In 2022, Kentucky reported the highest cancer incidence rate in the United States, with around 512 new cases of cancer per 100,000 inhabitants. This statistic represents the U.S. states with the highest cancer incidence rates per 100,000 population in 2022.

In 2023, Hawaii had the lowest death rate from cancer among all U.S. states, with around 119 deaths per 100,000 population. The states with the highest cancer death rates at that time were Kentucky, West Virginia, and Mississippi. This statistic shows cancer death rates in the United States in 2023, by state.

In the following maps, the U.S. states are divided into groups based on the rates at which people developed or died from cancer in 2013, the most recent year for which incidence data are available.

The rates are the numbers out of 100,000 people who developed or died from cancer each year.

Incidence Rates by State The number of people who get cancer is called cancer incidence. In the United States, the rate of getting cancer varies from state to state.

*Rates are per 100,000 and are age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population.

‡Rates are not shown if the state did not meet USCS publication criteria or if the state did not submit data to CDC.

†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2016. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.

Death Rates by State Rates of dying from cancer also vary from state to state.

*Rates are per 100,000 and are age-adjusted to the 2000 U.S. standard population.

†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2013 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute; 2016. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/uscs.

Source: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/data/state.htm

Age standardized rate of cancer incidence, by selected sites of cancer and sex, three-year average, census metropolitan areas.

Number and rate of new cancer cases diagnosed annually from 1992 to the most recent diagnosis year available. Included are all invasive cancers and in situ bladder cancer with cases defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Groups for Primary Site based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3). Random rounding of case counts to the nearest multiple of 5 is used to prevent inappropriate disclosure of health-related information.

In 2022, the highest cancer rate for men and women among European countries was in Denmark with 728.5 cancer cases per 100,000 population. Ireland and the Netherlands followed, with 641.6 and 641.4 people diagnosed with cancer per 100,000 population, respectively.
Lung cancer Lung cancer is the deadliest type of cancer worldwide, and in Europe, Germany was the country with the highest number of lung cancer deaths in 2022, with 47.7 thousand deaths. However, when looking at the incidence rate of lung cancer, Hungary had the highest for both males and females, with 138.4 and 72.3 cases per 100,000 population, respectively.
Breast cancer Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer among women with an incidence rate of 83.3 cases per 100,000 population in Europe in 2022. Cyprus was the country with the highest incidence of breast cancer, followed by Belgium and France. The mortality rate due to breast cancer was 34.8 deaths per 100,000 population across Europe, and Cyprus was again the country with the highest figure.

The United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) online databases in WONDER provide cancer incidence and mortality data for the United States for the years since 1999, by year, state and metropolitan areas (MSA), age group, race, ethnicity, sex, childhood cancer classifications and cancer site. Report case counts, deaths, crude and age-adjusted incidence and death rates, and 95% confidence intervals for rates. The USCS data are the official federal statistics on cancer incidence from registries having high-quality data and cancer mortality statistics for 50 states and the District of Columbia. USCS are produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), in collaboration with the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR). Mortality data are provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Vital Statistics System (NVSS).

This dataset provides a detailed view of global cancer trends across the 50 most populated countries. With 160,000 records, it encompasses a wide range of variables including cancer types, risk factors, healthcare expenditure, and environmental factors. The data is designed to assist researchers, healthcare policymakers, and data scientists in identifying patterns, predicting future trends, and crafting effective cancer control strategies.

In the period 2018 to 2022, a total of approximately *** men per 100,000 inhabitants died of cancers of all kinds in the United States, compared to an overall cancer death rate of *** per 100,000 population among women. This statistic shows cancer death rates in the U.S. for the period from 2018 to 2022, by type and gender.

Exploring County-Level Correlations in Cancer Rates and Trends

A Multivariate Ordinary Least Squares Regression Model

By Noah Rippner [source]

About this dataset

This dataset offers a unique opportunity to examine the pattern and trends of county-level cancer rates in the United States at the individual county level. Using data from cancer.gov and the US Census American Community Survey, this dataset allows us to gain insight into how age-adjusted death rate, average deaths per year, and recent trends vary between counties – along with other key metrics like average annual counts, met objectives of 45.5?, recent trends (2) in death rates, etc., captured within our deep multi-dimensional dataset. We are able to build linear regression models based on our data to determine correlations between variables that can help us better understand cancers prevalence levels across different counties over time - making it easier to target health initiatives and resources accurately when necessary or desired

More Datasets

For more datasets, click here.

Featured Notebooks

• 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

How to use the dataset

This kaggle dataset provides county-level datasets from the US Census American Community Survey and cancer.gov for exploring correlations between county-level cancer rates, trends, and mortality statistics. This dataset contains records from all U.S counties concerning the age-adjusted death rate, average deaths per year, recent trend (2) in death rates, average annual count of cases detected within 5 years, and whether or not an objective of 45.5 (1) was met in the county associated with each row in the table.

To use this dataset to its fullest potential you need to understand how to perform simple descriptive analytics which includes calculating summary statistics such as mean, median or other numerical values; summarizing categorical variables using frequency tables; creating data visualizations such as charts and histograms; applying linear regression or other machine learning techniques such as support vector machines (SVMs), random forests or neural networks etc.; differentiating between supervised vs unsupervised learning techniques etc.; reviewing diagnostics tests to evaluate your models; interpreting your findings; hypothesizing possible reasons and patterns discovered during exploration made through data visualizations ; Communicating and conveying results found via effective presentation slides/documents etc.. Having this understanding will enable you apply different methods of analysis on this data set accurately ad effectively.

Once these concepts are understood you are ready start exploring this data set by first importing it into your visualization software either tableau public/ desktop version/Qlikview / SAS Analytical suite/Python notebooks for building predictive models by loading specified packages based on usage like Scikit Learn if Python is used among others depending on what tool is used . Secondly a brief description of the entire table's column structure has been provided above . Statistical operations can be carried out with simple queries after proper knowledge of basic SQL commands is attained just like queries using sub sets can also be performed with good command over selecting columns while specifying conditions applicable along with sorting operations being done based on specific attributes as required leading up towards writing python codes needed when parsing specific portion of data desired grouping / aggregating different categories before performing any kind of predictions / models can also activated create post joining few tables possible , when ever necessary once again varying across tools being used Thereby diving deep into analyzing available features determined randomly thus creating correlation matrices figures showing distribution relationships using correlation & covariance matrixes , thus making evaluations deducing informative facts since revealing trends identified through corresponding scatter plots from a given metric gathered from appropriate fields!

Research Ideas

• Building a predictive cancer incidence model based on county-level demographic data to identify high-risk areas and target public health interventions.
• Analyzing correlations between age-adjusted death rate, average annual count, and recent trends in order to develop more effective policy initiatives for cancer prevention and healthcare access.
• Utilizing the dataset to construct a machine learning algorithm that can predict county-level mortality rates based on socio-economic factors such as poverty levels and educational attainment rates

Acknowledgements

If you use this dataset i...

Cancer was responsible for around *** deaths per 100,000 population in the United States in 2023. The death rate for cancer has steadily decreased since the 1990’s, but cancer still remains the second leading cause of death in the United States. The deadliest type of cancer for both men and women is cancer of the lung and bronchus which will account for an estimated ****** deaths among men alone in 2025. Probability of surviving Survival rates for cancer vary significantly depending on the type of cancer. The cancers with the highest rates of survival include cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and testis, with five-year survival rates as high as ** percent for thyroid cancer. The cancers with the lowest five-year survival rates include cancers of the pancreas, liver, and esophagus. Risk factors It is difficult to determine why one person develops cancer while another does not, but certain risk factors have been shown to increase a person’s chance of developing cancer. For example, cigarette smoking has been proven to increase the risk of developing various cancers. In fact, around ** percent of cancers of the lung, bronchus and trachea among adults aged 30 years and older can be attributed to cigarette smoking. Other modifiable risk factors for cancer include being obese, drinking alcohol, and sun exposure.

SEER Limited-Use cancer incidence data with associated population data. Geographic areas available are county and SEER registry. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute collects and distributes high quality, comprehensive cancer data from a number of population-based cancer registries. Data include patient demographics, primary tumor site, morphology, stage at diagnosis, first course of treatment, and follow-up for vital status. The SEER Program is the only comprehensive source of population-based information in the United States that includes stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis and survival rates within each stage.

Annual percent change and average annual percent change in age-standardized cancer incidence rates since 1984 to the most recent diagnosis year. The table includes a selection of commonly diagnosed invasive cancers, as well as in situ bladder cancer. Cases are defined using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Groups for Primary Site based on the World Health Organization International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) from 1992 to the most recent data year and on the International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision (ICD-9) from 1984 to 1991.

Major cancers are associated with lifestyle, and previous studies have found that the non-immigrant populations in the Nordic countries have higher incidence rates of most cancers than the immigrant populations. However, rates are changing worldwide – so these differences may disappear with time. Here we present recent cancer incidence rates among immigrant and non-immigrant men and women in Norway and investigate whether previous differences still exist. We took advantage of a recent change in the Norwegian Cancer Registry regulations that allow for the registry to have information on country of birth. The number of person years for 2014–2018 was aggregated for every combination of sex, five-year age-group and country of birth, by summing up each year’s population in these groups. The number of cancer cases was then counted for the same groups, and age-standardised incidence rates calculated by weighing the age-specific incidence rates by the Nordic and World standard populations. Further, we calculated incidence rate ratios using the non-immigrant population as a reference. Immigrants from Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia had lower incidence of total cancer compared to the non-immigrant population in Norway and immigrants born in the other Nordic or high-income countries. However, some cancers were more common in certain immigrant groups. Asian men and women had threefold the incidence of liver cancer than non-immigrant men and women. Men from the other Nordic countries and from Eastern Europe had higher lung cancer rates than non-immigrant men. National registries should continuously monitor and present cancer incidence stratified on important population subgroups such as country of birth. This can help assess population subgroup specific needs for cancer prevention and treatment, and could eventually help reduce the morbidity and mortality of cancer.

Lung cancer is the deadliest cancer worldwide, accounting for 1.82 million deaths in 2022. The second most deadly form of cancer is colorectum cancer, followed by liver cancer. However, lung cancer is only the sixth leading cause of death worldwide, with heart disease and stroke accounting for the highest share of deaths. Male vs. female cases Given that lung cancer causes the highest number of cancer deaths worldwide, it may be unsurprising to learn that lung cancer is the most common form of new cancer cases among males. However, among females, breast cancer is by far the most common form of new cancer cases. In fact, breast cancer is the most prevalent cancer worldwide, followed by prostate cancer. Prostate cancer is a very close second to lung cancer among the cancers with the highest rates of new cases among men. Male vs. female deaths Lung cancer is by far the deadliest form of cancer among males but is the second deadliest form of cancer among females. Breast cancer, the most prevalent form of cancer among females worldwide, is also the deadliest form of cancer among females. Although prostate cancer is the second most prevalent cancer among men, it is the fifth deadliest cancer. Lung, liver, stomach, colorectum, and oesophagus cancers all have higher deaths rates among males.

BackgroundBetter information on lung cancer occurrence in lifelong nonsmokers is needed to understand gender and racial disparities and to examine how factors other than active smoking influence risk in different time periods and geographic regions. Methods and FindingsWe pooled information on lung cancer incidence and/or death rates among self-reported never-smokers from 13 large cohort studies, representing over 630,000 and 1.8 million persons for incidence and mortality, respectively. We also abstracted population-based data for women from 22 cancer registries and ten countries in time periods and geographic regions where few women smoked. Our main findings were: (1) Men had higher death rates from lung cancer than women in all age and racial groups studied; (2) male and female incidence rates were similar when standardized across all ages 40+ y, albeit with some variation by age; (3) African Americans and Asians living in Korea and Japan (but not in the US) had higher death rates from lung cancer than individuals of European descent; (4) no temporal trends were seen when comparing incidence and death rates among US women age 40–69 y during the 1930s to contemporary populations where few women smoke, or in temporal comparisons of never-smokers in two large American Cancer Society cohorts from 1959 to 2004; and (5) lung cancer incidence rates were higher and more variable among women in East Asia than in other geographic areas with low female smoking. ConclusionsThese comprehensive analyses support claims that the death rate from lung cancer among never-smokers is higher in men than in women, and in African Americans and Asians residing in Asia than in individuals of European descent, but contradict assertions that risk is increasing or that women have a higher incidence rate than men. Further research is needed on the high and variable lung cancer rates among women in Pacific Rim countries.

Data License

The data is signed off as non-disclosive and is released under an Open Government Licence. link

This work uses data that has been provided by patients and collected by the NHS as part of their care and support. The data are collated, maintained and quality assured by the National Disease Registration Service, which is part of NHS England.

Recommended Reading

A previous project of mine on Kaggle; The benefits of early diagnosis are manifold. As documented in the project, diagnosing cancer in its nascent stages significantly bolsters survival rates, elevates the experience and quality of care received by patients, enhances the overall quality of life, and importantly, drives down both the costs and intricacies associated with cancer treatments. Such benefits underscore the profound importance of prompt diagnosis and also cast a light on the tangible repercussions of delays in such processes.

Cancer is a serious business ! Can technology be leveraged to help an early diagnosis ? link

Introduction

Cancer remains one of the most critical health challenges worldwide, impacting millions and posing substantial burdens on healthcare systems. Early diagnosis is a key factor in improving cancer outcomes, as it allows for timely intervention, often leading to better survival rates and improved quality of life for patients. This project uses data collected by the NHS, managed by the National Disease Registration Service under the Open Government License, to explore patterns in cancer incidence, diagnostic pathways, and survival rates across various cancer types. Through data visualisation and statistical analysis, this work seeks to deepen our understanding of the factors influencing early diagnosis, the effectiveness of different diagnostic routes, and the progression of survival rates over time

Data Visualisation: GDO_data_wide.csv

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2Ff9bcb5f75b110bd770d7949f3ceb4066%2FScreenshot%202024-11-13%2012.06.35.png?generation=1731509262231316&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2Fc54f785b479d175ca501a9d8b366c16e%2FScreenshot%202024-11-13%2011.40.59.png?generation=1731509300707188&alt=media" alt="">

The above chart displays the average percentages of different cancer presentation methods across various cancer sites.

Key observations about the chart: - Emergency Presentation (Red): This is a common presentation method for many cancers, especially pancreatic and brain cancers. This likely reflects the difficulty in detecting these cancers early. - GP Referral (Orange): A significant proportion of cancers are diagnosed via GP referral, highlighting the importance of primary care in cancer detection. This is particularly noticeable for skin cancer. - Two-Week Wait (Green): This is most prominent for suspected testicular, prostate, head and neck cancers. - Screening (Blue): Plays a crucial role in detecting specific cancers, notably breast and cervical cancers, where established screening programs exist. However, the impact is small. - Other Outpatient (Purple): This is prominent for eye cancer and varies across other cancer types, likely encompassing a range of planned diagnostic procedures and follow-up appointments.

By combining the information from the chart, we can gain a clearer understanding of how different cancers are typically diagnosed. This information can be valuable for raising awareness, promoting early detection, and improving cancer care.

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2F86fec6be22f5c41e884d51d89a9a1acb%2FScreenshot%202024-11-13%2012.10.47.png?generation=1731513024807463&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2F3c3fcf7abefcec3b21f5347cba37b3d5%2FScreenshot%202024-11-13%2012.09.58.png?generation=1731513057381485&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2Fc589ab6f5ed746b15e29ea205db72435%2FScreenshot%202024-11-13%2012.12.13.png?generation=1731513356398140&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2Fb50b4e97250cb9116fb294bd4f0f1350%2FScreenshot%202024-11-13%2012.11.29.png?generation=1731513259601679&alt=media" alt="">

https://www.googleapis.com/download/storage/v1/b/kaggle-user-content/o/inbox%2F13231939%2F058d1b551b886962bb42cc8dd9619b84%2FScreenshot%202024-11-14%2008.58.06.png?generation=1731574947469345&alt=media" alt="">

The cleaned summary tabl...

This publication reports on newly diagnosed cancers registered in England during 2022. It includes this summary report showing key findings, spreadsheet tables with more detailed estimates, and a methodology document. Cancer registration estimates are provided for: • Incidence of cancer using groupings that incorporate both the location and type of cancer by combinations of gender, age, deprivation, and stage at diagnosis (where appropriate) for England, former Government office regions, Cancer alliances and Integrated care boards • Incidence and mortality (using ICD-10 3-digit codes) by gender and age group for England, former Government office regions, Cancer alliances and Integrated care boards This publication will report on 2022 cancer registrations only, trends will not be reported as the required re-stated populations for 2012 to 2020 are not expected to be published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) until Winter 2024.

According to Cognitive Market Research, the global Cancer Diagnosis market size was USD 109614.5 million in 2024. It will expand at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.50% from 2024 to 2031.

North America held the major market share for more than 40% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 43845.80 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.7% from 2024 to 2031.
Europe accounted for a market share of over 30% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 32884.35 million.
Asia Pacific held a market share of around 23% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 25211.34 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 8.5% from 2024 to 2031.
Latin America had a market share of more than 5% of the global revenue with a market size of USD 5480.73 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.9% from 2024 to 2031.
Middle East and Africa had a market share of around 2% of the global revenue and was estimated at a market size of USD 2192.29 million in 2024 and will grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% from 2024 to 2031.
The consumables category is the fastest growing segment of the Cancer Diagnosis industry

Market Dynamics of Cancer Diagnosis Market

Key Drivers for Cancer Diagnosis Market

Increasing Rate of Cancer Diagnostics to Boost Market Growth

The rising global incidence of cancer, which affects millions of people a year, is a primary driver of the need for diagnostic testing. Numerous factors contribute to this tendency, such as the aging population, which increases the risk of developing some cancers in older adults. Changes in lifestyle, including poor eating habits, inactivity, and increased use of alcohol and tobacco, have also contributed to an increase in cancer incidence. Environmental factors, such as exposure to chemicals and hazardous compounds, exacerbate the problem and increase the risk of developing cancer. Therefore, as early detection and diagnosis are becoming more and more important to patients and healthcare professionals, effective cancer diagnostics are essential. The market for cancer diagnostics is expanding as a result of the increased emphasis on prompt and precise cancer detection, which highlights the value of novel diagnostic procedures. For Instance, in 2023, the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO) projects that there will be 20 million new cases and 10 million deaths, and by 2040, nearly 30 million cases will be reported annually.

Innovations in Diagnostic Technologies to Drive Market Growth

The market for cancer diagnostics is expanding as a result of advancements in diagnostic technologies that have greatly improved the precision and effectiveness of cancer detection. For example, non-invasive cancer biomarker identification in physiological fluids is made possible by liquid biopsies, which offer vital insights into tumor dynamics and therapy response. In a similar vein, molecular diagnostics has transformed the detection of particular genetic abnormalities and changes linked to different types of cancer, allowing for more individualized treatment strategies. High-resolution images of tumors are provided by advanced imaging methods like MRI and PET scans, which help with accurate staging and localization. Better patient outcomes result from these technical developments because they increase overall diagnosis accuracy and enable early intervention. The ongoing development of these cutting-edge diagnostic instruments is propelling market expansion and revolutionizing cancer treatment.

Restraint Factor for the Cancer Diagnosis Market

The High Price of Cutting-Edge Diagnostic Technology Will Limit Market Growth

The market for cancer diagnostics is severely hampered by the high price of sophisticated diagnostic tools. Advanced diagnostic instruments, such as molecular tests and imaging technologies, are frequently expensive, which limits healthcare facilities' access to them, especially in settings with limited resources. These institutions' capacity to provide thorough cancer screening and diagnostic services is restricted by this financial barrier, which eventually affects patient outcomes. These financial difficulties are further exacerbated by the costs associated with the development, research, and regulatory approval of new diagnostic instruments. Companies have to spend a lot of money to comply with...

BackgroundDespite being the second leading cause of death in the United States, cancer disproportionately affects underserved communities due to multiple social factors like economic instability and limited healthcare access, leading to worse survival outcomes. This cross-sectional database study involves real-world data to explore the relationship between the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a measure of community resilience to disasters, and disparities in screening, incidence, and mortality rates of breast, colorectal, and lung cancer. The SVI encompasses four themes: socioeconomic status, household composition & disability, minority status & language, and housing type & transportation.Materials and methodsUsing county-level data, this study compared cancer metrics in U.S. counties and the impact of high and low SVI. Two-sided statistical analysis was performed to compare SVI tertiles and cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates. The outcomes were analyzed with logistic regression to determine the odds ratio of SVI counties having cancer metrics at or above the median.ResultsOur study encompassed 3,132 United States counties. From publicly available SVI data, we demonstrated that high SVI scores correlate with low breast and colorectal cancer screening rates, along with high incidence and mortality rates for all three types of cancers. County level SVI has impact on incidence rates of cancers; breast cancer rates were lowest in high SVI counties, while colorectal and lung cancer rates were highest in the same counties. Age-adjusted mortality rates for all three cancers increased across SVI tertiles. After risk adjustment, a 10-point SVI increase correlated with lower screening and higher mortality rates.ConclusionIn conclusion, our study establishes a significant correlation between SVI and cancer metrics, highlighting the potential to identify marginalized communities with health disparities for targeted healthcare initiatives. It underscores the need for further longitudinal studies on bridging the gap in overall cancer care in the United States.