100+ datasets found
  1. N

    counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Multi-Racial White Population // 2025...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Multi-Racial White Population // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/lists/counties-in-massachusetts-by-multi-racial-white-population/
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Massachusetts
    Variables measured
    Multi-Racial White Population, Multi-Racial White Population as Percent of Total Population of counties in Massachusetts, Multi-Racial White Population as Percent of Total Multi-Racial White Population of Massachusetts
    Measurement technique
    To measure the rank and respective trends, we initially gathered data from the five most recent American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. We then analyzed and categorized the data for each of the racial categories identified by the U.S. Census Bureau. Based on the required racial category classification, we calculated the rank. For geographies with no population reported for the chosen race, we did not assign a rank and excluded them from the list. It is possible that a small population exists but was not reported or captured due to limitations or variations in Census data collection and reporting. We ensured that the population estimates used in this dataset pertain exclusively to the identified racial categories and do not rely on any ethnicity classification, unless explicitly required.For further information regarding these estimates, please feel free to reach out to us via email at research@neilsberg.com.
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    This list ranks the 14 counties in the Massachusetts by Multi-Racial White population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

    • 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Rank by Multi-Racial White Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Massachusetts by their Multi-Racial White population, using the most recent ACS data available.
    • counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
    • Multi-Racial White Population: The Multi-Racial White population of the counties is shown in this column.
    • % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Multi-Racial White. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
    • % of Total Massachusetts Multi-Racial White Population: This tells us how much of the entire Massachusetts Multi-Racial White population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
    • 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

  2. 2020 Cartographic Boundary File (KML), Current County Subdivision for...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Dec 14, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Customer Engagement Branch (Point of Contact) (2023). 2020 Cartographic Boundary File (KML), Current County Subdivision for Massachusetts, 1:500,000 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/2020-cartographic-boundary-file-kml-current-county-subdivision-for-massachusetts-1-500000
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 14, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Massachusetts
    Description

    The 2020 cartographic boundary KMLs are simplified representations of selected geographic areas from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). These boundary files are specifically designed for small-scale thematic mapping. When possible, generalization is performed with the intent to maintain the hierarchical relationships among geographies and to maintain the alignment of geographies within a file set for a given year. Geographic areas may not align with the same areas from another year. Some geographies are available as nation-based files while others are available only as state-based files. County subdivisions are the primary divisions of counties and their equivalent entities for the reporting of Census Bureau data. They include legally-recognized minor civil divisions (MCDs) and statistical census county divisions (CCDs), and unorganized territories. In MCD states where no MCD exists or no MCD is defined, the Census Bureau creates statistical unorganized territories to complete coverage. The entire area of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas are covered by county subdivisions. The generalized boundaries of legal MCDs are based on those as of January 1, 2020 as reported through the Census Bureau's Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). The generalized boundaries of all CCDs, delineated in 21 states, are those as reported as part of the Census Bureau's Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP) for the 2020 Census.

  3. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, County, Hampshire County, MA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 27, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, County, Hampshire County, MA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2022-county-hampshire-county-ma-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocod
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Hampshire County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  4. United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County

    • data.cdc.gov
    • healthdata.gov
    • +1more
    csv, xlsx, xml
    Updated Nov 2, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    CDC COVID-19 Response (2023). United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County [Dataset]. https://data.cdc.gov/Public-Health-Surveillance/United-States-COVID-19-Community-Levels-by-County/3nnm-4jni
    Explore at:
    csv, xlsx, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Nov 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    Centers for Disease Control and Preventionhttp://www.cdc.gov/
    Authors
    CDC COVID-19 Response
    License

    https://www.usa.gov/government-workshttps://www.usa.gov/government-works

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Reporting of Aggregate Case and Death Count data was discontinued May 11, 2023, with the expiration of the COVID-19 public health emergency declaration. Although these data will continue to be publicly available, this dataset will no longer be updated.

    This archived public use dataset has 11 data elements reflecting United States COVID-19 community levels for all available counties.

    The COVID-19 community levels were developed using a combination of three metrics — new COVID-19 admissions per 100,000 population in the past 7 days, the percent of staffed inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients, and total new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 population in the past 7 days. The COVID-19 community level was determined by the higher of the new admissions and inpatient beds metrics, based on the current level of new cases per 100,000 population in the past 7 days. New COVID-19 admissions and the percent of staffed inpatient beds occupied represent the current potential for strain on the health system. Data on new cases acts as an early warning indicator of potential increases in health system strain in the event of a COVID-19 surge.

    Using these data, the COVID-19 community level was classified as low, medium, or high.

    COVID-19 Community Levels were used to help communities and individuals make decisions based on their local context and their unique needs. Community vaccination coverage and other local information, like early alerts from surveillance, such as through wastewater or the number of emergency department visits for COVID-19, when available, can also inform decision making for health officials and individuals.

    For the most accurate and up-to-date data for any county or state, visit the relevant health department website. COVID Data Tracker may display data that differ from state and local websites. This can be due to differences in how data were collected, how metrics were calculated, or the timing of web updates.

    Archived Data Notes:

    This dataset was renamed from "United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County as Originally Posted" to "United States COVID-19 Community Levels by County" on March 31, 2022.

    March 31, 2022: Column name for county population was changed to “county_population”. No change was made to the data points previous released.

    March 31, 2022: New column, “health_service_area_population”, was added to the dataset to denote the total population in the designated Health Service Area based on 2019 Census estimate.

    March 31, 2022: FIPS codes for territories American Samoa, Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and United States Virgin Islands were re-formatted to 5-digit numeric for records released on 3/3/2022 to be consistent with other records in the dataset.

    March 31, 2022: Changes were made to the text fields in variables “county”, “state”, and “health_service_area” so the formats are consistent across releases.

    March 31, 2022: The “%” sign was removed from the text field in column “covid_inpatient_bed_utilization”. No change was made to the data. As indicated in the column description, values in this column represent the percentage of staffed inpatient beds occupied by COVID-19 patients (7-day average).

    March 31, 2022: Data values for columns, “county_population”, “health_service_area_number”, and “health_service_area” were backfilled for records released on 2/24/2022. These columns were added since the week of 3/3/2022, thus the values were previously missing for records released the week prior.

    April 7, 2022: Updates made to data released on 3/24/2022 for Guam, Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and United States Virgin Islands to correct a data mapping error.

    April 21, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for counties in Nebraska for the week of April 21, 2022 have 3 counties identified in the high category and 37 in the medium category. CDC has been working with state officials to verify the data submitted, as other data systems are not providing alerts for substantial increases in disease transmission or severity in the state.

    May 26, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for McCracken County, KY for the week of May 5, 2022 have been updated to correct a data processing error. McCracken County, KY should have appeared in the low community level category during the week of May 5, 2022. This correction is reflected in this update.

    May 26, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for several Florida counties for the week of May 19th, 2022, have been corrected for a data processing error. Of note, Broward, Miami-Dade, Palm Beach Counties should have appeared in the high CCL category, and Osceola County should have appeared in the medium CCL category. These corrections are reflected in this update.

    May 26, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Orange County, New York for the week of May 26, 2022 displayed an erroneous case rate of zero and a CCL category of low due to a data source error. This county should have appeared in the medium CCL category.

    June 2, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Tolland County, CT for the week of May 26, 2022 have been updated to correct a data processing error. Tolland County, CT should have appeared in the medium community level category during the week of May 26, 2022. This correction is reflected in this update.

    June 9, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Tolland County, CT for the week of May 26, 2022 have been updated to correct a misspelling. The medium community level category for Tolland County, CT on the week of May 26, 2022 was misspelled as “meduim” in the data set. This correction is reflected in this update.

    June 9, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Mississippi counties for the week of June 9, 2022 should be interpreted with caution due to a reporting cadence change over the Memorial Day holiday that resulted in artificially inflated case rates in the state.

    July 7, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Rock County, Minnesota for the week of July 7, 2022 displayed an artificially low case rate and CCL category due to a data source error. This county should have appeared in the high CCL category.

    July 14, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Massachusetts counties for the week of July 14, 2022 should be interpreted with caution due to a reporting cadence change that resulted in lower than expected case rates and CCL categories in the state.

    July 28, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for all Montana counties for the week of July 21, 2022 had case rates of 0 due to a reporting issue. The case rates have been corrected in this update.

    July 28, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released for Alaska for all weeks prior to July 21, 2022 included non-resident cases. The case rates for the time series have been corrected in this update.

    July 28, 2022: A laboratory in Nevada reported a backlog of historic COVID-19 cases. As a result, the 7-day case count and rate will be inflated in Clark County, NV for the week of July 28, 2022.

    August 4, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data was updated on August 2, 2022 in error during performance testing. Data for the week of July 28, 2022 was changed during this update due to additional case and hospital data as a result of late reporting between July 28, 2022 and August 2, 2022. Since the purpose of this data set is to provide point-in-time views of COVID-19 Community Levels on Thursdays, any changes made to the data set during the August 2, 2022 update have been reverted in this update.

    August 4, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data for the week of July 28, 2022 for 8 counties in Utah (Beaver County, Daggett County, Duchesne County, Garfield County, Iron County, Kane County, Uintah County, and Washington County) case data was missing due to data collection issues. CDC and its partners have resolved the issue and the correction is reflected in this update.

    August 4, 2022: Due to a reporting cadence change, case rates for all Alabama counties will be lower than expected. As a result, the CCL levels published on August 4, 2022 should be interpreted with caution.

    August 11, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data for the week of August 4, 2022 for South Carolina have been updated to correct a data collection error that resulted in incorrect case data. CDC and its partners have resolved the issue and the correction is reflected in this update.

    August 18, 2022: COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data for the week of August 11, 2022 for Connecticut have been updated to correct a data ingestion error that inflated the CT case rates. CDC, in collaboration with CT, has resolved the issue and the correction is reflected in this update.

    August 25, 2022: A laboratory in Tennessee reported a backlog of historic COVID-19 cases. As a result, the 7-day case count and rate may be inflated in many counties and the CCLs published on August 25, 2022 should be interpreted with caution.

    August 25, 2022: Due to a data source error, the 7-day case rate for St. Louis County, Missouri, is reported as zero in the COVID-19 Community Level data released on August 25, 2022. Therefore, the COVID-19 Community Level for this county should be interpreted with caution.

    September 1, 2022: Due to a reporting issue, case rates for all Nebraska counties will include 6 days of data instead of 7 days in the COVID-19 Community Level (CCL) data released on September 1, 2022. Therefore, the CCLs for all Nebraska counties should be interpreted with caution.

    September 8, 2022: Due to a data processing error, the case rate for Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania,

  5. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Essex County, MA, Address Ranges...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Dec 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2023). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Essex County, MA, Address Ranges Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-essex-county-ma-address-ranges-relationship-file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Area covered
    Essex County
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Ranges Relationship File (ADDR.dbf) contains the attributes of each address range. Each address range applies to a single edge and has a unique address range identifier (ARID) value. The edge to which an address range applies can be determined by linking the address range to the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp) using the permanent topological edge identifier (TLID) attribute. Multiple address ranges can apply to the same edge since an edge can have multiple address ranges. Note that the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge already appears in the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp). The TIGER/Line Files contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line Files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist.

  6. N

    counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Hispanic Native American Population //...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Hispanic Native American Population // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/lists/counties-in-massachusetts-by-hispanic-native-american-population/
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Massachusetts
    Variables measured
    Hispanic Native American Population, Hispanic Native American Population as Percent of Total Population of counties in Massachusetts, Hispanic Native American Population as Percent of Total Hispanic Native American Population of Massachusetts
    Measurement technique
    To measure the rank and respective trends, we initially gathered data from the five most recent American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. We then analyzed and categorized the data for each of the racial categories identified by the U.S. Census Bureau. Based on the required racial category classification, we calculated the rank. For geographies with no population reported for the chosen race, we did not assign a rank and excluded them from the list. It is possible that a small population exists but was not reported or captured due to limitations or variations in Census data collection and reporting. We ensured that the population estimates used in this dataset pertain exclusively to the identified racial categories and do not rely on any ethnicity classification, unless explicitly required.For further information regarding these estimates, please feel free to reach out to us via email at research@neilsberg.com.
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    This list ranks the 14 counties in the Massachusetts by Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

    • 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Rank by Hispanic Native American Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Massachusetts by their Hispanic American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) population, using the most recent ACS data available.
    • counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
    • Hispanic Native American Population: The Hispanic Native American population of the counties is shown in this column.
    • % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Hispanic Native American. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
    • % of Total Massachusetts Hispanic Native American Population: This tells us how much of the entire Massachusetts Hispanic Native American population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
    • 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

  7. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, County, Suffolk County, MA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz
    • +1more
    Updated Jan 27, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, County, Suffolk County, MA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2022-county-suffolk-county-ma-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocodes
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Suffolk County
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  8. d

    TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, county, Suffolk County, MA, Address...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Dec 3, 2020
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2020). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2019, county, Suffolk County, MA, Address Range-Feature Name County-based Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2019-county-suffolk-county-ma-address-range-feature-name-county-based-rela
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 3, 2020
    Area covered
    Suffolk County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Range / Feature Name Relationship File (ADDRFN.dbf) contains a record for each address range / linear feature name relationship. The purpose of this relationship file is to identify all street names associated with each address range. An edge can have several feature names; an address range located on an edge can be associated with one or any combination of the available feature names (an address range can be linked to multiple feature names). The address range is identified by the address range identifier (ARID) attribute that can be used to link to the Address Ranges Relationship File (ADDR.dbf). The linear feature name is identified by the linear feature identifier (LINEARID) attribute that can be used to link to the Feature Names Relationship File (FEATNAMES.dbf).

  9. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Essex County, MA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz
    Updated Aug 11, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Essex County, MA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-essex-county-ma-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocodes
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 11, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Essex County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  10. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Middlesex County, MA, Address...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Dec 15, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2023). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Middlesex County, MA, Address Range-Feature [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-middlesex-county-ma-address-range-feature
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Area covered
    Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Ranges Feature Shapefile (ADDRFEAT.dbf) contains the geospatial edge geometry and attributes of all unsuppressed address ranges for a county or county equivalent area. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. Single-address address ranges have been suppressed to maintain the confidentiality of the addresses they describe. Multiple coincident address range feature edge records are represented in the shapefile if more than one left or right address ranges are associated to the edge. The ADDRFEAT shapefile contains a record for each address range to street name combination. Address range associated to more than one street name are also represented by multiple coincident address range feature edge records. Note that the ADDRFEAT shapefile includes all unsuppressed address ranges compared to the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp) which only includes the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge. The TIGER/Line shapefile contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line Files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist.

  11. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, State, Massachusetts, MA, Census Tract

    • catalog.data.gov
    • res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz
    Updated Jan 27, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Spatial Data Collection and Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2024). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2022, State, Massachusetts, MA, Census Tract [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2022-state-massachusetts-ma-census-tract
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jan 27, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Census tracts are small, relatively permanent statistical subdivisions of a county or equivalent entity, and were defined by local participants as part of the 2020 Census Participant Statistical Areas Program. The Census Bureau delineated the census tracts in situations where no local participant existed or where all the potential participants declined to participate. The primary purpose of census tracts is to provide a stable set of geographic units for the presentation of census data and comparison back to previous decennial censuses. Census tracts generally have a population size between 1,200 and 8,000 people, with an optimum size of 4,000 people. When first delineated, census tracts were designed to be homogeneous with respect to population characteristics, economic status, and living conditions. The spatial size of census tracts varies widely depending on the density of settlement. Physical changes in street patterns caused by highway construction, new development, and so forth, may require boundary revisions. In addition, census tracts occasionally are split due to population growth, or combined as a result of substantial population decline. Census tract boundaries generally follow visible and identifiable features. They may follow legal boundaries such as minor civil division (MCD) or incorporated place boundaries in some States and situations to allow for census tract-to-governmental unit relationships where the governmental boundaries tend to remain unchanged between censuses. State and county boundaries always are census tract boundaries in the standard census geographic hierarchy. In a few rare instances, a census tract may consist of noncontiguous areas. These noncontiguous areas may occur where the census tracts are coextensive with all or parts of legal entities that are themselves noncontiguous. For the 2010 Census, the census tract code range of 9400 through 9499 was enforced for census tracts that include a majority American Indian population according to Census 2000 data and/or their area was primarily covered by federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands; the code range 9800 through 9899 was enforced for those census tracts that contained little or no population and represented a relatively large special land use area such as a National Park, military installation, or a business/industrial park; and the code range 9900 through 9998 was enforced for those census tracts that contained only water area, no land area.

  12. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Worcester County, MA, Address...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Aug 10, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Worcester County, MA, Address Range-Feature [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-worcester-county-ma-address-range-feature
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 10, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Worcester County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Ranges Feature Shapefile (ADDRFEAT.dbf) contains the geospatial edge geometry and attributes of all unsuppressed address ranges for a county or county equivalent area. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. Single-address address ranges have been suppressed to maintain the confidentiality of the addresses they describe. Multiple coincident address range feature edge records are represented in the shapefile if more than one left or right address ranges are associated to the edge. The ADDRFEAT shapefile contains a record for each address range to street name combination. Address range associated to more than one street name are also represented by multiple coincident address range feature edge records. Note that the ADDRFEAT shapefile includes all unsuppressed address ranges compared to the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp) which only includes the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge. The TIGER/Line shapefile contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line Files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist.

  13. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Barnstable County, MA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • res1catalogd-o-tdatad-o-tgov.vcapture.xyz
    Updated Aug 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Barnstable County, MA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-barnstable-county-ma-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geoco
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Barnstable County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  14. TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Suffolk County, MA, Address...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Aug 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Suffolk County, MA, Address Range-Feature Name Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-current-county-suffolk-county-ma-address-range-feature-name-relationship-f
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Suffolk County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) System (MTS). The MTS represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Range/Feature Name Relationship File contains a record for each address range/linear feature name relationship. The purpose of this relationship file is to identify all street names associated with each address range. An edge can have several feature names; an address range located on an edge can be associated with one or any combination of the available feature names (an address range can be linked to multiple feature names). The address range is identified by the address range identifier (ARID) attribute that can be used to link to the Address Range Relationship File (addr.dbf). The linear feature name is identified by the linear feature identifier (LINEARID) attribute which can be used to link to the Feature Names Relationship File (featnames.dbf).

  15. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Bristol County, MA, Topological Faces...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • s.cnmilf.com
    Updated Dec 15, 2023
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2023). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Bristol County, MA, Topological Faces (Polygons With All Geocodes) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-bristol-county-ma-topological-faces-polygons-with-all-geocodes
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 15, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    Area covered
    Bristol County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. Face refers to the areal (polygon) topological primitives that make up MTDB. A face is bounded by one or more edges; its boundary includes only the edges that separate it from other faces, not any interior edges contained within the area of the face. The Topological Faces Shapefile contains the attributes of each topological primitive face. Each face has a unique topological face identifier (TFID) value. Each face in the shapefile includes the key geographic area codes for all geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data for both the 2020 Census and the annual estimates and surveys. The geometries of each of these geographic areas can then be built by dissolving the face geometries on the appropriate key geographic area codes in the Topological Faces Shapefile.

  16. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Hampden County, MA, Address Ranges...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Aug 10, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Hampden County, MA, Address Ranges Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-hampden-county-ma-address-ranges-relationship-file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 10, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Hampden County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Ranges Relationship File (ADDR.dbf) contains the attributes of each address range. Each address range applies to a single edge and has a unique address range identifier (ARID) value. The edge to which an address range applies can be determined by linking the address range to the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp) using the permanent topological edge identifier (TLID) attribute. Multiple address ranges can apply to the same edge since an edge can have multiple address ranges. Note that the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge already appears in the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp). The TIGER/Line Files contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line Files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist.

  17. TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Middlesex County, MA, Address Ranges...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Aug 9, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Middlesex County, MA, Address Ranges Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-current-county-middlesex-county-ma-address-ranges-relationship-file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 9, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) System (MTS). The MTS represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Range Relationship File contains the attributes of each address range. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist. Each address range applies to a single edge and has a unique address range identifier (ARID) value. The edge to which an address range applies can be determined by linking the address range to the All Lines shapefile (edges.shp) using the permanent topological edge identifier (TLID) attribute. Multiple address ranges can apply to the same edge since an edge can have multiple address ranges. Note that the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge already appears in the All Lines Shapefile (edges.shp). The TIGER/Line files contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses.

  18. TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Middlesex County, MA, Feature Names...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Aug 8, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, Current, County, Middlesex County, MA, Feature Names Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-current-county-middlesex-county-ma-feature-names-relationship-file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) System (MTS). The MTS represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Feature Names Relationship File contains a record for each feature name and any attributes associated with it. Each feature name can be linked to the corresponding edges that make up that feature in the All Lines shapefile (edges.shp), where applicable to the corresponding address range or ranges in the Address Range Relationship File (addr.dbf), or to both files. Although this file includes feature names for all linear features, not just road features, the primary purpose of this relationship file is to identify all street names associated with each address range. An edge can have several feature names; an address range located on an edge can be associated with one or any combination of the available feature names (an address range can be linked to multiple feature names). The address range is identified by the address range identifier (ARID) attribute, which can be used to link to the Address Range Relationship File (addr.dbf). The linear feature is identified by the linear feature identifier (LINEARID) attribute, which can be used to relate the address range back to the name attributes of the feature in the Feature Names Relationship File or to the feature record in the Primary Roads, Primary and Secondary Roads, or All Roads shapefiles. The edge to which a feature name applies can be determined by linking the feature name record to the All Lines shapefile (edges.shp) using the permanent edge identifier (TLID) attribute. The address range identifier(s) (ARID) for a specific linear feature can be found by using the linear feature identifier (LINEARID) from the Feature Names Relationship File through the Address Range/Feature Name Relationship File (addrfn.dbf).

  19. N

    counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Hispanic Asian Population // 2025...

    • neilsberg.com
    csv, json
    Updated Feb 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Neilsberg Research (2025). counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Hispanic Asian Population // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/lists/counties-in-massachusetts-by-hispanic-asian-population/
    Explore at:
    csv, jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2025
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Neilsberg Research
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    Massachusetts
    Variables measured
    Hispanic Asian Population, Hispanic Asian Population as Percent of Total Population of counties in Massachusetts, Hispanic Asian Population as Percent of Total Hispanic Asian Population of Massachusetts
    Measurement technique
    To measure the rank and respective trends, we initially gathered data from the five most recent American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. We then analyzed and categorized the data for each of the racial categories identified by the U.S. Census Bureau. Based on the required racial category classification, we calculated the rank. For geographies with no population reported for the chosen race, we did not assign a rank and excluded them from the list. It is possible that a small population exists but was not reported or captured due to limitations or variations in Census data collection and reporting. We ensured that the population estimates used in this dataset pertain exclusively to the identified racial categories and do not rely on any ethnicity classification, unless explicitly required.For further information regarding these estimates, please feel free to reach out to us via email at research@neilsberg.com.
    Dataset funded by
    Neilsberg Research
    Description
    About this dataset

    Context

    This list ranks the 14 counties in the Massachusetts by Hispanic Asian population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

    Content

    When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

    • 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
    • 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

    Variables / Data Columns

    • Rank by Hispanic Asian Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Massachusetts by their Hispanic Asian population, using the most recent ACS data available.
    • counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
    • Hispanic Asian Population: The Hispanic Asian population of the counties is shown in this column.
    • % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Hispanic Asian. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
    • % of Total Massachusetts Hispanic Asian Population: This tells us how much of the entire Massachusetts Hispanic Asian population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
    • 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

    Good to know

    Margin of Error

    Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

    Custom data

    If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

    Inspiration

    Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

  20. TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Norfolk County, MA, Address Ranges...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • datasets.ai
    • +1more
    Updated Aug 10, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau, Geography Division, Geospatial Products Branch (Point of Contact) (2025). TIGER/Line Shapefile, 2023, County, Norfolk County, MA, Address Ranges Relationship File [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/tiger-line-shapefile-2023-county-norfolk-county-ma-address-ranges-relationship-file
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Aug 10, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    United States Census Bureauhttp://census.gov/
    United States Department of Commercehttp://commerce.gov/
    Area covered
    Norfolk County, Massachusetts
    Description

    The TIGER/Line shapefiles and related database files (.dbf) are an extract of selected geographic and cartographic information from the U.S. Census Bureau's Master Address File / Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing (MAF/TIGER) Database (MTDB). The MTDB represents a seamless national file with no overlaps or gaps between parts, however, each TIGER/Line shapefile is designed to stand alone as an independent data set, or they can be combined to cover the entire nation. The Address Ranges Relationship File (ADDR.dbf) contains the attributes of each address range. Each address range applies to a single edge and has a unique address range identifier (ARID) value. The edge to which an address range applies can be determined by linking the address range to the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp) using the permanent topological edge identifier (TLID) attribute. Multiple address ranges can apply to the same edge since an edge can have multiple address ranges. Note that the most inclusive address range associated with each side of a street edge already appears in the All Lines Shapefile (EDGES.shp). The TIGER/Line Files contain potential address ranges, not individual addresses. The term "address range" refers to the collection of all possible structure numbers from the first structure number to the last structure number and all numbers of a specified parity in between along an edge side relative to the direction in which the edge is coded. The address ranges in the TIGER/Line Files are potential ranges that include the full range of possible structure numbers even though the actual structures may not exist.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Neilsberg Research (2025). counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Multi-Racial White Population // 2025 Edition [Dataset]. https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/lists/counties-in-massachusetts-by-multi-racial-white-population/

counties in Massachusetts Ranked by Multi-Racial White Population // 2025 Edition

Explore at:
csv, jsonAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Feb 13, 2025
Dataset authored and provided by
Neilsberg Research
License

Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
License information was derived automatically

Area covered
Massachusetts
Variables measured
Multi-Racial White Population, Multi-Racial White Population as Percent of Total Population of counties in Massachusetts, Multi-Racial White Population as Percent of Total Multi-Racial White Population of Massachusetts
Measurement technique
To measure the rank and respective trends, we initially gathered data from the five most recent American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates. We then analyzed and categorized the data for each of the racial categories identified by the U.S. Census Bureau. Based on the required racial category classification, we calculated the rank. For geographies with no population reported for the chosen race, we did not assign a rank and excluded them from the list. It is possible that a small population exists but was not reported or captured due to limitations or variations in Census data collection and reporting. We ensured that the population estimates used in this dataset pertain exclusively to the identified racial categories and do not rely on any ethnicity classification, unless explicitly required.For further information regarding these estimates, please feel free to reach out to us via email at research@neilsberg.com.
Dataset funded by
Neilsberg Research
Description
About this dataset

Context

This list ranks the 14 counties in the Massachusetts by Multi-Racial White population, as estimated by the United States Census Bureau. It also highlights population changes in each counties over the past five years.

Content

When available, the data consists of estimates from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates, including:

  • 2019-2023 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
  • 2018-2022 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
  • 2017-2021 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
  • 2016-2020 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
  • 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates

Variables / Data Columns

  • Rank by Multi-Racial White Population: This column displays the rank of counties in the Massachusetts by their Multi-Racial White population, using the most recent ACS data available.
  • counties: The counties for which the rank is shown in the previous column.
  • Multi-Racial White Population: The Multi-Racial White population of the counties is shown in this column.
  • % of Total counties Population: This shows what percentage of the total counties population identifies as Multi-Racial White. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
  • % of Total Massachusetts Multi-Racial White Population: This tells us how much of the entire Massachusetts Multi-Racial White population lives in that counties. Please note that the sum of all percentages may not equal one due to rounding of values.
  • 5 Year Rank Trend: TThis column displays the rank trend across the last 5 years.

Good to know

Margin of Error

Data in the dataset are based on the estimates and are subject to sampling variability and thus a margin of error. Neilsberg Research recommends using caution when presening these estimates in your research.

Custom data

If you do need custom data for any of your research project, report or presentation, you can contact our research staff at research@neilsberg.com for a feasibility of a custom tabulation on a fee-for-service basis.

Inspiration

Neilsberg Research Team curates, analyze and publishes demographics and economic data from a variety of public and proprietary sources, each of which often includes multiple surveys and programs. The large majority of Neilsberg Research aggregated datasets and insights is made available for free download at https://www.neilsberg.com/research/.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu