92 datasets found
  1. Censuses in Wuerttemberg, 1834 to 1925

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • search.gesis.org
    • +1more
    Updated Oct 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Zimmermann, Wolfgang; Däumling, Gabriele; Grosse, Julia; Prangen, Melanie; Jautz, Andrea; Koch-Richter, Regina; Hierath, Claudia; Heizmann, Bodo; Lenz, Florian (2024). Censuses in Wuerttemberg, 1834 to 1925 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.14072
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    State Archive Baden-Württemberghttps://www.landesarchiv-bw.de/
    State Statistical Office Baden-Württemberg
    Authors
    Zimmermann, Wolfgang; Däumling, Gabriele; Grosse, Julia; Prangen, Melanie; Jautz, Andrea; Koch-Richter, Regina; Hierath, Claudia; Heizmann, Bodo; Lenz, Florian
    Time period covered
    1834 - 1925
    Area covered
    Baden-Württemberg
    Description

    By joining the German Zollverein (Customs Union) in 1834, the Kingdom of Württemberg committed itself to conduct a census in a fixed three-year rhythm according to uniform criteria and with a recording scheme that was as precise as possible. The data obtained in the process formed the basis for the distribution of the common revenues of the German Customs Union. The Kingdom of Wurttemberg conducted the first census as part of the Zollverein on 15 December 1834. The basis of the censuses was the ´resident´ population, which according to the contemporary definition included all people who were present in the place on the reference date. Residents who were currently absent due to a journey were also taken into account. Men and women who were in transit in the census municipality were not included. Until 1858, the ´local´ population, i.e. the population living permanently in the village, was also counted.

    The data material of the Zollverein and Reich statistics was collected on the basis of the Oberamtslisten, which have survived in handwritten form (Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg, Staatsarchiv Ludwigsburg, Bestand E 258 VIII). The data is available at the municipal, Oberamts and district level. The figures reflect the territorial status valid at the time of the census as well as the contemporary administrative division. Four Excel tables are available for each census, in which the data for the municipalities and head offices of a district are summarised.

    A crossed-out place name indicates that the municipality in question belonged to another Oberamt at the time of the census. Municipalities that were newly assigned to a Oberamt between 1834 and 1925 are usually added at the end of the Oberamt list. Information on the change of office affiliation can be found in the comment field. An asterisk after a place name (name of the city or village) indicates such supplementary information. The comment field opens as soon as the cursor is placed on the field of the place (city or village) concerned.

    The primary researchers supplemented the data material with historical maps. The maps of the four Württemberg districts are taken from the publication: ´Das Königreich Württemberg´ (The Kingdom of Württemberg), which was published by the State Statistical Office in four volumes between 1904 and 1907.´

    Explanation of symbols

    0 = Less than half of 1 in the last filled position, but more than nothing - = Nothing present (exactly zero) . = Numerical value unknown or to be kept secret x = Table compartment locked because statement does not make sense ... = Statement to be made later / = No statement, as the numerical value is not certain enough () = Statement value limited, as the numerical value may contain errors

    Discrepancies in the totals can be explained by rounding the numbers.

    Place names that have been crossed out indicate that the municipality in question belonged to a different Oberamt at the time of the census.

    • An asterisk after a place name indicates information about the records in the comment field.´

    Publication:

    CD-ROM: »Königreich Württemberg« Volkszählungen 1834 bis 1925. Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg.

    Zu bestellen unter: https://www.statistik-bw.de/Service/Veroeff/Statistische_Daten/900208001.bs E-Mail: vertrieb@stala.bwl.de

  2. d

    County Boundaries for Selected Items from the Census of Agriculture,...

    • search.dataone.org
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Apr 13, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Andrew LaMotte (2017). County Boundaries for Selected Items from the Census of Agriculture, 1950-2012 (COA_STCOFIPS) [Dataset]. https://search.dataone.org/view/2e3a36b6-e86b-40a9-9020-76d19bab18fa
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 13, 2017
    Dataset provided by
    USGS Science Data Catalog
    Authors
    Andrew LaMotte
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2000 - Dec 31, 2000
    Area covered
    Variables measured
    GRIDCODE, STCOFIPS
    Description

    This polygon shapefile provides county or county-equivalent boundaries for the conterminous United States and was created specifically for use with the data tables published as Selected Items from the Census of Agriculture for the Conterminous United States, 1950-2012 (LaMotte, 2015). This data layer is a modified version of Historic Counties for the 2000 Census of Population and Housing produced by the National Historical Geographic Information System (NHGIS) project, which is identical to the U.S. Census Bureau TIGER/Line Census 2000 file, with the exception of added shorelines. Excluded from the CAO_STCOFIPS boundary layer are Broomfield County, Colorado, Menominee County, Wisconsin, and the independent cities of Virginia with the exception of the 3 county-equivalent cities of Chesapeake City, Suffolk, and Virginia Beach. The census of agriculture was not taken in the District of Columbia for 1959, but available data indicate few if any farms in that area, the polygon was left in place to preserve the areas of the surrounding counties. Baltimore City, Maryland was combined with Baltimore County and the St. Louis City, Missouri, was combined with St. Louis County. La Paz County, Arizona was combined with Yuma County, Arizona and Cibola County, New Mexico was combined with Valencia County, New Mexico. Minor county border changes were at a level of precision beyond the scope of the data collection. A major objective of the census data tabulation is to maintain a reasonable degree of comparability of agricultural data from census to census. The tabular data collection is from 14 different censuses where definitions and data collection techniques may change over time and while the data are mostly comparable, a degree of caution should be exercised when using the data in analysis procedures. While the data are at a county-level resolution, a regional approach is more appropriate than a county-by-county analysis. The main purpose of this layer is to provide a base to generate a county raster for the allocation of agricultural census values to specific (agricultural) pixels. Vector format is provided so the raster pixel size can be user designated. References cited: LaMotte, A.E., 2015, Selected items from the Census of Agriculture at the county level for the conterminous United States, 1950-2012: U.S. Geological Survey data release, http://dx.doi.org/10.5066/F7H13016. National Historical Geographic Information System, Minnesota Population Center, 2004, Historic counties for the 2000 census of population and housing: Minneapolis, MN, University of Minnesota, accessed 03/18/2013 at http://nhgis.org

  3. c

    Data from: Integrated Census Microdata (I-CeM), 1851-1911

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk
    Updated Apr 11, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Schurer, K., University of Essex; Higgs, E., University of Essex; FINDMYPAST LIMITED (2025). Integrated Census Microdata (I-CeM), 1851-1911 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7481-3
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Department of History
    Authors
    Schurer, K., University of Essex; Higgs, E., University of Essex; FINDMYPAST LIMITED
    Time period covered
    Mar 31, 2009 - Jun 12, 2024
    Area covered
    Isle of Man, Channel Islands, England and Wales, Scotland
    Variables measured
    Individuals, Families/households, National
    Measurement technique
    Transcription
    Description

    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.


    The Integrated Census Microdata (I-CeM) project has produced a standardised, integrated dataset of most of the censuses of Great Britain for the period 1851 to 1921: England and Wales for 1851-1861, 1881-1921 and Scotland for 1851-1901 and 1921, making available to academic researchers, detailed information at parish level about everyone resident in Great Britain collected at most of the decennial censuses between 1851-1921. Users should note that the 1871 England and Wales census data and 1911 Scottish census data are not available via I-CeM.

    The original digital data has been coded and standardised. In addition, the original text and numerical strings have always been preserved in separate variables, so that researchers can go back to the original transcription. However, users should note that name and address details for individuals are not currently included in the database; for reasons of commercial sensitivity, these are held under Special Licence access conditions under SN 7856 for data relating to England, Wales and Scotland, 1851-1911 and SN 9281 for data relating to England and Wales, 1921.

    This study (7481) relates to the available anonymised data for 1851-1911, i.e. all available years except 1921. Data for England and Wales 1921 are available under SN 9280. The data are available via an online system at https://icem.ukdataservice.ac.uk/

    Latest edition information

    For the second edition (June 2024), the 1851-1911 data have been redeposited with amended and enhanced data values.

    Further information about I-CeM can be found on the I-CeM Integrated Microdata Project webpages.


    Main Topics:

    Details are available for each individual on place of enumeration, household and familial structure, age, gender, marital status, occupation, employment status, birthplace, disability, language spoken (in Wales and Scotland).

  4. Population of the United States 1610-2020

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Population of the United States 1610-2020 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1067138/population-united-states-historical/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In the past four centuries, the population of the United States has grown from a recorded 350 people around the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1610, to an estimated 331 million people in 2020. The pre-colonization populations of the indigenous peoples of the Americas have proven difficult for historians to estimate, as their numbers decreased rapidly following the introduction of European diseases (namely smallpox, plague and influenza). Native Americans were also omitted from most censuses conducted before the twentieth century, therefore the actual population of what we now know as the United States would have been much higher than the official census data from before 1800, but it is unclear by how much. Population growth in the colonies throughout the eighteenth century has primarily been attributed to migration from the British Isles and the Transatlantic slave trade; however it is also difficult to assert the ethnic-makeup of the population in these years as accurate migration records were not kept until after the 1820s, at which point the importation of slaves had also been illegalized. Nineteenth century In the year 1800, it is estimated that the population across the present-day United States was around six million people, with the population in the 16 admitted states numbering at 5.3 million. Migration to the United States began to happen on a large scale in the mid-nineteenth century, with the first major waves coming from Ireland, Britain and Germany. In some aspects, this wave of mass migration balanced out the demographic impacts of the American Civil War, which was the deadliest war in U.S. history with approximately 620 thousand fatalities between 1861 and 1865. The civil war also resulted in the emancipation of around four million slaves across the south; many of whose ancestors would take part in the Great Northern Migration in the early 1900s, which saw around six million black Americans migrate away from the south in one of the largest demographic shifts in U.S. history. By the end of the nineteenth century, improvements in transport technology and increasing economic opportunities saw migration to the United States increase further, particularly from southern and Eastern Europe, and in the first decade of the 1900s the number of migrants to the U.S. exceeded one million people in some years. Twentieth and twenty-first century The U.S. population has grown steadily throughout the past 120 years, reaching one hundred million in the 1910s, two hundred million in the 1960s, and three hundred million in 2007. In the past century, the U.S. established itself as a global superpower, with the world's largest economy (by nominal GDP) and most powerful military. Involvement in foreign wars has resulted in over 620,000 further U.S. fatalities since the Civil War, and migration fell drastically during the World Wars and Great Depression; however the population continuously grew in these years as the total fertility rate remained above two births per woman, and life expectancy increased (except during the Spanish Flu pandemic of 1918).

    Since the Second World War, Latin America has replaced Europe as the most common point of origin for migrants, with Hispanic populations growing rapidly across the south and border states. Because of this, the proportion of non-Hispanic whites, which has been the most dominant ethnicity in the U.S. since records began, has dropped more rapidly in recent decades. Ethnic minorities also have a much higher birth rate than non-Hispanic whites, further contributing to this decline, and the share of non-Hispanic whites is expected to fall below fifty percent of the U.S. population by the mid-2000s. In 2020, the United States has the third-largest population in the world (after China and India), and the population is expected to reach four hundred million in the 2050s.

  5. o

    Deep Roots of Racial Inequalities in US Healthcare: The 1906 American...

    • portal.sds.ox.ac.uk
    txt
    Updated Dec 5, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Benjamin Chrisinger (2023). Deep Roots of Racial Inequalities in US Healthcare: The 1906 American Medical Directory [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.25446/oxford.24065709.v2
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 5, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    University of Oxford
    Authors
    Benjamin Chrisinger
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset comprises physician-level entries from the 1906 American Medical Directory, the first in a series of semi-annual directories of all practicing physicians published by the American Medical Association [1]. Physicians are consistently listed by city, county, and state. Most records also include details about the place and date of medical training. From 1906-1940, Directories also identified the race of black physicians [2].This dataset comprises physician entries for a subset of US states and the District of Columbia, including all of the South and several adjacent states (Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia). Records were extracted via manual double-entry by professional data management company [3], and place names were matched to latitude/longitude coordinates. The main source for geolocating physician entries was the US Census. Historical Census records were sourced from IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System [4]. Additionally, a public database of historical US Post Office locations was used to match locations that could not be found using Census records [5]. Fuzzy matching algorithms were also used to match misspelled place or county names [6].The source of geocoding match is described in the “match.source” field (Type of spatial match (census_YEAR = match to NHGIS census place-county-state for given year; census_fuzzy_YEAR = matched to NHGIS place-county-state with fuzzy matching algorithm; dc = matched to centroid for Washington, DC; post_places = place-county-state matched to Blevins & Helbock's post office dataset; post_fuzzy = matched to post office dataset with fuzzy matching algorithm; post_simp = place/state matched to post office dataset; post_confimed_missing = post office dataset confirms place and county, but could not find coordinates; osm = matched using Open Street Map geocoder; hand-match = matched by research assistants reviewing web archival sources; unmatched/hand_match_missing = place coordinates could not be found). For records where place names could not be matched, but county names could, coordinates for county centroids were used. Overall, 40,964 records were matched to places (match.type=place_point) and 931 to county centroids ( match.type=county_centroid); 76 records could not be matched (match.type=NA).Most records include information about the physician’s medical training, including the year of graduation and a code linking to a school. A key to these codes is given on Directory pages 26-27, and at the beginning of each state’s section [1]. The OSM geocoder was used to assign coordinates to each school by its listed location. Straight-line distances between physicians’ place of training and practice were calculated using the sf package in R [7], and are given in the “school.dist.km” field. Additionally, the Directory identified a handful of schools that were “fraudulent” (school.fraudulent=1), and institutions set up to train black physicians (school.black=1).AMA identified black physicians in the directory with the signifier “(col.)” following the physician’s name (race.black=1). Additionally, a number of physicians attended schools identified by AMA as serving black students, but were not otherwise identified as black; thus an expanded racial identifier was generated to identify black physicians (race.black.prob=1), including physicians who attended these schools and those directly identified (race.black=1).Approximately 10% of dataset entries were audited by trained research assistants, in addition to 100% of black physician entries. These audits demonstrated a high degree of accuracy between the original Directory and extracted records. Still, given the complexity of matching across multiple archival sources, it is possible that some errors remain; any identified errors will be periodically rectified in the dataset, with a log kept of these updates.For further information about this dataset, or to report errors, please contact Dr Ben Chrisinger (Benjamin.Chrisinger@tufts.edu). Future updates to this dataset, including additional states and Directory years, will be posted here: https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataverse/amd.References:1. American Medical Association, 1906. American Medical Directory. American Medical Association, Chicago. Retrieved from: https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000543547.2. Baker, Robert B., Harriet A. Washington, Ololade Olakanmi, Todd L. Savitt, Elizabeth A. Jacobs, Eddie Hoover, and Matthew K. Wynia. "African American physicians and organized medicine, 1846-1968: origins of a racial divide." JAMA 300, no. 3 (2008): 306-313. doi:10.1001/jama.300.3.306.3. GABS Research Consult Limited Company, https://www.gabsrcl.com.4. Steven Manson, Jonathan Schroeder, David Van Riper, Tracy Kugler, and Steven Ruggles. IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 17.0 [GNIS, TIGER/Line & Census Maps for US Places and Counties: 1900, 1910, 1920, 1930, 1940, 1950; 1910_cPHA: ds37]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. 2022. http://doi.org/10.18128/D050.V17.05. Blevins, Cameron; Helbock, Richard W., 2021, "US Post Offices", https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NUKCNA, Harvard Dataverse, V1, UNF:6:8ROmiI5/4qA8jHrt62PpyA== [fileUNF]6. fedmatch: Fast, Flexible, and User-Friendly Record Linkage Methods. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/fedmatch/index.html7. sf: Simple Features for R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sf/index.html

  6. r

    NRS-1282 | 1841 Census: Abstracts of Returns

    • researchdata.edu.au
    Updated Nov 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AGY-16 | Colonial Secretary and Registrar of the Records of New South Wales (1821-1824) Colonial Secretary (1824-1856) Colonial Secretary or Principal Secretary to the Government (1856-1859) Chief Secretary [I]; AGY-16 | Colonial Secretary and Registrar of the Records of New South Wales (1821-1824) Colonial Secretary (1824-1856) Colonial Secretary or Principal Secretary to the Government (1856-1859) Chief Secretary [I]; AGY-10 | Premier's Office [II] (1988) / Premier's Department [II] (1988-2007) / Department of Premier and Cabinet (2007-2023) / Premier's Department [III] (2023- ) (2024). NRS-1282 | 1841 Census: Abstracts of Returns [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/1841-census-abstracts-returns/168639
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 8, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    NSW State Archives Collection
    Premier's Office [II] (1988) / Premier's Department [II] (1988-2007) / Department of Premier and Cabinet (2007-2023) / Premier's Department [III] (2023- )
    Authors
    AGY-16 | Colonial Secretary and Registrar of the Records of New South Wales (1821-1824) Colonial Secretary (1824-1856) Colonial Secretary or Principal Secretary to the Government (1856-1859) Chief Secretary [I]; AGY-16 | Colonial Secretary and Registrar of the Records of New South Wales (1821-1824) Colonial Secretary (1824-1856) Colonial Secretary or Principal Secretary to the Government (1856-1859) Chief Secretary [I]; AGY-10 | Premier's Office [II] (1988) / Premier's Department [II] (1988-2007) / Department of Premier and Cabinet (2007-2023) / Premier's Department [III] (2023- )
    Time period covered
    Mar 2, 1841 - Dec 31, 1841
    Description

    An Act for ascertaining the Number of the Inhabitants of the Colony of New South Wales in the Year One thousand eight hundred and forty-one, 1840 (4 Victoria Act No. 26) required every householder, employer of servants and proprietor and occupier of land to complete the census schedule on the second day ('or on the days immediately subsequent thereto') of March 1841.

    The 1841 Census was more complete than its predecessors, as the population was recorded in police districts, counties and towns. There was a broader tabulation of results which included age groups, conjugal condition (married or unmarried), religious denomination and civil condition. Civil condition provided statistical information on the number of bond (convict) or free males and females in a household, whether they were born in the colony, arrived free, held a ticket of leave, and whether they were in government employment or private assignment.

    The Census was taken by specially appointed collectors generally responsible to a Commissioner or a Bench of Magistrates, the collector completed printed forms, known as Form ‘A’ for each household in the allotted territory. After the Census magistrates were instructed to check the returns and send abstracts to the Colonial Secretary, designated Form ‘C’. The returns were then gathered together, statistics extracted and the final returns made.

    This series comprises bound volumes of Form C . (NRS 1281).

    The Form C records: number of return, name of establishment (usually head of household), number of each age group for males, and then for females (the age divisions are under two, two and under seven, seven and under 14, 14 and under 21, 21 and under 45, 45 and under 60, 60 and upwards); married or single; civil condition: free (born in colony, arrived free, other free persons), bond (ticket of leave, in government employment, in private assignment); then religion divided into Church of England, Church of Scotland, Wesleyan Methodists, other Protestant dissenters, Roman Catholics, Jews, Mohammedans and Pagans; occupation divided into land proprietors, merchants, bankers, and professional men; shopkeepers and other retail dealers; mechanics and artificers; shepherds and others in the care of sheep; gardeners, stockmen and persons employed in agriculture; domestic servants; all other persons not included in the foregoing classes; totals for males, for females, and for both; houses - further divided into stone or brick, wood, total; finished or unfinished; inhabited or uninhabited. The columns are totalled at the bottom of each sheet.

    As well as these Abstracts of returns, there are also a number of "condensed" abstracts of returns, filled in on Form C. These enumerate the running numbers covered by each sheet of abstracts eg. one-20, 21-40 and give sums for each group as well as grand total.

    Form C abstracts are arranged by district following the order in the Returns of the Colony for 1841. 'Condensed' Abstracts are filed with the district abstracts to which they pertain.

    Berrima-Port Phillip (X946-49)
    Queanbeyan-Yass (X950-51)

    References
    1) State Records New South Wales Website, "Concise Guide to the State Archives (Ca - Commissioners): Colonial Secretary, later Chief Secretary, later Services; s. Population and Statistics, a. Musters and Census Records, ii. Census,23. 1841 Census: Abstracts of returns, CGS 1282."
    2) State Records New South Wales Website, "Introduction to the 1841 Census: Index to the 1841 Census, Background".
    3) State Records New South Wales Website, "Short Guide 12 - Muster and Census Records, 1788 - 1901".

  7. c

    Great Britain Historical Database: Census Data: Marital Status Statistics,...

    • datacatalogue.cessda.eu
    • beta.ukdataservice.ac.uk
    Updated Nov 28, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Southall, H. R., University of Portsmouth, School of the Environment (2024). Great Britain Historical Database: Census Data: Marital Status Statistics, 1931 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-4557-2
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 28, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Geography and Geosciences
    Authors
    Southall, H. R., University of Portsmouth, School of the Environment
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1999 - Jan 1, 2002
    Area covered
    United Kingdom, Great Britain, Scotland
    Variables measured
    Individuals, Families/households, National, Subnational
    Measurement technique
    Transcription, Compilation/Synthesis
    Description

    Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

    The Great Britain Historical Database has been assembled as part of the ongoing Great Britain Historical GIS Project. The project aims to trace the emergence of the north-south divide in Britain and to provide a synoptic view of the human geography of Britain at sub-county scales. Further information about the project is available on A Vision of Britain webpages, where users can browse the database's documentation system online.


    The British census reports generally cross-tabulated age against marital status as well as gender, but the transcriptions in the Great Britain Historical Database are generally limited to age and gender, enabling the construction of population pyramids. This dataset is a quite separate transcription limited to marital status, or "conjugal condition", and gender, held only for Scotland in 1931.

    Latest edition information

    For the second edition (August 2022), the data and documentation files were replaced with updated versions.


    Main Topics:

    Conjugal Condition at county and burgh level for Scotland in 1931.

    Please note: this study does not include information on named individuals and would therefore not be useful for personal family history research.

  8. United States No of Housing Unit: Vacant: Year Round: Held Off Market

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Mar 31, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2018). United States No of Housing Unit: Vacant: Year Round: Held Off Market [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/united-states/number-of-housing-units/no-of-housing-unit-vacant-year-round-held-off-market
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 31, 2018
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jun 1, 2015 - Mar 1, 2018
    Area covered
    United States
    Variables measured
    Stock
    Description

    United States Number of Housing Unit: Vacant: Year Round: Held Off Market data was reported at 7,467.000 Unit th in Sep 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 7,548.000 Unit th for Jun 2018. United States Number of Housing Unit: Vacant: Year Round: Held Off Market data is updated quarterly, averaging 4,691.000 Unit th from Mar 1965 (Median) to Sep 2018, with 215 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 7,700.000 Unit th in Jun 2014 and a record low of 1,764.000 Unit th in Jun 1965. United States Number of Housing Unit: Vacant: Year Round: Held Off Market data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by US Census Bureau. The data is categorized under Global Database’s United States – Table US.EB011: Number of Housing Units. Series Remarks Data for 1979 Q1 to Q4 was revised to reflect changes made in 1980. Data for 1989 Q1 to Q4 was revised to include year-round vacant mobile homes. Data for 1993 Q1 to Q4 was revised based on the 1990 Census. Data for 2002 Q1 to Q4 was revised based on the 2000 Census.

  9. d

    Voter Registration by Census Tract

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.kingcounty.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Sep 23, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.kingcounty.gov (2021). Voter Registration by Census Tract [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/voter-registration-by-census-tract
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 23, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    data.kingcounty.gov
    Description

    This web map displays data from the voter registration database as the percent of registered voters by census tract in King County, Washington. The data for this web map is compiled from King County Elections voter registration data for the years 2013-2019. The total number of registered voters is based on the geo-location of the voter's registered address at the time of the general election for each year. The eligible voting population, age 18 and over, is based on the estimated population increase from the US Census Bureau and the Washington Office of Financial Management and was calculated as a projected 6 percent population increase for the years 2010-2013, 7 percent population increase for the years 2010-2014, 9 percent population increase for the years 2010-2015, 11 percent population increase for the years 2010-2016 & 2017, 14 percent population increase for the years 2010-2018 and 17 percent population increase for the years 2010-2019. The total population 18 and over in 2010 was 1,517,747 in King County, Washington. The percentage of registered voters represents the number of people who are registered to vote as compared to the eligible voting population, age 18 and over. The voter registration data by census tract was grouped into six percentage range estimates: 50% or below, 51-60%, 61-70%, 71-80%, 81-90% and 91% or above with an overall 84 percent registration rate. In the map the lighter colors represent a relatively low percentage range of voter registration and the darker colors represent a relatively high percentage range of voter registration. PDF maps of these data can be viewed at King County Elections downloadable voter registration maps. The 2019 General Election Voter Turnout layer is voter turnout data by historical precinct boundaries for the corresponding year. The data is grouped into six percentage ranges: 0-30%, 31-40%, 41-50% 51-60%, 61-70%, and 71-100%. The lighter colors represent lower turnout and the darker colors represent higher turnout. The King County Demographics Layer is census data for language, income, poverty, race and ethnicity at the census tract level and is based on the 2010-2014 American Community Survey 5 year Average provided by the United States Census Bureau. Since the data is based on a survey, they are considered to be estimates and should be used with that understanding. The demographic data sets were developed and are maintained by King County Staff to support the King County Equity and Social Justice program. Other data for this map is located in the King County GIS Spatial Data Catalog, where data is managed by the King County GIS Center, a multi-department enterprise GIS in King County, Washington. King County has nearly 1.3 million registered voters and is the largest jurisdiction in the United States to conduct all elections by mail. In the map you can view the percent of registered voters by census tract, compare registration within political districts, compare registration and demographic data, verify your voter registration or register to vote through a link to the VoteWA, Washington State Online Voter Registration web page.

  10. Prediction apportionments and their extent of inequality measured by the...

    • figshare.com
    txt
    Updated Jun 25, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Wenruo Lyu (2023). Prediction apportionments and their extent of inequality measured by the PSI-based and PSP-based indexes for the 2024 election of the European Parliament [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.23359829.v1
    Explore at:
    txtAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 25, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Figsharehttp://figshare.com/
    Authors
    Wenruo Lyu
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    apportionments_pop_2021_pred_2024.xlsx This is a dataset containing prediction apportionments of seats for the 2024 election of the European Parliament (EP). This prediction is based on population data from the 2021 census held by Eurostat. See our paper for the standard function, configurations of parameters, and d-rounding rules we used for calculation. Note: We recommend readers who are not so well informed about apportionment problems and rounding rules see https://www.census.gov/library/video/2021/what-is-apportionment.html or https://www.census.gov/history/www/reference/apportionment/methods_of_apportionment.html.

    Data interpretations for this dataset are as follows. 4 worksheets: all: prediction apportionment results of all configurations under the assumption that the membership remains unchanged and the total number of seats is between 705 (current total number of seats) and 750 (statutory threshold). no_lose: prediction apportionment results under the following assumptions: (1) the membership remains unchanged; (2) any Member State does not lose any seats from the current distribution of seats; (3) and the total number of seats is between 705 and 750. increase_no_lose: prediction apportionment results under the following assumptions: (1) the membership remains unchanged; (2) any Member State with an increasing population does not lose any seats from the current distribution of seats; (3) and the total number of seats is between 705 and 750. response: prediction apportionment results under the following assumptions: (1) the membership remains unchanged; (2) any Member State with an increasing population does not lose any seats from the current distribution of seats while any Member State with a decreasing population does not gain seats; (3) and the total number of seats is between 705 and 750. Meanings of column names: State: name of Member State of the European Union p_2011: population data from the 2011 census (data source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demography/population-housing-censuses/database) p_2021: population data from the 2021 census (data source: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Population_and_housing_census_2021_-_population_grids&stable=1#Distribution_of_European_population) stat_2020: current distribution of seats in the EP (data source: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/headlines/eu-affairs/20180126STO94114/infographic-how-many-seats-does-each-country-get-in-in-the-european-parliament) other columns: composed in the order of "a", "gamma", "d-rounding rule", and "the total number of seats (S)".

    indexes_pop_2021_pred_2024.csv This is a dataset presenting the extent of the PSI-based inequality index (index based on Population Seat Index) and the conventional PSP-based index (index based on the proportion of seats to population) of all prediction apportionments of seats for the 2024 election of the European Parliament (EP). This prediction is based on population data from the 2021 census held by Eurostat. See our paper for the standard function, configurations of parameters, and d-rounding rules used for calculation and the PSI-based index and PSP-based index used for evaluation. Data interpretations for this dataset are as follows. Meanings of column names: a: configuration of the standard function gamma: configuration of the standard function rounding: d-rounding rule used for obtaining a whole number S: the total number of seats in the prediction x_min: the minimum number of seats in the prediction apportionment x_max: the maximum number of seats in the prediction apportionment inequality index: maximum of PSI divided by minimum of PSI psp_max/psp_min: maximum of PSP divided by minimum of PSP

  11. a

    Census 2000 Blocks Atlanta Region

    • opendata.atlantaregional.com
    Updated Oct 30, 2014
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions (2014). Census 2000 Blocks Atlanta Region [Dataset]. https://opendata.atlantaregional.com/datasets/026c8b0f27a74af09875bc25e37d772a
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2014
    Dataset provided by
    The Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    Authors
    Georgia Association of Regional Commissions
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This layer was developed by the Research & Analytics Division of the Atlanta Regional Commission to represent the United States Census Bureau's 2000 Decennial Census data at the block geography.Attributes:FIPSSTCO = The Federal Information Processing Series (FIPS) state and county codes. FIPS codes were formerly known as Federal Information Processing Standards codes, until the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) announced its decision in 2005 to remove geographic entity codes from its oversight. The Census Bureau continues to maintain and issue codes for geographic entities covered under FIPS oversight, albeit with a revised meaning for the FIPS acronym. Geographic entities covered under FIPS include states, counties, congressional districts, core based statistical areas, places, county subdivisions, subminor civil divisions, consolidated cities, and all types of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian areas. FIPS codes are assigned alphabetically according to the name of the geographic entity and may change to maintain alphabetic sort when new entities are created or names change. FIPS codes for specific geographic entity types are usually unique within the next highest level of geographic entity with which a nesting relationship exists. For example, FIPS state, congressional district, and core based statistical area codes are unique within nation; FIPS county, place, county subdivision, and subminor civil division codes are unique within state. The codes for American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian areas also are unique within state; those areas in multiple states will have different codes for each state.TRACT2000 = Census Tract Codes and Numbers. Census tracts are identified by an up to four-digit integer number and may have an optional two-digit suffix; for example 1457.02 or 23. The census tract codes consist of six digits with an implied decimal between the fourth and fifth digit corresponding to the basic census tract number but with leading zeroes and trailing zeroes for census tracts without a suffix. The tract number examples above would have codes of 145702 and 002300, respectively.BLOCK2000= Census Block Numbers are numbered uniquely with a four-digit census block number from 0000 to 9999 within census tract, which nest within state and county. The first digit of the census block number identifies the block group. Block numbers beginning with a zero (in Block Group 0) are only associated with water-only areas.STFID = A concatenation of FIPSSTCO, TRACT2000, and BLOCK2000, which creates the entire FIPS code for this geography.WFD = Workforce Development Area (WFD) is a seven-county area created by agreement of county chief-elected officials, administered by the Atlanta Regional Commission and funded for training and employment activities under the federal Workforce Investment Act (WIA). For more information on ARC’s Workforce Development programs and services please consult www.atlantaregional.com/workforce/workforce.html.RDC_AAA = ARC Area Agency on Aging is a 10-county area funded by the Department of Human Resources and designated by the Older Americans Act to plan for the needs of the rapidly expanding group of older citizens in the Atlanta region. It is part of a statewide network of 12 AAAs and a national network of more than 670 AAAs. For more information on aging services please consult www.agewiseconnection.com.MNGWPD = The Metro North Georgia Water Planning District provides water resource plans, policies and coordination for metropolitan Atlanta. The District has developed regional plans for stormwater management, wastewater treatment and water supply and water conservation. The 15-county Water Planning District includes the ten counties in the ARC plus five additional counties (Bartow, Coweta, Forsyth, Hall, & Paulding). For more information please consult www.northgeorgiawater.org. MPO = The Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is a 19-county area federally-designated for regional transportation planning to meet air quality standards and for programming projects to implement the adopted Regional Transportation Plan (RTP). The MPO planning area boundary includes the 10-county state-designated Regional Commission and nine additional counties (all of Coweta, Forsyth, & Paulding and parts of Barrow, Dawson, Newton, Pike, Spalding and Walton). This boundary takes into consideration both the current urbanized area as well as areas forecast to become urbanized in the next 20 years.MSA = the 29-County “Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA” Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) and the 39-county “Atlanta--Athens-Clarke County--Sandy Springs, GA” Combined Statistical Area (CSA), which includes the 29 counties of the Atlanta MSA along with the Athens-Clarke County and Gainesville MSAs and the micropolitan statistical areas of Calhoun, Cedartown, Jefferson, LaGrange and Thomaston, GA. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) defines CSAs, MSAs and the smaller micropolitan statistical areas nationwide according to published standards applied to U.S. Census Bureau data. These various statistical areas describe substantial core areas of population together with adjacent communities having a high degree of economic and social integration, often illustrated in high rates of commuting from the adjacent areas to job locations in the core. For more information, please consult http://www.census.gov/population/metro/data/metrodef.htmlF1HR_NA = The Federal 1-Hour Air Quality Non-Attainment Area is a fine particulate matter standard (PM2.5). The non-attainment area under this standard includes the 15-county eight-hour ozone nonattainment area plus Barrow, Carroll, Hall, Spalding, Walton, and small parts of Heard and Putnam counties.F8HR_NA: The Federal 8-Hour Air Quality Non-Attainment Area for the 2008 eight-hour ozone standard is 15 counties.ACRES = The number of acres contained within the Block.SQ_MILES = The number of square miles contained within the Block.Source: United States Census Bureau, Atlanta Regional CommissionDate: 2000For additional information, please visit the Atlanta Regional Commission at www.atlantaregional.com

  12. D

    DVRPC 2050 Population & Employment Forecasts, & Zonal Data (County) version...

    • catalog.dvrpc.org
    • staging-catalog.cloud.dvrpc.org
    • +1more
    api, geojson, html +1
    Updated May 23, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DVRPC (2025). DVRPC 2050 Population & Employment Forecasts, & Zonal Data (County) version 2 [Dataset]. https://catalog.dvrpc.org/dataset/dvrpc-2050-population-employment-forecasts-zonal-data-county-version-2
    Explore at:
    geojson, xml, html, apiAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    DVRPC
    Description

    As a part of DVRPC’s long-range planning activities, the Commission is required to maintain forecasts with at least a 20-year horizon. DVRPC has updated forecasts through the horizon year of the 2050 Long-Range Plan. The 2050 Version 2.0 Population and Employment Forecasts (2050 Version 2.0, v2.0) were adopted by the DVRPC Board on October 24, 2024, They update the 2050 v1.0 forecasts with a new county-level age-cohort model and new base data from the 2020 Decennial Census, 2020 Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), and 2021 National Establishments Time Series (NETS). The age-cohort model calculates future population for five year age-sex cohorts using the 2020 Census base population, and anticipated birth, death, and migration rates. These anticipated rates were developed using historic birth and death records from New Jersey and Pennsylvania state health department data, as well as historic net migration data, calculated from decennial census data. Employment forecasts were developed by multiplying population forecasts by a ratio of working age population to jobs, calculated from 2022 ACS and BEA data. The municipal and TAZ forecasts use the growth factors from the v1.0 forecasts, scaled to the new county and regional population totals from the age-cohort model. While the forecast is not adopted at the transportation analysis zone (TAZ) level, it is allocated to these zones for use in DVRPC’s travel demand model, and conforms to municipal/district level adopted totals. This data provides TAZ-level population and employment. Other travel model attributes are available upon request. DVRPC has prepared regional- and county-level population and employment forecasts in five-year increments for years 2020–2050. 2019 land use model results are also available. A forthcoming Analytical Data Report will document the forecasting process and methodologies.

  13. Brazil Foreign Capital Census: Stock: Companies Owned by Non Residents: DIC:...

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Feb 15, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2025). Brazil Foreign Capital Census: Stock: Companies Owned by Non Residents: DIC: From 90% to 99.99% of Voting Power Held by Non Resident Investors [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/brazil/foreign-capital-census-companies-owned-by-nonresidents/foreign-capital-census-stock-companies-owned-by-non-residents-dic-from-90-to-9999-of-voting-power-held-by-non-resident-investors
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 15, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    CEIC Data
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Dec 1, 2010 - Dec 1, 2015
    Area covered
    Brazil
    Variables measured
    Foreign Investment
    Description

    Brazil Foreign Capital Census: Stock: Companies Owned by Non Residents: DIC: From 90% to 99.99% of Voting Power Held by Non Resident Investors data was reported at 82,307,456,443.240 USD in 2015. This records a decrease from the previous number of 126,270,637,606.371 USD for 2010. Brazil Foreign Capital Census: Stock: Companies Owned by Non Residents: DIC: From 90% to 99.99% of Voting Power Held by Non Resident Investors data is updated yearly, averaging 104,289,047,024.805 USD from Dec 2010 (Median) to 2015, with 2 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 126,270,637,606.371 USD in 2010 and a record low of 82,307,456,443.240 USD in 2015. Brazil Foreign Capital Census: Stock: Companies Owned by Non Residents: DIC: From 90% to 99.99% of Voting Power Held by Non Resident Investors data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Central Bank of Brazil. The data is categorized under Brazil Premium Database’s Investment – Table BR.OC002: Foreign Capital Census: Companies Owned by Non-Residents.

  14. F

    Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Apr 23, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 23, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Median Sales Price of Houses Sold for the United States (MSPUS) from Q1 1963 to Q1 2025 about sales, median, housing, and USA.

  15. l

    2022 Population and Poverty at Split Tract

    • data.lacounty.gov
    • egis-lacounty.hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 8, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2024). 2022 Population and Poverty at Split Tract [Dataset]. https://data.lacounty.gov/datasets/2022-population-and-poverty-at-split-tract
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 8, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2020 census tracts split by 2022 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2020 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT20: 2020 Census tractFIP22: 2022 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2022) CSA: Countywide Statistical Area (CSA) - Unincorporated area community names and LA City neighborhood names.CT20FIP22CSA: 2020 census tract with 2022 city FIPs for incorporated cities and unincorporated areas and LA neighborhoods. SPA22: 2022 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD22: 2022 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP22_AGE_0_4: 2022 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP22_AGE_5_9: 2022 population 5 to 9 years old POP22_AGE_10_14: 2022 population 10 to 14 years old POP22_AGE_15_17: 2022 population 15 to 17 years old POP22_AGE_18_19: 2022 population 18 to 19 years old POP22_AGE_20_44: 2022 population 20 to 24 years old POP22_AGE_25_29: 2022 population 25 to 29 years old POP22_AGE_30_34: 2022 population 30 to 34 years old POP22_AGE_35_44: 2022 population 35 to 44 years old POP22_AGE_45_54: 2022 population 45 to 54 years old POP22_AGE_55_64: 2022 population 55 to 64 years old POP22_AGE_65_74: 2022 population 65 to 74 years old POP22_AGE_75_84: 2022 population 75 to 84 years old POP22_AGE_85_100: 2022 population 85 years and older POP22_WHITE: 2022 Non-Hispanic White POP22_BLACK: 2022 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP22_AIAN: 2022 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP22_ASIAN: 2022 Non-Hispanic Asian POP22_HNPI: 2022 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP22_HISPANIC: 2022 HispanicPOP22_MALE: 2022 Male POP22_FEMALE: 2022 Female POV22_WHITE: 2022 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV22_BLACK: 2022 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV22_AIAN: 2022 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV22_ASIAN: 2022 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV22_HNPI: 2022 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV22_HISPANIC: 2022 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV22_TOTAL: 2022 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP22_TOTAL: 2022 Total PopulationAREA_SQMil: Area in square mile.POP22_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV22_PERCENT: Poverty rate/percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2020 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2022. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

  16. l

    2014 Population and Poverty at Split Tract

    • data.lacounty.gov
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +3more
    Updated May 7, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2024). 2014 Population and Poverty at Split Tract [Dataset]. https://data.lacounty.gov/datasets/2014-population-and-poverty-at-split-tract/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2010 census tracts split by 2014 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2010 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT10: 2010 Census tractFIP14: 2014 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2014) CT10FIP14: 2010 census tract with 2014 city FIPs for incorporated cities and unincorporated areas. SPA12: 2012 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD12: 2012 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP14_AGE_0_4: 2014 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP14_AGE_5_9: 2014 population 5 to 9 years old POP14_AGE_10_14: 2014 population 10 to 14 years old POP14_AGE_15_17: 2014 population 15 to 17 years old POP14_AGE_18_19: 2014 population 18 to 19 years old POP14_AGE_20_44: 2014 population 20 to 24 years old POP14_AGE_25_29: 2014 population 25 to 29 years old POP14_AGE_30_34: 2014 population 30 to 34 years old POP14_AGE_35_44: 2014 population 35 to 44 years old POP14_AGE_45_54: 2014 population 45 to 54 years old POP14_AGE_55_64: 2014 population 55 to 64 years old POP14_AGE_65_74: 2014 population 65 to 74 years old POP14_AGE_75_84: 2014 population 75 to 84 years old POP14_AGE_85_100: 2014 population 85 years and older POP14_WHITE: 2014 Non-Hispanic White POP14_BLACK: 2014 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP14_AIAN: 2014 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP14_ASIAN: 2014 Non-Hispanic Asian POP14_HNPI: 2014 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP14_HISPANIC: 2014 HispanicPOP14_MALE: 2014 Male POP14_FEMALE: 2014 Female POV14_WHITE: 2014 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV14_BLACK: 2014 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV14_AIAN: 2014 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV14_ASIAN: 2014 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV14_HNPI: 2014 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV14_HISPANIC: 2014 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV14_TOTAL: 2014 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP14_TOTAL: 2014 Total PopulationAREA_SQMIL: Area in square milePOP14_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV14_PERCENT: Poverty rate/percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2010 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2014. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

  17. a

    2021 Population and Poverty at Split Tract

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +1more
    Updated May 7, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2024). 2021 Population and Poverty at Split Tract [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/maps/lacounty::2021-population-and-poverty-at-split-tract
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2020 census tracts split by 2021 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2020 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT20: 2020 Census tractFIP21: 2021 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2021) CSA: Countywide Statistical Area (CSA) - Unincorporated area community names and LA City neighborhood names.CT20FIP21CSA: 2020 census tract with 2021 city FIPs for incorporated cities, unincorporated areas and LA neighborhoods. SPA22: 2022 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD22: 2022 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP21_AGE_0_4: 2021 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP21_AGE_5_9: 2021 population 5 to 9 years old POP21_AGE_10_14: 2021 population 10 to 14 years old POP21_AGE_15_17: 2021 population 15 to 17 years old POP21_AGE_18_19: 2021 population 18 to 19 years old POP21_AGE_20_44: 2021 population 20 to 24 years old POP21_AGE_25_29: 2021 population 25 to 29 years old POP21_AGE_30_34: 2021 population 30 to 34 years old POP21_AGE_35_44: 2021 population 35 to 44 years old POP21_AGE_45_54: 2021 population 45 to 54 years old POP21_AGE_55_64: 2021 population 55 to 64 years old POP21_AGE_65_74: 2021 population 65 to 74 years old POP21_AGE_75_84: 2021 population 75 to 84 years old POP21_AGE_85_100: 2021 population 85 years and older POP21_WHITE: 2021 Non-Hispanic White POP21_BLACK: 2021 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP21_AIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP21_ASIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic Asian POP21_HNPI: 2021 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP21_HISPANIC: 2021 HispanicPOP21_MALE: 2021 Male POP21_FEMALE: 2021 Female POV21_WHITE: 2021 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_BLACK: 2021 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_AIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_ASIAN: 2021 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_HNPI: 2021 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_HISPANIC: 2021 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV21_TOTAL: 2021 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP21_TOTAL: 2021 Total PopulationAREA_SQMIL: Area in square milePOP21_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV21_PERCENT: Poverty percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2020 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2021. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

  18. l

    2018 Population and Poverty at Split Tract

    • data.lacounty.gov
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 7, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2024). 2018 Population and Poverty at Split Tract [Dataset]. https://data.lacounty.gov/datasets/2018-population-and-poverty-at-split-tract
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 7, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Tabular data of population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2010 census tracts split by 2018 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/) released 2010 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Field:CT10: 2010 Census tractFIP18: 2018 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2018) CSA: Countywide Statistical Area (CSA) - Unincorporated area community names and LA City neighborhood names.CT10FIP18CSA: 2010 census tract with 2018 city FIPs for incorporated cities, unincorporated areas and LA neighborhoods. SPA12: 2012 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD12: 2012 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP18_AGE_0_4: 2018 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP18_AGE_5_9: 2018 population 5 to 9 years old POP18_AGE_10_14: 2018 population 10 to 14 years old POP18_AGE_15_17: 2018 population 15 to 17 years old POP18_AGE_18_19: 2018 population 18 to 19 years old POP18_AGE_20_44: 2018 population 20 to 24 years old POP18_AGE_25_29: 2018 population 25 to 29 years old POP18_AGE_30_34: 2018 population 30 to 34 years old POP18_AGE_35_44: 2018 population 35 to 44 years old POP18_AGE_45_54: 2018 population 45 to 54 years old POP18_AGE_55_64: 2018 population 55 to 64 years old POP18_AGE_65_74: 2018 population 65 to 74 years old POP18_AGE_75_84: 2018 population 75 to 84 years old POP18_AGE_85_100: 2018 population 85 years and older POP18_WHITE: 2018 Non-Hispanic White POP18_BLACK: 2018 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP18_AIAN: 2018 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP18_ASIAN: 2018 Non-Hispanic Asian POP18_HNPI: 2018 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP18_HISPANIC: 2018 HispanicPOP18_MALE: 2018 Male POP18_FEMALE: 2018 Female POV18_WHITE: 2018 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV18_BLACK: 2018 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV18_AIAN: 2018 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV18_ASIAN: 2018 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV18_HNPI: 2018 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV18_HISPANIC: 2018 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV18_TOTAL: 2018 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP18_TOTAL: 2018 Total PopulationAREA_SQMIL: Area in square milePOP18_DENSITY: Population per square mile.POV18_PERCENT: Poverty percentage.How this data created?The tabular data of population by age groups, by ethnic groups and by gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2010 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Note:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2019. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundary are not the same because boundary is reviewed and updated annually.

  19. l

    2023 Population and Poverty by Split Tract

    • data.lacounty.gov
    • geohub.lacity.org
    • +1more
    Updated May 31, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    County of Los Angeles (2024). 2023 Population and Poverty by Split Tract [Dataset]. https://data.lacounty.gov/datasets/2023-population-and-poverty-by-split-tract/about
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    County of Los Angeles
    Area covered
    Description

    Population by age groups, race and gender, and the poverty by race is attached to the split tract geography to create this split tract with population and poverty data. Split tract data is the product of 2020 census tracts split by 2023 incorporated city boundaries and unincorporated community/countywide statistical areas (CSA) boundaries as of July 1, 2023. The census tract boundaries have been altered and aligned where necessary with legal city boundaries and unincorporated areas, including shoreline/coastal areas. Census Tract:Every 10 years the Census Bureau counts the population of the United States as mandated by Constitution. The Census Bureau (https://www.census.gov/)released 2020 geographic boundaries data including census tracts for the analysis and mapping of demographic information across the United States. City Boundary:City Boundary data is the base map information for the County of Los Angeles. These City Boundaries are based on the Los Angeles County Seamless Cadastral Landbase. The Landbase is jointly maintained by the Los Angeles County Assessor and the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (DPW). This layer represents current city boundaries within Los Angeles County. The DPW provides the most current shapefiles representing city boundaries and city annexations. True, legal boundaries are only determined on the ground by surveyors licensed in the State of California.Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA): The countywide Statistical Area (CSA) was defined to provide a common geographic boundary for reporting departmental statistics for unincorporated areas and incorporated Los Angeles city to the Board of Supervisors. The CSA boundary and CSA names are established by the CIO and the LA County Enterprise GIS group worked with the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors Unincorporated Area and Field Deputies that reflect as best as possible the general name preferences of residents and historical names of areas. This data is primarily focused on broad statistics and reporting, not mapping of communities. This data is not designed to perfectly represent communities, nor jurisdictional boundaries such as Angeles National Forest. CSA represent board approved geographies comprised of Census block groups split by cities.Data Fields:CT20: 2020 Census tractFIP22: 2023 City FIP CodeCITY: City name for incorporated cities and “Unincorporated” for unincorporated areas (as of July 1, 2023) CSA: Countywide Statistical Area (CSA) - Unincorporated area community names and LA City neighborhood names.CT20FIP23CSA: 2020 census tract with 2023 city FIPs for incorporated cities and unincorporated areas and LA neighborhoods. SPA22: 2022 Service Planning Area (SPA) number.SPA_NAME: Service Planning Area name.HD22: 2022 Health District (HD) number: HD_NAME: Health District name.POP23_AGE_0_4: 2023 population 0 to 4 years oldPOP23_AGE_5_9: 2023 population 5 to 9 years old POP23_AGE_10_14: 2023 population 10 to 14 years old POP23_AGE_15_17: 2022 population 15 to 17 years old POP23_AGE_18_19: 2023 population 18 to 19 years old POP23_AGE_20_44: 2023 population 20 to 24 years old POP23_AGE_25_29: 2023 population 25 to 29 years old POP23_AGE_30_34: 2023 population 30 to 34 years old POP23_AGE_35_44: 2023 population 35 to 44 years old POP23_AGE_45_54: 2023 population 45 to 54 years old POP23_AGE_55_64: 2023 population 55 to 64 years old POP23_AGE_65_74: 2023 population 65 to 74 years old POP23_AGE_75_84: 2023 population 75 to 84 years old POP23_AGE_85_100: 2023 population 85 years and older POP23_WHITE: 2023 Non-Hispanic White POP23_BLACK: 2023 Non-Hispanic African AmericanPOP23_AIAN: 2023 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska NativePOP23_ASIAN: 2023 Non-Hispanic Asian POP23_HNPI: 2023 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific IslanderPOP23_HISPANIC: 2023 HispanicPOP23_MALE: 2023 Male POP23_FEMALE: 2023 Female POV23_WHITE: 2023 Non-Hispanic White below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV23_BLACK: 2023 Non-Hispanic African American below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV23_AIAN: 2023 Non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV23_ASIAN: 2023 Non-Hispanic Asian below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV23_HNPI: 2023 Non-Hispanic Hawaiian Native or Pacific Islander below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV23_HISPANIC: 2023 Hispanic below 100% Federal Poverty Level POV23_TOTAL: 2023 Total population below 100% Federal Poverty Level POP23_TOTAL: 2023 Total PopulationAREA_SQMil: Area in square mile.POP23_DENSITY: 2023 Population per square mile.POV23_PERCENT: 2023 Poverty rate/percentage.How this data created?Population by age groups, ethnic groups and gender, and the poverty by ethnic groups is attributed to the split tract geography to create this data. Split tract polygon data is created by intersecting 2020 census tract polygons, LA Country City Boundary polygons and Countywide Statistical Areas (CSA) polygon data. The resulting polygon boundary aligned and matched with the legal city boundary whenever possible. Notes:1. Population and poverty data estimated as of July 1, 2023. 2. 2010 Census tract and 2020 census tracts are not the same. Similarly, city and community boundaries are as of July 1, 2023.

  20. T

    Housing Inventory Estimate: Vacant Housing Units Held Off the Market in the...

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Dec 3, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2020). Housing Inventory Estimate: Vacant Housing Units Held Off the Market in the Northeast Census Region [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/housing-inventory-estimate-vacant-housing-units-held-off-the-market-in-the-northeast-census-region-fed-data.html
    Explore at:
    json, xml, csv, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 1976 - Dec 31, 2025
    Area covered
    Northeastern United States, Northeast
    Description

    Housing Inventory Estimate: Vacant Housing Units Held Off the Market in the Northeast Census Region was 1094.00000 Thous. of Units in July of 2021, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, Housing Inventory Estimate: Vacant Housing Units Held Off the Market in the Northeast Census Region reached a record high of 1405.00000 in October of 2016 and a record low of 787.00000 in July of 2005. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for Housing Inventory Estimate: Vacant Housing Units Held Off the Market in the Northeast Census Region - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on April of 2025.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Zimmermann, Wolfgang; Däumling, Gabriele; Grosse, Julia; Prangen, Melanie; Jautz, Andrea; Koch-Richter, Regina; Hierath, Claudia; Heizmann, Bodo; Lenz, Florian (2024). Censuses in Wuerttemberg, 1834 to 1925 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.4232/1.14072
Organization logo

Censuses in Wuerttemberg, 1834 to 1925

Explore at:
8 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Oct 19, 2024
Dataset provided by
State Archive Baden-Württemberghttps://www.landesarchiv-bw.de/
State Statistical Office Baden-Württemberg
Authors
Zimmermann, Wolfgang; Däumling, Gabriele; Grosse, Julia; Prangen, Melanie; Jautz, Andrea; Koch-Richter, Regina; Hierath, Claudia; Heizmann, Bodo; Lenz, Florian
Time period covered
1834 - 1925
Area covered
Baden-Württemberg
Description

By joining the German Zollverein (Customs Union) in 1834, the Kingdom of Württemberg committed itself to conduct a census in a fixed three-year rhythm according to uniform criteria and with a recording scheme that was as precise as possible. The data obtained in the process formed the basis for the distribution of the common revenues of the German Customs Union. The Kingdom of Wurttemberg conducted the first census as part of the Zollverein on 15 December 1834. The basis of the censuses was the ´resident´ population, which according to the contemporary definition included all people who were present in the place on the reference date. Residents who were currently absent due to a journey were also taken into account. Men and women who were in transit in the census municipality were not included. Until 1858, the ´local´ population, i.e. the population living permanently in the village, was also counted.

The data material of the Zollverein and Reich statistics was collected on the basis of the Oberamtslisten, which have survived in handwritten form (Landesarchiv Baden-Württemberg, Staatsarchiv Ludwigsburg, Bestand E 258 VIII). The data is available at the municipal, Oberamts and district level. The figures reflect the territorial status valid at the time of the census as well as the contemporary administrative division. Four Excel tables are available for each census, in which the data for the municipalities and head offices of a district are summarised.

A crossed-out place name indicates that the municipality in question belonged to another Oberamt at the time of the census. Municipalities that were newly assigned to a Oberamt between 1834 and 1925 are usually added at the end of the Oberamt list. Information on the change of office affiliation can be found in the comment field. An asterisk after a place name (name of the city or village) indicates such supplementary information. The comment field opens as soon as the cursor is placed on the field of the place (city or village) concerned.

The primary researchers supplemented the data material with historical maps. The maps of the four Württemberg districts are taken from the publication: ´Das Königreich Württemberg´ (The Kingdom of Württemberg), which was published by the State Statistical Office in four volumes between 1904 and 1907.´

Explanation of symbols

0 = Less than half of 1 in the last filled position, but more than nothing - = Nothing present (exactly zero) . = Numerical value unknown or to be kept secret x = Table compartment locked because statement does not make sense ... = Statement to be made later / = No statement, as the numerical value is not certain enough () = Statement value limited, as the numerical value may contain errors

Discrepancies in the totals can be explained by rounding the numbers.

Place names that have been crossed out indicate that the municipality in question belonged to a different Oberamt at the time of the census.

  • An asterisk after a place name indicates information about the records in the comment field.´

Publication:

CD-ROM: »Königreich Württemberg« Volkszählungen 1834 bis 1925. Statistisches Landesamt Baden-Württemberg.

Zu bestellen unter: https://www.statistik-bw.de/Service/Veroeff/Statistische_Daten/900208001.bs E-Mail: vertrieb@stala.bwl.de

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu