12 datasets found
  1. T

    United States GDP Growth Rate

    • tradingeconomics.com
    • zh.tradingeconomics.com
    • +13more
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Aug 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). United States GDP Growth Rate [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth
    Explore at:
    json, excel, csv, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jun 30, 1947 - Jun 30, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the United States expanded 3.30 percent in the second quarter of 2025 over the previous quarter. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States GDP Growth Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

  2. F

    Gross Domestic Product

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    • trends.sourcemedium.com
    json
    Updated Aug 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Gross Domestic Product [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDP
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 28, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    View economic output, reported as the nominal value of all new goods and services produced by labor and property located in the U.S.

  3. Number of global social network users 2017-2028

    • statista.com
    • es.statista.com
    • +1more
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Stacy Jo Dixon, Number of global social network users 2017-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/topics/1164/social-networks/
    Explore at:
    Dataset provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Authors
    Stacy Jo Dixon
    Description

    How many people use social media?

                  Social media usage is one of the most popular online activities. In 2024, over five billion people were using social media worldwide, a number projected to increase to over six billion in 2028.
    
                  Who uses social media?
                  Social networking is one of the most popular digital activities worldwide and it is no surprise that social networking penetration across all regions is constantly increasing. As of January 2023, the global social media usage rate stood at 59 percent. This figure is anticipated to grow as lesser developed digital markets catch up with other regions
                  when it comes to infrastructure development and the availability of cheap mobile devices. In fact, most of social media’s global growth is driven by the increasing usage of mobile devices. Mobile-first market Eastern Asia topped the global ranking of mobile social networking penetration, followed by established digital powerhouses such as the Americas and Northern Europe.
    
                  How much time do people spend on social media?
                  Social media is an integral part of daily internet usage. On average, internet users spend 151 minutes per day on social media and messaging apps, an increase of 40 minutes since 2015. On average, internet users in Latin America had the highest average time spent per day on social media.
    
                  What are the most popular social media platforms?
                  Market leader Facebook was the first social network to surpass one billion registered accounts and currently boasts approximately 2.9 billion monthly active users, making it the most popular social network worldwide. In June 2023, the top social media apps in the Apple App Store included mobile messaging apps WhatsApp and Telegram Messenger, as well as the ever-popular app version of Facebook.
    
  4. f

    Life Expectancy with and without Cognitive Impairment in Seven Latin...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    tiff
    Updated Jun 1, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Kimberly Ashby-Mitchell; Carol Jagger; Tony Fouweather; Kaarin J. Anstey (2023). Life Expectancy with and without Cognitive Impairment in Seven Latin American and Caribbean Countries [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121867
    Explore at:
    tiffAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 1, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Kimberly Ashby-Mitchell; Carol Jagger; Tony Fouweather; Kaarin J. Anstey
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Latin America, Caribbean
    Description

    BackgroundThe rising prevalence of cognitive impairment is an increasing challenge with the ageing of our populations but little is known about the burden in low- and middle- income Latin American and Caribbean countries (LAC) that are aging more rapidly than their developed counterparts. We examined life expectancies with cognitive impairment (CILE) and free of cognitive impairment (CIFLE) in seven developing LAC countries.MethodsData from The Survey on Health, Well-being and Ageing in LAC (N = 10,597) was utilised and cognitive status was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The Sullivan Method was applied to estimate CILE and CIFLE. Logistic regression was used to determine the effect of age, gender and education on cognitive outcome. Meta-regression models were fitted for all 7 countries together to investigate the relationship between CIFLE and education in men and women at age 60.ResultsThe prevalence of CI increased with age in all countries except Uruguay and with a significant gender effect observed only in Mexico where men had lower odds of CI compared to women [OR = 0.464 95% CInt (0.268 – 0.806)]. Low education was associated with increased prevalence of CI in Brazil [OR = 4.848 (1.173–20.044)], Chile [OR = 3.107 (1.098–8.793), Cuba [OR = 2.295 (1.247–4.225)] and Mexico [OR = 3.838 (1.368–10.765). For males, total life expectancy (TLE) at age 60 was highest in Cuba (19.7 years) and lowest in Brazil and Uruguay (17.6 years). TLE for females at age 60 was highest for Chileans (22.8 years) and lowest for Brazilians (20.2 years). CIFLE for men was greatest in Cuba (19.0 years) and least in Brazil (16.7 years). These differences did not appear to be explained by educational level (Men: p = 0.408, women: p = 0.695).ConclusionIncreasing age, female sex and low education were associated with higher CI in LAC reflecting patterns found in other countries.

  5. Datasets for: Resilience or Catastrophe? A possible state change for monarch...

    • zenodo.org
    • datadryad.org
    bin
    Updated Jun 4, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Elizabeth Crone; Cheryl Schultz; Elizabeth Crone; Cheryl Schultz (2022). Datasets for: Resilience or Catastrophe? A possible state change for monarch butterflies in western North America [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.fqz612jsb
    Explore at:
    binAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Elizabeth Crone; Cheryl Schultz; Elizabeth Crone; Cheryl Schultz
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In the western United States, the population of migratory monarch butterflies is on the brink of collapse, having dropped from several million butterflies in the 1980's to ~2000 butterflies in the winter of 2020-21. At the same time, a resident (non-migratory) monarch butterfly population in urban gardens has been growing in abundance. The new resident population is not sufficient to make up for the loss of the migratory population; there are still orders of magnitude fewer butterflies now than in the recent past. The resident population also probably lacks the demographic capacity to expand its range inland during summer months. Nonetheless, the resident population may have the capacity to persist. This sudden change emphasizes the extent to which environmental change can have unexpected consequences, and how quickly these changes can happen. We hope it will provoke discussion about how we define resilience and viability in changing environments.

  6. Death in the United States

    • kaggle.com
    zip
    Updated Aug 3, 2017
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017). Death in the United States [Dataset]. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/cdc/mortality
    Explore at:
    zip(766333584 bytes)Available download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 3, 2017
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    License

    https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Every year the CDC releases the country’s most detailed report on death in the United States under the National Vital Statistics Systems. This mortality dataset is a record of every death in the country for 2005 through 2015, including detailed information about causes of death and the demographic background of the deceased.

    It's been said that "statistics are human beings with the tears wiped off." This is especially true with this dataset. Each death record represents somebody's loved one, often connected with a lifetime of memories and sometimes tragically too short.

    Putting the sensitive nature of the topic aside, analyzing mortality data is essential to understanding the complex circumstances of death across the country. The US Government uses this data to determine life expectancy and understand how death in the U.S. differs from the rest of the world. Whether you’re looking for macro trends or analyzing unique circumstances, we challenge you to use this dataset to find your own answers to one of life’s great mysteries.

    Overview

    This dataset is a collection of CSV files each containing one year's worth of data and paired JSON files containing the code mappings, plus an ICD 10 code set. The CSVs were reformatted from their original fixed-width file formats using information extracted from the CDC's PDF manuals using this script. Please note that this process may have introduced errors as the text extracted from the pdf is not a perfect match. If you have any questions or find errors in the preparation process, please leave a note in the forums. We hope to publish additional years of data using this method soon.

    A more detailed overview of the data can be found here. You'll find that the fields are consistent within this time window, but some of data codes change every few years. For example, the 113_cause_recode entry 069 only covers ICD codes (I10,I12) in 2005, but by 2015 it covers (I10,I12,I15). When I post data from years prior to 2005, expect some of the fields themselves to change as well.

    All data comes from the CDC’s National Vital Statistics Systems, with the exception of the Icd10Code, which are sourced from the World Health Organization.

    Project ideas

    • The CDC's mortality data was the basis of a widely publicized paper, by Anne Case and Nobel prize winner Angus Deaton, arguing that middle-aged whites are dying at elevated rates. One of the criticisms against the paper is that it failed to properly account for the exact ages within the broad bins available through the CDC's WONDER tool. What do these results look like with exact/not-binned age data?
    • Similarly, how sensitive are the mortality trends being discussed in the news to the choice of bin-widths?
    • As noted above, the data preparation process could have introduced errors. Can you find any discrepancies compared to the aggregate metrics on WONDER? If so, please let me know in the forums!
    • WONDER is cited in numerous economics, sociology, and public health research papers. Can you find any papers whose conclusions would be altered if they used the exact data available here rather than binned data from Wonder?

    Differences from the first version of the dataset

    • This version of the dataset was prepared in a completely different many. This has allowed us to provide a much larger volume of data and ensure that codes are available for every field.
    • We've replaced the batch of sql files with a single JSON per year. Kaggle's platform currently offer's better support for JSON files, and this keeps the number of files manageable.
    • A tutorial kernel providing a quick introduction to the new format is available here.
    • Lastly, I apologize if the transition has interrupted anyone's work! If need be, you can still download v1.
  7. F

    Data from: Personal Saving Rate

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Aug 29, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Personal Saving Rate [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Aug 29, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Personal Saving Rate (PSAVERT) from Jan 1959 to Jul 2025 about savings, personal, rate, and USA.

  8. Global retail e-commerce sales 2022-2028

    • statista.com
    • jpproxy.snakexgc.com
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Global retail e-commerce sales 2022-2028 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/379046/worldwide-retail-e-commerce-sales/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Feb 2025
    Area covered
    Worldwide
    Description

    In 2024, global retail e-commerce sales reached an estimated ************ U.S. dollars. Projections indicate a ** percent growth in this figure over the coming years, with expectations to come close to ************** dollars by 2028. World players Among the key players on the world stage, the American marketplace giant Amazon holds the title of the largest e-commerce player globally, with a gross merchandise value of nearly *********** U.S. dollars in 2024. Amazon was also the most valuable retail brand globally, followed by mostly American competitors such as Walmart and the Home Depot. Leading e-tailing regions E-commerce is a dormant channel globally, but nowhere has it been as successful as in Asia. In 2024, the e-commerce revenue in that continent alone was measured at nearly ************ U.S. dollars, outperforming the Americas and Europe. That year, the up-and-coming e-commerce markets also centered around Asia. The Philippines and India stood out as the swiftest-growing e-commerce markets based on online sales, anticipating a growth rate surpassing ** percent.

  9. T

    United States Unemployment Rate

    • tradingeconomics.com
    • pt.tradingeconomics.com
    • +13more
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Sep 5, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). United States Unemployment Rate [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate
    Explore at:
    excel, xml, csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 5, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 31, 1948 - Aug 31, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Unemployment Rate in the United States increased to 4.30 percent in August from 4.20 percent in July of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Unemployment Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

  10. d

    Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Case Tracker

    • data.world
    csv, zip
    Updated Sep 22, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    The Associated Press (2025). Johns Hopkins COVID-19 Case Tracker [Dataset]. https://data.world/associatedpress/johns-hopkins-coronavirus-case-tracker
    Explore at:
    zip, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 22, 2025
    Authors
    The Associated Press
    Time period covered
    Jan 22, 2020 - Mar 9, 2023
    Area covered
    Description

    Updates

    • Notice of data discontinuation: Since the start of the pandemic, AP has reported case and death counts from data provided by Johns Hopkins University. Johns Hopkins University has announced that they will stop their daily data collection efforts after March 10. As Johns Hopkins stops providing data, the AP will also stop collecting daily numbers for COVID cases and deaths. The HHS and CDC now collect and visualize key metrics for the pandemic. AP advises using those resources when reporting on the pandemic going forward.

    • April 9, 2020

      • The population estimate data for New York County, NY has been updated to include all five New York City counties (Kings County, Queens County, Bronx County, Richmond County and New York County). This has been done to match the Johns Hopkins COVID-19 data, which aggregates counts for the five New York City counties to New York County.
    • April 20, 2020

      • Johns Hopkins death totals in the US now include confirmed and probable deaths in accordance with CDC guidelines as of April 14. One significant result of this change was an increase of more than 3,700 deaths in the New York City count. This change will likely result in increases for death counts elsewhere as well. The AP does not alter the Johns Hopkins source data, so probable deaths are included in this dataset as well.
    • April 29, 2020

      • The AP is now providing timeseries data for counts of COVID-19 cases and deaths. The raw counts are provided here unaltered, along with a population column with Census ACS-5 estimates and calculated daily case and death rates per 100,000 people. Please read the updated caveats section for more information.
    • September 1st, 2020

      • Johns Hopkins is now providing counts for the five New York City counties individually.
    • February 12, 2021

      • The Ohio Department of Health recently announced that as many as 4,000 COVID-19 deaths may have been underreported through the state’s reporting system, and that the "daily reported death counts will be high for a two to three-day period."
      • Because deaths data will be anomalous for consecutive days, we have chosen to freeze Ohio's rolling average for daily deaths at the last valid measure until Johns Hopkins is able to back-distribute the data. The raw daily death counts, as reported by Johns Hopkins and including the backlogged death data, will still be present in the new_deaths column.
    • February 16, 2021

      - Johns Hopkins has reconciled Ohio's historical deaths data with the state.

      Overview

    The AP is using data collected by the Johns Hopkins University Center for Systems Science and Engineering as our source for outbreak caseloads and death counts for the United States and globally.

    The Hopkins data is available at the county level in the United States. The AP has paired this data with population figures and county rural/urban designations, and has calculated caseload and death rates per 100,000 people. Be aware that caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.

    This data is from the Hopkins dashboard that is updated regularly throughout the day. Like all organizations dealing with data, Hopkins is constantly refining and cleaning up their feed, so there may be brief moments where data does not appear correctly. At this link, you’ll find the Hopkins daily data reports, and a clean version of their feed.

    The AP is updating this dataset hourly at 45 minutes past the hour.

    To learn more about AP's data journalism capabilities for publishers, corporations and financial institutions, go here or email kromano@ap.org.

    Queries

    Use AP's queries to filter the data or to join to other datasets we've made available to help cover the coronavirus pandemic

    Interactive

    The AP has designed an interactive map to track COVID-19 cases reported by Johns Hopkins.

    @(https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/15/)

    Interactive Embed Code

    <iframe title="USA counties (2018) choropleth map Mapping COVID-19 cases by county" aria-describedby="" id="datawrapper-chart-nRyaf" src="https://datawrapper.dwcdn.net/nRyaf/10/" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" style="width: 0; min-width: 100% !important;" height="400"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">(function() {'use strict';window.addEventListener('message', function(event) {if (typeof event.data['datawrapper-height'] !== 'undefined') {for (var chartId in event.data['datawrapper-height']) {var iframe = document.getElementById('datawrapper-chart-' + chartId) || document.querySelector("iframe[src*='" + chartId + "']");if (!iframe) {continue;}iframe.style.height = event.data['datawrapper-height'][chartId] + 'px';}}});})();</script>
    

    Caveats

    • This data represents the number of cases and deaths reported by each state and has been collected by Johns Hopkins from a number of sources cited on their website.
    • In some cases, deaths or cases of people who've crossed state lines -- either to receive treatment or because they became sick and couldn't return home while traveling -- are reported in a state they aren't currently in, because of state reporting rules.
    • In some states, there are a number of cases not assigned to a specific county -- for those cases, the county name is "unassigned to a single county"
    • This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University's COVID-19 tracking project. The AP is simply making it available here for ease of use for reporters and members.
    • Caseloads may reflect the availability of tests -- and the ability to turn around test results quickly -- rather than actual disease spread or true infection rates.
    • Population estimates at the county level are drawn from 2014-18 5-year estimates from the American Community Survey.
    • The Urban/Rural classification scheme is from the Center for Disease Control and Preventions's National Center for Health Statistics. It puts each county into one of six categories -- from Large Central Metro to Non-Core -- according to population and other characteristics. More details about the classifications can be found here.

    Johns Hopkins timeseries data - Johns Hopkins pulls data regularly to update their dashboard. Once a day, around 8pm EDT, Johns Hopkins adds the counts for all areas they cover to the timeseries file. These counts are snapshots of the latest cumulative counts provided by the source on that day. This can lead to inconsistencies if a source updates their historical data for accuracy, either increasing or decreasing the latest cumulative count. - Johns Hopkins periodically edits their historical timeseries data for accuracy. They provide a file documenting all errors in their timeseries files that they have identified and fixed here

    Attribution

    This data should be credited to Johns Hopkins University COVID-19 tracking project

  11. D

    Artificial Intelligence in Regtech Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025...

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Sep 12, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Regtech Market Report | Global Forecast From 2025 To 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/global-artificial-intelligence-in-regtech-market
    Explore at:
    pptx, csv, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 12, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Artificial Intelligence in Regtech Market Outlook



    The global Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Regtech market size was valued at approximately USD 7.8 billion in 2023 and is projected to reach around USD 34.5 billion by 2032, growing at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 18.3% during the forecast period. This robust growth is attributed to increasing regulatory scrutiny and the subsequent need for efficient compliance solutions. The market's expansion is reinforced by technological advancements in AI, which are enhancing the capabilities of Regtech solutions to address the ever-evolving regulatory landscape.



    One of the primary growth factors driving the AI in Regtech market is the increasing complexity of regulatory requirements across various industries. Companies are continually faced with the challenge of staying compliant with a multitude of regulations that differ from country to country. This complexity necessitates the adoption of advanced technologies like AI to automate and streamline compliance processes. AI-powered Regtech solutions can analyze vast amounts of regulatory data and provide actionable insights, helping organizations mitigate risks and avoid costly penalties.



    Another significant growth driver is the rise in financial crimes such as money laundering, fraud, and identity theft. Traditional methods of combating these issues are often inadequate due to their manual nature and the sheer volume of data that needs to be processed. AI in Regtech offers sophisticated tools for real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and anomaly detection, enabling organizations to proactively identify and address fraudulent activities. Consequently, the increasing demand for robust fraud detection and prevention solutions is propelling market growth.



    The growing emphasis on operational efficiency and cost reduction is also contributing to the market's expansion. AI technologies can automate routine compliance tasks, reducing the need for extensive human intervention and thereby lowering operational costs. Moreover, AI-driven Regtech solutions can deliver faster and more accurate results, enhancing overall efficiency. Organizations are increasingly recognizing the value of these benefits, leading to higher adoption rates of AI in Regtech solutions.



    From a regional perspective, North America holds a significant share of the AI in Regtech market, driven by stringent regulatory frameworks and a high level of technological adoption. Europe is also a major market, owing to rigorous compliance requirements and strong financial sectors. The Asia Pacific region is expected to witness the highest growth rate during the forecast period, fueled by rapid digital transformation and increasing regulatory pressures in countries like China and India. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also emerging markets, with growing awareness and investment in Regtech solutions.



    Component Analysis



    In the AI in Regtech market, the component segment is categorized into software, hardware, and services. The software segment dominates the market due to the extensive adoption of AI-powered compliance and risk management solutions. These software solutions offer capabilities such as data analytics, machine learning, and natural language processing, which are crucial for automating regulatory processes. Companies are increasingly investing in AI-driven software to enhance their compliance frameworks and manage regulatory challenges more effectively.



    Hardware, though a smaller segment compared to software, plays a critical role in supporting the deployment of AI in Regtech solutions. High-performance computing hardware, such as GPUs and servers, is essential for running complex AI algorithms and processing large datasets. Organizations are investing in advanced hardware to ensure that their AI systems operate efficiently and deliver accurate results. The growth in cloud computing and edge computing technologies is also driving the demand for specialized hardware in the Regtech market.



    Services constitute a vital component of the AI in Regtech market, encompassing consulting, implementation, and support services. As organizations adopt AI-powered Regtech solutions, they often require expert guidance to integrate these technologies into their existing systems. Consulting services help companies understand their regulatory requirements and devise effective compliance strategies. Implementation services assist in deploying and customizing AI solutions, while support services ensure the ongoing maintenance and optimization of these sy

  12. T

    United States Balance of Trade

    • tradingeconomics.com
    • fr.tradingeconomics.com
    • +13more
    csv, excel, json, xml
    Updated Sep 4, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). United States Balance of Trade [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/balance-of-trade
    Explore at:
    json, excel, xml, csvAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Sep 4, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    TRADING ECONOMICS
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Time period covered
    Jan 31, 1950 - Jul 31, 2025
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The United States recorded a trade deficit of 78.31 USD Billion in July of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Balance of Trade - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

  13. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
TRADING ECONOMICS (2025). United States GDP Growth Rate [Dataset]. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth

United States GDP Growth Rate

United States GDP Growth Rate - Historical Dataset (1947-06-30/2025-06-30)

Explore at:
93 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
json, excel, csv, xmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Aug 28, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
TRADING ECONOMICS
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Time period covered
Jun 30, 1947 - Jun 30, 2025
Area covered
United States
Description

The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in the United States expanded 3.30 percent in the second quarter of 2025 over the previous quarter. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States GDP Growth Rate - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu