Sustainable cities depend on urban forests. City trees -- a pillar of urban forests -- improve our health, clean the air, store CO2, and cool local temperatures. Comparatively less is known about urban forests as ecosystems, particularly their spatial composition, nativity statuses, biodiversity, and tree health. Here, we assembled and standardized a new dataset of N=5,660,237 trees from 63 of the largest US cities. The data comes from tree inventories conducted at the level of cities and/or neighborhoods. Each data sheet includes detailed information on tree location, species, nativity status (whether a tree species is naturally occurring or introduced), health, size, whether it is in a park or urban area, and more (comprising 28 standardized columns per datasheet). This dataset could be analyzed in combination with citizen-science datasets on bird, insect, or plant biodiversity; social and demographic data; or data on the physical environment. Urban forests offer a rare opportunity to intentionally design biodiverse, heterogenous, rich ecosystems.

NOTE: A more current version of the Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is available: PAD-US 3.0 https://doi.org/10.5066/P9Q9LQ4B. The USGS Protected Areas Database of the United States (PAD-US) is the nation's inventory of protected areas, including public land and voluntarily provided private protected areas, identified as an A-16 National Geospatial Data Asset in the Cadastre Theme (https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-cadastre/). The PAD-US is an ongoing project with several published versions of a spatial database including areas dedicated to the preservation of biological diversity, and other natural (including extraction), recreational, or cultural uses, managed for these purposes through legal or other effective means. The database was originally designed to support biodiversity assessments; however, its scope expanded in recent years to include all public and nonprofit lands and waters. Most are public lands owned in fee (the owner of the property has full and irrevocable ownership of the land); however, long-term easements, leases, agreements, Congressional (e.g. 'Wilderness Area'), Executive (e.g. 'National Monument'), and administrative designations (e.g. 'Area of Critical Environmental Concern') documented in agency management plans are also included. The PAD-US strives to be a complete inventory of public land and other protected areas, compiling “best available” data provided by managing agencies and organizations. The PAD-US geodatabase maps and describes areas using over twenty-five attributes and five feature classes representing the U.S. protected areas network in separate feature classes: Fee (ownership parcels), Designation, Easement, Marine, Proclamation and Other Planning Boundaries. Five additional feature classes include various combinations of the primary layers (for example, Combined_Fee_Easement) to support data management, queries, web mapping services, and analyses. This PAD-US Version 2.1 dataset includes a variety of updates and new data from the previous Version 2.0 dataset (USGS, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5066/P955KPLE ), achieving the primary goal to "Complete the PAD-US Inventory by 2020" (https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/science/pad-us-vision) by addressing known data gaps with newly available data. The following list summarizes the integration of "best available" spatial data to ensure public lands and other protected areas from all jurisdictions are represented in PAD-US, along with continued improvements and regular maintenance of the federal theme. Completing the PAD-US Inventory: 1) Integration of over 75,000 city parks in all 50 States (and the District of Columbia) from The Trust for Public Land's (TPL) ParkServe data development initiative (https://parkserve.tpl.org/) added nearly 2.7 million acres of protected area and significantly reduced the primary known data gap in previous PAD-US versions (local government lands). 2) First-time integration of the Census American Indian/Alaskan Native Areas (AIA) dataset (https://www2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2019/AIANNH) representing the boundaries for federally recognized American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands across the nation (as of January 1, 2020, as reported by the federally recognized tribal governments through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey) addressed another major PAD-US data gap. 3) Aggregation of nearly 5,000 protected areas owned by local land trusts in 13 states, aggregated by Ducks Unlimited through data calls for easements to update the National Conservation Easement Database (https://www.conservationeasement.us/), increased PAD-US protected areas by over 350,000 acres. Maintaining regular Federal updates: 1) Major update of the Federal estate (fee ownership parcels, easement interest, and management designations), including authoritative data from 8 agencies: Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Census Bureau (Census), Department of Defense (DOD), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), National Park Service (NPS), Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S. Forest Service (USFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The federal theme in PAD-US is developed in close collaboration with the Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) Federal Lands Working Group (FLWG, https://communities.geoplatform.gov/ngda-govunits/federal-lands-workgroup/); 2) Complete National Marine Protected Areas (MPA) update: from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) MPA Inventory, including conservation measure ('GAP Status Code', 'IUCN Category') review by NOAA; Other changes: 1) PAD-US field name change - The "Public Access" field name changed from 'Access' to 'Pub_Access' to avoid unintended scripting errors associated with the script command 'access'. 2) Additional field - The "Feature Class" (FeatClass) field was added to all layers within PAD-US 2.1 (only included in the "Combined" layers of PAD-US 2.0 to describe which feature class data originated from). 3) Categorical GAP Status Code default changes - National Monuments are categorically assigned GAP Status Code = 2 (previously GAP 3), in the absence of other information, to better represent biodiversity protection restrictions associated with the designation. The Bureau of Land Management Areas of Environmental Concern (ACECs) are categorically assigned GAP Status Code = 3 (previously GAP 2) as the areas are administratively protected, not permanent. More information is available upon request. 4) Agency Name (FWS) geodatabase domain description changed to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (previously U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service). 5) Select areas in the provisional PAD-US 2.1 Proclamation feature class were removed following a consultation with the data-steward (Census Bureau). Tribal designated statistical areas are purely a geographic area for providing Census statistics with no land base. Most affected areas are relatively small; however, 4,341,120 acres and 37 records were removed in total. Contact Mason Croft (masoncroft@boisestate) for more information about how to identify these records. For more information regarding the PAD-US dataset please visit, https://usgs.gov/gapanalysis/PAD-US/. For more information about data aggregation please review the Online PAD-US Data Manual available at https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/science-analytics-and-synthesis/gap/pad-us-data-manual .

The 2020 cartographic boundary shapefiles are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. In New England (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and Vermont), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has defined an alternative county subdivision (generally cities and towns) based definition of Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) known as New England City and Town Areas (NECTAs). NECTAs are defined using the same criteria as Metropolitan Statistical Areas and Micropolitan Statistical Areas and are identified as either metropolitan or micropolitan, based, respectively, on the presence of either an urban area of 50,000 or more population or an urban cluster of at least 10,000 and less than 50,000 population. A NECTA containing a single core urban area with a population of at least 2.5 million may be subdivided to form smaller groupings of cities and towns referred to as NECTA Divisions. The generalized boundaries in this file are based on those defined by OMB based on the 2010 Census, published in 2013, and updated in 2018.

A dataset listing Colorado cities by population for 2024.

About this dataset

Context

The dataset tabulates the California population over the last 20 plus years. It lists the population for each year, along with the year on year change in population, as well as the change in percentage terms for each year. The dataset can be utilized to understand the population change of California across the last two decades. For example, using this dataset, we can identify if the population is declining or increasing. If there is a change, when the population peaked, or if it is still growing and has not reached its peak. We can also compare the trend with the overall trend of United States population over the same period of time.

Key observations

In 2024, the population of California was 39.43 million, a 0.59% increase year-by-year from 2023. Previously, in 2023, California population was 39.2 million, an increase of 0.14% compared to a population of 39.14 million in 2022. Over the last 20 plus years, between 2000 and 2024, population of California increased by 5.44 million. In this period, the peak population was 39.52 million in the year 2020. The numbers suggest that the population has already reached its peak and is showing a trend of decline. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program (PEP).

Data Coverage:

• From 2000 to 2024

Variables / Data Columns

• Year: This column displays the data year (Measured annually and for years 2000 to 2024)
• Population: The population for the specific year for the California is shown in this column.
• Year on Year Change: This column displays the change in California population for each year compared to the previous year.
• Change in Percent: This column displays the year on year change as a percentage. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Recommended for further research

This dataset is a part of the main dataset for California Population by Year. You can refer the same here

Metropolitan DivisionsThis feature layer, utilizing National Geospatial Data Asset (NGDA) data from the U.S. Census Bureau (USCB), displays Metropolitan Divisions within the United States. According to the USCB, "Metropolitan Divisions subdivide a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) containing a single core urban area that has a population of at least 2.5 million to form smaller groupings of counties or equivalent entities. Not all MSAs with urban areas of this size will contain Metropolitan Divisions. Not all MSAs with urban areas of this size will contain Metropolitan Divisions. Metropolitan Division are defined by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and consist of one or more main counties or equivalent entities that represent an employment center or centers, plus adjacent counties associated with the main county or counties through commuting ties."Nassau County-Suffolk County, NY Metro Division & New Brunswick-Lakewood, NJ Metro DivisionData currency: This cached Esri federal service is checked weekly for updates from its enterprise federal source (Metropolitan Divisions) and will support mapping, analysis, data exports and OGC API – Feature access.NGDAID: 83 (Series Information for Metropolitan Division National TIGER/Line Shapefiles, Current)OGC API Features Link: (Metropolitan Divisions - OGC Features) copy this link to embed it in OGC Compliant viewersFor more information, please visit: Geographic LevelsFor feedback please contact: Esri_US_Federal_Data@esri.comNGDA Data SetThis data set is part of the NGDA Governmental Units, and Administrative and Statistical Boundaries Theme Community. Per the Federal Geospatial Data Committee (FGDC), this theme is defined as the "boundaries that delineate geographic areas for uses such as governance and the general provision of services (e.g., states, American Indian reservations, counties, cities, towns, etc.), administration and/or for a specific purpose (e.g., congressional districts, school districts, fire districts, Alaska Native Regional Corporations, etc.), and/or provision of statistical data (census tracts, census blocks, metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas, etc.). Boundaries for these various types of geographic areas are either defined through a documented legal description or through criteria and guidelines. Other boundaries may include international limits, those of federal land ownership, the extent of administrative regions for various federal agencies, as well as the jurisdictional offshore limits of U.S. sovereignty. Boundaries associated solely with natural resources and/or cultural entities are excluded from this theme and are included in the appropriate subject themes."For other NGDA Content: Esri Federal Datasets

There are limited open source data available for determining water production/treatment and required energy for cities across the United States. This database represents the culmination of a two-year effort to obtain data from cities across the United States via open records requests in order to determine the state of the U.S. urban energy-water nexus. Data were requested at the daily or monthly scale when available for 127 cities across the United States, represented by 253 distinct water and sewer districts. Data were requested from cities larger than 100,000 people and from each state. In the case of states that did not have cities that met these criteria, the largest cities in those states were selected. The resulting database represents a drinking water service population of 81.4 million and a wastewater service population of 86.2 million people. Average daily demands for the United States were calculated to be 560 liters per capita for drinking water and 500 liters per capita of wastewater. The embedded energy within each of these resources is 340 kWh/1000 m3 and 430 kWh/1000 m3, respectively. Drinking water data at the annual scale are available for production volume (89 cities) and for embedded energy (73 cities). Annual wastewater data are available for treated volume (104 cities) and embedded energy (90 cities). Monthly data are available for drinking water volume and embedded energy (73 and 56 cities) and wastewater volume and embedded energy (88 and 70 cities). Please see the two related papers for this metadata are included with this submission. Each folder name is a city that contributed data to the collection effort (City+State Abbreviation). Within each folder is a .csv file with drinking water and wastewater volume and energy data. A READ-ME file within each folder details the contents of the folder within any relevant information pertaining to data collection. Data are on the order of a monthly timescale when available, and yearly if not. Please cite the following papers when using the database: Chini, C.M. and Stillwell, A.S. (2017). The State of U.S. Urban Water: Data and the Energy-Water Nexus. Water Resources Research. 54(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR022265 Chini, C.M., and Stillwell, A. (2016). Where are all the data? The case for a comprehensive water and wastewater utility database. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management. 143(3). DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000739

More than 250 million tweets in Spanish from 331 Spanish-speaking cities in Latin America, Spain and the United States were compiled from Twitter. In this data set, a column is provided with the 5000 most frequent words and one with their corresponding frequencies (the number of times the word was produced in that city) for each of the 331 cities. The reported data correspond to the years 2009 to 2016.

A dataset listing New Mexico cities by population for 2024.

With 56 Million Businesses in the United States of America, Techsalerator has access to the highest B2B count of Data/ Business Data in the country.

Thanks to our unique tools and large data specialist team, we are able to select the ideal targeted dataset based on the unique elements such as sales volume of a company, the company's location, no. of employees etc...

Whether you are looking for an entire fill install, access to our API's or if you are just looking for a one-time targeted purchase, get in touch with our company and we will fulfill your international data need.

We cover all states and cities in the country : Example covered.

All states :

Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho IllinoisIndiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri MontanaNebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon PennsylvaniaRhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming

A few cities : New York City NY Los Angeles CA Chicago IL Houston TX Phoenix AZ Philadelphia PA San Antonio TX San Diego CA Dallas TX Austin TX San Jose CA Fort Worth TX Jacksonville FL Columbus OH Charlotte NC Indianapolis IN San Francisco CA Seattle WA Denver CO Washington DC Boston MA El Paso TX Nashville TN Oklahoma City OK Las Vegas NV Detroit MI Portland OR Memphis TN Louisville KY Milwaukee WI Baltimore MD Albuquerque NM Tucson AZ Mesa AZ Fresno CA Sacramento CA Atlanta GA Kansas City MO Colorado Springs CO Raleigh NC Omaha NE Miami FL Long Beach CA Virginia Beach VA Oakland CA Minneapolis MN Tampa FL Tulsa OK Arlington TX Wichita KS Bakersfield CA Aurora CO New Orleans LA Cleveland OH Anaheim CA Henderson NV Honolulu HI Riverside CA Santa Ana CA Corpus Christi TX Lexington KY San Juan PR Stockton CA St. Paul MN Cincinnati OH Greensboro NC Pittsburgh PA Irvine CA St. Louis MO Lincoln NE Orlando FL Durham NC Plano TX Anchorage AK Newark NJ Chula Vista CA Fort Wayne IN Chandler AZ Toledo OH St. Petersburg FL Reno NV Laredo TX Scottsdale AZ North Las Vegas NV Lubbock TX Madison WI Gilbert AZ Jersey City NJ Glendale AZ Buffalo NY Winston-Salem NC Chesapeake VA Fremont CA Norfolk VA Irving TX Garland TX Paradise NV Arlington VA Richmond VA Hialeah FL Boise ID Spokane WA Frisco TX Moreno Valley CA Tacoma WA Fontana CA Modesto CA Baton Rouge LA Port St. Lucie FL San Bernardino CA McKinney TX Fayetteville NC Santa Clarita CA Des Moines IA Oxnard CA Birmingham AL Spring Valley NV Huntsville AL Rochester NY Cape Coral FL Tempe AZ Grand Rapids MI Yonkers NY Overland Park KS Salt Lake City UT Amarillo TX Augusta GA Columbus GA Tallahassee FL Montgomery AL Huntington Beach CA Akron OH Little Rock AR Glendale CA Grand Prairie TX Aurora IL Sunrise Manor NV Ontario CA Sioux Falls SD Knoxville TN Vancouver WA Mobile AL Worcester MA Chattanooga TN Brownsville TX Peoria AZ Fort Lauderdale FL Shreveport LA Newport News VA Providence RI Elk Grove CA Rancho Cucamonga CA Salem OR Pembroke Pines FL Santa Rosa CA Eugene OR Oceanside CA Cary NC Fort Collins CO Corona CA Enterprise NV Garden Grove CA Springfield MO Clarksville TN Bayamon PR Lakewood CO Alexandria VA Hayward CA Murfreesboro TN Killeen TX Hollywood FL Lancaster CA Salinas CA Jackson MS Midland TX Macon County GA Kansas City KS Palmdale CA Sunnyvale CA Springfield MA Escondido CA Pomona CA Bellevue WA Surprise AZ Naperville IL Pasadena TX Denton TX Roseville CA Joliet IL Thornton CO McAllen TX Paterson NJ Rockford IL Carrollton TX Bridgeport CT Miramar FL Round Rock TX Metairie LA Olathe KS Waco TX

Shark Tank US Dataset Description

This dataset provides comprehensive information about the American business reality television series, Shark Tank, covering seasons 1 to 14. The dataset includes 50 fields/columns and over 1260 records, capturing various details about each episode, pitch, and deal made on the show. Below is a detailed description of the columns included in the dataset:

Columns and Descriptions

• Season Number: The number of the season.
• Episode Number: The episode number within the season.
• Pitch Number: The overall pitch number.
• Original Air Date: The original or first aired date of the episode.
• Startup Name: The name of the startup company.
• Industry: The industry name or type.
• Business Description: A brief description of the business.
• Pitchers Gender: The gender of the pitchers.
• Pitchers City: The US city where the pitchers are from.
• Pitchers State: The US state or country of the pitchers, represented by a two-letter shortcut.
• Pitchers Average Age: The average age of all pitchers, categorized as <30 (young), 30-50 (middle), or >50 (old).
• Entrepreneur Names: The names of the pitchers.
• Company Website: The website of the startup or company.
• Multiple Entrepreneurs: Indicates whether there are multiple entrepreneurs (1 for yes, 0 for no).
• US Viewership: The viewership in the US, TRP rating, in millions.
• Original Ask Amount: The original ask amount in USD.
• Original Offered Equity: The original offered equity in percentages.
• Valuation Requested: The valuation requested in USD.
• Got Deal: Indicates whether the deal was secured (1 for yes, 0 for no).
• Total Deal Amount: The total deal amount in USD.
• Total Deal Equity: The total deal equity in percentages.
• Deal Valuation: The deal valuation in USD.
• Number of sharks in deal: The number of sharks involved in the deal.
• Investment Amount Per Shark: The investment amount per shark.
• Equity Per Shark: The equity received by each shark.
• Royalty Deal: Indicates whether it is a royalty deal or a deal with advisory shares.
• Loan: The loan or debt (line of credit) amount given by sharks, in USD.
• Barbara Corcoran Investment Amount: The amount invested by Barbara Corcoran.
• Barbara Corcoran Investment Equity: The equity received by Barbara Corcoran.
• Mark Cuban Investment Amount: The amount invested by Mark Cuban.
• Mark Cuban Investment Equity: The equity received by Mark Cuban.
• Lori Greiner Investment Amount: The amount invested by Lori Greiner.
• Lori Greiner Investment Equity: The equity received by Lori Greiner.
• Robert Herjavec Investment Amount: The amount invested by Robert Herjavec.
• Robert Herjavec Investment Equity: The equity received by Robert Herjavec.
• Daymond John Investment Amount: The amount invested by Daymond John.
• Daymond John Investment Equity: The equity received by Daymond John.
• Kevin O'Leary Investment Amount: The amount invested by Kevin O'Leary.
• Kevin O'Leary Investment Equity: The equity received by Kevin O'Leary.
• Guest Investment Amount: The amount invested by guest sharks.
• Guest Investment Equity: The equity received by guest sharks.
• Guest Name: The name of the guest shark.
• Barbara Corcoran Present: Indicates whether Barbara Corcoran is present in the episode.
• Mark Cuban Present: Indicates whether Mark Cuban is present in the episode.
• Lori Greiner Present: Indicates whether Lori Greiner is present in the episode.
• Robert Herjavec Present: Indicates whether Robert Herjavec is present in the episode.
• Daymond John Present: Indicates whether Daymond John is present in the episode.
• Kevin O'Leary Present: Indicates whether Kevin O'Leary is present in the episode.

This dataset provides a rich source of information for analyzing the trends, investments, and outcomes of pitches on Shark Tank.

This dataset is comprised of the final assessment rolls submitted to the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance – Office of Real Property Tax Services by 996 local governments. Together, the assessment rolls provide the details of the more than 4.7 million parcels in New York State. The dataset includes assessment rolls for all cities and towns, except New York City. (For New York City assessment roll data, see NYC Open Data [https://opendata.cityofnewyork.us]) For each property, the dataset includes assessed value, full market value, property size, owners, exemption information, and other fields. Tip: For a unique identifier for every property in New York State, combine the SWIS code and print key fields.

A dataset listing Indiana cities by population for 2024.

The Department of Transportation manages over one million traffic signs in New York City. The file includes the location and a description of parking signs throughout the city, a subset of Street Signs Work Orders. The Locations and Signs dataset need to be used in combination. The data in files can be linked, to find an applicable regulation, using the "StatusOrderNumber" value. For a full list of street sign, visit the Street Sign Work Orders dataset: https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Transportation/Street-Sign-Work-Orders/qt6m-xctn Street Sign Interactive Map: https://nycdotsigns.net/

SharkTank dataset of USA/American business reality television series. Currently, the data set has information from SharkTank season 1 to Shark Tank US season 16. The dataset has 53 fields/columns and 1425+ records.

Below are the features/fields in the dataset:

• Season Number - Season number
• Startup Name - Company name or product name
• Episode Number - Episode number within the season
• Pitch Number - Overall pitch number
• Season Start - Season first aired date
• Season End - Season last aired date
• Original Air Date - Episode original/first aired date, on OTT/TV
• Industry - Industry name or type
• Business Description - Business Description
• Company Website - Website of startup/company
• Pitchers Gender - Gender of pitchers
• Pitchers City - US city of pitchers
• Pitchers State - US state or country of pitchers, two letter shortcut
• Pitchers Average Age - Average age of all pitchers, <30 young, 30-50 middle, >50 old
• Entrepreneur Names - Pitcher names
• Multiple Entrepreneurs - Multiple entrepreneurs are present ? 1-yes, 0-no
• US Viewership - Viewership in US, TRP rating, in millions
• Original Ask Amount - Original Ask Amount, in USD
• Original Offered Equity - Original Offered Equity, in percentages
• Valuation Requested - Valuation Requested, in USD
• Got Deal - Got the deal or not, 1-yes, 0-no
• Total Deal Amount - Total Deal Amount, in USD, including debt/loan amount
• Total Deal Equity - Total Deal Equity, in percentages
• Deal Valuation - Deal Valuation, in USD
• Number of sharks in deal - Number of sharks in deal
• Investment Amount Per Shark - Investment Amount Per Shark
• Equity Per Shark - Equity received by each Shark
• Royalty Deal - Is it royalty deal or not (1-yes)
• Advisory Shares Equity - Deal with Advisory shares or equity, in percentages
• Loan - Loan/debt (line of credit) amount given by sharks, in USD
• Deal has conditions - Deal has conditions or not? (yes or no)
• Barbara Corcoran Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Barbara Corcoran
• Barbara Corcoran Investment Equity - Equity received by Barbara Corcoran
• Mark Cuban Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Mark Cuban
• Mark Cuban Investment Equity - Equity received by Mark Cuban
• Lori Greiner Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Lori Greiner
• Lori Greiner Investment Equity - Equity received by Lori Greiner
• Robert Herjavec Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Robert Herjavec
• Robert Herjavec Investment Equity - Equity received by Robert Herjavec
• Daymond John Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Daymond John
• Daymond John Investment Equity - Equity received by Daymond John
• Kevin O Leary Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Kevin O'Leary
• Kevin O Leary Investment Equity - Equity received by Kevin O'Leary
• Guest Investment Amount - Amount Invested by Guests
• Guest Investment Equity - Equity received by Guests
• Guest Name - Name of Guest shark, if invested in deal
• Barbara Corcoran Present - Whether Barbara Corcoran present in episode or not
• Mark Cuban Present - Whether Mark Cuban present in episode or not
• Lori Greiner Present - Whether Lori Greiner present in episode or not
• Robert Herjavec Present - Whether Robert Herjavec present in episode or not
• Daymond John Present - Whether Daymond John present in episode or not
• Kevin O Leary Present - Whether Kevin O Leary present in episode or not
• Guest Present - Whether Guest present in episode or not

The Ports and Port Statistical Areas dataset is periodically updated by the United States Army Corp of Engineers (USACE) and is part of the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)/Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) National Transportation Atlas Database (NTAD). Per Engineering Regulation 1130-2-520, USACE’s NDC and WCSC are responsible for collecting, compiling, printing, and distributing all domestic waterborne commerce statistics for which the USACE has responsibility. Per a 1998 Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memorandum, the WCSC inherited the requirement to include foreign waterborne commerce formally executed by the U.S. Census Bureau. Performance of this work is in accordance with the Rivers and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1922 (33 USC 555). Engineering Regulation 1130-2-520 defines a port as: (1) Port limits defined by legislative enactments of state, county, or city governments. (2) The corporate limits of a municipality. A data dictionary, or other source of attribute information, is accessible at https://doi.org/10.21949/2ngc-4984

A dataset listing Utah cities by population for 2024.

This table contains data on income inequality. The primary measure is the Gini index – a measure of the extent to which the distribution of income among families/households within a community deviates from a perfectly equal distribution. The index ranges from 0.0, when all families (households) have equal shares of income (implies perfect equality), to 1.0 when one family (household) has all the income and the rest have none (implies perfect inequality). Index data is provided for California and its counties, regions, and large cities/towns. The data is from the U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey. The table is part of a series of indicators in the Healthy Communities Data and Indicators Project of the Office of Health Equity. Income is linked to acquiring resources for healthy living. Both household income and the distribution of income across a society independently contribute to the overall health status of a community. On average Western industrialized nations with large disparities in income distribution tend to have poorer health status than similarly advanced nations with a more equitable distribution of income. Approximately 119,200 (5%) of the 2.4 million U.S. deaths in 2000 are attributable to income inequality. The pathways by which income inequality act to increase adverse health outcomes are not known with certainty, but policies that provide for a strong safety net of health and social services have been identified as potential buffers. More information about the data table and a data dictionary can be found in the About/Attachments section.

Analysis of the projects proposed by the seven finalists to USDOT's Smart City Challenge, including challenge addressed, proposed project category, and project description.

The time reported for the speed profiles are between 2:00PM to 8:00PM in increments of 10 minutes.

Abstract

Gallup Worldwide Research continually surveys residents in more than 150 countries, representing more than 98% of the world's adult population, using randomly selected, nationally representative samples. Gallup typically surveys 1,000 individuals in each country, using a standard set of core questions that has been translated into the major languages of the respective country. In some regions, supplemental questions are asked in addition to core questions. Face-to-face interviews are approximately 1 hour, while telephone interviews are about 30 minutes. In many countries, the survey is conducted once per year, and fieldwork is generally completed in two to four weeks. The Country Dataset Details spreadsheet displays each country's sample size, month/year of the data collection, mode of interviewing, languages employed, design effect, margin of error, and details about sample coverage.

Gallup is entirely responsible for the management, design, and control of Gallup Worldwide Research. For the past 70 years, Gallup has been committed to the principle that accurately collecting and disseminating the opinions and aspirations of people around the globe is vital to understanding our world. Gallup's mission is to provide information in an objective, reliable, and scientifically grounded manner. Gallup is not associated with any political orientation, party, or advocacy group and does not accept partisan entities as clients. Any individual, institution, or governmental agency may access the Gallup Worldwide Research regardless of nationality. The identities of clients and all surveyed respondents will remain confidential.

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

SAMPLING AND DATA COLLECTION METHODOLOGY With some exceptions, all samples are probability based and nationally representative of the resident population aged 15 and older. The coverage area is the entire country including rural areas, and the sampling frame represents the entire civilian, non-institutionalized, aged 15 and older population of the entire country. Exceptions include areas where the safety of interviewing staff is threatened, scarcely populated islands in some countries, and areas that interviewers can reach only by foot, animal, or small boat.

Telephone surveys are used in countries where telephone coverage represents at least 80% of the population or is the customary survey methodology (see the Country Dataset Details for detailed information for each country). In Central and Eastern Europe, as well as in the developing world, including much of Latin America, the former Soviet Union countries, nearly all of Asia, the Middle East, and Africa, an area frame design is used for face-to-face interviewing.

The typical Gallup Worldwide Research survey includes at least 1,000 surveys of individuals. In some countries, oversamples are collected in major cities or areas of special interest. Additionally, in some large countries, such as China and Russia, sample sizes of at least 2,000 are collected. Although rare, in some instances the sample size is between 500 and 1,000. See the Country Dataset Details for detailed information for each country.

FACE-TO-FACE SURVEY DESIGN

FIRST STAGE In countries where face-to-face surveys are conducted, the first stage of sampling is the identification of 100 to 135 ultimate clusters (Sampling Units), consisting of clusters of households. Sampling units are stratified by population size and or geography and clustering is achieved through one or more stages of sampling. Where population information is available, sample selection is based on probabilities proportional to population size, otherwise simple random sampling is used. Samples are drawn independent of any samples drawn for surveys conducted in previous years.

There are two methods for sample stratification:

METHOD 1: The sample is stratified into 100 to 125 ultimate clusters drawn proportional to the national population, using the following strata: 1) Areas with population of at least 1 million 2) Areas 500,000-999,999 3) Areas 100,000-499,999 4) Areas 50,000-99,999 5) Areas 10,000-49,999 6) Areas with less than 10,000

The strata could include additional stratum to reflect populations that exceed 1 million as well as areas with populations less than 10,000. Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook Copyright © 2008-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 8

METHOD 2:

A multi-stage design is used. The country is first stratified by large geographic units, and then by smaller units within geography. A minimum of 33 Primary Sampling Units (PSUs), which are first stage sampling units, are selected. The sample design results in 100 to 125 ultimate clusters.

SECOND STAGE

Random route procedures are used to select sampled households. Unless an outright refusal occurs, interviewers make up to three attempts to survey the sampled household. To increase the probability of contact and completion, attempts are made at different times of the day, and where possible, on different days. If an interviewer cannot obtain an interview at the initial sampled household, he or she uses a simple substitution method. Refer to Appendix C for a more in-depth description of random route procedures.

THIRD STAGE

Respondents are randomly selected within the selected households. Interviewers list all eligible household members and their ages or birthdays. The respondent is selected by means of the Kish grid (refer to Appendix C) in countries where face-to-face interviewing is used. The interview does not inform the person who answers the door of the selection criteria until after the respondent has been identified. In a few Middle East and Asian countries where cultural restrictions dictate gender matching, respondents are randomly selected using the Kish grid from among all eligible adults of the matching gender.

TELEPHONE SURVEY DESIGN

In countries where telephone interviewing is employed, random-digit-dial (RDD) or a nationally representative list of phone numbers is used. In select countries where cell phone penetration is high, a dual sampling frame is used. Random respondent selection is achieved by using either the latest birthday or Kish grid method. At least three attempts are made to reach a person in each household, spread over different days and times of day. Appointments for callbacks that fall within the survey data collection period are made.

PANEL SURVEY DESIGN

Prior to 2009, United States data were collected using The Gallup Panel. The Gallup Panel is a probability-based, nationally representative panel, for which all members are recruited via random-digit-dial methodology and is only used in the United States. Participants who elect to join the panel are committing to the completion of two to three surveys per month, with the typical survey lasting 10 to 15 minutes. The Gallup Worldwide Research panel survey is conducted over the telephone and takes approximately 30 minutes. No incentives are given to panel participants. Worldwide Research Methodology and Codebook Copyright © 2008-2012 Gallup, Inc. All rights reserved. 9

Research instrument

QUESTION DESIGN

Many of the Worldwide Research questions are items that Gallup has used for years. When developing additional questions, Gallup employed its worldwide network of research and political scientists1 to better understand key issues with regard to question development and construction and data gathering. Hundreds of items were developed, tested, piloted, and finalized. The best questions were retained for the core questionnaire and organized into indexes. Most items have a simple dichotomous ("yes or no") response set to minimize contamination of data because of cultural differences in response styles and to facilitate cross-cultural comparisons.

The Gallup Worldwide Research measures key indicators such as Law and Order, Food and Shelter, Job Creation, Migration, Financial Wellbeing, Personal Health, Civic Engagement, and Evaluative Wellbeing and demonstrates their correlations with world development indicators such as GDP and Brain Gain. These indicators assist leaders in understanding the broad context of national interests and establishing organization-specific correlations between leading indexes and lagging economic outcomes.

Gallup organizes its core group of indicators into the Gallup World Path. The Path is an organizational conceptualization of the seven indexes and is not to be construed as a causal model. The individual indexes have many properties of a strong theoretical framework. A more in-depth description of the questions and Gallup indexes is included in the indexes section of this document. In addition to World Path indexes, Gallup Worldwide Research questions also measure opinions about national institutions, corruption, youth development, community basics, diversity, optimism, communications, religiosity, and numerous other topics. For many regions of the world, additional questions that are specific to that region or country are included in surveys. Region-specific questions have been developed for predominantly Muslim nations, former Soviet Union countries, the Balkans, sub-Saharan Africa, Latin America, China and India, South Asia, and Israel and the Palestinian Territories.

The questionnaire is translated into the major conversational languages of each country. The translation process starts with an English, French, or Spanish version, depending on the region. One of two translation methods may be used.

METHOD 1: Two independent translations are completed. An independent third party, with some knowledge of survey research methods, adjudicates the differences. A professional translator translates the final version back into the source language.

METHOD 2: A translator