7 datasets found
  1. Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024

    • statista.com
    Updated Jun 24, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2025). Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198095/pets-in-the-united-states-by-type-in-2008/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jun 24, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    An estimated ** million households in the United States owned at least one dog according to a 2024/25 pet owners survey, making them the most widely owned type of pet across the U.S. at this time. Cats and freshwater fish ranked in second and third places, with around ** million and ** million households owning such pets, respectively. Freshwater vs. salt water fish Freshwater fish spend most or all their lives in fresh water. Fresh water’s main difference to salt water is the level of salinity. Freshwater fish have a range of physiological adaptations to enable them to live in such conditions. As the statistic makes clear, Americans keep a large number of freshwater aquatic species at home as pets. American pet owners In 2023, around ** percent of all households in the United States owned a pet. This is a decrease from 2020, but still around a ** percent increase from 1988. It is no surprise that as more and more households own pets, pet industry expenditure has also witnessed steady growth. Expenditure reached over *** billion U.S. dollars in 2022, almost a sixfold increase from 1998. The majority of pet product sales are still made in brick-and-mortar stores, despite the rise and evolution of e-commerce in the United States.

  2. f

    Table_1_Characterizing Pet Acquisition and Retention During the COVID-19...

    • frontiersin.figshare.com
    docx
    Updated May 30, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Christy L. Hoffman; Melissa Thibault; Julie Hong (2023). Table_1_Characterizing Pet Acquisition and Retention During the COVID-19 Pandemic.DOCX [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.781403.s001
    Explore at:
    docxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Frontiers
    Authors
    Christy L. Hoffman; Melissa Thibault; Julie Hong
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    In March 2020, Americans began experiencing numerous lifestyle changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Some reports have suggested that pet acquisition and ownership increased during this period, and some have suggested shelters and rescues will be overwhelmed once pandemic-related restrictions are lifted and lifestyles shift yet again. In May 2021, the ASPCA hired the global market research company Ipsos to conduct a general population survey that would provide a more comprehensive picture of pet ownership and acquisition during the pandemic. Although pet owners care for a number of species, the term pet owner in this study specifically refers to those who had dogs and/or cats. One goal of the survey was to determine whether data from a sample of adults residing in the United States would corroborate findings from national shelter databases indicating that animals were not being surrendered to shelters in large numbers. Furthermore, this survey gauged individuals' concerns related to the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions, and analyses examined factors associated with pet owners indicating they were considering rehoming an animal within the next 3 months. The data showed that pet ownership did not increase during the pandemic and that pets may have been rehomed in greater numbers than occurs during more stable times. Importantly, rehomed animals were placed with friends, family members, and neighbors more frequently than they were relinquished to animal shelters and rescues. Findings associated with those who rehomed an animal during the pandemic, or were considering rehoming, suggest that animal welfare organizations have opportunities to increase pet retention by providing resources regarding pet-friendly housing and affordable veterinary options and by helping pet owners strategize how to incorporate their animals into their post-pandemic lifestyles.

  3. d

    Endocasts and brain volume of dogs

    • search.dataone.org
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • +3more
    Updated Jul 17, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Laszlo Zsolt Garamszegi (2025). Endocasts and brain volume of dogs [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.nzs7h44wn
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 17, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad Digital Repository
    Authors
    Laszlo Zsolt Garamszegi
    Time period covered
    Jan 1, 2023
    Description

    Domestication is a well-known example of the relaxation of environmentally-based cognitive selection that leads to reductions in brain size. However, little is known about how brain size evolves after domestication and whether subsequent directional/artificial selection can compensate for domestication effects. The first animal to be domesticated was the dog, and recent directional breeding generated the extensive phenotypic variation among breeds we observe today. Here we use a novel endocranial dataset based on high-resolution CT scans to estimate brain size in 159 dog breeds and analyze how relative brain size varies across breeds in relation to functional selection, longevity, and litter size. In our analyses, we controlled for potential confounding factors such as common descent, gene flow, body size, and skull shape. We found that dogs have consistently smaller relative brain size than wolves supporting the domestication effect, but breeds that are more distantly related to wolves..., We processed the collection of dog skulls that is maintained at the Department of Anatomy, Cell and Developmental Biology, Eötvös Loránd University (Budapest, Hungary). This private collection (owned by TC) is composed of specimens that have been obtained mostly in the last 10 years by the appropriate preparation of the heads of deceased dogs (which were donated post-mortem), from which the soft materials have been removed a priori. TC systematically collected the prepared skulls with the aim of having both male and female samples from as many breeds as possible. Breed identity was usually verified upon the collection of cadavers/skulls, given that these materials originate from known dog breeders. Alternatively, we checked the appropriate breed certificates/chips for pedigree. Currently, the collection consists of 383 individual skulls (including males, females and unknown sexes) from 146 breeds. We selected 172 skulls (38 females, 83 males and 50 unknown sexes) across all breeds repre..., Microsoft Excel, RÂ

  4. H

    Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE)

    • dataverse.harvard.edu
    Updated May 30, 2013
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Anthony Damico (2013). Consumer Expenditure Survey (CE) [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/UTNJAH
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    May 30, 2013
    Dataset provided by
    Harvard Dataverse
    Authors
    Anthony Damico
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    analyze the consumer expenditure survey (ce) with r the consumer expenditure survey (ce) is the primo data source to understand how americans spend money. participating households keep a running diary about every little purchase over the year. those diaries are then summed up into precise expenditure categories. how else are you gonna know that the average american household spent $34 (±2) on bacon, $826 (±17) on cellular phones, and $13 (±2) on digital e-readers in 2011? an integral component of the market basket calculation in the consumer price index, this survey recently became available as public-use microdata and they're slowly releasing historical files back to 1996. hooray! for a t aste of what's possible with ce data, look at the quick tables listed on their main page - these tables contain approximately a bazillion different expenditure categories broken down by demographic groups. guess what? i just learned that americans living in households with $5,000 to $9,999 of annual income spent an average of $283 (±90) on pets, toys, hobbies, and playground equipment (pdf page 3). you can often get close to your statistic of interest from these web tables. but say you wanted to look at domestic pet expenditure among only households with children between 12 and 17 years old. another one of the thirteen web tables - the consumer unit composition table - shows a few different breakouts of households with kids, but none matching that exact population of interest. the bureau of labor statistics (bls) (the survey's designers) and the census bureau (the survey's administrators) have provided plenty of the major statistics and breakouts for you, but they're not psychic. if you want to comb through this data for specific expenditure categories broken out by a you-defined segment of the united states' population, then let a little r into your life. fun starts now. fair warning: only analyze t he consumer expenditure survey if you are nerd to the core. the microdata ship with two different survey types (interview and diary), each containing five or six quarterly table formats that need to be stacked, merged, and manipulated prior to a methodologically-correct analysis. the scripts in this repository contain examples to prepare 'em all, just be advised that magnificent data like this will never be no-assembly-required. the folks at bls have posted an excellent summary of what's av ailable - read it before anything else. after that, read the getting started guide. don't skim. a few of the descriptions below refer to sas programs provided by the bureau of labor statistics. you'll find these in the C:\My Directory\CES\2011\docs directory after you run the download program. this new github repository contains three scripts: 2010-2011 - download all microdata.R lo op through every year and download every file hosted on the bls's ce ftp site import each of the comma-separated value files into r with read.csv depending on user-settings, save each table as an r data file (.rda) or stat a-readable file (.dta) 2011 fmly intrvw - analysis examples.R load the r data files (.rda) necessary to create the 'fmly' table shown in the ce macros program documentation.doc file construct that 'fmly' table, using five quarters of interviews (q1 2011 thru q1 2012) initiate a replicate-weighted survey design object perform some lovely li'l analysis examples replicate the %mean_variance() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of calculating descriptive statistics using unimputed variables replicate the %compare_groups() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of performing t -tests using unimputed variables create an rsqlite database (to minimize ram usage) containing the five imputed variable files, after identifying which variables were imputed based on pdf page 3 of the user's guide to income imputation initiate a replicate-weighted, database-backed, multiply-imputed survey design object perform a few additional analyses that highlight the modified syntax required for multiply-imputed survey designs replicate the %mean_variance() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of calculating descriptive statistics using imputed variables repl icate the %compare_groups() macro found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of performing t-tests using imputed variables replicate the %proc_reg() and %proc_logistic() macros found in "ce macros.sas" and provide some examples of regressions and logistic regressions using both unimputed and imputed variables replicate integrated mean and se.R match each step in the bls-provided sas program "integr ated mean and se.sas" but with r instead of sas create an rsqlite database when the expenditure table gets too large for older computers to handle in ram export a table "2011 integrated mean and se.csv" that exactly matches the contents of the sas-produced "2011 integrated mean and se.lst" text file click here to view these three scripts for...

  5. D

    Pet GPS Collar Market Research Report 2033

    • dataintelo.com
    csv, pdf, pptx
    Updated Jun 28, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Dataintelo (2025). Pet GPS Collar Market Research Report 2033 [Dataset]. https://dataintelo.com/report/pet-gps-collar-market
    Explore at:
    csv, pptx, pdfAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 28, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Dataintelo
    License

    https://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policyhttps://dataintelo.com/privacy-and-policy

    Time period covered
    2024 - 2032
    Area covered
    Global
    Description

    Pet GPS Collar Market Outlook



    According to our latest research, the global Pet GPS Collar market size reached USD 735.4 million in 2024, reflecting a robust expansion driven by rising pet ownership and increasing demand for smart pet safety solutions. The market is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 14.2% during the forecast period, projecting the market to attain a value of USD 2,087.6 million by 2033. This remarkable growth is primarily fueled by technological advancements in pet tracking devices, heightened awareness about pet health and safety, and the integration of IoT-enabled solutions for real-time monitoring.




    One of the primary growth factors for the Pet GPS Collar market is the surge in pet adoption rates worldwide, particularly in urban regions where pets are increasingly considered family members. With the shift in demographic trends and lifestyle changes, pet owners are seeking advanced solutions to ensure the safety and well-being of their pets. The rise in disposable income has further enabled consumers to invest in premium pet products, including smart collars equipped with GPS tracking, health monitoring, and activity tracking features. Moreover, the trend of pet humanization has led to a greater emphasis on preventive healthcare and safety, prompting pet owners to adopt technologically advanced collars that offer peace of mind and convenience.




    Another significant driver shaping the Pet GPS Collar market is the rapid technological evolution in the field of wearable devices. The integration of GPS, RFID, Bluetooth, and cellular technologies into pet collars has revolutionized the way pet owners monitor and track their animals. These advancements have made it possible to access real-time location data, set safe zones, and receive instant alerts in case of pet escape or unusual activity. The proliferation of smartphones and mobile applications has further enhanced the usability of pet GPS collars, enabling seamless connectivity and user-friendly interfaces. Additionally, the emergence of cloud-based platforms and AI-powered analytics is providing valuable insights into pet behavior and health, thus adding value to the product offerings.




    The market is also benefitting from increasing collaborations between pet accessory manufacturers and technology firms, leading to the development of innovative and multifunctional products. Companies are investing in research and development to introduce collars with extended battery life, waterproof designs, and improved durability to cater to the diverse needs of pet owners. Furthermore, the growing popularity of e-commerce platforms has made it easier for consumers to access a wide range of pet GPS collars, compare features, and make informed purchasing decisions. However, the market faces challenges such as high product costs, concerns over data privacy, and limited awareness in developing regions, which may hinder growth to some extent.




    Regionally, North America dominates the Pet GPS Collar market, accounting for the largest share in 2024, followed by Europe and Asia Pacific. The high adoption rate of smart pet accessories, strong presence of key market players, and favorable regulatory environment contribute to the region's leadership. Europe is witnessing steady growth due to increasing pet ownership and stringent animal welfare regulations, while the Asia Pacific market is expanding rapidly owing to rising urbanization, growing middle-class population, and increasing awareness about pet safety. Latin America and the Middle East & Africa are also emerging as promising markets, albeit at a slower pace, due to improving economic conditions and changing consumer attitudes towards pet care.



    Product Type Analysis



    The Product Type segment in the Pet GPS Collar market encompasses smart collars, tracking collars, training collars, and others, each catering to distinct consumer needs and preferences. Smart collars have emerged as the most popular product type, driven by their multifunctional capabilities such as real-time GPS tracking, activity monitoring, and health diagnostics. These collars are often equipped with advanced sensors and connectivity features, allowing pet owners to monitor their pets' location, physical activity, and even vital signs through mobile applications. The increasing demand for integrated solutions that offer both safety and health monitoring is propelling the growth of smart collars, especially among t

  6. Data from: Y-chromosome evidence supports asymmetric dog introgression into...

    • zenodo.org
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    • +2more
    Updated May 29, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Tyler J. Wheeldon; Linda Y. Rutledge; Brent R. Patterson; Bradley N. White; Paul J. Wilson; Tyler J. Wheeldon; Linda Y. Rutledge; Brent R. Patterson; Bradley N. White; Paul J. Wilson (2022). Data from: Y-chromosome evidence supports asymmetric dog introgression into eastern coyotes [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.72s5k
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    May 29, 2022
    Dataset provided by
    Zenodohttp://zenodo.org/
    Authors
    Tyler J. Wheeldon; Linda Y. Rutledge; Brent R. Patterson; Bradley N. White; Paul J. Wilson; Tyler J. Wheeldon; Linda Y. Rutledge; Brent R. Patterson; Bradley N. White; Paul J. Wilson
    License

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedicationhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    Hybridization has played an important role in the evolutionary history of Canis species in eastern North America. Genetic evidence of coyote–dog hybridization based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is lacking compared to that based on autosomal markers. This discordance suggests dog introgression into coyotes has potentially been male biased, but this hypothesis has not been formally tested. Therefore, we investigated biparentally, maternally, and paternally inherited genetic markers in a sample of coyotes and dogs from southeastern Ontario to assess potential asymmetric dog introgression into coyotes. Analysis of autosomal microsatellite genotypes revealed minimal historical and contemporary admixture between coyotes and dogs. We observed only mutually exclusive mtDNA haplotypes in coyotes and dogs, but we observed Y-chromosome haplotypes (Y-haplotypes) in both historical and contemporary coyotes that were also common in dogs. Species-specific Zfy intron sequences of Y-haplotypes shared between coyotes and dogs confirmed their homology and indicated a putative origin from dogs. We compared Y-haplotypes observed in coyotes, wolves, and dogs profiled in multiple studies, and observed that the Y-haplotypes shared between coyotes and dogs were either absent or rare in North American wolves, present in eastern coyotes, but absent in western coyotes. We suggest the eastern coyote has experienced asymmetric genetic introgression from dogs, resulting from predominantly historical hybridization with male dogs and subsequent backcrossing of hybrid offspring with coyotes. We discuss the temporal and spatial dynamics of coyote–dog hybridization and the conditions that may have facilitated the introgression of dog Y-chromosomes into coyotes. Our findings clarify the evolutionary history of the eastern coyote.

  7. An evaluation of Brazil’s surveillance and prophylaxis of canine rabies...

    • plos.figshare.com
    • datasetcatalog.nlm.nih.gov
    xlsx
    Updated Jun 4, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Julio A. Benavides; Jane Megid; Aline Campos; Silene Rocha; Marco A. N. Vigilato; Katie Hampson (2023). An evaluation of Brazil’s surveillance and prophylaxis of canine rabies between 2008 and 2017 [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0007564
    Explore at:
    xlsxAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 4, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOShttp://plos.org/
    Authors
    Julio A. Benavides; Jane Megid; Aline Campos; Silene Rocha; Marco A. N. Vigilato; Katie Hampson
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Brazil
    Description

    An effective surveillance system is critical for the elimination of canine rabies in Latin America. Brazil has made substantial progress towards canine rabies elimination, but outbreaks still occurred in the last decade in two states. Brazil uses a health information system (SINAN) to record patients seeking post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) following contact with an animal suspected of having rabies. This study evaluated: (i) whether SINAN can be reliably used for rabies surveillance; (ii) if patients in Brazil are receiving appropriate PEP and (iii) the benefits of implementing the latest World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations on PEP. Analysing SINAN records from 2008 to 2017 reveals an average of 506,148 bite-injury patients/year [range: 437k-545k] in the country, equivalent to an incidence of 255 bite-injuries/100,000 people/year [range: 231–280]. The number of reports of bites from suspect rabid dogs generally increased over time. In most states, records from SINAN indicating a suspect rabid dog do not correlate with confirmed dog rabies cases reported to the Regional Information System for Epidemiological Surveillance of Rabies (SIRVERA) maintained by the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO). Analyses showed that in 2017, only 45% of patients received appropriate PEP as indicated by the Brazilian Ministry of Health guidance. Implementation of the latest WHO guidance using an abridged intradermal post-exposure vaccination regimen including one precautionary dose for dog bites prior to observation would reduce the volume of vaccine required by up to 64%, with potential for annual savings of over USD 6 million from reduced vaccine use. Our results highlight the need to improve the implementation of SINAN, including training of health workers responsible for delivering PEP using an Integrated Bite Case Management approach so that SINAN can serve as a reliable surveillance tool for canine rabies elimination.

  8. Not seeing a result you expected?
    Learn how you can add new datasets to our index.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Statista (2025). Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198095/pets-in-the-united-states-by-type-in-2008/
Organization logo

Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2024

Explore at:
19 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
Dataset updated
Jun 24, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Statistahttp://statista.com/
Area covered
United States
Description

An estimated ** million households in the United States owned at least one dog according to a 2024/25 pet owners survey, making them the most widely owned type of pet across the U.S. at this time. Cats and freshwater fish ranked in second and third places, with around ** million and ** million households owning such pets, respectively. Freshwater vs. salt water fish Freshwater fish spend most or all their lives in fresh water. Fresh water’s main difference to salt water is the level of salinity. Freshwater fish have a range of physiological adaptations to enable them to live in such conditions. As the statistic makes clear, Americans keep a large number of freshwater aquatic species at home as pets. American pet owners In 2023, around ** percent of all households in the United States owned a pet. This is a decrease from 2020, but still around a ** percent increase from 1988. It is no surprise that as more and more households own pets, pet industry expenditure has also witnessed steady growth. Expenditure reached over *** billion U.S. dollars in 2022, almost a sixfold increase from 1998. The majority of pet product sales are still made in brick-and-mortar stores, despite the rise and evolution of e-commerce in the United States.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu