Use of JSATS can generate a large volume of data. To manage and visualize the data, an integrated suite of science-based tools known as the Hydropower Biological Evaluation Toolset (HBET) can be used.

ApacheJIT: A Large Dataset for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction

This archive contains the ApacheJIT dataset presented in the paper "ApacheJIT: A Large Dataset for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction" as well as the replication package. The paper is submitted to MSR 2022 Data Showcase Track.

The datasets are available under directory dataset. There are 4 datasets in this directory. 

1. apachejit_total.csv: This file contains the entire dataset. Commits are specified by their identifier and a set of commit metrics that are explained in the paper are provided as features. Column buggy specifies whether or not the commit introduced any bug into the system. 
2. apachejit_train.csv: This file is a subset of the entire dataset. It provides a balanced set that we recommend for models that are sensitive to class imbalance. This set is obtained from the first 14 years of data (2003 to 2016).
3. apachejit_test_large.csv: This file is a subset of the entire dataset. The commits in this file are the commits from the last 3 years of data. This set is not balanced to represent a real-life scenario in a JIT model evaluation where the model is trained on historical data to be applied on future data without any modification.
4. apachejit_test_small.csv: This file is a subset of the test file explained above. Since the test file has more than 30,000 commits, we also provide a smaller test set which is still unbalanced and from the last 3 years of data.

In addition to the dataset, we also provide the scripts using which we built the dataset. These scripts are written in Python 3.8. Therefore, Python 3.8 or above is required. To set up the environment, we have provided a list of required packages in file requirements.txt. Additionally, one filtering step requires GumTree [1]. For Java, GumTree requires Java 11. For other languages, external tools are needed. Installation guide and more details can be found here.

The scripts are comprised of Python scripts under directory src and Python notebooks under directory notebooks. The Python scripts are mainly responsible for conducting GitHub search via GitHub search API and collecting commits through PyDriller Package [2]. The notebooks link the fixed issue reports with their corresponding fixing commits and apply some filtering steps. The bug-inducing candidates then are filtered again using gumtree.py script that utilizes the GumTree package. Finally, the remaining bug-inducing candidates are combined with the clean commits in the dataset_construction notebook to form the entire dataset.

More specifically, git_token.py handles GitHub API token that is necessary for requests to GitHub API. Script collector.py performs GitHub search. Tracing changed lines and git annotate is done in gitminer.py using PyDriller. Finally, gumtree.py applies 4 filtering steps (number of lines, number of files, language, and change significance).

References:

1. GumTree

* https://github.com/GumTreeDiff/gumtree

Jean-Rémy Falleri, Floréal Morandat, Xavier Blanc, Matias Martinez, and Martin Monperrus. 2014. Fine-grained and accurate source code differencing. In ACM/IEEE International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, ASE ’14,Vasteras, Sweden - September 15 - 19, 2014. 313–324

2. PyDriller

* https://pydriller.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

* Davide Spadini, Maurício Aniche, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2018. PyDriller: Python Framework for Mining Software Repositories. In Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering(Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA)(ESEC/FSE2018). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 908–911

In this paper, we investigate the use of Bayesian networks to construct large-scale diagnostic systems. In particular, we consider the development of large-scale Bayesian networks by composition. This compositional approach reflects how (often redundant) subsystems are architected to form systems such as electrical power systems. We develop high-level specifications, Bayesian networks, clique trees, and arithmetic circuits representing 24 different electrical power systems. The largest among these 24 Bayesian networks contains over 1,000 random variables. Another BN represents the real-world electrical power system ADAPT, which is representative of electrical power systems deployed in aerospace vehicles. In addition to demonstrating the scalability of the compositional approach, we briefly report on experimental results from the diagnostic competition DXC, where the ProADAPT team, using techniques discussed here, obtained the highest scores in both Tier 1 (among 9 international competitors) and Tier 2 (among 6 international competitors) of the industrial track. While we consider diagnosis of power systems specically, we believe this work is relevant to other system health management problems, in particular in dependable systems such as aircraft and spacecraft. Reference: O. J. Mengshoel, S. Poll, and T. Kurtoglu. "Developing Large-Scale Bayesian Networks by Composition: Fault Diagnosis of Electrical Power Systems in Aircraft and Spacecraft." Proc. of the IJCAI-09 Workshop on Self-* and Autonomous Systems (SAS): Reasoning and Integration Challenges, 2009 BibTex Reference: @inproceedings{mengshoel09developing, title = {Developing Large-Scale {Bayesian} Networks by Composition: Fault Diagnosis of Electrical Power Systems in Aircraft and Spacecraft}, author = {Mengshoel, O. J. and Poll, S. and Kurtoglu, T.}, booktitle = {Proc. of the IJCAI-09 Workshop on Self-$\star$ and Autonomous Systems (SAS): Reasoning and Integration Challenges}, year={2009} }

Context :
We share a large database containing electroencephalographic signals from 87 human participants, with more than 20,800 trials in total representing about 70 hours of recording. It was collected during brain-computer interface (BCI) experiments and organized into 3 datasets (A, B, and C) that were all recorded following the same protocol: right and left hand motor imagery (MI) tasks during one single day session.
It includes the performance of the associated BCI users, detailed information about the demographics, personality and cognitive user’s profile, and the experimental instructions and codes (executed in the open-source platform OpenViBE).
Such database could prove useful for various studies, including but not limited to: 1) studying the relationships between BCI users' profiles and their BCI performances, 2) studying how EEG signals properties varies for different users' profiles and MI tasks, 3) using the large number of participants to design cross-user BCI machine learning algorithms or 4) incorporating users' profile information into the design of EEG signal classification algorithms.

Sixty participants (Dataset A) performed the first experiment, designed in order to investigated the impact of experimenters' and users' gender on MI-BCI user training outcomes, i.e., users performance and experience, (Pillette & al). Twenty one participants (Dataset B) performed the second one, designed to examined the relationship between users' online performance (i.e., classification accuracy) and the characteristics of the chosen user-specific Most Discriminant Frequency Band (MDFB) (Benaroch & al). The only difference between the two experiments lies in the algorithm used to select the MDFB. Dataset C contains 6 additional participants who completed one of the two experiments described above. Physiological signals were measured using a g.USBAmp (g.tec, Austria), sampled at 512 Hz, and processed online using OpenViBE 2.1.0 (Dataset A) & OpenVIBE 2.2.0 (Dataset B). For Dataset C, participants C83 and C85 were collected with OpenViBE 2.1.0 and the remaining 4 participants with OpenViBE 2.2.0. Experiments were recorded at Inria Bordeaux sud-ouest, France.

Duration : Each participant's folder is composed of approximately 48 minutes EEG recording. Meaning six 7-minutes runs and a 6-minutes baseline.

Documents
Instructions: checklist read by experimenters during the experiments.
Questionnaires: the Mental Rotation test used, the translation of 4 questionnaires, notably the Demographic and Social information, the Pre and Post-session questionnaires, and the Index of Learning style. English and french version
Performance: The online OpenViBE BCI classification performances obtained by each participant are provided for each run, as well as answers to all questionnaires
Scenarios/scripts : set of OpenViBE scenarios used to perform each of the steps of the MI-BCI protocol, e.g., acquire training data, calibrate the classifier or run the online MI-BCI

Database : raw signals
Dataset A : N=60 participants
Dataset B : N=21 participants
Dataset C : N=6 participants

We introduce a large-scale dataset of the complete texts of free/open source software (FOSS) license variants. To assemble it we have collected from the Software Heritage archive—the largest publicly available archive of FOSS source code with accompanying development history—all versions of files whose names are commonly used to convey licensing terms to software users and developers. The dataset consists of 6.5 million unique license files that can be used to conduct empirical studies on open source licensing, training of automated license classifiers, natural language processing (NLP) analyses of legal texts, as well as historical and phylogenetic studies on FOSS licensing. Additional metadata about shipped license files are also provided, making the dataset ready to use in various contexts; they include: file length measures, detected MIME type, detected SPDX license (using ScanCode), example origin (e.g., GitHub repository), oldest public commit in which the license appeared. The dataset is released as open data as an archive file containing all deduplicated license blobs, plus several portable CSV files for metadata, referencing blobs via cryptographic checksums.

For more details see the included README file and companion paper:

Stefano Zacchiroli. A Large-scale Dataset of (Open Source) License Text Variants. In proceedings of the 2022 Mining Software Repositories Conference (MSR 2022). 23-24 May 2022 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. ACM 2022.

If you use this dataset for research purposes, please acknowledge its use by citing the above paper.

Dataset

This dataset was created by Ian Dickerson

Contents

The USDA Agricultural Research Service (ARS) recently established SCINet , which consists of a shared high performance computing resource, Ceres, and the dedicated high-speed Internet2 network used to access Ceres. Current and potential SCINet users are using and generating very large datasets so SCINet needs to be provisioned with adequate data storage for their active computing. It is not designed to hold data beyond active research phases. At the same time, the National Agricultural Library has been developing the Ag Data Commons, a research data catalog and repository designed for public data release and professional data curation. Ag Data Commons needs to anticipate the size and nature of data it will be tasked with handling. The ARS Web-enabled Databases Working Group, organized under the SCINet initiative, conducted a study to establish baseline data storage needs and practices, and to make projections that could inform future infrastructure design, purchases, and policies. The SCINet Web-enabled Databases Working Group helped develop the survey which is the basis for an internal report. While the report was for internal use, the survey and resulting data may be generally useful and are being released publicly. From October 24 to November 8, 2016 we administered a 17-question survey (Appendix A) by emailing a Survey Monkey link to all ARS Research Leaders, intending to cover data storage needs of all 1,675 SY (Category 1 and Category 4) scientists. We designed the survey to accommodate either individual researcher responses or group responses. Research Leaders could decide, based on their unit's practices or their management preferences, whether to delegate response to a data management expert in their unit, to all members of their unit, or to themselves collate responses from their unit before reporting in the survey.
Larger storage ranges cover vastly different amounts of data so the implications here could be significant depending on whether the true amount is at the lower or higher end of the range. Therefore, we requested more detail from "Big Data users," those 47 respondents who indicated they had more than 10 to 100 TB or over 100 TB total current data (Q5). All other respondents are called "Small Data users." Because not all of these follow-up requests were successful, we used actual follow-up responses to estimate likely responses for those who did not respond. We defined active data as data that would be used within the next six months. All other data would be considered inactive, or archival. To calculate per person storage needs we used the high end of the reported range divided by 1 for an individual response, or by G, the number of individuals in a group response. For Big Data users we used the actual reported values or estimated likely values.

Resources in this dataset:Resource Title: Appendix A: ARS data storage survey questions. File Name: Appendix A.pdfResource Description: The full list of questions asked with the possible responses. The survey was not administered using this PDF but the PDF was generated directly from the administered survey using the Print option under Design Survey. Asterisked questions were required. A list of Research Units and their associated codes was provided in a drop down not shown here. Resource Software Recommended: Adobe Acrobat,url: https://get.adobe.com/reader/ Resource Title: CSV of Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Machine-readable survey response data.csvResource Description: CSV file includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed. This information is that same data as in the Excel spreadsheet (also provided).Resource Title: Responses from ARS Researcher Data Storage Survey. File Name: Data Storage Survey Data for public release.xlsxResource Description: MS Excel worksheet that Includes raw responses from the administered survey, as downloaded unfiltered from Survey Monkey, including incomplete responses. Also includes additional classification and calculations to support analysis. Individual email addresses and IP addresses have been removed.Resource Software Recommended: Microsoft Excel,url: https://products.office.com/en-us/excel

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Excel population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Excel. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Excel by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Excel.

Key observations

The largest age group in Excel, AL was for the group of age 45 to 49 years years with a population of 74 (15.64%), according to the ACS 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Excel, AL was the 85 years and over years with a population of 2 (0.42%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Excel is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Excel total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Excel Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Please cite the following paper when using this dataset:N. Thakur, "Twitter Big Data as a Resource for Exoskeleton Research: A Large-Scale Dataset of about 140,000 Tweets from 2017–2022 and 100 Research Questions", Journal of Analytics, Volume 1, Issue 2, 2022, pp. 72-97, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics1020007AbstractThe exoskeleton technology has been rapidly advancing in the recent past due to its multitude of applications and diverse use cases in assisted living, military, healthcare, firefighting, and industry 4.0. The exoskeleton market is projected to increase by multiple times its current value within the next two years. Therefore, it is crucial to study the degree and trends of user interest, views, opinions, perspectives, attitudes, acceptance, feedback, engagement, buying behavior, and satisfaction, towards exoskeletons, for which the availability of Big Data of conversations about exoskeletons is necessary. The Internet of Everything style of today’s living, characterized by people spending more time on the internet than ever before, with a specific focus on social media platforms, holds the potential for the development of such a dataset by the mining of relevant social media conversations. Twitter, one such social media platform, is highly popular amongst all age groups, where the topics found in the conversation paradigms include emerging technologies such as exoskeletons. To address this research challenge, this work makes two scientific contributions to this field. First, it presents an open-access dataset of about 140,000 Tweets about exoskeletons that were posted in a 5-year period from 21 May 2017 to 21 May 2022. Second, based on a comprehensive review of the recent works in the fields of Big Data, Natural Language Processing, Information Retrieval, Data Mining, Pattern Recognition, and Artificial Intelligence that may be applied to relevant Twitter data for advancing research, innovation, and discovery in the field of exoskeleton research, a total of 100 Research Questions are presented for researchers to study, analyze, evaluate, ideate, and investigate based on this dataset.

The purpose of the study was to quantify the effect of the embrace of DNA technology on offender behavior. In particular, researchers examined whether an offender's knowledge that their DNA profile was entered into a database deterred them from offending in the future and if probative effects resulted from DNA sampling. The researchers coded information using criminal history records and data from Florida's DNA database, both of which are maintained by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), and also utilized court docket information acquired through the Florida Department of Corrections (FDOC) to create a dataset of 156,702 cases involving offenders released from the FDOC in the state of Florida between January 1996 and December 2004. The data contain a total of 50 variables. Major categories of variables include demographic variables regarding the offender, descriptive variables relating to the initial crime committed by the offender, and time-specific variables regarding cases of recidivism.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Big Stone Gap population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Big Stone Gap. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Big Stone Gap by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Big Stone Gap.

Key observations

The largest age group in Big Stone Gap, VA was for the group of age 30 to 34 years years with a population of 602 (11.59%), according to the ACS 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Big Stone Gap, VA was the 85 years and over years with a population of 57 (1.10%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2019-2023 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Big Stone Gap is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Big Stone Gap total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Big Stone Gap Population by Age. You can refer the same here

The global big data and business analytics (BDA) market was valued at 168.8 billion U.S. dollars in 2018 and is forecast to grow to 215.7 billion U.S. dollars by 2021. In 2021, more than half of BDA spending will go towards services. IT services is projected to make up around 85 billion U.S. dollars, and business services will account for the remainder. Big data High volume, high velocity and high variety: one or more of these characteristics is used to define big data, the kind of data sets that are too large or too complex for traditional data processing applications. Fast-growing mobile data traffic, cloud computing traffic, as well as the rapid development of technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) all contribute to the increasing volume and complexity of data sets. For example, connected IoT devices are projected to generate 79.4 ZBs of data in 2025. Business analytics Advanced analytics tools, such as predictive analytics and data mining, help to extract value from the data and generate business insights. The size of the business intelligence and analytics software application market is forecast to reach around 16.5 billion U.S. dollars in 2022. Growth in this market is driven by a focus on digital transformation, a demand for data visualization dashboards, and an increased adoption of cloud.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the Big Flat population distribution across 18 age groups. It lists the population in each age group along with the percentage population relative of the total population for Big Flat. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population distribution of Big Flat by age. For example, using this dataset, we can identify the largest age group in Big Flat.

Key observations

The largest age group in Big Flat, AR was for the group of age 15 to 19 years years with a population of 16 (25%), according to the ACS 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates. At the same time, the smallest age group in Big Flat, AR was the 5 to 9 years years with a population of 0 (0%). Source: U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2018-2022 5-Year Estimates

Age groups:

• Under 5 years
• 5 to 9 years
• 10 to 14 years
• 15 to 19 years
• 20 to 24 years
• 25 to 29 years
• 30 to 34 years
• 35 to 39 years
• 40 to 44 years
• 45 to 49 years
• 50 to 54 years
• 55 to 59 years
• 60 to 64 years
• 65 to 69 years
• 70 to 74 years
• 75 to 79 years
• 80 to 84 years
• 85 years and over

Variables / Data Columns

• Age Group: This column displays the age group in consideration
• Population: The population for the specific age group in the Big Flat is shown in this column.
• % of Total Population: This column displays the population of each age group as a proportion of Big Flat total population. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for Big Flat Population by Age. You can refer the same here

Large Movie Review Dataset. This is a dataset for binary sentiment classification containing substantially more data than previous benchmark datasets. We provide a set of 25,000 highly polar movie reviews for training, and 25,000 for testing. There is additional unlabeled data for use as well.

To use this dataset:

import tensorflow_datasets as tfds

ds = tfds.load('imdb_reviews', split='train')
for ex in ds.take(4):
 print(ex)

See the guide for more informations on tensorflow_datasets.

This study engaged 409 participants over a period spanning from July 10 to August 8, 2023, ensuring representation across various demographic factors: 221 females, 186 males, 2 non-binary, year of birth between 1951 and 2005, with varied annual incomes and from 15 Spanish regions. The MobileWell400+ dataset, openly accessible, encompasses a wide array of data collected via the participants' mobile phone, including demographic, emotional, social, behavioral, and well-being data. Methodologically, the project presents a promising avenue for uncovering new social, behavioral, and emotional indicators, supplementing existing literature. Notably, artificial intelligence is considered to be instrumental in analysing these data, discerning patterns, and forecasting trends, thereby advancing our comprehension of individual and population well-being. Ethical standards were upheld, with participants providing informed consent.

The following is a non-exhaustive list of collected data:

Data continuously collected through the participants' smartphone sensors: physical activity (resting, walking, driving, cycling, etc.), name of detected WiFi networks, connectivity type (WiFi, mobile, none), ambient light, ambient noise, and status of the device screen (on, off, locked, unlocked).

Data corresponding to an initial survey prompted via the smartphone, with information related to demographic data, effects and COVID vaccination, average hours of physical activity, and answers to a series of questions to measure mental health, many of them taken from internationally recognised psychological and well-being scales (PANAS, PHQ, GAD, BRS and AAQ), social isolation (TILS) and economic inequality perception.

Data corresponding to daily surveys prompted via the smartphone, where variables related to mood (valence, activation, energy and emotional events) and social interaction (quantity and quality) are measured.

Data corresponding to weekly surveys prompted via the smartphone, where information on overall health, hours of physical activity per week, lonileness, and questions related to well-being are asked.

Data corresponding to an final survey prompted via the smartphone, consisting of similar questions to the ones asked in the initial survey, namely psychological and well-being items (PANAS, PHQ, GAD, BRS and AAQ), social isolation (TILS) and economic inequality perception questions.

For a more detailed description of the study please refer to MobileWell400+StudyDescription.pdf.

For a more detailed description of the collected data, variables and data files please refer to MobileWell400+FilesDescription.pdf.

The CLIVAR Large Ensemble repository was built at NCAR and supported by the US CLIVAR WG on Large Ensembles. It features a set of CMORized variables from the following CMIP5 ... class Large Ensembles: CANESM2, CESM, CSIRO MK36, EC Earth, GFDL CM3, GFDL ESM2M, MPI, and OLENS McKinnon.

• The dataset is gathered on Sep. 17th 2020. It has more than 5.4K Python repositories that are hosted on GitHub. Check out the file ManyTypes4PyDataset.spec for repositories URL and their commit SHA.
• The dataset is also de-duplicated using the CD4Py tool. The list of duplicate files is provided in duplicate_files.txt file.
• All of its Python projects are processed in JSON-formatted files. They contain a seq2seq representation of each file, type-related hints, and information for machine learning models. The structure of JSON-formatted files is described in JSONOutput.md file.
• The dataset is split into train, validation and test sets by source code files. The list of files and their corresponding set is provided in dataset_split.csv file.
• Notable changes to each version of the dataset are documented in CHANGELOG.md.

Studying how human drivers react differently when following autonomous vehicles (AV) vs. human-driven vehicles (HV) is critical for mixed traffic flow. This dataset contains extracted and enhanced two categories of car-following data, HV-following-AV (H-A) and HV-following-HV (H-H), from the open Lyft level-5 dataset.

This is data collected from 50 APIs on their usage among over 200,000 GitHub consumers.

Large go-around, also referred to as missed approach, data set. The data set is in support of the paper presented at the OpenSky Symposium on November the 10th.

If you use this data for a scientific publication, please consider citing our paper.

The data set contains landings from 176 (mostly) large airports from 44 different countries. The landings are labelled as performing a go-around (GA) or not. In total, the data set contains almost 9 million landings with more than 33000 GAs. The data was collected from OpenSky Network's historical data base for the year 2019. The published data set contains multiple files:

go_arounds_minimal.csv.gz

Compressed CSV containing the minimal data set. It contains a row for each landing and a minimal amount of information about the landing, and if it was a GA. The data is structured in the following way:

    Column name
    Type
    Description




    time
    date time
    UTC time of landing or first GA attempt


    icao24
    string
    Unique 24-bit (hexadecimal number) ICAO identifier of the aircraft concerned


    callsign
    string
    Aircraft identifier in air-ground communications


    airport
    string
    ICAO airport code where the aircraft is landing


    runway
    string
    Runway designator on which the aircraft landed


    has_ga
    string
    "True" if at least one GA was performed, otherwise "False"


    n_approaches
    integer
    Number of approaches identified for this flight


    n_rwy_approached
    integer
    Number of unique runways approached by this flight

The last two columns, n_approaches and n_rwy_approached, are useful to filter out training and calibration flight. These have usually a large number of n_approaches, so an easy way to exclude them is to filter by n_approaches > 2.

go_arounds_augmented.csv.gz

Compressed CSV containing the augmented data set. It contains a row for each landing and additional information about the landing, and if it was a GA. The data is structured in the following way:

    Column name
    Type
    Description




    time
    date time
    UTC time of landing or first GA attempt


    icao24
    string
    Unique 24-bit (hexadecimal number) ICAO identifier of the aircraft concerned


    callsign
    string
    Aircraft identifier in air-ground communications


    airport
    string
    ICAO airport code where the aircraft is landing


    runway
    string
    Runway designator on which the aircraft landed


    has_ga
    string
    "True" if at least one GA was performed, otherwise "False"


    n_approaches
    integer
    Number of approaches identified for this flight


    n_rwy_approached
    integer
    Number of unique runways approached by this flight


    registration
    string
    Aircraft registration


    typecode
    string
    Aircraft ICAO typecode


    icaoaircrafttype
    string
    ICAO aircraft type


    wtc
    string
    ICAO wake turbulence category


    glide_slope_angle
    float
    Angle of the ILS glide slope in degrees


    has_intersection

string

    Boolean that is true if the runway has an other runway intersecting it, otherwise false


    rwy_length
    float
    Length of the runway in kilometre


    airport_country
    string
    ISO Alpha-3 country code of the airport


    airport_region
    string
    Geographical region of the airport (either Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Africa, or Oceania)


    operator_country
    string
    ISO Alpha-3 country code of the operator


    operator_region
    string
    Geographical region of the operator of the aircraft (either Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Africa, or Oceania)


    wind_speed_knts
    integer
    METAR, surface wind speed in knots


    wind_dir_deg
    integer
    METAR, surface wind direction in degrees


    wind_gust_knts
    integer
    METAR, surface wind gust speed in knots


    visibility_m
    float
    METAR, visibility in m


    temperature_deg
    integer
    METAR, temperature in degrees Celsius


    press_sea_level_p
    float
    METAR, sea level pressure in hPa


    press_p
    float
    METAR, QNH in hPA


    weather_intensity
    list
    METAR, list of present weather codes: qualifier - intensity


    weather_precipitation
    list
    METAR, list of present weather codes: weather phenomena - precipitation


    weather_desc
    list
    METAR, list of present weather codes: qualifier - descriptor


    weather_obscuration
    list
    METAR, list of present weather codes: weather phenomena - obscuration


    weather_other
    list
    METAR, list of present weather codes: weather phenomena - other

This data set is augmented with data from various public data sources. Aircraft related data is mostly from the OpenSky Network's aircraft data base, the METAR information is from the Iowa State University, and the rest is mostly scraped from different web sites. If you need help with the METAR information, you can consult the WMO's Aerodrom Reports and Forecasts handbook.

go_arounds_agg.csv.gz

Compressed CSV containing the aggregated data set. It contains a row for each airport-runway, i.e. every runway at every airport for which data is available. The data is structured in the following way:

    Column name
    Type
    Description




    airport
    string
    ICAO airport code where the aircraft is landing


    runway
    string
    Runway designator on which the aircraft landed


    n_landings
    integer
    Total number of landings observed on this runway in 2019


    ga_rate
    float
    Go-around rate, per 1000 landings


    glide_slope_angle
    float
    Angle of the ILS glide slope in degrees


    has_intersection
    string
    Boolean that is true if the runway has an other runway intersecting it, otherwise false


    rwy_length
    float
    Length of the runway in kilometres


    airport_country
    string
    ISO Alpha-3 country code of the airport


    airport_region
    string
    Geographical region of the airport (either Europe, North America, South America, Asia, Africa, or Oceania)

This aggregated data set is used in the paper for the generalized linear regression model.

Downloading the trajectories

Users of this data set with access to OpenSky Network's Impala shell can download the historical trajectories from the historical data base with a few lines of Python code. For example, you want to get all the go-arounds of the 4th of January 2019 at London City Airport (EGLC). You can use the Traffic library for easy access to the database:

import datetime from tqdm.auto import tqdm import pandas as pd from traffic.data import opensky from traffic.core import Traffic

load minimum data set

df = pd.read_csv("go_arounds_minimal.csv.gz", low_memory=False) df["time"] = pd.to_datetime(df["time"])

select London City Airport, go-arounds, and 2019-01-04

airport = "EGLC" start = datetime.datetime(year=2019, month=1, day=4).replace( tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc ) stop = datetime.datetime(year=2019, month=1, day=5).replace( tzinfo=datetime.timezone.utc )

df_selection = df.query("airport==@airport & has_ga & (@start <= time <= @stop)")

iterate over flights and pull the data from OpenSky Network

flights = [] delta_time = pd.Timedelta(minutes=10) for _, row in tqdm(df_selection.iterrows(), total=df_selection.shape[0]): # take at most 10 minutes before and 10 minutes after the landing or go-around start_time = row["time"] - delta_time stop_time = row["time"] + delta_time

# fetch the data from OpenSky Network
flights.append(
  opensky.history(
    start=start_time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"),
    stop=stop_time.strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"),
    callsign=row["callsign"],
    return_flight=True,
  )
)

The flights can be converted into a Traffic object

Traffic.from_flights(flights)

Additional files

Additional files are available to check the quality of the classification into GA/not GA and the selection of the landing runway. These are:

validation_table.xlsx: This Excel sheet was manually completed during the review of the samples for each runway in the data set. It provides an estimate of the false positive and false negative rate of the go-around classification. It also provides an estimate of the runway misclassification rate when the airport has two or more parallel runways. The columns with the headers highlighted in red were filled in manually, the rest is generated automatically.

validation_sample.zip: For each runway, 8 batches of 500 randomly selected trajectories (or as many as available, if fewer than 4000) classified as not having a GA and up to 8 batches of 10 random landings, classified as GA, are plotted. This allows the interested user to visually inspect a random sample of the landings and go-arounds easily.