The states with the highest rates of HIV diagnoses in 2022 included Georgia, Louisiana, and Florida. However, the states with the highest number of people with HIV were Texas, California, and Florida. In Texas, there were around 4,896 people diagnosed with HIV. HIV/AIDS diagnoses In 2022, there were an estimated 38,043 new HIV diagnoses in the United States, a slight increase compared to the year before. Men account for the majority of these new diagnoses. There are currently around 1.2 million people living with HIV in the United States. Deaths from HIV The death rate from HIV has decreased significantly over the past few decades. In 2023, there were only 1.3 deaths from HIV per 100,000 population, the lowest rate since the epidemic began. However, the death rate varies greatly depending on race or ethnicity, with the death rate from HIV for African Americans reaching 19.2 per 100,000 population in 2022, compared to just three deaths per 100,000 among the white population.

In 2022, the District of Columbia had the highest HIV disease death rate among all U.S. states where 6.2 out of 100,000 inhabitants died due to HIV in 2022. This statistic shows the U.S. states with the highest HIV disease death rates in 2022.

In 2022, the states with the highest number of HIV diagnoses were Texas, California, and Florida. That year, there were a total of around 37,601 HIV diagnoses in the United States. Of these, 4,896 were diagnosed in Texas. HIV infections have been decreasing globally for many years. In the year 2000, there were 2.8 million new infections worldwide, but this number had decreased to around 1.3 million new infections by 2023. The number of people living with HIV remains fairly steady, but the number of those that have died due to AIDS has reached some of its lowest peaks in a decade. Currently, there is no functional cure for HIV or AIDS, but improvements in therapies and treatments have enabled those living with HIV to have a much improved quality of life.

United States US: Prevalence of HIV: Total: % of Population Aged 15-49 data was reported at 0.500 % in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.500 % for 2013. United States US: Prevalence of HIV: Total: % of Population Aged 15-49 data is updated yearly, averaging 0.500 % from Dec 2008 (Median) to 2014, with 7 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.500 % in 2014 and a record low of 0.500 % in 2014. United States US: Prevalence of HIV: Total: % of Population Aged 15-49 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Prevalence of HIV refers to the percentage of people ages 15-49 who are infected with HIV.; ; UNAIDS estimates.; Weighted Average;

In 2020, the prevalence of HIV among individuals aged 15 to 49 years was nearly *** percent in Haiti, the highest among selected Latin American countries. Meanwhile, Nicaragua and Bolivia reported a prevalence rate of the virus of *** percent that year. In 2019, Brazil was home to the most people living with HIV in the region.

In 2023, Black or African Americans had the highest rates of HIV diagnoses among males in the United States. In that year, among all men, 19 per 100,000 were diagnosed with HIV. This statistic displays the rate of HIV diagnoses among males in the U.S. in 2023, by race and ethnicity (per 100,000 population).

United States US: Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population Aged 15-49 data was reported at 0.220 Ratio in 2018. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.220 Ratio for 2017. United States US: Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population Aged 15-49 data is updated yearly, averaging 0.250 Ratio from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2018, with 29 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.290 Ratio in 1990 and a record low of 0.220 Ratio in 2018. United States US: Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population Aged 15-49 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.World Bank.WDI: Health Statistics. Number of new HIV infections among uninfected populations ages 15-49 expressed per 1,000 uninfected population in the year before the period.; ; UNAIDS estimates.; Weighted average;

Among all countries worldwide those in sub-Saharan Africa have the highest rates of HIV. The countries with the highest rates of HIV include Eswatini, South Africa, and Lesotho. In 2024, Eswatini had the highest prevalence of HIV with a rate of around ** percent. Other countries, such as Zimbabwe, have significantly decreased their HIV prevalence. Community-based HIV services are considered crucial to the prevention and treatment of HIV. HIV Worldwide The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a viral infection that is transmitted via exposure to infected semen, blood, vaginal and anal fluids, and breast milk. HIV destroys the human immune system, rendering the host unable to fight off secondary infections. Globally, the number of people living with HIV has generally increased over the past two decades. However, the number of HIV-related deaths has decreased significantly in recent years. Despite being a serious illness that affects millions of people, medication exists that effectively manages the progression of the virus in the body. These medications are called antiretroviral drugs. HIV Treatment Generally, global access to antiretroviral treatment has increased. However, despite being available worldwide, not all adults have access to antiretroviral drugs. There are many different antiretroviral drugs available on the market. As of 2024, ********, an antiretroviral marketed by Gilead, was the leading HIV treatment based on revenue.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global HIV Diagnostics market size is USD 4158.2 million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.90% from 2024 to 2031. North America held the major market share for more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1663.28 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.1% from 2024 to 2031. Europe accounted for a market share of over 30% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 1247.46 million. Asia Pacific held a market share of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 956.39 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.9% from 2024 to 2031. Latin America had a market share of more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 207.91 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.3% from 2024 to 2031. Middle East and Africa had a market share of around 2% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 83.16 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 10.6% from 2024 to 2031. Consumables held the highest HIV Diagnostics market revenue share in 2024. Market Dynamics of HIV Diagnostics Market Key Drivers for HIV Diagnostics Market Increasing Prevalence of Sexually Transmitted Disease to Increase the Demand Globally Throughout the many decades of the HIV pandemic, the number of infected individuals is continually rising. The socioeconomic variables driving this continuous increase also suggest that preventative measures have not been successful. Even though many of these infections are preventable, there are an estimated 20 million new cases of STDs in the US each year, and the rate is still rising. Moreover, there are over 1.2 million HIV-positive individuals residing in the United States. Attempts to encourage testing and screening for sexually transmitted infections can ascertain an individual's likelihood of acquiring one and help those who already have one receive treatment, so enhancing their health and lowering the danger of HIV spreading to others. Approximately 38.4 million people worldwide were HIV positive in 2021. Among these, women and girls made up nearly 54%. Rising Initiatives by Global Agencies to Propel Market Growth HIV is among the world's most important public health concerns. As a result, there is a global commitment to stopping new HIV infections and giving everyone on the planet access to HIV therapy. WHO recommends testing for HIV to anyone who might be at risk. The World Bank was a leader in global financing for HIV/AIDS in the early phases of the pandemic and has contributed US$4.6 billion to programs related to the illness since 1989. Because of assistance from the Bank—more precisely, through the International Development Association—for 1,500 counseling and testing centers, about 7 million people have had HIV tests. Restraint Factor for the HIV Diagnostics Market Lack of Healthcare Infrastructure and Awareness to Limit the Sales A proper infrastructure for healthcare delivery is lacking in many areas, especially in poor nations, which makes it difficult to provide diagnostic services. This covers concerns with the supply chain, inadequate laboratory facilities, and skilled staff. It might be particularly difficult to access diagnostic services in rural and isolated places due to a lack of healthcare facilities and inadequate transportation infrastructure. Furthermore, HIV diagnosis rates are lower in the developing Asia-Pacific, Middle East, and African regions. These areas require a sufficient number of diagnostic facilities. Additionally, the diagnosis process needs to be explained to the majority of patients, which restricts market growth in these areas. Impact of Covid-19 on the HIV Diagnostics Market The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the HIV diagnostics market, both in terms of challenges and opportunities. There was a decrease in HIV testing and diagnostic services during the pandemic as a result of the extensive healthcare resources being redirected to handle COVID-19. Some facilities were converted to provide COVID-19 treatment, and clinics and labs had a staffing crisis. Reduced HIV testing rates were the outcome of routine and community-based HIV testing programs being frequently halted to stop the spread of COVID-19. The adoption of telemedicine and remote healthcare services was expedited by the epidem...

Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population ages 15-49) in United States was reported at 0.4 % in 2021, according to the World Bank collection of development indicators, compiled from officially recognized sources. United States - Prevalence of HIV, total (% of population ages 15-49) - actual values, historical data, forecasts and projections were sourced from the World Bank on September of 2025.

BackgroundThe risks of HIV transmission associated with the opioid epidemic make cost-effective programs for people who inject drugs (PWID) a public health priority. Some of these programs have benefits beyond prevention of HIV—a critical consideration given that injection drug use is increasing across most United States demographic groups. To identify high-value HIV prevention program portfolios for US PWID, we consider combinations of four interventions with demonstrated efficacy: opioid agonist therapy (OAT), needle and syringe programs (NSPs), HIV testing and treatment (Test & Treat), and oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).Methods and findingsWe adapted an empirically calibrated dynamic compartmental model and used it to assess the discounted costs (in 2015 US dollars), health outcomes (HIV infections averted, change in HIV prevalence, and discounted quality-adjusted life years [QALYs]), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of the four prevention programs, considered singly and in combination over a 20-y time horizon. We obtained epidemiologic, economic, and health utility parameter estimates from the literature, previously published models, and expert opinion. We estimate that expansions of OAT, NSPs, and Test & Treat implemented singly up to 50% coverage levels can be cost-effective relative to the next highest coverage level (low, medium, and high at 40%, 45%, and 50%, respectively) and that OAT, which we assume to have immediate and direct health benefits for the individual, has the potential to be the highest value investment, even under scenarios where it prevents fewer infections than other programs. Although a model-based analysis can provide only estimates of health outcomes, we project that, over 20 y, 50% coverage with OAT could avert up to 22,000 (95% CI: 5,200, 46,000) infections and cost US$18,000 (95% CI: US$14,000, US$24,000) per QALY gained, 50% NSP coverage could avert up to 35,000 (95% CI: 8,900, 43,000) infections and cost US$25,000 (95% CI: US$7,000, US$76,000) per QALY gained, 50% Test & Treat coverage could avert up to 6,700 (95% CI: 1,200, 16,000) infections and cost US$27,000 (95% CI: US$15,000, US$48,000) per QALY gained, and 50% PrEP coverage could avert up to 37,000 (22,000, 58,000) infections and cost US$300,000 (95% CI: US$162,000, US$667,000) per QALY gained. When coverage expansions are allowed to include combined investment with other programs and are compared to the next best intervention, the model projects that scaling OAT coverage up to 50%, then scaling NSP coverage to 50%, then scaling Test & Treat coverage to 50% can be cost-effective, with each coverage expansion having the potential to cost less than US$50,000 per QALY gained relative to the next best portfolio. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, 59% of portfolios prioritized the addition of OAT and 41% prioritized the addition of NSPs, while PrEP was not likely to be a priority nor a cost-effective addition. Our findings are intended to be illustrative, as data on achievable coverage are limited and, in practice, the expansion scenarios considered may exceed feasible levels. We assumed independence of interventions and constant returns to scale. Extensive sensitivity analyses allowed us to assess parameter sensitivity, but the use of a dynamic compartmental model limited the exploration of structural sensitivities.ConclusionsWe estimate that OAT, NSPs, and Test & Treat, implemented singly or in combination, have the potential to effectively and cost-effectively prevent HIV in US PWID. PrEP is not likely to be cost-effective in this population, based on the scenarios we evaluated. While local budgets or policy may constrain feasible coverage levels for the various interventions, our findings suggest that investments in combined prevention programs can substantially reduce HIV transmission and improve health outcomes among PWID.

BackgroundIn the generalised epidemics of sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevalence shows patterns of clustered micro-epidemics. We mapped and characterised these high-prevalence areas for young adults (15–29 years of age), as a proxy for areas with high levels of transmission, for 7 countries in Eastern and Southern Africa: Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.Methods and findingsWe used geolocated survey data from the most recent United States Agency for International Development (USAID) demographic and health surveys (DHSs) and AIDS indicator surveys (AISs) (collected between 2008–2009 and 2015–2016), which included about 113,000 adults—of which there were about 53,000 young adults (27,000 women, 28,000 men)—from over 3,500 sample locations. First, ordinary kriging was applied to predict HIV prevalence at unmeasured locations. Second, we explored to what extent behavioural, socioeconomic, and environmental factors explain HIV prevalence at the individual- and sample-location level, by developing a series of multilevel multivariable logistic regression models and geospatially visualising unexplained model heterogeneity. National-level HIV prevalence for young adults ranged from 2.2% in Tanzania to 7.7% in Mozambique. However, at the subnational level, we found areas with prevalence among young adults as high as 11% or 15% alternating with areas with prevalence between 0% and 2%, suggesting the existence of areas with high levels of transmission Overall, 15.6% of heterogeneity could be explained by an interplay of known behavioural, socioeconomic, and environmental factors. Maps of the interpolated random effect estimates show that environmental variables, representing indicators of economic activity, were most powerful in explaining high-prevalence areas. Main study limitations were the inability to infer causality due to the cross-sectional nature of the surveys and the likely under-sampling of key populations in the surveys.ConclusionsWe found that, among young adults, micro-epidemics of relatively high HIV prevalence alternate with areas of very low prevalence, clearly illustrating the existence of areas with high levels of transmission. These areas are partially characterised by high economic activity, relatively high socioeconomic status, and risky sexual behaviour. Localised HIV prevention interventions specifically tailored to the populations at risk will be essential to curb transmission. More fine-scale geospatial mapping of key populations,—such as sex workers and migrant populations—could help us further understand the drivers of these areas with high levels of transmission and help us determine how they fuel the generalised epidemics in SSA.

HIV/AIDS deaths in the U.S. have dropped significantly in recent years. In 1995, the death rate from HIV per 100,000 people was ****. That number has since decreased to *** per 100,000 as of 2023. The reduction in the HIV death rate in the U.S. can be attributed to an increase in access to HIV medications. HIV/AIDS in the U.S. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) cause a systemic viral infection that damages the immune system. AIDS is a syndrome that is caused by HIV. AIDS is when the immune system is severely weakened by HIV and the body can no longer fight off infections. Among all U.S. states, Georgia, followed by Florida and Louisiana, had the highest rates of new HIV diagnoses in 2022. HIV/AIDS treatments in the U.S. HIV/AIDS treatments include antiretroviral medications to reduce the levels of HIV within the body. The largest funders for HIV/AIDS medications and research are the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Ryan White Program. The top HIV drug worldwide, based on revenue generated in 2023 was Biktarvy. Around the world, access to antiretroviral treatment has increased dramatically in recent years, a huge step in reducing the number of HIV-related deaths. There is currently no cure for HIV.

In 2024, the number of diagnosed HIV cases in Mexico amounted to approximately 19,000. That year, the State of Mexico, Veracruz, and Mexico City were the federative entities with the highest number of people diagnosed with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), with more than 1,000 patients each. Moreover, most registered HIV cases in the Latin American country between 1984 and 2023 corresponded to men. People living with HIV in Latin America In the last few years, the number of people living with HIV in Latin America has been increasing. According to recent estimates, the number of individuals living with this condition rose from around 1.6 million in 2013 to almost 2.2 million by 2022. From a country perspective, Brazil and Mexico were the Latin American nations where most people were living with the disease, reaching approximately 990,000 and 370,000 patients, respectively. ART is more costly in Latin America HIV is commonly treated through antiretroviral therapy (ART), a drug-based treatment aimed at reducing the viral load in the blood to help control the development of the disease while improving the health of those infected. Although the share of deaths among people living with HIV due to causes unrelated to AIDS increased globally since 2010, there are still inequalities in the access to ART therapy. As of 2022, Latin America and the Caribbean recorded the highest average price per person for HIV antiretroviral therapy compared to other regions worldwide.

Models of County-level Correlates of Higher HIV Rates, Southern Counties with Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), American Community Survey, United States, 2014 (n = 69 counties).

United States US: Incidence of HIV: % of Uninfected Population Aged 15-49 data was reported at 0.020 % in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.020 % for 2013. United States US: Incidence of HIV: % of Uninfected Population Aged 15-49 data is updated yearly, averaging 0.030 % from Dec 2008 (Median) to 2014, with 7 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.030 % in 2012 and a record low of 0.020 % in 2014. United States US: Incidence of HIV: % of Uninfected Population Aged 15-49 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Number of new HIV infections among uninfected populations ages 15-49 expressed per 100 uninfected population in the year before the period.; ; UNAIDS estimates.; Weighted Average;

Users can access population data related to the screening, prevalence, and incidence of HIV and AIDS in the United States. Background The HIV/AIDS Statistics and Surveillance data is maintained by the Centers for Disease Control. Annual reports, fact sheets, slide sets, and basic statistics are available in a variety of formats. Fact sheets are available for a variety of subgroups including but not limited to examining HIV prevalence among different races, ages, and sexual orientations. Slide sets looking at HIV and AIDS prevalence among different groups and different regions are also available. The HIV Surveillance Report is available on an annual basis. User functionality Data is presented in report or fact sheet format and can be downloaded in PDF or HTML formats. Slide sets are available in PDF or PowerPoint format. Basic statistics and other information is avaible in HTML format. Data Notes The data sources are clearly referenced for each report, chart, and fact sheet. The most recent data is from 2009. Reports are published annually in the late summer or early fall

IntroductionAlthough HIV infection and its associated co-morbidities remain the commonest reason for hospitalisation in Africa, their impact on economic costs and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) are not well understood. This information is essential for decision-makers to make informed choices about how to best scale-up anti-retroviral treatment (ART) programmes. This study aimed to quantify the impact of HIV infection and ART on economic outcomes in a prospective cohort of hospitalised patients with high HIV prevalence.MethodsSequential medical admissions to Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi, between June-December 2014 were followed until discharge, with standardised classification of medical diagnosis and estimation of healthcare resources used. Primary costing studies estimated total health provider cost by medical diagnosis. Participants were interviewed to establish direct non-medical and indirect costs. Costs were adjusted to 2014 US$ and INT$. HRQoL was measured using the EuroQol EQ-5D. Multivariable analyses estimated predictors of economic outcomes.ResultsOf 892 eligible participants, 80.4% (647/892) were recruited and medical notes found. In total, 447/647 (69.1%) participants were HIV-positive, 339/447 (75.8%) were on ART prior to admission, and 134/647 (20.7%) died in hospital. Mean duration of admission for HIV-positive participants not on ART and HIV-positive participants on ART was 15.0 days (95%CI: 12.0–18.0) and 12.2 days (95%CI: 10.8–13.7) respectively, compared to 10.8 days (95%CI: 8.8–12.8) for HIV-negative participants. Mean total provider cost per hospital admission was US$74.78 (bootstrap 95%CI: US$25.41-US$124.15) higher for HIV-positive than HIV-negative participants. Amongst HIV-positive participants, the mean total provider cost was US$106.87 (bootstrap 95%CI: US$25.09-US$106.87) lower for those on ART than for those not on ART. The mean total direct non-medical and indirect cost per hospital admission was US$87.84. EQ-5D utility scores were lower amongst HIV-positive participants, but not significantly different between those on and not on ART.ConclusionsHIV-related hospital care poses substantial financial burdens on health systems and patients; however, per-admission costs are substantially lower for those already initiated onto ART prior to admission. These potential cost savings could offset some of the additional resources needed to provide universal access to ART.

Objective: To examine if the rankings of state HIV age-standardized death rates (ASDRs) changed if different standard population (SP) was used.

Design: A cross-sectional population-based observational study. Setting 36 states in the United States.

Participants: People died from 2015 to 2019.

Main outcome measures: State HIV ASDR using 4 SPs, namely WHO2000, US2000, US2mor020, and Eur2011–2030.

Results: The rankings of 19 states did not change when ASDRs were calculated using US2000 and US2020. Of the 17 states whose rankings changed, the rankings of 9 states calculated using US2000 were higher than those calculated using US2020; in 8 states, the rankings were lower. The states with the greatest changes in rankings between US2000 and US2020 were Kentucky (12th and 9th, respectively) and Massachusetts (8th and 11th, respectively).

Conclusions: State ASDRs calculated using the current official SP (US2000) weigh middle-age HIV death rates more heavily than older-age HIV death rates, resulting in lower ASDRs among states with higher older-age HIV death rates.

BackgroundWashington DC has a high burden of HIV with a 2.0% HIV prevalence. The city is a national and international hub potentially containing a broad diversity of HIV variants; yet few sequences from DC are available on GenBank to assess the evolutionary history of HIV in the US capital. Towards this general goal, here we analyze extensive sequence data and investigate HIV diversity, phylodynamics, and drug resistant mutations (DRM) in DC.MethodsMolecular HIV-1 sequences were collected from participants infected through 2015 as part of the DC Cohort, a longitudinal observational study of HIV+ patients receiving care at 13 DC clinics. Sequences were paired with Cohort demographic, risk, and clinical data and analyzed using maximum likelihood, Bayesian and coalescent approaches of phylogenetic, network and population genetic inference. We analyzed 601 sequences from 223 participants for int (~864 bp) and 2,810 sequences from 1,659 participants for PR/RT (~1497 bp).ResultsNinety-nine and 94% of the int and PR/RT sequences, respectively, were identified as subtype B, with 14 non-B subtypes also detected. Phylodynamic analyses of US born infected individuals showed that HIV population size varied little over time with no significant decline in diversity. Phylogenetic analyses grouped 13.5% of the int sequences into 14 clusters of 2 or 3 sequences, and 39.0% of the PR/RT sequences into 203 clusters of 2–32 sequences. Network analyses grouped 3.6% of the int sequences into 4 clusters of 2 sequences, and 10.6% of the PR/RT sequences into 76 clusters of 2–7 sequences. All network clusters were detected in our phylogenetic analyses. Higher proportions of clustered sequences were found in zip codes where HIV prevalence is highest (r = 0.607; P