The graph displays the divorce rate per 1,000 people in the United States from 2000 to 2022. The x-axis represents the years, labeled from '00 to '22, while the y-axis indicates the divorce rate per 1,000 individuals. The divorce rate starts at 4.0 per 1,000 in 2000 and 2001, which are the highest values in the dataset. Over the years, there is a general downward trend, with the rate decreasing to 2.3 per 1,000 in 2020, the lowest point recorded. In 2021 and 2022, the rate slightly fluctuates, rising to 2.5 and then decreasing to 2.4 per 1,000 respectively. The data highlights a consistent decline in the divorce rate over the 22-year period.

In 2022, the divorce rate in the United States stood at *** per 1,000 of the population. Divorce in the U.S. Divorce is the termination of a marital union. In the United States, as in most other countries, it is a legal process in which a judge or another legal authority dissolves the bonds of matrimony existing between two persons. The process of divorce also normally involves issues surrounding distribution of property, financial support of the former spouse, child custody and child support. A divorce also allows a person to marry again.In the United States, divorce is, like marriage, a matter for state governments, not the federal government. Although divorce laws vary from state to state, for example on which terms a divorce can be arranged, a divorce must be certified by a court of law to become effective. A declining divorce rate Over the last couple of years, both the marriage rate and the divorce rate have been declining in the United States. As of 2009, the average length of a first marriage in the U.S. was ***** years, while the average length of a second marriage was about ** years.

The National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) gathers information on family life, marriage and divorce, pregnancy, infertility, use of contraception, and men's and women's health. The survey results are used by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others to plan health services and health education programs, and to do statistical studies of families, fertility, and health. Years included: 1973, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1995, 2002, 2006-2010; Data use agreement at time of file download:

Comprehensive dataset of 23,802 Divorce lawyers in United States as of June, 2025. Includes verified contact information (email, phone), geocoded addresses, customer ratings, reviews, business categories, and operational details. Perfect for market research, lead generation, competitive analysis, and business intelligence. Download a complimentary sample to evaluate data quality and completeness.

This study gathered data on policies and procedures for identifying domestic violence issues among divorcing couples and examined divorce mediation practices and policies in cases with allegations of spousal violence. Mediators and court administrators provided information on: (1) whether and how they attempted to gauge the level of domestic abuse and the capacity of divorcing parties to mediate, and (2) common adjustments to the mediation process made to enhance safety in divorce cases where domestic abuse is present. Data collection involved a collaboration with the Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC) in the administration and analysis of this survey. Court programs providing divorce mediation and/or custody evaluations in 1993 were targeted. The questionnaire was mailed in late 1993 to 200 institutional members of the AFCC and active providers of family and divorce services in the National Center for State Courts database. A total of 149 public-sector divorce mediation and custody/visitation counseling providers responded. Variables include information on the rules, statutes, or guidelines under which the program operates, case handling procedures prior to mediation or custody/visitation evaluations, and procedures used when clients come to mediation. Information is also provided on the number of paid professional staff, number of custody/visitation mediations and evaluations completed, population of the jurisdiction, the program's relationship to the court, types of orientation programs for parents provided by the court, if the community had any supervised visitation services, and the city and state in which the program is located.

This dataset provides information on 33 in Louisiana, United States as of May, 2025. It includes details such as email addresses (where publicly available), phone numbers (where publicly available), and geocoded addresses. Explore market trends, identify potential business partners, and gain valuable insights into the industry. Download a complimentary sample of 10 records to see what's included.

Probate, pre-probate, and divorce real estate data offers valuable insights and opportunities for real estate professionals to identify and pursue potential leads. These datasets provide information about properties involved in probate, pre-probate, and divorce cases, enabling professionals to target motivated sellers and navigate specialized market niches. In this brief, we will explore the concept of probate, pre-probate, and divorce data, and discuss their applications across various industries.

What is Probate, Pre-Probate, and Divorce Data?

Probate Data refers to the legal process of settling the estate of a deceased person. Probate data includes information about properties owned by individuals who have passed away and are being transferred to their heirs or beneficiaries through a court-supervised process. This dataset contains details about properties that may be sold to distribute the deceased person’s assets or resolve any outstanding debts.

Pre-Probate Data includes properties owned by individuals who are alive but have designated their assets to be transferred to their heirs upon their passing. This dataset allows real estate professionals to identify potential sellers who may be interested in selling their properties before going through the probate process.

Divorce Data pertains to properties involved in divorce proceedings. When couples go through a divorce, the division of assets often includes the sale or transfer of properties. This dataset provides information on properties that may become available for sale due to a divorce settlement, providing real estate professionals with opportunities to target motivated sellers.

Gain an in-depth view of probate, pre-probate and divorce characteristics for more than 155 million properties across the country (or at the state- and country-level), including: - Property Address - Owner First & Last Name - Mailing Address - Legal Description - Property Value - Property Use - Parcel ID - Year Built - Date Of Death (Probate & Pre-Probate) - Defendant Information (Divorce) - Plaintiff Information (Divorce) - Defendant Attorney Information (Divorce) - Plaintiff Attorney Information (Divorce)

Context

Answers to certain questions can provide key information regarding if a couple is likely to get divorced in the future.

Content

Attribute Information:

Questions are ranked on a scale of 0-4 with 0 being the lowest and 4 being the highest. The last category states if the couple has divorced.

1. If one of us apologizes when our discussion deteriorates, the discussion ends.
2. I know we can ignore our differences, even if things get hard sometimes.
3. When we need it, we can take our discussions with my spouse from the beginning and correct it.
4. When I discuss with my spouse, to contact him will eventually work.
5. The time I spent with my wife is special for us.
6. We don't have time at home as partners.
7. We are like two strangers who share the same environment at home rather than family.
8. I enjoy our holidays with my wife.
9. I enjoy traveling with my wife.
10. Most of our goals are common to my spouse.
11. I think that one day in the future, when I look back, I see that my spouse and I have been in harmony with each other.
12. My spouse and I have similar values in terms of personal freedom.
13. My spouse and I have similar sense of entertainment.
14. Most of our goals for people (children, friends, etc.) are the same.
15. Our dreams with my spouse are similar and harmonious.
16. We're compatible with my spouse about what love should be.
17. We share the same views about being happy in our life with my spouse
18. My spouse and I have similar ideas about how marriage should be
19. My spouse and I have similar ideas about how roles should be in marriage
20. My spouse and I have similar values in trust.
21. I know exactly what my wife likes.
22. I know how my spouse wants to be taken care of when she/he sick.
23. I know my spouse's favorite food.
24. I can tell you what kind of stress my spouse is facing in her/his life.
25. I have knowledge of my spouse's inner world.
26. I know my spouse's basic anxieties.
27. I know what my spouse's current sources of stress are.
28. I know my spouse's hopes and wishes.
29. I know my spouse very well.
30. I know my spouse's friends and their social relationships.
31. I feel aggressive when I argue with my spouse.
32. When discussing with my spouse, I usually use expressions such as ‘you always’ or ‘you never’ .
33. I can use negative statements about my spouse's personality during our discussions.
34. I can use offensive expressions during our discussions.
35. I can insult my spouse during our discussions.
36. I can be humiliating when we discussions.
37. My discussion with my spouse is not calm.
38. I hate my spouse's way of open a subject.
39. Our discussions often occur suddenly.
40. We're just starting a discussion before I know what's going on.
41. When I talk to my spouse about something, my calm suddenly breaks.
42. When I argue with my spouse, ı only go out and I don't say a word.
43. I mostly stay silent to calm the environment a little bit.
44. Sometimes I think it's good for me to leave home for a while.
45. I'd rather stay silent than discuss with my spouse.
46. Even if I'm right in the discussion, I stay silent to hurt my spouse.
47. When I discuss with my spouse, I stay silent because I am afraid of not being able to control my anger.
48. I feel right in our discussions.
49. I have nothing to do with what I've been accused of.
50. I'm not actually the one who's guilty about what I'm accused of.
51. I'm not the one who's wrong about problems at home.
52. I wouldn't hesitate to tell my spouse about her/his inadequacy.
53. When I discuss, I remind my spouse of her/his inadequacy.
54. I'm not afraid to tell my spouse about her/his incompetence. **

Acknowledgements

Relevant Papers:

Yöntem, M , Adem, K , İlhan, T , Kılıçarslan, S. (2019). DIVORCE PREDICTION USING CORRELATION BASED FEATURE SELECTION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University SBE Dergisi, 9 (1), 259-273. Retrieved from [Web Link]

Citation Request:

Yöntem, M , Adem, K , İlhan, T , Kılıçarslan, S. (2019). DIVORCE PREDICTION USING CORRELATION BASED FEATURE SELECTION AND ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University SBE Dergisi, 9 (1), 259-273. Retrieved from [Web Link]

Inspiration

What are the key indicators for divorce? Which questions/factors are most significant when predicting divorce?

A national sample survey dataset covering a wide variety of issues on American family life beginning in 1987-88 and at two subsequent timepoints1992-93 and 2001-03. Topics covered included detailed household composition, family background, adult family transitions, couple interactions, parent-child interactions, education and work, health, economic and psychological well-being, and family attitudes. The first wave interviewed 13,017 respondents, including a main cross-section sample of 9,643 persons aged 19 and over plus an oversample of minorities and households containing single-parent families, step-families, recently married couples, and cohabiting couples. In each household, a randomly selected adult was interviewed. In addition, a shorter, self-administered questionnaire was filled out by the spouse or cohabiting partner of the primary respondent. Interviews averaged about 100 minutes, although interview length varied considerably with the complexity of the respondent''s family history. In 1992-94, an in-person interview was conducted of all surviving members of the original sample, the current spouse or cohabiting partner, and with the baseline spouse or partner in cases where the relationship had ended. Telephone interviews were conducted with focal children who were aged 5-12 and 13-18 at baseline. Short proxy interviews were conducted with a surviving spouse or other relative in cases where the original respondent died or was too ill to interview. A telephone interview was conducted with one randomly selected parent of the main respondent. In 2001-03, telephone interviews were conducted with: Surviving members of the original respondents who had a focal child age 5 or over at baseline; the baseline spouse/partner of these original respondents, whether or not the couple was still together; the focal children who were in the household and aged 5-18 at baselinemost of whom were interviewed at wave 2; and all other original respondents age 45 or older in 2000, and their baseline spouse/partner. Oversamples: Blacks, 9.2%; Mexican-Americans, 2.4%; Puerto Ricans, 0.7% * Dates of Study: 1987-2003 * Study Features: Longitudinal, Minority Oversampling * Sample Size (original respondents): ** Wave I (1987-88): 13,017 ** Wave II (1992-93): 10,007 ** Wave III (2001-03): 8,990 Links: * Wave I (ICPSR): http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/06041 * Wave II (ICPSR): http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/06906 * Wave III (ICPSR): http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/00171