The Synthea generated data is provided here as a 1,000 person (1k), 100,000 person (100k), and 2,800,000 persom (2.8m) data sets in the OMOP Common Data Model format. SyntheaTM is a synthetic patient generator that models the medical history of synthetic patients. Our mission is to output high-quality synthetic, realistic but not real, patient data and associated health records covering every aspect of healthcare. The resulting data is free from cost, privacy, and security restrictions. It can be used without restriction for a variety of secondary uses in academia, research, industry, and government (although a citation would be appreciated). You can read our first academic paper here: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx079
https://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/3.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/GD5XWEhttps://dataverse.harvard.edu/api/datasets/:persistentId/versions/3.0/customlicense?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/GD5XWE
This dataset contains Synthea synthetic patient data used in building ML models for lung cancer risk prediction. The ML models are used to simulate ML-enabled LHS. This open dataset is part of the synthetic data repository of the Open LHS project on GitHub: https://github.com/lhs-open/synthetic-data. For data source and methods, see the first ML-LHS simulation paper published in Nature Scientific Reports: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-23011-4.
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
These RDF triples are the result of modeling electronic health care records synthesized with Synthea software and can be loaded into a triplestore. The following abstract comes from a paper, describing the semantic instantiation process, and submitted to the ICBO 2019 conference.
ABSTRACT: There is ample literature on the semantic modeling of biomedical data in general, but less has been published on realism-based, semantic instantiation of electronic health records (EHR). Reasons include difficult design decisions and issues of data governance. A collaborative approach can address design and technology utilization issues, but is especially constrained by limited access to the data at hand: protected health information.
Effective collaboration can be facilitated by public EHR-like data sets, which would ideally include a large variety of datatypes mirroring actual EHRs and enough records to drive a performance assessment. An investment into reading public EHR-like data from a popular common data model (CDM) is preferable over reading each public data set’s native format.
In addition to identifying suitable public EHR-like data sets and CDMs, this paper addresses instantiation via relational-to-RDF mapping. The completed instantiation is available for download, and a competency question demonstrates fidelity across all discussed formats.
The dataset has 2 populations of Synthea synthetic patients generated by Synthea tool. Each population has 15K patients with original medical records in CSV files. Because the total file size is >3GB in each population, the files are compressed in zip file. Synthea records are in domains similar to those in real EMR, including patients, encounters, conditions (diagnosis), observations, medications, and procedures. The data was first used in building ML models for lung cancer risk prediction. For more information, see the published paper in Nature Scientific Reports (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-23011-4)
CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
License information was derived automatically
These RDF triples (synthea_graph_exportable.nq.zip) are the result of modeling electronic health records (synthea_csv_output_turbo_cannonical.zip), that were synthesized with the Synthea software (https://github.com/synthetichealth/synthea). Anyone who loads them into a triplestore database is encouraged to provide feedback at https://github.com/PennTURBO/EhrGraphCollab/issues. The following abstract comes from a paper, describing the semantic instantiation process, and presented to the ICBO 2019 conference (https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eYXTBl75Wx3XPMmCIOZba-8Cv0DIhlRq/view).
ABSTRACT: There is ample literature on the semantic modeling of biomedical data in general, but less has been published on realism-based, semantic instantiation of electronic health records (EHR). Reasons include difficult design decisions and issues of data governance. A collaborative approach can address design and technology utilization issues, but is especially constrained by limited access to the data at hand: protected health information.
Effective collaboration can be facilitated by public EHR-like data sets, which would ideally include a large variety of datatypes mirroring actual EHRs and enough records to drive a performance assessment. An investment into reading public EHR-like data from a popular common data model (CDM) is preferable over reading each public data set’s native format.
In addition to identifying suitable public EHR-like data sets and CDMs, this paper addresses instantiation via relational-to-RDF mapping. The completed instantiation is available for download, and a competency question demonstrates fidelity across all discussed formats.
Not seeing a result you expected?
Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.
The Synthea generated data is provided here as a 1,000 person (1k), 100,000 person (100k), and 2,800,000 persom (2.8m) data sets in the OMOP Common Data Model format. SyntheaTM is a synthetic patient generator that models the medical history of synthetic patients. Our mission is to output high-quality synthetic, realistic but not real, patient data and associated health records covering every aspect of healthcare. The resulting data is free from cost, privacy, and security restrictions. It can be used without restriction for a variety of secondary uses in academia, research, industry, and government (although a citation would be appreciated). You can read our first academic paper here: https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocx079