The United States Cancer Statistics (USCS) online databases in WONDER provide cancer incidence and mortality data for the United States for the years since 1999, by year, state and metropolitan areas (MSA), age group, race, ethnicity, sex, childhood cancer classifications and cancer site. Report case counts, deaths, crude and age-adjusted incidence and death rates, and 95% confidence intervals for rates. The USCS data are the official federal statistics on cancer incidence from registries having high-quality data and cancer mortality statistics for 50 states and the District of Columbia. USCS are produced by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), in collaboration with the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries (NAACCR). Mortality data are provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Vital Statistics System (NVSS).

The Get Data Out programme from the National Disease Registration Service publishes detailed statistics about small groups of cancer patients in a way that ensures patient anonymity is maintained. The Get Data Out programme currently covers 15 cancer sites. This data release is a corrected re-release of detailed statistics for 2013-2019 treatment data. The correction means that surgery counts are no longer slightly underreported. There are some small changes in group sizes of usually no more than 2%, although this is larger for non-melanoma skin cancers. The 15 cancer sites now covered by Get Data Out are: ‘Bladder, Urethra, Renal Pelvis and Ureter’, ‘Bone cancer’, ‘Brain, meningeal and other primary CNS tumours’, ‘Eye cancer’, ‘Head and neck’, ‘Kaposi sarcoma’, ‘Kidney’, ‘Oesophageal and Stomach’, ‘Ovary, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal carcinomas’, ‘Pancreas’, ‘Prostate’, ‘Sarcoma’, ‘Skin tumours’, ‘Soft tissue and peripheral nerve cancer’, ‘Testicular tumours including post-pubertal teratomas’. Anonymisation standards are designed into the data by aggregation at the outset. Patients diagnosed with a certain type of tumour are divided into many smaller groups, each of which contains approximately 100 patients with the same characteristics. These groups are aimed to be clinically meaningful and differ across cancer sites. For each group of patients, Get Data Out routinely publish statistics about incidence, routes to diagnosis, treatments and survival. All releases and documentation are available on the Get Data Out main technical page. Before using the data, we recommend that you read the guide for first time users. The data is available in an open format for anyone to access and use. We hope that by releasing anonymous detailed data like this we can help researchers, the public and patients themselves discover more about cancer. If you have feedback or any other queries about Get Data Out, please email us at NDRSenquires@nhs.net and mention 'Get Data Out' in your email.

Users can access data about cancer statistics in the United States including but not limited to searches by type of cancer and race, sex, ethnicity, age at diagnosis, and age at death. Background Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database’s mission is to provide information on cancer statistics to help reduce the burden of disease in the U.S. population. The SEER database is a project to the National Cancer Institute. The SEER database collects information on incidence, prevalence, and survival from specific geographic areas representing 28 percent of the United States population. User functionality Users can access a variety of reso urces. Cancer Stat Fact Sheets allow users to look at summaries of statistics by major cancer type. Cancer Statistic Reviews are available from 1975-2008 in table format. Users are also able to build their own tables and graphs using Fast Stats. The Cancer Query system provides more flexibility and a larger set of cancer statistics than F ast Stats but requires more input from the user. State Cancer Profiles include dynamic maps and graphs enabling the investigation of cancer trends at the county, state, and national levels. SEER research data files and SEER*Stat software are available to download through your Internet connection (SEER*Stat’s client-server mode) or via discs shipped directly to you. A signed data agreement form is required to access the SEER data Data Notes Data is available in different formats depending on which type of data is accessed. Some data is available in table, PDF, and html formats. Detailed information about the data is available under “Data Documentation and Variable Recodes”.

Snapshot img

Cancer Registry Software Market Size 2024-2028

The cancer registry software market size is forecast to increase by USD 97.1 million at a CAGR of 12.75% between 2023 and 2028.

The growing prevalence of cancer cases is the key driver of the cancer registry software market. CDC is a key player, specializing in providing advanced cancer registry software solutions, including Registry Plus. These systems facilitate accurate and efficient data management for healthcare organizations, enabling effective tracking, analysis, and reporting of cancer patient information as well as supporting cancer immunotherapy and cancer diagnostics. By supporting improved patient care and research outcomes, CDC's solutions are essential in addressing the increasing demand for comprehensive cancer data management. 
Additionally, data privacy and security concerns are driving the market, as healthcare organizations prioritize protecting sensitive patient information. These trends are shaping the market, which is expected to continue its growth trajectory In the coming years.

What will be the Size of the Cancer Registry Software Market During the Forecast Period?

Request Free Sample

The market is experiencing significant growth due to the increasing incidence of cancer and the need for efficient and accurate data management In the healthcare industry. With the adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and the shift towards evidence-based medicine, cancer registry software solutions have become essential tools for medical professionals to track cancer treatment, therapeutics, and patient outcomes. 
These solutions enable the collection and analysis of data on cancer prevalence, diagnostics, and specific area-focused cancer incidence. They provide valuable insights into cancer-specific outcomes, including chemotherapy, surgery, supportive treatments, and post-endoscopic resection. Furthermore, regulatory guidance documents mandate the use of cancer registry software to ensure compliance with healthcare standards and reduce healthcare costs.
Medical professionals rely on these software solutions to improve patient care and support the ongoing research and development of new cancer treatments.

How is this Cancer Registry Software Industry segmented and which is the largest segment?

The cancer registry software industry research report provides comprehensive data (region-wise segment analysis), with forecasts and estimates in 'USD million' for the period 2024-2028, as well as historical data from 2018-2022 for the following segments.

End-user

  Government and third party
  Pharma biotech and medical device companies
  Hospitals and medical practice
  Private payers
  Research institutes


Type

  Stand-alone software
  Integrated software


Deployment

  On-premise
  Cloud


Component

  Commercial
  Public


Geography

  North America

    Canada
    US


  Europe

    Germany
    Italy


  Asia

    China


  Rest of World (ROW)

By End-user Insights

The government and third party segment is estimated to witness significant growth during the forecast period. Cancer registry software plays a pivotal role in managing data related to cancer cases for government hospitals and third-party agencies. This software facilitates the collection, management, and analysis of data on cancer incidence, prevalence, and mortality rates. This information is essential for public health planning, resource allocation, and policy development. By identifying trends and patterns, governments and agencies can target high-risk populations, address geographic disparities, and recognize emerging cancer types. Cancer registry software enhances the quality of cancer care by enabling the evaluation of treatment practices against clinical guidelines and benchmarking outcomes against standards. The software supports seamless data integration and interoperability with healthcare systems, ensuring coordinated care for cancer patients.

Medical professionals and patients alike benefit from improved cancer care through evidence-based medicine, cancer-specific outcomes, and research institutes. Software solutions cater to various cancer types, including lung cancer, and support cancer staging, treatment, disease management, diagnostics, chemo, surgery, and supportive therapies. These solutions integrate with electronic health records (EHR), enabling secure data storage and access to essential health information. Data security and security protocols are prioritized to protect patient privacy and prevent medical identity theft. Cancer registry software supports population health management, healthcare cost containment, and chronic disease management. It aligns with healthcare quality goals and streamlines hospital workflows, making it an essential tool for oncology departments, clinics, hospitals, medical practices, pharmaceutical, biotech, and medical de

Cancer was responsible for around 142 deaths per 100,000 population in the United States in 2022. The death rate for cancer has steadily decreased since the 1990’s, but cancer still remains the second leading cause of death in the United States. The deadliest type of cancer for both men and women is cancer of the lung and bronchus which will account for an estimated 65,790 deaths among men alone in 2024. Probability of surviving Survival rates for cancer vary significantly depending on the type of cancer. The cancers with the highest rates of survival include cancers of the thyroid, prostate, and testis, with five-year survival rates as high as 99 percent for thyroid cancer. The cancers with the lowest five-year survival rates include cancers of the pancreas, liver, and esophagus. Risk factors It is difficult to determine why one person develops cancer while another does not, but certain risk factors have been shown to increase a person’s chance of developing cancer. For example, cigarette smoking has been proven to increase the risk of developing various cancers. In fact, around 81 percent of cancers of the lung, bronchus and trachea among adults aged 30 years and older can be attributed to cigarette smoking. A recent poll indicated that many U.S. adults believed smoking cigarettes and using other tobacco products increased a person’s risk of developing cancer, but a much smaller percentage believed the same for proven risk factors such as obesity and drinking alcohol.

This dataset contains Cancer Incidence data for Prostate Cancer(All Stages^) including: Age-Adjusted Rate, Confidence Interval, Average Annual Count, and Trend field information for US States for the average 5 year span from 2016 to 2020.Data are for males segmented age (All Ages, Ages Under 50, Ages 50 & Over, Ages Under 65, and Ages 65 & Over), with field names and aliases describing the sex and age group tabulated.For more information, visit statecancerprofiles.cancer.govData NotationsState Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.TrendRising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.‡ Incidence Trend data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.Data Source Field Key(1) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.(5) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.(6) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).(7) Source: SEER November 2022 submission.(8) Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.Some data are not available, see Data Not Available for combinations of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

SEER Limited-Use cancer incidence data with associated population data. Geographic areas available are county and SEER registry. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute collects and distributes high quality, comprehensive cancer data from a number of population-based cancer registries. Data include patient demographics, primary tumor site, morphology, stage at diagnosis, first course of treatment, and follow-up for vital status. The SEER Program is the only comprehensive source of population-based information in the United States that includes stage of cancer at the time of diagnosis and survival rates within each stage.

SEER collects cancer incidence data from population-based cancer registries covering approximately 47.9 percent of the U.S. population. The SEER registries collect data on patient demographics, primary tumor site, tumor morphology, stage at diagnosis, and first course of treatment, and they follow up with patients for vital status.There are two data products available: SEER Research and SEER Research Plus. This was motivated because of concerns about the increasing risk of re-identifiability of individuals. The Research Plus databases require more rigorous process for access that includes user authentication through Institutional Account or multiple-step request process for Non-Institutional users.

PLACES is the expansion of the original 500 Cities project and covers the entire United States—50 states and the District of Columbia (DC). Estimates were provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Division of Population Health, Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch. PLACES provides health data for small areas across the country.

This dataset is about books and is filtered where the book subjects is Cancer-Patients-United States-Anecdotes, featuring 9 columns including author, BNB id, book, book publisher, and book subjects. The preview is ordered by publication date (descending).

This statistic depicts the incidence of biomarker positivity among patients with breast cancer, as of 2017. According to the data, 53 percent of patients with HER2-HR+, postmenopausal breast cancer had positive biomarker results.

This dataset contains Cancer Incidence data for Lung Cancer (All Stages^) including: Age-Adjusted Rate, Confidence Interval, Average Annual Count, and Trend field information for US States for the average 5 year span from 2016 to 2020.Data are segmented by sex (Both Sexes, Male, and Female) and age (All Ages, Ages Under 50, Ages 50 & Over, Ages Under 65, and Ages 65 & Over), with field names and aliases describing the sex and age group tabulated.For more information, visit statecancerprofiles.cancer.govData NotationsState Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.TrendRising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.‡ Incidence Trend data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.Data Source Field Key(1) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.(5) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.(6) Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).(7) Source: SEER November 2022 submission.(8) Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.Some data are not available, see Data Not Available for combinations of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

In 2022, the oncology information system market was estimated at 302 million U.S. dollars and it was forecast to increase to 440 million U.S. dollars by 2027. Between 2020 and 2025, the cancer biomarkers market in the region is expected to grow from 1.16 billion and 1.99 billion U.S. dollars.

BackgroundReduced overall survival has been observed in patients with left-sided versus right-sided breast cancer due to cardiac toxicity after radiotherapy. However, the effect of laterality and primary tumor site on breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) remains unclear.Patients and MethodsWe analyzed data from 305,443 women ages 20- to 79-years-old diagnosed with breast cancer between 1990 and 2009. The data were obtained from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute. The survival outcomes with regard to laterality and primary tumor site were compared using univariate and multivariate (Cox proportional hazards regression model) methods.ResultsIn the multivariate analysis, BCSM was affected by the primary tumor site (P

Background: The aggressive and heterogeneous nature of lung cancer has thwarted efforts to reduce mortality from this cancer through the use of screening. The advent of low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) altered the landscape of lung-cancer screening, with studies indicating that low-dose CT detects many tumors at early stages. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) was conducted to determine whether screening with low-dose CT could reduce mortality from lung cancer.

Methods: From August 2002 through April 2004, we enrolled 53,454 persons at high risk for lung cancer at 33 U.S. medical centers. Participants were randomly assigned to undergo three annual screenings with either low-dose CT (26,722 participants) or single-view posteroanterior chest radiography (26,732). Data were collected on cases of lung cancer and deaths from lung cancer that occurred through December 31, 2009. This dataset includes the low-dose CT scans from 26,254 of these subjects, as well as digitized histopathology images from 451 subjects.

Results: The rate of adherence to screening was more than 90%. The rate of positive screening tests was 24.2% with low-dose CT and 6.9% with radiography over all three rounds. A total of 96.4% of the positive screening results in the low-dose CT group and 94.5% in the radiography group were false positive results. The incidence of lung cancer was 645 cases per 100,000 person-years (1060 cancers) in the low-dose CT group, as compared with 572 cases per 100,000 person-years (941 cancers) in the radiography group (rate ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.23). There were 247 deaths from lung cancer per 100,000 person-years in the low-dose CT group and 309 deaths per 100,000 person-years in the radiography group, representing a relative reduction in mortality from lung cancer with low-dose CT screening of 20.0% (95% CI, 6.8 to 26.7; P=0.004). The rate of death from any cause was reduced in the low-dose CT group, as compared with the radiography group, by 6.7% (95% CI, 1.2 to 13.6; P=0.02).

Conclusions: Screening with the use of low-dose CT reduces mortality from lung cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; National Lung Screening Trial ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00047385).

Data Availability: A summary of the National Lung Screening Trial and its available datasets are provided on the Cancer Data Access System (CDAS). CDAS is maintained by Information Management System (IMS), contracted by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) as keepers and statistical analyzers of the NLST trial data. The full clinical data set from NLST is available through CDAS. Users of TCIA can download without restriction a publicly distributable subset of that clinical data, along with the CT and Histopathology images collected during the trial. (These previously were restricted.)

Dataset Card for "breast-cancer"

Dataset was taken from the MedSAM project and used in this notebook which fine-tunes Meta's SAM model on the dataset. More Information needed

Characteristics of the study population by type of cancer.

The identification of gene fusions promises to play an important role in personalized cancer treatment decisions. Many rare gene fusion events have been identified in fresh frozen solid tumors from common cancers employing next-generation sequencing technology. However the ability to detect transcripts from gene fusions in RNA isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissues, which exist in very large sample repositories for which disease outcome is known, is still limited due to the low complexity of FFPE libraries and the lack of appropriate bioinformatics methods. We sought to develop a bioinformatics method, named gFuse, to detect fusion transcripts in FFPE tumor tissues. An integrated, cohort based strategy has been used in gFuse to examine single-end 50 base pair (bp) reads generated from FFPE RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) datasets employing two breast cancer cohorts of 136 and 76 patients. In total, 118 fusion events were detected transcriptome-wide at base-pair resolution across the 212 samples. We selected 77 candidate fusions based on their biological relevance to cancer and supported 61% of these using TaqMan assays. Direct sequencing of 19 of the fusion sequences identified by TaqMan confirmed them. Three unique fused gene pairs were recurrent across the 212 patients with 6, 3, 2 individuals harboring these fusions respectively. We show here that a high frequency of fusion transcripts detected at the whole transcriptome level correlates with poor outcome (P<0.0005) in human breast cancer patients. This study demonstrates the ability to detect fusion transcripts as biomarkers from archival FFPE tissues, and the potential prognostic value of the fusion transcripts detected.

Cancer-Patients-United States-Biography is a book subject. It includes 45 books, written by 33 different authors.

The Oncology Information Systems (OIS) market is experiencing robust growth, projected to reach $3.0 billion in 2025 and maintain a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 6.7% from 2025 to 2033. This expansion is driven by several key factors. The increasing prevalence of cancer globally fuels the demand for efficient and comprehensive cancer care management systems. Advances in oncology treatment and research necessitate sophisticated information systems to handle complex patient data, treatment protocols, and clinical trials. Furthermore, the growing emphasis on value-based care and the need for improved patient outcomes are pushing healthcare providers to adopt OIS solutions for better data analysis, resource allocation, and clinical decision-making. The market is segmented into software and services, with software solutions commanding a significant share due to their ability to automate workflows, improve data accuracy, and enhance interoperability between various healthcare systems. Leading companies like Epic Systems Corp., McKesson Corp., and Elekta AB are investing heavily in research and development to enhance their offerings and consolidate their market positions. The competitive landscape is characterized by both established players and emerging innovative firms, leading to continuous advancements and enhanced functionality within the OIS sector. The regional distribution of the OIS market reflects the global cancer burden and healthcare infrastructure. North America, particularly the US, currently holds the largest market share, driven by high healthcare expenditure and technological advancements. However, regions like Asia-Pacific (APAC), specifically China and India, are witnessing rapid growth due to rising cancer incidence and increasing investments in healthcare IT infrastructure. Europe, with countries like Germany and the UK, also represents a significant market segment. While South America and the Middle East & Africa exhibit comparatively lower market penetration, the potential for growth remains considerable, given the increasing awareness about cancer and improving healthcare accessibility. The continued adoption of electronic health records (EHRs), the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology care, and the increasing focus on precision oncology are expected to further fuel the expansion of the OIS market in the coming years. However, challenges such as high implementation costs, data security concerns, and the need for ongoing system maintenance may act as potential restraints to market growth.