100+ datasets found
  1. Data from: Survey: Open Science in Higher Education

    • zenodo.org
    • explore.openaire.eu
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 3, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel; Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel (2024). Survey: Open Science in Higher Education [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400518
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 3, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel; Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Open Science in (Higher) Education – data of the February 2017 survey

    This data set contains:

    • Full raw (anonymised) data set (completed responses) of Open Science in (Higher) Education February 2017 survey. Data are in xlsx and sav format.
    • Survey questionnaires with variables and settings (German original and English translation) in pdf. The English questionnaire was not used in the February 2017 survey, but only serves as translation.
    • Readme file (txt)

    Survey structure

    The survey includes 24 questions and its structure can be separated in five major themes: material used in courses (5), OER awareness, usage and development (6), collaborative tools used in courses (2), assessment and participation options (5), demographics (4). The last two questions include an open text questions about general issues on the topics and singular open education experiences, and a request on forwarding the respondent’s e-mail address for further questionings. The online survey was created with Limesurvey[1]. Several questions include filters, i.e. these questions were only shown if a participants did choose a specific answer beforehand ([n/a] in Excel file, [.] In SPSS).

    Demographic questions

    Demographic questions asked about the current position, the discipline, birth year and gender. The classification of research disciplines was adapted to general disciplines at German higher education institutions. As we wanted to have a broad classification, we summarised several disciplines and came up with the following list, including the option “other” for respondents who do not feel confident with the proposed classification:

    • Natural Sciences
    • Arts and Humanities or Social Sciences
    • Economics
    • Law
    • Medicine
    • Computer Sciences, Engineering, Technics
    • Other

    The current job position classification was also chosen according to common positions in Germany, including positions with a teaching responsibility at higher education institutions. Here, we also included the option “other” for respondents who do not feel confident with the proposed classification:

    • Professor
    • Special education teacher
    • Academic/scientific assistant or research fellow (research and teaching)
    • Academic staff (teaching)
    • Student assistant
    • Other

    We chose to have a free text (numerical) for asking about a respondent’s year of birth because we did not want to pre-classify respondents’ age intervals. It leaves us options to have different analysis on answers and possible correlations to the respondents’ age. Asking about the country was left out as the survey was designed for academics in Germany.

    Remark on OER question

    Data from earlier surveys revealed that academics suffer confusion about the proper definition of OER[2]. Some seem to understand OER as free resources, or only refer to open source software (Allen & Seaman, 2016, p. 11). Allen and Seaman (2016) decided to give a broad explanation of OER, avoiding details to not tempt the participant to claim “aware”. Thus, there is a danger of having a bias when giving an explanation. We decided not to give an explanation, but keep this question simple. We assume that either someone knows about OER or not. If they had not heard of the term before, they do not probably use OER (at least not consciously) or create them.

    Data collection

    The target group of the survey was academics at German institutions of higher education, mainly universities and universities of applied sciences. To reach them we sent the survey to diverse institutional-intern and extern mailing lists and via personal contacts. Included lists were discipline-based lists, lists deriving from higher education and higher education didactic communities as well as lists from open science and OER communities. Additionally, personal e-mails were sent to presidents and contact persons from those communities, and Twitter was used to spread the survey.

    The survey was online from Feb 6th to March 3rd 2017, e-mails were mainly sent at the beginning and around mid-term.

    Data clearance

    We got 360 responses, whereof Limesurvey counted 208 completes and 152 incompletes. Two responses were marked as incomplete, but after checking them turned out to be complete, and we added them to the complete responses dataset. Thus, this data set includes 210 complete responses. From those 150 incomplete responses, 58 respondents did not answer 1st question, 40 respondents discontinued after 1st question. Data shows a constant decline in response answers, we did not detect any striking survey question with a high dropout rate. We deleted incomplete responses and they are not in this data set.

    Due to data privacy reasons, we deleted seven variables automatically assigned by Limesurvey: submitdate, lastpage, startlanguage, startdate, datestamp, ipaddr, refurl. We also deleted answers to question No 24 (email address).

    References

    Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2015-16.

    First results of the survey are presented in the poster:

    Heck, Tamara, Blümel, Ina, Heller, Lambert, Mazarakis, Athanasios, Peters, Isabella, Scherp, Ansgar, & Weisel, Luzian. (2017). Survey: Open Science in Higher Education. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400561

    Contact:

    Open Science in (Higher) Education working group, see http://www.leibniz-science20.de/forschung/projekte/laufende-projekte/open-science-in-higher-education/.

    [1] https://www.limesurvey.org

    [2] The survey question about the awareness of OER gave a broad explanation, avoiding details to not tempt the participant to claim “aware”.

  2. Highest level of education by census year, visible minority and generation...

    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • open.canada.ca
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 9, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of Canada, Statistics Canada (2022). Highest level of education by census year, visible minority and generation status: Canada, provinces and territories, census metropolitan areas and census agglomerations [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25318/9810042901-eng
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 9, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canadahttps://statcan.gc.ca/en
    Area covered
    Canada
    Description

    Historical Census data (2006, 2011, 2016 and 2021) on highest certificate, diploma or degree of visible minority groups, including percentages.

  3. Predominant Educational Attainment

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Mar 3, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri JSAPI (2015). Predominant Educational Attainment [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/4abe6a830b8f466dacf8abfde567a781
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 3, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri JSAPI
    Area covered
    Description

    This map answers the question "What is the most common, or predominant, education level for people in this area?" The map shows predominant educational attainment in each census tract. Darker colors indicate a greater gap between the predominant group and the next largest group.The U.S. Census Bureau asks citizens to indicate how far they went in formal education. The database includes seven different columns, each representing a count of population by that education level. A simple routine in compares the seven columns of information, and finds which one has the highest value, writing that to a string field. Each tract's transparency is set by a transparency field added to the data.Predominance maps can be created in ArcGIS Online by adding two fields, calculating their values, and setting up the renderer based on those two fields. See this blog by Jim Herries for details on how to create a predominance map in ArcGIS Online from any feature layer.See this GitHub repo by Jennifer Bell for a script you can run in ArcMap as a script tool, to calculate predominance for any columns of data you have.

  4. G

    Problem-solving in technology-rich environments - Distribution of...

    • open.canada.ca
    • www150.statcan.gc.ca
    • +1more
    csv, html, xml
    Updated Dec 10, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada (2024). Problem-solving in technology-rich environments - Distribution of non-respondents and proficiency levels, by labour force status, highest level of education and age group, inactive [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/en/dataset/5f132893-f839-4fab-9c58-ba2382f99188
    Explore at:
    html, csv, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canada
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Problem-solving in technology-rich environments (PS-TRE) - Distribution of non-respondents and proficiency levels, by labour force status, highest level of education and age group, population aged 16-65, Canada, provinces and territories 2012.

  5. Data from: University of Washington - Beyond High School (UW-BHS)

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    • search.datacite.org
    ascii, delimited, r +3
    Updated Feb 15, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Hirschman, Charles; Almgren, Gunnar (2016). University of Washington - Beyond High School (UW-BHS) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR33321.v5
    Explore at:
    delimited, r, ascii, spss, stata, sasAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2016
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    Authors
    Hirschman, Charles; Almgren, Gunnar
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/33321/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/33321/terms

    Time period covered
    2000 - 2010
    Area covered
    United States, Washington
    Description

    The University of Washington - Beyond High School (UW-BHS) project surveyed students in Washington State to examine factors impacting educational attainment and the transition to adulthood among high school seniors. The project began in 1999 in an effort to assess the impact of I-200 (the referendum that ended Affirmative Action) on minority enrollment in higher education in Washington. The research objectives of the project were: (1) to describe and explain differences in the transition from high school to college by race and ethnicity, socioeconomic origins, and other characteristics, (2) to evaluate the impact of the Washington State Achievers Program, and (3) to explore the implications of multiple race and ethnic identities. Following a successful pilot survey in the spring of 2000, the project eventually included baseline and one-year follow-up surveys (conducted in 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005) of almost 10,000 high school seniors in five cohorts across several Washington school districts. The high school senior surveys included questions that explored students' educational aspirations and future career plans, as well as questions on family background, home life, perceptions of school and home environments, self-esteem, and participation in school related and non-school related activities. To supplement the 2000, 2002, and 2003 student surveys, parents of high school seniors were also queried to determine their expectations and aspirations for their child's education, as well as their own educational backgrounds and fields of employment. Parents were also asked to report any financial measures undertaken to prepare for their child's continued education, and whether the household received any form of financial assistance. In 2010, a ten-year follow-up with the 2000 senior cohort was conducted to assess educational, career, and familial outcomes. The ten year follow-up surveys collected information on educational attainment, early employment experiences, family and partnership, civic engagement, and health status. The baseline, parent, and follow-up surveys also collected detailed demographic information, including age, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, education level, employment, income, marital status, and parental status.

  6. g

    Average scores in literacy, numeracy and adaptive problem solving, by...

    • gimi9.com
    Updated Dec 11, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Average scores in literacy, numeracy and adaptive problem solving, by highest level of education, age group and gender | gimi9.com [Dataset]. https://gimi9.com/dataset/ca_b586997f-e183-4f2a-8d68-39cfa082526b
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 11, 2024
    Description

    Average scores in literacy, numeracy and adaptive problem solving, by highest level of education, age group and gender, population aged 16 to 65, Canada and provinces, 2022.

  7. t

    Early leavers from education and training, age group 18-24 - Vdataset - LDM

    • service.tib.eu
    Updated Jan 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Early leavers from education and training, age group 18-24 - Vdataset - LDM [Dataset]. https://service.tib.eu/ldmservice/dataset/eurostat_wmp4wc6fl3ydzu9meitfgg
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 8, 2025
    Description

    Early leavers from education and training refers to persons aged 18 to 24 fulfilling the following two conditions: first, the highest level of education or training attained is ISCED 0, 1, 2 or 3c short, second, respondents declared not having received any education or training in the four weeks preceding the survey (numerator). The denominator consists of the total population of the same age group, excluding no answers to the questions 'highest level of education or training attained' and 'participation to education and training'.

  8. C

    Pittsburgh American Community Survey 2015, School Enrollment

    • data.wprdc.org
    csv, txt
    Updated Jun 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    City of Pittsburgh (2024). Pittsburgh American Community Survey 2015, School Enrollment [Dataset]. https://data.wprdc.org/dataset/pittsburgh-american-community-survey-2015-school-enrollment
    Explore at:
    csv, txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 7, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    City of Pittsburgh
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Pittsburgh
    Description

    School enrollment data are used to assess the socioeconomic condition of school-age children. Government agencies also require these data for funding allocations and program planning and implementation.

    Data on school enrollment and grade or level attending were derived from answers to Question 10 in the 2015 American Community Survey (ACS). People were classified as enrolled in school if they were attending a public or private school or college at any time during the 3 months prior to the time of interview. The question included instructions to “include only nursery or preschool, kindergarten, elementary school, home school, and schooling which leads to a high school diploma, or a college degree.” Respondents who did not answer the enrollment question were assigned the enrollment status and type of school of a person with the same age, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino origin whose residence was in the same or nearby area.

    School enrollment is only recorded if the schooling advances a person toward an elementary school certificate, a high school diploma, or a college, university, or professional school (such as law or medicine) degree. Tutoring or correspondence schools are included if credit can be obtained from a public or private school or college. People enrolled in “vocational, technical, or business school” such as post secondary vocational, trade, hospital school, and on job training were not reported as enrolled in school. Field interviewers were instructed to classify individuals who were home schooled as enrolled in private school. The guide sent out with the mail questionnaire includes instructions for how to classify home schoolers.

    Enrolled in Public and Private School – Includes people who attended school in the reference period and indicated they were enrolled by marking one of the questionnaire categories for “public school, public college,” or “private school, private college, home school.” The instruction guide defines a public school as “any school or college controlled and supported primarily by a local, county, state, or federal government.” Private schools are defined as schools supported and controlled primarily by religious organizations or other private groups. Home schools are defined as “parental-guided education outside of public or private school for grades 1-12.” Respondents who marked both the “public” and “private” boxes are edited to the first entry, “public.”

    Grade in Which Enrolled – From 1999-2007, in the ACS, people reported to be enrolled in “public school, public college” or “private school, private college” were classified by grade or level according to responses to Question 10b, “What grade or level was this person attending?” Seven levels were identified: “nursery school, preschool;” “kindergarten;” elementary “grade 1 to grade 4” or “grade 5 to grade 8;” high school “grade 9 to grade 12;” “college undergraduate years (freshman to senior);” and “graduate or professional school (for example: medical, dental, or law school).”

    In 2008, the school enrollment questions had several changes. “Home school” was explicitly included in the “private school, private college” category. For question 10b the categories changed to the following “Nursery school, preschool,” “Kindergarten,” “Grade 1 through grade 12,” “College undergraduate years (freshman to senior),” “Graduate or professional school beyond a bachelor’s degree (for example: MA or PhD program, or medical or law school).” The survey question allowed a write-in for the grades enrolled from 1-12.

    Question/Concept History – Since 1999, the ACS enrollment status question (Question 10a) refers to “regular school or college,” while the 1996-1998 ACS did not restrict reporting to “regular” school, and contained an additional category for the “vocational, technical or business school.” The 1996-1998 ACS used the educational attainment question to estimate level of enrollment for those reported to be enrolled in school, and had a single year write-in for the attainment of grades 1 through 11. Grade levels estimated using the attainment question were not consistent with other estimates, so a new question specifically asking grade or level of enrollment was added starting with the 1999 ACS questionnaire.

    Limitation of the Data – Beginning in 2006, the population universe in the ACS includes people living in group quarters. Data users may see slight differences in levels of school enrollment in any given geographic area due to the inclusion of this population. The extent of this difference, if any, depends on the type of group quarters present and whether the group quarters population makes up a large proportion of the total population. For example, in areas that are home to several colleges and universities, the percent of individuals 18 to 24 who were enrolled in college or graduate school would increase, as people living in college dormitories are now included in the universe.

  9. c

    Williams Committee Surveys: National Educational Survey, 1977; National...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    Updated Nov 28, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Beed, T. W., University of Sydney (2024). Williams Committee Surveys: National Educational Survey, 1977; National Survey of Post Secondary Teaching Staff, 1977 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-1477-1
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Sample Survey Centre
    Authors
    Beed, T. W., University of Sydney
    Time period covered
    Sep 1, 1977 - Dec 1, 1977
    Area covered
    Australia
    Variables measured
    Groups, National, Students, Teachers
    Measurement technique
    Postal survey
    Description

    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.


    The surveys were commissioned by the Committee of Inquiry into Education and Training, set up by the Australian Government, in order to gather information from students and staff in all sectors of Australian post-secondary education. Areas covered include characteristics of students and staff, career choice, preparation and planning and attitudes towards issues of importance to post-secondary education in the seventies.
    Main Topics:

    Attitudinal/Behavioural Variables
    A. National Educational Survey, 1977
    Date left secondary school, type and location, qualifications attained, whether specialised in any subjects, relative standard achieved (e.g. above/below average). Whether intended to enter university/college or follow a specific career. Whether entered a university/college, qualifications obtained. Whether worked full-time for more than six months. Whether currently enrolled in a university or college and details of courses, whether currently in employment and details. Whether recently changed or given up any courses - if so, reasons, future plans if not currently enrolled. Attributes of a typical teacher at respondent's college/university (e.g. inspires confidence, displays enthusiasm), whether agrees/disagrees with several statements concerning courses, reasons for current enrolment, whether present course and institution was first preference, overall evaluation of course and institution, relative standard achieved, whether committed to work for a particular employer when graduated, expected ease of obtaining a job, expected and preferred occupation. Time of choosing career, whether choice was restricted by subjects taken at secondary school, highest qualification would like to acquire, perceived differences between Universities, Colleges of Advanced Education and Technical Colleges. General comments were elicited concerning education and training and the effect of financial factors on career development.
    Background Variables
    Sex, age, country of birth of self and parents, no. of years lived in Australia, religion, marital status, whether has children, sources of financial support, comparison of own income (current and expected) and parents' income with the average, parents' occupations and highest level of education.
    B. National Survey of Post-Secondary Teaching Staff, 1977
    Separate questionnaires were sent to the three sectors of tertiary education. Questions asked in each include:
    Position, field of teaching, length of time in university/college teaching/at present institution, positions/ qualifications held, publications, whether currently enrolled for a degree, details of teaching responsibilities, breakdown of activities each week. Attitude towards certain activities (e.g. research, teaching, administration), assessment of the goals of higher education, opinion of ability of incoming and whether affected by expansion in post-secondary education. Expected ease with which students will obtain jobs. Opinion of courses taught and student participation in decision-making, main reasons for students giving up courses, opinion of size of institution. Attributes of a typical teacher at own institution, ways in which university/college education could be improved, whether numbers in post-secondary education/in own discipline should continue to expand and by how much, whether admission standards should be relaxed/tightened, whether student transfers between institutions should be made easier/more difficult. Perceived differences between Universities, Colleges of Advanced Education and Technical Colleges, opinion of plans to amalgamate Universities and Colleges. Areas in which expenditure cutbacks should/should not fall. Expected date of leaving current institution, whether would support early retirement schemes, overall job satisfaction, whether would accept another position elsewhere, at what salary and for what reasons. General comments regarding education and training.
    Background Variables
    Age, sex, country of birth and of first degree, length of time lived in Australia, educational and occupational background of parents.

  10. c

    Crystal Roof | Education API | Highest level of qualification

    • crystalroof.co.uk
    json
    Updated Mar 21, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CrystalRoof Ltd (2021). Crystal Roof | Education API | Highest level of qualification [Dataset]. https://crystalroof.co.uk/api-docs/method/education-highest-level-of-qualification-postcode
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 21, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    CrystalRoof Ltd
    License

    https://crystalroof.co.uk/api-terms-of-usehttps://crystalroof.co.uk/api-terms-of-use

    Area covered
    Wales, England
    Description

    This method returns Census 2021 estimates that classify usual residents aged 16 years and over by their highest level of qualification.

    The highest level of qualification is derived from the question asking people to indicate all qualifications held, or their nearest equivalent. This may include foreign qualifications where they were matched to the closest UK equivalent.

    The types of qualification included in each level are:

    • Level 1 and entry level qualifications: 1 to 4 GCSEs grade A* to C , Any GCSEs at other grades, O levels or CSEs (any grades), 1 AS level, NVQ level 1, Foundation GNVQ, Basic or Essential Skills.
    • Level 2 qualifications: 5 or more GCSEs (A* to C or 9 to 4), O levels (passes), CSEs (grade 1), School Certification, 1 A level, 2 to 3 AS levels, VCEs, Intermediate or Higher Diploma, Welsh Baccalaureate Intermediate Diploma, NVQ level 2, Intermediate GNVQ, City and Guilds Craft, BTEC First or General Diploma, RSA Diploma.
    • Level 3 qualifications: 2 or more A levels or VCEs, 4 or more AS levels, Higher School Certificate, Progression or Advanced Diploma, Welsh Baccalaureate Advance Diploma, NVQ level 3; Advanced GNVQ, City and Guilds Advanced Craft, ONC, OND, BTEC National, RSA Advanced Diploma.
    • Level 4 qualifications or above: degree (BA, BSc), higher degree (MA, PhD, PGCE), NVQ level 4 to 5, HNC, HND, RSA Higher Diploma, BTEC Higher level, professional qualifications (for example, teaching, nursing, accountancy).
    • Other qualifications: vocational or work-related qualifications, other qualifications achieved in England or Wales, qualifications achieved outside England or Wales (equivalent not stated or unknown).

    Highest level of qualification is split into 8 categories including total.

    The estimates are as at Census Day, 21 March 2021.

  11. Data from: CBS News/MTV/Gates Foundation Monthly Poll, March 2005

    • icpsr.umich.edu
    ascii, delimited, sas +2
    Updated Apr 27, 2010
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor] (2010). CBS News/MTV/Gates Foundation Monthly Poll, March 2005 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR04322.v2
    Explore at:
    sas, spss, ascii, delimited, stataAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 27, 2010
    Dataset provided by
    Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Researchhttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/pages/
    License

    https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/4322/termshttps://www.icpsr.umich.edu/web/ICPSR/studies/4322/terms

    Time period covered
    Mar 2005
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This special topic poll, conducted March 31-April 9, 2005, is part of a continuing series of monthly surveys that solicit public opinion on the presidency and on a range of other political and social issues. A national sample of 1,586 respondents aged 14 to 24 years was surveyed, including oversamples of African American youth, Hispanic youth, and 14- to 20-year olds. Despite being termed a monthly poll, the foci of this poll were the opinions and judgments of teenagers and young adults about various aspects of the education system and process in the United States. Views were sought on the most important problem facing young people, the highest level of education respondents hoped to achieve, the highest level they expected to actually achieve, and whether a college degree was necessary to "get ahead". Respondents were asked about their plans after high school, the quality of their high school and its teachers and staff, whether their high school education was adequately preparing them for college and/or the job market, what measures respondents took or would like take to improve their chances of getting into the college of their choice, the importance of grade point averages and performance on standardized tests in getting into college, and their ability to get information about educational opportunities. Similar questions were asked of those respondents who were college students, regarding assistance received from college professors, the importance of internships, and whether college was adequately preparing them to get a well-paying job after graduation. Additional questions addressed MTV's involvement in issues concerning young people and how much impact MTV could have in raising awareness among young people about the importance of education. Demographic information includes age, race, sex, education, employment status, ethnicity, parents' education, perceived social class, level of religious participation, religious preference, whether respondents considered themselves to be an evangelical or born-again Christian, and the presence of other household members between the ages of 14 and 24.

  12. G

    Average scores in literacy, numeracy and adaptive problem solving, by...

    • open.canada.ca
    csv, html, xml
    Updated Dec 10, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statistics Canada (2024). Average scores in literacy, numeracy and adaptive problem solving, by highest level of education, age group and gender [Dataset]. https://open.canada.ca/data/dataset/b586997f-e183-4f2a-8d68-39cfa082526b
    Explore at:
    xml, html, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Statistics Canada
    License

    Open Government Licence - Canada 2.0https://open.canada.ca/en/open-government-licence-canada
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Average scores in literacy, numeracy and adaptive problem solving, by highest level of education, age group and gender, population aged 16 to 65, Canada and provinces, 2022.

  13. m

    Dataset Question Answering for Admission of Higher Education Institution

    • data.mendeley.com
    Updated Sep 26, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Emny Yossy (2023). Dataset Question Answering for Admission of Higher Education Institution [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.17632/jc4df8srcb.2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 26, 2023
    Authors
    Emny Yossy
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    The data collection process commenced with web scraping of a selected higher education institution's website, collecting any data that relates to the admission topic of higher education institutions, during the period from July to September 2023. This resulted in a raw dataset primarily cantered around admission-related content. Subsequently, meticulous data cleaning and organization procedures were implemented to refine the dataset. The primary data, in its raw form before annotation into a question-and-answer format, was predominantly in the Indonesian language. Following this, a comprehensive annotation process was conducted to enrich the dataset with specific admission-related information, transforming it into secondary data. Both primary and secondary data predominantly remained in the Indonesian language. To enhance data quality, we added filters to remove or exclude: 1) data not in the Indonesian language, 2) data unrelated to the admission topic, and 3) redundant entries. This meticulous curation has culminated in the creation of a finalized dataset, meticulously prepared and now readily available for research and analysis in the domain of higher education admission.

  14. Predominant Educational Attainment in NYC

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Dec 7, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Esri JSAPI (2015). Predominant Educational Attainment in NYC [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/jsapi::predominant-educational-attainment-in-nyc/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 7, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Authors
    Esri JSAPI
    Area covered
    Description

    This map answers the question "What is the most common, or predominant, education level for people in this area?" The map shows predominant educational attainment in each census tract. Darker colors indicate a greater gap between the predominant group and the next largest group.The U.S. Census Bureau asks citizens to indicate how far they went in formal education. The database includes seven different columns, each representing a count of population by that education level. A simple routine in compares the seven columns of information, and finds which one has the highest value, writing that to a string field. Each tract's transparency is set by a transparency field added to the data.Predominance maps can be created in ArcGIS Online by adding two fields, calculating their values, and setting up the renderer based on those two fields. See this blog by Jim Herries for details on how to create a predominance map in ArcGIS Online from any feature layer.See this GitHub repo by Jennifer Bell for a script you can run in ArcMap as a script tool, to calculate predominance for any columns of data you have.

  15. Assessing Mathematics Learning in Higher Education

    • kaggle.com
    Updated Aug 20, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    agshiv92 (2024). Assessing Mathematics Learning in Higher Education [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/agshiv92/assessing-mathematics-learning-in-higher-education/discussion?sort=undefined
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Aug 20, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Kagglehttp://kaggle.com/
    Authors
    agshiv92
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Description

    MathE is a mathematical platform developed under the MathE project (mathe.pixel-online.org). The dataset has 9546 answers to questions in the Mathematical topics taught in higher education. The file has eight features, named: Student ID, Student Country, Question ID, Type of answer (correct or incorrect), Question level (basic or advanced), Math Topic, Math Subtopic, and Question Keywords. The question level was associated with the professor who submitted the question. The data was obtained from February 2019 until December 2023.

  16. A

    Pittsburgh American Community Survey 2015, School Enrollment

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    csv, text
    Updated Jul 30, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    United States[old] (2019). Pittsburgh American Community Survey 2015, School Enrollment [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/ko_KR/dataset/pittsburgh-american-community-survey-2015-school-enrollment
    Explore at:
    csv, textAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jul 30, 2019
    Dataset provided by
    United States[old]
    Area covered
    Pittsburgh
    Description

    School enrollment data are used to assess the socioeconomic condition of school-age children. Government agencies also require these data for funding allocations and program planning and implementation.

    Data on school enrollment and grade or level attending were derived from answers to Question 10 in the 2015 American Community Survey (ACS). People were classified as enrolled in school if they were attending a public or private school or college at any time during the 3 months prior to the time of interview. The question included instructions to “include only nursery or preschool, kindergarten, elementary school, home school, and schooling which leads to a high school diploma, or a college degree.” Respondents who did not answer the enrollment question were assigned the enrollment status and type of school of a person with the same age, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino origin whose residence was in the same or nearby area.

    School enrollment is only recorded if the schooling advances a person toward an elementary school certificate, a high school diploma, or a college, university, or professional school (such as law or medicine) degree. Tutoring or correspondence schools are included if credit can be obtained from a public or private school or college. People enrolled in “vocational, technical, or business school” such as post secondary vocational, trade, hospital school, and on job training were not reported as enrolled in school. Field interviewers were instructed to classify individuals who were home schooled as enrolled in private school. The guide sent out with the mail questionnaire includes instructions for how to classify home schoolers.

    Enrolled in Public and Private School – Includes people who attended school in the reference period and indicated they were enrolled by marking one of the questionnaire categories for “public school, public college,” or “private school, private college, home school.” The instruction guide defines a public school as “any school or college controlled and supported primarily by a local, county, state, or federal government.” Private schools are defined as schools supported and controlled primarily by religious organizations or other private groups. Home schools are defined as “parental-guided education outside of public or private school for grades 1-12.” Respondents who marked both the “public” and “private” boxes are edited to the first entry, “public.”

    Grade in Which Enrolled – From 1999-2007, in the ACS, people reported to be enrolled in “public school, public college” or “private school, private college” were classified by grade or level according to responses to Question 10b, “What grade or level was this person attending?” Seven levels were identified: “nursery school, preschool;” “kindergarten;” elementary “grade 1 to grade 4” or “grade 5 to grade 8;” high school “grade 9 to grade 12;” “college undergraduate years (freshman to senior);” and “graduate or professional school (for example: medical, dental, or law school).”

    In 2008, the school enrollment questions had several changes. “Home school” was explicitly included in the “private school, private college” category. For question 10b the categories changed to the following “Nursery school, preschool,” “Kindergarten,” “Grade 1 through grade 12,” “College undergraduate years (freshman to senior),” “Graduate or professional school beyond a bachelor’s degree (for example: MA or PhD program, or medical or law school).” The survey question allowed a write-in for the grades enrolled from 1-12.

    Question/Concept History – Since 1999, the ACS enrollment status question (Question 10a) refers to “regular school or college,” while the 1996-1998 ACS did not restrict reporting to “regular” school, and contained an additional category for the “vocational, technical or business school.” The 1996-1998 ACS used the educational attainment question to estimate level of enrollment for those reported to be enrolled in school, and had a single year write-in for the attainment of grades 1 through 11. Grade levels estimated using the attainment question were not consistent with other estimates, so a new question specifically asking grade or level of enrollment was added starting with the 1999 ACS questionnaire.

    Limitation of the Data – Beginning in 2006, the population universe in the ACS includes people living in group quarters. Data users may see slight differences in levels of school enrollment in any given geographic area due to the inclusion of this population. The extent of this difference, if any, depends on the type of group quarters present and whether the group quarters population makes up a large proportion of the total population. For example, in areas that are home to several colleges and universities, the percent of individuals 18 to 24 who were enrolled in college or graduate school would increase, as people living in college dormitories are now included in the universe.

  17. h

    MMLU-Pro-education-level

    • huggingface.co
    Updated May 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    LARSS (2025). MMLU-Pro-education-level [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/LabARSS/MMLU-Pro-education-level
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    LARSS
    License

    MIT Licensehttps://opensource.org/licenses/MIT
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Dataset Card for MMLU Pro with education levels

    MMLU Pro dataset with education levels

      Dataset Details
    
    
    
    
    
      Dataset Description
    

    A popular human-like complexity metric is an education level that is appropriate for a question. To get it for MMLU Pro dataset, we ask a large LLM (Mistral 123B) to act as a judge and return its estimate. Next, we query the large LLM again to estimate the quality of the previous assessment from 1 to 10 following the practice introduced… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/LabARSS/MMLU-Pro-education-level.

  18. England and Wales Census 2021 - RM047: Highest level of qualification by...

    • statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk
    csv, json, xlsx
    Updated Jun 10, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics; National Records of Scotland; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; UK Data Service. (2024). England and Wales Census 2021 - RM047: Highest level of qualification by country of birth [Dataset]. https://statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk/dataset/england-and-wales-census-2021-rm047-highest-level-of-qualification-by-country-of-birth
    Explore at:
    csv, json, xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency
    Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
    UK Data Servicehttps://ukdataservice.ac.uk/
    Authors
    Office for National Statistics; National Records of Scotland; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; UK Data Service.
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Wales, England
    Description

    This dataset provides Census 2021 estimates that classify usual residents aged 16 years and over in England and Wales by highest level of qualification and by country of birth. The estimates are as at Census Day, 21 March 2021.

    There are quality considerations about higher education qualifications, including those at Level 4+, responses from older people and international migrants, and comparability with 2011 Census data. Read more about this quality notice.

    Area type

    Census 2021 statistics are published for a number of different geographies. These can be large, for example the whole of England, or small, for example an output area (OA), the lowest level of geography for which statistics are produced.

    For higher levels of geography, more detailed statistics can be produced. When a lower level of geography is used, such as output areas (which have a minimum of 100 persons), the statistics produced have less detail. This is to protect the confidentiality of people and ensure that individuals or their characteristics cannot be identified.

    Lower tier local authorities

    Lower tier local authorities provide a range of local services. There are 309 lower tier local authorities in England made up of 181 non-metropolitan districts, 59 unitary authorities, 36 metropolitan districts and 33 London boroughs (including City of London). In Wales there are 22 local authorities made up of 22 unitary authorities.

    Coverage

    Census 2021 statistics are published for the whole of England and Wales. However, you can choose to filter areas by:

    • country - for example, Wales
    • region - for example, London
    • local authority - for example, Cornwall
    • health area – for example, Clinical Commissioning Group
    • statistical area - for example, MSOA or LSOA

    Highest level of qualification

    The highest level of qualification is derived from the question asking people to indicate all qualifications held, or their nearest equivalent.

    This may include foreign qualifications where they were matched to the closest UK equivalent.

    Country of birth

    The country in which a person was born.

    For people not born in one of in the four parts of the UK, there was an option to select "elsewhere".

    People who selected "elsewhere" were asked to write in the current name for their country of birth.

  19. England and Wales Census 2021 - RM055: Highest level of qualification by sex...

    • statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk
    csv, json, xlsx
    Updated Jun 10, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Office for National Statistics; National Records of Scotland; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; UK Data Service. (2024). England and Wales Census 2021 - RM055: Highest level of qualification by sex [Dataset]. https://statistics.ukdataservice.ac.uk/dataset/england-and-wales-census-2021-rm055-highest-level-of-qualification-by-sex
    Explore at:
    xlsx, csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 10, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency
    Office for National Statisticshttp://www.ons.gov.uk/
    UK Data Servicehttps://ukdataservice.ac.uk/
    Authors
    Office for National Statistics; National Records of Scotland; Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency; UK Data Service.
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Wales, England
    Description

    This dataset provides Census 2021 estimates that classify usual residents aged 16 years and over in England and Wales by highest level of qualification and by sex. The estimates are as at Census Day, 21 March 2021.

    There are quality considerations about higher education qualifications, including those at Level 4+, responses from older people and international migrants, and comparability with 2011 Census data. Read more about this quality notice.

    Area type

    Census 2021 statistics are published for a number of different geographies. These can be large, for example the whole of England, or small, for example an output area (OA), the lowest level of geography for which statistics are produced.

    For higher levels of geography, more detailed statistics can be produced. When a lower level of geography is used, such as output areas (which have a minimum of 100 persons), the statistics produced have less detail. This is to protect the confidentiality of people and ensure that individuals or their characteristics cannot be identified.

    Lower tier local authorities

    Lower tier local authorities provide a range of local services. There are 309 lower tier local authorities in England made up of 181 non-metropolitan districts, 59 unitary authorities, 36 metropolitan districts and 33 London boroughs (including City of London). In Wales there are 22 local authorities made up of 22 unitary authorities.

    Coverage

    Census 2021 statistics are published for the whole of England and Wales. However, you can choose to filter areas by:

    • country - for example, Wales
    • region - for example, London
    • local authority - for example, Cornwall
    • health area – for example, Clinical Commissioning Group
    • statistical area - for example, MSOA or LSOA

    Highest level of qualification

    The highest level of qualification is derived from the question asking people to indicate all qualifications held, or their nearest equivalent.

    This may include foreign qualifications where they were matched to the closest UK equivalent.

    Sex

    This is the sex recorded by the person completing the census. The options were “Female” and “Male”.

  20. Early leavers from education and training, age group 18-24

    • data.europa.eu
    csv, html, tsv, xml
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Eurostat, Early leavers from education and training, age group 18-24 [Dataset]. https://data.europa.eu/data/datasets/wmp4wc6fl3ydzu9meitfgg/?locale=en
    Explore at:
    tsv(1656), xml, html, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Eurostathttps://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Early leavers from education and training refers to persons aged 18 to 24 fulfilling the following two conditions: first, the highest level of education or training attained is ISCED 0, 1, 2 or 3c short, second, respondents declared not having received any education or training in the four weeks preceding the survey (numerator). The denominator consists of the total population of the same age group, excluding no answers to the questions 'highest level of education or training attained' and 'participation to education and training'.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel; Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel (2024). Survey: Open Science in Higher Education [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400518
Organization logo

Data from: Survey: Open Science in Higher Education

Related Article
Explore at:
Dataset updated
Aug 3, 2024
Dataset provided by
Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
Authors
Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel; Tamara Heck; Ina Blümel; Lambert Heller; Athanasios Mazarakis; Isabella Peters; Ansgar Scherp; Luzian Weisel
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Description

Open Science in (Higher) Education – data of the February 2017 survey

This data set contains:

  • Full raw (anonymised) data set (completed responses) of Open Science in (Higher) Education February 2017 survey. Data are in xlsx and sav format.
  • Survey questionnaires with variables and settings (German original and English translation) in pdf. The English questionnaire was not used in the February 2017 survey, but only serves as translation.
  • Readme file (txt)

Survey structure

The survey includes 24 questions and its structure can be separated in five major themes: material used in courses (5), OER awareness, usage and development (6), collaborative tools used in courses (2), assessment and participation options (5), demographics (4). The last two questions include an open text questions about general issues on the topics and singular open education experiences, and a request on forwarding the respondent’s e-mail address for further questionings. The online survey was created with Limesurvey[1]. Several questions include filters, i.e. these questions were only shown if a participants did choose a specific answer beforehand ([n/a] in Excel file, [.] In SPSS).

Demographic questions

Demographic questions asked about the current position, the discipline, birth year and gender. The classification of research disciplines was adapted to general disciplines at German higher education institutions. As we wanted to have a broad classification, we summarised several disciplines and came up with the following list, including the option “other” for respondents who do not feel confident with the proposed classification:

  • Natural Sciences
  • Arts and Humanities or Social Sciences
  • Economics
  • Law
  • Medicine
  • Computer Sciences, Engineering, Technics
  • Other

The current job position classification was also chosen according to common positions in Germany, including positions with a teaching responsibility at higher education institutions. Here, we also included the option “other” for respondents who do not feel confident with the proposed classification:

  • Professor
  • Special education teacher
  • Academic/scientific assistant or research fellow (research and teaching)
  • Academic staff (teaching)
  • Student assistant
  • Other

We chose to have a free text (numerical) for asking about a respondent’s year of birth because we did not want to pre-classify respondents’ age intervals. It leaves us options to have different analysis on answers and possible correlations to the respondents’ age. Asking about the country was left out as the survey was designed for academics in Germany.

Remark on OER question

Data from earlier surveys revealed that academics suffer confusion about the proper definition of OER[2]. Some seem to understand OER as free resources, or only refer to open source software (Allen & Seaman, 2016, p. 11). Allen and Seaman (2016) decided to give a broad explanation of OER, avoiding details to not tempt the participant to claim “aware”. Thus, there is a danger of having a bias when giving an explanation. We decided not to give an explanation, but keep this question simple. We assume that either someone knows about OER or not. If they had not heard of the term before, they do not probably use OER (at least not consciously) or create them.

Data collection

The target group of the survey was academics at German institutions of higher education, mainly universities and universities of applied sciences. To reach them we sent the survey to diverse institutional-intern and extern mailing lists and via personal contacts. Included lists were discipline-based lists, lists deriving from higher education and higher education didactic communities as well as lists from open science and OER communities. Additionally, personal e-mails were sent to presidents and contact persons from those communities, and Twitter was used to spread the survey.

The survey was online from Feb 6th to March 3rd 2017, e-mails were mainly sent at the beginning and around mid-term.

Data clearance

We got 360 responses, whereof Limesurvey counted 208 completes and 152 incompletes. Two responses were marked as incomplete, but after checking them turned out to be complete, and we added them to the complete responses dataset. Thus, this data set includes 210 complete responses. From those 150 incomplete responses, 58 respondents did not answer 1st question, 40 respondents discontinued after 1st question. Data shows a constant decline in response answers, we did not detect any striking survey question with a high dropout rate. We deleted incomplete responses and they are not in this data set.

Due to data privacy reasons, we deleted seven variables automatically assigned by Limesurvey: submitdate, lastpage, startlanguage, startdate, datestamp, ipaddr, refurl. We also deleted answers to question No 24 (email address).

References

Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Opening the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2015-16.

First results of the survey are presented in the poster:

Heck, Tamara, Blümel, Ina, Heller, Lambert, Mazarakis, Athanasios, Peters, Isabella, Scherp, Ansgar, & Weisel, Luzian. (2017). Survey: Open Science in Higher Education. Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.400561

Contact:

Open Science in (Higher) Education working group, see http://www.leibniz-science20.de/forschung/projekte/laufende-projekte/open-science-in-higher-education/.

[1] https://www.limesurvey.org

[2] The survey question about the awareness of OER gave a broad explanation, avoiding details to not tempt the participant to claim “aware”.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu