Income limits used to determine the income eligibility of applicants for assistance under three programs authorized by the National Housing Act. These programs are the Section 221(d)(3) Below Market Interest Rate (BMIR) rental program, the Section 235 program, and the Section 236 program. These income limits are listed by dollar amount and family size, and they are effective on the date issued. Due to the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-289), Income Limits used to determine qualification levels as well as set maximum rental rates for projects funded with tax credits authorized under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and projects financed with tax exempt housing bonds issued to provide qualified residential rental development under section 142 of the Code (hereafter referred to as Multifamily Tax Subsidy Projects (MTSPs)) are now calculated and presented separately from the Section 8 income limits.

This dataset and map service provides information on the U.S. Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) low to moderate income areas. The term Low to Moderate Income, often referred to as low-mod, has a specific programmatic context within the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. Over a 1, 2, or 3-year period, as selected by the grantee, not less than 70 percent of CDBG funds must be used for activities that benefit low- and moderate-income persons. HUD uses special tabulations of Census data to determine areas where at least 51% of households have incomes at or below 80% of the area median income (AMI). This dataset and map service contains the following layer.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Program assists very low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled in obtaining decent, safe, and sanitary housing in the private market.

Public Housing Authorities (PHAs) receive federal funds from HUD to administer the voucher program, and housing subsidies are paid to the landlord directly by the PHA on behalf of the participating family. The voucher recipient remains responsible for paying any difference that exists between the actual rent charged by the landlord and the amount subsidized by the program.

Voucher recipients are responsible for finding a suitable housing unit where the owner agrees to rent under the program. Because housing assistance is provided on behalf of the family or individual, participants are free to choose their own housing, including single-family homes, townhouses, and apartments provided that the chosen housing meets the requirements of the program, and is not limited to units located in subsidized housing projects. Qualified housing may also include the family's present residence. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, and if authorized by the PHA, a family may use its voucher to purchase a modest home. Please note that to restrict access to tenant information HCV locations are identified in public records by the owner, and not the tenant. Public data pertaining to the locations of HCV program participants are only available as U.S. Census Tract aggregations. Moreover, to protect the confidentiality of those receiving Housing Choice Voucher Program assistance, tracts containing 10 or fewer voucher holders have been omitted from this service. This dataset includes both tenant-based vouchers and project-based vouchers. HCV_PUBLIC_PCT are calculated using 2020 Census Demographic and Housing Characteristics File (DHC) table H4 Tenure Renter Occupied field. To learn more about the Housing Choice Voucher Program visit: https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/public_indian_housing/programs/hcv/about/, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Data Dictionary: DD_Housing Choice Vouchers by Tract Date of Coverage: Up to 04/2025Last Updated: 5/1/2025

This data, maintained by the Mayor’s Office of Housing (MOH), is an inventory of all income-restricted units in the city. This data includes public housing owned by the Boston Housing Authority (BHA), privately- owned housing built with funding from DND and/or on land that was formerly City-owned, and privately-owned housing built without any City subsidy, e.g., created using Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) or as part of the Inclusionary Development Policy (IDP). Information is gathered from a variety of sources, including the City's IDP list, permitting and completion data from the Inspectional Services Department (ISD), newspaper advertisements for affordable units, Community Economic Development Assistance Corporation’s (CEDAC) Expiring Use list, and project lists from the BHA, the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD), MassHousing, and the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), among others. The data is meant to be as exhaustive and up-to-date as possible, but since many units are not required to report data to the City of Boston, MOH is constantly working to verify and update it. See the data dictionary for more information on the structure of the data and important notes. The database only includes units that have a deed-restriction. It does not include tenant-based (also known as mobile) vouchers, which subsidize rent, but move with the tenant and are not attached to a particular unit. There are over 22,000 tenant-based vouchers in the city of Boston which provide additional affordability to low- and moderate-income households not accounted for here. The Income-Restricted Housing report can be directly accessed here:
https://www.boston.gov/sites/default/files/file/2023/04/Income%20Restricted%20Housing%202022_0.pdf

Learn more about income-restricted housing (as well as other types of affordable housing) here: https://www.boston.gov/affordable-housing-boston#income-restricted

This dataset provides information on Tempe's subsidized housing program, including monthly voucher and funding budgets and expenditures.The City of Tempe Housing Services Division receives federal funds through Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) to subsidize housing for low-income families that is decent, safe, sanitary and affordable. Families served by the program must live at or below 50% of the area median income.Tempe has a fixed number of Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) based on our HUD contract, which represents the maximum number of families that the Housing Authority could assist. Congress and HUD do not fund the program to assist all of the families we are allotted to assist. We can only assist the number of families we have the budget to assist.HUD provides an initial funding amount based on what they anticipate they will allocate to housing assistance payments. The actual amount of funding received is subject to change depending on Federal Budget priorities, Congressional approval and many other factors.Expenditures are reported monthly, as HUD requires expenses to be posted in the month they were incurred rather than the month the expense was paid.The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.05 Subsidized Housing Funding Usage.Additional InformationSource: Manually maintained data, Housing Pro and QuickbooksContact: Levon LamyContact E-Mail: Levon_Lamy@tempe.govData Source Type: CSVPreparation Method: Monthly values are calculated by determining the month each of the expenditures was for and retroactivelly accruing the funding use to the appropriate period. There are multiple, multistep excel worksheets that are used to balance between the specialty Housing Software, City Financial System and the HUD mandated reporting system. Additionally, it is important to note that Funding is allocated by Congress on the Federal Fiscal Year (October - September), the City operates on a Fiscal Year (July - June) and HUD provides funding on the Housing Authority in Calendar Year (January - December) funding increments. Therefore, the City must cross balance between three funding years.Publish Frequency: QuarterlyPublish Method: ManualData Dictionary

Analysis of ‘3.05 Subsidized Housing Funding Usage (summary)’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/6c97f668-67da-4ae8-81a9-b35b7406c076 on 11 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

This dataset provides information on Tempe's subsidized housing program, including monthly voucher and funding budgets and expenditures.

The City of Tempe Housing Services Division receives federal funds through Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) to subsidize housing for low-income families that is decent, safe, sanitary and affordable. Families served by the program must live at or below 50% of the area median income.

Tempe has a fixed number of Housing Choice Vouchers (HCVs) based on our HUD contract, which represents the maximum number of families that the Housing Authority could assist. Congress and HUD do not fund the program to assist all of the families we are allotted to assist. We can only assist the number of families we have the budget to assist.

HUD provides an initial funding amount based on what they anticipate they will allocate to housing assistance payments. The actual amount of funding received is subject to change depending on Federal Budget priorities, Congressional approval and many other factors.

Expenditures are reported monthly, as HUD requires expenses to be posted in the month they were incurred rather than the month the expense was paid.

The performance measure dashboard is available at 3.05 Subsidized Housing Funding Usage.

Additional Information

Source: Manually maintained data, Housing Pro and Quickbooks

Contact: Levon Lamy

Contact E-Mail: Levon_Lamy@tempe.gov

Data Source Type: CSV

Preparation Method: Monthly values are calculated by determining the month each of the expenditures was for and retroactivelly accruing the funding use to the appropriate period. There are multiple, multistep excel worksheets that are used to balance between the specialty Housing Software, City Financial System and the HUD mandated reporting system. Additionally, it is important to note that Funding is allocated by Congress on the Federal Fiscal Year (October - September), the City operates on a Fiscal Year (July - June) and HUD provides funding on the Housing Authority in Calendar Year (January - December) funding increments. Therefore, the City must cross balance between three funding years.

Publish Frequency: Quarterly

Publish Method: Manual

Data Dictionary

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

The Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure List is published annually on or about February 1. The data for the Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure List comes from different sources including federal, state and local programs. This makes it difficult to ensure complete accuracy, so DOH asks municipalities to provide a local administrative review of and input on the street addresses of units and projects as well as information on deed-restricted units. The responses received by DOH vary widely from each municipality. In developing the Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure List, DOH counts: -Assisted housing units or housing receiving financial assistance under any governmental program for the construction or substantial rehabilitation of low and moderate income housing that was occupied or under construction by the end date of the report period for compilation of a given year’s list; -Rental housing occupied by persons receiving rental assistance under C.G.S. Chapter 138a (State Rental Assistance/RAP) or Section 142f of Title 42 of the U.S. Code (Section 8); -Ownership housing or housing currently financed by the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority and/or the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and -Deed-restricted properties or properties with deeds containing covenants or restrictions that require such dwelling unit(s) be sold or rented at or below prices that will preserve the unit(s) as affordable housing as defined in C.G.S. Section 8-39a for persons or families whose incomes are less than or equal to 80% of the area median income.

As one of the Moving To Work agencies in the United States, the Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo (HACSM) receives certain waivers from HUD that allow the implementation of a local Family Self-Sufficiency Program (FSS). The HACSM FSS program was created in 2015 and provides time-limited rental assistance (up to 7 years) and case management services for participating families with the goal of helping the families increase financial self-sufficiency. On an ongoing basis 3 times a year, the FSS coordinators meet with families to assess their needs and record their progress. With the data collected from the assessment, HACSM has expanded partnerships with a variety of educational and financial institutions, work force development and other service providers, ensuring these resources available to the FSS families. A majority of our FSS participants meets their goal to graduate and exit the voucher program in five years but some may need the additional assistance (up to 24 months) to reach educational or vocational goals established in their FSS program. The turnover vouchers allow HACSM to serve new low-income families in the community. The HACSM FSS program includes monetary rewards at graduation. Families that have increased their earned income and savings and completed educational or other goals specified in their FSS Contract of Participation will be rewarded up to $5,000 at the time of successful graduation. Successful graduation is defined as follow: • The household has reached the end of the voucher’s time limit and is not receiving TANF prior to program exit, and • Either head of household, spouse, co-head or any adult member of the household is gainfully employed, or • The household has reached an income level such that HACSM is no longer providing subsidy or they have decided to relinquish their housing voucher before expiration date and have exited the voucher program. The program is designed with five years of rental assistance and case management and can be extended up to seven years on a case-by-case basis. This is important to note because the data shows an increase in FY 2021-22 which is when many of the initial participants were reaching the five to seven year term. Our projected numbers going forward align closer to what was seen in the early years of the FSS program. Also note that in August, 2024 we implemented a new Hardship criteria for extensions of the voucher program for additional assistance (up to 24 months) if the household family's annual gross income is below 80% of AMI and Housing Authority County of San Mateo's utilization rate is below 95%. This explains the estimated number of FSS program participants exiting the voucher program for FY 2024-25 total of 19 (10 actual exits from 7/1/2024 - 12/31/2024 and 9 estimated exits from 1/1/2025 - 6/30/2025) since a high percentage of our families qualify under this criteria.
On an ongoing basis 3 times a year, the FSS coordinators meet with families to assess their needs and record their progress. With the data collected from the assessment, HACSM has expanded partnerships with a variety of educational and financial institutions, work force development and other service providers, ensuring these resources available to the FSS families. A majority of our FSS participants meets their goal to graduate and exit the voucher program in five years but some may need the additional assistance (up to 24 months) to reach educational or vocational goals established in their FSS program. The turnover vouchers allow HACSM to serve new low-income families in the community. The HACSM FSS program includes monetary rewards at graduation. Families that have increased their earned income and savings and completed educational or other goals specified in their FSS Contract of Participation will be rewarded up to $5,000 at the time of successful graduation. Successful graduation is defined as follow: • The household has reached the end of the voucher’s time limit and is not receiving TANF prior to program exit, and • Either head of household, spouse, co-head or any adult member of the household is gainfully employed, or • The household has reached an income level such that HACSM is no longer providing subsidy or they have decided to relinquish their housing voucher before expiration date and have exited the voucher program. The program is designed with five years of rental assistance and case management and can be extended up to seven years on a case-by-case basis. This is important to note because the data shows an increase in FY 2021-22 which is when many of the initial participants were reaching the five to seven year term. Our projected numbers going forward align closer to what was seen in the early years of the FSS program. Also note that in August, 2024 we implemented a new Hardship criteria for extensions of the voucher program for additional assistance (up to 24 months) if the household family's annual gross income is below 80% of AMI and Housing Authority County of San Mateo's utilization rate is below 95%. This explains the estimated number of FSS program participants exiting the voucher program for FY 2024-25 total of 19 (10 actual exits from 7/1/2024 - 12/31/2024 and 9 estimated exits from 1/1/2025 - 6/30/2025) since a high percentage of our families qualify under this criteria.

Multifamily Tax Subsidy Projects (MTSP) Income Limits were developed to meet the requirements established by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-289) that allows 2007 and 2008 projects to increase over time. The MTSP income Limits are used to determine qualification levels as well as set maximum rental rates for projects funded with tax credits authorized under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and projects financed with tax exempt housing bonds issued to provide qualified residential rental development under section 142 of the Code.

The Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo (HACSM) has been the leading provider of affordable housing in San Mateo County, providing rental assistance to over 5,500 households. Our success is a result of our approach to strategic planning and delivery of services. It is our commitment to ensure valuable housing vouchers will be used as a tool to create housing opportunities for low-income households, regardless of race, ethnicity, and disability status. In addition to providing affordable housing, we strive to design our programs as a stepping stone for work-able families to achieve economic independence. The stated performance measure will guide HACSM to achieve its mission and vision. The “maintain greater than 95% voucher utilization” measures the percentage of vouchers in use. The utilization rate is important because (1) HACSM is tasked with assisting, to the maximum extent possible, low-income households that need rental assistance to maintain stable housing and, (2) it meets one of the HUD’s performance measures. The “maintain greater than 95% voucher utilization” measures the percentage of vouchers in use. The utilization rate is important because (1) HACSM is tasked with assisting, to the maximum extent possible, low-income households that need rental assistance to maintain stable housing and, (2) it meets one of the HUD’s performance measures.

Analysis of ‘Affordable Housing by Town 2011-2020’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/12fb0759-dd5d-4701-a95d-3a7365723c24 on 27 January 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

The Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure List is published annually on or about February 1. The data for the Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure List comes from different sources including federal, state and local programs. This makes it difficult to ensure complete accuracy, so DOH asks municipalities to provide a local administrative review of and input on the street addresses of units and projects as well as information on deed-restricted units. The responses received by DOH vary widely from each municipality.

In developing the Affordable Housing Appeals Procedure List, DOH counts:

-Assisted housing units or housing receiving financial assistance under any governmental program for the construction or substantial rehabilitation of low and moderate income housing that was occupied or under construction by the end date of the report period for compilation of a given year’s list; -Rental housing occupied by persons receiving rental assistance under C.G.S. Chapter 138a (State Rental Assistance/RAP) or Section 142f of Title 42 of the U.S. Code (Section 8); -Ownership housing or housing currently financed by the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority and/or the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and -Deed-restricted properties or properties with deeds containing covenants or restrictions that require such dwelling unit(s) be sold or rented at or below prices that will preserve the unit(s) as affordable housing as defined in C.G.S. Section 8-39a for persons or families whose incomes are less than or equal to 80% of the area median income.

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

Multifamily Tax Subsidy Projects (MTSP) Income Limits were developed to meet the requirements established by the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-289) that allows 2007 and 2008 projects to increase over time. The MTSP income Limits are used to determine qualification levels as well as set maximum rental rates for projects funded with tax credits authorized under section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and projects financed with tax exempt housing bonds issued to provide qualified residential rental development under section 142 of the Code.Data for 2013.

The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD) Housing Choice Voucher Program (HCVP) is the federal government's major program for assisting very low-income families, the elderly, and the disabled with decent, safe, sanitary and affordable housing in the private market. Since housing assistance is provided on behalf of the family or individual, participants are able to find their own housing, including single-family homes, townhouses and apartments. The participant is free to choose any housing that meets the requirements of the program and is not limited to units located in subsidized housing projects. Housing choice vouchers (HCV) are administered locally by public housing agencies (PHAs). The PHAs receive federal funds from HUD to administer the voucher program. A family that is issued a housing voucher is responsible for finding a suitable housing unit where the owner agrees to rent under the program. This unit may include the family's present residence. Rental units must meet minimum standards of health and safety, as determined by the PHA. A housing subsidy is paid to the landlord directly by the PHA on behalf of the participating family. The family then pays the difference between the actual rent charged by the landlord and the amount subsidized by the program. Under certain circumstances, if authorized by the PHA, a family may use its voucher to purchase a modest home.HCV locations are identified in public records by the owner and not the tenant so access to this information is restricted to help safeguard the location of HCV units. Due to the sensitive nature of the HCV locations, these are aggregated to the U.S. Census Bureau?s census tract geography.

This layer shows census tracts that meet the following definitions: Census tracts with median household incomes at or below 80 percent of the statewide median income or with median household incomes at or below the threshold designated as low income by the Department of Housing and Community Development’s list of state income limits adopted under Healthy and Safety Code section 50093 and/or Census tracts receiving the highest 25 percent of overall scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 or Census tracts lacking overall scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 due to data gaps, but receiving the highest 5 percent of CalEnviroScreen 4.0 cumulative population burden scores or Census tracts identified in the 2017 DAC designation as disadvantaged, regardless of their scores in CalEnviroScreen 4.0 or Lands under the control of federally recognized Tribes.

This dataset contains multifamily affordable and market-rate housing sites (typically 5+ units) in the City of Detroit that have been built or rehabbed since 2015, or are currently under construction. Most sites are rental housing, though some are for sale. The data are collected from developers, other government departments and agencies, and proprietary data sources in order to track new multifamily and affordable housing construction and rehabilitation occurring in throughout the city, in service of the City's multifamily affordable housing goals. Data are compiled by various teams within the Housing and Revitalization Department (HRD), led by the Preservation Team. This dataset reflects HRD's current knowledge of multifamily units under construction in the city and will be updated as the department's knowledge changes. For more information about the City's multifamily affordable housing policies and goals, visit here.Affordability level for affordable units are measured by the percentage of the Area Median Income (AMI) that a household could earn for that unit to be considered affordable for them. For example, a unit that rents at a 60% AMI threshold would be affordable to a household earning 60% or less of the median income for the area. Rent affordability is typically defined as housing costs consuming 30% or less of monthly income. Regulated housing programs are designed to serve households based on certain income benchmarks relative to AMI, and these income benchmarks vary based on household size. Detroit city's AMI levels are set by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI Metro Fair Market Rent (FMR) area. For more information on AMI in Detroit, visit here.

In April 2013, the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors approved an allocation, through a "Notice of Funding Availability" (NOFA) process, of approximately $13.4 million of unrestricted General Funds for affordable housing purposes. These funds were derived from a one-time distribution of Housing Trust Funds held by former redevelopment agencies in San Mateo County. These unrestricted general funds - which initiated the County's Affordable Housing Fund (AHF) - were set aside to provide financial assistance for the development of multifamily affordable rental housing and provision of emergency and transitional shelter in the County. The Board directed the County's Department of Housing to develop allocation guidelines and recommend projects for funding. As of May 2014, approximately $13.2 million of AHF funds have been allocated, collectively, to six multifamily affordable rental housing developments and four emergency and transitional housing projects ("AHF 1.0").

On August 5, 2014, the County Board of Supervisors authorized the Housing Authority of the County of San Mateo to publish another NOFA, using funds from the Housing Authority's Housing Assistance Program (HAP) Reserves to create affordable housing options for low-, very low-, and extremely low-income households. A total of $5 million was awarded to five projects, including three multifamily affordable housing rental developments, a homeownership project, and a farmworker housing program. This became the second funding round of the AHF ("AHF 2.0").

From landing page:FHFA establishes annual single-family and multifamily housing goals for mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Enterprise Housing Goals include separate categories for single-family mortgages on housing that is affordable to low-income and very low-income families, as well as refinanced mortgages for low-income borrowers. FHFA also establishes separate annual goals for multifamily housing. Loans that are eligible for housing goals credit are mortgages on owner-occupied housing with one to four units. The mortgages must be conventional, conforming mortgages, defined as mortgages that are not insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration or another government agency and with principal balances that do not exceed the conforming loan limits for Enterprise mortgages. This page provides data on Enterprise performance and activity related to the single-family housi​​ng goals. A full glossary of terms is provided below. Single-Family Enterprise Mortgage Acquisitions: Race and Ethnicity Data The new housing goals data tables provide insight on the racial and ethnic composition of loans acquired by the Enterprises that are eligible for housing goals credit. FHFA has provided the racial and ethnic distribution of the Enterprises' acquisitions across each of the current single-family housing goals categories. ​ Single-Family Housing Goal Loan Segments: State-Level Data FHFA is publishing state-level data for each single-family goal loan purchase and refinance segment. It is important to note that FHFA does not set state-level targets but only at the national level. These tables provide the Enterprises' share in each state along with the market share, as calculated by FHFA using the 'static' HMDA data for each year to determine Enterprise housing goals performance each year. It is important to note that HMDA state-level data are impacted by the number of HMDA-exempt reporters in each state. For more information on HMDA reporting requirements, visit the CFPB HMDA Reporting Requirements page.Low-Income Census Tracts, Minority Census Tracts and Designated Disaster Areas Data The Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (Safety and Soundness Act) provides for the establishment of single-family and multifamily goals each year, including a single-family purchase money mortgage goal for families residing in low-income areas. The Safety and Soundness Act defines "low-income area" for the single-family low-income areas home purchase goal as: Census tracts or block numbering areas in which the median income does not exceed 80 percent of area median income (AMI). In addition, for the purposes of this goal, "families residing in low-income areas" also include: Families with income not greater than 100 percent of AMI who reside in minority census tracts. Families with income not greater than 100 percent of AMI who reside in designated disaster areas. ​A "minority census tract" is a census tract that has a minority population of at least 30 percent and a median income of less than 100 percent of the AMI. A "low-income census tract" is census tract in which the median income does not exceed 80 percent of the AMI. Designated disaster areas are identified by FHFA based on the three most recent years' declarations by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), where individual assistance payments were authorized by FEMA. A map of census tracts identified as minority census tracts in 2024 can be ​found here. A map of census tracts identified as low-income census tracts in 2024 can be found here. ​Learn more about low-income census tracts, minority census tracts, and designated disaster areas.

The US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) designates Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) for purposes of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) program. The LIHTC program is defined in Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The LIHTC is a tax incentive intended to increase the availability of affordable rental housing. The LIHTC statute provides two criteria for QCT eligibility. A census tract must have either: 1) a poverty rate of at least 25 percent; or 2) 50 percent or more of its householders must have incomes below 60 percent of the area median household income. The area corresponds to a metropolitan or a non-metropolitan area. Further, the LIHTC statute requires that no more than 20 percent of the metropolitan area population reside within designated QCTs (This limit also applies collectively to the nonmetropolitan counties in each state). Thus, it is possible for a tract to meet one or both of the above criteria, but not be designated as a QCT. With respect to the census tracts, the Census Bureau defines them in cooperation with local authorities every ten years for the purposes of the decennial census and, following a public comment period, has recently completed defining tract boundaries for the 2010 Census. Note that when census tract boundaries are set, they remain unchanged for the next decade. Thus, tract boundaries will not be changed until the 2020 Decennial Census.This is a MD iMAP hosted service. Find more information at https://imap.maryland.gov.Feature Service Link:https://mdgeodata.md.gov/imap/rest/services/BusinessEconomy/MD_HousingDesignatedAreas/FeatureServer/1

The United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA), Rural Development (RD) Agency operates a broad range of programs that were formally administered by the Farmers Home Administration to support affordable housing and community development in rural areas. RD helps rural communities and individuals by providing loans and grants for housing and community facilities. RD provides funding for single family homes, apartments for low-income persons or the elderly, housing for farm laborers, childcare centers, fire and police stations, hospitals, libraries, nursing homes and schools. To learn more, visit: https://www.rd.usda.gov/about-rd/agencies/rural-housing-service, for questions about the spatial attribution of this dataset, please reach out to us at GISHelpdesk@hud.gov. Data Dictionary: DD_USDA_Rural_Housing_by_TractDate of Coverage: 2018

Abstract copyright UK Data Service and data collection copyright owner.

The COntinuous REcording of Lettings and Sales (CORE) is a national information source that provides annual official statistics on new lettings and sales of social housing stock. All datasets are based on administrative data collected via the government's CORE system.

• The CORE lettings data include information on the characteristics of both private registered providers and local authority new social housing tenants and the homes they rent. For each year, data is structured into four datasets based on type of letting (social rent general needs and supported needs, and affordable rent general needs and supported needs). It is a regulatory requirement for providers registered with the Homes and Communities Agency to supply the data. For those who are not registered, submissions are voluntary. Local authorities have participated in CORE since 2004-5 on a voluntary basis. Weighting is applied to adjust for non-response by local authorities for social rent datasets, and imputation is also carried out to address item-level non-response of key data on tenant characteristics for both local authorities and privately registered providers. The three datasets for affordable rent are not weighted or imputed.
• The CORE sales data include information on sales of local authority dwellings and some summary details on sales of registered provider stock (previously known as Registered Social Landlords or housing associations). Collecting these data allows for a better understanding of the socio-economic and demographic make-up of affordable housing customers and local housing markets and products. The sales dataset is imputed, with more information on the imputations within the data dictionary.

The CORE data are used by central government to inform national housing policy and by local government to inform their Strategic Housing Market Assessments. The data are also used by academics, researchers, charities and the wider public to understand social housing issues. Further information may be found on the GOV.UK Social housing lettings and Social housing sales webpages.
Users should note that the Lettings and Sales data are now held in separate datasets at each access level (see below). Previously, they were held in combined studies, SNs 7603, 7604 and 7686, which have now been withdrawn.
End User Licence, Special Licence and Secure Access datasets The CORE datasets are available at three access levels, depending on the level of detail in the data.

• For the standard End User Licence (EUL) version (SNs 9237 and 9238), the geographic level of the data is set at Government Office Region (GOR). Letting and voiding dates are provided at month and year only; age variables are top-coded at 90 years; income, benefits, earnings, charge and shortfall variables are banded to disguise unique values; landlords are grouped into coded categories.
• For the Special Licence access (SL) version (SNs 9239 and 9240), geographic level is set at Local Authority. The SL data have more restrictive access conditions than those made available under the standard EUL. Prospective users of the SL version will need to complete an extra application form and demonstrate to the data owners exactly why they need access to the additional variables in order to get permission to use that version.
• For Secure Access (SNs 9241 and 9242), the full CORE datasets are available, with some key variables recoded. Prospective users of the Secure Access version will need to fulfil additional requirements, including completion of face-to-face training and agreement to further stringent access conditions.

SN 9240: Continuous Recording of Social Housing Sales (CORE):

This study contains the SL-level CORE Sales data only. The SL CORE Lettings data are held under SN 9239.

Main Topics:

The following topics are covered:

• Lettings data: tenant income; tenant benefits; household demographics (including economic status, nationality, etc.); number of affordable or social lettings; reason for requiring social housing; void periods/ number of times offered; rent and other charges; Reasonable Preference Group (including homelessness status); size and type of property.
• Sales data: number of private registered providers of social housing (PRP) sales; type of sale; household demographics; size of property; type of property; tenant income; financial characteristics of sale (mortgage, % discount, equity, etc.); reason for leaving last home; location of new housing; whether served in the Armed Forces.