This data set includes tables on persons living with HIV/AIDS, newly diagnosed HIV cases and all cause deaths in HIV/AIDS cases by gender, age, race/ethnicity and transmission category.

In all tables, cases are reported as of December 31 of the given year, as reported by January 9, 2019, to allow a minimum of 12 months reporting delay.

Gender is determined by both current gender and sex at birth variables; transgender values are assigned when current gender is identified as "Transgender" or when a discrepancy is identified between a person's sex at birth and their current gender (e.g., cases where sex at birth is "Male" and current gender is "Female" will become Transgender: Male to Female.) Prior to 2003, Asian and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders were classified as one combined group. In order to present these race/ethnicities separately, living cases recorded under this combined classification were split and redistributed according to their expected proportional population representation estimated from post-2003 data.

This dataset is about countries per year in Albania. It has 64 rows. It features 4 columns: country, incidence of HIV, and death rate.

Context

In the time of epidemics, what is the status of HIV AIDS across the world, where does each country stands, is it getting any better. The data set should be helpful to explore much more about above mentioned factors.

Content

The data set contains data on

1. No. of people living with HIV AIDS
2. No. of deaths due to HIV AIDS
3. No. of cases among adults (19-45)
4. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission estimates
5. ART (Anti Retro-viral Therapy) coverage among people living with HIV estimates
6. ART (Anti Retro-viral Therapy) coverage among children estimates

Acknowledgements / Data Source

• WHO : https://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/
• UNESCO : https://data.unicef.org/resources/dataset/hiv-aids-statistical-tables/

Collection methodology

https://github.com/imdevskp/hiv_aids_who_unesco_data_cleaning

Cover Photo

Photo by Anna Shvets from Pexels https://www.pexels.com/photo/red-ribbon-on-white-surface-3900425/

Similar Datasets

• COVID-19 - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/corona-virus-report
• MERS - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/mers-outbreak-dataset-20122019
• Ebola Western Africa 2014 Outbreak - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/ebola-outbreak-20142016-complete-dataset
• H1N1 | Swine Flu 2009 Pandemic Dataset - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/h1n1-swine-flu-2009-pandemic-dataset
• SARS 2003 Pandemic - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/sars-outbreak-2003-complete-dataset
• HIV AIDS - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/hiv-aids-dataset

Analysis of ‘HIV AIDS Dataset’ provided by Analyst-2 (analyst-2.ai), based on source dataset retrieved from https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/hiv-aids-dataset on 13 February 2022.

--- Dataset description provided by original source is as follows ---

Context

In the time of epidemics, what is the status of HIV AIDS across the world, where does each country stands, is it getting any better. The data set should be helpful to explore much more about above mentioned factors.

Content

The data set contains data on

1. No. of people living with HIV AIDS
2. No. of deaths due to HIV AIDS
3. No. of cases among adults (19-45)
4. Prevention of mother-to-child transmission estimates
5. ART (Anti Retro-viral Therapy) coverage among people living with HIV estimates
6. ART (Anti Retro-viral Therapy) coverage among children estimates

Acknowledgements / Data Source

• WHO : https://www.who.int/hiv/data/en/
• UNESCO : https://data.unicef.org/resources/dataset/hiv-aids-statistical-tables/

Collection methodology

https://github.com/imdevskp/hiv_aids_who_unesco_data_cleaning

Cover Photo

Photo by Anna Shvets from Pexels https://www.pexels.com/photo/red-ribbon-on-white-surface-3900425/

Similar Datasets

• COVID-19 - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/corona-virus-report
• MERS - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/mers-outbreak-dataset-20122019
• Ebola Western Africa 2014 Outbreak - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/ebola-outbreak-20142016-complete-dataset
• H1N1 | Swine Flu 2009 Pandemic Dataset - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/h1n1-swine-flu-2009-pandemic-dataset
• SARS 2003 Pandemic - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/sars-outbreak-2003-complete-dataset
• HIV AIDS - https://www.kaggle.com/imdevskp/hiv-aids-dataset

--- Original source retains full ownership of the source dataset ---

This dataset is about countries per year in Lebanon. It has 64 rows. It features 4 columns: country, incidence of HIV, and death rate.

This dataset provides detailed insights into the prevalence of HIV/AIDS among adults (ages 15–49) across various countries and regions. The data is primarily sourced from the CIA World Factbook and the UNAIDS AIDSinfo platform and reflects the most recent available estimates as of 2022–2024.

What’s Included:

Country/Region – The name of each nation or area.

Adult Prevalence of HIV/AIDS (%) – The percentage of adults estimated to be living with HIV.

Number of People with HIV/AIDS – Estimated count of people infected in each country.

Annual Deaths from HIV/AIDS – Estimated number of HIV/AIDS-related deaths per year.

Year of Estimate – The year the data was reported or estimated.

Key Highlights:

Global Prevalence: Around 0.7% of the global population was living with HIV in 2022, affecting nearly 39 million people.

Hotspots: The epidemic is most severe in Southern Africa, with countries like Eswatini, Botswana, Lesotho, and Zimbabwe reporting adult prevalence rates above 20%.

High Burden Countries:

South Africa: 17.3% prevalence, approximately 9.2 million infected

Tanzania: approximately 7.49 million

Mozambique: approximately 2.48 million

Nigeria: approximately 2.45 million (1.3% prevalence)

Notes:

Data may vary in accuracy and is subject to ongoing updates and verification.

Some entries include a dash ("-") where data was not published or available.

Countries with over 1% adult prevalence are categorized under Generalized HIV Epidemics (GHEs) by UNAIDS.

Context

The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene publishes mid-year and annual HIV surveillance reports each year. This dataset is taken from these reports and includes data gathered from 2011 to June 30, 2016.

Content

This dataset includes HIV infections and AIDS diagnoses, viral suppression in persons living with diagnosed HIV infection (PLWDHI), deaths of those with diagnosed HIV infection, and other statistics from 2011 to 2015 in New York City boroughs.

Purpose

The data contained here shows trends in age, gender, and geographic demographics over time for HIV infections in NYC, and this can be used to visualize the prevalence of the virus in the city.

Acknowledgement

This data was pulled from NYC's OpenData at https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/DOHMH-HIV-AIDS-Annual-Report/fju2-rdad .

Rate: Number of deaths (per 100,000) due to HIV disease

Definition: Deaths with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease as the underlying cause (ICD-10 codes: B20-B24).

Data Sources:

(1) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics

(2) Death Certificate Database, Office of Vital Statistics and Registry, New Jersey Department of Health

(3) Population Estimates, State Data Center, New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development

Data Series: Number of new HIV infections per 1,000 uninfected population, by sex and age Indicator: III.8 - Number of new HIV infections per 1,000 uninfected population, by sex, age and key populations Source year: 2023 This dataset is part of the Minimum Gender Dataset compiled by the United Nations Statistics Division. Domain: Health and related services

United States US: Prevalence of HIV: Total: % of Population Aged 15-49 data was reported at 0.500 % in 2014. This stayed constant from the previous number of 0.500 % for 2013. United States US: Prevalence of HIV: Total: % of Population Aged 15-49 data is updated yearly, averaging 0.500 % from Dec 2008 (Median) to 2014, with 7 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.500 % in 2014 and a record low of 0.500 % in 2014. United States US: Prevalence of HIV: Total: % of Population Aged 15-49 data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s USA – Table US.World Bank: Health Statistics. Prevalence of HIV refers to the percentage of people ages 15-49 who are infected with HIV.; ; UNAIDS estimates.; Weighted Average;

This dataset is about countries per year in Burkina Faso. It has 64 rows. It features 4 columns: country, incidence of HIV, and death rate.

Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population data was reported at 0.040 Ratio in 2020. This records a decrease from the previous number of 0.050 Ratio for 2019. Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population data is updated yearly, averaging 0.080 Ratio from Dec 1990 (Median) to 2020, with 31 observations. The data reached an all-time high of 0.100 Ratio in 1990 and a record low of 0.040 Ratio in 2020. Incidence of HIV: per 1,000 Uninfected Population data remains active status in CEIC and is reported by World Bank. The data is categorized under Global Database’s Canada – Table CA.World Bank.WDI: Social: Health Statistics. Number of new HIV infections among uninfected populations expressed per 1,000 uninfected population in the year before the period.;UNAIDS estimates.;Weighted average;This is the Sustainable Development Goal indicator 3.3.1 [https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/metadata/].

This dataset is about countries per year in Jordan. It has 64 rows. It features 4 columns: country, incidence of HIV, and death rate.

This dataset is about countries per year in Jamaica, has 1 rows. and is filtered where the date is 2,021. It features 4 columns: date, country, incidence of HIV, and death rate. The preview is ordered by date (descending).

Geographic coverage

The survey was conducted in two local communities in the Free State province, one urban (Welkom) and one rural (Qwaqwa), in which the HIV/AIDS epidemic is particularly rife. Welkom and Qwaqwa are situated in the Lejweleputswa and Thabo Mofutsanyane districts of the Free State province.

Analysis unit

Households

Universe

All memebers of the Household

Kind of data

Sample survey data [ssd]

Sampling procedure

The household impact of HIV/AIDS was assessed by means of a cohort study of households affected by the disease. The survey was conducted in two local communities in the Free State province, one urban (Welkom) and one rural (Qwaqwa), in which the HIV/AIDS epidemic is particularly rife. Welkom and Qwaqwa are situated in the Lejweleputswa and Thabo Mofutsanyane districts of the Free State province.

Affected households were sampled purposively via NGOs and other organizations involved in AIDS counselling and care and at baseline included at least one person known to be HIV-positive or known to have died from AIDS in the past six months. Informed consent was obtained from the infected individual(s) or their caregivers (in the case of minors). In order to explore the socio-economic impact on affected households of repeated occurrences of HIV/AIDS-related morbidity or mortality, a distinction is made between affected households in general and affected households that have experienced morbidity or mortality more frequently. Non-affected households represent households living in close proximity to affected households. These households at baseline did not include persons suffering from tuberculosis or pneumonia. The incidence of morbidity and mortality is considerably higher in affected households.

Affected households were sampled purposively via NGOs and other organizations involved in AIDS counselling and care and at baseline included at least one person known to be HIV-positive or known to have died from AIDS in the past six months. Informed consent was obtained from the infected individual(s) or their caregivers (in the case of minors). In order to explore the socio-economic impact on affected households of repeated occurrences of HIV/AIDS-related morbidity or mortality, a distinction is made between affected households in general and affected households that have experienced morbidity or mortality more frequently. Non-affected households represent households living in close proximity to affected households. These households at baseline did not include persons suffering from tuberculosis or pneumonia. The incidence of morbidity and mortality is considerably higher in affected households.

Mode of data collection

Face-to-face [f2f]

Research instrument

Household Questionnaire

Response rate

During the first wave of interviews a total of 404 interviews were conducted. During the second wave of data collection, interviews were conducted with 385 households, which translates into an attrition rate of 4.7% (19 households). During wave III, a total of 354 households were interviewed, with 31 households not being reinterviewed (7.7% of the original sample). In wave IV, 55 new households wererecruited into the study, with particular emphasis on an effort to recruit child-headed households into the survey insofar as the sample to date did not include any such households. During waves IV, V and VI a total of 3, 13 and 9 households respectively could not be re-interviewed.

The payment of a minimal participation fee (R150 per household per survey visit) to those households interviewed in each wave, following the interview and distributed in the form of food parcels, contributed to ensuring sustainability of the sample over the three-year period. The dataset includes data for 331 households interviewed in each of the six rounds of interviews. In almost 90 percent of cases the reasons for attrition are related to migration, given that this study did not intend to follow those households that move outside of the two immediate study areas, i.e. Welkom and Qwaqwa. In the majority of cases, attrition can be ascribed to the failure to establish the current whereabouts of the particular household during follow-up, while in a third of cases it could be established that the household had moved to another country, another province, or another town in the Free State province. Less than ten percent of households had refused to participate in subsequent waves. The reasons for attrition in the original sample illustrate the manner in which migration and the disintegration of households, which are important effects of the epidemic, can act to erode the sample population.

People aged 15 to 59 years seen at HIV services in the UK, expressed as a rate per 1,000 population.Data is presented by area of residence, and exclude people diagnosed with HIV in England who are resident in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland or abroad.RationaleThe geographical distribution of people seen for HIV care and treatment is not uniform across or within regions in England. Knowledge of local diagnosed HIV prevalence and identification of local risk groups can be used to help direct resources for HIV prevention and treatment.In 2008, http://www.bhiva.org/HIV-testing-guidelines.aspx recommended that Local Authority and NHS bodies consider implementing routine HIV testing for all general medical admissions as well as new registrants in primary care where the diagnosed HIV prevalence exceeds 2 in 1,000 population aged 15 to 59 years.In 2017, guidelines were updated by https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/NG60 which is co-badged with Public Health England. This guidance continues to define high HIV prevalence local authorities as those with a diagnosed HIV prevalence of between 2 and 5 per 1,000 and extremely high prevalence local authorities as those with a diagnosed HIV prevalence of 5 or more per 1,000 people aged 15 to 59 years.When this is applied to national late HIV diagnosis data, it shows that two-thirds of late HIV diagnoses occur in high-prevalence and extremely-high-prevalence local authorities. This means that if this recommendation is successfully applied in high and extremely-high-prevalence areas, it could potentially affect two-thirds of late diagnoses nationally.Local authorities should find out their diagnosed prevalence published in UKHSA's http://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/sexualhealth , as well as that of surrounding areas and adapt their strategy for HIV testing using the national guidelines.Commissioners can use these data to plan and ensure access to comprehensive and specialist local HIV care and treatment for HIV diagnosed individuals according to the http://www.medfash.org.uk/uploads/files/p17abl6hvc4p71ovpkr81ugsh60v.pdf and http://www.bhiva.org/monitoring-guidelines.aspx .Definition of numeratorThe number of people (aged 15 to 59 years) living with a diagnosed HIV infection and accessing HIV care at an NHS service in the UK and who are resident in England.Definition of denominatorResident population aged 15 to 59.The denominators for 2011 to 2023 are taken from the respective 2011 to 2023 Office for National Statistics (ONS) revised population estimates from the 2021 Census.Further details on the ONS census are available from the https://www.ons.gov.uk/census .CaveatsData is presented by geographical area of residence. Where data on residence were unavailable, residence have been assigned to the local health area of care.Every effort is made to ensure accuracy and completeness of the data, including web-based reporting with integrated checks on data quality. The overall data quality is high as the dataset is used for commissioning purposes and for the national allocation of funding. However, responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of data lies with the reporting service.Data is as reported but rely on ‘record linkage’ to integrate data and ‘de-duplication’ to prevent double counting of the same individual. The data may not be representative in areas where residence information is not known for a significant proportion of people accessing HIV care.Data supplied for previous years are updated on an annual basis due to clinic or laboratory resubmissions and improvements to data cleaning. Data may therefore differ from previous publications.Values are benchmarked against set thresholds and categorised into the following groups: <2 (low), 2 to 5 (high) and≥5 (extremely high). These have been determined by developments in national testing guidelines.The data reported in 2020 and 2021 is impacted by the reconfiguration of sexual health services during the national response to COVID-19.

Dataset from Singapore Department of Statistics. For more information, visit https://data.gov.sg/datasets/d_250a8096f848835cb4a835d31fcd8ffd/view

Forecast: Number of Deaths Due to Tuberculosis (Excluding HIV Cases) in the US 2023 - 2027 Discover more data with ReportLinker!

BackgroundWhile combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) has significantly improved survival times for persons diagnosed with HIV, estimation of life expectancy (LE) for this cohort remains a challenge, as mortality rates are a function of both time since diagnosis and age, and mortality rates for the oldest age groups may not be available.MethodsA validated case-finding algorithm for HIV was used to update the cohort of HIV-positive adults who had entered care in Ontario, Canada as of 2012. The Chiang II abridged life table algorithm was modified to use mortality rates stratified by time since entering the cohort and to include various methods for extrapolation of the excess HIV mortality rates to older age groups.ResultsAs of 2012, there were approximately 15,000 adults in care for HIV in Ontario. The crude all-cause mortality rate declined from 2.6% (95%CI 2.3, 2.9) per year in 2000 to 1.3% (1.2, 1.5) in 2012. Mortality rates were elevated for the first year of care compared to subsequent years (rate ratio of 2.6 (95% CI 2.3, 3.1)). LE for a 20-year old living in Ontario was 62 years (expected age at death is 82), while LE for a 20-year old with HIV was estimated to be reduced to 47 years, for a loss of 15 years of life. Ignoring the higher mortality rates among new cases introduced a modest bias of 1.5 additional years of life lost. In comparison, using 55+ as the open-ended age group was a major source of bias, adding 11 years to the calculated LE.ConclusionsUse of age limits less than the expected age at death for the open-ended age group significantly overstates the estimated LE and is not recommended. The Chiang II method easily accommodated input of stratified mortality rates and extrapolation of excess mortality rates.