Corporate Profits in the United States decreased to 3203.60 USD Billion in the first quarter of 2025 from 3312 USD Billion in the fourth quarter of 2024. This dataset provides the latest reported value for - United States Corporate Profits - plus previous releases, historical high and low, short-term forecast and long-term prediction, economic calendar, survey consensus and news.

This data contains all Corporations and Other Entity filings in the Department of State electronic database. Each record contains the Department of State ID number, Filing ID, Date Filed, Effective Date, Entity Name, the law under which the filing was made and other pertinent filing information.

Listing of all active businesses currently registered with the Office of Finance. An "active" business is defined as a registered business whose owner has not notified the Office of Finance of a cease of business operations. Update Interval: Monthly. NAICS Codes are from 2007 NAICS: https://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/sssd/naics/naicsrch?chart=2007

In a 2024 survey of small business leaders and IT professionals in the United States, 58 percent of respondents stated that employee data was their most compromised company data in cyberattacks. Additionally, 53 percent of respondents reported customer or consumer data as the second most impacted company data.

A survey conducted from April to May 2022 found that six in 10 organizations in the United States designated an internal project manager or owner to manage compliance with state-level privacy laws. Around half of the organizations conducted data mapping and had an understanding of data practices across the organization. A further 41 percent said they updated privacy policies, while 40 percent said they were in the process of doing so.

According to an analysis conducted in 2023 of over *** companies targeting children and families in the United States, only ** percent of the businesses had a privacy-protective mindset and did not sell data. Under the California Privacy Rights Act amendment, companies are supposed to disclose if they sell users' personal data. Around ** percent of companies did not disclose whether they engaged in such practices.

The dataset exists to observe the entrepreneurial activity of Austin over a long time period. The data comes from the U.S. Census County Business Pattern table and is capturing data at the Travis County level. It contains the cumulative count of firms by employee size and count of firms by employee size by industry. This data can be used to see changes of employer growth by industry; to project where workforce growth could be occurring; or to simply see how many small businesses there are in Austin. View more details and insights related to this data set on the story page: data.austintexas.gov/stories/s/ndb5-si22

Graph and download economic data for Quarterly Financial Report: U.S. Corporations: All Manufacturing: Total Assets (QFR223MFGUSNO) from Q4 2000 to Q1 2025 about finance, corporate, assets, manufacturing, industry, and USA.

According to a 2024 survey of small business leaders and IT professionals in the United States, ** percent of small companies experienced both security breaches and data breaches in the examined year. In comparison, ** percent of companies reported not having suffered from any of these cyberattacks.

United States - Total Business Sales was 1733841.00000 Mil. of $ in February of 2025, according to the United States Federal Reserve. Historically, United States - Total Business Sales reached a record high of 1974148.00000 in December of 2024 and a record low of 478951.00000 in January of 1992. Trading Economics provides the current actual value, an historical data chart and related indicators for United States - Total Business Sales - last updated from the United States Federal Reserve on July of 2025.

The list tracks the number of businesses that NYC Business Acceleration has assisted in opening and how many jobs were created by those businesses. This data is up to date as of the date reflected in the "About" tab of this dataset.

This dataset provides an in-depth view of any specific company’s truck-based supply chain and its relationships with other facilities and companies within the continental US. We map US facilities (including factories, warehouses, and retail outlets) to companies. With this dataset, it is possible to track the movement of trucks and devices between locations to identify supply chain connections. Machine learning algorithms ingest 7-15bn daily events to estimate the volume of goods transported between locations. Consequently, we can map supply chain connections between: •Different companies (expressed as a percentage of volume transported). •Locations owned by the same company (e.g. warehouse to shop). With this novel geolocation approach, it is possible to "draw" a knowledge graph of any private or public company´s relations with other companies within the country. This solution, in the form of a dataset, provides an in-depth view into any specific company’s truck-based supply chain and its relationships with other facilities and companies within the continental United States. Use cases: - Identification and understanding of relations company-to-company: It helps to identify and infer relationships and connections between specific companies or facilities and between sectors/industries. - Identification and understanding of relations place-to-place: A logistics and domestic distribution supply chain can be mapped, both nationwide and state-wide in the US, and across countries in Europe. - Visualization and mapping of an entire supply chain network. - Tracking of products in any distribution or supply chain. - Risk assessment - Correlation analysis. - Disruption analysis. - Analysis of illicit networks and tracking of illegal use of corporate assets. - Improvement of casualty risk management. - Optimization of supply chain risk management. - Security and compliance. - Identification of not only the first tier of suppliers in the value chain, but also 2nd and 3rd tier suppliers, and more. Current largest use case: global corporation using it to model risk at a facility level (+100,000 locations).

Graph and download economic data for Corporate Profits After Tax (without IVA and CCAdj) (CP) from Q1 1947 to Q1 2025 about CCADJ, IVA, corporate profits, tax, corporate, GDP, and USA.

Financial data service providers offer financial market data and related services, primarily real-time feeds, portfolio analytics, research, pricing and valuation data, to financial institutions, traders and investors. Companies aggregate data and content from stock exchange feeds, broker and dealer desks and regulatory filings to distribute financial news and business information to the investment community. Recent globalization of the world capital market has benefited the financial sector and increased trading speed. Businesses rely on real-time data more than ever to help them make informed decisions. When considering a data service provider, an easy-to-use interface that shows customized, relevant information is vital for clients. During times of economic uncertainty, this information becomes more crucial than ever. Clients want information as soon and as frequently as possible, causing providers to prioritize efficiency and delivery. This was evident during the pandemic, the high interest rate environment in the latter part of the period and as the Fed cuts rates in 2024. Increased automation has helped industry players process large volumes of financial data, reducing analysis and reporting times. In addition, automation has reduced operational costs and reduced human data errors. These trends have resulted in growing revenue, which has risen at a CAGR of 3.2% to $21.9 billion over the past five years, including a 3.5% uptick in 2024 alone. Corporate profit will continue to expand as inflationary concerns begin to wane slowly. This will lead many companies to take on new clients as financial data helps them gain insight into operating their business amid ongoing trends and economic shakeups. With technology constantly advancing, service providers will continue investing in research and development to improve their products and services and best serve their clients. As technological advances continue, smaller players will be able to better compete with larger industry players. While this may lead to new companies joining the industry, larger providers will resume consolidation activity to expand their customer base. Overall, revenue is expected to swell at a CAGR of 2.7% to $25.0 billion by the end of 2029.

The Corporate Financial Fraud project is a study of company and top-executive characteristics of firms that ultimately violated Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) financial accounting and securities fraud provisions compared to a sample of public companies that did not. The fraud firm sample was identified through systematic review of SEC accounting enforcement releases from 2005-2010, which included administrative and civil actions, and referrals for criminal prosecution that were identified through mentions in enforcement release, indictments, and news searches. The non-fraud firms were randomly selected from among nearly 10,000 US public companies censused and active during at least one year between 2005-2010 in Standard and Poor's Compustat data. The Company and Top-Executive (CEO) databases combine information from numerous publicly available sources, many in raw form that were hand-coded (e.g., for fraud firms: Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases (AAER) enforcement releases, investigation summaries, SEC-filed complaints, litigation proceedings and case outcomes). Financial and structural information on companies for the year leading up to the financial fraud (or around year 2000 for non-fraud firms) was collected from Compustat financial statement data on Form 10-Ks, and supplemented by hand-collected data from original company 10-Ks, proxy statements, or other financial reports accessed via Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR), SEC's data-gathering search tool. For CEOs, data on personal background characteristics were collected from Execucomp and BoardEx databases, supplemented by hand-collection from proxy-statement biographies.

We examine the current state of the US public corporation and how it has evolved over the last 40 years. After falling by 50 percent since its peak in 1997, the number of public corporations is now smaller than 40 years ago. These corporations are now much larger and over the last twenty years have become much older; they invest differently, as the average firm invests more in R&D than it spends on capital expenditures; and compared to the 1990s, the ratio of investment to assets is lower, especially for large firms. Public firms have record high cash holdings and, in most recent years, the average firm has more cash than long-term debt. Measuring profitability by the ratio of earnings to assets, the average firm is less profitable, but that is driven by smaller firms. Earnings of public firms have become more concentrated—the top 200 firms in profits earn as much as all public firms combined. Firms' total payouts to shareholders as a percent of earnings are at record levels. Possible explanations for the current state of the public corporation include a decrease in the net benefits of being a public company, changes in financial intermediation, technological change, globalization, and consolidation through mergers.

United States New Security Issues: US Corporations: Stocks: Nonfinancial data was reported at 6.809 USD bn in May 2018. This records an increase from the previous number of 6.238 USD bn for Apr 2018. United States New Security Issues: US Corporations: Stocks: Nonfinancial data is updated monthly, averaging 5.349 USD bn from Feb 2003 (Median) to May 2018, with 184 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 23.709 USD bn in Feb 2015 and a record low of 641.000 USD mn in Dec 2008. United States New Security Issues: US Corporations: Stocks: Nonfinancial data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by Federal Reserve Board. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.Z030: New Security Issues: Corporations.

As of May 2024, over half of adults in the United States reported having no interest in dealing with companies that have experienced data breaches in the past. In contrast, only nine percent of adult users in the U.S. said they are very likely to trust a company that has had a data leak.

Every single contact from our firmographic database with 341 million+ companies comes directly from local sources that you can trust and are GDPR proof. We can deliver 200 firmographics such as company size, industry, legal status, revenue, employee size, opening hours, geocodes, import / export. BoldData is the nr.1 supplier of firmographic data supplier because we make use of thousands of local data sources. Ask us for a quote!

Key Table Information.Table Title.Annual Business Survey: Statistics for Employer Firms by Race for the U.S.: 2022.Table ID.ABSCS2022.AB00MYCSA01C.Survey/Program.Economic Surveys.Year.2022.Dataset.ECNSVY Annual Business Survey Company Summary.Release Date.2024-12-19.Release Schedule.The Annual Business Survey (ABS) occurs every year, beginning in reference year 2017.For more information about ABS planned data product releases, see Tentative ABS Schedule..Dataset Universe.The dataset universe consists of employer firms that are in operation for at least some part of the reference year, are located in one of the 50 U.S. states, associated offshore areas, or the District of Columbia, have paid employees and annual receipts of $1,000 or more, and are classified in one of nineteen in-scope sectors defined by the 2022 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS), except for NAICS 111, 112, 482, 491, 521, 525, 813, 814, and 92 which are not covered..Sponsor.National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics, U.S. National Science Foundation.Methodology.Data Items and Other Identifying Records.Number of employer firms (firms with paid employees)Sales and receipts of employer firms (reported in $1,000s of dollars)Number of employees (during the March 12 pay period)Annual payroll (reported in $1,000s of dollars)These data are aggregated by the following demographic classifications of firm for:All firms Classifiable (firms classifiable by sex, ethnicity, race, and veteran status) Race White Black or African American American Indian and Alaska Native Asian Asian Indian Chinese Filipino Japanese Korean Vietnamese Other Asian Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian Guamanian or Chamorro Samoan Other Pacific Islander Minority (Firms classified as any race and ethnicity combination other than non-Hispanic and White) Equally minority/nonminority Nonminority (Firms classified as non-Hispanic and White) Unclassifiable (firms not classifiable by sex, ethnicity, race, and veteran status) Definitions can be found by clicking on the column header in the table or by accessing the Economic Census Glossary..Unit(s) of Observation.The reporting units for the ABS are employer companies or firms rather than establishments. A company or firm is comprised of one or more in-scope establishments that operate under the ownership or control of a single organization..Geography Coverage.The data are shown for the U.S. only.For information about geographies, see Geographies..Industry Coverage.The data are shown for the total of all sectors ("00") NAICS code. Sector "00" is not an official NAICS sector but is rather a way to indicate a total for multiple sectors. Note: Other programs outside of ABS may use sector 00 to indicate when multiple NAICS sectors are being displayed within the same table and/or dataset.The following are excluded from the total of all sectors:Crop and Animal Production (NAICS 111 and 112)Rail Transportation (NAICS 482)Postal Service (NAICS 491)Monetary Authorities-Central Bank (NAICS 521)Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles (NAICS 525)Office of Notaries (NAICS 541120)Religious, Grantmaking, Civic, Professional, and Similar Organizations (NAICS 813)Private Households (NAICS 814)Public Administration (NAICS 92)For information about NAICS, see North American Industry Classification System..Sampling.The ABS sample includes firms that are selected with certainty if they have known research and development activities, were included in the 2022 BERD sample, or have high receipts, payroll, or employment. Total sample size is 850,000 firms. The universe is stratified by state, industry group, and expected demographic group. Firms selected to the sample receive a questionnaire. For all data on this table, firms not selected into the sample are represented with administrative, 2022 Economic Census, or other economic surveys records.For more information about the sample design, see Annual Business Survey Methodology..Confidentiality.The Census Bureau has reviewed this data product to ensure appropriate access, use, and disclosure avoidance protection of the confidential source data (Project No. P-7504866, Disclosure Review Board (DRB) approval number: CBDRB-FY24-0351).To protect confidentiality, the U.S. Census Bureau suppresses cell values to minimize the risk of identifying a particular business' data or identity.To comply with data quality standards, data rows with high relative standard errors (RSE) are not presented. Additionally, firm counts are suppressed when other select statistics in the same row are suppressed. More information on disclosure avoidance is available in the Annual Business Survey Methodology..Technical Documentation/Methodology.For detailed information about the methods used to collect data and produce statistics, survey questionnaires, Primary Business Activity/NAICS codes, and more, see Technical Documentation..Weights.For more information about weighting, see An...