INTRODUCTION: As California’s homeless population continues to grow at an alarming rate, large metropolitan regions like the San Francisco Bay Area face unique challenges in coordinating efforts to track and improve homelessness. As an interconnected region of nine counties with diverse community needs, identifying homeless population trends across San Francisco Bay Area counties can help direct efforts more effectively throughout the region, and inform initiatives to improve homelessness at the city, county, and metropolitan level. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this research is to compare the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) counts of homelessness across San Francisco Bay Area counties between the years 2018-2022. The secondary objective of this research is to compare the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) counts of homelessness among different age groups in each of the nine San Francisco Bay Area counties between the years 2018-2022. METHODS: Two datasets were used to conduct research. The first dataset (Dataset 1) contains Point-in-Time (PIT) homeless counts published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Dataset 1 was cleaned using Microsoft Excel and uploaded to Tableau Desktop Public Edition 2022.4.1 as a CSV file. The second dataset (Dataset 2) was published by Data SF and contains shapefiles of geographic boundaries of San Francisco Bay Area counties. Both datasets were joined in Tableau Desktop Public Edition 2022.4 and all data analysis was conducted using Tableau visualizations in the form of bar charts, highlight tables, and maps. RESULTS: Alameda, San Francisco, and Santa Clara counties consistently reported the highest annual count of people experiencing homelessness across all 5 years between 2018-2022. Alameda, Napa, and San Mateo counties showed the largest increase in homelessness between 2018 and 2022. Alameda County showed a significant increase in homeless individuals under the age of 18. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this research reveal both stark and fluctuating differences in homeless counts among San Francisco Bay Area Counties over time, suggesting that a regional approach that focuses on collaboration across counties and coordination of services could prove beneficial for improving homelessness throughout the region. Results suggest that more immediate efforts to improve homelessness should focus on the counties of Alameda, San Francisco, Santa Clara, and San Mateo. Changes in homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic years of 2020-2022 point to an urgent need to support Contra Costa County.
In 2023, there were an estimated ******* white homeless people in the United States, the most out of any ethnicity. In comparison, there were around ******* Black or African American homeless people in the U.S. How homelessness is counted The actual number of homeless individuals in the U.S. is difficult to measure. The Department of Housing and Urban Development uses point-in-time estimates, where employees and volunteers count both sheltered and unsheltered homeless people during the last 10 days of January. However, it is very likely that the actual number of homeless individuals is much higher than the estimates, which makes it difficult to say just how many homeless there are in the United States. Unsheltered homeless in the United States California is well-known in the U.S. for having a high homeless population, and Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego all have high proportions of unsheltered homeless people. While in many states, the Department of Housing and Urban Development says that there are more sheltered homeless people than unsheltered, this estimate is most likely in relation to the method of estimation.
"Ratio of Homeless Population to General Population in major US Cities in 2011. *This represents a list of large U.S. cities for which DHS was able to confirm a recent estimate of the unsheltered population. A 2011 result is available for Seattle, WA, Miami, FL, and Boston, MA.. 2011 results are not yet available for the other cities, and their 2009 data are displayed in this chart. General population figures are 2010 estimates in New York, San Francisco, and Chicago, and 2009 estimates elsewhere."
ODC Public Domain Dedication and Licence (PDDL) v1.0http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/pddl/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
The San Francisco Controller's Office maintains a database of spending and revenue data sourced from it's citywide financial system. This data is presented on the Spending and Revenue report hosted at http://openbook.sfgov.org, and is also available in this dataset in CSV format. New data is added on a weekly basis, and is available from fiscal year 2000 forward.
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
The re-emergence of tuberculosis (TB) in the mid-1980s in many parts of the world, including the United States, is often attributed to the emergence and rapid spread of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Although it is well established that TB transmission is particularly amplified in populations with high HIV prevalence, the epidemiology of interaction between TB and HIV is not well understood. This is partly due to the scarcity of HIV-related data, a consequence of the voluntary nature of HIV status reporting and testing, and partly due to current practices of screening high risk populations through separate surveillance programs for HIV and TB. The San Francisco Department of Public Health, TB Control Program, has been conducting active surveillance among the San Francisco high-risk populations since the early 1990s. We present extensive TB surveillance data on HIV and TB infection among the San Francisco homeless to investigate the association between the TB cases and their HIV+ contacts. We applied wavelet coherence and phase analyses to the TB surveillance data from January 1993 through December 2005, to establish and quantify statistical association and synchrony in the highly non-stationary and ostensibly non-periodic waves of TB cases and their HIV+ contacts in San Francisco. When stratified by homelessness, we found that the evolution of TB cases and their HIV+ contacts is highly coherent over time and locked in phase at a specific periodic scale among the San Francisco homeless, but no significant association was observed for the non-homeless. This study confirms the hypothesis that the dynamics of HIV and TB are significantly intertwined and that HIV is likely a key factor in the sustenance of TB transmission among the San Francisco homeless. The findings of this study underscore the importance of contact tracing in detection of HIV+ individuals that may otherwise remain undetected, and thus highlights the ever-increasing need for HIV-related data and an integrative approach to monitoring high-risk populations with respect to HIV and TB transmission.
A. SUMMARY This archived dataset includes data for population characteristics that are no longer being reported publicly. The date on which each population characteristic type was archived can be found in the field “data_loaded_at”.
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED Data on the population characteristics of COVID-19 cases are from: * Case interviews * Laboratories * Medical providers These multiple streams of data are merged, deduplicated, and undergo data verification processes.
Race/ethnicity * We include all race/ethnicity categories that are collected for COVID-19 cases. * The population estimates for the "Other" or “Multi-racial” groups should be considered with caution. The Census definition is likely not exactly aligned with how the City collects this data. For that reason, we do not recommend calculating population rates for these groups.
Gender * The City collects information on gender identity using these guidelines.
Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) occupancy * A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) is a type of long-term care facility that provides care to individuals, generally in their 60s and older, who need functional assistance in their daily lives. * This dataset includes data for COVID-19 cases reported in Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) through 12/31/2022, archived on 1/5/2023. These data were identified where “Characteristic_Type” = ‘Skilled Nursing Facility Occupancy’.
Sexual orientation * The City began asking adults 18 years old or older for their sexual orientation identification during case interviews as of April 28, 2020. Sexual orientation data prior to this date is unavailable. * The City doesn’t collect or report information about sexual orientation for persons under 12 years of age. * Case investigation interviews transitioned to the California Department of Public Health, Virtual Assistant information gathering beginning December 2021. The Virtual Assistant is only sent to adults who are 18+ years old. https://www.sfdph.org/dph/files/PoliciesProcedures/COM9_SexualOrientationGuidelines.pdf">Learn more about our data collection guidelines pertaining to sexual orientation.
Comorbidities * Underlying conditions are reported when a person has one or more underlying health conditions at the time of diagnosis or death.
Homelessness Persons are identified as homeless based on several data sources: * self-reported living situation * the location at the time of testing * Department of Public Health homelessness and health databases * Residents in Single-Room Occupancy hotels are not included in these figures. These methods serve as an estimate of persons experiencing homelessness. They may not meet other homelessness definitions.
Single Room Occupancy (SRO) tenancy * SRO buildings are defined by the San Francisco Housing Code as having six or more "residential guest rooms" which may be attached to shared bathrooms, kitchens, and living spaces. * The details of a person's living arrangements are verified during case interviews.
Transmission Type * Information on transmission of COVID-19 is based on case interviews with individuals who have a confirmed positive test. Individuals are asked if they have been in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. If they answer yes, transmission category is recorded as contact with a known case. If they report no contact with a known case, transmission category is recorded as community transmission. If the case is not interviewed or was not asked the question, they are counted as unknown.
C. UPDATE PROCESS This dataset has been archived and will no longer update as of 9/11/2023.
D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET Population estimates are only available for age groups and race/ethnicity categories. San Francisco po
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘Directory Of Unsheltered Street Homeless To General Population Ratio 2010’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/783fe600-3a75-46d8-8b91-4b626e273ffd on 27 January 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
"Ratio of Homeless Population to General Population in major US Cities in 2010. *This represents a list of large U.S. cities for which DHS was able to confirm a recent estimate of the unsheltered population. A 2010 result is only available for Seattle, WA. Other cities either did not conduct a count in 2010, or their 2010 results are not yet available. 2009 unsheltered census figures were used for Los Angeles, San Francisco, Miami, and Washington, DC, and Boston; the 2007 estimate is used for Chicago. General population figures are the latest estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau."
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
The index is constructed using socioeconomic and demographic, exposure, health, and housing indicators and is intended to serve as a planning tool for health and climate adaptation. Steps for calculating the index can be found in in the "An Assessment of San Francisco’s Vulnerability to Flooding & Extreme Storms" located at https://sfclimatehealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/FloodVulnerabilityReport_v5.pdf.pdfData Dictionary: (see attachment here also: https://data.sfgov.org/Health-and-Social-Services/San-Francisco-Flood-Health-Vulnerability/cne3-h93g)
Field Name Data Type Definition Notes (optional)
Census Blockgroup Text San Francisco Census Block Groups
Children Numeric Percentage of residents under 18 years old. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
Chidlren_wNULLvalues Numeric Percentage of residents under 18 years old. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
Elderly Numeric Percentage of residents aged 65 and older. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
Elderly_wNULLvalues Numeric Percentage of residents aged 65 and older. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
NonWhite Numeric Percentage of residents that do not identify as white (not Hispanic or Latino). American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
NonWhite_wNULLvalues Numeric Percentage of residents that do not identify as white (not Hispanic or Latino). American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
Poverty Numeric Percentage of all individuals below 200% of the poverty level. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
Poverty_wNULLvalues Numeric Percentage of all individuals below 200% of the poverty level. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
Education Numeric Percent of individuals over 25 with at least a high school degree. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
Education_wNULLvalues Numeric Percent of individuals over 25 with at least a high school degree. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
English Numeric Percentage of households with no one age 14 and over who speaks English only or speaks English "very well". American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
English_wNULLvalues Numeric Percentage of households with no one age 14 and over who speaks English only or speaks English "very well". American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
Elevation Numeric Minimum elevation in feet. United States Geologic Survey 2011.
SeaLevelRise Numeric Percent of land area in the 100-year flood plain with 36-inches of sea level rise. San Francisco Sea Level Rise Committee, AECOM 77inch flood inundation layer, 2014.
Precipitation Numeric Percent of land area with over 6-inches of projected precipitation-related flood inundation during an 100-year storm. San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, AECOM, 2015.
Diabetes Numeric Age-adjusted hospitalization rate due to diabetes; adults 18+. California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, 2004-2015.
MentalHealth Numeric Age-adjusted hospitalization rate due to schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, 2004-2015.
Asthma Numeric Age-adjusted hospitalization rate due to asthma; adults 18+. California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, 2004 - 2015.
Disability Numeric Percentage of total civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014.
Disability_wNULLvalues
Percentage of total civilian noninstitutionalized population with a disability. American Community Survey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
HousingQuality Numeric Annual housing violations, per 1000 residents. San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco Department of Building Inspections, San Francisco Fire Department, 2010 - 2012.
Homeless Numeric Homeless population, per 1000 residents. San Francisco Homeless Count 2015.
LivAlone Numeric Households with a householder living alone. American Community Surevey 2009 - 2014.
LivAlone_wNULLvalues Numeric Households with a householder living alone. American Community Surevey 2009 - 2014. Because the American Community Survey uses survey estimates, all data is attached to a margin of error. When the coefficient of variation is over .3, the SFDPH considers this data unstable and gives it a NULL value. However, because principal component analysis and the final development of the flood health index could not use NULL values, SFDPH used this unstable data for these limited purposes. For the purpose of transparency, SFDPH has included both datasets with NULL values and without NULL values.
FloodHealthIndex Numeric Comparative ranking of flood health vulnerability, by block group. The Flood Health Index weights the six socioeconomic and demographic indicators (Children, Elderly, NonWhite, Poverty, Education, English) as 20% of the final score, the three exposure indicators (Sea Level Rise, Precipitation, Elevation) as 40% of the final score, the four health indicators (Diabetes, MentalHealth, Asthma, Disability) as 20% of the final score, and the three housing indicators (HousingQuality, Homeless, LivAlone) as 20% of the final score. For methodology used to develop the final Flood Health Index, please read the San Francisco Flood Vulnerability Assessment Methodology Section.
FloodHealthIndex_Quintiles Numeric Comparative ranking of flood health vulnerability, by block group. The Flood Health Index weights the six socioeconomic and demographic indicators (Children, Elderly, NonWhite, Poverty, Education, English) as 20% of the final score, the three exposure indicators (Sea Level Rise, Precipitation, Elevation) as 40% of the final score, the four health indicators (Diabetes, MentalHealth, Asthma, Disability) as 20% of the final score, and the three housing indicators (HousingQuality, Homeless, LivAlone) as 20% of the final score. For methodology used to develop the final Flood Health Index, please read the San Francisco Flood
A. SUMMARY Geographic zones of the priority areas in the Tenderloin neighborhood used in the COVID-19 assessment and Tenderloin Neighborhood Plan. See more details on the plan here: https://sf.gov/news/san-francisco-releases-tenderloin-neighborhood-safety-assessment-and-plan-covid-19 B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED A team of representative City departments from the Healthy Streets Operation Center (Department of Emergency Management, Department of Public Health, Department of Homelessness and Supportive Housing, Human Rights Commission, San Francisco Police Department, San Francisco Fire Department, and Department of Public Works), SF Homeless Outreach Team, Felton Institute, and community groups and stakeholders was assembled to design and implement a robust Tenderloin Neighborhood Needs Assessment. This assessment was conducted on the morning of April 28, 2020 and consisted of multi-disciplinary teams walking each block of an area of the Tenderloin broken into six geographic zones. These zone locations are shown in the plan, and are mapped in this dataset. C. UPDATE PROCESS This is a reference map that will not be updated. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET These zones can be used with other datasets to track trends by zone. Note that these zones are the priority zones for the Tenderloin Plan and do not represent the entire Tenderloin Neighborhood boundary. For a boundary of the entire Tenderloin, use the analysis neighborhood boundary: https://data.sfgov.org/Geographic-Locations-and-Boundaries/Analysis-Neighborhoods/p5b7-5n3h
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘COVID-19 Cases by Population Characteristics Over Time’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/a3291d85-0076-43c5-a59c-df49480cdc6d on 13 February 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
Note: On January 22, 2022, system updates to improve the timeliness and accuracy of San Francisco COVID-19 cases and deaths data were implemented. You might see some fluctuations in historic data as a result of this change. Due to the changes, starting on January 22, 2022, the number of new cases reported daily will be higher than under the old system as cases that would have taken longer to process will be reported earlier.
A. SUMMARY This dataset shows San Francisco COVID-19 cases by population characteristics and by specimen collection date. Cases are included on the date the positive test was collected.
Population characteristics are subgroups, or demographic cross-sections, like age, race, or gender. The City tracks how cases have been distributed among different subgroups. This information can reveal trends and disparities among groups.
Data is lagged by five days, meaning the most recent specimen collection date included is 5 days prior to today. Tests take time to process and report, so more recent data is less reliable.
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED Data on the population characteristics of COVID-19 cases and deaths are from: * Case interviews * Laboratories * Medical providers
These multiple streams of data are merged, deduplicated, and undergo data verification processes. This data may not be immediately available for recently reported cases because of the time needed to process tests and validate cases. Daily case totals on previous days may increase or decrease. Learn more.
Data are continually updated to maximize completeness of information and reporting on San Francisco residents with COVID-19.
Data notes on each population characteristic type is listed below.
Race/ethnicity * We include all race/ethnicity categories that are collected for COVID-19 cases. * The population estimates for the "Other" or “Multi-racial” groups should be considered with caution. The Census definition is likely not exactly aligned with how the City collects this data. For that reason, we do not recommend calculating population rates for these groups.
Sexual orientation * Sexual orientation data is collected from individuals who are 18 years old or older. These individuals can choose whether to provide this information during case interviews. Learn more about our data collection guidelines. * The City began asking for this information on April 28, 2020.
Gender * The City collects information on gender identity using these guidelines.
Comorbidities * Underlying conditions are reported when a person has one or more underlying health conditions at the time of diagnosis or death.
Transmission type * Information on transmission of COVID-19 is based on case interviews with individuals who have a confirmed positive test. Individuals are asked if they have been in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. If they answer yes, transmission category is recorded as contact with a known case. If they report no contact with a known case, transmission category is recorded as community transmission. If the case is not interviewed or was not asked the question, they are counted as unknown.
Homelessness
Persons are identified as homeless based on several data sources:
* self-reported living situation
* the location at the time of testing
* Department of Public Health homelessness and health databases
* Residents in Single-Room Occupancy hotels are not included in these figures.
These methods serve as an estimate of persons experiencing homelessness. They may not meet other homelessness definitions.
Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) occupancy * A Skilled Nursing
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
A. SUMMARY This archived dataset includes data for population characteristics that are no longer being reported publicly. The date on which each population characteristic type was archived can be found in the field “data_loaded_at”.
To access the dataset that continues to refresh daily, navigate to this page: COVID-19 Deaths by Population Characteristics Over Time. The dataset contains data on the following population characteristics that are no longer being reported publicly:
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED COVID-19 deaths are suspected to be associated with COVID-19. This means COVID-19 is listed as a cause of death or significant condition on the death certificate. Data on the population characteristics of COVID-19 deaths are from: * Case interviews * Laboratories * Medical providers These multiple streams of data are merged, deduplicated, and undergo data verification processes. Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) occupancy * A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) is a type of long-term care facility that provides care to individuals, generally in their 60s and older, who need functional assistance in their daily lives. * This dataset includes data for COVID-19 deaths reported in Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNFs) through 12/31/2022, archived on 1/5/2023. These data were identified where “Characteristic_Type” = ‘Skilled Nursing Facility Occupancy’.
Sexual orientation * The City began asking adults 18 years old or older for their sexual orientation identification during case interviews as of April 28, 2020. Sexual orientation data prior to this date is unavailable. * The City doesn’t collect or report information about sexual orientation for persons under 12 years of age. * Case investigation interviews transitioned to Virtual Assistant information gathering starting December 2021. The California Department of Public Health, Virtual Assistant is only sent to adults who are 18+ years old. Learn more about our data collection guidelines pertaining to sexual orientation.
Comorbidities * Underlying conditions are reported when a person has one or more underlying health conditions at the time of diagnosis or death.
Homelessness Persons are identified as homeless based on several data sources: * self-reported living situation * the location at the time of testing * Department of Public Health homelessness and health databases * Residents in Single-Room Occupancy hotels are not included in these figures. These methods serve as an estimate of persons experiencing homelessness. They may not meet other homelessness definitions.
Single Room Occupancy (SRO) tenancy * SRO buildings are defined by the San Francisco Housing Code as having six or more "residential guest rooms" which may be attached to shared bathrooms, kitchens, and living spaces. * The details of a person's living arrangements are verified during case interviews.
Transmission type * Information on transmission of COVID-19 is based on case interviews with individuals who have a confirmed positive test. Individuals are asked if they have been in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. If they answer yes, transmission category is recorded as contact with a known case. If they report no contact with a known case, transmission category is recorded as community transmission. If the case is not interviewed or was not asked the question, they are counted as unknown.
C. UPDATE PROCESS This dataset will only update when any population characteristics are archived. Data for existing characteristic types will not change but new characteristic types may be added. D. HOW TO USE THIS DATASET This dataset may include different types of characteristics. Filter the “Characteristic Type” column to explore a topic area. Then, the “Characteristic Group” column shows each group or category within that topic area and the number of deaths on each date.
New deaths are the count of deaths within that characteristic group on that specific date. Cumulative deaths are the running total of all San Francisco COVID-19 deaths in that characteristic group up to the date listed.
E. CHANGE LOG
Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically
Analysis of ‘COVID-19 Deaths by Population Characteristics Over Time’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/60f5842f-a359-4b03-ad21-1bcfc3bf7fe6 on 13 February 2022.
--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---
Note: On January 22, 2022, system updates to improve the timeliness and accuracy of San Francisco COVID-19 cases and deaths data were implemented. You might see some fluctuations in historic data as a result of this change.
A. SUMMARY This dataset shows San Francisco COVID-19 deaths by population characteristics and by date. Deaths are included on the date the individual died.
Population characteristics are subgroups, or demographic cross-sections, like age, race, or gender. The City tracks how deaths have been distributed among different subgroups. This information can reveal trends and disparities among groups.
Data is lagged by five days, meaning the most date included is 5 days prior to today. All data update daily as more information becomes available.
B. HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED COVID-19 deaths are suspected to be associated with COVID-19. This means COVID-19 is listed as a cause of death or significant condition on the death certificate.
Data on the population characteristics of COVID-19 deaths are from: * Case interviews * Laboratories * Medical providers
These multiple streams of data are merged, deduplicated, and undergo data verification processes. It takes time to process this data. Because of this, data is lagged by 5 days and death totals for previous days may increase or decrease. More recent data is less reliable.
Data are continually updated to maximize completeness of information and reporting on San Francisco COVID-19 deaths.
Data notes on each population characteristic type is listed below.
Race/ethnicity * We include all race/ethnicity categories that are collected for COVID-19 cases.
Sexual orientation * Sexual orientation data is collected from individuals who are 18 years old or older. These individuals can choose whether to provide this information during case interviews. Learn more about our data collection guidelines. * The City began asking for this information on April 28, 2020. Gender * The City collects information on gender identity using these guidelines.
Comorbidities * Underlying conditions are reported when a person has one or more underlying health conditions at the time of diagnosis or death.
Transmission type * Information on transmission of COVID-19 is based on case interviews with individuals who have a confirmed positive test. Individuals are asked if they have been in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. If they answer yes, transmission category is recorded as contact with a known case. If they report no contact with a known case, transmission category is recorded as community transmission. If the case is not interviewed or was not asked the question, they are counted as unknown.
Homelessness
Persons are identified as homeless based on several data sources:
* self-reported living situation
* the location at the time of testing
* Department of Public Health homelessness and health databases
* Residents in Single-Room Occupancy hotels are not included in these figures.
These methods serve as an estimate of persons experiencing homelessness. They may not meet other homelessness definitions.
Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) occupancy
* A Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) is a type of long-term care facility that provides care to individuals, generally in their 60s and older, who need functional assistance in their daily lives.
* Facilities are mandated to report COVID-19 cases or deaths among their residents. The City follows up with these facilities to confirm.
* There may be differences between the City’s SNF data and the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) dashboard. The difference may be because the City and the State use dif
--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
INTRODUCTION: As California’s homeless population continues to grow at an alarming rate, large metropolitan regions like the San Francisco Bay Area face unique challenges in coordinating efforts to track and improve homelessness. As an interconnected region of nine counties with diverse community needs, identifying homeless population trends across San Francisco Bay Area counties can help direct efforts more effectively throughout the region, and inform initiatives to improve homelessness at the city, county, and metropolitan level. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this research is to compare the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) counts of homelessness across San Francisco Bay Area counties between the years 2018-2022. The secondary objective of this research is to compare the annual Point-in-Time (PIT) counts of homelessness among different age groups in each of the nine San Francisco Bay Area counties between the years 2018-2022. METHODS: Two datasets were used to conduct research. The first dataset (Dataset 1) contains Point-in-Time (PIT) homeless counts published by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Dataset 1 was cleaned using Microsoft Excel and uploaded to Tableau Desktop Public Edition 2022.4.1 as a CSV file. The second dataset (Dataset 2) was published by Data SF and contains shapefiles of geographic boundaries of San Francisco Bay Area counties. Both datasets were joined in Tableau Desktop Public Edition 2022.4 and all data analysis was conducted using Tableau visualizations in the form of bar charts, highlight tables, and maps. RESULTS: Alameda, San Francisco, and Santa Clara counties consistently reported the highest annual count of people experiencing homelessness across all 5 years between 2018-2022. Alameda, Napa, and San Mateo counties showed the largest increase in homelessness between 2018 and 2022. Alameda County showed a significant increase in homeless individuals under the age of 18. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this research reveal both stark and fluctuating differences in homeless counts among San Francisco Bay Area Counties over time, suggesting that a regional approach that focuses on collaboration across counties and coordination of services could prove beneficial for improving homelessness throughout the region. Results suggest that more immediate efforts to improve homelessness should focus on the counties of Alameda, San Francisco, Santa Clara, and San Mateo. Changes in homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic years of 2020-2022 point to an urgent need to support Contra Costa County.