100+ datasets found
  1. Big data and business analytics market share worldwide 2021, by country

    • statista.com
    Updated Aug 17, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2021). Big data and business analytics market share worldwide 2021, by country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1258046/worldwide-big-data-business-analytics-market-share-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 17, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2021, the United States is the leading country in the big data and business analytics (BDA) market, with 51 percent market share. The following four leading counties all hover around 5 percent market share. Global BDA spending is forecast to reach almost 216 billion U.S. dollars in 2021, with the majority to be spent on IT services and software.

  2. Leading countries by number of data centers 2025

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 21, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Leading countries by number of data centers 2025 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1228433/data-centers-worldwide-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 21, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    As of March 2025, there were a reported 5,426 data centers in the United States, the most of any country worldwide. A further 529 were located in Germany, while 523 were located in the United Kingdom. What is a data center? A data center is a network of computing and storage resources that enables the delivery of shared software applications and data. These facilities can house large amounts of critical and important data, and therefore are vital to the daily functions of companies and consumers alike. As a result, whether it is a cloud, colocation, or managed service, data center real estate will have increasing importance worldwide. Hyperscale data centers In the past, data centers were highly controlled physical infrastructures, but the cloud has since changed that model. A cloud data service is a remote version of a data center – located somewhere away from a company's physical premises. Cloud IT infrastructure spending has grown and is forecast to rise further in the coming years. The evolution of technology, along with the rapid growth in demand for data across the globe, is largely driven by the leading hyperscale data center providers.

  3. Large Scale International Boundaries

    • catalog.data.gov
    • geodata.state.gov
    Updated Feb 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of State (Point of Contact) (2025). Large Scale International Boundaries [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/large-scale-international-boundaries
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 28, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of Statehttp://state.gov/
    Description

    Overview The Office of the Geographer and Global Issues at the U.S. Department of State produces the Large Scale International Boundaries (LSIB) dataset. The current edition is version 11.4 (published 24 February 2025). The 11.4 release contains updated boundary lines and data refinements designed to extend the functionality of the dataset. These data and generalized derivatives are the only international boundary lines approved for U.S. Government use. The contents of this dataset reflect U.S. Government policy on international boundary alignment, political recognition, and dispute status. They do not necessarily reflect de facto limits of control. National Geospatial Data Asset This dataset is a National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDAID 194) managed by the Department of State. It is a part of the International Boundaries Theme created by the Federal Geographic Data Committee. Dataset Source Details Sources for these data include treaties, relevant maps, and data from boundary commissions, as well as national mapping agencies. Where available and applicable, the dataset incorporates information from courts, tribunals, and international arbitrations. The research and recovery process includes analysis of satellite imagery and elevation data. Due to the limitations of source materials and processing techniques, most lines are within 100 meters of their true position on the ground. Cartographic Visualization The LSIB is a geospatial dataset that, when used for cartographic purposes, requires additional styling. The LSIB download package contains example style files for commonly used software applications. The attribute table also contains embedded information to guide the cartographic representation. Additional discussion of these considerations can be found in the Use of Core Attributes in Cartographic Visualization section below. Additional cartographic information pertaining to the depiction and description of international boundaries or areas of special sovereignty can be found in Guidance Bulletins published by the Office of the Geographer and Global Issues: https://hiu.state.gov/data/cartographic_guidance_bulletins/ Contact Direct inquiries to internationalboundaries@state.gov. Direct download: https://data.geodata.state.gov/LSIB.zip Attribute Structure The dataset uses the following attributes divided into two categories: ATTRIBUTE NAME | ATTRIBUTE STATUS CC1 | Core CC1_GENC3 | Extension CC1_WPID | Extension COUNTRY1 | Core CC2 | Core CC2_GENC3 | Extension CC2_WPID | Extension COUNTRY2 | Core RANK | Core LABEL | Core STATUS | Core NOTES | Core LSIB_ID | Extension ANTECIDS | Extension PREVIDS | Extension PARENTID | Extension PARENTSEG | Extension These attributes have external data sources that update separately from the LSIB: ATTRIBUTE NAME | ATTRIBUTE STATUS CC1 | GENC CC1_GENC3 | GENC CC1_WPID | World Polygons COUNTRY1 | DoS Lists CC2 | GENC CC2_GENC3 | GENC CC2_WPID | World Polygons COUNTRY2 | DoS Lists LSIB_ID | BASE ANTECIDS | BASE PREVIDS | BASE PARENTID | BASE PARENTSEG | BASE The core attributes listed above describe the boundary lines contained within the LSIB dataset. Removal of core attributes from the dataset will change the meaning of the lines. An attribute status of “Extension” represents a field containing data interoperability information. Other attributes not listed above include “FID”, “Shape_length” and “Shape.” These are components of the shapefile format and do not form an intrinsic part of the LSIB. Core Attributes The eight core attributes listed above contain unique information which, when combined with the line geometry, comprise the LSIB dataset. These Core Attributes are further divided into Country Code and Name Fields and Descriptive Fields. County Code and Country Name Fields “CC1” and “CC2” fields are machine readable fields that contain political entity codes. These are two-character codes derived from the Geopolitical Entities, Names, and Codes Standard (GENC), Edition 3 Update 18. “CC1_GENC3” and “CC2_GENC3” fields contain the corresponding three-character GENC codes and are extension attributes discussed below. The codes “Q2” or “QX2” denote a line in the LSIB representing a boundary associated with areas not contained within the GENC standard. The “COUNTRY1” and “COUNTRY2” fields contain the names of corresponding political entities. These fields contain names approved by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN) as incorporated in the ‘"Independent States in the World" and "Dependencies and Areas of Special Sovereignty" lists maintained by the Department of State. To ensure maximum compatibility, names are presented without diacritics and certain names are rendered using common cartographic abbreviations. Names for lines associated with the code "Q2" are descriptive and not necessarily BGN-approved. Names rendered in all CAPITAL LETTERS denote independent states. Names rendered in normal text represent dependencies, areas of special sovereignty, or are otherwise presented for the convenience of the user. Descriptive Fields The following text fields are a part of the core attributes of the LSIB dataset and do not update from external sources. They provide additional information about each of the lines and are as follows: ATTRIBUTE NAME | CONTAINS NULLS RANK | No STATUS | No LABEL | Yes NOTES | Yes Neither the "RANK" nor "STATUS" fields contain null values; the "LABEL" and "NOTES" fields do. The "RANK" field is a numeric expression of the "STATUS" field. Combined with the line geometry, these fields encode the views of the United States Government on the political status of the boundary line. A value of “1” in the “RANK” field corresponds to an "International Boundary" value in the “STATUS” field. Values of ”2” and “3” correspond to “Other Line of International Separation” and “Special Line,” respectively. The “LABEL” field contains required text to describe the line segment on all finished cartographic products, including but not limited to print and interactive maps. The “NOTES” field contains an explanation of special circumstances modifying the lines. This information can pertain to the origins of the boundary lines, limitations regarding the purpose of the lines, or the original source of the line. Use of Core Attributes in Cartographic Visualization Several of the Core Attributes provide information required for the proper cartographic representation of the LSIB dataset. The cartographic usage of the LSIB requires a visual differentiation between the three categories of boundary lines. Specifically, this differentiation must be between: - International Boundaries (Rank 1); - Other Lines of International Separation (Rank 2); and - Special Lines (Rank 3). Rank 1 lines must be the most visually prominent. Rank 2 lines must be less visually prominent than Rank 1 lines. Rank 3 lines must be shown in a manner visually subordinate to Ranks 1 and 2. Where scale permits, Rank 2 and 3 lines must be labeled in accordance with the “Label” field. Data marked with a Rank 2 or 3 designation does not necessarily correspond to a disputed boundary. Please consult the style files in the download package for examples of this depiction. The requirement to incorporate the contents of the "LABEL" field on cartographic products is scale dependent. If a label is legible at the scale of a given static product, a proper use of this dataset would encourage the application of that label. Using the contents of the "COUNTRY1" and "COUNTRY2" fields in the generation of a line segment label is not required. The "STATUS" field contains the preferred description for the three LSIB line types when they are incorporated into a map legend but is otherwise not to be used for labeling. Use of the “CC1,” “CC1_GENC3,” “CC2,” “CC2_GENC3,” “RANK,” or “NOTES” fields for cartographic labeling purposes is prohibited. Extension Attributes Certain elements of the attributes within the LSIB dataset extend data functionality to make the data more interoperable or to provide clearer linkages to other datasets. The fields “CC1_GENC3” and “CC2_GENC” contain the corresponding three-character GENC code to the “CC1” and “CC2” attributes. The code “QX2” is the three-character counterpart of the code “Q2,” which denotes a line in the LSIB representing a boundary associated with a geographic area not contained within the GENC standard. To allow for linkage between individual lines in the LSIB and World Polygons dataset, the “CC1_WPID” and “CC2_WPID” fields contain a Universally Unique Identifier (UUID), version 4, which provides a stable description of each geographic entity in a boundary pair relationship. Each UUID corresponds to a geographic entity listed in the World Polygons dataset. These fields allow for linkage between individual lines in the LSIB and the overall World Polygons dataset. Five additional fields in the LSIB expand on the UUID concept and either describe features that have changed across space and time or indicate relationships between previous versions of the feature. The “LSIB_ID” attribute is a UUID value that defines a specific instance of a feature. Any change to the feature in a lineset requires a new “LSIB_ID.” The “ANTECIDS,” or antecedent ID, is a UUID that references line geometries from which a given line is descended in time. It is used when there is a feature that is entirely new, not when there is a new version of a previous feature. This is generally used to reference countries that have dissolved. The “PREVIDS,” or Previous ID, is a UUID field that contains old versions of a line. This is an additive field, that houses all Previous IDs. A new version of a feature is defined by any change to the feature—either line geometry or attribute—but it is still conceptually the same feature. The “PARENTID” field

  4. T

    LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE by Country Dataset

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated May 27, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2017). LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE by Country Dataset [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/long-term-unemployment-rate
    Explore at:
    xml, csv, excel, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 27, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    World
    Description

    This dataset provides values for LONG TERM UNEMPLOYMENT RATE reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

  5. Large Scale International Boundaries (LSIB)

    • data.amerigeoss.org
    shp
    Updated Jan 17, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    UN Humanitarian Data Exchange (2024). Large Scale International Boundaries (LSIB) [Dataset]. https://data.amerigeoss.org/dataset/large-scale-international-boundaries-lsib
    Explore at:
    shp(46321649)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 17, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United Nationshttp://un.org/
    Description

    Large Scale International Boundaries

    Version 11.1 Release Date: August 22, 2022

    Overview

    The Office of the Geographer and Global Issues at the U.S. Department of State produces the Large Scale International Boundaries (LSIB) dataset. These data and their derivatives are the only international boundary lines approved for U.S. Government use. They reflect U.S. Government policy, and not necessarily de facto limits of control. This dataset is a National Geospatial Data Asset.

    Details

    Sources for these data include treaties, relevant maps, and data from boundary commissions and national mapping agencies. Where available, the dataset incorporates information from courts, tribunals, and international arbitrations. The research and recovery of the data involves analysis of satellite imagery and elevation data. Due to the limitations of source materials and processing techniques, most lines are within 100 meters of their true position on the ground.

    Attributes

    The dataset uses the following attributes: Attribute Name Explanation Country Code Country-level codes are from the Geopolitical Entities, Names, and Codes Standard (GENC). The Q2 code denotes a line representing a boundary associated with an area not in GENC. Country Names Names approved by the U.S. Board on Geographic Names (BGN). Names for lines associated with a Q2 code are descriptive and are not necessarily BGN-approved. Label Required text label for the line segment where scale permits Rank/Status Rank 1: International Boundary Rank 2: Other Line of International Separation Rank 3: Special Line Notes Explanation of any applicable special circumstances Cartographic Usage Depiction of the LSIB requires a visual differentiation between the three categories of boundaries: International Boundaries (Rank 1), Other Lines of International Separation (Rank 2), and Special Lines (Rank 3). Rank 1 lines must be the most visually prominent. Rank 2 lines must be less visually prominent than Rank 1 lines. Rank 3 lines must be shown in a manner visually subordinate to Ranks 1 and 2. Where scale permits, Rank 2 and 3 lines must be labeled in accordance with the “Label” field. Data marked with a Rank 2 or 3 designation does not necessarily correspond to a disputed boundary. Additional cartographic information can be found in Guidance Bulletins (https://hiu.state.gov/data/cartographic_guidance_bulletins/) published by the Office of the Geographer and Global Issues. Please direct inquiries to internationalboundaries@state.gov.

    Credits

    The lines in the LSIB dataset are the product of decades of collaboration between geographers at the Department of State and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency with contributions from the Central Intelligence Agency and the UK Defence Geographic Centre. Attribution is welcome: U.S. Department of State, Office of the Geographer and Global Issues.

    Changes from Prior Release

    This version of the LSIB contains changes and accuracy refinements for the following line segments. These changes reflect improvements in spatial accuracy derived from newly available source materials, an ongoing review process, or the publication of new treaties or agreements. Changes to lines include: • Akrotiri (UK) / Cyprus • Albania / Montenegro • Albania / Greece • Albania / North Macedonia • Armenia / Turkey • Austria / Czechia • Austria / Slovakia • Austria / Hungary • Austria / Slovenia • Austria / Germany • Austria / Italy • Austria / Switzerland • Azerbaijan / Turkey • Azerbaijan / Iran • Belarus / Latvia • Belarus / Russia • Belarus / Ukraine • Belarus / Poland • Bhutan / India • Bhutan / China • Bulgaria / Turkey • Bulgaria / Romania • Bulgaria / Serbia • Bulgaria / Romania • China / Tajikistan • China / India • Croatia / Slovenia • Croatia / Hungary • Croatia / Serbia • Croatia / Montenegro • Czechia / Slovakia • Czechia / Poland • Czechia / Germany • Finland / Russia • Finland / Norway • Finland / Sweden • France / Italy • Georgia / Turkey • Germany / Poland • Germany / Switzerland • Greece / North Macedonia • Guyana / Suriname • Hungary / Slovenia • Hungary / Serbia • Hungary / Romania • Hungary / Ukraine • Iran / Turkey • Iraq / Turkey • Italy / Slovenia • Italy / Switzerland • Italy / Vatican City • Italy / San Marino • Kazakhstan / Russia • Kazakhstan / Uzbekistan • Kosovo / north Macedonia • Kosovo / Serbia • Kyrgyzstan / Tajikistan • Kyrgyzstan / Uzbekistan • Latvia / Russia • Latvia / Lithuania • Lithuania / Poland • Lithuania / Russia • Moldova / Ukraine • Moldova / Romania • Norway / Russia • Norway / Sweden • Poland / Russia • Poland / Ukraine • Poland / Slovakia • Romania / Ukraine • Romania / Serbia • Russia / Ukraine • Syria / Turkey • Tajikistan / Uzbekistan

    This release also contains topology fixes, land boundary terminus refinements, and tripoint adjustments.

    Copyright Notice and Disclaimer

    While U.S. Government works prepared by employees of the U.S. Government as part of their official duties are not subject to Federal copyright protection (see 17 U.S.C. § 105), copyrighted material incorporated in U.S. Government works retains its copyright protection. The works on or made available through download from the U.S. Department of State’s website may not be used in any manner that infringes any intellectual property rights or other proprietary rights held by any third party. Use of any copyrighted material beyond what is allowed by fair use or other exemptions may require appropriate permission from the relevant rightsholder. With respect to works on or made available through download from the U.S. Department of State’s website, neither the U.S. Government nor any of its agencies, employees, agents, or contractors make any representations or warranties—express, implied, or statutory—as to the validity, accuracy, completeness, or fitness for a particular purpose; nor represent that use of such works would not infringe privately owned rights; nor assume any liability resulting from use of such works; and shall in no way be liable for any costs, expenses, claims, or demands arising out of use of such works.

  6. Esri Data & Maps

    • datacore-gn.unepgrid.ch
    ogc:wms +1
    Updated Apr 30, 2011
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    International Boundaries Polygons Level 0 - ESRI (2011). Esri Data & Maps [Dataset]. https://datacore-gn.unepgrid.ch/geonetwork/srv/api/records/bf950e93-8157-4e8e-ab97-01ed6ca5fad5
    Explore at:
    www:link-1.0-http--link, ogc:wmsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Apr 30, 2011
    Dataset provided by
    Esrihttp://esri.com/
    Time period covered
    2014
    Area covered
    Antarctica, Antarctic Ice shield
    Description

    World Countries is a detailed dataset of country level boundaries which can be used at both large and small scales. It has been designed to be used as a basemap and includes an additional Disputed Boundaries layer that can be used to edit boundaries to fit a users needs and view of the political world.

    Included are attributes for local and official names and country codes, along with continent and display fields. Particularly useful are the Land_Type and Land_Rank fields which separate polygons based on their size. These attributes can be used for rendering at different scales by providing the ability to turn off small islands which may clutter small scale views.

  7. Share of companies using data analytics in CEE 2023, by country

    • statista.com
    Updated Oct 30, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Share of companies using data analytics in CEE 2023, by country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1385447/cee-big-data-use-in-enterprises-by-country/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 30, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    2023
    Area covered
    CEE
    Description

    Hungary had the largest share of enterprises using data analytics among Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries, at over 53 percent in 2023. To compare, in Romania, around 22 percent of businesses used data analytics tools.

  8. o

    Geonames - All Cities with a population > 1000

    • public.opendatasoft.com
    • data.smartidf.services
    • +3more
    csv, excel, geojson +1
    Updated Mar 10, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2024). Geonames - All Cities with a population > 1000 [Dataset]. https://public.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/geonames-all-cities-with-a-population-1000/
    Explore at:
    csv, json, geojson, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 10, 2024
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    All cities with a population > 1000 or seats of adm div (ca 80.000)Sources and ContributionsSources : GeoNames is aggregating over hundred different data sources. Ambassadors : GeoNames Ambassadors help in many countries. Wiki : A wiki allows to view the data and quickly fix error and add missing places. Donations and Sponsoring : Costs for running GeoNames are covered by donations and sponsoring.Enrichment:add country name

  9. o

    Big Country Cross Street Data in Shepherdsville, KY

    • ownerly.com
    Updated Dec 8, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Ownerly (2021). Big Country Cross Street Data in Shepherdsville, KY [Dataset]. https://www.ownerly.com/ky/shepherdsville/big-country-home-details
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 8, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Ownerly
    Area covered
    Shepherdsville, Kentucky
    Description

    This dataset provides information about the number of properties, residents, and average property values for Big Country cross streets in Shepherdsville, KY.

  10. a

    National boundaries

    • hub.arcgis.com
    • hub-worldpop.opendata.arcgis.com
    Updated Apr 26, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    WorldPop (2020). National boundaries [Dataset]. https://hub.arcgis.com/documents/c34bcd90a98a4191bf342e387f1be4a5
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Apr 26, 2020
    Dataset authored and provided by
    WorldPop
    Description

    The dataset is available to download in Geotiff format at a resolution of 3 arc-second (approximately 100m at the equator). The projection is Geographic Coordinate System, WGS84. Grid cell values represent International Standard 3-digit numerical ISO 3166 Country Codes corresponding to country and territory names as designated by the United Nations (ISO, 2017). It is important to note that these data are not official representations of country boundaries, some of which are disputed, but simply represent the source of the population count data.Data Source: Global national level input population data-summaryMethodology: Lloyd, C. T., H. Chamberlain, D. Kerr, G. Yetman, L. Pistolesi, F. R. Stevens, A. E. Gaughan, J. J. Nieves, G. Hornby, K. MacManus, P. Sinha, M. Bondarenko, A. Sorichetta, and A. J. Tatem, 2019. “Global Spatio-temporally Harmonised Datasets for Producing High-resolution Gridded Population Distribution Datasets”. Big Earth Data (https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2019.1625151).

  11. T

    NET LONG TERM TIC FLOWS by Country in AMERICA

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Jun 13, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2017). NET LONG TERM TIC FLOWS by Country in AMERICA [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/net-long-term-tic-flows?continent=america
    Explore at:
    xml, csv, json, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 13, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This dataset provides values for NET LONG TERM TIC FLOWS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

  12. o

    Country Codes

    • dark-big-header-alternative-theme-discovery.opendatasoft.com
    • data.smartidf.services
    • +7more
    csv, excel, geojson +1
    Updated Aug 25, 2015
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2015). Country Codes [Dataset]. https://dark-big-header-alternative-theme-discovery.opendatasoft.com/explore/dataset/countries-codespublic/
    Explore at:
    csv, geojson, json, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 25, 2015
    License

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domainhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain

    Description

    Country codes: ISO 2ISO 3UNLANGLABEL (EN, FR, SP)

  13. k

    Europe Big Data as a Service Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By...

    • kbvresearch.com
    Updated Oct 16, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    KBV Research (2024). Europe Big Data as a Service Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report By Deployment (Public Cloud, Hybrid Cloud, and Private Cloud), By Solution, By Enterprise Size, By End Use, By Country and Growth Forecast, 2024 - 2031 [Dataset]. https://www.kbvresearch.com/europe-big-data-as-a-service-market/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Oct 16, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    KBV Research
    License

    https://www.kbvresearch.com/privacy-policy/https://www.kbvresearch.com/privacy-policy/

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2031
    Area covered
    Europe
    Description

    The Europe Big Data as a Service Market would witness market growth of 19.1% CAGR during the forecast period (2024-2031). The Germany market dominated the Europe Big Data as a Service Market by Country in 2023, and would continue to be a dominant market till 2031; thereby, achieving a market value

  14. T

    NET LONG TERM TIC FLOWS by Country in ASIA

    • tradingeconomics.com
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated May 29, 2017
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2017). NET LONG TERM TIC FLOWS by Country in ASIA [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/country-list/net-long-term-tic-flows?continent=asia
    Explore at:
    json, csv, xml, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    2025
    Area covered
    Asia
    Description

    This dataset provides values for NET LONG TERM TIC FLOWS reported in several countries. The data includes current values, previous releases, historical highs and record lows, release frequency, reported unit and currency.

  15. Leading countries by number of data centers 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 19, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Petroc Taylor (2024). Leading countries by number of data centers 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1464/big-data/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 19, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Petroc Taylor
    Description

    As of March 2024, there were a reported 5,381 data centers in the United States, the most of any country worldwide. A further 521 were located in Germany, while 514 were located in the United Kingdom. What is a data center? A data center is a network of computing and storage resources that enables the delivery of shared software applications and data. These centers can house large amounts of critical and important data, and therefore are vital to the daily functions of companies and consumers alike. As a result, whether it is a cloud, colocation, or managed service, data center real estate will have increasing importance worldwide. Hyperscale data centers In the past, data centers were highly controlled physical infrastructures, but the cloud has since changed that model. A cloud data service is a remote version of a data center – located somewhere away from a company's physical premises. Cloud IT infrastructure spending has grown and is forecast to rise further in the coming years. The evolution of technology, along with the rapid growth in demand for data across the globe, is largely driven by the leading hyperscale data center providers.

  16. Treasury International Capital (TIC) - U.S. Transactions with Foreign...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +2more
    Updated Dec 1, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of the Treasury (2023). Treasury International Capital (TIC) - U.S. Transactions with Foreign Residents in Long Term Securities Gross Foreign Purchases and Sales, by country grand total [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/treasury-international-capital-tic-u-s-transactions-with-foreign-residents-in-long-term-se-4ff80
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Department of the Treasuryhttps://treasury.gov/
    Description

    Foreign purchases and sales of long-term domestic and foreign securities by type. Data column titles correspond to column titles in Treasury Bulletin Table CM-VI-4, excluding CM-VI-4 columns (1) and (8). All Countries and IROs (99996) All amounts in millions of dollars.

  17. F

    OECD based Recession Indicators for Four Big European Countries from the...

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Dec 9, 2022
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2022). OECD based Recession Indicators for Four Big European Countries from the Peak through the Trough [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/4BIGEURORECDM
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Dec 9, 2022
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-citation-requiredhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-citation-required

    Area covered
    Europe
    Description

    Graph and download economic data for OECD based Recession Indicators for Four Big European Countries from the Peak through the Trough (4BIGEURORECDM) from 1960-02-01 to 2022-08-31 about 4 Big European Countries, peak, trough, and recession indicators.

  18. Z

    Dataset for: "Big data suggest strong constraints of linguistic similarity...

    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • zenodo.org
    Updated Jan 24, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    T. Florian Jaeger (2020). Dataset for: "Big data suggest strong constraints of linguistic similarity on adult language learning" [Dataset]. https://data.niaid.nih.gov/resources?id=zenodo_2863532
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 24, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    Job Schepens
    Roeland van Hout
    T. Florian Jaeger
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset is adapted from raw data with fully anonymized results on the State Examination of Dutch as a Second Language. This exam is officially administred by the Board of Tests and Examinations (College voor Toetsen en Examens, or CvTE). See cvte.nl/about-cvte. The Board of Tests and Examinations is mandated by the Dutch government.

    The article accompanying the dataset:

    Schepens, Job, Roeland van Hout, and T. Florian Jaeger. “Big Data Suggest Strong Constraints of Linguistic Similarity on Adult Language Learning.” Cognition 194 (January 1, 2020): 104056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104056.

    Every row in the dataset represents the first official testing score of a unique learner. The columns contain the following information as based on questionnaires filled in at the time of the exam:

    "L1" - The first language of the learner "C" - The country of birth "L1L2" - The combination of first and best additional language besides Dutch "L2" - The best additional language besides Dutch "AaA" - Age at Arrival in the Netherlands in years (starting date of residence) "LoR" - Length of residence in the Netherlands in years "Edu.day" - Duration of daily education (1 low, 2 middle, 3 high, 4 very high). From 1992 until 2006, learners' education has been measured by means of a side-by-side matrix question in a learner's questionnaire. Learners were asked to mark which type of education they have had (elementary, secondary, or tertiary schooling) by means of filling in for how many years they have been enrolled, in which country, and whether or not they have graduated. Based on this information we were able to estimate how many years learners have had education on a daily basis from six years of age onwards. Since 2006, the question about learners' education has been altered and it is asked directly how many years learners have had formal education on a daily basis from six years of age onwards. Possible answering categories are: 1) 0 thru 5 years; 2) 6 thru 10 years; 3) 11 thru 15 years; 4) 16 years or more. The answers have been merged into the categorical answer. "Sex" - Gender "Family" - Language Family "ISO639.3" - Language ID code according to Ethnologue "Enroll" - Proportion of school-aged youth enrolled in secondary education according to the World Bank. The World Bank reports on education data in a wide number of countries around the world on a regular basis. We took the gross enrollment rate in secondary schooling per country in the year the learner has arrived in the Netherlands as an indicator for a country's educational accessibility at the time learners have left their country of origin. "STEX_speaking_score" - The STEX test score for speaking proficiency. "Dissimilarity_morphological" - Morphological similarity "Dissimilarity_lexical" - Lexical similarity "Dissimilarity_phonological_new_features" - Phonological similarity (in terms of new features) "Dissimilarity_phonological_new_categories" - Phonological similarity (in terms of new sounds)

    A few rows of the data:

    "L1","C","L1L2","L2","AaA","LoR","Edu.day","Sex","Family","ISO639.3","Enroll","STEX_speaking_score","Dissimilarity_morphological","Dissimilarity_lexical","Dissimilarity_phonological_new_features","Dissimilarity_phonological_new_categories" "English","UnitedStates","EnglishMonolingual","Monolingual",34,0,4,"Female","Indo-European","eng ",94,541,0.0094,0.083191,11,19 "English","UnitedStates","EnglishGerman","German",25,16,3,"Female","Indo-European","eng ",94,603,0.0094,0.083191,11,19 "English","UnitedStates","EnglishFrench","French",32,3,4,"Male","Indo-European","eng ",94,562,0.0094,0.083191,11,19 "English","UnitedStates","EnglishSpanish","Spanish",27,8,4,"Male","Indo-European","eng ",94,537,0.0094,0.083191,11,19 "English","UnitedStates","EnglishMonolingual","Monolingual",47,5,3,"Male","Indo-European","eng ",94,505,0.0094,0.083191,11,19

  19. U

    United States Foreign LT Sec: UH: FB: Other Countries: New Zealand

    • ceicdata.com
    Updated Aug 9, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CEICdata.com (2020). United States Foreign LT Sec: UH: FB: Other Countries: New Zealand [Dataset]. https://www.ceicdata.com/en/united-states/foreign-long-term-securities-by-us-holders-by-country/foreign-lt-sec-uh-fb-other-countries-new-zealand
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2020
    Dataset provided by
    CEICdata.com
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    May 1, 2017 - Apr 1, 2018
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    United States Foreign LT Sec: UH: FB: Other Countries: New Zealand data was reported at 11.177 USD bn in Apr 2018. This records a decrease from the previous number of 11.449 USD bn for Mar 2018. United States Foreign LT Sec: UH: FB: Other Countries: New Zealand data is updated monthly, averaging 10.621 USD bn from Dec 2011 (Median) to Apr 2018, with 77 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 11.804 USD bn in Feb 2015 and a record low of 8.688 USD bn in Aug 2013. United States Foreign LT Sec: UH: FB: Other Countries: New Zealand data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by US Department of Treasury. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.Z046: Foreign Long Term Securities by US Holders: By Country.

  20. d

    Replication Data for The Complex Crises Database: 70 years of Macroeconomic...

    • search.dataone.org
    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated Nov 13, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Betin, Manuel; Umberto Collodel (2023). Replication Data for The Complex Crises Database: 70 years of Macroeconomic Crises [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/OCSCVL
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 13, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Betin, Manuel; Umberto Collodel
    Description

    .xlsx file for the replication of the Paper The Complex Crises Database: 70 years of Macroeconomic Crises. It contains the term frequencies of 20 crises sentiment indexes computed from the IMF country report for the period 1956-2016 for 181 countries. (2021-07-02)

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2021). Big data and business analytics market share worldwide 2021, by country [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1258046/worldwide-big-data-business-analytics-market-share-by-country/
Organization logo

Big data and business analytics market share worldwide 2021, by country

Explore at:
5 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Aug 17, 2021
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Time period covered
2021
Area covered
Worldwide
Description

In 2021, the United States is the leading country in the big data and business analytics (BDA) market, with 51 percent market share. The following four leading counties all hover around 5 percent market share. Global BDA spending is forecast to reach almost 216 billion U.S. dollars in 2021, with the majority to be spent on IT services and software.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu