Colleges and universities in the United States are still a popular study destination for Chinese students, with around 277 thousand choosing to take courses there in the 2023/24 academic year. Although numbers were heavily affected by the coronavirus pandemic, China is still the leading source of international students in the U.S. education market, accounting for 24.6 percent of all incoming students. The education exodus Mathematics and computer science courses led the field in terms of what Chinese students were studying in the United States, followed by engineering and business & management programs. The vast majority of Chinese students were self-funded, wth the remainder receiving state-funding to complete their overseas studies. Tuition fees can run into the tens of thousands of U.S. dollars, as foreign students usually pay out-of-state tuition fees. What about the local situation? Although studying abroad attracts many Chinese students, the country itself boasts the largest state-run education system in the world. With modernization of the national tertiary education system being a top priority for the Chinese government, the country has seen a significant increase in the number of local universities over the last decade. Enrolments in these universities exceeded 37 million in 2023, and a record of more than ten million students graduated in the same year, indicating that China's education market is still expanding.

Context

More international students are flocking to China than ever before. According to a report, over 540,000 foreigners studied in China in 2018 – marking a 40 percent increase from 2012. China attracts more international students than any other Asian power and ranks third globally, behind the United States and the United Kingdom.

Content

In 2018 there were a total of 492,185 international students from 196 countries/areas pursuing their studies in 1,004 higher education institutions in China’s 31 provinces/autonomous regions/provincial-level municipalities, marking an increase of 3,013 students or 0.62% compared to 2017. International students in Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan are not included in the datasets. The datasets contain three CSV files (Continent, Country, Province) with different data about international students in China.

Columns Description

@Continent (Number/percent of international students by continent) Continent- The name of continent Number - The number of total international students Deaths- The percentage of total international students

@Country (Number of international students by country of origin) Rank- The rank of the country based on total students in China Country- The name of the country Number- The number of total international students

@Province (The top provinces/cities with the largest number of international students) Province- The name of the city/province Number- The number of total international students

Acknowledgements

This data collected from moe.gov.cn.

Inspiration

Currently, I'm studying at a Chinese university. Every year many international students come to China for their higher study, and the ratio of international students is growing steadily. This data will help us to understand the ratio of international students in China.

While scholarship has addressed issues around serving international students in U.S. libraries, until recently, relatively little attention has been directly focused upon the library needs of specific ethnic groups. This study surveys 83 Chinese students and scholars after they returned from studying at universities in the United States to measure and document their satisfaction with the library services and resources they used during their study abroad. Results of the survey are analyzed with the goal of benchmarking and improving services for this growing library user population in the United States.

Description

This dataset provides monthly economic indicators examining the relationship between US protectionist trade policies and Chinese economic growth from May 2022 to May 2025. The dataset can be used for academic research, statistical analysis, and educational purposes in international economics and trade policy studies.

Context

The dataset captures the economic dynamics during a period of heightened trade tensions between the United States and China. It includes comprehensive indicators of US protectionist measures and their potential impact on various dimensions of Chinese economic performance.

Dataset Structure

Time Period: May 2022 - May 2025 Frequency: Monthly Total Observations: 1127 Total Variables: 14

Column Descriptions

Date

• Type: Categorical (YYYY-MM format)
• Description: Month and year of observation

US Protectionism Indicators

US_Tariff_Index

• Type: Continuous
• Range: 100-120
• Description: Tariff rate index where 100 represents the baseline. Higher values indicate increased protectionist measures.

US_Trade_Restrictions

• Type: Discrete
• Range: 5-15
• Description: Number of new trade restrictions implemented per month, including tariffs, quotas, and non-tariff barriers.

US_AntiDumping_Cases

• Type: Discrete
• Range: 0-12
• Description: Number of anti-dumping cases filed against Chinese products per month.

US_Trade_Policy_Uncertainty

-Type: Continuous - Range: 90-160 - Description: Index measuring uncertainty in trade policy (0-200 scale). Higher values indicate greater uncertainty.

Chinese Growth Indicators

China_GDP_Growth_YoY

• Type: Continuous
• Unit: Percentage (%)
• Range: 3.5-5.5%
• Description: Year-over-year GDP growth rate for China.

China_Industrial_Production_YoY

• Type: Continuous
• Unit: Percentage (%)
• Range: 2.5-5.0%
• Description: Year-over-year change in industrial production output.

China_Exports_Growth_YoY

• Type: Continuous
• Unit: Percentage (%)
• Range: 0-15%
• Description: Year-over-year growth rate of Chinese exports.

China_Manufacturing_PMI

• Type: Continuous
• Range: 47-52
• Description: Purchasing Managers' Index for manufacturing sector. Values >50 indicate expansion, <50 indicate contraction.

China_FDI_Inflow_USD_Billion

• Type: Continuous
• Unit: Billion USD
• Range: 7-15
• Description: Monthly foreign direct investment inflows into China.

Bilateral Trade Indicators

US_China_Trade_Volume_USD_Billion

• Type: Continuous
• Unit: Billion USD
• Range: 40-60
• Description: Total monthly bilateral trade volume between US and China.

US_Trade_Deficit_China_USD_Billion

• Type: Continuous
• Unit: Billion USD
• Range: -32 to -24
• Description: US trade deficit with China. Negative values indicate deficit.

Additional Economic Indicators

USD_CNY_Exchange_Rate

• Type: Continuous
• Range: 6.7-7.3
• Description: Exchange rate expressing yuan per US dollar.

China_Stock_Index

• Type: Continuous
• Range: 2,800-3,500
• Description: Shanghai Composite Stock Index (normalized).

United States Imports from China was US$462.62 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from China - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on December of 2025.

Foreign Exchange Reserves in China increased to 3343000 USD Million in October from 3339000 USD Million in September of 2025. This dataset provides - China Foreign Exchange Reserves - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

Key information about China Foreign Direct Investment

• China Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) increased by 8.5 USD bn in Sep 2025, compared with an increase of 17.4 USD bn in the previous quarter.
• China Foreign Direct Investment: USD mn net flows data is updated quarterly, available from Mar 1998 to Sep 2025.
• The data reached an all-time high of 107.2 USD bn in Mar 2022 and a record low of -15.0 USD bn in Jun 2024.

• In the latest reports of China, Current Account recorded a surplus of 195.6 USD bn in Sep 2025.
• China Direct Investment Abroad expanded by 39.9 USD bn in Sep 2025.
• Its Foreign Portfolio Investment increased by 8.3 USD bn in Jun 2025.
• The country's Nominal GDP was reported at 4,953.4 USD bn in Sep 2025.

How do foreign rivals perceive and respond to heightened domestic polarization in the United States? The conventional thinking is that polarization weakens and distracts the U.S., emboldening its adversaries. However, untested assumptions underlie this claim. We use two strategies to explore mechanisms linking domestic polarization and international rivalry. First, we field a survey experiment in China to examine how heightening perceptions of U.S. polarization affects public attitudes towards Chinese foreign policy. Second, we investigate how U.S. rival governments responded to an episode of extreme partisanship: the U.S. Capitol attacks on January 6, 2021. Drawing on ICEWS event data, we explore whether foreign rivals increased hostility towards the U.S. following the Capitol riots. Both studies fail to show robust evidence for the emboldening hypothesis. Extreme polarization has other negative consequences for American foreign policy, but we find no evidence that it makes adversaries materially more assertive towards the United States.

China Imports from United States was US$164.59 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. China Imports from United States - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on December of 2025.

This data package includes the underlying data and programs to replicate the calculations, regressions, charts, and tables presented in Collateral benefits? South Korean exports to the United States and the US-China trade war, PIIE Policy Brief 21-18.

If you use the data, please cite as: Lovely, Mary E., David Xu, and Yinhan Zhang. 2021. Collateral benefits? South Korean exports to the United States and the US-China trade war. PIIE Policy Brief 21-18. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

This dataset includes the data for Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Spring 2024 survey. This dataset is based on surveys conducted in 35 countries on six continents. The data draws on nationally representative surveys of 41,503 adults conducted from Jan. 5 to May 22, 2024. All surveys were conducted over the phone with adults in Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Malaysia, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Surveys were conducted face-to-face in Argentina, Bangladesh, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ghana, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Kenya, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, the Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Tunisia and Turkey. In Australia, we used a mixed-mode, probability-based online panel. This project was produced by Pew Research Center as part of the Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures project, which analyzes religious change and its impact on societies around the world. Funding for the Global Religious Futures project comes from The Pew Charitable Trusts and the John Templeton Foundation (grant 63095). This publication does not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. For information about datasets from U.S. surveys that asked questions which aligned with this international survey, consult the materials in this dataset package.

Hcropland30:A 30-m global cropland map by leveraging global land cover products and Landsat data based on a deep learning model

***Please note this dataset is undergoing peer review***

Version: 1.0

Authors: Qiong Hu ^{a, 1}, Zhiwen Cai ^{b, 1}, Liangzhi You ^{c, d}, Steffen Fritz ^e, Xinyu Zhang ^c, He Yin ^f, Haodong Wei^c, Jingya Yang ^g, Zexuan Li ^a, Qiangyi Yu ^g, Hao Wu ^a, Baodong Xu ^{b *}, Wenbin Wu ^{g, *}

^a Key Laboratory for Geographical Process Analysis & Simulation of Hubei Province/College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

^b College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

^c Macro Agriculture Research Institute, College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

^d International Food Policy Research Institute, 1201 I Street, NW, Washington, DC 20005, USA

^e Novel Data Ecosystems for sustainability Research Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlossplatz 1, Laxenburg A-2361, Austria

^f Department of Geography, Kent State University, 325 S. Lincoln Street, Kent, OH 44242, USA

^g State Key Laboratory of Efficient Utilization of Arid and Semi-arid Arable Land in Northern China, the Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Introduction

We are pleased to introduce a comprehensive global cropland mapping dataset (named Hcropland30) in 2020, meticulously curated to support a wide range of research and analysis applications related to agricultural land and environmental assessment. This dataset encompasses the entire globe, divided into 16,284 grids, each measuring an area of 1°×1°. Hcropland30 was produced by leveraging global land cover products and Landsat data based on a deep learning model. Initially, we established a hierarchal sampling strategy that used the simulated annealing method to identify the representative 1°×1° grids globally and the sparse point-level samples within these selected 1°×1°grids. Subsequently, we employed an ensemble learning technique to expand these sparse point-level samples into the densely pixel-wise labels, creating the area-level 1°×1° cropland labels. These area-level labels were then used to train a U-Net model for predicting global cropland distribution, followed by a comprehensive evaluation of the mapping accuracy.

Dataset

1. Hcropland30: A hybrid 30-m global cropland map in 2020

****Data format: GeoTiff

****Spatial resolution: 30 m

****Projection: EPSG: 4326 (WGS84)

****Values: 1 denotes cropland and 0 denotes non-cropland

The dataset has been uploaded in 16,284 tiles. The extent of each tile can be found in the file of “Grids.shp”. Each file is named according to the grid’s Id number. For example, “000015.tif” corresponds to the cropland mapping result for the 15-th 1°×1° grid. This systematic naming convention ensures easy identification and retrieval of the specific grid data.

2. 1°×1° Grids: This file contains all 16,284 1°×1° grids used in the dataset. The vector file includes 18 attribute fields, providing comprehensive metadata for each grid. These attributes are essential for users who need detailed information about each grid’s characteristics.

****Data format: ESRI shapefile

****Projection: EPSG: 4326 (WGS84)

****Attribute Fields:

Id: The grid’s ID number.

area: The area of the grid.

mode: Indicates the representative sample grid.

climate: The climate type the grid belongs to.

dem: Average DEM value of the grid.

ndvi_s1 to ndvi_s4: Average NDVI values for four seasons within the grid.

esa, esri, fcs30, fromglc, glad, globeland30: Proportion of cropland pixels of different publicly available cropland products.

inconsistent: Proportion of inconsistent pixels within the grid according to different public cropland products.

hcropland30: Proportion of cropland pixels of our Hcropland30 dataset.

3. Samples: The selected representative pixel-level samples, including 32,343 cropland and 67657 non-cropland samples. The category information of each sample was determined based on visual interpretation on Google Earth image and three-year NDVI time series curves from 2019-2021.

****Data format: ESRI shapefile

****Projection: EPSG: 4326 (WGS84)

****Attribute Fields:

type: 1 denotes cropland sample and 0 denotes non-cropland sample.

Citation

If you use this dataset, please cite the following paper:

Hu, Q., Cai, Z., You, L., Fritz, S., Zhang, X., Yin, H., Wei, H., Yang, J., Li, Z., Yu, Q., Wu, H., Xu, B., Wu, W. (2024). Hcropland30: A 30-m global cropland map by leveraging global land cover products and Landsat data based on a deep learning model, Remote Sensing of Environment, submitted.

License

The data is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Disclaimer

This dataset is provided as-is, without any warranty, express or implied. The dataset author is not

responsible for any errors or omissions in the data, or for any consequences arising from the use

of the data.

Contact

If you have any questions or feedback regarding the dataset, please contact the dataset author

Qiong Hu (huqiong@ccnu.edu.cn)

This paper investigates the effects of United States sanctions on Chinese public and private overseas foreign direct investment (FDI). Using data for up to 112 developing countries from 2005-2015, we find that Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely to invest in countries threatened or targeted with U.S. sanctions relative to Chinese privately-owned enterprises (POEs) because they have the Chinese government’s backing and are larger in number and size, motivating them to invest in higher-risk states. The Chinese government also reaps political benefits by Chinese SOEs investing abroad, enhancing China’s economic strength and decreasing its rivals’ influence. We also obtain similar results for Chinese SOEs and POEs regardless of the investment sector and conduct additional robustness checks that further reinforce the main findings. Our study provides insights into how China’s overseas FDI increases its economic and political reach across the globe at the possible expense of the U.S.

Foreign Direct Investment in China increased by 507 USD Hundred Million in August of 2025. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - China Foreign Direct Investment - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

China Exports to United States was US$525.65 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. China Exports to United States - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on November of 2025.

United States Imports from China of Electrical, electronic equipment was US$127.06 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from China of Electrical, electronic equipment - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on December of 2025.

China recorded a trade surplus of 90.07 USD Billion in October of 2025. This dataset provides - China Balance of Trade - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

China's total Exports in 2024 were valued at US$3.58 Trillion, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. China's main export partners were: the United States, Hong Kong and Vietnam. The top three export commodities were: Electrical, electronic equipment; Machinery, nuclear reactors, boilers and Vehicles other than railway, tramway. Total Imports were valued at US$2.59 Trillion. In 2024, China had a trade surplus of US$991.41 Billion.

United States Imports from China of Pharmaceutical products was US$7.84 Billion during 2024, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. United States Imports from China of Pharmaceutical products - data, historical chart and statistics - was last updated on December of 2025.

China's total Imports in 2024 were valued at US$2.59 Trillion, according to the United Nations COMTRADE database on international trade. China's main import partners were: South Korea, the United States and Japan. The top three import commodities were: Electrical, electronic equipment; Mineral fuels, oils, distillation products and Ores slag and ash. Total Exports were valued at US$3.58 Trillion. In 2024, China had a trade surplus of US$991.41 Billion.