Introduction

AI in Healthcare Statistics: Artificial intelligence (AI) is swiftly reshaping the healthcare sector, transforming areas such as diagnostics, treatment planning, patient management, and drug development. By analyzing large volumes of data and delivering precise insights, AI is boosting clinical decision-making, enhancing patient outcomes, and optimizing healthcare operations.

Key advancements in machine learning, natural language processing, and other AI technologies are propelling this shift, with healthcare systems worldwide increasingly adopting these innovations to improve efficiency and offer more personalized care. The ongoing potential of AI to refine healthcare delivery is reshaping the industry's future.

Identifying Entities (Diseases, Treatments) in Healthcare Data

Finding diseases and treatments in medical text—because even AI needs a medical degree to understand doctor’s notes! 🩺🤖

📊 Understanding the Dataset

In the contemporary healthcare ecosystem, substantial amounts of unstructured textual facts are generated day by day thru electronic health facts (EHRs), medical doctor’s notes, prescriptions, and medical literature. The potential to extract meaningful insights from this records is critical for improving patient care, advancing clinical studies, and optimizing healthcare offerings. The dataset in cognizance incorporates text-based totally scientific statistics, in which sicknesses and their corresponding remedies are embedded inside unstructured sentences.

The dataset consists of categorized textual content samples, that are classified into: -**Train Sentences**: These sentences comprise clinical records, including patient diagnoses and the treatments administered. -**Train Labels**: The corresponding annotations for the train sentences, marking diseases and remedies as named entities. -**Test Sentences**: Similar to educate sentences however used to evaluate model overall performance. -**Test Labels**: The ground reality labels for the test sentences.

A sneak from the dataset may look as follows:

🔍 Example from Dataset:

Train Sentences:

_ "The patient was a 62 -year -old man with squamous epithelium, who was previously treated with success with a combination of radiation therapy and chemotherapy."

Train Labels:

• Disease: 🦠 lung cancer
• Treatment: 💉 Radiation therapy, chemotherapy

This dataset requires the use of** designated Unit Recognition (NER)** to remove and map and map diseases for related treatments 💊, causing the composition of unarmed medical data for analytical purposes.

⚙️ Dataset Properties

1. Unnecessary medical text: Data set contains free-powered medical notes, where disease and treatment conditions are clearly mentioned. Removing this information without clear mapping is a challenge.
2. Many unit types: Datasets contain different - -called institutions such as diseases, treatment, symptoms and possibly medication.
3. Relevant addiction: Many treatments apply to many diseases, and proper mapping depends on reference. For example, "radiotherapy" is used for different cancers, which makes relevant understanding significantly.
4. Unbalanced data distribution: Some diseases and treatment can be displayed more often than others, to balance model performance requires techniques such as overfalling, sub -sampling or transmission of learning.
5. Domain-specific language: is rich in lesson medical terminology, which requires special preprochet using domain-specific NLP techniques and medical oncology such as UML or SNOM CT.

🚧 Challenges Working with Dataset

• Complex medical vocabulary: Medical texts often use vocals, which require special NLP models that are trained at the clinical company.

• Implicit Relationships: Unlike based datasets, ailment-treatment relationships are inferred from context in preference to explicitly stated.

• Synonyms and Abbreviations: Diseases and treatments can be cited the use of special names (e.G., ‘myocardial infarction’ vs. ‘coronary heart assault’). Handling such versions is vital.

• Noise in Data: Unstructured records may additionally contain irrelevant records, typographical errors, and inconsistencies that affect extraction accuracy.

🛠️ Approach to Extracting Insights from the Dataset

To extract sicknesses and their respective treatments from this dataset, we follow a based NLP pipeline:

1. Data Preprocessing 🧹

• Text Cleaning: Remove needless characters, numbers, and stopwords whilst preserving clinical terms.
• Tokenization: Split sentences into phrases for higher processing.
• Medical Term Standardization: Use area-precise libraries like SciSpacy to standardize synonyms and abbreviations.

2. Named Entity Recognition (NER) Model Development 🤖

• Annotation: Ensure accurate labeling of sicknesses and treatments in the dataset.
• Model Selection: Train a deep-mastering-based version like BioBERT or a rule-based model the use of spaCy.
• Training: Use annotated data to teach a custom NER model that classifies words as sickness or treatment entities.
• Evaluation: Measure precision, bear in mind, and F1-score to evaluate version overall performance.

3. Mapping Diseases to Treatments 🔄

• Contextual Relationship Extraction: Identify which treatment corresponds to which sickness using dependency parsing and courting extraction.
• Dictionary or Tabular Output: Store extracted mappings in a based layout.

Example Output:

| 🦠 Disease | 💉 Treatments | |----------|--------------------...

This page leads to several types of statistics relating to health care and indemnity insurance, grouped by theme. Select the theme that interests you by clicking on it:

• Health care: Statistics on health care providers, cost for health care insurance, patient co-payment, prescriptions, etc.

• Allowances: Statistics on primary work incapacity, invalidity, maternity, birth leave, etc.

• Medical assessment and control: Statistics on the monitoring of health care providers and evaluation of medical practice.

• Administrative control: Statistics on the control of mutual funds and the fight against social fraud.

• Medications: Statistics and specific analyzes on drugs dispensed in public pharmacies: prescription, volume, cost for insurance, etc.

• Frontier workers: Statistics on frontier workers entering and leaving Belgium.

• People affiliated with a health insurance fund: Statistics on the number of people affiliated to a health insurance fund to benefit from healthcare and indemnity insurance in Belgium. Customize your search with our web program.

The Presidents Information Technology Advisory Committee PITAC is appointed by the President to provide independent expert advice on maintaining Americas preeminence in advanced information technology IT. PITAC members are IT leaders in industry and academia with expertise relevant to critical elements of the national information infrastructure such as high-performance computing, large-scale networking, and high-assurance software and systems design. The Committees studies help guide the Administrations efforts to accelerate the development and adoption of information technologies vital for American prosperity in the 21st century.

This data package shows the Physician and Other Healthcare Information like Business Wire Healthcare Press Release Distribution List, Health Professional Shortage Area Mental and Dental Health, Physician Evaluation and Management Medicare Service Events and Physicians Malpractice Payments.

In 2023, 47 percent of the population in Ireland had private health insurance coverage, a slight decrease on the previous year. This statistic represents the share of population with private health insurance coverage in Ireland from 2002 to 2023.

According to a survey conducted in a selection of countries in Latin America in 2024, Argentina was the nation with the highest share of respondents that believed there was readily available information on healthcare services in the country, with ** percent of interviewees agreeing with that statement. Meanwhile, only ** percent of respondents in Peru claimed the same about their local health care system. In 2020, Argentina was one of the Latin American countries with the highest share of GDP allocated to health care. By 2024, health expenditure in the country is expected to reach around ***** percent of the Argentinian gross domestic product (GDP).

AI in Healthcare Statistics: AI in healthcare has been a hot topic for the past few years, and the report says that the industry is expected to reach $187.95 billion by the end of 2030. The fact of this platform in 2023 suggests a huge boom in the market size worldwide, with a compound annual increase rate (CAGR) of 40.1% from 2023 to 2030. The worldwide Artificial intelligence in the healthcare marketplace length changed into worth $20.65 billion in 2023 which has increased from last year. These AI in Healthcare Statistics include insights from various aspects and sources that will provide effective light on the importance of AI in the healthcare industry around the world in recent times. In 2023, the Market share records the gradual adoption of AI which is advancing the sector, and has been observed that 85% of organizations have already implemented AI. Additionally, 1/2 of the executives claimed that AI is indicating a tremendous shift inside and outside the industry. Aid of AI-based healthcare companies used solutions like telemedicine and remote tools and sensors backed by means of large information that can reduce healthcare charges improve access, and promote better outcomes, and performance. Key Takeaways According to AI in Healthcare Statistics, the platform when implemented Artificial Intelligence has experienced a huge increase, with a CAGR of 40.1% from 2023 to 2030 and a global market size expected to attain $187.95 billion by 2030. Around the world, approximately 40% of healthcare industries are regularly using AI and Machine Language in the sector. In 2023, Healthcare executives are increasingly adopting AI in their techniques, and nearly 1/2 of the executives surveyed are already using it. This is being adopted globally, with answers like telemedicine and faraway tools and sensors backed through huge information that could lessen healthcare charges and equitably improve admission to, results, and performance.

This is an overview document covering the Healthcare Workforce as at March 2019 and refers to numbers of staff in three areas: i) Those directly employed by the NHS in Hospital and Community Health Services (HCHS) ii) GPs and their staff iii) A proportion of the staff working in Independent Healthcare Providers (see key facts below). More information on all of these areas are available within the accompanying documents and also via the 'Related Links' section below. This includes a link to the Independent Healthcare Provider Workforce report. We are now reviewing the content, format and purpose of this publication and welcome your feedback. In particular we are considering whether it would be useful to provide something more like a data hub to help guide users around the workforce publications including interactive visualisations rather than continuing with the current publication. Please email us with your comments and suggestions, clearly stating Healthcare Workforce Statistics as the subject heading, via enquiries@nhsdigital.nhs.uk

The amount of global healthcare data is expected to increase dramatically by the year 2020. Despite the growing amount of data, there is not enough storage space to accommodate the data being generated. It is projected that by 2020 there will be 985 exabytes of storage available for healthcare data but there will be 2,314 exabytes of healthcare data generated.

FQHC Location Data

Detailed Address Data on Federally Qualified Health Centers in the US

By US Department of Health and Human Services [source]

About this dataset

This dataset provides comprehensive address-level information on Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) in the United States. FQHCs are community-driven and consumer run organizations that serve populations with limited access to health care, including those who are low-income, uninsured, have a limited grasp of English, migrating and seasonal farm workers, individuals experiencing homelessness, and those living in public housing. In addition to detailed location addressing data such as postal code and city name for each center in the scope of this dataset; users can find optional information about an individual center such as its operator description or the type of population it serves, along with rich backroom management data which includes grant number, grantee name and uniform resource locator (URL). Get familiarized with this essential dataset to help provide quality medical care access to under served communities across the US

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This dataset is an address-level dataset on the locations of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). This dataset includes information on the FQHCs such as name, address, contact information, operating hours per week and grant number. It can be used to locate FQHCs in a particular area and to gain insights into the services they provide.

In order to use this data set, it is important to understand what attributes are included. These are broken down into categories including basic site information (name, telephone number etc.), service description (what population is served etc.), region info (HHS region code etc.) and supplemental info including records for operator and grantee organization.

Once you have identified what fields you are interested in, you can then use this data set for further analysis such as counting how many FQHCs exist within a certain area or determining which states have higher numbers of FQHCs than others. You can also filter by features such as services offered or population served to gain further insights into a particular segment of the FQHC market.

It should also be noted that there may be discrepancies between different sources regarding different fields due to variations in data collection methods; however this dataset is sourced from reliable government datasets making it more accurate than other options. Additionally it contains multiple years of data which provides invaluable insight over time trends that would otherwise not be available through other sources

Research Ideas

• Monitoring health outcomes in a given region and comparing changes over time in terms of FQHC locations, services available, and populations served.
• Analyzing the regional distribution of FQHCs and determining whether there are underserved areas based on population density and access to healthcare services.
• Creating a geographic information system (GIS) map to visualize the FQHC locations across the United States, highlighting rural or underserved areas in need of additional support for healthcare access

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

Unknown License - Please check the dataset description for more information.

Columns

File: SITE_HCC_FCT_DET.csv | Column name | Description | |:-----------------------------------------------------------------|:--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | Site Name | Name of the FQHC. (String) | | UDS Number | Unique identifier assigned by the US Department of Human Services for each FQHC. (Integer) | | Site Telephone Number | Telephone number of the FQHC. (String) | | Site Facsimile Telephone Number | Facsimile telephone number of the FQHC. (String) | | **Administrati...

In the first half of 2024, the highest number of data breaches impacted network servers data. These entities, that usually gather the most sensitive patient data, saw *** data breach incidents. Meanwhile, e-mail services ranked second.

This database is part of the National Medical Information System (NMIS). The National Health Care Practitioner Database (NHCPD) supports Veterans Health Administration Privacy Act requirements by segregating personal information about health care practitioners such as name and social security number from patient information recorded in the National Patient Care Database for Ambulatory Care Reporting and Primary Care Management Module.

The size of the US Health Information Exchange Industry market was valued at USD 0.66 Million in 2023 and is projected to reach USD 1.47 Million by 2032, with an expected CAGR of 12.12% during the forecast period. Recent developments include: In October 2022, Mpowered Health launched its xChange, the United States consumer-mediated healthcare data exchange. The exchange enables health plans, health systems, and other healthcare organizations to request and obtain medical records from consumers with their consent., In March 2022, mpro5 Inc announced its launch into the United States market with a strategy of enabling the collection and leverage of real-time data to simplify the most complex operational challenges in healthcare and hospitals.. Key drivers for this market are: Increasing Demand for Electronic Health Records Resulting in the Expansion of the Market, Government Support via Various Programs and Incentives; Reduction in Healthcare Cost and Improved Efficacy. Potential restraints include: Huge Initial Infrastructural Investment and Slow Return on Investment, Data Privacy and Security Concerns. Notable trends are: The Decentralized/Federated Model is Expected to Hold a Notable Market Share Over the Forecast Period.

Snapshot img { margin: 10px !important; } Healthcare Information Systems Market Size 2025-2029

The healthcare information systems market size is forecast to increase by USD 142.3 billion, at a CAGR of 9.8% between 2024 and 2029.

The global healthcare information systems market is primarily shaped by regulatory mandates requiring advanced digital solutions to break down data silos and improve care coordination. This drives the adoption of compliant electronic health records and healthcare interoperability solution market technologies. The strategic shift toward cloud-based deployment and SaaS models further redefines healthcare it, offering a more scalable and cost-effective operational paradigm. This trend emphasizes the need for systems that support decentralized care delivery and remote patient monitoring tools, transforming how healthcare services are accessed and managed across different settings. The evolution of these systems is critical for enhancing both operational efficiency and patient outcomes.The migration to cloud architectures, while offering significant benefits, introduces the formidable challenge of sophisticated cybersecurity threats. This constant operational and financial drain necessitates immense ongoing investment in defensive measures and incident response planning to protect sensitive medical information. The interconnected nature of modern healthcare services market ecosystems, from the hospital information system to pharmacy information systems, creates a large and attractive attack surface for malicious actors. This makes robust cybersecurity in healthcare a primary consideration for providers as they invest in new healthcare analytics platforms and other digital tools to support patient care.

What will be the Size of the Healthcare Information Systems Market during the forecast period?

Explore in-depth regional segment analysis with market size data - historical 2019 - 2023 and forecasts 2025-2029 - in the full report.
Request Free SampleThe hospital information system and pharmacy information systems are evolving through healthcare it initiatives that prioritize data aggregation and integration. The move toward value-based care models necessitates robust healthcare analytics and clinical workflow optimization. The healthcare cloud computing market is enabling this shift by providing scalable infrastructure for managing patient-generated health data and supporting ehealth software and services market platforms, ensuring data is accessible and actionable across the care continuum.The integration of generative AI and predictive analytics is transforming clinical decision support systems within the broader healthcare information systems market. However, effective data migration and overcoming interoperability hurdles remain critical for success. Ensuring robust cybersecurity in healthcare is essential for protecting patient data access across telemedicine platforms and mobile health applications. The efficacy of population health management systems ultimately hinges on seamless health information exchange and the universal adoption of standardized data formats like FHIR.

How is this Healthcare Information Systems Industry segmented?

The healthcare information systems industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in "USD million" for the period 2025-2029, as well as historical data from 2019 - 2023 for the following segments. ApplicationRevenue cycle managementHospital information systemMedical imaging information systemPharmacy information systemsLaboratory information systemsTechnologyEHRsEMRsMobile healthTelemedicine platformsPopulation health management systemsComponentSoftwareServicesHardwareGeographyNorth AmericaUSCanadaMexicoEuropeGermanyUKFranceThe NetherlandsItalySpainAsiaRest of World (ROW)

By Application Insights

The revenue cycle management segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period.Revenue cycle management systems represent a significant application segment, focused on managing financial workflows from patient registration to final payment collection. These platforms integrate clinical and administrative data to streamline claims processing automation, manage denials, and optimize coding accuracy optimization. The increasing complexity of modern reimbursement models and the fundamental shift toward value-based care are primary drivers for the adoption of these advanced financial visibility tools across healthcare organizations.Rising patient financial responsibility also necessitates integrated features such as payment estimation tools and flexible payment portals. The criticality of resilient RCM systems was recently highlighted by a major cybersecurity incident that disrupted operations for thousands of providers. This event has accelerated investments in secure, cloud-based solutions with embedded AI for p

The HCUP Summary Trend Tables include monthly information on hospital utilization derived from the HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID) and HCUP State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD). Information on emergency department (ED) utilization is dependent on availability of HCUP data; not all HCUP Partners participate in the SEDD. The HCUP Summary Trend Tables include downloadable Microsoft® Excel tables with information on the following topics: Overview of monthly trends in inpatient and emergency department utilization All inpatient encounter types Inpatient stays by priority conditions -COVID-19 -Influenza -Other acute or viral respiratory infection Inpatient encounter type -Normal newborns -Deliveries -Non-elective inpatient stays, admitted through the ED -Non-elective inpatient stays, not admitted through the ED -Elective inpatient stays Inpatient service line -Maternal and neonatal conditions -Mental health and substance use disorders -Injuries -Surgeries -Other medical conditions Emergency department treat-and-release visits Emergency department treat-and-release visits by priority conditions -COVID-19 -Influenza -Other acute or viral respiratory infection Description of the data source, methodology, and clinical criteria

According to a 2023 survey carried out In Latin America, doctors remain the main source of healthcare and prevention information, with this category being the main choice for ** percent of respondents. Social media and health mobile applications ranked second, each being the source of choice for ** percent of respondents.

Introduction:

This dataset contains comprehensive information on various demographic, healthcare, and location-related attributes of individuals. The data was collected through a comprehensive survey conducted across diverse geographical locations.

Column Descriptions:

1. Location, _Location_latitude, _Location_longitude, _Location_altitude, _Location_precision: These columns provide the precise geographical coordinates and altitude of the respondents, enabling accurate spatial analysis.

2. Date and Time: This column records the date and time of the survey, providing temporal context for the dataset.

3. Age, Gender, Marital Status, How many children do you have, if any?: These columns capture essential demographic information, including age, gender, marital status, and the number of children, offering insights into the composition of the surveyed population.

4.Employment Status, Monthly Household Income: These attributes provide insights into the financial stability of the respondents, including their employment status and monthly household income. 5. Healthcare-Related Information: a) Have you ever had health insurance? If yes, which insurance cover?: This column identifies respondents with previous health insurance coverage and specifies the type of insurance they had. b) When was the last time you visited a hospital for medical treatment? (In Months): This records the duration, in months, since the respondents' last hospital visit. c) Did you have health insurance during your last hospital visit?: This column indicates whether the respondents had health insurance during their last hospital visit. d) Have you ever had a routine check-up with a doctor or healthcare provider?: This column identifies if respondents have undergone routine health check-ups. e) If you answered yes to the previous question, what time period (in years) do you stay before having your routine check-up?: This captures the time gap, in years, between routine check-ups for respondents. f) Have you ever had a cancer screening (e.g., mammogram, colonoscopy, etc.)?: This column identifies respondents who have undergone cancer screening. g) If you answered yes to the previous question, what time period (in years) do you stay before having your Cancer screening?: This records the time gap, in years, between cancer screenings for respondents.

1. Miscellaneous Information:

a) Your Picture, Your Picture_URL: These columns contain the images and corresponding URLs of the respondents. b) _id, _uuid, _submission_time, _validation_status, _notes, _status, _submitted_by, version, _tags, _index: These are internal identifiers and metadata attributes associated with the dataset.

Use Case:

This dataset can be utilized for various analyses, including demographic profiling, healthcare utilization patterns, and spatial health disparities assessment, thereby facilitating informed policy-making and targeted healthcare interventions.

This statistic shows the result of a survey question asking respondents to what extent they trusted different health organizations to keep their digital healthcare data secure in England as of 2017. Of respondents, ** percent had at least a moderate amount of trust in their physicians and other healthcare providers. The least amount of trust overall was placed in tech companies.

In 2021, ** percent of respondents to a survey conducted worldwide said they trusted healthcare providers very much to keep their digital healthcare information secure. Additionally, only *** percent of respondents trusted technology companies fully to keep their health data secure, it was the least trusted organization globally in 2021.