Between January and September 2024, healthcare organizations in the United States saw 491 large-scale data breaches, resulting in the loss of over 500 records. This figure has increased significantly in the last decade. To date, the highest number of large-scale data breaches in the U.S. healthcare sector was recorded in 2023, with a reported 745 cases.

Context

Health care in the United States is provided by many distinct organizations. Health care facilities are largely owned and operated by private sector businesses. 58% of US community hospitals are non-profit, 21% are government owned, and 21% are for-profit. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States spent more on healthcare per capita ($9,403), and more on health care as percentage of its GDP (17.1%), than any other nation in 2014. Many different datasets are needed to portray different aspects of healthcare in US like disease prevalences, pharmaceuticals and drugs, Nutritional data of different food products available in US. Such data is collected by surveys (or otherwise) conducted by Centre of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Foods and Drugs Administration, Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). These datasets can be used to properly review demographics and diseases, determining start ratings of healthcare providers, different drugs and their compositions as well as package informations for different diseases and for food quality. We often want such information and finding and scraping such data can be a huge hurdle. So, Here an attempt is made to make available all US healthcare data at one place to download from in csv files.

Content

• Nhanes Survey (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) - The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) is a program of studies designed to assess the health and nutritional status of adults and children in the United States. The survey is unique in that it combines interviews and physical examinations. NHANES is a major program of the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). NCHS is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and has the responsibility for producing vital and health statistics for the Nation. The NHANES interview includes demographic, socioeconomic, dietary, and health-related questions. The examination component consists of medical, dental, and physiological measurements, as well as laboratory tests administered by highly trained medical personnel. The diseases, medical conditions, and health indicators to be studied include: Anemia, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Environmental exposures, Eye diseases, Hearing loss, Infectious diseases, Kidney disease, Nutrition, Obesity, Oral health, Osteoporosis, Physical fitness and physical functioning, Reproductive history and sexual behavior, Respiratory disease (asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema), Sexually transmitted diseases, Vision. 10000 individuals are surveyed to represent US statistics. Five files in this datasets represent current recent Nhanes data -
  Nhanes_2005_2006.csv
  Nhanes_2007_2008.csv
  Nhanes_2009_2010.csv
  Nhanes_2011_2012.csv
  Nhanes_2013_2014.csv
  
  • Data fields' description -
    • Nhanes_2005_2006.csv - Demographic, Dietary, Examinations, Laboratory
    • Nhanes_2007_2008.csv - Demographic, Dietary, Examinations, Laboratory
    • Nhanes_2009_2010.csv - Demographic, Dietary, Examinations, Laboratory
    • Nhanes_2011_2012.csv - Demographic, Dietary, [Examinations](http://https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/search/variab...

As of February 2022, 71 percent of healthcare leaders surveyed globally said they have confidence in the actionable insights their hospital/healthcare facility is able to extract from available data. Overall, healthcare leaders had high confidence in the data utilization process of their organization and the value that data can bring to their work.

This table provides an overview of the key figures on health and care available on StatLine. All figures are taken from other tables on StatLine, either directly or through a simple conversion. In the original tables, breakdowns by characteristics of individuals or other variables are possible. The period after the year of review before data become available differs between the data series. The number of exam passes/graduates in year t is the number of persons who obtained a diploma in school/study year starting in t-1 and ending in t.

Data available from: 2001

Status of the figures:

2024: Most available figures are definite. Figures are provisional for: - causes of death; - youth care; - persons employed in health and welfare; - persons employed in healthcare; - Mbo health care graduates; - Hbo nursing graduates / medicine graduates (university).

2023: Most available figures are definite. Figures are provisional for: - perinatal mortality at pregnancy duration at least 24 weeks; - diagnoses known to the general practitioner; - hospital admissions by some diagnoses; - average period of hospitalisation; - supplied drugs; - AWBZ/Wlz-funded long term care; - physicians and nurses employed in care; - persons employed in health and welfare; - average distance to facilities; - profitability and operating results at institutions. Figures are revised provisional for: - expenditures on health and welfare.

2022: Most available figures are definite. Figures are revised provisional for: - expenditures on health and welfare.

2021: Most available figures are definite, Figures are revised provisional for: - expenditures on health and welfare.f

2020 and earlier: All available figures are definite.

Changes as of 4 July 2025: More recent figures have been added for: - causes of death; - life expectancy; - life expectancy in perceived good health; - self-perceived health; - hospital admissions by some diagnoses; - sickness absence; - average period of hospitalisation; - contacts with health professionals; - youth care; - smoking, heavy drinkers, physical activity; - overweight; - high blood pressure; - physicians and nurses employed in care; - persons employed in health and welfare; - persons employed in healthcare; - Mbo health care graduates; - Hbo nursing graduates / medicine graduates (university); - expenditures on health and welfare; - profitability and operating results at institutions.

Changes as of 18 december 2024: - Distance to facilities: the figures withdrawn on 5 June have been replaced (unchanged). - Youth care: the previously published final results for 2021 and 2022 have been adjusted due to improvements in the processing. - Due to a revision of the statistics Expenditure on health and welfare 2021, figures for expenditure on health and welfare care have been replaced from 2021 onwards. - Due to the revision of the National Accounts, the figures on persons employed in health and welfare have been replaced for all years. - AWBZ/Wlz-funded long term care: from 2015, the series Wlz residential care including total package at home has been replaced by total Wlz care. This series fits better with the chosen demarcation of indications for Wlz care.

When will new figures be published? New figures will be published in December 2025.

A 2024 survey found that over half of U.S. individuals indicated the cost of accessing treatment was the biggest problem facing the national healthcare system. This is much higher than the global average of 32 percent and is in line with the high cost of health care in the U.S. compared to other high-income countries. Bureaucracy along with a lack of staff were also considered to be pressing issues. This statistic reveals the share of individuals who said select problems were the biggest facing the health care system in the United States in 2024.

Comprehensive Medical Q&A Dataset

Unlocking Healthcare Data with Natural Language Processing

By Huggingface Hub [source]

About this dataset

The MedQuad dataset provides a comprehensive source of medical questions and answers for natural language processing. With over 43,000 patient inquiries from real-life situations categorized into 31 distinct types of questions, the dataset offers an invaluable opportunity to research correlations between treatments, chronic diseases, medical protocols and more. Answers provided in this database come not only from doctors but also other healthcare professionals such as nurses and pharmacists, providing a more complete array of responses to help researchers unlock deeper insights within the realm of healthcare. This incredible trove of knowledge is just waiting to be mined - so grab your data mining equipment and get exploring!

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

In order to make the most out of this dataset, start by having a look at the column names and understanding what information they offer: qtype (the type of medical question), Question (the question in itself), and Answer (the expert response). The qtype column will help you categorize the dataset according to your desired question topics. Once you have filtered down your criteria as much as possible using qtype, it is time to analyze the data. Start by asking yourself questions such as “What treatments do most patients search for?” or “Are there any correlations between chronic conditions and protocols?” Then use simple queries such as SELECT Answer FROM MedQuad WHERE qtype='Treatment' AND Question LIKE '%pain%' to get closer to answering those questions.

Once you have obtained new insights about healthcare based on the answers provided in this dynmaic data set - now it’s time for action! Use all that newfound understanding about patient needs in order develop educational materials and implement any suggested changes necessary. If more criteria are needed for querying this data set see if MedQuad offers additional columns; sometimes extra columns may be added periodically that could further enhance analysis capabilities; look out for notifications if these happen.

Finally once making an impact with the use case(s) - don't forget proper citation etiquette; give credit where credit is due!

Research Ideas

• Developing medical diagnostic tools that use natural language processing (NLP) to better identify and diagnose health conditions in patients.
• Creating predictive models to anticipate treatment options for different medical conditions using machine learning techniques.
• Leveraging the dataset to build chatbots and virtual assistants that are able to answer a broad range of questions about healthcare with expert-level accuracy

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

License

License: CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) - Public Domain Dedication No Copyright - You can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. See Other Information.

Columns

File: train.csv | Column name | Description | |:--------------|:------------------------------------------------------| | qtype | The type of medical question. (String) | | Question | The medical question posed by the patient. (String) | | Answer | The expert response to the medical question. (String) |

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. If you use this dataset in your research, please credit Huggingface Hub.

The global healthcare data and analytics services market is experiencing robust growth, driven by the increasing volume of healthcare data generated from electronic health records (EHRs), wearable devices, and other sources. The market's expansion is fueled by the rising need for improved patient care, operational efficiency, and evidence-based decision-making within healthcare organizations. Key trends include the adoption of cloud-based analytics platforms, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications for predictive analytics and personalized medicine, and a growing focus on data security and privacy regulations like HIPAA. Major players like Accenture, Optum, and IBM are investing heavily in developing advanced analytics solutions and expanding their service offerings to cater to this growing demand. While the market faces challenges such as data integration complexities and the need for skilled professionals in data science and analytics, the long-term outlook remains positive. We project a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 15% for the forecast period, reflecting the continuous advancements in technology and the increasing adoption of data-driven strategies in the healthcare sector. This growth will be further spurred by government initiatives promoting digital health and value-based care models, which heavily rely on robust data analysis capabilities. The competitive landscape is characterized by a mix of large multinational corporations and specialized analytics firms. The top players are continuously investing in acquisitions, partnerships, and research & development to maintain their market share and offer innovative solutions. The market is segmented based on service type (predictive analytics, descriptive analytics, diagnostic analytics), deployment mode (cloud, on-premise), and end-user (hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, payers). Regional variations in market growth are expected, with North America and Europe maintaining dominant positions due to advanced healthcare infrastructure and higher adoption rates of data analytics technologies. However, growth in Asia-Pacific is anticipated to accelerate, driven by increasing investments in healthcare infrastructure and digitalization efforts in developing economies. The overall market size is projected to reach significant figures by 2033, presenting lucrative opportunities for established players and emerging businesses alike.

The HCUP Summary Trend Tables include monthly information on hospital utilization derived from the HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID) and HCUP State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD). Information on emergency department (ED) utilization is dependent on availability of HCUP data; not all HCUP Partners participate in the SEDD. The HCUP Summary Trend Tables include downloadable Microsoft® Excel tables with information on the following topics: Overview of monthly trends in inpatient and emergency department utilization All inpatient encounter types Inpatient stays by priority conditions -COVID-19 -Influenza -Other acute or viral respiratory infection Inpatient encounter type -Normal newborns -Deliveries -Non-elective inpatient stays, admitted through the ED -Non-elective inpatient stays, not admitted through the ED -Elective inpatient stays Inpatient service line -Maternal and neonatal conditions -Mental health and substance use disorders -Injuries -Surgeries -Other medical conditions Emergency department treat-and-release visits Emergency department treat-and-release visits by priority conditions -COVID-19 -Influenza -Other acute or viral respiratory infection Description of the data source, methodology, and clinical criteria

The Healthcare Data Monetization Market Report is Segmented by Type (Direct and Indirect), Deployment (On-Premises, Cloud), Application (Population Health Management, Drug Discovery & Development, and More), End User (Pharmaceutical & Biotechnology Companies, and More), Pricing Model (Subscription/Licensing, and More)), and Geography (North America, Europe, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

In the U.S., every hospital that receives payments from Medicare and Medicaid is mandated to provide quality data to The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) annually. This data helps gauge patient satisfaction levels across the country. While overall hospital scores can be influenced by the quality of customer services, there may also be variations in satisfaction based on the type of hospital or its location.

Year: 2016 - 2020

The Star Rating Program, implemented by The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), employs a five-star grading system to evaluate the experiences of Medicare beneficiaries with their respective health plans and the overall healthcare system. Health plans receive scores ranging from 1 to 5 stars, with 5 stars denoting the highest quality.

Benefits:

Historical Analysis: With data spanning from 2016 to 2020, researchers and analysts can observe trends over time, understanding how patient satisfaction has evolved over these years.

Benchmarking: Hospitals can compare their performance against national averages or against peer institutions to see where they stand.

Identifying Areas for Improvement: By analyzing specific metrics and feedback, hospitals can pinpoint areas where their services may be lacking and need enhancement.

Policy and Decision Making: Governments and healthcare administrators can use the data to make informed decisions about healthcare policies, funding allocations, and other strategic decisions.

Research and Academic Purposes: Academics and researchers can use the dataset for various studies, including correlational studies, predictions, and more.

Geographical Insights: The dataset may provide insights into regional variations in patient satisfaction, helping to identify areas or states with particularly high or low scores.

Understanding Factors Affecting Satisfaction: By correlating satisfaction scores with other variables (e.g., hospital type, size, location), it might be possible to determine which factors play the most significant role in patient satisfaction.

Performance Evaluation: Hospitals can use the data to evaluate the efficacy of any interventions or changes they've made over the years in terms of improving patient satisfaction.

Enhancing Patient Trust: Demonstrating transparency and a commitment to improvement can enhance patient trust and loyalty.

Informed Patients: By making such data publicly available, potential patients can make more informed decisions about where to seek care based on the satisfaction ratings of previous patients.

Source: https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/archived-data/hospitals

This dataset contains data for the Healthcare Payments Data (HPD): Medical Out-of-Pocket Costs and Chronic Conditions report. The data covers three measurement categories: annual member count, annual median out-of-pocket count, annual median claim count. The annual member count quantify the number of unique individuals who received at least one medical service in the reporting year. Annual median out-of-pocket measurements quantifies the sum of copay, coinsurance, and deductible incurred by members. Annual median claim count measurements quantifies the number of distinct claims or encounters associated with members. Both 25th and 75th percentiles for out-of-pocket cost and claim count are also included. Measures are grouped by payer types, chronic conditions flag, chronic condition types, and chronic condition numbers.

Medline is a leading medical information and technology company that provides a vast array of healthcare solutions to professionals and consumers alike. Founded in 1959, Medline has established itself as a trusted and authoritative source of medical knowledge, with a presence in over 90 countries worldwide.

From pharmaceuticals and medical devices to healthcare technology and medical billing, Medline's extensive portfolio encompasses a wide range of products and services that cater to the needs of the medical community.

This dataset contains data for the Healthcare Payments Data (HPD) Snapshot visualization. The Enrollment data file contains counts of claims and encounter data collected for California's statewide HPD Program. It includes counts of enrollment records, service records from medical and pharmacy claims, and the number of individuals represented across these records. Aggregate counts are grouped by payer type (Commercial, Medi-Cal, or Medicare), product type, and year. The Medical data file contains counts of medical procedures from medical claims and encounter data in HPD. Procedures are categorized using claim line procedure codes and grouped by year, type of setting (e.g., outpatient, laboratory, ambulance), and payer type. The Pharmacy data file contains counts of drug prescriptions from pharmacy claims and encounter data in HPD. Prescriptions are categorized by name and drug class using the reported National Drug Code (NDC) and grouped by year, payer type, and whether the drug dispensed is branded or a generic.

The Big Data Healthcare Market Report is Segmented by Component (Software, Services), Deployment (On-Premise, Cloud), Analytics Type (Descriptive Analytics, Predictive Analytics, Prescriptive Analytics), Application (Financial Analytics, and More), End User (Healthcare Providers, and More), and Geography (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and More). The Market Forecasts are Provided in Terms of Value (USD).

The big data in healthcare market size is estimated to grow from USD 78 billion in 2024 to USD 540 billion by 2035, representing a CAGR of 19.20% till 2035

This is the current Medical Service Study Area. California Medical Service Study Areas are created by the California Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI).Check the Data Dictionary for field descriptions.Search for the Medical Service Study Area data on the CHHS Open Data Portal.Checkout the California Healthcare Atlas for more Medical Service Study Area information.This is an update to the MSSA geometries and demographics to reflect the new 2020 Census tract data. The Medical Service Study Area (MSSA) polygon layer represents the best fit mapping of all new 2020 California census tract boundaries to the original 2010 census tract boundaries used in the construction of the original 2010 MSSA file. Each of the state's new 9,129 census tracts was assigned to one of the previously established medical service study areas (excluding tracts with no land area), as identified in this data layer. The MSSA Census tract data is aggregated by HCAI, to create this MSSA data layer. This represents the final re-mapping of 2020 Census tracts to the original 2010 MSSA geometries. The 2010 MSSA were based on U.S. Census 2010 data and public meetings held throughout California.Source of update: American Community Survey 5-year 2006-2010 data for poverty. For source tables refer to InfoUSA update procedural documentation. The 2010 MSSA Detail layer was developed to update fields affected by population change. The American Community Survey 5-year 2006-2010 population data pertaining to total, in households, race, ethnicity, age, and poverty was used in the update. The 2010 MSSA Census Tract Detail map layer was developed to support geographic information systems (GIS) applications, representing 2010 census tract geography that is the foundation of 2010 medical service study area (MSSA) boundaries. ***This version is the finalized MSSA reconfiguration boundaries based on the US Census Bureau 2010 Census. In 1976 Garamendi Rural Health Services Act, required the development of a geographic framework for determining which parts of the state were rural and which were urban, and for determining which parts of counties and cities had adequate health care resources and which were "medically underserved". Thus, sub-city and sub-county geographic units called "medical service study areas [MSSAs]" were developed, using combinations of census-defined geographic units, established following General Rules promulgated by a statutory commission. After each subsequent census the MSSAs were revised. In the scheduled revisions that followed the 1990 census, community meetings of stakeholders (including county officials, and representatives of hospitals and community health centers) were held in larger metropolitan areas. The meetings were designed to develop consensus as how to draw the sub-city units so as to best display health care disparities. The importance of involving stakeholders was heightened in 1992 when the United States Department of Health and Human Services' Health and Resources Administration entered a formal agreement to recognize the state-determined MSSAs as "rational service areas" for federal recognition of "health professional shortage areas" and "medically underserved areas". After the 2000 census, two innovations transformed the process, and set the stage for GIS to emerge as a major factor in health care resource planning in California. First, the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development [OSHPD], which organizes the community stakeholder meetings and provides the staff to administer the MSSAs, entered into an Enterprise GIS contract. Second, OSHPD authorized at least one community meeting to be held in each of the 58 counties, a significant number of which were wholly rural or frontier counties. For populous Los Angeles County, 11 community meetings were held. As a result, health resource data in California are collected and organized by 541 geographic units. The boundaries of these units were established by community healthcare experts, with the objective of maximizing their usefulness for needs assessment purposes. The most dramatic consequence was introducing a data simultaneously displayed in a GIS format. A two-person team, incorporating healthcare policy and GIS expertise, conducted the series of meetings, and supervised the development of the 2000-census configuration of the MSSAs.MSSA Configuration Guidelines (General Rules):- Each MSSA is composed of one or more complete census tracts.- As a general rule, MSSAs are deemed to be "rational service areas [RSAs]" for purposes of designating health professional shortage areas [HPSAs], medically underserved areas [MUAs] or medically underserved populations [MUPs].- MSSAs will not cross county lines.- To the extent practicable, all census-defined places within the MSSA are within 30 minutes travel time to the largest population center within the MSSA, except in those circumstances where meeting this criterion would require splitting a census tract.- To the extent practicable, areas that, standing alone, would meet both the definition of an MSSA and a Rural MSSA, should not be a part of an Urban MSSA.- Any Urban MSSA whose population exceeds 200,000 shall be divided into two or more Urban MSSA Subdivisions.- Urban MSSA Subdivisions should be within a population range of 75,000 to 125,000, but may not be smaller than five square miles in area. If removing any census tract on the perimeter of the Urban MSSA Subdivision would cause the area to fall below five square miles in area, then the population of the Urban MSSA may exceed 125,000. - To the extent practicable, Urban MSSA Subdivisions should reflect recognized community and neighborhood boundaries and take into account such demographic information as income level and ethnicity. Rural Definitions: A rural MSSA is an MSSA adopted by the Commission, which has a population density of less than 250 persons per square mile, and which has no census defined place within the area with a population in excess of 50,000. Only the population that is located within the MSSA is counted in determining the population of the census defined place. A frontier MSSA is a rural MSSA adopted by the Commission which has a population density of less than 11 persons per square mile. Any MSSA which is not a rural or frontier MSSA is an urban MSSA. Last updated December 6th 2024.

Graph and download economic data for Hours Worked for Health Care and Social Assistance: Offices of Physicians (NAICS 6211) in the United States (IPURN6211L201000000) from 1988 to 2024 about offices, physicians, healthcare, social assistance, health, NAICS, hours, IP, and USA.

Limit state-purchased health care cost growth to 2% less than the projected national health expenditures average every year through 2019.

The US Healthcare Visits Statistics dataset includes data about the frequency of healthcare visits to doctor offices, emergency departments, and home visits within the past 12 months in the United States by age, race, Hispanic origin, poverty level, health insurance status, geographic region and other characteristics between 1997 and 2016.

Technical notes and documentation on the common data model of the project CONCEPT-DM2.

This publication corresponds to the Common Data Model (CDM) specification of the CONCEPT-DM2 project for the implementation of a federated network analysis of the healthcare pathway of type 2 diabetes.

Aims of the CONCEPT-DM2 project:

General aim: To analyse chronic care effectiveness and efficiency of care pathways in diabetes, assuming the relevance of care pathways as independent factors of health outcomes using data from real life world (RWD) from five Spanish Regional Health Systems.

Main specific aims:

• To characterize the care pathways in patients with diabetes through the whole care system in terms of process indicators and pharmacologic recommendations
• To compare these observed care pathways with the theoretical clinical pathways derived from the clinical practice guidelines
• To assess if the adherence to clinical guidelines influence on important health outcomes, such as cardiovascular hospitalizations.
• To compare the traditional analytical methods with process mining methods in terms of modeling quality, prediction performance and information provided.

Study Design: It is a population-based retrospective observational study centered on all T2D patients diagnosed in five Regional Health Services within the Spanish National Health Service. We will include all the contacts of these patients with the health services using the electronic medical record systems including Primary Care data, Specialized Care data, Hospitalizations, Urgent Care data, Pharmacy Claims, and also other registers such as the mortality and the population register.

Cohort definition: All patients with code of Type 2 Diabetes in the clinical health records

• Inclusion criteria: patients that, at 01/01/2017 or during the follow-up from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2022 had active health card (active TIS - tarjeta sanitaria activa) and code of type 2 diabetes (T2D, DM2 in spanish) in the clinical records of primary care (CIAP2 T90 in case of using CIAP code system)
• Exclusion criteria:
  • patients with no contact with the health system from 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2022
  • patients that had a T1D (DM1) code opened after the T2D code during the follow-up.
• Study period. From 01/01/2017 to 31/12/2022

Files included in this publication:

• Datamodel_CONCEPT_DM2_diagram.png
• Common data model specification (Datamodel_CONCEPT_DM2_v.0.1.0.xlsx)
• Synthetic datasets (Datamodel_CONCEPT_DM2_sample_data)
  • sample_data1_dm_patient.csv
  • sample_data2_dm_param.csv
  • sample_data3_dm_patient.csv
  • sample_data4_dm_param.csv
  • sample_data5_dm_patient.csv
  • sample_data6_dm_param.csv
  • sample_data7_dm_param.csv
  • sample_data8_dm_param.csv
• Datamodel_CONCEPT_DM2_explanation.pptx