy development, as well as evaluate programs within public healthcare services.

The HRQOL surveillance system has developed a compact set of HRQOL measures such as a summary measure indicating unhealthy days which have been validated for population health surveillance purposes and have been widely implemented in practice since 1993. Within this study's dataset you will be able to access information such as year recorded, location abbreviations & descriptions, category & topic overviews, questions asked in surveys and much more detailed information including types & units regarding data values retrieved from respondents along with their sample sizes & geographical locations involved!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset tracks the Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) from 1993 to 2010 using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). This dataset includes information on the year, location abbreviation, location description, type and unit of data value, sample size, category and topic of survey questions.

Using this dataset on BRFSS: HRQOL data between 1993-2010 will allow for a variety of analyses related to population health needs. The compact set of HRQOL measures can be used to identify trends in population health needs as well as determine disparities among various locations. Additionally, responses to survey questions can be used to inform decision making and program and policy development in public health initiatives.

Research Ideas

• Analyzing trends in HRQOL over the years by location to identify disparities in health outcomes between different populations and develop targeted policy interventions.
• Developing new models for predicting HRQOL indicators at a regional level, and using this information to inform medical practice and public health implementation efforts.
• Using the data to understand differences between states in terms of their HRQOL scores and establish best practices for healthcare provision based on that understanding, including areas such as access to care, preventative care services availability, etc

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

See the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: rows.csv | Column name | Description | |:-------------------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------| | Year | Year of survey. (Integer) | | LocationAbbr | Abbreviation of location. (String) | | LocationDesc | Description of location. (String) | | Category | Category of survey. (String) | | Topic | Topic of survey. (String) | | Question | Question asked in survey. (String) | | DataSource | Source of data. (String) | | Data_Value_Unit | Unit of data value. (String) | | Data_Value_Type | Type of data value. (String) | | Data_Value_Footnote_Symbol | Footnote symbol for data value. (String) | | Data_Value_Std_Err | Standard error of the data value. (Float) | | Sample_Size | Sample size used in sample. (Integer) | | Break_Out | Break out categories used. (String) | | Break_Out_Category | Type break out assessed. (String) | | **GeoLocation*...

US: Mortality Rate: Adult: Female: per 1000 Female Adults data was reported at 80.229 Ratio in 2015. This records an increase from the previous number of 79.191 Ratio for 2014. US: Mortality Rate: Adult: Female: per 1000 Female Adults data is updated yearly, averaging 94.263 Ratio from Dec 1960 (Median) to 2015, with 56 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 130.823 Ratio in 1968 and a record low of 77.137 Ratio in 2010. US: Mortality Rate: Adult: Female: per 1000 Female Adults data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Adult mortality rate, female, is the probability of dying between the ages of 15 and 60--that is, the probability of a 15-year-old female dying before reaching age 60, if subject to age-specific mortality rates of the specified year between those ages.; ; (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects: 2017 Revision. (2) University of California, Berkeley, and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research. The Human Mortality Database.; Weighted average;

Context

Health care in the United States is provided by many distinct organizations. Health care facilities are largely owned and operated by private sector businesses. 58% of US community hospitals are non-profit, 21% are government owned, and 21% are for-profit. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States spent more on healthcare per capita ($9,403), and more on health care as percentage of its GDP (17.1%), than any other nation in 2014. Many different datasets are needed to portray different aspects of healthcare in US like disease prevalences, pharmaceuticals and drugs, Nutritional data of different food products available in US. Such data is collected by surveys (or otherwise) conducted by Centre of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Foods and Drugs Administration, Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). These datasets can be used to properly review demographics and diseases, determining start ratings of healthcare providers, different drugs and their compositions as well as package informations for different diseases and for food quality. We often want such information and finding and scraping such data can be a huge hurdle. So, Here an attempt is made to make available all US healthcare data at one place to download from in csv files.

Content

• Nhanes Survey (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) - The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a program of studies designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. The survey is unique in that it combines interviews and physical examinations. NHANES is a major program of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). NCHS is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and has the responsibility for producing vital and health statistics for the Nation. The NHANES interview includes demographic, socioeconomic, dietary, and health-related questions. The examination component consists of medical, dental, and physiological measurements, as well as laboratory tests administered by highly trained medical personnel. The diseases, medical conditions, and health indicators to be studied include: Anemia, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Environmental exposures, Eye diseases, Hearing loss, Infectious diseases, Kidney disease, Nutrition, Obesity, Oral health, Osteoporosis, Physical fitness and physical functioning, Reproductive history and sexual behavior, Respiratory disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema), Sexually transmitted diseases, Vision. 10000 individuals are surveyed to represent US statistics. Five files in this datasets represent current recent Nhanes data -
  Nhanes_2005_2006.csv
  Nhanes_2007_2008.csv
  Nhanes_2009_2010.csv
  Nhanes_2011_2012.csv
  Nhanes_2013_2014.csv
  
  • Data fields' description -
    • Nhanes_2005_2006.csv - Demographic, Dietary, Examinations, Laboratory
    • Nhanes_2007_2008.csv - Demographic, Dietary, Examinations, Laboratory
    • Nhanes_2009_2010.csv - Demographic, Dietary, Examinations, Laboratory
    • Nhanes_2011_2012.csv - Demographic, Dietary, [Examinations](http://https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/search/variab...

US: Improved Sanitation Facilities: Urban: % of Urban Population with Access data was reported at 100.000 % in 2015. This stayed constant from the previous number of 100.000 % for 2014. US: Improved Sanitation Facilities: Urban: % of Urban Population with Access data is updated yearly, averaging 99.900 % from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2015, with 26 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 100.000 % in 2015 and a record low of 99.800 % in 1996. US: Improved Sanitation Facilities: Urban: % of Urban Population with Access data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Access to improved sanitation facilities, urban, refers to the percentage of the urban population using improved sanitation facilities. Improved sanitation facilities are likely to ensure hygienic separation of human excreta from human contact. They include flush/pour flush (to piped sewer system, septic tank, pit latrine), ventilated improved pit (VIP) latrine, pit latrine with slab, and composting toilet.; ; WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme (JMP) for Water Supply and Sanitation (http://www.wssinfo.org/).; Weighted average;

This study is the fourth in a series that uses the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data to examine the relationship between SNAP participation and indicators of diet quality, nutrition, and health. As in previous studies, this study compares SNAP participants with income-eligible and higher income nonparticipants, by age and gender.

In the United States in 2022, the majority of diagnostic vendors only shared data to health information exchanges (HIE) on a regional or state level. While around ** percent said they contributed data to a private HIE.

Contains data from World Health Organization's data portal covering various indicators (one per resource).

This dataset contains model-based ZIP Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level estimates for the PLACES project by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. It represents a first-of-its kind effort to release information uniformly on this large scale. Data sources used to generate these model-based estimates include Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) 2019 or 2018 data, Census Bureau 2010 population estimates, and American Community Survey (ACS) 2015–2019 or 2014–2018 estimates. The 2021 release uses 2019 BRFSS data for 22 measures and 2018 BRFSS data for 7 measures (all teeth lost, dental visits, mammograms, cervical cancer screening, colorectal cancer screening, core preventive services among older adults, and sleeping less than 7 hours a night). Seven measures are based on the 2018 BRFSS data because the relevant questions are only asked every other year in the BRFSS. This data only covers the health of adults (people 18 and over) in East Baton Rouge Parish. All estimates lie within a 95% confidence interval.

Age-adjustment mortality rates are rates of deaths that are computed using a statistical method to create a metric based on the true death rate so that it can be compared over time for a single population (i.e. comparing 2006-2008 to 2010-2012), as well as enable comparisons across different populations with possibly different age distributions in their populations (i.e. comparing Hispanic residents to Asian residents). Age adjustment methods applied to Montgomery County rates are consistent with US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) as well as Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene’s Vital Statistics Administration (DHMH VSA). PHS Planning and Epidemiology receives an annual data file of Montgomery County resident deaths registered with Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene’s Vital Statistics Administration (DHMH VSA). Using SAS analytic software, MCDHHS standardizes, aggregates, and calculates age-adjusted rates for each of the leading causes of death category consistent with state and national methods and by subgroups based on age, gender, race, and ethnicity combinations. Data are released in compliance with Data Use Agreements between DHMH VSA and MCDHHS. This dataset will be updated Annually.

This dataset presents the age-adjusted death rates for the 10 leading causes of death in the United States beginning in 1999. Data are based on information from all resident death certificates filed in the 50 states and the District of Columbia using demographic and medical characteristics. Age-adjusted death rates (per 100,000 population) are based on the 2000 U.S. standard population. Populations used for computing death rates after 2010 are postcensal estimates based on the 2010 census, estimated as of July 1, 2010. Rates for census years are based on populations enumerated in the corresponding censuses. Rates for non-census years before 2010 are revised using updated intercensal population estimates and may differ from rates previously published. Causes of death classified by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD–10) are ranked according to the number of deaths assigned to rankable causes. Cause of death statistics are based on the underlying cause of death. SOURCES CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm); and CDC WONDER (see http://wonder.cdc.gov). REFERENCES National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics data available. Mortality multiple cause files. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm. Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek KD, Curtin SC, and Arias E. Deaths: Final data for 2015. National vital statistics reports; vol 66. no. 6. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr66/nvsr66_06.pdf.

The percentage of people in the United States with health insurance has increased over the past decade with a noticeably sharp increase in 2014 when the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was enacted. As of 2024, around ** percent of people in the United States had some form of health insurance, compared to around ** percent in 2010. Despite the increases in the percentage of insured people in the U.S., there were still over ** million people in the United States without health insurance as of 2024. Insurance coverage Health insurance in the United States consists of different private and public insurance programs such as those provided by private employers or those provided publicly through Medicare and Medicaid. Almost half of the insured population in the United States were insured privately through an employer as of 2021, while **** percent of people were insured through Medicaid, and **** percent through Medicare . The Affordable Care Act The Affordable Care Act (ACA), enacted in 2014, has significantly reduced the number of uninsured people in the United States. In 2014, the percentage of U.S. individuals with health insurance increased to almost ** percent. Furthermore, the percentage of people without health insurance reached an all time low in 2022. Public opinion on healthcare reform in the United States remains an ongoing political issue with public opinion consistently divided.

According to a survey carried out in the United States in 2023, willingness to share health data dropped when compared to the same survey question asked in 2020 and 2022. In 2023, ** percent of adults would share health data with a doctor or clinician, while in 2020, ** percent of respondents were willing to share health data with doctors or clinicians.

United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health data was reported at 21.365 % in 2014. This records a decrease from the previous number of 21.927 % for 2013. United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health data is updated yearly, averaging 23.966 % from Dec 1995 (Median) to 2014, with 20 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 26.623 % in 1998 and a record low of 21.365 % in 2014. United States US: Out-of-Pocket Health Expenditure: % of Private Expenditure on Health data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Out of pocket expenditure is any direct outlay by households, including gratuities and in-kind payments, to health practitioners and suppliers of pharmaceuticals, therapeutic appliances, and other goods and services whose primary intent is to contribute to the restoration or enhancement of the health status of individuals or population groups. It is a part of private health expenditure.; ; World Health Organization Global Health Expenditure database (see http://apps.who.int/nha/database for the most recent updates).; Weighted average;

Between January and September 2024, healthcare organizations in the United States saw 491 large-scale data breaches, resulting in the loss of over 500 records. This figure has increased significantly in the last decade. To date, the highest number of large-scale data breaches in the U.S. healthcare sector was recorded in 2023, with a reported 745 cases.

Mortality Statistics in US Cities

Deaths by Age and Cause of Death in 2016

By Health [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains mortality statistics for 122 U.S. cities in 2016, providing detailed information about all deaths that occurred due to any cause, including pneumonia and influenza. The data is voluntarily reported from cities with populations of 100,000 or more, and it includes the place of death and the week during which the death certificate was filed. Data is provided broken down by age group and includes a flag indicating the reliability of each data set to help inform analysis. Each row also provides longitude and latitude information for each reporting area in order to make further analysis easier. These comprehensive mortality statistics are invaluable resources for tracking disease trends as well as making comparisons between different areas across the country in order to identify public health risks quickly and effectively

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset contains mortality rates for 122 U.S. cities in 2016, including deaths by age group and cause of death. The data can be used to study various trends in mortality and contribute to the understanding of how different diseases impact different age groups across the country.

In order to use the data, firstly one has to identify which variables they would like to use from this dataset. These include: reporting area; MMWR week; All causes by age greater than 65 years; All causes by age 45-64 years; All causes by age 25-44 years; All causes by age 1-24 years; All causes less than 1 year old; Pneumonia and Influenza total fatalities; Location (1 & 2); flag indicating reliability of data.

Once you have identified the variables that you are interested in,you will need to filter the dataset so that it only includes relevant information for your analysis or research purposes. For example, if you are looking at trends between different ages, then all you would need is information on those 3 specific cause groups (greater than 65, 45-64 and 25-44). You can do this using a selection tool that allows you to pick only certain columns from your data set or an excel filter tool if your data is stored as a csv file type .

Next step is preparing your data - it’s important for efficient analysis also helpful when there are too many variables/columns which can confuse our analysis process – eliminate unnecessary columns, rename column labels where needed etc ... In addition , make sure we clean up any missing values / outliers / incorrect entries before further investigation .Remember , outliers or corrupt entries may lead us into incorrect conclusions upon analyzing our set ! Once we complete the cleaning steps , now its safe enough transit into drawing insights !

The last step involves using statistical methods such as linear regression with multiple predictors or descriptive statistical measures such as mean/median etc ..to draw key insights based on analysis done so far and generate some actionable points !

With these steps taken care off , now its easier for anyone who decides dive into another project involving this particular dataset with added advantage formulated out of existing work done over our previous investigations!

Research Ideas

• Creating population health profiles for cities in the U.S.
• Tracking public health trends across different age groups
• Analyzing correlations between mortality and geographical locations

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.

Columns

File: rows.csv | Column name | Description | |:--------------------------------------------|:-----------------------------------...

Mental Illness Prevalence Across the US

Substate Level Estimates

By Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Organization [source]

About this dataset

This dataset contains estimates of serious mental illness in the US by state and substate region from 2012-2014. This data helps to understand better the mental health disparities that exist between states and different regions within states. By looking at this data, researchers can identify the parts of the country with particularly high or low rates of serious mental illness, which can help prioritize resources for affected areas.

The dataset includes estimates along with 95% confidence intervals based on a survey-weighted hierarchical Bayes estimation approach and are generated by Markov Chain Monte Carlo techniques. Columns labeled Map Group can be used to distinguish substate regions included in corresponding maps as well as numerical order for sorting original sort order. For definitions in Substate Region, refer to the National Survey on Drug Use and Health's Substate Region Definitions found here: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/NSDUHsubstateRegionDefs2014/NSDUHsubstateRegionDefs2014.pdf

This reliable information is provided by SAMHSA, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality through their National Survey on Drug Use and Health from 2012-2014; helping us gain insights into America’s overall mental health picture – revealing more about where help is needed most urgently so that we can take steps towards a healthier future for all Americans!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

Welcome to this dataset! This dataset contains estimates of Serious Mental Illnesses in the United States by state and substate region from 2012 to 2014. It is designed for researchers, analysts, and data scientists looking for information about the prevalence of Serious Mental Illnesses across the US.

Research Ideas

• Performing a trend analysis to identify changes in the estimates of serious mental illnesses over time and across different geographic regions.
• Exploring disparities in serious mental illnesses among certain minority groups or deprived socio-economic subgroups by comparing estimates at the substate level.
• Developing targeted public health strategies and interventions for states with higher than average rates of serious mental illness prevalence

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: Dataset copyright by authors - You are free to: - Share - copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially. - Adapt - remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. - You must: - Give appropriate credit - Provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. - ShareAlike - You must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original. - Keep intact - all notices that refer to this license, including copyright notices.

Columns

File: 2012-2014_Substate_SAE_Table_24.csv | Column name | Description | |:--------------------|:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Order | A numerical order that can be used to sort the data back to its original order. (Numeric) | | State | The US state associated with the data. (String) | | Substate Region | The substate region associated with the data. (String) | | 95% CI (Lower) | The lower bound of the 95 percent confidence interval for the estimated number of people with serious mental illness in the region. (Numeric) | | 95% CI (Upper) | The upper bound of the 95 percent confidence interval for the estimated number of people with serious mental illness in the region. (Numeric) | | Map Group | A numerical value which can distinguish between different substate regions included in the maps. (Numeric) |

...

United States US: Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population data was reported at 0.110 Ratio in 2019. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.110 Ratio for 2018. United States US: Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population data is updated yearly, averaging 0.120 Ratio from Dec 2010 (Median) to 2019, with 10 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.130 Ratio in 2012 and a record low of 0.110 Ratio in 2019. United States US: Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Social: Health Statistics. Number of new HIV infections among uninfected populations expressed per 1,000 uninfected population in the year before the period.;UNAIDS estimates.;Weighted average;This is the Sustainable Development Goal indicator 3.3.1 [https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/].

This dataset of U.S. mortality trends since 1900 highlights trends in age-adjusted death rates for five selected major causes of death.

Age-adjusted death rates (deaths per 100,000) after 1998 are calculated based on the 2000 U.S. standard population. Populations used for computing death rates for 2011–2017 are postcensal estimates based on the 2010 census, estimated as of July 1, 2010. Rates for census years are based on populations enumerated in the corresponding censuses. Rates for noncensus years between 2000 and 2010 are revised using updated intercensal population estimates and may differ from rates previously published. Data on age-adjusted death rates prior to 1999 are taken from historical data (see References below).

Revisions to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) over time may result in discontinuities in cause-of-death trends.

SOURCES

CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, historical data, 1900-1998 (see https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_historical_data.htm); CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System, mortality data (see http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/deaths.htm); and CDC WONDER (see http://wonder.cdc.gov).

REFERENCES

1. National Center for Health Statistics, Data Warehouse. Comparability of cause-of-death between ICD revisions. 2008. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/comparability_icd.htm.

2. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics data available. Mortality multiple cause files. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/vitalstatsonline.htm.

3. Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Arias E. Deaths: Final data for 2017. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 68 no 9. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_09-508.pdf.

4. Arias E, Xu JQ. United States life tables, 2017. National Vital Statistics Reports; vol 68 no 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr68/nvsr68_07-508.pdf.

5. National Center for Health Statistics. Historical Data, 1900-1998. 2009. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality_historical_data.htm.

CDC's Division of Population Health provides a cross-cutting set of 115 indicators developed by consensus among CDC, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, and the National Association of Chronic Disease Directors. These indicators allow states and territories to uniformly define, collect, and report chronic disease data that are important to public health practice in their area. In addition to providing access to state-specific indicator data, the CDI web site serves as a gateway to additional information and data resources.