This dataset, released by DoD, contains geographic information for major installations, ranges, and training areas in the United States and its territories. This release integrates site information about DoD installations, training ranges, and land assets in a format which can be immediately put to work in commercial geospatial information systems. Homeland Security/Homeland Defense, law enforcement, and readiness planners will benefit from immediate access to DoD site location data during emergencies. Land use planning and renewable energy planning will also benefit from use of this data. Users are advised that the point and boundary location datasets are intended for planning purposes only, and do not represent the legal or surveyed land parcel boundaries.

SELECTED SOCIAL CHARACTERISTICS IN THE UNITED STATES VETERAN STATUS - DP02 Universe - Civilian population 18 Year and over Survey-Program - American Community Survey 5-year estimates Years - 2020, 2021, 2022 Veteran status is used to identify people with active duty military service and service in the military Reserves and the National Guard. Veterans are men and women who have served (even for a short time), but are not currently serving, on active duty in the U.S. Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, or the Coast Guard, or who served in the U.S. Merchant Marine during World War II. People who served in the National Guard or Reserves are classified as veterans only if they were ever called or ordered to active duty, not counting the 4-6 months for initial training or yearly summer camps.

This dataset displays the number of active duty personnel and their location, by country. Included in these figures are the numbers for Army, Navy, Marine, and Air Force branches of the United States Military. Note: this data includes rounded figures for personnel involved in Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF)and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF). This data was collected from the department of Defense directly at: http://siadapp.dmdc.osd.mil/personnel/MILITARY/history/hst0706.pdf .

The high prevalence of dual use of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco is a unique tobacco use behavior in the US military population. However, dual tobacco use has rarely been addressed in active duty populations. We aimed to identify factors contributing to dual tobacco use among active duty service members from Army and Air Force. We also compared age at initiation, duration of use, and amount of use between dual users and exclusive users. The study included 168 exclusive cigarette smokers, 171 exclusive smokeless tobacco users, and 110 dual users. In stepwise logistic regression, smokeless tobacco use among family members (OR = 4.78, 95% CI = 2.05–11.13 for father use vs. no use, OR = 3.39, 95% CI = 1.56–7.37 for other relatives use vs. no use), and deployment history (serving combat unit vs. combat support unit: OR = 4.12, 95% CI = 1.59–10.66; never deployed vs. combat support unit: OR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.45–7.61) were factors identified to be associated with dual use relative to exclusive cigarette smoking. Cigarette smoking among family members (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.07–3.60 for sibling smoking), high perception of harm using smokeless tobacco (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.29–4.26), secondhand smoke exposure (OR = 4.83, 95% CI = 2.73–8.55), and lower education (associated degree or some college: OR = 2.76, 95% CI = 1.01–7.51; high school of lower: OR = 4.10, 95% CI = 1.45–11.61) were factors associated with dual use relative to exclusive smokeless tobacco use. Compared to exclusive cigarette smokers, dual users started smoking at younger age, smoked cigarettes for longer period, and smoked more cigarettes per day. Our study addressed dual tobacco use behavior in military population and has implications to tobacco control programs in the military.

The United States Military Installations database contains the boundaries and location information for important military installations in the United States and Puerto Rico. The database includes records for 405 military installations. Source: National Transportation Atlas Database URL: http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_atlas_database/2006/

The 2012 US Army Anthropometric Survey (ANSUR II) was executed by the Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center (NSRDEC) from October 2010 to April 2012 and is comprised of personnel representing the total US Army force to include the US Army Active Duty, Reserves, and National Guard. The data was made publicly available in 2017. In addition to the anthropometric and demographic data described below, the ANSUR II database also consists of 3D whole body, foot, and head scans of Soldier participants. These 3D data are not publicly available out of respect for the privacy of ANSUR II participants. The data from this survey are used for a wide range of equipment design, sizing, and tariffing applications within the military and has many potential commercial, industrial, and academic applications.These data have replaced ANSUR I as the most comprehensive publicly accessible dataset on body size and shape. The ANSUR II dataset includes 93 measurements from over 6,000 adult US military personnel, comprising 4,082 men (ANSUR_II_MALE_Public.csv) and 1,986 women (ANSUR_II_FEMALE_Public.csv).

The ANSUR II working databases contain 93 anthropometric measurements which were directly measured, and 15 demographic/administrative variables.

Much more information about the data collection methodology and content of the ANSUR II Working Databases may be found in the following Technical Reports, available from theDefense Technical Information Center (www.dtic.mil) through:

a. 2010-2012 Anthropometric Survey of U.S. Army Personnel: Methods and Summary
Statistics. (NATICK/TR-15/007)
b. Measurer’s Handbook: US Army and Marine Corps Anthropometric Surveys,
2010-2011 (NATICK/TR-11/017)

This information is designed to provide service members, their families, veterans, the general public, and other concerned citizens with the most comprehensive and accurate figures available regarding diagnosed cases of TBI within the U.S. military. Information is collected from electronic medical records and analyzed by the Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center in cooperation with the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center. Numbers for the current year will be updated on a quarterly basis. Other data will be updated annually. At this time, the MHS is unable to provide information regarding cause of injury or _location because that information is not available in most medical records. The numbers represent actual medical diagnoses of TBI within the U.S. Military. Other, larger numbers routinely reported in the media must be considered inaccurate because they do not reflect actual medical diagnoses. Many of these larger numbers are developed utilizing sources such as the Post Deployment Health Assessment (PDHA) or Post Deployment Health Reassessment (PDHRA). However, these documents are assessment tools with TBI screening questions and are not diagnostic tools.

analyze the current population survey (cps) annual social and economic supplement (asec) with r the annual march cps-asec has been supplying the statistics for the census bureau's report on income, poverty, and health insurance coverage since 1948. wow. the us census bureau and the bureau of labor statistics ( bls) tag-team on this one. until the american community survey (acs) hit the scene in the early aughts (2000s), the current population survey had the largest sample size of all the annual general demographic data sets outside of the decennial census - about two hundred thousand respondents. this provides enough sample to conduct state- and a few large metro area-level analyses. your sample size will vanish if you start investigating subgroups b y state - consider pooling multiple years. county-level is a no-no. despite the american community survey's larger size, the cps-asec contains many more variables related to employment, sources of income, and insurance - and can be trended back to harry truman's presidency. aside from questions specifically asked about an annual experience (like income), many of the questions in this march data set should be t reated as point-in-time statistics. cps-asec generalizes to the united states non-institutional, non-active duty military population. the national bureau of economic research (nber) provides sas, spss, and stata importation scripts to create a rectangular file (rectangular data means only person-level records; household- and family-level information gets attached to each person). to import these files into r, the parse.SAScii function uses nber's sas code to determine how to import the fixed-width file, then RSQLite to put everything into a schnazzy database. you can try reading through the nber march 2012 sas importation code yourself, but it's a bit of a proc freak show. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2005-2012 asec - download all microdata.R down load the fixed-width file containing household, family, and person records import by separating this file into three tables, then merge 'em together at the person-level download the fixed-width file containing the person-level replicate weights merge the rectangular person-level file with the replicate weights, then store it in a sql database create a new variable - one - in the data table 2012 asec - analysis examples.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' progr am create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights perform a boatload of analysis examples replicate census estimates - 2011.R connect to the sql database created by the 'download all microdata' program create the complex sample survey object, using the replicate weights match the sas output shown in the png file below 2011 asec replicate weight sas output.png statistic and standard error generated from the replicate-weighted example sas script contained in this census-provided person replicate weights usage instructions document. click here to view these three scripts for more detail about the current population survey - annual social and economic supplement (cps-asec), visit: the census bureau's current population survey page the bureau of labor statistics' current population survey page the current population survey's wikipedia article notes: interviews are conducted in march about experiences during the previous year. the file labeled 2012 includes information (income, work experience, health insurance) pertaining to 2011. when you use the current populat ion survey to talk about america, subract a year from the data file name. as of the 2010 file (the interview focusing on america during 2009), the cps-asec contains exciting new medical out-of-pocket spending variables most useful for supplemental (medical spending-adjusted) poverty research. confidential to sas, spss, stata, sudaan users: why are you still rubbing two sticks together after we've invented the butane lighter? time to transition to r. :D

VBA EDUCATION PROGRAM to provide educational assistance to persons entering the Armed Forces after December 31, 1976, and before July 1, 1985; to assist persons in obtaining an education they might otherwise not be able to afford; and to promote and assist the all volunteer military program of the United States by attracting qualified persons to serve in the Armed Forces. The participant must have entered on active duty on or after January 1, 1977, and before July 1, 1985, and either served on active duty for more than 180 continuous days receiving an other than dishonorable discharge, or have been discharged after January, 1, 1977 because of a service-connected disability. Also eligible are participants who serve for more than 180 days and who continue on active duty and have completed their first period of obligated service (or 6 years of active duty, whichever comes first). Participants must also have satisfactorily contributed to the program. (Satisfactory contribution consists of monthly deduction of $25 to $100 from military pay, up to a maximum of $2,700, for deposit in a special training fund.) Participants may make lump-sum contributions. No individuals on active duty in the Armed Forces may initially begin contributing to this program after March 31, 1987.

This dataset displays the number of active duty military personnel injuries and deaths during Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom. This data is current as of April 26, 2008. It displays statistics regarding hostile, and non hostile deaths and injuries. These figures are broken down by state. * WIA (act) = Actual Wounded in Action (WIA) with home of record for the specified state H=Hostile; NH=Non-hostile * WIA (est) = Additional estimated WIA for the state based on reported losses (not all WIA records have home of record detail)

• Context I am greatly inspired with this dataset containing geo spatial details for each zip code and contains the total wages for each area.This gave me opportunity to create a data visualisation in Tableau using HexBin chart which is added as a Kernel to this dataset.

• Content

  • About the data: 81,831 rows of data. All 41,891 active zipcodes + 634 decommisioned zipcodes from the recent past. All 80673 active Primary(41885), Acceptable(13988), and Not Acceptable(24800) placenames. Some additonal placenames for decommisioned codes. 29,971 Standard, 9465 PO BOX, 2437 Unique, and 649 Military codes.

• 50 States + 361 AA Military

• Americas 38 AE Military

• Europe 164 AP Military

• Pacific 1 AS American Samoa 290 DC Washinton DC 4 FM Federated States Micronesia 13 GU Guam 2 MH Marshall Islands 3 MP Northern Mariana Islands 176 PR Puerto Rico 2 PW Palau 16 VI Virgin Islands

• Name Type Description

• Zipcode Text 5 digit Zipcode or military postal code(FPO/APO)

• ZipCodeType Text Standard, PO BOX Only, Unique, Military(implies APO or FPO)

• City Text USPS offical city name(s)

• State Text USPS offical state, territory, or quasi-state (AA, AE, AP) abbreviation code

• LocationType Text Primary, Acceptable,Not Acceptable

• Lat Double Decimal Latitude, if available

• Long Double Decimal Longitude, if available

• Location Text Standard Display (eg Phoenix, AZ ; Pago Pago, AS ; Melbourne, AU )

• Decommissioned Text If Primary location, Yes implies historical Zipcode, No Implies current Zipcode; If not Primary, Yes implies Historical Placename

• TaxReturnsFiled Long Integer Number of Individual Tax Returns Filed in 2008

• EstimatedPopulation Long Integer Tax returns filed + Married filing jointly + Dependents

• TotalWages Long Integer Total of Wages Salaries and Tips

  • Source: http://federalgovernmentzipcodes.us/

  • Current zipcodes, placenames, zipcode type(Standard, PO, Unique, Military), placename type (Primary, Acceptable, Not Acceptable)

• : USPS Military place names (base or ship name)

• : MPSA 2008 Election Ballot information Tax returns filed, estimated population, total wages: IRS 2008 Latitude and Longitude; National Weather Service supplemented by Google Earth and Maps and occasionally other sources Decommissioned zip codes, Our old database--usually quality sources, but not verifiable.

• Acknowledgements

  Other Sources of zipcode information:

• Placenames (Cities, towns, geographic features) can be found at US Geological Survey GNIS Dataset The IRS has additional data fields for 2008 and is reviewing their publication procedures for later years.

  see http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/indtaxstats/article/0,,id=96947,00.html

• The Census publishes data, but they use Zipcode Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs) which

• 1) have changed areas between the 2000 census and the 2010 census

• 2) do not map well to USPS zipcodes well. If needed http://www.census.gov/geo/ZCTA/zcta.html Social Security recipients by zipcode http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/statcomps/oasdi_zip/ For economic researchers and those who want tons of background on data sources by zipcode, University of Missouri OSEDA project

  • Free Zipcode Database (8.7 MB) Updated 1/22/2012 All Locations (Multiple locations for some zipcodes)

  Inspiration I am hoping that people in the right government agencies/authorities would be able to utilize this data to focus on

  community developments where it needs immediate attention.

The U.S. military’s nonpartisan norms are important for healthy civil-military relations. Some research, however, suggests these norms are weakening. This study examines the evidence for eroding nonpartisan norms by analyzing U.S. military servicemembers’ partisan affiliations and political activism levels from 2008 to 2018. It finds that since 2008, military servicemembers have become more likely to identify as partisans. Servicemembers have also become more politically active than civilians, although this is due to decreasing activism among the American public. It also finds that longer-serving service members have stronger nonpartisan norms, but that newer servicemembers are more politically active than both longer-serving servicemembers and civilians. These findings provide a firmer empirical foundation for previous claims of eroding norms and suggest more research is needed to understand how increased partisanship and political activism impact military readiness and civil-military relations.

To evaluate the incidence, refractive error (RE) association, and distribution of atraumatic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in U.S. military service members (SMs). This study used data from the Military Health System (MHS) M2 database to identify active U.S. military and National Guard SMs diagnosed with RRD from 2017 to 2022. The RE in diopters (D) was manually extracted from available medical charts for 518 eyes. The annual incidence rate of RRD was calculated overall and evaluated in terms of age, gender, and RE. A multivariate Poisson regression model was used to estimate the relative risk (RR) for RRD with RE. From 2017 to 2022, 1,537 SMs were diagnosed with RRD and 1,243,189 were diagnosed with RE. One thousand two hundred seventy-five SMs had both diagnoses: RRD and RE. The overall incidence rate of RRD over the 6-year study was 16.3 per 100,000 people (16.4 and 15.9 for males and females, respectively). In all study groups, the incidence of RRD increased with age. SMs with RE had an overall 25-fold increased risk for RRD compared to SMs without RE. RE was present in 83.0% of cases of RRD. Myopia accounted for 93.3% of cases for eyes with detailed refractive data. The incidence of RRD in U.S. SMs is comparable to other studies and is similar among male and female SMs. RE is present in most cases of RRD in SMs, with the most common type being low to moderate amounts of myopia.

Since 1996, the Center for Military History and Social Sciences of the Bundeswehr (ZMSBw) has conducted a representative survey of the German population on defense and security policy issues on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Defense. In 1996, this study was continued. For this purpose, N = 2568 persons were interviewed on various issues. The present survey focused in particular on Security and threat perception, attitudes toward security policy, foreign deployments of the Federal Armed Forces, tasks of the Federal Armed Forces, the role of conscription, and military cooperation in Europe. Perception of security and threats: personal feeling of security; personal significance of various aspects of security (e.g. job security, military security, social security, security of income, ecological security, etc.) Interest in politics in general, in foreign policy, in security and defence policy as well as interest in the Federal Armed Forces; security policy interest at the beginning of the 1980s; security policy strategy of ´deterrence´ as a guarantee for peace in Europe, necessary Realpolitik or a threat to humanity; advocacy or rejection of military force; change in personal attitude towards military force; Reasons for change of attitude; reasons for not changing attitudes; personal relationship to the peace movement in the early 1980s and today; opinion on pacifism; opinion on the extent of public debate on security policy issues and on the Federal Armed Forces; future development of the number of international conflicts after the end of the Cold War; likelihood of a military threat to Germany; feeling threatened by: environmental destruction, violence, hatred, crime, unemployment, world wars, right-wing extremism, financial problems, new technologies, diseases and population growth; threat to world peace from various countries and regions (Islamic states, Third World, Russia, Central/Eastern Europe, USA, Western Europe, Germany, Middle East, China); current that will prevail worldwide in the future (national or nationalist thinking vs. voluntary cooperation and interdependence); assessment of nationalist thinking; assessment of voluntary cooperation; suitability of various institutions and instruments to protect Germany against military risks (NATO membership, other/ new treaties with neighbouring countries, United Nations (UN), European Union (EU), Federal Armed Forces, European Army, general disarmament, Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)). 2. Security policy attitudes, foreign missions of the Federal Armed Forces: Germany´s role in the world: preference for a rather active vs. rather passive international policy of Germany; approved or rejected measures for Germany´s international action (e.g. aid with food and medicine, aid of a financial and economic nature, technical aid by civil organisations, peacekeeping mission of the Federal Armed Forces within the framework of a UN mission, etc.); opinion on the peace-keeping mission of the Federal Armed Forces in various countries and regions (Eastern Europe, Russia, the Middle East, South-East Asia, Africa, NATO states, Western Europe; opinion on the future role of a state´s military power; opinion on the future staffing level of the Federal Armed Forces; assessment of Germany´s defence expenditure; general attitude towards the Federal Armed Forces. 3. Evaluation of public institutions: Institutional trust (Federal Constitutional Court, other courts, police, Bundesrat, state government, Federal Armed Forces, Bundestag, television, press, churches, trade unions, federal government, education, political parties); reliance on the Federal Armed Forces. 4. Attitude towards compulsory military service: Military service or alternative civilian service more important for society; decision for or against various community services (care of the sick, care of the elderly, military service/defence, care of the disabled, environmental protection/remedy of environmental damage, care of children in need of help, service with the police, border guards or fire brigade); community service which the interviewee would be most likely to opt for social service most likely to be refused; general attitude towards military service; opinion on the right to conscientious objection; frequency of different reasons for conscientious objection (religious reasons, military service as time lost, political reasons, military service not compatible with conscience, civilian service as a more convenient way, economic reasons, civilian service with greater benefit to society); general compulsory military service retained vs. conversion into a voluntary army; future of the Federal Armed Forces (Federal Armed Forces should be abolished, citizen´s army based on the Swiss model, purely voluntary army, current mix of conscripts, professional and temporary soldiers should be retained, fewer professional and temporary soldiers more military exercises for former soldiers); preference for the future of the Federal Armed Forces. 5. Tasks of the Federal Armed Forces: Preferences with regard to the tasks of the Federal Armed Forces (tasks of international arms control, fight against international terrorism, fight against international drug trafficking, border security against illegal immigrants, tasks in the field of environmental protection, international disaster relief, humanitarian aid and rescue services, reconstruction and development aid, international military advice, Combat operations on behalf of and under the control of the UN or other international organisations, peacekeeping operations on behalf of and under the control of the UN or international organisations, protection of the constitutional order in Germany, participation in celebrations and ceremonies, education and character building, defence of Germany, defence of allies, aid for threatened friendly nations); evaluation of the deployment of German soldiers in various UN missions with regard to: care of the suffering population, promotion of the international community, integration of Germany, strengthening of German national interests, stabilisation of world peace, strengthening of the reputation of the Federal Armed Forces, enforcement of human rights, establishment of democracy in the country of deployment, protection of the population in the country of deployment; assessment of the armament and equipment of the Federal Armed Forces; assessment of leadership training in the Federal Armed Forces; assessment of ´soldiering´ as a profession; personal acquaintance with a Federal Armed Forces soldier; personal advice to a relative or friend when considering volunteering for the Federal Armed Forces; importance of co-determination in civilian enterprises; importance of co-determination for soldiers in peacetime; preferences for voluntary service by women in the Federal Armed Forces (women do not belong in the Federal Armed Forces, only in unarmed service, all uses should be open to women); opinion on the complete withdrawal of US troops from Germany; opinion on the complete withdrawal of the Federal Armed Forces from the region; agreement on various possibilities for a new German security policy (extension of NATO security guarantees to Eastern Europe, common European foreign and security policy, restructuring of the military, return to national German interests, strengthening of political cooperation); the importance for Germany of a permanent seat on the UN Security Council; attitudes towards citizens of various neighbouring countries (Belgians, Danes, French, Dutch, Austrians, Poles, Swiss, Czechs and Luxemburgers); the most positive attitudes and the most negative attitudes towards neighbours; a feeling of belonging as West Germans, East Germans, Germans, Europeans or world citizens. 6. Military cooperation in Europe: familiarity of various associations with soldiers from different nations (e.g. German-French Brigade, Eurocorps, German-American Corps, German-Dutch Corps); opinion on military cooperation with various countries (USA, France, Netherlands, England, Belgium, Denmark, Italy); opinion on the creation of a European army; opinion on the political unification of Europe; opinion on the introduction of a common European currency, the Euro; evaluation of the performance of the Federal Armed Forces with regard to reunification in comparison to other institutions (trade unions, churches, political parties, employers´ associations, sports associations and media); opinion on the future NATO deployment of Federal Armed Forces combat troops. Demography: Sex; age (year of birth); education; additional vocational training; occupation; occupational group; net household income; marital status; denomination; residential environment (degree of urbanisation); city size; federal state; household size; number of persons in household aged 16 and over; Left-Right Self-Placement. Additionally coded: Respondent ID; age (categorised); West/East; weight.

Risk ratio and e-values for natural direct, natural indirect, and total effects of multiple-mediator models.

This dataset includes over 200 US military cemeteries, compiled using information from the National Cemetery Administration, National Park Service, American Battlefield Commission, US Army, state veterans departments, and others. For the majority of cemeteries, within the description field, you will find a link to the cemetery's web page along with the physical address. This data was found online at http://bbs.keyhole.com/ubb/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/132750/an/0/page/0#132750.

Attitude to current questions of security policy. Topics: most important problem of the FRG; source of information about events in the FRG; television stations as source of information about problems in the FRG; most important goal of the FRG; support of the FRG in democratization in other countries; foreign influence on the culture of the FRG; American culture as danger to German culture; attitude to the Soviet Union and Michail Gorbachev; attitude to the USA and George Bush; trust in the USA; defense expenditures of the FRG; military threat from various countries (USSR, Eastern European countries, USA, Western European countries, Irak, Iran, Libya and Arab nations); possible dangers for national security of the FRG; degree of familiarity of various organizations (UN, WEU, NATO, EC, CSCE); opinion on various organizations (UN, WEU, NATO, EC, CSCE); common foreign and security policy of the EC; attitude to national defense; agreement among Western European countries regarding defense policy; military forces for the EC itself; military help of the FRG for Eastern European countries; degree of agreement of interests between FRG and USA regarding defense and security of the West; opinion on the European Union; guaranteeing the security of the FRG; opinion on NATO; significance of NATO for security of the FRG; trust in the decisions of NATO regarding the FRG; future of NATO in view of changed political situation in Europe; distribution of defense burdens on NATO member countries; reasons for approval or rejection of NATO; NATO extension to the East; possession of nuclear weapons by NATO; participation of the USA in European defense questions; stationing of troops of the USA in Europe; role of reunited Germany in world politics; significance of NATO membership of united Germany; military contribution of the FRG in the Gulf War; justification of the war against Iran; support of Iraq Kurds by NATO; intervention of NATO outside its borders; compliance with UN Resolutions in military actions; use of military by the USA in the Gulf War; political interest; contacts in the USA; contacts with Americans; self-classification on a left-right continuum. Demography: age; sex; marital status; companion through life; employment; occupational group; income; persons with household; religious denomination; number of residents of interview city; state; Sunday question. Einstellung zu aktuellen sicherheitspolitischen Fragen. Themen: Wichtigstes Problem der BRD; Informationsquelle über Ereignisse in der BRD; Fernsehsender als Informationsquelle über Probleme in der BRD; wichtigstes Ziel der BRD; Hilfestellung der BRD bei der Demokratisierung in anderen Ländern; ausländischer Einfluß auf die Kultur der BRD; amerikanische Kultur als Gefahr für die deutsche Kultur; Einstellung zur Sowjetunion und Michail Gorbatschow; Einstellung zu den USA und George Bush; Vertrauen in die USA; Verteidigungsausgaben der BRD; militärische Bedrohung durch verschiedene Länder (UdSSR, osteuropäische Staaten, USA, westeuropäische Staaten, Irak, Iran, Libyen und arabische Staaten); mögliche Gefahren für die nationale Sicherheit der BRD; Bekanntheitsgrad verschiedener Organisationen (UNO, WEU, NATO, EG, KSZE); Meinung zu verschiedenen Organisationen (UNO, WEU, NATO, EG, KSZE); gemeinsame Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik der EG; Einstellung zur Landesverteidigung; Übereinstimmung unter den westeuropäischen Ländern hinsichtlich der Verteidigungspolitik; eigene Streitkräfte für die EG; militärische Hilfe der BRD für osteuropäische Länder; Grad der Interessenübereinstimmung zwischen der BRD und den USA bezüglich Verteidigung und Sicherheit des Westens; Meinung zur europäischen Union; Gewährleistung der Sicherheit der BRD; Meinung zur NATO; Bedeutung der NATO für die Sicherheit der BRD; Vertrauen in die Entscheidungen der NATO hinsichtlich der BRD; Zukunft der NATO im Hinblick auf die veränderte politische Situation in Europa; Verteilung der Verteidigungslasten auf die NATO-Mitgliedsländer; Gründe für die Befürwortung oder Ablehnung der NATO; NATO-Osterweiterung; Atomwaffenbesitz der NATO; Beteiligung der USA in europäischen Verteidigungsfragen; Truppenstationierung der USA in Europa; Rolle des wiedervereinigten Deutschlands in der Weltpolitik; Bedeutung der NATO-Mitgliedschaft des vereinten Deutschlands; militärischer Beitrag der BRD im Golfkrieg; Rechtfertigung des Kriegs gegen den Iran; Unterstützung irakischer Kurden durch die NATO; Eingreifen der NATO außerhalb ihrer Grenzen; Befolgung der UNO-Resolutionen bei militärischen Aktionen; Militäreinsatz der USA im Golfkrieg; politisches Interesse; Kontakte in die USA; Kontakte mit Amerikanern; Selbsteinstufung auf einem links-rechts-Kontinuum. Demographie: Alter; Geschlecht; Familienstand; Lebensgefährte/in; Berufstätigkeit; Berufsgruppe; Einkommen; Personen mit Haushalt; Konfessionszugehörigkeit; Einwohnerzahl des Befragunsorts; Land; Sonntagsfrage.

Baseline characteristics of participants allocated to usual medical care plus chiropractic care vs. usual medical care alone (n = 750).

Proportion mediated and total, direct, and indirect effects of chiropractic care on pain interference and pain intensity from multiple mediator models.

Other-Current-Assets Time Series for Textron Inc. Textron Inc. operates in the aircraft, defense, industrial, and finance businesses worldwide. It operates in six segments: Textron Aviation, Bell, Textron Systems, Industrial, Textron eAviation, and Finance. The Textron Aviation segment manufactures, sells, and services business jets, turboprop and piston engine aircraft, and military trainer and defense aircraft; and offers maintenance, inspection, and repair services, as well as sells commercial parts. The Bell segment supplies military and commercial helicopters, tiltrotor aircrafts, and related spare parts and services. The Textron Systems segment offers unmanned aircraft systems, electronic systems and solutions, advanced marine crafts, piston aircraft engines, live military air-to-air and air-to-ship training, weapons and related components, and armored and specialty vehicles. The Industrial segment offers blow-molded solutions, including conventional plastic fuel tanks and pressurized fuel tanks for hybrid vehicle applications, clear-vision systems, plastic tanks for catalytic reduction systems, and battery housing systems for use in electric vehicles primarily to automobile original equipment manufacturers (OEMs); and golf cars, off-road utility vehicles, powersports products, light transportation vehicles, aviation ground support equipment, professional turf-maintenance equipment, and turf-care vehicles to golf courses and resorts, government agencies and municipalities, consumers, outdoor enthusiasts, and commercial and industrial users. The Textron eAviation segment manufactures and sells light aircraft and gliders with electric and combustion engines; and provides other research and development initiatives related to sustainable aviation solutions. The Finance segment offers financing services to purchase new and pre-owned aviation aircraft and Bell helicopters. Textron Inc. was founded in 1923 and is headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island.