The global healthcare data collection and labeling market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in healthcare. The rising volume of patient data generated through electronic health records (EHRs), wearable devices, and medical imaging necessitates efficient and accurate data labeling for training sophisticated AI algorithms. This demand fuels the market's expansion. While precise market sizing figures require further details, a reasonable estimate, considering the current growth trajectory of related AI and healthcare sectors, would place the 2025 market value at approximately $2 billion, with a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15-20% projected through 2033. Key drivers include the need for improved diagnostic accuracy, personalized medicine, and drug discovery, all heavily reliant on high-quality labeled datasets. Furthermore, regulatory compliance mandates around data privacy and security are indirectly driving the adoption of specialized data collection and labeling services, ensuring data integrity and patient confidentiality. The market is segmented based on data type (imaging, text, sensor data), labeling method (supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised), service type (data annotation, data augmentation, model training), and end-user (hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, research institutions). Companies like Alegion, Appen, and iMerit are key players, offering a range of services to meet diverse healthcare data needs. However, challenges remain, including data heterogeneity, scalability concerns related to large datasets, and the potential for bias in labeled data. Addressing these challenges requires continuous innovation in data collection methodologies, advanced labeling techniques, and the development of robust quality control measures. Future market growth will hinge on the successful integration of advanced technologies like synthetic data generation and automated labeling tools, aiming to reduce costs and accelerate the development of AI-powered healthcare solutions.

The Research and Development Survey (RANDS) is a platform designed for conducting survey question evaluation and statistical research. RANDS is an ongoing series of surveys from probability-sampled commercial survey panels used for methodological research at the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). RANDS estimates are generated using an experimental approach that differs from the survey design approaches generally used by NCHS, including possible biases from different response patterns and sampling frames as well as increased variability from lower sample sizes. Use of the RANDS platform allows NCHS to produce more timely data than would be possible using traditional data collection methods. RANDS is not designed to replace NCHS’ higher quality, core data collections. Below are experimental estimates of reduced access to healthcare for three rounds of RANDS during COVID-19. Data collection for the three rounds of RANDS during COVID-19 occurred between June 9, 2020 and July 6, 2020, August 3, 2020 and August 20, 2020, and May 17, 2021 and June 30, 2021. Information needed to interpret these estimates can be found in the Technical Notes. RANDS during COVID-19 included questions about unmet care in the last 2 months during the coronavirus pandemic. Unmet needs for health care are often the result of cost-related barriers. The National Health Interview Survey, conducted by NCHS, is the source for high-quality data to monitor cost-related health care access problems in the United States. For example, in 2018, 7.3% of persons of all ages reported delaying medical care due to cost and 4.8% reported needing medical care but not getting it due to cost in the past year. However, cost is not the only reason someone might delay or not receive needed medical care. As a result of the coronavirus pandemic, people also may not get needed medical care due to cancelled appointments, cutbacks in transportation options, fear of going to the emergency room, or an altruistic desire to not be a burden on the health care system, among other reasons. The Household Pulse Survey (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/pulse/reduced-access-to-care.htm), an online survey conducted in response to the COVID-19 pandemic by the Census Bureau in partnership with other federal agencies including NCHS, also reports estimates of reduced access to care during the pandemic (beginning in Phase 1, which started on April 23, 2020). The Household Pulse Survey reports the percentage of adults who delayed medical care in the last 4 weeks or who needed medical care at any time in the last 4 weeks for something other than coronavirus but did not get it because of the pandemic. The experimental estimates on this page are derived from RANDS during COVID-19 and show the percentage of U.S. adults who were unable to receive medical care (including urgent care, surgery, screening tests, ongoing treatment, regular checkups, prescriptions, dental care, vision care, and hearing care) in the last 2 months. Technical Notes: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/rands/reduced-access-to-care.htm#limitations

The Healthcare Data Collection And Labeling Market size was valued at USD 665.3 million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 3525.73 million by 2032, exhibiting a CAGR of 26.9 % during the forecasts period. Health care data acquisition and annotation market entails the process of acquiring, sorting and tagging, health care data for different uses including, studies, diagnosis, and enhancing patient care. This data is very helpful for training up machine learning algorithms in the field of health care services including diagnosis of diseases, treatment, drug prescription and in research on the spread of diseases. Current trends depict a rising need for superior quality labeled dataset to enhance the performance of the health-care AI systems. Some of the key uses of this imaging technique are; diagnosis, electronic personal health record, and molecular biology for drug development. Growing adoption of healthcare data across medical fields and the usage of AI and digital records open a pathway in the market for better-annotated datasets.

This data collection contains de-identified clinical health service utilisation data from Bendigo Health and the General Practitioners Practices associated with the Loddon Mallee Murray Medicare Local. The collection also includes associated population health data from the ABS, AIHW and the Municipal Health Plans. Health researchers have a major interest in how clinical data can be used to monitor population health and health care in rural and regional Australia through analysing a broad range of factors shown to impact the health of different populations. The Population Health data collection provides students, managers, clinicians and researchers the opportunity to use clinical data in the study of population health, including the analysis of health risk factors, disease trends and health care utilisation and outcomes.Temporal range (data time period):2004 to 2014Spatial coverage:Bendigo Latitude -36.758711200000010000, Bendigo Longitude 144.283745899999990000

This study was undertaken for the purpose of providing baseline national indicators of access to health care for an evaluation of a program of hospital-based primary care group practices funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The main objective of that large-scale social experiment was to improve access to medical care for the population in areas served by the groups. The access framework and questionnaires designed for the study were developed to provide empirical indicators of the concept that could be used to monitor progress toward this objective. Five data collection instruments were used by the study: the Household Enumeration Folder, the Main Questionnaire, the Health Opinions Questionnaire, the Physician Supplement, and the Hospital/Extended Care Supplement. The Household Enumeration Folder collected basic demographic information on all household members and served as a screener for the episode of illness and minority oversamples. The Main Questionnaire collected information on disability, symptoms of illness, episodes of illness, socioeconomic and demographic characteristics, and access to health care: sources of medical care utilized, problems associated with access to sources of care (e.g., transportation, parking, waiting time for an appointment), satisfaction with medical services received, utilization of medical diagnostic procedures, dental care, and eye care, and insurance coverage and out-of-pocket expenditures for health care. Respondents' opinions concerning the medical care that they received were gauged by the Health Opinions Questionnaire. The Physician Supplement and the Hospital/Extended Care Supplement collected information on physicians contacted and facilities utilized in connection with reported episodes of illness. File 1, File 2, and File 3 constitute the data files for this collection. File 1 comprises data from the Household Enumeration Folder, the Main Questionnaire, and the Health Opinions Questionnaire, plus variables from secondary sources, such as characteristics, derived from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile, of physicians named as caregivers by respondents, and medical shortage data, from various sources, for the respondent's county of residence. File 2 contains the data from the Physician Supplement, while File 3 provides the data collected by the Hospital/Extended Care Supplement.

The global medical equipment data collector market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), the rising prevalence of chronic diseases necessitating enhanced patient monitoring, and the expanding demand for real-time data analysis in healthcare settings. The market is segmented by application (hospitals and clinics) and type (handheld and fixed), with handheld devices gaining traction due to their portability and ease of use in various medical environments. Hospitals currently dominate the application segment, owing to their higher data collection needs and sophisticated infrastructure. However, the clinic segment is expected to witness significant growth due to increasing adoption of data-driven approaches in outpatient care. Technological advancements, such as the integration of advanced sensors and improved data security features, are further fueling market expansion. Competition is intense, with established players like Zebra Technologies and CipherLab alongside emerging companies like Ciontek and Supoin vying for market share through product innovation and strategic partnerships. The market’s geographical distribution shows a concentration in North America and Europe, primarily due to advanced healthcare infrastructure and high adoption rates. However, Asia-Pacific is projected to exhibit the fastest growth, fueled by rising healthcare expenditure and increasing digitalization efforts in developing economies. Regulatory changes related to data privacy and interoperability are likely to influence market dynamics in the coming years. The market is anticipated to maintain a steady CAGR, resulting in significant market expansion throughout the forecast period (2025-2033). The restraints to market growth primarily involve the high initial investment costs associated with implementing data collection systems, concerns regarding data security and patient privacy, and the need for substantial training and support for healthcare professionals in utilizing the technology effectively. However, these challenges are being progressively addressed through the development of cost-effective solutions, robust security protocols, and comprehensive training programs. Furthermore, the increasing availability of cloud-based solutions and data analytics platforms is simplifying data management and accessibility, driving wider adoption. The overall market outlook is positive, with continued growth driven by factors like increasing government initiatives promoting digital healthcare, advancements in wireless technologies, and the burgeoning need for improved operational efficiency in healthcare facilities.

Patients often provide untruthful information about their health to avoid embarrassment, evade treatment, or prevent financial loss. Privacy disclosures (e.g. HIPAA) intended to dissuade privacy concerns may actually increase patient lying. We used new mouse tracking-based technology to detect lies through mouse movement (distance and time to response) and patient answer adjustment in an online controlled study of 611 potential patients, randomly assigned to one of six treatments. Treatments differed in the notices patients received before health information was requested, including notices about privacy, benefits of truthful disclosure, and risks of inaccurate disclosure. Increased time or distance of device mouse movement and greater adjustment of answers indicate less truthfulness. Mouse tracking revealed a significant overall effect (p < 0.001) by treatment on the time to reach their final choice. The control took the least time indicating greater truthfulness and the privacy + risk group took the longest indicating the least truthfulness. Privacy, risk, and benefit disclosure statements led to greater lying. These differences were moderated by gender. Mouse tracking results largely confirmed the answer adjustment lie detection method with an overall treatment effect (p < .0001) and gender differences (p < .0001) on truthfulness. Privacy notices led to decreased patient honesty. Privacy notices should perhaps be administered well before personal health disclosure is requested to minimize patient untruthfulness. Mouse tracking and answer adjustment appear to be healthcare lie-detection methods to enhance optimal diagnosis and treatment.

The global healthcare data collection and labeling market size was valued at USD 1.11 billion in 2024 and is likely to cross USD 21.94 billion by 2037, expanding at more than 25.8% CAGR during the forecast period i.e., between 2025-2037. North America industry is estimated to account for largest revenue share of 37.8% by 2037, owing to utilizing state-of-the-art tools such as artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to improve efficiency and accuracy in data labeling and annotation.

Uncover Market Research Intellect's latest Healthcare Data Collection And Labeling Market Report, valued at USD 2.5 billion in 2024, expected to rise to USD 6.8 billion by 2033 at a CAGR of 14.5% from 2026 to 2033.

To effectively utilise hospital beds, operating rooms (OR) and other treatment spaces, it is necessary to precisely plan patient admissions and treatments in advance. As patient treatment and recovery times are unequal and uncertain, this is not easy. In response a sophisticated flexible job-shop scheduling (FJSS) model is introduced, whereby patients, beds, hospital wards and health care activities are respectively treated as jobs, single machines, parallel machines and operations. Our approach is novel because an entire hospital is describable and schedulable in one integrated approach. The scheduling model can be used to recompute timings after deviations, delays, postponements and cancellations. It also includes advanced conditions such as activity and machine setup times, transfer times between activities, blocking limitations and no wait conditions, timing and occupancy restrictions, buffering for robustness, fixed activities and sequences, release times and strict deadlines. To solve the FJSS problem, constructive algorithms and hybrid meta-heuristics have been developed. Our numerical testing shows that the proposed solution techniques are capable of solving problems of real world size. This outcome further highlights the value of the scheduling model and its potential for integration into actual hospital information systems.

Big Data Analytics In Healthcare Market size is estimated at USD 37.22 Billion in 2024 and is projected to reach USD 74.82 Billion by 2032, growing at a CAGR of 9.12% from 2026 to 2032.

Big Data Analytics In Healthcare Market: Definition/ Overview

Big Data Analytics in Healthcare, often referred to as health analytics, is the process of collecting, analyzing, and interpreting large volumes of complex health-related data to derive meaningful insights that can enhance healthcare delivery and decision-making. This field encompasses various data types, including electronic health records (EHRs), genomic data, and real-time patient information, allowing healthcare providers to identify patterns, predict outcomes, and improve patient care.

Problem Statement

👉 Download the case studies here

Hospitals and healthcare providers faced challenges in ensuring continuous monitoring of patient vitals, especially for high-risk patients. Traditional monitoring methods often lacked real-time data processing and timely alerts, leading to delayed responses and increased hospital readmissions. The healthcare provider needed a solution to monitor patient health continuously and deliver actionable insights for improved care.

Challenge

Implementing an advanced patient monitoring system involved overcoming several challenges:

Collecting and analyzing real-time data from multiple IoT-enabled medical devices.

Ensuring accurate health insights while minimizing false alarms.

Integrating the system seamlessly with hospital workflows and electronic health records (EHR).

Solution Provided

A comprehensive patient monitoring system was developed using IoT-enabled medical devices and AI-based monitoring systems. The solution was designed to:

Continuously collect patient vital data such as heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen levels, and temperature.

Analyze data in real-time to detect anomalies and provide early warnings for potential health issues.

Send alerts to healthcare professionals and caregivers for timely interventions.

Development Steps

Data Collection

Deployed IoT-enabled devices such as wearable monitors, smart sensors, and bedside equipment to collect patient data continuously.

Preprocessing

Cleaned and standardized data streams to ensure accurate analysis and integration with hospital systems.

AI Model Development

Built machine learning models to analyze vital trends and detect abnormalities in real-time

Validation

Tested the system in controlled environments to ensure accuracy and reliability in detecting health issues.

Deployment

Implemented the solution in hospitals and care facilities, integrating it with EHR systems and alert mechanisms for seamless operation.

Continuous Monitoring & Improvement

Established a feedback loop to refine models and algorithms based on real-world data and healthcare provider feedback.

Results

Enhanced Patient Care

Real-time monitoring and proactive alerts enabled healthcare professionals to provide timely interventions, improving patient outcomes.

Early Detection of Health Issues

The system detected potential health complications early, reducing the severity of conditions and preventing critical events.

Reduced Hospital Readmissions

Continuous monitoring helped manage patient health effectively, leading to a significant decrease in readmission rates.

Improved Operational Efficiency

Automation and real-time insights reduced the burden on healthcare staff, allowing them to focus on critical cases.

Scalable Solution

The system adapted seamlessly to various healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics, and home care environments.

The CarePrecise U.S. HCP/HCO Collection Dataset includes deep data on all 6.7 million U.S. HIPAA-covered healthcare practitioners and organizations. Monthly full updates. Includes linkages between the individual practitioners and their practice groups, hospitals, and hospital systems. Licensing plans are available for basic (internal use), derivative products, and redistribution. Data updates are delivered quarterly or monthly to suit customer need; FTP push is available, standard delivery is via CDN. Single download for evaluation is available. CarePrecise is a leader in the fields of HCP/HCO data, supplying provider data to the industry since 2008. Note regarding pricing: The Collection price shown in Pricing is separate from email addresses. Email addresses are priced as low as $0.075 per, based on volume. Pricing shown is without derivative product (DP) licensing for use in web applications; DP license ranges in price from $1,900/year to $9,000/year on top of data purchase, based on application and overall exposure estimate. DP license is sold in two-year term and requires a license agreement.

The Clinical Questions Collection is a repository of questions that have been collected between 1991 – 2003 from healthcare providers in clinical settings across the country. The questions have been submitted by investigators who wish to share their data with other researchers. This dataset is no-longer updated with new content. The collection is used in developing approaches to clinical and consumer-health question answering, as well as researching information needs of clinicians and the language they use to express their information needs. All files are formatted in XML.

As of 2023, ** percent of respondents in Denmark said they collected health data via mobile apps, while around a quarter in the country also collected health data with a wearable device. Across all the Nordic countries, with the exception of Iceland, mobile apps were the most common way to collect health data.

Numerous studies make extensive use of healthcare data, including human materials and clinical information, and acknowledge its significance. However, limitations in data collection methods can impact the quality of healthcare data obtained from multiple institutions. In order to secure high-quality data related to human materials, research focused on data quality is necessary. This study validated the quality of data collected in 2020 from 16 institutions constituting the Korea Biobank Network using 104 validation rules. The validation rules were developed based on the DQ4HEALTH model and were divided into four dimensions: completeness, validity, accuracy, and uniqueness. Korea Biobank Network collects and manages human materials and clinical information from multiple biobanks, and is in the process of developing a common data model for data integration. The results of the data quality verification revealed an error rate of 0.74%. Furthermore, an analysis of the data from each institution was performed to examine the relationship between the institution’s characteristics and error count. The results from a chi-square test indicated that there was an independent correlation between each institution and its error count. To confirm this correlation between error counts and the characteristics of each institution, a correlation analysis was conducted. The results, shown in a graph, revealed the relationship between factors that had high correlation coefficients and the error count. The findings suggest that the data quality was impacted by biases in the evaluation system, including the institution’s IT environment, infrastructure, and the number of collected samples. These results highlight the need to consider the scalability of research quality when evaluating clinical epidemiological information linked to human materials in future validation studies of data quality.

Healthcare Provider Data Management Solution Market Outlook

The global Healthcare Provider Data Management Solution market size was valued at approximately USD 3.2 billion in 2023 and is expected to reach around USD 8.5 billion by 2032, growing at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 11.5% during the forecast period. This robust growth can be attributed to the increasing volume of healthcare data generated, the rising need for efficient data management systems, and the growing emphasis on improving patient outcomes and operational efficiency.

One of the primary growth factors driving the Healthcare Provider Data Management Solution market is the surge in healthcare data generation. The proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs), wearables, and other digital health tools has led to an exponential increase in the volume of healthcare data. This data, encompassing patient history, diagnostic information, treatment plans, and more, requires efficient management systems to ensure its accessibility, accuracy, and security. Additionally, the integration of data from various sources facilitates better patient care and informed decision-making, further driving the demand for advanced data management solutions.

Another significant growth factor is the ongoing digital transformation within the healthcare sector. Organizations are increasingly adopting advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics to enhance their data management capabilities. These technologies enable healthcare providers to derive actionable insights from vast datasets, optimize operational processes, and improve patient outcomes. Moreover, the implementation of cloud-based solutions offers scalability, flexibility, and cost-efficiency, making it an attractive option for healthcare providers of all sizes.

Furthermore, regulatory requirements and data privacy concerns are fueling the adoption of healthcare provider data management solutions. Governments and regulatory bodies across the globe have introduced stringent regulations to ensure the security and confidentiality of patient data. Compliance with regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in the United States and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe necessitates the use of robust data management systems. These solutions help healthcare providers maintain compliance, avoid penalties, and build trust with patients.

The regional outlook for the Healthcare Provider Data Management Solution market is also promising. North America holds a significant share of the market, driven by the advanced healthcare infrastructure, high adoption rate of digital technologies, and favorable government initiatives. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, attributed to the expanding healthcare sector, increasing investments in healthcare IT, and growing awareness about the benefits of data management solutions. Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East & Africa are also anticipated to experience substantial growth, supported by ongoing digital transformation efforts and regulatory developments.

The integration of a Healthcare CRM Solution is becoming increasingly vital in the healthcare industry. As healthcare providers strive to enhance patient engagement and streamline communication, CRM solutions offer a comprehensive platform to manage patient interactions and data. These solutions facilitate personalized communication, enabling providers to deliver tailored healthcare experiences. By leveraging CRM systems, healthcare organizations can improve patient satisfaction, foster loyalty, and ultimately drive better health outcomes. Additionally, CRM solutions support the coordination of care by integrating with existing healthcare systems, ensuring that patient information is readily accessible and up-to-date. As the demand for patient-centered care grows, the adoption of Healthcare CRM Solutions is expected to rise, offering significant benefits to both providers and patients.

Component Analysis

In the Healthcare Provider Data Management Solution market, the component segment is bifurcated into software and services. The software segment encompasses various data management tools and platforms designed to streamline data collection, storage, and analysis. These software solutions are integral in managing patient records, financial data, and operational metrics. The increasi

Success.ai’s Healthcare Industry Leads Data and B2B Contact Data for US Healthcare Professionals offers an extensive and verified database tailored to connect businesses with key executives and administrators in the healthcare industry across the United States. With over 170M verified profiles, including work emails and direct phone numbers, this dataset enables precise targeting of decision-makers in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

Backed by AI-driven validation technology for unmatched accuracy and reliability, this contact data empowers your marketing, sales, and recruitment strategies. Designed for industry professionals, our continuously updated profiles provide the actionable insights you need to grow your business in the competitive healthcare sector.

Key Features of Success.ai’s US Healthcare Contact Data:

• Comprehensive Healthcare Sector Coverage Access detailed contact information for professionals across the healthcare spectrum:

Hospital Executives: CEOs, CFOs, and COOs managing top-tier facilities. Healthcare Administrators: Decision-makers driving operational excellence. Medical Professionals: Physicians, specialists, and nurse practitioners. Clinic Managers: Leaders in small and mid-sized healthcare organizations.

• AI-Validated Accuracy and Updates

  99% Verified Accuracy: Our advanced AI technology ensures data reliability for optimal engagement. Real-Time Updates: Profiles are continuously refreshed to maintain relevance and accuracy. Minimized Bounce Rates: Save time and resources by reaching verified contacts.

• Customizable Delivery Options Choose how you access the data to match your business requirements:

API Integration: Connect our data directly to your CRM or sales platform. Flat File Delivery: Receive customized datasets in formats suited to your needs.

Why Choose Success.ai for Healthcare Data?

• Best Price Guarantee We ensure competitive pricing for our verified contact data, offering the most comprehensive and cost-effective solution in the market.

• Compliance-Driven and Ethical Data Our data collection adheres to strict global standards, including HIPAA, GDPR, and CCPA compliance, ensuring secure and ethical usage.

• Strategic Benefits for Your Business Success.ai’s US healthcare professional data unlocks numerous business opportunities:

Targeted Marketing: Develop tailored campaigns aimed at healthcare executives and decision-makers. Efficient Sales Outreach: Engage with key contacts to accelerate your sales process. Recruitment Optimization: Access verified profiles to identify and recruit top talent in the healthcare industry. Market Intelligence: Use detailed firmographic and demographic insights to guide strategic decisions. Partnership Development: Build valuable relationships within the healthcare ecosystem.

• Data Highlights 170M+ Verified Profiles 50M Direct Phone Numbers 700M Global Professional Profiles 70M Verified Company Profiles

Key APIs for Advanced Functionality

• Enrichment API Enhance your existing contact data with real-time updates, ensuring accuracy and relevance for your outreach initiatives.

• Lead Generation API Drive high-quality lead generation efforts by utilizing verified contact information, including work emails and direct phone numbers, for up to 860,000 API calls per day.

• Use Cases

1. Healthcare Marketing Campaigns Target verified executives and administrators to deliver personalized and impactful marketing campaigns.

2. Sales Enablement Connect with key decision-makers in healthcare organizations, ensuring higher conversion rates and shorter sales cycles.

3. Talent Acquisition Source and engage healthcare professionals and administrators with accurate, up-to-date contact information.

4. Strategic Partnerships Foster collaborations with healthcare institutions and professionals to expand your business network.

5. Industry Analysis Leverage enriched contact data to gain insights into the US healthcare market, helping you refine your strategies.

• What Sets Success.ai Apart?

Verified Accuracy: AI-driven technology ensures 99% reliability for all contact details. Comprehensive Reach: Covering healthcare professionals from large hospital systems to smaller clinics nationwide. Flexible Access: Customizable data delivery methods tailored to your business needs. Ethical Standards: Fully compliant with healthcare and data protection regulations.

Success.ai’s B2B Contact Data for US Healthcare Professionals is the ultimate solution for connecting with industry leaders, driving impactful marketing campaigns, and optimizing your recruitment strategies. Our commitment to quality, accuracy, and affordability ensures you achieve exceptional results while adhering to ethical and legal standards.

No one beats us on price. Period.

There are many initiatives attempting to harmonize data collection across human clinical studies using common data elements (CDEs). The increased use of CDEs in large prior studies can guide researchers planning new studies. For that purpose, we analyzed the All of Us (AoU) program, an ongoing US study intending to enroll one million participants and serve as a platform for numerous observational analyses. AoU adopted the OMOP Common Data Model to standardize both research (Case Report Form [CRF]) and real-world (imported from Electronic Health Records [EHRs]) data. AoU standardized specific data elements and values by including CDEs from terminologies such as LOINC and SNOMED CT. For this study, we defined all elements from established terminologies as CDEs and all custom concepts created in the Participant Provided Information (PPI) terminology as unique data elements (UDEs). We found 1 033 research elements, 4 592 element-value combinations and 932 distinct values. Most elements were UDEs (869, 84.1%), while most CDEs were from LOINC (103 elements, 10.0%) or SNOMED CT (60, 5.8%). Of the LOINC CDEs, 87 (53.1% of 164 CDEs) originated from previous data collection initiatives, such as PhenX (17 CDEs) and PROMIS (15 CDEs). On a CRF level, The Basics (12 of 21 elements, 57.1%) and Lifestyle (10 of 14, 71.4%) were the only CRFs with multiple CDEs. On a value level, 61.7% of distinct values are from an established terminology. AoU demonstrates the use of the OMOP model for integrating research and routine healthcare data (64 elements in both contexts), which allows for monitoring lifestyle and health changes outside the research setting. The increased inclusion of CDEs in large studies (like AoU) is important in facilitating the use of existing tools and improving the ease of understanding and analyzing the data collected, which is more challenging when using study specific formats.