62 datasets found
  1. Blood_pressure_data_India_2021_Statewise

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated May 17, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NITISH SINGHAL (2022). Blood_pressure_data_India_2021_Statewise [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/nitishsinghal/blood-pressure-data-india-2021-statewise
    Explore at:
    zip(13287 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 17, 2022
    Authors
    NITISH SINGHAL
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Area covered
    India
    Description

    THIS DATA CONTAINS % OF MEN AND WOMEN ABOVE AGE 15 YRS WHO ARE DIAGNOSED WITH ** ||||||||||||| MILD | MODERATE|ELEVATED||||||||||||||

    ** May 17th is observed as World Hypertension Day every year with the aim to raise awareness about prevention, detection, and control of high blood pressure. The theme for this year is “Know Your Numbers” which is to raise awareness about the importance of knowing your blood pressure readings. Hypertension or high blood pressure is one of the key controllable risk factors of chronic health problems such as heart disease and stroke. According to the National Family Health Survey in 2017, one in eight Indians suffer from hypertension which translates to 207 million people (men 112 million, women 95 million). In India, high blood pressure is one of the leading causes of premature deaths. The Global Burden of Diseases study reported that hypertension led to 1.63 million deaths in India in 2016[1]. It is directly responsible for 57% stroke and 24% of coronary heart disease deaths in India

  2. f

    Data from: Blood Pressure Control Has Improved in People with and without...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • plos.figshare.com
    Updated Jul 29, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Baumert, Jens; Holle, Rolf; Rathmann, Wolfgang; Tamayo, Teresa; Meisinger, Christa; Völzke, Henry; Schunk, Michaela; Rückert, Ina-Maria; Schipf, Sabine; Greiser, Karin-Halina; Kluttig, Alexander (2015). Blood Pressure Control Has Improved in People with and without Type 2 Diabetes but Remains Suboptimal: A Longitudinal Study Based on the German DIAB-CORE Consortium [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0001848858
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 29, 2015
    Authors
    Baumert, Jens; Holle, Rolf; Rathmann, Wolfgang; Tamayo, Teresa; Meisinger, Christa; Völzke, Henry; Schunk, Michaela; Rückert, Ina-Maria; Schipf, Sabine; Greiser, Karin-Halina; Kluttig, Alexander
    Description

    BackgroundHypertension is a very common comorbidity and major risk factor for cardiovascular complications, especially in people with Type 2 Diabetes (T2D). Nevertheless, studies in the past have shown that blood pressure is often insufficiently controlled in medical practice. For the DIAB-CARE study, we used longitudinal data based on the German DIAB-CORE Consortium to assess whether health care regarding hypertension has improved during the last decade in our participants.MethodsData of the three regional population-based studies CARLA (baseline 2002-2006 and follow-up 2007-2010), KORA (baseline 1999-2001 and follow-up 2006-2008) and SHIP (baseline 1997-2001 and follow-up 2002-2006) were pooled. Stratified by T2D status we analysed changes in frequencies, degrees of awareness, treatment and control. Linear mixed models were conducted to assess the influence of sex, age, study, and T2D status on changes of systolic blood pressure between the baseline and follow-up examinations (mean observation time 5.7 years). We included 4,683 participants aged 45 to 74 years with complete data and accounted for 1,256 participants who were lost to follow-up by inverse probability weighting.ResultsMean systolic blood pressure decreased in all groups from baseline to follow-up (e.g. – 8.5 mmHg in those with incident T2D). Pulse pressure (PP) was markedly higher in persons with T2D than in persons without T2D (64.14 mmHg in prevalent T2D compared to 52.87 mmHg in non-T2D at baseline) and did not change much between the two examinations. Awareness, treatment and control increased considerably in all subgroups however, the percentage of those with insufficiently controlled hypertension remained high (at about 50% of those with hypertension) especially in prevalent T2D. Particularly elderly people with T2D often had both, high blood pressure ≥140/90 mmHg and a PP of ≥60 mmHg. Blood pressure in men had improved more than in women at follow-up, however, men still had higher mean SBP than women at follow-up.ConclusionBlood pressure management has developed positively during past years in Germany. While hypertension prevalence, awareness and treatment were substantially higher in participants with T2D than in those without T2D at follow-up, hypertension control was achieved only in about half the number of people in each T2D group leaving much room for further improvement.

  3. a

    AIHW - Health Risk Factors - Adults who have High Blood Pressure...

    • data.aurin.org.au
    Updated Mar 6, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). AIHW - Health Risk Factors - Adults who have High Blood Pressure Age-standardised (%) (PHN) 2014-2015 - Dataset - AURIN [Dataset]. https://data.aurin.org.au/dataset/au-govt-aihw-aihw-hrf-age-std-perc-high-blood-pressure-phn-2014-15-phn2015
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 6, 2025
    License

    Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset presents the footprint of the age-standardised percentage of adults who have high blood pressure. High blood pressure (or hypertension), is defined as including any of the following; systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 140 mmHg, or; diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg, or; receiving medication for high blood pressure. As an indication of the accuracy of estimates, 95% confidence intervals were produced. These were calculated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) using standard error estimates of the proportion. The data spans the financial year of 2014-2015 and is aggregated to 2015 Department of Health Primary Health Network (PHN) areas, based on the 2011 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS). Health risk factors are attributes, characteristics or exposures that increase the likelihood of a person developing a disease or health disorder. Examples of health risk factors include risky alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and high blood pressure. High-quality information on health risk factors is important in providing an evidence base to inform health policy, program and service delivery. For further information about this dataset, visit the data source: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Health Risk Factors in 2014-2015 Data Tables. Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data using the Department of Health - PHN Areas. Age-standardisation is a method of removing the influence of age when comparing populations with different age structures - either different populations at the same time or the same population at different times. For this data the Australian estimated resident population of people aged 18 and over as at 30 June 2001 has been used as the standard population. Adults are defined as persons aged 18 years and over. Values assigned to "n.p." in the original data have been removed from the data.

  4. Share of individuals suffering from hypertension in Italy 2016-2022

    • statista.com
    Updated Nov 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Share of individuals suffering from hypertension in Italy 2016-2022 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/814496/share-of-individuals-suffering-with-hypertension-in-italy/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 29, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    Italy
    Description

    The share of individuals suffering from hypertension in Italy increased between 2016 and 2022. According to the data, in 2016 the percentage of people affected by high blood pressure was equal to **** percent, while in 2022 it reached **** percent. This statistic displays the share of individuals suffering from hypertension in Italy from 2016 to 2022.

  5. f

    Data_Sheet_1_Heavy Disease Burden of High Systolic Blood Pressure During...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    pdf
    Updated Jun 6, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ming-Ming Chen; Xingyuan Zhang; Ye-Mao Liu; Ze Chen; Haomiao Li; Fang Lei; Juan-Juan Qin; Yanxiao Ji; Peng Zhang; Jingjing Cai; Zhi-Gang She; Xiao-Jing Zhang; Zhibing Lu; Hui Liu; Hongliang Li (2023). Data_Sheet_1_Heavy Disease Burden of High Systolic Blood Pressure During 1990-2019: Highlighting Regional, Sex, and Age Specific Strategies in Blood Pressure Control.pdf [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.754778.s001
    Explore at:
    pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 6, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Ming-Ming Chen; Xingyuan Zhang; Ye-Mao Liu; Ze Chen; Haomiao Li; Fang Lei; Juan-Juan Qin; Yanxiao Ji; Peng Zhang; Jingjing Cai; Zhi-Gang She; Xiao-Jing Zhang; Zhibing Lu; Hui Liu; Hongliang Li
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Objective: High systolic blood pressure (HSBP) remains the leading risk factor for mortality worldwide; however, limited data have revealed all-cause and cause-specific burdens attributed to HSBP at global and regional levels. This study aimed to estimate the global burden and priority diseases attributable to HSBP by region, sex, and age.Methods: Based on data and evaluation methods from the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019, we estimated trends of age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR), the age-standardized rate of disability-adjusted life years (ASDRs), and the age-standardized rate of years lived with disability (ASYRs) attributable to HSBP during 1990-2019. Further, we analyzed cause-specific burdens attributable to HSBP by sex, age, year, and region.Results: Globally, a significant downtrend was found in the ASMR attributed to HSBP while ASYRs did not change substantially during 1990-2019. The majority of HSBP burden has shifted from high-middle sociodemographic index (SDI) regions to lower SDI regions. All-cause and most cause-specific burdens related to HSBP were improved in high SDI regions but the downtrends have stagnated in recent years. Although many cause-specific deaths associated with HSBP declined, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and endocarditis associated deaths were aggravated globally and ischemic heart disease (IHD), atrial fibrillation and flutter, aortic aneurysm (AA), and peripheral artery disease (PAD) associated deaths were on the rise in low/low-middle/middle SDI regions. Additionally, males had higher disease burdens than females. Middle-aged people with CVDs composed the major subgroup affected by HSBP while older people had the highest ASMRs associated with HSBP.Conclusions: This study revealed the global burden and priority diseases attributable to HSBP with wide variation by region, sex, and age, calling for effective and targeted strategies to reduce the prevalence and mortality of HSBP, especially in low/low-middle/middle SDI regions.

  6. Data from: High Blood Pressure in Pre-Adolescents and Adolescents in...

    • scielo.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated May 31, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Flavio Figueirinha; Gesmar Volga Haddad Herdy (2023). High Blood Pressure in Pre-Adolescents and Adolescents in Petrópolis: Prevalence and Correlation with Overweight and Obesity [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7517099.v1
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 31, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    SciELOhttp://www.scielo.org/
    Authors
    Flavio Figueirinha; Gesmar Volga Haddad Herdy
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Abstract Background: Arterial hypertension is a multisystem disease that increases the risk of fatal cardiac events. Objectives: This study aims to determine the prevalence of increased blood pressure levels of pre-adolescents and adolescents and correlate these pressure levels with the presence of overweight or obesity and family history of hypertension. Methods: In an observational, cross-sectional study, a sample of 157 students from the city of Petropolis aged from ten to nineteen was randomly selected. The study included four public schools and one private school. The persons responsible for each student answered a questionnaire on pre-existing conditions, family history of hypertension and previous blood pressure measurements. A thorough physical examination, anthropometric evaluation and two blood pressure readings were taken at intervals of at least ten minutes, on three different occasions, totaling six measurements. Results: Blood pressure levels have shown to be abnormal in 17 (10.8% / IC95% 5.9-15.7) studied individuals. Statistical significance was found between the change in blood pressure and the presence of overweight and obesity (p < 0.001), as well as with the presence of family history of hypertension (p < 0.05). A portion of 32.5% of the subjects had never had their blood pressure measured, and over the twelve months prior to the study, 45.5% of the sample had not measured it either. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a significant percentage of students in the city of Petrópolis, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, has high blood pressure with a statistically significant correlation with overweight or obesity and a family history of hypertension.

  7. a

    Asian Subgroup - Chronic Disease - Ever diagnosed with high blood pressure

    • data-mountainview.opendata.arcgis.com
    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated May 23, 2016
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Model Health Organization (2016). Asian Subgroup - Chronic Disease - Ever diagnosed with high blood pressure [Dataset]. https://data-mountainview.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/5341cbde9fc44e9090e0a0c4c544271d
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 23, 2016
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Model Health Organization
    Description

    More than one-quarter (27%) of adults have ever been diagnosed with high blood pressure. This percentage is higher among Japanese (41%) and Vietnamese (33%) adults than among Asian Indian (7%), Chinese (15%), and other Asian/Pacific Islander (17%) adults.

  8. b

    Hypertension prevalence - ICP Outcomes Framework - Registered Locality

    • cityobservatory.birmingham.gov.uk
    csv, excel, geojson +1
    Updated Sep 9, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Hypertension prevalence - ICP Outcomes Framework - Registered Locality [Dataset]. https://cityobservatory.birmingham.gov.uk/explore/dataset/hypertension-prevalence-icp-outcomes-framework-registered-locality/
    Explore at:
    csv, json, geojson, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 9, 2025
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset reports the percentage of patients registered with a general practice who have a recorded diagnosis of established hypertension. The data is derived from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) provided by NHS Digital. It offers a snapshot of the burden of hypertension within primary care populations and supports efforts to monitor and manage this key cardiovascular risk factor.

    Rationale Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease, stroke, and kidney disease. Reducing its prevalence is a public health priority. This indicator helps identify the scale of the issue within GP-registered populations and supports targeted interventions to improve detection, treatment, and control of high blood pressure.

    Numerator The numerator includes all patients with a diagnosis of established hypertension, as recorded on their GP practice's disease register. This information is collected through the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), which incentivizes accurate clinical coding and record-keeping.

    Denominator The denominator is the total number of patients registered at the GP practice, also sourced from the QOF. This allows for the calculation of the proportion of patients affected by hypertension.

    Caveats There are no specific caveats noted for this indicator. However, the accuracy of prevalence estimates depends on consistent diagnosis and recording practices across GP practices. Underdiagnosis or variations in coding may affect comparability between practices or regions.

    External References Further information and related indicators can be found on the Fingertips Public Health Profiles website.

    Localities ExplainedThis dataset contains data based on either the resident locality or registered locality of the patient, a distinction is made between resident locality and registered locality populations:Resident Locality refers to individuals who live within the defined geographic boundaries of the locality. These boundaries are aligned with official administrative areas such as wards and Lower Layer Super Output Areas (LSOAs).Registered Locality refers to individuals who are registered with GP practices that are assigned to a locality based on the Primary Care Network (PCN) they belong to. These assignments are approximate—PCNs are mapped to a locality based on the location of most of their GP surgeries. As a result, locality-registered patients may live outside the locality, sometimes even in different towns or cities.This distinction is important because some health indicators are only available at GP practice level, without information on where patients actually reside. In such cases, data is attributed to the locality based on GP registration, not residential address.

    Click here to explore more from the Birmingham and Solihull Integrated Care Partnerships Outcome Framework.

  9. f

    Data from: Multiple cardiovascular risk factor care in 55 low- and...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • scholardata.sun.ac.za
    Updated Apr 15, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Gower, Emily W; Wong-McClure, Roy; Gurung, Mongal; Houehanou, Corine; Andall-Brereton, Glennis; Farzadfar, Farshad; Manne-Goehler, Jennifer; Mwalim, Omar; Sturua, Lela; Houinato, Dismand; Jorgensen, Jutta; Ghamari, Seyyed-Hadi; Davies, Justine; Sibai, Abla; Moghaddam, Sahar Saeedi; Franceschini, Nora; Mwangi, Kibachio Joseph; Guwatudde, David; Gathecha, Gladwell; Dorobantu, Maria; Tien, Dessie V.; Kinlaw, Alan; Bicaba, Brice; Stürmer, Til; Abbasi-Kangevari, Mohsen; Theilmann, Michaela; Seiglie, Jacqueline A.; Flood, David; Mayige, Mary; Tsabedze, Lindiwe; Ali, Mohammed K; Aryal, Krishna; Bärnighausen, Till; Rahim, Nicholas E.; Norov, Bolormaa; Agoudavi, Kokou; Vollmer, Sebastian; Hwalla, Nahla; Bovet, Pascal; Bahendeka, Silver; Kagaruki, Gibson; Quesnel-Crooks, Sarah; Martins, Joao; Geldsetzer, Pascal; Wesseh, Chea; Atun, Rifat; Marcus, Maja E.; Diallo, Alpha Oumar; Karki, Khem (2024). Multiple cardiovascular risk factor care in 55 low- and middle-income countries: A cross-sectional analysis of nationally-representative, individual-level data from 280,783 adults [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0001343303
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 15, 2024
    Authors
    Gower, Emily W; Wong-McClure, Roy; Gurung, Mongal; Houehanou, Corine; Andall-Brereton, Glennis; Farzadfar, Farshad; Manne-Goehler, Jennifer; Mwalim, Omar; Sturua, Lela; Houinato, Dismand; Jorgensen, Jutta; Ghamari, Seyyed-Hadi; Davies, Justine; Sibai, Abla; Moghaddam, Sahar Saeedi; Franceschini, Nora; Mwangi, Kibachio Joseph; Guwatudde, David; Gathecha, Gladwell; Dorobantu, Maria; Tien, Dessie V.; Kinlaw, Alan; Bicaba, Brice; Stürmer, Til; Abbasi-Kangevari, Mohsen; Theilmann, Michaela; Seiglie, Jacqueline A.; Flood, David; Mayige, Mary; Tsabedze, Lindiwe; Ali, Mohammed K; Aryal, Krishna; Bärnighausen, Till; Rahim, Nicholas E.; Norov, Bolormaa; Agoudavi, Kokou; Vollmer, Sebastian; Hwalla, Nahla; Bovet, Pascal; Bahendeka, Silver; Kagaruki, Gibson; Quesnel-Crooks, Sarah; Martins, Joao; Geldsetzer, Pascal; Wesseh, Chea; Atun, Rifat; Marcus, Maja E.; Diallo, Alpha Oumar; Karki, Khem
    Description

    The prevalence of multiple age-related cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors is high among individuals living in low- and middle-income countries. We described receipt of healthcare services for and management of hypertension and diabetes among individuals living with these conditions using individual-level data from 55 nationally representative population-based surveys (2009–2019) with measured blood pressure (BP) and diabetes biomarker. We restricted our analysis to non-pregnant individuals aged 40–69 years and defined three mutually exclusive groups (i.e., hypertension only, diabetes only, and both hypertension-diabetes) to compare individuals living with concurrent hypertension and diabetes to individuals with each condition separately. We included 90,086 individuals who lived with hypertension only, 11,975 with diabetes only, and 16,228 with hypertension-diabetes. We estimated the percentage of individuals who were aware of their diagnosis, used pharmacological therapy, or achieved appropriate hypertension and diabetes management. A greater percentage of individuals with hypertension-diabetes were fully diagnosed (64.1% [95% CI: 61.8–66.4]) than those with hypertension only (47.4% [45.3–49.6]) or diabetes only (46.7% [44.1–49.2]). Among the hypertension-diabetes group, pharmacological treatment was higher for individual conditions (38.3% [95% CI: 34.8–41.8] using antihypertensive and 42.3% [95% CI: 39.4–45.2] using glucose-lowering medications) than for both conditions jointly (24.6% [95% CI: 22.1–27.2]).The percentage of individuals achieving appropriate management was highest in the hypertension group (17.6% [16.4–18.8]), followed by diabetes (13.3% [10.7–15.8]) and hypertension-diabetes (6.6% [5.4–7.8]) groups. Although health systems in LMICs are reaching a larger share of individuals living with both hypertension and diabetes than those living with just one of these conditions, only seven percent achieved both BP and blood glucose treatment targets. Implementation of cost-effective population-level interventions that shift clinical care paradigm from disease-specific to comprehensive CVD care are urgently needed for all three groups, especially for those with multiple CVD risk factors.

  10. Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in United...

    • plos.figshare.com
    tiff
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Casey Olives; Rebecca Myerson; Ali H. Mokdad; Christopher J. L. Murray; Stephen S. Lim (2023). Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control of Hypertension in United States Counties, 2001–2009 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060308
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Casey Olives; Rebecca Myerson; Ali H. Mokdad; Christopher J. L. Murray; Stephen S. Lim
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Hypertension is an important and modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality. Over the last decade, national-levels of controlled hypertension have increased, but little information on hypertension prevalence and trends in hypertension treatment and control exists at the county-level. We estimate trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in US counties using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in five two-year waves from 1999–2008 including 26,349 adults aged 30 years and older and from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) from 1997–2009 including 1,283,722 adults aged 30 years and older. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) of at least 140 mm Hg, self-reported use of antihypertensive treatment, or both. Hypertension control was defined as systolic BP less than 140 mm Hg. The median prevalence of total hypertension in 2009 was estimated at 37.6% (range: 26.5 to 54.4%) in men and 40.1% (range: 28.5 to 57.9%) in women. Within-state differences in the county prevalence of uncontrolled hypertension were as high as 7.8 percentage points in 2009. Awareness, treatment, and control was highest in the southeastern US, and increased between 2001 and 2009 on average. The median county-level control in men was 57.7% (range: 43.4 to 65.9%) and in women was 57.1% (range: 43.0 to 65.46%) in 2009, with highest rates in white men and black women. While control of hypertension is on the rise, prevalence of total hypertension continues to increase in the US. Concurrent increases in treatment and control of hypertension are promising, but efforts to decrease the prevalence of hypertension are needed.

  11. Adults with hypertension in the U.S. by state 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Sep 15, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Adults with hypertension in the U.S. by state 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/505995/adults-with-hypertension-in-the-us-by-states/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Sep 15, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    In 2023, almost 46 percent of adults in Alabama suffered from hypertension. This statistic depicts the rate of adults suffering from hypertension in the United States in 2023, sorted by state.

  12. d

    AIHW - Health Risk Factors - Adults who have Uncontrolled High Blood...

    • data.gov.au
    ogc:wfs, wms
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    AIHW - Health Risk Factors - Adults who have Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure Age-standardised (%) (PHN) 2014-2015 [Dataset]. https://data.gov.au/dataset/ds-aurin-3045cab0e377ed9c3e29523e143341fc5025c40c1d52177c980f4ca9d9318494
    Explore at:
    wms, ogc:wfsAvailable download formats
    Description

    This dataset presents the footprint of the age-standardised percentage of adults who are overweight. Uncontrolled high blood pressure (measured high blood pressure) is defined as including any of …Show full descriptionThis dataset presents the footprint of the age-standardised percentage of adults who are overweight. Uncontrolled high blood pressure (measured high blood pressure) is defined as including any of the following; measured systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or more, or; diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or more, and; irrespective of the use of blood pressure medication. As an indication of the accuracy of estimates, 95% confidence intervals were produced. These were calculated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) using standard error estimates of the proportion. The data spans the financial year of 2014-2015 and is aggregated to 2015 Department of Health Primary Health Network (PHN) areas, based on the 2011 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS). Health risk factors are attributes, characteristics or exposures that increase the likelihood of a person developing a disease or health disorder. Examples of health risk factors include risky alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and high blood pressure. High-quality information on health risk factors is important in providing an evidence base to inform health policy, program and service delivery. For further information about this dataset, visit the data source: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Health Risk Factors in 2014-2015 Data Tables. Please note: AURIN has spatially enabled the original data using the Department of Health - PHN Areas. Age-standardisation is a method of removing the influence of age when comparing populations with different age structures - either different populations at the same time or the same population at different times. For this data the Australian estimated resident population of people aged 18 and over as at 30 June 2001 has been used as the standard population. Adults are defined as persons aged 18 years and over. Data for PHN701 (Northern Territory) should be interpreted with caution as the National Health Survey excluded discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and very remote areas, which comprise around 28% of the estimated resident population of the Northern Territory living in private dwellings. Copyright attribution: Government of the Commonwealth of Australia - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, (2017): ; accessed from AURIN on 12/3/2020. Licence type: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY 3.0 AU)

  13. a

    U.S. High Blood Pressure Medication Nonadherence 2018

    • hub.arcgis.com
    Updated Nov 19, 2020
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2020). U.S. High Blood Pressure Medication Nonadherence 2018 [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/datasets/dca29dc219244ab0bb3b492a9d74573f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 19, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Area covered
    Description

    Create maps of U.S. blood pressure medication nonadherence among Medicare Part D beneficiaries aged 65 and older, by county. Data can be stratified by race/ethnicity and blood pressure medication class. Blood pressure medication nonadherence is defined as a proportion of days a beneficiary was covered with blood pressure medication of <80%.Visit the CDC/DHDSP Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke for additional data and maps. Atlas of Heart Disease and StrokeData Source and MethodologyAntihypertensive nonadherence, defined as a proportion of days a beneficiary was covered with antihypertensives of <80%, was assessed using prescription drug claims data among Medicare Advantage or Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with Medicare Part D coverage. Administrative data and prescription drug event data were accessed via the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. Analyses were stratified by antihypertensive class, beneficiaries’ state and county of residence, type of prescription drug plan, and treatment and demographic characteristics. Visit the Vital Signs Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report for more detailed information.Data DictionaryData for counties with small populations are not displayed when a reliable rate could not be generated. These counties are represented in the data with values of '-1.' CDC/DHDSP excludes these values when classifying the data on a map, indicating those counties as 'Insufficient Data.'Data field names and descriptions  stcty_fips: state FIPS code + county FIPS code  county: county name  Blood pressure medication nonadherence percentage for Medicare Part D Beneficiaries aged 65 and older    htnadh_all: All beneficiaries    htnadh_aian: American Indian and Alaska Native, non-Hispanic beneficiaries    htnadh_api: Asian and Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic beneficiaries    htnadh_black: Black, non-Hispanic beneficiaries    htnadh_hisp: Hispanic beneficiaries    htnadh_white: White, non-Hispanic beneficiaries    diuradh: Diuretic nonadherence    rasadh: Renin-Angiotensin System nonadherenceMore Questions?Interactive Atlas of Heart Disease and StrokeData SourcesStatistical Methods

  14. r

    AIHW - Health Risk Factors - Adults who have Uncontrolled High Blood...

    • researchdata.edu.au
    null
    Updated Jun 28, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Government of the Commonwealth of Australia - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2023). AIHW - Health Risk Factors - Adults who have Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure Crude (%) (PHN) 2014-2015 [Dataset]. https://researchdata.edu.au/aihw-health-risk-2014-2015/2743065
    Explore at:
    nullAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Australian Urban Research Infrastructure Network (AURIN)
    Authors
    Government of the Commonwealth of Australia - Australian Institute of Health and Welfare
    License

    Attribution 3.0 (CC BY 3.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Description

    This dataset presents the footprint of the crude percentage of adults who have uncontrolled high blood pressure. Uncontrolled high blood pressure (measured high blood pressure) is defined as including any of the following; measured systolic blood pressure of 140 mmHg or more, or; diastolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or more, and; irrespective of the use of blood pressure medication. As an indication of the accuracy of estimates, 95% confidence intervals were produced. These were calculated by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) using standard error estimates of the proportion. The data spans the financial year of 2014-2015 and is aggregated to 2015 Department of Health Primary Health Network (PHN) areas, based on the 2011 Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS).

    Health risk factors are attributes, characteristics or exposures that increase the likelihood of a person developing a disease or health disorder. Examples of health risk factors include risky alcohol consumption, physical inactivity and high blood pressure. High-quality information on health risk factors is important in providing an evidence base to inform health policy, program and service delivery.

    For further information about this dataset, visit the data source: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare - Health Risk Factors in 2014-2015 Data Tables.

    Please note:

    • AURIN has spatially enabled the original data using the Department of Health - PHN Areas.

    • The health risks factors reported are known to vary with age and the different PHN area populations are known to have a range of age structures. As such, comparisons of results between the PHN areas should be made with caution because the crude rates presented do not account for these age differences.

    • Adults are defined as persons aged 18 years and over.

    • Values assigned to "n.p." in the original data have been removed from the data.

    • Data for PHN701 (Northern Territory) should be interpreted with caution as the National Health Survey excluded discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities and very remote areas, which comprise around 28% of the estimated resident population of the Northern Territory living in private dwellings.

  15. Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Heart Disease

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Jan 12, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Devastator (2023). Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Heart Disease [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/thedevastator/exploring-risk-factors-for-cardiovascular-diseas
    Explore at:
    zip(944471 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 12, 2023
    Authors
    The Devastator
    Description

    Exploring Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease in Adults

    Examining Age, Gender, Height, Weight and Health Metrics

    By Kuzak Dempsy [source]

    About this dataset

    This dataset contains detailed information on the risk factors for cardiovascular disease. It includes information on age, gender, height, weight, blood pressure values, cholesterol levels, glucose levels, smoking habits and alcohol consumption of over 70 thousand individuals. Additionally it outlines if the person is active or not and if he or she has any cardiovascular diseases. This dataset provides a great resource for researchers to apply modern machine learning techniques to explore the potential relations between risk factors and cardiovascular disease that can ultimately lead to improved understanding of this serious health issue and design better preventive measures

    More Datasets

    For more datasets, click here.

    Featured Notebooks

    • 🚨 Your notebook can be here! 🚨!

    How to use the dataset

    This dataset can be used to explore the risk factors of cardiovascular disease in adults. The aim is to understand how certain demographic factors, health behaviors and biological markers affect the development of heart disease.

    To start, look through the columns of data and familiarize yourself with each one. Understand what each field means and how it relates to heart health: - Age: Age of participant (integer) - Gender: Gender of participant (male/female). - Height: Height measured in centimeters (integer) - Weight: Weight measured in kilograms (integer) - Ap_hi: Systolic blood pressure reading taken from patient (integer) - Ap_lo : Diastolic blood pressure reading taken from patient (integer) - Cholesterol : Total cholesterol level read as mg/dl on a scale 0 - 5+ units( integer). Each unit denoting increase/decrease by 20 mg/dL respectively.
    ‐ Gluc : Glucose level read as mmol/l on a scale 0 - 16+ units( integer). Each unit denoting increase Decreaseby 1 mmol/L respectively. ‐ Smoke : Whether person smokes or not(binary; 0= No , 1=Yes). ‐ Alco ​ : Whether person drinks alcohol or not(binary; 0 =No ,1 =Yes ). • Active : whether person physically active or not( Binary ;0 =No,1 = Yes ). . Cardio : whether person suffers from cardiovascular diseases or not(Binary ;0 – no , 1 ‑yes ).Identify any trends between the different values for each attribute and the developmetn for cardiovascular disease among individuals represented by this dataset . Age, gender, weight, lifestyle practices like smoking & drinking alcohol are all key influences when analyzing this problem set. You can always modify pieces of your analysis until you're able to find patterns that will enable you make conclusions based on your understanding & exploration. You can further enrich your understanding using couple mopdeling technique like Regressions & Classification models over this dataset alongwith latest Deep Learning approach! Have Fun!

    Research Ideas

    • Analyzing the effect of lifestyle and environmental factors on the risk of cardiovascular disease.
    • Predicting the risks of different age groups based on their demographic characteristics such as gender, height, weight and smoking status.
    • Detecting patterns between levels of physical activity, blood pressure and cholesterol levels with likelihood of developing cardiovascular disease among individuals

    Acknowledgements

    If you use this dataset in your research, please credit the original authors. Data Source

    License

    See the dataset description for more information.

    Columns

    File: heart_data.csv | Column name | Description | |:----------------|:---------------------------------------------------------| | age | Age of the individual. (Integer) | | gender | Gender of the individual. (String) | | height | Height of the individual in centimeters. (Integer) | | weight | Weight of the individual in kilograms. (Integer) | | ap_hi | Systolic blood pressure reading. (Integer) | | ap_lo | Diastolic blood pressure reading. (Integer) | | cholesterol | Cholesterol level of the individual. (Integer) | | gluc |...

  16. Unplanned hospitalisation for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions...

    • ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk
    Updated Aug 4, 2015
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk (2015). Unplanned hospitalisation for chronic ambulatory care sensitive conditions (NHSOF 2.3.i) - Dataset - data.gov.uk [Dataset]. https://ckan.publishing.service.gov.uk/dataset/unplanned-hospitalisation-for-chronic-ambulatory-care-sensitive-conditions-nhsof-2-3-i
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 4, 2015
    Dataset provided by
    CKANhttps://ckan.org/
    License

    Open Government Licence 3.0http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This indicator measures how many people with specific long-term conditions, which should not normally require hospitalisation, are admitted to hospital in an emergency. These conditions include, for example, diabetes, epilepsy and high blood pressure. Purpose This outcome is concerned with how successfully the NHS manages to reduce emergency admissions for all long-term conditions where optimum management can be achieved in the community. Current version updated: Feb-17 Next version due: Feb-18

  17. Table_1_Body mass index, body fat percentage, and visceral fat as mediators...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    docx
    Updated Jun 3, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tham T. Nguyen; Minh H. Nguyen; Yen H. Nguyen; Thao T. P. Nguyen; Manh H. Giap; Tung D. X. Tran; Thu T. M. Pham; Khue M. Pham; Kien T. Nguyen; Vinh-Tuyen T. Le; Chien-Tien Su; Tuyen Van Duong (2023). Table_1_Body mass index, body fat percentage, and visceral fat as mediators in the association between health literacy and hypertension among residents living in rural and suburban areas.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.877013.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 3, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers Mediahttp://www.frontiersin.org/
    Authors
    Tham T. Nguyen; Minh H. Nguyen; Yen H. Nguyen; Thao T. P. Nguyen; Manh H. Giap; Tung D. X. Tran; Thu T. M. Pham; Khue M. Pham; Kien T. Nguyen; Vinh-Tuyen T. Le; Chien-Tien Su; Tuyen Van Duong
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    BackgroundHypertension is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Enhancing health literacy (HL) may help to alleviate the risk of hypertension and its burden. However, evidence on the association between HL and hypertension and potential mechanisms remain to be explored.ObjectivesThis study examined the association between HL and hypertension; and explored whether body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage (PBF), and visceral fat (VF) were mediators of this association in people who resided in rural and suburban areas in Vietnam.MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted from 1st July to 31st December 2019, involving 1655 residents and exploring participants' sociodemographic characteristics, HL, health-related behaviors, comorbidities, body composition, and blood pressure (BP). People with systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg or using antihypertensive medication were classified as having hypertension. Multiple logistic regression and mediation analyses were used to explore associations.ResultsThe hypertension prevalence was 41.9% (694/1,655). In adjusted models, a higher HL score was associated with a lower hypertension likelihood (OR = 0.96; 95%CI = 0.95–0.97; p < 0.001). Factors associated with a higher odd of hypertension were overweight/obese (OR = 1.69; 95%CI = 1.24–2.29; p = 0.001), high PBF (OR = 2.35; 95%CI = 1.85–2.99; p < 0.001), and high VF (OR = 2.27; 95%CI = 1.63–3.16; p < 0.001). Notably, PBF significantly mediated the association between HL and hypertension (indirect effect, OR = 0.99; 95%CI = 0.98–0.99; p = 0.009; percent mediated = 8.56%). The mediating roles of BMI and VF were not found.ConclusionThe prevalence of hypertension was relatively high. People with better HL were less likely to have hypertension. The association between HL and hypertension was partially explained by PBF. Strategic approaches are required to improve people's HL and body fat which further help to manage hypertension in rural and suburban areas.

  18. Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Needs Assessment, 2023-2024

    • data.sfgov.org
    • catalog.data.gov
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Aug 5, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    SF Department of Public Health (2025). Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Needs Assessment, 2023-2024 [Dataset]. https://data.sfgov.org/Health-and-Social-Services/Maternal-Child-and-Adolescent-Health-Needs-Assessm/iqtk-etij
    Explore at:
    xlsx, csv, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 5, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    San Francisco Department of Public Health
    Authors
    SF Department of Public Health
    Description

    SUMMARY This table contains data about women, ages 15 to 50, pregnant people, infants, children, and youths, up to age 24. It contains information about a wide range of health topics, including medical conditions, nutrition, dehydration, oral health, mental health, safety, access to health care, and basic needs, like housing. Local, county-level prevalence rates, time trends, and health disparities about national public health priorities, including preterm birth, infant death, childhood obesity, adolescent depression and substance use, and high blood pressure, diabetes, and kidney disease in young adults.

    The population data is from the 2023-2024 San Francisco Maternal Child and Adolescent Health needs assessment and is published on the Open Data Portal to share with community partners, plan services, and promote health.

    For more information see:

  19. Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Homepage
  20. Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health Reports

    HOW THE DATASET IS CREATED The Maternal, Child, and Adolescent Health (MCAH) Needs Assessment for San Francisco included review of a wide range of citywide population data covering a ten-year span, from 2014 to 2023. Data from over 83,000 birth records, 59,000 death records, 261,000 emergency room visits, 66,000 hospital admissions, and 90,000 newborn screening discharges were gathered, along with citywide data from child welfare records, health screenings in childcare and schools, DMV records of first-time drivers, school surveys, and a state-run mailed survey of recent births (California Department of Public Health MIHA survey). The datasets provided information about approximately 700 health conditions. Each health condition was described in terms of the number of people affected or cases, and the rate affected, stratified by age, sex, race-ethnicity, insurance status, zip code, and time period.

    Rates were calculated by dividing the number of people or events by the population group estimate (e.g., total births or census estimates), then multiplying by 100 or 1,000 depending on the measure. Each rate was presented with its 95% confidence interval to support users to compare any two rates, either between groups or over time. Two rates differ “significantly” if their 95% confidence intervals do not overlap.

    The present dataset summarizes the group-level results for any age-, sex-, race-, insurance-, zip code-, and/or period-specific group that included at least 20 people or cases.

    Causes of death, health conditions that affected over 1000 people in the time frame, problems that got worse over time, and health disparities by insurance, race-ethnicity and/or zip code were flagged for the MCAH Needs Assessment.

    UPDATE PROCESS The dataset will be updated manually, bi-annually, each December and June.

    HOW TO USE THIS DATASET Population data from the MCAH needs assessment are shared in several formats, including aggregated datasets on DataSF.gov, downloadable PDF summary reports by age group, interactive online visualizations, data tables, trend graphs, and maps. Information about each variable is available in a linked data dictionary. The definition of each numerator and denominator depends on data source, life stage, and time. Health conditions may not be directly comparable across life stage, if the numerator definition includes age- or pregnancy-specific diagnosis codes (e.g. diabetes hospitalization).

    For small groups or rare conditions, consider combining time periods and/or groups. Data are suppressed if fewer than 20 cases happened in the group and period.

    Group-specific rates are available if the matched group-specific census estimates (denominator) were available. Census estimates are only available for selected age-sex-race-, age-sex-zip code-, or age-sex-insurance-specific groups. Hospital records reflect what each clinician documented as relevant for the hospital encounter. No diagnosis does not rule out the presence of a condition unnoticed. Hospital and ER visit data reflect how many people had the condition vs. unknown. Rates may not be directly comparable across time and place, because data collection protocol may not be complete or standardized across data entry staff, time, and place.

    Multiple statistical comparisons may lead to false positives. Some statistically significant results may be significant only by chance. Observational data do not support causal inference and are only meant to flag topics for deeper discussion and investigation. Consider alternative explanations for the data, including chance and potential sources of error.

  • D

    Blood Pressure Monitoring Testing Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jan 7, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Blood Pressure Monitoring Testing Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/blood-pressure-monitoring-testing-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, pdf, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 7, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Blood Pressure Monitoring Testing Market Outlook



    The global blood pressure monitoring testing market size is projected to witness significant growth, expanding from USD 2.5 billion in 2023 to USD 4.7 billion by 2032, reflecting a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 7.2%. The driving factors behind this robust growth include increasing prevalence of hypertension, technological advancements in blood pressure monitoring devices, and rising awareness about the importance of regular health check-ups.



    One of the primary growth factors for the blood pressure monitoring testing market is the rising prevalence of hypertension globally. Hypertension is a major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, which remain the leading cause of mortality worldwide. As lifestyles become increasingly sedentary and diets less healthy, the incidence of hypertension is expected to rise further. This, in turn, drives the demand for efficient and reliable blood pressure monitoring devices, contributing to market growth.



    Technological advancements in blood pressure monitoring devices are another pivotal factor driving market expansion. Innovations such as digital blood pressure monitors, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring systems, and wearable devices have made it easier for individuals to monitor their blood pressure regularly. These advancements ensure greater accuracy, ease of use, and timely detection of hypertension, thereby encouraging more people to adopt blood pressure monitoring practices.



    Additionally, the increasing awareness about the importance of regular health check-ups plays a crucial role in driving the market. Governments and health organizations worldwide are continuously promoting the benefits of regular blood pressure monitoring as a preventive measure against cardiovascular diseases. Enhanced awareness campaigns and educational programs are encouraging individuals to take proactive steps in monitoring their health, further boosting the demand for blood pressure monitoring devices.



    A Blood Pressure Checker is an essential tool for individuals looking to maintain their cardiovascular health. These devices, which range from simple manual sphygmomanometers to advanced digital monitors, allow users to regularly check their blood pressure levels at home or on the go. This accessibility is crucial, as it enables early detection of hypertension and other related conditions, allowing for timely medical intervention. With the rise of digital health technologies, many blood pressure checkers now come equipped with features such as Bluetooth connectivity and integration with smartphone apps, providing users with a comprehensive view of their health data over time. This technological integration not only enhances user engagement but also facilitates better communication with healthcare providers, ensuring more personalized and effective management of blood pressure-related health issues.



    From a regional perspective, North America holds the largest share in the blood pressure monitoring testing market, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The high prevalence of hypertension, well-established healthcare infrastructure, and early adoption of advanced technologies contribute to North America's dominant position. Meanwhile, the Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest CAGR during the forecast period, driven by a large patient population, increasing healthcare expenditure, and growing awareness about hypertension management.



    Product Type Analysis



    The blood pressure monitoring testing market is segmented by product type into digital blood pressure monitors, aneroid blood pressure monitors, ambulatory blood pressure monitors, blood pressure transducers, and others. Each of these product types offers unique features and benefits, catering to various user needs and preferences, thereby driving market growth.



    Digital blood pressure monitors are gaining significant traction due to their ease of use, accuracy, and advanced features such as data storage and connectivity with mobile apps. These monitors allow individuals to track their blood pressure over time, facilitating better management of hypertension. The growing trend of home healthcare and the increasing preference for self-monitoring devices are expected to fuel the demand for digital blood pressure monitors in the coming years.



    Aneroid blood pressure monitors, though less advanced than their digital counterparts,

  • f

    DataSheet_1_Effectiveness of Remotely Delivered Interventions to...

    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    Updated May 9, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Drovandi, Aaron; Crowley, Benjamin J.; Fernando, Malindu E.; Seng, Leonard; Golledge, Jonathan (2022). DataSheet_1_Effectiveness of Remotely Delivered Interventions to Simultaneously Optimize Management of Hypertension, Hyperglycemia and Dyslipidemia in People With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.docx [Dataset]. https://datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov/dataset?q=0000374664
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 9, 2022
    Authors
    Drovandi, Aaron; Crowley, Benjamin J.; Fernando, Malindu E.; Seng, Leonard; Golledge, Jonathan
    Description

    BackgroundRemotely delivered interventions may be more efficient in controlling multiple risk factors in people with diabetes.PurposeTo pool evidence from randomized controlled trials testing remote management interventions to simultaneously control blood pressure, blood glucose and lipids.Data SourcesPubMed/Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) until 20th June 2021.Study SelectionIncluded RCTs were those that reported participant data on blood pressure, blood glucose, and lipid outcomes in response to a remotely delivered intervention.Data ExtractionThree authors extracted data using a predefined template. Primary outcomes were glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP & DBP). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane collaboration RoB-2 tool. Meta-analyses are reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).Data SynthesisTwenty-seven RCTs reporting on 9100 participants (4581 intervention and 4519 usual care) were included. Components of the remote management interventions tested were identified as patient education, risk factor monitoring, coaching on monitoring, consultations, and pharmacological management. Comparator groups were typically face-to-face usual patient care. Remote management significantly reduced HbA1c (SMD -0.25, 95%CI -0.33 to -0.17, p<0.001), TC (SMD -0.17, 95%CI -0.29 to -0.04, p<0.0001), LDL-c (SMD -0.11, 95%CI -0.19 to -0.03, p=0.006), SBP (SMD -0.11, 95%CI -0.18 to -0.04, p=0.001) and DBP (SMD -0.09, 95%CI -0.16 to -0.02, p=0.02), with low to moderate heterogeneity (I²= 0 to 75). Twelve trials had high risk of bias, 12 had some risk and three were at low risk of bias.LimitationsHeterogeneity and potential publication bias may limit applicability of findings.ConclusionsRemote management significantly improves control of modifiable risk factors.Systematic Review Registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=258433], identifier PROSPERO (CRD42021258433).

  • Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    NITISH SINGHAL (2022). Blood_pressure_data_India_2021_Statewise [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/nitishsinghal/blood-pressure-data-india-2021-statewise
    Organization logo

    Blood_pressure_data_India_2021_Statewise

    Indian Men and Women Blood pressure data. MILD |MODERATE|ELEVATED

    Explore at:
    zip(13287 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 17, 2022
    Authors
    NITISH SINGHAL
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Area covered
    India
    Description

    THIS DATA CONTAINS % OF MEN AND WOMEN ABOVE AGE 15 YRS WHO ARE DIAGNOSED WITH ** ||||||||||||| MILD | MODERATE|ELEVATED||||||||||||||

    ** May 17th is observed as World Hypertension Day every year with the aim to raise awareness about prevention, detection, and control of high blood pressure. The theme for this year is “Know Your Numbers” which is to raise awareness about the importance of knowing your blood pressure readings. Hypertension or high blood pressure is one of the key controllable risk factors of chronic health problems such as heart disease and stroke. According to the National Family Health Survey in 2017, one in eight Indians suffer from hypertension which translates to 207 million people (men 112 million, women 95 million). In India, high blood pressure is one of the leading causes of premature deaths. The Global Burden of Diseases study reported that hypertension led to 1.63 million deaths in India in 2016[1]. It is directly responsible for 57% stroke and 24% of coronary heart disease deaths in India

    Search
    Clear search
    Close search
    Google apps
    Main menu