51 datasets found
  1. N

    NYC Dog Licensing Dataset

    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • catalog.data.gov
    • +1more
    application/rdfxml +5
    Updated Feb 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Department of Mental Health and Hygeine (2024). NYC Dog Licensing Dataset [Dataset]. https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/NYC-Dog-Licensing-Dataset/nu7n-tubp
    Explore at:
    csv, json, tsv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, xmlAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Feb 6, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Department of Mental Health and Hygeine
    Area covered
    New York
    Description

    Active Dog Licenses.

    All dog owners residing in NYC are required by law to license their dogs. The data is sourced from the DOHMH Dog Licensing System (https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/DogLicense), where owners can apply for and renew dog licenses. Each record represents a unique dog license that was active during the year, but not necessarily a unique record per dog, since a license that is renewed during the year results in a separate record of an active license period. Each record stands as a unique license period for the dog over the course of the yearlong time frame.

  2. d

    Directory of Dog Runs and Off-Leash Areas

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 1, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Directory of Dog Runs and Off-Leash Areas [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/directory-of-dog-runs-and-off-leash-areas
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Nov 1, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    data.cityofnewyork.us
    Description

    Dog runs in New York City Department of Parks & Recreation properties and properties with off-leash hours for dogs.

  3. cats_vs_dogs

    • huggingface.co
    • tensorflow.org
    • +1more
    Updated Nov 26, 2021
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Microsoft (2021). cats_vs_dogs [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/microsoft/cats_vs_dogs
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Nov 26, 2021
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Microsofthttp://microsoft.com/
    License

    https://choosealicense.com/licenses/unknown/https://choosealicense.com/licenses/unknown/

    Description

    Dataset Card for Cats Vs. Dogs

      Dataset Summary
    

    A large set of images of cats and dogs. There are 1738 corrupted images that are dropped. This dataset is part of a now-closed Kaggle competition and represents a subset of the so-called Asirra dataset. From the competition page:

    The Asirra data set Web services are often protected with a challenge that's supposed to be easy for people to solve, but difficult for computers. Such a challenge is often called a CAPTCHA… See the full description on the dataset page: https://huggingface.co/datasets/microsoft/cats_vs_dogs.

  4. Weight distribution of dogs in the U.S. 2018

    • statista.com
    Updated Mar 4, 2022
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2022). Weight distribution of dogs in the U.S. 2018 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/524851/obese-and-overweight-dogs-share-in-the-us/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 4, 2022
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Oct 2018 - Nov 2018
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This survey depicts the prevalence of obese and overweight pet dogs in the United States as of 2018. Around 19 percent of dogs were reported to be obese and some 37 percent to be overweight.

  5. d

    Data on finite population change for 3 species of prairie dogs in Montana...

    • catalog.data.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data on finite population change for 3 species of prairie dogs in Montana and Utah, USA, 2000-2005 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-on-finite-population-change-for-3-species-of-prairie-dogs-in-montana-and-utah-us-2000
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    Montana, United States, Utah
    Description

    Data on annual population change for prairie dogs in Montana and Utah, USA, 2000-2005. Prairie dog species included black-tailed prairie dogs (PDs) (BTPD, Cynomys ludovicianus) in north-central Montana, white-tailed PDs (WTPD, Cynomys leucurus) in eastern Utah, and Utah PDs (UPD, Cynomys parvidens) in southwestern Utah. Field research was completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, and colleagues. Data were collected on paired plots. Each pair included a plot treated annually with deltamethrin dust for flea control and plague mitigation and a plot left untreated as baselines. Paired plots had similar ecological features on the same (split) or nearby (separate) colonies. One plot within each pair was randomly selected for deltamethrin dust treatment. We used summertime visual counts as an index to PD population size.We conducted visual counts annually during June-August, after young PDs were aboveground. We used binoculars and spotting scopes to systematically and repeatedly scan the plots (each plot was 3-9 hectares in area), beginning just after sunrise and continuing until warming temperatures caused a decline in counts. We repeated the procedure for three days, using for analysis the highest count obtained. We counted from the same locations each year, simultaneously counting treated and non-treated plots of each pair. Visual counts were transformed into values of finite population change by dividing the PD count at the end of an annual interval by the count at the beginning of the interval. For example, if year is 2001, then population change was for the interval 2000 to 2001. Primary funding was provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Survey, and Bureau of Land Management, supplemented by the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources and the Utah Department of Natural Resources Endangered Species Mitigation Fund. In-kind support was provided by the Bryce Canyon National Park, Dixie National Forest and BLM offices in Utah (Vernal, Cedar City, Richfield, and Torrey), Colorado (Meeker), and Montana (Malta). R. Reading and B. Miller of the Denver Zoological Foundation provided logistical support for parts of the study.

  6. l

    Animal Shelter Data

    • data.longbeach.gov
    • longbeach.opendatasoft.com
    • +1more
    csv, excel, geojson +1
    Updated Mar 25, 2025
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Animal Shelter Data [Dataset]. https://data.longbeach.gov/explore/dataset/animal-shelter-intakes-and-outcomes/
    Explore at:
    geojson, csv, json, excelAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 25, 2025
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Description

    This dataset comprises of the intake and outcome record from Long Beach Animal Shelter.

  7. h

    stanford-dogs

    • huggingface.co
    Updated Dec 24, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    stanford-dogs [Dataset]. https://huggingface.co/datasets/amaye15/stanford-dogs
    Explore at:
    CroissantCroissant is a format for machine-learning datasets. Learn more about this at mlcommons.org/croissant.
    Dataset updated
    Dec 24, 2024
    Authors
    Andrew Mayes
    Description

    amaye15/stanford-dogs dataset hosted on Hugging Face and contributed by the HF Datasets community

  8. Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2023

    • statista.com
    Updated Feb 13, 2024
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2024). Number of U.S. pet owning households by species 2023 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/198095/pets-in-the-united-states-by-type-in-2008/
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 13, 2024
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    An estimated 65.1 million households in the United States owned at least one dog according to a 2023/24 pet owners survey, making them the most widely owned type of pet across the U.S. at this time. Cats and freshwater fish ranked in second and third places, with around 46.5 million and 11.1 million households owning such pets, respectively.

    Freshwater vs. salt water fish

    Freshwater fish spend most or all their lives in fresh water. Fresh water’s main difference to salt water is the level of salinity. Freshwater fish have a range of physiological adaptations to enable them to live in such conditions. As the statistic makes clear, Americans keep a large number of freshwater aquatic species at home as pets.

    American pet owners

    In 2023, around 66 percent of all households in the United States owned a pet. This is a decrease from 2020, but still around a 10 percent increase from 1988. It is no surprise that as more and more households own pets, pet industry expenditure has also witnessed steady growth. Expenditure reached over 136 billion U.S. dollars in 2022, almost a sixfold increase from 1998. The majority of pet product sales are still made in brick-and-mortar stores , despite the rise and evolution of e-commerce in the United States.

  9. d

    DOHMH Dog Bite Data

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • +1more
    Updated Feb 21, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    DOHMH Dog Bite Data [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/dohmh-dog-bite-data
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Feb 21, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.cityofnewyork.us
    Description

    NYC Reported Dog Bites. Section 11.03 of NYC Health Code requires all animals bites to be reported within 24 hours of the event. Information reported assists the Health Department to determine if the biting dog is healthy ten days after the person was bitten in order to avoid having the person bitten receive unnecessary rabies shots. Data is collected from reports received online, mail, fax or by phone to 311 or NYC DOHMH Animal Bite Unit. Each record represents a single dog bite incident. Information on breed, age, gender and Spayed or Neutered status have not been verified by DOHMH and is listed only as reported to DOHMH. A blank space in the dataset means no data was available.

  10. d

    Data on Utah prairie dog body condition and reproductive success, Awapa...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Data on Utah prairie dog body condition and reproductive success, Awapa Plateau, Utah, USA, 2013–2016 [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-on-utah-prairie-dog-body-condition-and-reproductive-success-awapa-plateau-utah-usa-20
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    United States Geological Surveyhttp://www.usgs.gov/
    Area covered
    United States, Utah, Awapa Plateau
    Description

    Data on body condition and reproduction of Utah prairie dogs at 5 colonies on the Awapa Plateau, Utah, USA, June-August 2013-2016. Utah prairie dogs were live-trapped and sampled on 5 colonies. We recorded the age (juvenile/adult) and mass (nearest 5 grams) of each prairie dog and marked its ears and body with metal tags and passive integrated transponders, respectively, for permanent identification. We measured each prairie dog's right hind foot length (nearest millimeter). We indexed each adult prairie dog's body condition as the ratio between its mass and hind-foot length. Prairie dogs were allowed to recover from anesthesia and released at their trapping locations. We indexed prairie dog reproduction, by colony and year, as the ratio of the number of juveniles per adult (juvenile:adult ratios). Funding and logistical support were provided by the U. S. Geological Survey (USGS), Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and Colorado State University. Fieldwork was completed by the USGS Fort Collins Science Center, and lab work and flea identifications were completed by the USGS National Wildlife Health Center.

  11. Preference of dogs vs. cats in the U.S. 2017

    • statista.com
    Updated Dec 23, 2019
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Statista (2019). Preference of dogs vs. cats in the U.S. 2017 [Dataset]. https://www.statista.com/forecasts/978845/preference-of-dogs-vs-cats-in-the-us
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Dec 23, 2019
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Statistahttp://statista.com/
    Time period covered
    Oct 17, 2017 - Oct 25, 2017
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    This statistic shows the results of a survey conducted in the United States in 2017 on pets. Some 51 percent of the respondents stated that they prefer dogs.The Survey Data Table for the Statista survey pets in the U.S. 2017 contains the complete tables for the survey including various column headings.

  12. d

    Black-tailed prairie dog capture data from plots treated and not treated...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Black-tailed prairie dog capture data from plots treated and not treated with oral plague vaccine from 2013-2017 in Montana [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/black-tailed-prairie-dog-capture-data-from-plots-treated-and-not-treated-with-oral-plague-
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Description

    Oral sylvatic plague vaccine baits (SPV) and placebo baits were distributed once annually from 2013-2016 on treated and non-treated paired plots from 2013-2016. Black-tailed prairie dogs (BTPD) were live-trapped and permanently marked with passive integrated transponders and ear tags on 4 pairs of plots each year from 2013-2017 to provide capture/recapture data for use in estimating BTPD survival. The first data set (CMR_SPV_RAW_CAPTURE_DATA.csv) lists all captures and associated covariates with each line representing data from a single prairie dog. The second data set (CMR_BTPD_WEIGHTS.csv) lists the weight and associated information for each prairie dog at each handling. The third data set (CMR_FLEAS_BY_HOST.csv) lists the number of fleas collected from each prairie dog at each handling. Funding was provided through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, multiple USGS sources, grants from the Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks and World Wildlife Fund.

  13. f

    Summary data for dogs denied entry to the United States by year, January 1,...

    • plos.figshare.com
    xls
    Updated Jun 2, 2023
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Emily G. Pieracci; Cara E. Williams; Ryan M. Wallace; Cheryl R. Kalapura; Clive M. Brown (2023). Summary data for dogs denied entry to the United States by year, January 1, 2018—December 31,2020. [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254287.t001
    Explore at:
    xlsAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jun 2, 2023
    Dataset provided by
    PLOS ONE
    Authors
    Emily G. Pieracci; Cara E. Williams; Ryan M. Wallace; Cheryl R. Kalapura; Clive M. Brown
    License

    Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
    License information was derived automatically

    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    Summary data for dogs denied entry to the United States by year, January 1, 2018—December 31,2020.

  14. c

    Data on prairie dog densities, flea abundance, and plague epizootics in...

    • s.cnmilf.com
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +2more
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Data on prairie dog densities, flea abundance, and plague epizootics in Montana and Utah, USA [Dataset]. https://s.cnmilf.com/user74170196/https/catalog.data.gov/dataset/data-on-prairie-dog-densities-flea-abundance-and-plague-epizootics-in-montana-and-utah-usa
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    United States, Utah, Montana
    Description

    Data on prairie dog densities, flea abundance on prairie dogs, and plague epizootics in Montana and Utah, USA, 2003-2005. Prairie dog species (PDspecies in the data file) included black-tailed prairie dogs (PDs) (BTPD, Cynomys ludovicianus) in north-central Montana, white-tailed PDs (WTPD, Cynomys leucurus) in eastern Utah, and Utah PDs (UPD, Cynomys parvidens) in southwestern Utah. Field research was completed by the U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, and colleagues. We used summertime visual counts as an index to PD densities (Pddensity in the data file). For each plot, we counted PDs using binoculars and/or spotting scopes from a single _location outside the plot that gave the best view of the entire plot and repeated these counts on three (usually consecutive) days. We began counts just after sunrise and continued to conduct repeated systematic scans of the plot until the counts declined to about half the peak number (usually by late morning as PDs went below ground for their typical mid-day break). We converted the counts to density estimates (counts per hectare [ha]).The estimate we used to calculate density was the highest count obtained from a plot for the 3 days within a given year. We analyzed data from colonies experiencing a plague epizootic during this particular study (with an epizootic defined as greater than or equal to 90% decline in PD density). We indexed annual population change (PDpopchgProportion in the data file) by subtracting the count density estimate of the year before a plague epizootic (t1) from the density estimate during an epizootic (t2) for each plot, and dividing that by the density estimate from t1 to summarize population change as a proportionate change. We evaluated the correlation between PD population change and PD density in year t1, because negative plague-effects and the intensity of population decline may be greatest when PD densities are high in year t1 (a potential "density dependent" phenomenon discussed in a wide range of literature on disease ecology). We also evaluated the correlation between PD population change and flea abundance in year t1, because rates of plague transmission and, therefore, PD mortality are expected to increase with increasing flea densities. To assess flea abundance (PDfleas in the data file), we combed live-trapped PDs and counted the number of fleas on each PD. The PDs were live-trapped, individually marked with ear tags, and combed as thoroughly as possible for 30 seconds (s) to collect fleas. Prairie dogs were allowed to recover from anesthesia and released at their trapping locations. For each plot and year, we used the average value of flea counts (defined as flea abundance).

  15. F

    Producer Price Index by Industry: Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing: Dog Food

    • fred.stlouisfed.org
    json
    Updated Mar 13, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2025). Producer Price Index by Industry: Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing: Dog Food [Dataset]. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PCU3111113111111
    Explore at:
    jsonAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Mar 13, 2025
    License

    https://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domainhttps://fred.stlouisfed.org/legal/#copyright-public-domain

    Description

    Graph and download economic data for Producer Price Index by Industry: Dog and Cat Food Manufacturing: Dog Food (PCU3111113111111) from Dec 1985 to Feb 2025 about pets, food, manufacturing, PPI, industry, inflation, price index, indexes, price, and USA.

  16. d

    Canine Waste Dispensers

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.cityofnewyork.us
    • +1more
    Updated Mar 8, 2025
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    data.cityofnewyork.us (2025). Canine Waste Dispensers [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/canine-waste-dispensers
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Mar 8, 2025
    Dataset provided by
    data.cityofnewyork.us
    Description

    • One line of data represents the location of a canine waste bag dispenser, including what surface it is mounted on, who refills it, who made it, and when it was installed. • Data is collected by analysts located in each borough and collated by Parks’ Innovation & Performance Management team. • Data is updated as needed using an ArcGIS Online web application. • Records for dispensers that are no longer active have been removed • Not all records have an installation date. Records will only have an OMPPropID and SubProperty name if they fall within the bounds of a sub property.

  17. d

    Data from: An early dog from Southeast Alaska supports a coastal route for...

    • datadryad.org
    • data.niaid.nih.gov
    • +1more
    zip
    Updated Jan 29, 2021
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Flavio Augusto da Silva Coelho; Stephanie Gill; Crystal Tomlin; Timothy Heaton; Charlotte Lindqvist (2021). An early dog from Southeast Alaska supports a coastal route for the first dog migration into the Americas [Dataset]. http://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.tb2rbp000
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    Jan 29, 2021
    Dataset provided by
    Dryad
    Authors
    Flavio Augusto da Silva Coelho; Stephanie Gill; Crystal Tomlin; Timothy Heaton; Charlotte Lindqvist
    Time period covered
    2021
    Area covered
    Southeast Alaska, Alaska, Americas
    Description

    The oldest confirmed remains of domestic dogs in North America are from mid-continent archeological sites dated ~9,900 calibrated years before present (cal BP). Although this date suggests that dogs may not have arrived alongside the first Native Americans, the timing and routes for the entrance of New World dogs are unclear. Here, we present a complete mitochondrial genome of a dog from Southeast Alaska, dated to 10,150 ± 260 cal BP. We compared this high-coverage genome with data from modern dog breeds, historical Arctic dogs, and American precontact dogs (PCDs) from before European arrival. Our analyses demonstrate that the ancient dog shared a common ancestor with PCDs that lived ~14,500 years ago and diverged from Siberian dogs around 16,000 years ago, coinciding with the minimum suggested date for the opening of the North Pacific coastal (NPC) route along the Cordilleran Ice Sheet and genetic evidence for the initial peopling of the Americas. This ancient Southeast Alaskan dog occ...

  18. d

    Mean flea counts from prairie dogs and their burrows in Utah (2000), New...

    • catalog.data.gov
    • data.usgs.gov
    • +1more
    Updated Jul 6, 2024
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    U.S. Geological Survey (2024). Mean flea counts from prairie dogs and their burrows in Utah (2000), New Mexico (2010-2012), and Montana (2016, 2019) [Dataset]. https://catalog.data.gov/dataset/mean-flea-counts-from-prairie-dogs-and-their-burrows-in-utah-2000-new-mexico-2010-201-2016
    Explore at:
    Dataset updated
    Jul 6, 2024
    Dataset provided by
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Area covered
    New Mexico, Utah
    Description

    Mean flea counts from prairie dogs and their burrows in Utah (2000), New Mexico (2010-2012), and Montana (2016, 2019). Prairie dogs were live-trapped, anesthetized with isoflurane, and combed thoroughly for 30 or 45 seconds to remove and count fleas. Prairie dogs were allowed to recover from anesthesia and released at their trapping locations. Randomly selected prairie dog burrows were swabbed for fleas using a plumber’s snake to insert a white flannel-cloth as deep as possible into each tunnel; the cable was shook ~30 seconds, and the cloth was removed from the burrow and quickly sealed in a re-sealable zipper storage bag. Fleas were later removed from swabs and counted. Mean flea counts were calculated for each sampling site, and sampling interval, as the total number of fleas collected (from prairie dogs or burrows) divided by the total number of sampling occasions (combings or swabbings). Funding and logistical support were provided by the U.S. Geological Survey; Turner Endangered Species Fund; Turner Enterprises Incorporated; Colorado State University; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Charles M. Russell National Wildlife Refuge; Shortgrass Steppe Long-Term Ecological Research Project; National Science Foundation; and the U.S. Department of Defense Strategic Environment Research and Development Program.

  19. US Pet Treats Market Size & Share Analysis - Industry Research Report -...

    • mordorintelligence.com
    pdf,excel,csv,ppt
    + more versions
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    Mordor Intelligence, US Pet Treats Market Size & Share Analysis - Industry Research Report - Growth Trends [Dataset]. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/us-pet-treats-market
    Explore at:
    pdf,excel,csv,pptAvailable download formats
    Dataset authored and provided by
    Mordor Intelligence
    License

    https://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policyhttps://www.mordorintelligence.com/privacy-policy

    Time period covered
    2017 - 2030
    Area covered
    United States
    Description

    The US Pet Treats Market is segmented by Sub Product (Crunchy Treats, Dental Treats, Freeze-dried and Jerky Treats, Soft & Chewy Treats), by Pets (Cats, Dogs) and by Distribution Channel (Convenience Stores, Online Channel, Specialty Stores, Supermarkets/Hypermarkets). The market volume and value are presented in metric ton and USD respectively. The key data points include the market size of pet food by products, distribution channels, and pets.

  20. d

    Probability of Synanthropic Feral Dog Presence in the Western United States....

    • datadiscoverystudio.org
    zip
    Updated May 20, 2018
    Share
    FacebookFacebook
    TwitterTwitter
    Email
    Click to copy link
    Link copied
    Close
    Cite
    (2018). Probability of Synanthropic Feral Dog Presence in the Western United States. [Dataset]. http://datadiscoverystudio.org/geoportal/rest/metadata/item/0f3cf062a5954e1cb3b02b0520389cdf/html
    Explore at:
    zipAvailable download formats
    Dataset updated
    May 20, 2018
    Description

    description: This model is based on how dogs utilize wildlands near human habituation. These predators can have detrimental effects on wildlife populations (Alterio et al. 1998). We based our model on the data collected by Odell and Knight (2001) that investigated habitat utilization of these predators with regard to distance from housing and on the probability for a homeowner to possess a dog. We buffered the both the populated areas and the campground distance layers in ARC/INFO using probability functions [P = 0.548 - 1.4589 * Distance (km)]. Any cell with distance less than 0.36km received a probability based on the function (0.556 to 0.001572) and all distances greater than or equal to 0.36km from populated areas or campgrounds were assigned a probability of 0. We combined the two models into the dog model by selecting the maximum value at each pixel location from the 2 models using the MAX command in ARC/INFO. The resulting dataset was then resampled to 180m using the bilinear interpolation option.; abstract: This model is based on how dogs utilize wildlands near human habituation. These predators can have detrimental effects on wildlife populations (Alterio et al. 1998). We based our model on the data collected by Odell and Knight (2001) that investigated habitat utilization of these predators with regard to distance from housing and on the probability for a homeowner to possess a dog. We buffered the both the populated areas and the campground distance layers in ARC/INFO using probability functions [P = 0.548 - 1.4589 * Distance (km)]. Any cell with distance less than 0.36km received a probability based on the function (0.556 to 0.001572) and all distances greater than or equal to 0.36km from populated areas or campgrounds were assigned a probability of 0. We combined the two models into the dog model by selecting the maximum value at each pixel location from the 2 models using the MAX command in ARC/INFO. The resulting dataset was then resampled to 180m using the bilinear interpolation option.

Share
FacebookFacebook
TwitterTwitter
Email
Click to copy link
Link copied
Close
Cite
Department of Mental Health and Hygeine (2024). NYC Dog Licensing Dataset [Dataset]. https://data.cityofnewyork.us/Health/NYC-Dog-Licensing-Dataset/nu7n-tubp

NYC Dog Licensing Dataset

Explore at:
2 scholarly articles cite this dataset (View in Google Scholar)
csv, json, tsv, application/rssxml, application/rdfxml, xmlAvailable download formats
Dataset updated
Feb 6, 2024
Dataset authored and provided by
Department of Mental Health and Hygeine
Area covered
New York
Description

Active Dog Licenses.

All dog owners residing in NYC are required by law to license their dogs. The data is sourced from the DOHMH Dog Licensing System (https://a816-healthpsi.nyc.gov/DogLicense), where owners can apply for and renew dog licenses. Each record represents a unique dog license that was active during the year, but not necessarily a unique record per dog, since a license that is renewed during the year results in a separate record of an active license period. Each record stands as a unique license period for the dog over the course of the yearlong time frame.

Search
Clear search
Close search
Google apps
Main menu